The Office of Public Guardianship.
Established in 2007, the Office of Public Guardianship (OPG) within the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) contracts with certified professional guardians and conservators to provide public guardianship, conservatorship, decision-making assistance, and estate administration service to low-income adults who need these services and for whom there is no one else qualified who is willing and able to serve.  
 
"Decision-making assistance" means support for an individual with diminished decision-making ability in making decisions affecting health or safety or to manage financial affairs.  Assistance includes, but is not limited to, acting as a representative payee, an agent, a trustee, a public guardian, or a public conservator. 
 
To be eligible for the public services provided by the OPG, an adult must have an income of less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level or be receiving long-term care services through the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS).  
 
The OPG must adopt and maintain eligibility criteria to enable it to serve individuals with the greatest need when the number of cases in which courts propose to appoint a public guardian or conservator exceeds the number of cases in which services can be provided.  In adopting such criteria, the OPG may consider factors including, but not limited to, the following:

• whether an individual with diminished decision-making ability is at significant risk of harm from abuse, exploitation, abandonment, neglect, or self-neglect; and
• whether an individual with diminished decision-making ability is in imminent danger of loss or significant reduction in public services that are necessary for the individual to live successfully in the most integrated and least restrictive environment that is appropriate in light of the individual's needs and values.  

The OPG must identify training needs for contract service providers it contracts with and make recommendations to the Washington Supreme Court, the Certified Professional Guardianship and Conservatorship Board, and the Legislature for improvements in training.  The OPG may offer training to individuals who are likely to provide such services in the future, to lay guardians or conservators, and to the family and friends of individuals subject to guardianship or conservatorship.
 
The OPG is prohibited from petitioning for appointment of a public guardian or conservator for any individual.
 
The Uniform Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Other Protective Arrangements Act.
Enacted in 2019, the Uniform Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Other Protective Arrangements Act (UGA) took effect in 2021 and replaced previous statutory provisions related to guardianship and third-party custody.  The UGA covers guardianships, conservatorships, and protective arrangements for both minors and adults.  
 
Throughout the UGA, the term "guardian" refers to a person appointed by a court to make decisions about the care and well-being of another person.  The term "conservator" refers to a person appointed by a court to manage the property of another person.  The term "respondent" means an individual for whom appointment of a guardian or conservator or a protective arrangement instead of guardianship or conservatorship is sought.
 
Legal Basis for Appointment of a Guardian or Conservator.
The court may appoint a guardian for an adult if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that:

• the respondent lacks the ability to meet essential requirements for physical health, safety, or self-care because the respondent is unable to receive and evaluate information or make or communicate decisions, even with appropriate supportive services, technological assistance, or supported decision making;
• appointment is necessary to prevent significant risk of harm to the adult respondent's physical health, safety, or self-care; and
• the respondent's identified needs cannot be met by a protective arrangement instead of guardianship or other less restrictive alternative.  

A determination by the court that a basis exists for the appointment of a guardian or conservator and on the issue of the rights that will be retained or restricted by the appointment of a guardian or conservator is a legal decision, not a medical decision.  
 
The determination must be based on a demonstration of management insufficiencies over time in the area of physical health, safety, or self-care, if a guardianship is sought, and in the area of financial affairs if a conservatorship is sought.  
 
Age, eccentricity, poverty, or medical diagnosis alone is not sufficient basis to justify a determination that a guardian or conservator should be appointed for the respondent.
 
The court must grant a guardian or conservator only those powers necessitated by the demonstrated needs and limitations of the respondent and issue orders that will encourage development of the respondent's maximum self-determination and independence.
 
An adult respondent may demand a jury trial on the issue of whether a basis exists for the appointment of a guardian or conservator and on the rights to be retained or restricted if a guardian or conservator is appointed.
 
Qualifications of a Guardian or Conservator.
Any person over the age of 21 years may be appointed a guardian or conservator.  If a guardian or conservator is not a certified professional guardian or conservator, the guardian or conservator must complete standardized training made available by the AOC.  
 
 A person is not qualified to serve as a guardian or conservator if the person is:

• under 18 years of age, except as otherwise provided in the UGA;
• convicted of a crime involving dishonesty, neglect, or use of physical force or other relevant crime, except that a court may, upon consideration of the facts, find that a relative convicted of a crime is qualified to serve as a guardian or conservator; or
• found unsuitable by the court.  

