SENATE BILL REPORT

HB 1918

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Passed Senate, April 13, 2019

Title: An act relating to community preservation and development authorities.

Brief Description: Concerning community preservation and development authorities.

Sponsors: Representative Santos.

Brief History: Passed House: 3/09/19, 96-0.

Committee Activity: Local Government: 3/21/19, 3/26/19 [DP].

Floor Activity:

Passed Senate: 4/13/19, 45-0.

Brief Summary of Bill

  • Adds definitions to clarify what a Community Preservation and Development Authority (CPDA) is.

  • Adds that proposals for CPDAs after 2020 may include a revenue source with a nexus to land use decisions as well as publicly funded facilities.

  • Changes the way the initial board of a newly created CPDA is formed—from a list of candidates submitted by a legislative delegation to direct appointment by that delegation.

  • Authorizes the formation of a Central District CPDA within the city of Seattle.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Majority Report: Do pass.

Signed by Senators Takko, Chair; Salomon, Vice Chair; Short, Ranking Member; Honeyford and Lovelett.

Staff: Bonnie Kim (786-7316)

Background: Community Preservation and Development Authorities. Residents, property owners, employees, or business owners of an impacted community may propose formation of a CPDA. The proposal must be presented in writing to the appropriate committees of the Legislature and must contain proposed general geographic boundaries of the CPDA. Proposals submitted after January 1, 2008 must identify one or more stable revenue sources that:

A CPDA must be authorized by statute. The Legislature must make the following findings before authorizing a CPDA in statute:

The affairs of a CPDA are managed by a board of directors with members consisting of representatives from specified groups. A list of candidates for the initial board of directors is created by the state legislative delegation and those proposing the authority. The community then elects board members from that list. The board of directors creates a list of candidates for subsequent boards and the community elects members from that list.

Powers and Duties. A CPDA has the power to:

A CPDA has the duty to:

Summary of Bill: A CPDA must have one or more of the following purposes:

The following definitions apply to establishment of CPDAs:

Proposals for the creation of a CPDA presented after January 1, 2020, rather than 2008, must identify one or more stable revenue sources that have a nexus with multiple publicly funded facilities or other land use decisions that adversely impacted the community and can be used to support future operating or capital projects.

The initial board of directors of a CPDA is selected by a committee comprised of the state legislative delegation and those proposing formation of the authority rather than by election.

The Central District CPDA is established. Its boundaries are those contained in the Central District in Seattle.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Creates Committee/Commission/Task Force that includes Legislative members: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: In 2007, the Governor vetoed the intent and a definition section of the original enacting legislation. This bill creates a state agency to steward a state-owned asset. The central area of Seattle is a historical and significant area. The Seattle Vocational Institute is in great disrepair with over $26 million in deferred maintenance costs. This community is seeking to restore this very historically significant building. The McKinney Coalition represents a very large constituency and is active in our community. In 1991, SOIC needed a new steward and SVI was appointed. Maintenance has been insufficient and mainly tuition-supported. This effort represents the work of several partners representing a broad base of constituents. It is important to preserve this building in accordance with the original intent.

OTHER: We want to make sure we have a community development authority that is comprised of the very best people. However, the Legislature is disconnected and removed from the community. This bill should return the vote of initial board members to the community just as Pioneer Square had it. The work of the SVI has not been representative of other cultural organizations in our community. It is very important that the constituent vote which is stricken from the bill be restored to ensure the future of our community.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Representative Sharon Tomiko Santos, Prime Sponsor; Eddie Rye Jr., McKinney Coaltion; Steve Leahy, Director, Government Relations, Seattle Community Colleges; Lynn French, Business Development, LLC. OTHER: Dawn Mason, Former State Representative 37th; K. Wyking Garrett, Africatown Central District Preservation & Development Association.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: No one.