SENATE BILL REPORT

SB 6242

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As of February 3, 2016

Title: An act relating to the indeterminate sentence review board.

Brief Description: Requiring the indeterminate sentence review board to provide certain notices upon receiving a petition for early release.

Sponsors: Senators O'Ban, Pedersen, Padden, Roach, Hargrove, Pearson, Darneille, Frockt and Sheldon.

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Law & Justice: 1/18/16.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON LAW & JUSTICE

Staff: Lindsay Erickson (786-7465)

Background: The Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (ISRB) was created in 1986. Prior to that time, the ISRB had been the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles. The ISRB has been given authority over the release and supervision of the following types of offenders:

The ISRB is located in Olympia and merged with the Department of Corrections on July 1, 2011. The Chair and three Board Members are appointed by the Governor to serve five year terms. Staff support the ISRB by providing case analysis, maintaining offender records, and providing administrative assistance to the Chair and the Board Members.

Summary of Bill: Notice. When the ISRB receives a petition for early release submitted under RCW 9.94A.730, the ISRB must provide notice and a copy of the petition to the sentencing court, prosecuting attorney, and the crime victim. The ISRB must also provide any assessment, psychological evaluation, institutional behavior record, or other examination of the offender to the sentencing court, prosecuting attorney, and the crime victim. Notice of the early release hearing date, and any evaluations or information relevant to the release decision, must be provided at least 90 days before the early release hearing. These records and other records reviewed by the ISRB in response to the petition must be disclosed in full and without redaction. Copies of records to be provided to named parties must be provided as required without regard to whether the ISRB has received a request for copies.

Public Records Exemption.

During a petition for early release review by the ISRB, it is presumed that none of the records reviewed are exempt from public inspection and copying, in whole or in part, under the Public Records Act or other state or federal law. The ISRB may not claim any exemption from public inspection or copying for the records reviewed for an early release petition.

Video Recordings and Minutes.

The ISRB and its committees must:

  1. video record all meetings and hearings relating to a petition for early release;

  2. provide comprehensive minutes of all related meetings and hearings on a petition for early release, which should include, but not be limited to:

    1. the ISRB members who are present;

    2. the name of the petitioner seeking review;

    3. the purpose and date of the meeting or hearing;

    4. a listing of documents reviewed;

    5. the names of members of the public who testify;

    6. a summary of discussion;

    7. the motions or other actions taken; and

    8. the votes of ISRB members by name; and

  3. post the videos and comprehensive minutes publicly and conspicuously on the ISRB's web site within 30 days of the meeting or hearing, without information withheld or redacted.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: The bill contains an emergency clause and takes effect immediately.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: This bill is a result of a work session in which victims and their families expressed frustration over the ISRB lack of notification pertaining to petitions for release. The ISRB was originally designed to cover a carryover caseload, but the intent was to phase out the ISRB over time. Now, more cases are coming under the ISRB jurisdiction due to the sex offender determinate plus population and the offenders who were under the age of 18 at the time they committed a crime and who are subject to a mandatory review of their sentences after 20 years. Prosecutors need notice of these hearings so they can be of assistance to the ISRB and victims. Prosecutors have access to important case documents, victim advocacy resources, and they often maintain contact with victims and can assist with involving them in the ISRB process. Prosecutors are interested in ISRB transparency and need more than just notice, they need access to the unredacted materials as well.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator O'Ban, prime sponsor; Jon Tunheim, WA Assoc. of Prosecuting Attorneys (WAPA); Jon Meyer, WAPA.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: No one.