Washington State

House of Representatives

Office of Program Research

BILL

ANALYSIS

Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee

HB 1627

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Brief Description: Expanding the existing prohibition on unlawfully entering the land of another to hunt or to retrieve hunted wildlife under Title 77 RCW to include entering the land of another to collect wildlife parts.

Sponsors: Representative Schmick.

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Expands the existing prohibition on entering the premises of another to hunt or retrieve hunted wildlife to include the act of collecting wildlife parts from the premises of another.

Hearing Date: 2/10/15

Staff: Peter Clodfelter (786-7127).

Background:

It is a misdemeanor to unlawfully hunt on or retrieve hunted wildlife from the premises of another if a person knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in or on the premises of another for the purpose of hunting wildlife or retrieving hunted wildlife. The following are defenses to a prosecution for unlawfully hunting on or retrieving hunted wildlife from the premises of another:

If a person is found guilty of unlawfully hunting on or retrieving hunted wildlife from the premises of another, then, upon conviction, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) must revoke all of the person's hunting licenses and tags and order a suspension of the person's hunting privileges for two years. The WDFW must seize any wildlife or wildlife parts that were unlawfully hunted or unlawfully retrieved from the premises of another.

Summary of Bill:

The existing prohibition on unlawfully hunting on or retrieving hunted wildlife from the premises of another is expanded to include the act of collecting wildlife parts from the premises of another. Generally, a person charged with unlawfully collecting wildlife parts from the premises of another may assert the same defenses as a person charged with unlawfully hunting wildlife on the premises of another. However, just as the defense of avoiding wasting fish or wildlife is unavailable to a person who is charged with unlawfully hunting wildlife on the premises of another, the defense of avoiding wasting fish or wildlife is unavailable to a person charged with unlawfully collecting wildlife parts from the premises of another.

A person convicted of unlawfully collecting wildlife parts from the premises of another will not have any hunting licenses or tags they may possess revoked or have their hunting privileges suspended for two years like a person would have if convicted of unlawfully hunting on or retrieving hunted wildlife from the premises of another. The WDFW must seize wildlife parts that were unlawfully collected from the premises of another.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.