HOUSE BILL REPORT

ESHB 1845

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Passed House:

March 5, 2015

Title: An act relating to pharmaceutical waste.

Brief Description: Concerning pharmaceutical waste.

Sponsors: House Committee on Environment (originally sponsored by Representatives DeBolt, Fitzgibbon, Orcutt, Short, Smith and Jinkins).

Brief History:

Committee Activity:

Environment: 2/12/15, 2/19/15 [DPS].

Floor Activity:

Passed House: 3/5/15, 98-0.

Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill

  • Requires the Department of Ecology (Department) to convene a stakeholder workgroup in order to evaluate pharmaceutical waste management policies and encourages the Department to use enforcement discretion until the work group completes its evaluation.

  • Requires the stakeholder workgroup to submit recommendations to the Legislature by December 31, 2015.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT

Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Fitzgibbon, Chair; Peterson, Vice Chair; Short, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Farrell, Fey, Goodman, Harris, McBride and Pike.

Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 1 member: Representative Taylor.

Minority Report: Without recommendation. Signed by 1 member: Representative Shea, Ranking Minority Member.

Staff: Jacob Lipson (786-7196).

Background:

The federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency to control the generation, transport, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous wastes. The Department of Ecology (Department) is the designated lead agency for implementing the RCRA requirements in Washington. State law also provides separate authority for the Department to control the management of dangerous wastes designated under state law. Certain types of waste, including certain pharmaceutical medicines, that are not designated as hazardous under federal law are designated as dangerous by the state. Both hazardous and dangerous wastes must be identified by generating facilities and must be managed in accordance with regulations that apply to various specific types of wastes generated. Facilities that receive, sort, treat, and dispose of dangerous and hazardous wastes must receive a state or federal permit that authorizes the facility to handle those types of waste.

Several categories of pharmaceutical medicine are established in state law. Controlled substances are those drugs that are regulated under the federal Controlled Substances Act and restricted in use because of their potential for abuse or dependency. Legend drugs are drugs which must be dispensed through a prescription unless being dispensed by a medical practitioner. Over-the-counter medications are available to customers without a prescription.

In 2008 the Department published an interim policy for the enforcement of dangerous waste regulations as applied to pharmaceutical wastes of retail pharmacies and patient care facilities including hospitals. Generators managing pharmaceutical waste under the 2008 interim policy must either send waste to a RCRA-permitted incinerator for disposal or must segregate dangerous wastes designated as state-only dangerous waste but not as federal hazardous waste. State-only dangerous waste must be managed in accordance with the state's dangerous waste rules, which allows certain state-only pharmaceuticals to be disposed of in facilities permitted to incinerate municipal solid waste or that meet certain other combustion temperature requirements. Dangerous waste that is also infectious waste must either be sent to a RCRA-permitted facility, or, if it is state-only dangerous waste, may be sent to a disposal facility with a permit to accept both state-only dangerous and infectious wastes. Salt-water, sugar-water, and other water solutions without vitamins or additives may be disposed of as sewage with approval from the local wastewater treatment facility. The 2008 interim enforcement guidance also details rules for waste accumulation practices, empty container management, recordkeeping, and for reverse distribution of unwanted pharmaceuticals that are intact and can still be used for their original intended purposes.

Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill:

By September 1, 2015, the Department must convene a stakeholder workgroup that includes state agencies, hospitals, pharmaceutical waste-handling facilities, and others. The workgroup must develop recommendations on new pharmaceutical waste policies, consistent implementation of existing rules, and consistent statewide regulatory enforcement. The workgroup is to be facilitated by a consultant with expertise in the RCRA and is directed to submit its recommendations by December 31, 2015. Until the workgroup submits its recommendations, the Department is encouraged to use its enforcement discretion, and is prohibited from using information shared during the workgroup process for enforcement purposes unless there is a substantial human health risk or a probability of environmental harm.

An intent section declares a legislative goal to develop a consistent statewide pharmaceutical waste management system that helps regulated businesses comply with dangerous waste laws.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) The intention of this bill is to narrowly focus on new dangerous waste management practices for pharmaceuticals. The pharmaceutical waste generators, waste handlers, and the Department should enter into an open dialogue for how to improve management without the regulated parties being afraid of enforcement action being taken. Pharmaceutical wastes bring up unique management issues as compared to other types of dangerous wastes. The Department's current enforcement guidelines have not been able to eliminate confusion and mismanagement by waste generators. It is difficult for waste handlers to identify and sort dangerous medical wastes once they receive them from the hospitals and health care facilities that generate the wastes.

(Opposed) If you apply a blanket presumption that facilities generating wastes are labeling correctly, it allows for improper mixing of wastes. This then allows for the waste processing facility to later dispose of the wastes in improper ways. This bill removes responsibility for waste-handling facilities. Dangerous waste rules are in place to ensure that toxic and other dangerous substances are closely managed from cradle to grave in order to protect public health and safety. A dialogue process with stakeholders on how to improve technical compliance with dangerous waste laws should take place before beginning a negotiated rulemaking. This bill would require the Department to ignore violations of federal hazardous waste-handling laws, which could threaten federal delegation to implement the hazardous waste program.

Persons Testifying: (In support) Selin Hoboy and Lisa Thatcher, Stericycle.

(Opposed) K Seiler, Department of Ecology.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.