It is unlawful for any person, partnership, society, association, or corporation, except the parents, to assume the permanent care and custody of a child.  Unless otherwise permitted by court order or statute, it is unlawful for any parent to relinquish or transfer to another person, partnership, society, association, or corporation the permanent care and custody of any child for adoption or any other purpose.  A violation of these prohibitions is a gross misdemeanor.
 
The Uniform Law Commission (ULC) is a state-supported, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that drafts and proposes specific statutory language that may be adopted by states.  In 2021, the ULC drafted the Uniform Unregulated Child Custody Transfer Act (Act) to prevent situations in which birth or adoptive parents would transfer custody of their child to another person outside of the child welfare system.
 
The Act provides a uniform legal framework to prohibit unregulated child custody transfers.  An unregulated child custody transfer is a transfer by a parent or guardian of a child or an individual with whom a child has been placed for adoption that is performed without state agency or court oversight that assures the new custodian is safe and appropriate for the child.  The provisions have not been adopted in any other state.

A parent, guardian, or individual with whom a child has been placed for adoption may transfer custody of the child to another person with intent to abandon the rights and responsibilities concerning the child only through adoption or guardianship, judicial award of custody, placement by or through a child-placing agency, other judicial or tribal action, or transfer of a newborn to a qualified person.
 
It is a gross misdemeanor for a parent or guardian with custody of a child, as well as an individual with whom a child has been placed for adoption, to transfer custody of a child to someone beyond family members and other specified categories of individuals if the parent, guardian, or individual with whom a child has been placed for adoption intends to abandon their rights and responsibilities regarding the child.
 
A person may not receive custody of a child, or act as an intermediary in a transfer of custody of child, if the person knows, or reasonably should know, the transfer is in violation of the prohibitions, unless a person notifies the Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF) or law enforcement as soon as practicable after the transfer, or takes appropriate action to establish custody.  A violation is a gross misdemeanor.
 
DCYF has the authority to investigate probable violations of the act and to take appropriate action to protect the child and the authority to perform home visits for adopted children or children placed through an intercountry adoption.
 
Unauthorized solicitation and advertising for the purpose of transferring or finding a child to transfer in violation of the act constitutes an unfair or deceptive act or practice in trade or commerce.
 
The prohibitions of the Act apply to transfers of custody and unauthorized solicitations or advertisements on or after the effective date of this act.

PRO:  This uniform act was developed by the Uniform Law Commission by request from the United States Department of State after a number of cases where parents of international adoptees with significant behavioral problems tried to re-home these adoptees and some adoptees were trafficked.  Washington is a leader in adoption-related legislation.  Most of the substance in this bill has been in state statute for many years, but there is still great value in having uniformity in the laws, especially for interstate adoption.  This bill will also cover non-adoption-related custody transfers.

OTHER:  The intent of the bill is appreciated, but there are a number of concerns with some of the details in the bill.  The exception that parents can leave children in the care of an adult who had a close relationship with the child or guardian is too broad.  This might allow things that the bill is trying to prevent.  There also does not appear to be an exception to allow homeless youth to live in host homes.  Additionally, search engines and online advertisers might be inadvertently liable for displaying prohibited advertisements that they did not affirmatively post.