Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

ANALYSIS

Education Committee

HB 1240

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Brief Description: Concerning restraint or isolation of students, including students with disabilities, in public schools.

Sponsors: Representatives Pollet, Santos, S. Hunt, Orwall, Senn, Lytton, Robinson, Walsh, Griffey, Goodman, Buys and Tarleton.

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Makes the section on restraint of students with Individualized Education Programs or Section 504 plans applicable to all students.

  • Provides that restraint or isolation of any student is permitted only when reasonably necessary to control unpredicted, spontaneous behavior that poses an imminent likelihood of serious harm, and may not be used as planned behavioral interventions.

  • Requires the Washington State School Directors' Association to develop and school districts to adopt policy limiting the use of restraint or isolation of students.

  • Modifies the school's restraint or isolation follow-up procedures and reporting requirements.

Hearing Date: 1/26/15

Staff: Megan Wargacki (786-7194).

Background:

Special Education.

Each school district is required to provide an appropriate educational opportunity to children with disabilities, meaning those children who have been determined eligible for special education due to a disability. Two federal laws require school districts to provide individualized education and support services to these children. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires that districts provide to each public school child who receives special education an Individualized Education Program (IEP). An IEP guides the delivery of special education supports and services designed to meet the child's unique needs. The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504, requires that districts provide to each qualified student with a disability regular or special education services and related services designed to meet the student's individual educational needs.

Restraint or Isolation Laws.

State law encourages parents and teachers to use methods of correction and restraint that are not dangerous to children. The physical discipline of a child is allowed when it is reasonable and moderate and it is inflicted by a parent, teacher, or guardian for purposes of restraining or correcting the child. The following actions are presumed unreasonable when used to correct or restrain a child:

In 2013, the legislature enacted ESHB 1688. This bill placed certain requirements on the restraint or isolation of students who have an IEP or section 504 plan and who are

participating in school-sponsored instruction or activities.

Conditions for the Use of Restraint or Isolation.

The Office of the Superintended of Public Instruction (OSPI) is required to establish in rule eligibility criteria for special education programs for children with disabilities, including the use of aversive interventions.

By rule, the use of aversive interventions that involve "isolation," meaning excluding a student from his or her regular instructional area and isolating the student within a room or any other form of enclosure, are subject to the following conditions:

By rule, the use of aversive interventions that involve "physical restraint," meaning involving physically restraining or immobilizing a student by binding or otherwise attaching the student's limbs together or by binding or otherwise attaching any part of the student's body to an object, are subject to the following conditions:

Summary of Bill:

The provision related to restraint of students with IEPs or section 504 plans is made applicable to all students. The definition of "isolation" is modified by removing the statement that it means excluding a student from his or her regular instructional area, and adding that it does not include a student’s voluntary use of a quiet space for self-calming. The definition of "restraint device" to modified by adding that it must not be construed as encouraging the use of these devices.

An IEP or section 504 plan must not include the use of restraint or isolation as a planned behavior intervention. Restraint or isolation of any student is permitted only when reasonably necessary to control unpredicted, spontaneous behavior that poses an imminent likelihood of serious harm, meaning:

Each school district must adopt a policy providing for the least amount of restraint or isolation appropriate to protect the safety of students and staff under such circumstances. Schools are required to follow-up after incidents of restraint or isolation:

Schools are required to report incidents of isolation, in addition to incidents of restraint, and to both reports include any recommendations for changing the nature or amount of resources available to the student and staff members in order to avoid further incidents.

The Washington State School Directors' Association is required to develop, in consultation with various stakeholders, a model policy limiting restraint or isolation, which must be distributed to school districts by 180 days after the effective date of the bill.

In the statute that requires the OSPI to establish in rule special education eligibility criteria, the term "aversive interventions" is changed to "positive behavior interventions."

Technical changes are made.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.