HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2646
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent. |
As Reported by House Committee On:
Transportation
Title: An act relating to facilitating transportation projects of statewide significance.
Brief Description: Facilitating transportation projects of statewide significance.
Sponsors: Representatives Wylie, Stonier, Tharinger, Clibborn, McBride, Harris, Macri, Cody, Tarleton, Appleton, Ortiz-Self and Slatter.
Brief History:
Committee Activity:
Transportation: 1/24/18, 1/31/18 [DP].
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION |
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 14 members: Representatives Clibborn, Chair; Fey, Vice Chair; Wylie, Vice Chair; Chapman, Gregerson, Kloba, Lovick, McBride, Morris, Ortiz-Self, Pellicciotti, Riccelli, Tarleton and Valdez.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 8 members: Representatives Hargrove, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Harmsworth, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Hayes, Irwin, Pike, Shea, Van Werven and Young.
Minority Report: Without recommendation. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Orcutt, Ranking Minority Member; Stambaugh.
Staff: David Munnecke (786-7315).
Background:
In 1997 a process was enacted to expedite the development of industrial projects of statewide significance. To qualify for designation as a project of statewide significance, a project must meet capital investment or job creation requirements. Border-crossing projects, private projects investing in manufacturing or research and development, projects that will provide a net environmental benefit, and projects that will further commercialization of an innovation may all be designated as projects of statewide significance. An application for designation as a project of statewide significance must be submitted to the Department of Commerce. The application must include a letter of approval from jurisdictions where a project is located and must commit to providing the local staff necessary to expedite the completion of a project.
Counties and cities requesting a project's designation as one of statewide significance must ensure the participation of local officials on the public-private team expediting a project's completion. The Office of Regulatory Assistance must provide facilitation and coordination services to expedite completion of industrial projects of statewide significance. The project proponents may provide the funding necessary for the local jurisdiction to hire the staff required to expedite the process.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Summary of Bill:
Project Criteria.
A transportation project of statewide significance is defined as a project that will:
improve accessibility for a significant number of Washington residents;
improve the reliability of commute times for residents of the area;
improve the movement of freight through the corridor;
provide safety improvements and contribute to a reduction in injuries and fatalities;
maximize opportunities for economic development in the region;
make improvement to transit, pedestrian, and bike access; and
serve as a critical route for both national and state defense.
A transportation project of statewide significance must also be valued in excess of $1billion, and provide the direct employment of at least 1,500 persons over the life of the project.
Application and Application Process.
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) must develop the application for designating a transportation project as a transportation project of statewide significance. The WSDOT may designate a transportation project as a transportation project of statewide significance, upon review of an application and determination that it meets the criteria specified in statute and in rule.
An application to designate a transportation project as a transportation project of statewide significance must indicate how the project meets the criteria for a transportation project of statewide significance, as well as any other information required by the WSDOT. Such an application must also be accompanied by a letter of approval from each jurisdiction in which the project will be located, which must indicate support for the designation and that the jurisdiction has or will hire staff to expedite the project. Project proponents may provide funding for the hiring of such staff.
The Legislature may designate a transportation project as a transportation project of statewide significance. Such a project is not required to have an application or go through the application process.
Project Facilitation.
The WSDOT is required to assign a project facilitator or coordinator to every transportation project of statewide significance. This individual must assemble a team of state government, local government, and private officials to help meet the planning, permitting, and development needs of the project. The team must include those responsible for: (1) planning, permitting, and licensing; (2) infrastructure development; (3) workforce development services, including higher education; (4) transportation services; and (5) the provision of utilities. The project facilitator or coordinator must also work with each team member to expedite their actions in furtherance of the project and coordinate any cross border communications, if applicable.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Preliminary fiscal note available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This bill would provide a method to signal the importance of certain projects. It would also designate certain projects as ones that the WSDOT is responsible for rather than the Department of Commerce, as is the case with the current projects of statewide significance statute.
This bill would be beneficial to southwest Washington, as well as the rest of the state. Coordination is key for all projects, and this bill would allow large projects to be expedited. However, it might be appropriate to broaden the criteria for designation.
The Interstate 5 (I-5) corridor will continue to have increased congestion, and new projects will be needed to resolve this problem. The bill would allow for coordination to occur at the beginning of the project, and there is value in both coordination and streamlining.
The biggest negative impact on livability in Vancouver and Clark County is I-5 bridge congestion. The current infrastructure is inadequate to handle the number of people that wish to use it.
A signal must be sent to Oregon that Washington is serious about solving congestion problems.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Wylie, prime sponsor; Amber Carter, Port of Vancouver; Ron Arp, Identity Clark County; Helen Devery, BergerABAM; Ryan Davis, Clark County Association of Realtors; Ron Onslow, City of Ridgefield and the Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council; and Mike Ennis, Association of Washington Business.
Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.