H-0378.3

HOUSE BILL 1237

State of Washington
69th Legislature
2025 Regular Session
ByRepresentatives Fitzgibbon, Berry, Fosse, Simmons, Duerr, Ormsby, Hill, and Tharinger
Prefiled 01/10/25.Read first time 01/13/25.Referred to Committee on Environment & Energy.
AN ACT Relating to facilitating predictable and timely application decisions by the energy facility site evaluation council; amending RCW 80.50.090 and 80.50.100; and repealing RCW 80.50.075 and 80.50.320.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1. RCW 80.50.090 and 2022 c 183 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) The council shall conduct an informational public hearing in the county of the proposed site as soon as practicable but not later than ((sixty))60 days after receipt of an application for site certification. However, the place of such public hearing shall be as close as practical to the proposed site.
(2) Subsequent to the informational public hearing, the council shall conduct a public hearing to determine whether or not the proposed site is consistent and in compliance with city, county, or regional land use plans or zoning ordinances on the date of the application.
(3)(a) After the submission of an environmental checklist and prior to issuing a threshold determination that a facility is likely to cause a significant adverse environmental impact under chapter 43.21C RCW, the director must notify the project applicant and explain in writing the basis for its anticipated determination of significance. Prior to issuing the threshold determination of significance, the director must give the project applicant the option of withdrawing and revising its application and the associated environmental checklist to clarify or make changes to features of the proposal that are designed to mitigate the impacts that were the basis of the director's anticipated determination of significance. The director shall make the threshold determination based upon the changed or clarified proposal following the applicant's submittal. The director must provide an opportunity for public comment on a project for which a project applicant has withdrawn and revised the application and environmental checklist and subsequently received a threshold determination of nonsignificance or mitigated determination of nonsignificance.
(b) The notification required under (a) of this subsection is not an official determination by the director and is not subject to appeal under chapter 43.21C RCW.
(4) ((Prior to the issuance of a council recommendation to the governor under RCW 80.50.100))If the council determines under subsection (2) of this section that the proposed site is inconsistent or not in compliance with applicable land use plans or zoning ordinances on the date of application, a public hearing, conducted as an adjudicative proceeding under chapter 34.05 RCW, the administrative procedure act, shall be held prior to the issuance of a council recommendation to the governor under RCW 80.50.100.
(((a) At such public hearing any person shall be entitled to be heard in support of or in opposition to the application for certification by raising one or more specific issues, provided that the person has raised the issue or issues in writing with specificity during the application review process or during the public comment period that will be held prior to the start of the adjudicative hearing.
(b) If the environmental impact of the proposed facility in an application for certification is not significant or will be mitigated to a nonsignificant level under RCW 43.21C.031, the council may limit the topic of the public hearing conducted as an))The adjudicative proceeding ((under this section to))shall consider whether any land use plans or zoning ordinances with which the proposed site is determined to be inconsistent under subsection (2) of this section should be preempted.
(5) ((After expedited processing is granted under RCW 80.50.075, the))The council must hold a public ((meeting))hearing to take comments on the proposed application after the issuance of a final environmental impact statement, if any, and prior to issuing a council recommendation to the governor.
(6) Additional public hearings shall be held as deemed appropriate by the council in the exercise of its functions under this chapter.
Sec. 2. RCW 80.50.100 and 2022 c 183 s 10 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)(a) The council shall report to the governor its recommendations as to the approval or rejection of an application for certification within ((twelve))12 months of receipt by the council of an application deemed complete by the director, or such later time as is mutually agreed by the council and the applicant.
(b) The council shall review and consider comments received during the application process in making its recommendation.
(c) In the case of an application filed prior to December 31, 2025, for certification of an energy facility proposed for construction, modification, or expansion for the purpose of providing generating facilities that meet the requirements of RCW 80.80.040 and are located in a county with a coal-fired electric generation facility subject to RCW 80.80.040(3)(c), the council shall expedite the processing of the application ((pursuant to RCW 80.50.075)) and shall report its recommendations to the governor within ((one hundred eighty))180 days of receipt by the council of such an application, or a later time as is mutually agreed by the council and the applicant.