Petition for a Guardian or Conservator.
Any individual or entity interested in an adult's welfare, including the adult, may petition for appointment of a guardian for the adult.  A petition for appointment of a conservator may be filed by the individual for whom the appointment is sought, the individual's guardian, or any individual or entity interested in the individual's estate, financial affairs, or welfare, including a person that would be adversely affected by lack of effective management of the individual's property or financial affairs.
 
The petition must specify the nature and extent of the respondent's alleged need, the reason guardianship or conservatorship is necessary, and the reason a protective arrangement instead of guardianship or conservatorship or other less restrictive alternative is insufficient to meet the respondent's alleged need.
 
If no person is identified to be appointed guardian or conservator at the time the petition is filed, then the court must require that the petitioner identify within 14 days from the filing a specific individual to act as a guardian, subject to the training requirements.
 
All petitions for appointment of a guardian or conservator for an adult must be heard within 60 days unless an extension is requested by a party or the court visitor within the 60-day period and granted for good cause shown.
 
If the court dismisses a petition and determines the petition was filed in bad faith, the court may assess the cost of any court-ordered professional evaluation or court visitor against the petitioner.
 
Court Visitor.
On receipt of a petition for a guardianship or conservatorship for an adult, the court must appoint a court visitor, who must be an individual with training or experience in the type of abilities, limitations, and needs alleged in the petition.  The appointment of a court visitor has no effect on the determination of the adult respondent's legal capacity and does not overcome the presumption of legal capacity or full legal and civil rights of the adult respondent.  
 
A court visitor must interview the respondent in person and, in a manner the respondent is best able to understand:

• explain to the respondent:  the substance of the petition; the nature, purpose, and effect of the proceeding; the respondent's rights at the hearing on the petition; and the general powers and duties of a guardian or conservator;
• determine the respondent's views about the appointment sought by the petitioner, including views about a proposed guardian or conservator, and the proposed powers and duties of a guardian or conservator; and
• inform the respondent that all costs and expenses of the proceeding, including the respondent's attorney's fees, may be paid from the respondent's assets.

Additionally, a court visitor must:  interview the petitioner and proposed guardian or conservator, obtain information from any person known to have treated or assessed the respondent's relevant physical or mental condition, review the respondent's financial records, and investigate the allegations in the petition and any other matter as directed by the court.
 
At least 15 days prior to the hearing on the petition, the court visitor must file a report in a record with the court, which must include specified information, including a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of guardianship or conservatorship and whether a protective arrangement instead of guardianship or conservatorship or other less restrictive alternative for meeting the respondent's needs is available.
 
Guardian's or Conservator's Report.
A guardian for an adult or a conservator must file with the court periodic reports regarding the condition of the adult and administration of the conservatorship estate.  The report must contain specified information and include a recommendation as to the need for continued guardianship or conservatorship and any recommended change in the scope of the guardianship or conservatorship.
 
If the court approves the report, the court must reissue letters of office to the guardian or conservator containing an expiration date within 180 days after the date the court directs the guardian or conservator to file its next report. 
 
Supported Decision-Making Agreements.
Under the UGA, all adults are presumed to be capable of managing their affairs, and the manner in which an adult communicates with others is not grounds for deciding that the adult is incapable of managing the adult's affairs.  The UGA was amended in 2020 to create a less restrictive alternative to guardianship for adults with disabilities who need assistance with decisions regarding daily living.
 
A supported decision-making agreement is a written agreement entered into voluntarily by an adult with a disability and a supporter.  Execution of a supported decision-making agreement may not be used as evidence for the petition or appointment of a guardian or conservator, and it does not preclude the ability of the adult who has entered into the agreement to act independently of the agreement.
 
The supporter is authorized to provide supported decision-making without making decisions on behalf of the adult with a disability; assist the adult in accessing, collecting, obtaining, and understanding information relevant to a life decision; and assist the adult in communicating decisions to appropriate persons.
 
Unless the supporter is an immediate family member of the adult, the supporter may not be an employer or employee of the adult, or a person directly providing paid support services to the adult.  An individual is disqualified from acting as a supporter if the individual is the subject of a civil or criminal order prohibiting contact with the adult, or if the adult obtains an order of protection from abuse against the individual.

The amended bill requires the OPG to submit a report to the Legislature by October 1, 2025, and annually thereafter, and to provide specified information, including information about hospitalized persons prioritized for the public services provided by the OPG.