SENATE BILL REPORT

ESHB 1813

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As of March 29, 2019

Title: An act relating to incorporating the costs of employee health benefits into school district contracts for pupil transportation.

Brief Description: Incorporating the costs of employee health benefits into school district contracts for pupil transportation.

Sponsors: House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Sullivan, Santos, Ortiz-Self and Ormsby).

Brief History: Passed House: 3/08/19, 56-39.

Committee Activity: Early Learning & K-12 Education: 3/25/19.

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Requires that school district contracts for pupil transportation services must include sufficient funds to provide employees of the contracting employer with health benefit and pension contributions equivalent to those of school district employees.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON EARLY LEARNING & K-12 EDUCATION

Staff: Alex Fairfortune (786-7416)

Background: Transportation Funding. The state's program of basic education includes transportation for some students to and from school. Funding allocations for pupil transportation are based on a combination of prior year allocations and district expenditures, and a regression analysis of student transport numbers and district characteristics that is used to estimate expected transport costs. For purposes of establishing a school district's independent variable for the regression analysis, allowable employee compensation costs are limited to base salary and benefit rates as provided in the budget.

Private Contracts. School districts may contract with private nongovernmental entities for pupil transportation services, provided that the district engages in an open competitive process for the services at least once every five years.

School Employee Benefits. In 2017 the Legislature created the School Employees Benefits Board (SEBB). Beginning January 1, 2020, all public schools must provide health care and related benefits to employees through the SEBB program, administered by the Health Care Authority. The state allocates funding to each school district for employee fringe benefits, such as health care, and for the cost to districts of covering retiree health care for state-funded K-12 staff units. Health benefits funding under the SEBB program is bargained between the Governor or the Governor's designee and one coalition of all of the exclusive bargaining representatives impacted by benefit purchasing with the SEBB.

Classified school employees are provided pension benefits through the School Employees' Retirement System, administered by the Department of Retirement Systems. For the 2019-21 fiscal biennium, the Pension Funding Council adopted an employer contribution rate of 13.01 percent and an employee contribution rate of 8.25 percent.

Summary of Bill: Between the effective date of the bill and December 31, 2019, any pupil transportation services contract must include:

Beginning January 1, 2020, any pupil transportation services contract must include:

"Employees of the contractor" is defined as employees working sufficient compensated hours for the contracting employer performing services on the contract with the school district to meet the eligibility requirements for SEBB if the employee was employed directly by the school district.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available. New fiscal note requested on March 12, 2019.

Creates Committee/Commission/Task Force that includes Legislative members: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: Contracting school bus drivers have been shorted for years on the amount of money they receive. Money is provided to districts but it does not reflect back in the medical benefits the drivers receive from the contractor. There is a constant fight to keep school bus drivers because many leave to work for school districts that have great benefits. This should be a specification of the RFP process, just like anything else a contractor must provide.

CON: This will substantially increase costs for school districts. The money would be taken from local levy funds, resulting in reductions to staffing, materials, and supplies. For Battle Ground School Districts, the increase in cost would be $2.6 million. Transportation is already underfunded, and with 2020 being a 45 percent lower collection amount than 2018 with local levies, there will need to be reductions to important school programs. This is in addition to the financial burden of implementing SEBB. The bill is technically and administratively unworkable. The bill requires that districts include sufficient funds to pay SEBB, but it does not require the contractor to actually provide the contribution to employees. It does not improve safety, student success, or special education funding. If this expectation is set, would it soon be applicable to other contractors like food services as well?

Persons Testifying: PRO: Abe Taylor, Teamsters 174; Joyce Hiatt, Teamsters 174. CON: Fred Yancey, Washington Association of School Administrators; Meagan Hayden, Battle Ground School District and Chief Financial Officer; Michelle Scott, Hockinson School District Director of Business Services; Brian Sims, Washington State School Directors Association.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: No one.