HOUSE BILL REPORT

HB 1250

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by House Committee On:

Local Government

Title: An act relating to notice and review processes for annexations, deannexations, incorporations, disincorporations, consolidations, and boundary line adjustments under Titles 35 and 35A RCW.

Brief Description: Concerning notice and review processes for annexations, deannexations, incorporations, disincorporations, consolidations, and boundary line adjustments under Titles 35 and 35A RCW.

Sponsors: Representatives Holy and S. Hunt; by request of Office of Financial Management.

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

Local Government: 1/27/15, 2/17/15 [DPS].

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

  • Requires initiators of city incorporation proceedings and boundary change proposals to submit notice of the proposed actions to the Office of Financial Management (OFM).

  • Requires the OFM to review incorporation and boundary change proposals, and to provide comments on proposals under specified circumstances.

  • Establishes a general definition of ''contiguous'' for city incorporations and other boundary change proposals.

  • Modifies provisions governing incorporations and city and town boundary changes, including: changing specific annexation requirements; establishing procedural requirements related to de-annexations and boundary line adjustments, and requiring the use of population estimates produced by the OFM.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Takko, Chair; Gregerson, Vice Chair; Taylor, Ranking Minority Member; Griffey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Fitzgibbon, McBride, McCaslin, Peterson and Pike.

Staff: Ethan Moreno (786-7386).

Background:

Municipal Boundaries - General Laws and Local Control.

Article XI, Section 10 of the Washington Constitution prohibits the Legislature from directly establishing cities and towns, but instead requires the Legislature to adopt general laws for the incorporation, organization, and classification of cities and towns. In accordance with this constitutional directive, the Legislature has adopted numerous procedural and substantive requirements governing the establishment and modification of boundaries of cities, towns, and "code cities," the term used to describe cities that operate under an optional municipal code.

While municipal boundaries are established through the initial incorporation of cities and towns, municipal boundaries may be changed through several methods and processes, including:

Office of Financial Management.

The Office of Financial Management (OFM) was established through legislation in 1969 as a division of the Office of the Governor. The OFM provides information, fiscal services, and policy support for the Governor and state agencies. State agencies and the Legislature also utilize information produced and provided by the OFM.

Primary responsibilities of the OFM include:

Office of Financial Management - Population Estimates, Annexations, and Related Allocations of State Funds.

According to the OFM, its Small Area Estimates Program (SAEP) produces population estimates that are meant to provide a consistent set of small area population and housing data for statewide applications. The SAEP estimates are generated for census areas and other areas of statewide significance.

When territory is annexed to a city or town, a related certificate of annexation (certificate) and associated legal descriptions must be provided to the OFM. The OFM must also provide a copy of the certificate to the Department of Transportation. Following a determination of population for the applicable area, a process for which the city or town is responsible, and final approval of the certificate, the OFM considers the applicable territory when determining the population of the city or town. These population determinations are then forwarded to state officials and departments responsible for making population-based allocations or payments to cities and towns.

Boundary Review Boards.

Boundary review boards (boards) are authorized in statute to guide and control the creation and growth of municipalities in metropolitan areas. While statute provides for the establishment of boards in counties with at least 210,000 residents, a board may be created and established in any other county. Board members are appointed by the Governor and local government officials from within the applicable county.

Upon receiving a timely and sufficient request for review, and following an invocation of a board's jurisdiction, a board must review and, subject to requirements and limitations, approve, disapprove, or modify proposed actions, including actions pertaining to the creation, incorporation, or change in the boundary of any city, town, or special purpose district. In reaching decisions on proposed actions, boards must satisfy public hearing requirements and must attempt to satisfy objectives prescribed in statute, including the preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities, and the use of physical boundaries.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Summary of Substitute Bill:

Office of Financial Management - Receipt and Review of Proposed Actions, Criteria for Agency Denial of Proposal.

The initiator of a proposed action regarding: (1) annexation, (2) de-annexation, (3) incorporation, (4) disincorporation, (5) consolidation of cities, or (6) boundary line adjustment under general provisions governing cities and towns must file notice with the Office of Financial Management (OFM) for its review. The notice must be filed:

The notice must be submitted with:

Within 30 days of receiving the notice, the OFM must review the documents submitted under the notice and provide comments to the initiator of the proposed boundary action if any of the following occur:

The OFM must post the documents submitted with the received notices on its website and must provide notice to the Department of Transportation. The OFM must also produce an annexation, de-annexation, incorporation, disincorporation, city consolidation, and boundary line adjustment report 30 days before the commencement of each quarterly period, post the report on its website, and notify state entities according to specified requirements.