(2) If the council recommends approval of an application for certification, it shall also submit a draft certification agreement with the report. The council shall include conditions in the draft certification agreement to implement the provisions of this chapter including, but not limited to, conditions to protect state, local governmental, or community interests, or overburdened communities as defined in RCW 70A.02.010 affected by the construction or operation of the facility, and conditions designed to recognize the purpose of laws or ordinances, or rules or regulations promulgated thereunder, that are preempted or superseded pursuant to RCW 80.50.110 as now or hereafter amended.
(3)(a) The council shall recommend that the governor approve an application for an alternative energy resource, a clean energy manufacturing facility, a biofuel production facility, a fusion energy facility, a storage facility, or an electric transmission facility if it determines that the preponderance of evidence on the record supports the following conclusions:
(i) The project provides public benefits that include:
(A) Contributions to meeting:
(I) The greenhouse gas emissions limits under RCW 70A.45.020;
(II) The requirements for the sale of greenhouse gas neutral electricity by 2030 and 100 percent nonemitting, electric generation and electricity from renewable resources by 2045 under RCW 19.405.040 and 19.405.050; or
(III) The state energy strategy prepared by the department of commerce;
(B) Public health, environmental, economic, and other benefits of greenhouse gas reductions, considering the social cost of carbon as determined under RCW 80.28.405;
(C) Tax benefits;
(D) Community benefits; and
(E) Creation of jobs;
(ii) The project avoids, minimizes, or mitigates, to the maximum extent practicable, significant adverse environmental impacts identified through review under chapter 43.21C RCW related to the siting, design, construction, and operation of the project;
(iii) The project avoids, minimizes, or mitigates to the maximum extent practicable, significant adverse impacts identified through review under chapter 43.21C RCW on historical, archaeological, and cultural resources;
(iv) The project avoids, minimizes, or mitigates to the maximum extent practicable, significant adverse impacts identified through review under chapter 43.21C RCW to threatened and endangered species;
(v) The applicant has taken measures to ensure that the project avoids, minimizes, or mitigates impacts to overburdened communities and vulnerable populations, as those terms are defined in RCW 70A.02.010, and that the project will provide benefits to overburdened communities and vulnerable populations in the vicinity of the project;
(vi) The project does not present an unreasonable threat to health and safety; and
(vii) The applicant has agreed to reasonable requirements for project decommissioning that ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that project components are reused, refurbished, or disposed of in a manner consistent with state and federal requirements for waste disposal or recycling, and that lands affected by the project are restored to their pre-project condition to the maximum extent practicable.
(b) For purposes of this subsection (3), the council's determination of what is practicable must include consideration of economic viability.
(4)(a) Within 60 days of receipt of the council's report the governor shall take one of the following actions:
(i) Approve the application and execute the draft certification agreement; or
(ii) Reject the application; or
(iii) Direct the council to reconsider certain aspects of the draft certification agreement.
(b) The council shall reconsider such aspects of the draft certification agreement by reviewing the existing record of the application or, as necessary, by reopening the adjudicative proceeding for the purposes of receiving additional evidence. Such reconsideration shall be conducted expeditiously. The council shall resubmit the draft certification to the governor incorporating any amendments deemed necessary upon reconsideration. Within 60 days of receipt of such draft certification agreement, the governor shall either approve the application and execute the certification agreement or reject the application. The certification agreement shall be binding upon execution by the governor and the applicant.
(((4)))(5) The rejection of an application for certification by the governor shall be final as to that application but shall not preclude submission of a subsequent application for the same site on the basis of changed conditions or new information.
NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3. The following acts or parts of acts are each repealed:
(1) RCW 80.50.075 (Expedited processing of applications) and 2022 c 183 s 18, 2006 c 205 s 2, 1989 c 175 s 172, & 1977 ex.s. c 371 s 17; and
(2) RCW 80.50.320 (Governor to evaluate council efficiency, make recommendations) and 2001 c 214 s 8.
--- END ---