H-1688              _______________________________________________

 

                                                   HOUSE BILL NO. 1113

                        _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington                              49th Legislature                              1985 Regular Session

 

By Representatives Todd, Long, Ebersole, Wang, Valle, Rayburn, Peery and Holland

 

 

Read first time 2/8/85 and referred to Committee on Education.

 

 


AN ACT Relating to teacher compensation and evaluation; amending RCW 28A.67.065; creating new sections; making an appropriation; and providing an expiration date.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.     The teaching profession is crucial to the well-being of the state.  Studies have shown, however, that teachers are not always compensated at a level commensurate with their education and responsibilities.  Studies have also shown that the teaching profession is not as attractive to college students as it was at one time.  Improved compensation and recognizing excellent educators are commonly suggested solutions to the recent decline in interest in teaching as a profession.  However, any satisfactory system must also have an effective evaluation system in place.  Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature to investigate methods for improving the conditions of the teaching profession, including creating an effective evaluation system.

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.     The superintendent of public instruction shall study and report back to the legislature its recommendations for a performance-based compensation system for teachers.  The study shall include an analysis of research and information available from other states and from the business community. The study shall also include pilot programs in districts throughout the state which volunteer to experiment with a variety of performance-based compensation plans.  The projects shall include at a minimum a regular evaluation process by trained evaluators and providing assistance to teachers who show weaknesses in instructional skills.  The superintendent shall consult with the state board of education and professional organizations representing teachers, administrators, school principals, and school directors during the study under this section.

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.     The superintendent of public instruction shall report interim findings to the legislature on the results of the study required by section 2 of this act not later than January 1, 1987, and shall make its final report to the legislature not later than January 1, 1988.

 

        Sec. 4.  Section 22, chapter 34, Laws of 1969 ex. sess. as last amended by section 3, chapter 114, Laws of 1975-'76 2nd ex. sess. and RCW 28A.67.065 are each amended to read as follows:

          (1) The superintendent of public instruction shall, on or before January 1, 1977, establish and may amend from time to time minimum criteria for the evaluation of the professional performance capabilities and development of certificated classroom teachers and certificated support personnel.  ((For classroom teachers the criteria shall be developed in the following categories:  Instructional skill; classroom management, professional preparation and scholarship; effort toward improvement when needed; the handling of student discipline and attendant problems; and interest in teaching pupils and knowledge of subject matter.  Such criteria shall be subject to review by November 1, 1976, by four members of the legislature, one from each caucus of each house, including the chairpersons of the respective education committees)) The minimum criteria for evaluation shall include:  (a) A statement of the purpose of evaluations; (b) the frequency of evaluations, with recognition of the need for more frequent evaluations for beginning teachers; (c) the areas of evaluation including instructional skills and techniques, knowledge and use of resources, classroom management, human relations, knowledge of learning and students, and professional growth; (d) the conduct of the evaluation; (e) the procedure to be used in making the evaluation; and (f) the use of the results of the evaluation.

          Every board of directors shall, in accordance with procedure provided in RCW 41.59.010 through 41.59.170, 41.59.910 and 41.59.920, establish evaluative criteria and procedures for all certificated classroom teachers and certificated support personnel.  The evaluative criteria must contain as a minimum the criteria established by the superintendent of public instruction pursuant to this section and must be prepared within six months following adoption of the superintendent of public instruction's minimum criteria.  The district must certify to the superintendent of public instruction that evaluative criteria have been so prepared by the district.

          It shall be the responsibility of a principal or his or her designee to evaluate all certificated personnel in his or her school.  During each school year all classroom teachers and certificated support personnel, hereinafter referred to as "employees" in this section, shall be observed for the purposes of evaluation at least twice in the performance of their assigned duties.  Total observation time for each employee for each school year shall be not less than sixty minutes.  Following each observation, or series of observations, the principal or other evaluator shall promptly document the results of the evaluation in writing, and shall provide the employee with a copy thereof within three days after such report is prepared.  New employees shall be observed at least once for a total observation time of thirty minutes during the first ninety calendar days of their employment period.

          Every employee whose work is judged unsatisfactory based on district evaluation criteria shall be notified in writing of stated specific areas of deficiencies along with a suggested specific and reasonable program for improvement on or before February 1st of each year.  A probationary period shall be established beginning on or before February 1st and ending no later than May 1st.  The purpose of the probationary period is to give the employee opportunity to demonstrate improvements in his or her areas of deficiency.  The establishment of the probationary period and the giving of the notice to the employee of deficiency shall be by the school district superintendent and need not be submitted to the board of directors for approval.  During the probationary period the evaluator shall meet with the employee at least twice monthly to supervise and make a written evaluation of the progress, if any, made by the employee.  The evaluator may authorize one additional certificated employee to evaluate the probationer and to aid the employee in improving his or her areas of deficiency; such additional certificated employee shall be immune from any civil liability that might otherwise be incurred or imposed with regard to the good faith performance of such evaluation.  The probationer may be removed from probation if he or she has demonstrated improvement to the satisfaction of the principal in those areas specifically detailed in his or her initial notice of deficiency and subsequently detailed in his or her improvement program.  Lack of necessary improvement shall be specifically documented in writing with notification to the probationer and shall constitute grounds for a finding of probable cause under RCW 28A.58.450 or 28A.67.070, as now or hereafter amended.

          The establishment of a probationary period shall not be deemed to adversely affect the contract status of an employee within the meaning of RCW 28A.58.450, as now or hereafter amended.

          (2) Every board of directors shall establish evaluative criteria and procedures for all superintendents, principals, and other administrators.  It shall be the responsibility of the district superintendent or his or her designee to evaluate all administrators.  Such evaluation shall be based on the administrative position job description.  Such criteria, when applicable, shall include at least the following categories:  Knowledge of, experience in, and training in recognizing good professional performance, capabilities and development; school administration and management; school finance; professional preparation and scholarship; effort toward improvement when needed; interest in pupils, employees, patrons and subjects taught in school; leadership; and ability and performance of evaluation of school personnel.

          (3) Each certificated employee shall have the opportunity for confidential conferences with his or her immediate supervisor on no less than two occasions in each school year.  Such confidential conference shall have as its sole purpose the aiding of the administrator in his or her professional performance.

          (4) The failure of any evaluator to evaluate or supervise or cause the evaluation or supervision of certificated employees or administrators in accordance with this section, as now or hereafter amended, when it is his or her specific assigned or delegated responsibility to do so, shall be sufficient cause for the nonrenewal of any such evaluator's contract under RCW 28A.67.070, as now or hereafter amended, or the discharge of such evaluator under RCW 28A.58.450, as now or hereafter amended.

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5.     The sum of .......... dollars, or as much thereof as may be necessary, is appropriated for the biennium ending June 30, 1987, from the general fund to the superintendent of public instruction for the purposes of this act.

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.     Sections 2 and 3 of this act shall expire January 1, 1988.