The requirements for the OFM to approve of initiated actions does not affect the authority of boundary review boards (boards) to review and approve, disapprove, or modify actions subject to their review.

Definition of "Contiguous".

A general definition of "contiguous" is established for incorporations and boundary line modifications. The term is defined to mean that territory proposed to be annexed, de-annexed, incorporated, or consolidated touches or is in physical contact with a city boundary, though the contact must be more than a single point. Territory connected to a city only by a public right-of-way, where the edge of the right-of-way does not constitute part of the city boundary, is not considered contiguous.

Application of New Requirements and Provisions to Incorporation Proceedings and Boundary Change Proposals.

Provisions requiring persons or entities initiating, or considering approval of, incorporations and other boundary change proposals to notify the OFM are established. The incorporations and boundary change proposals are subject to review by the OFM. The provisions establishing the OFM notification requirements, or the OFM notification and review requirements, apply to provisions governing:

Additional Requirements and Provisions Related to Incorporation Proceedings and Boundary Change Proposals.

Other policy changes related to incorporations and other boundary change proposals are established. Examples include the following:

Office of Financial Management - Boundary Changes and Related Allocations of State Funds.

Provisions governing the OFM's role in receiving certificates of annexation (certificates) and legal descriptions related to annexations are modified by, in part, extending the notice and certificate requirements for annexations, to de-annexation actions, boundary line adjustment actions, and consolidation actions.

Additionally, whenever: (1) any territory is annexed to, or de-annexed from, a city or town, (2) any territory is subject to boundary line adjustment, or (3) cities are consolidated, a copy of the complete ordinance containing a legal description and a map showing specifically the boundaries of the territory or consolidated area must be submitted to the OFM immediately after the city or town's adoption of the applicable ordinance.

Within two days of receipt of the ordinance, the OFM must post a digital copy on the Internet or transmit digital copies to the departments of Transportation and Revenue. Cities and towns are relieved of their obligation to provide full ordinance copies and legal descriptions of the annexed territory to the OFM.

After final approval of the certificate, the OFM must forward the revised boundary information to state officials and departments responsible for making population-based allocations or payments to cities and towns.

Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:

The substitute bill makes the following changes to the original bill:

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Preliminary fiscal note available.

Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) This is a complex bill that streamlines annexations and boundary line adjustment procedures.  The concept of the bill relates to giving the Office of Financial Management (OFM) veto authority over certain annexations and boundary line adjustments if specific criteria are met.  Receptivity exists for friendly amendments that may limit the scope of the OFM's authority.

Cities support the bill, and the primary reason is because it contains a series of smart changes to the annexation process.  The bill places the review by the OFM of maps and documents at the front end of the boundary change process rather than at the back end; this approach is more efficient and will lessen confusion.  Additional discussions are ongoing related to whether the OFM should have certification authority rather than approval authority, the role of boundary review boards (boards), and other items.

This bill does not represent a task that the OFM sought, but the OFM did complete an internal management process related to increasing processing speeds by the OFM of annexations and boundary change proposals.  It was discovered through that process that much of the annexation and boundary change delays occur at the end of the process. This bill is designed to have the OFM involved in the certification process at the beginning of the process, rather than at the end when making needed changes are time-consuming and expensive.  The OFM intends for this bill's provisions to run concurrently with the board processes.

(With concerns) As with cities, counties support a review by the OFM at the front end of the boundary change process, but counties are concerned about the lack of clarity regarding board provisions.

(Opposed) The attorney general for the boards is working on amendatory language to ensure that the OFM will work in a parallel process with boards and that board authority is not usurped by the bill. If these changes are made, the opposition will change to support.

Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Holy, prime sponsor; Carl Schroeder, Association of Washington Cities; and Marc Baldwin, Office of Financial Management.

(With concerns) Laura Merrill, Washington State Association of Counties.

(Opposed) Roberta Myers, Boundary Review Board.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.