H-3743              _______________________________________________

 

                                                   HOUSE BILL NO. 1958

                        _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington                              49th Legislature                              1986 Regular Session

 

By Representative McMullen

 

 

Read first time 1/24/86 and referred to Committee on Judiciary.

 

 


AN ACT Relating to juries; amending RCW 2.36.010, 2.36.050, 2.36.060, 2.36.063, 2.36.070, 2.36.093, and 2.36.100; and adding a new section to chapter 2.36 RCW.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

        Sec. 1.  Section 1, chapter 48, Laws of 1891 and RCW 2.36.010 are each amended to read as follows:

          A jury is a body of ((men)) persons temporarily selected from the qualified inhabitants of a particular district, and invested with power((‑-)):

          (1) To present or indict a person for a public offense.

          (2) To try a question of fact.

 

        Sec. 2.  Section 4, chapter 48, Laws of 1891 as last amended by section 6, chapter 162, Laws of 1980 and RCW 2.36.050 are each amended to read as follows:

          A petit jury is a body of persons twelve or less in number in the superior court and six in number in courts of limited jurisdiction; drawn in the superior court and in courts of limited jurisdiction by lot from the jurors in attendance upon the court at a particular session, and sworn to try and determine a question of fact.  In courts of limited jurisdiction, juries shall be selected and impaneled in the same manner as in the superior courts, except that a court of limited jurisdiction shall use the master jury list developed by the superior court judge or judges to select a jury panel.

 

        Sec. 3.  Section 3, chapter 57, Laws of 1911 as last amended by section 1, chapter 135, Laws of 1979 ex. sess. and RCW 2.36.060 are each amended to read as follows:

          The judge or judges of the superior court of each county shall divide the county into not less than three jury districts, following the lines of voting precincts and arranging the districts in such manner that the population in each district shall be as nearly equal as may be, and the fixing of the boundaries of the district shall be evidenced by an order made by the court and entered upon its records.

          The county auditor shall prepare annually from the original registration files of voters of the county a list according to a procedure or formula established by the judge or judges of the superior court for the selection of prospective jurors from the original registration files of voters.  The list shall be divided into the respective voting precincts and shall specify with respect to each name appearing on said list all the information upon the original registration card of each qualified voter.

          During the month of ((July)) December of each year, the judge or judges of the superior court for each county shall select by lot, in the manner hereinafter set forth, from said lists and from the original registration files of voters of the county, and enter in a book kept for that purpose and shall certify and file with the county clerk a jury list containing the names of a sufficient number of qualified persons to serve as jurors until the first day of ((August)) January of the next calendar year.  The judge or judges may call (but are not required to call) one or more electors from each or any of the jury districts to advise in the selection.  Each such elector shall receive for his services the sum of ten dollars per day and the mileage allowed sheriffs, upon vouchers approved by the judge or presiding judge of the county.  In making the selection of jurors the judge or judges shall be bound by the list of names filed with the county clerk as in this section provided.  At any time and from time to time the judges may add to the jury list in the same manner, and when this is done a certified list of the names added shall be filed with the clerk.

          The number of persons selected from the several jury districts shall be as nearly as possible in proportion to the number of names on the list certified and filed with the county clerk for the several districts.

          The county clerk shall provide boxes sufficient in number to correspond with the number of jury districts fixed by the court, and numbered to correspond therewith, and having written the names appearing in the jury list for each district upon slips of paper, which shall be similar in size, quality of paper, and writing, shall deposit such slips in the jury box of the proper district.  At the time of the drawing of names for any venire there must be in the jury boxes at least five times as many names as the number of names to be drawn.

          The jury list shall be selected by the judge or judges in the following manner:

          (1) The selection of precincts from which names are to be selected shall be by lot;

          (2) The number of jurors selected from each precinct selected under subsection (1) shall, insofar as practicable, be equal;

          (3) The selection of prospective jurors within a given precinct shall be by selection of names in a given and identical numbered sequence based upon the number of jurors to be selected therefrom.

 

        Sec. 4.  Section 1, chapter 13, Laws of 1973 2nd ex. sess. and RCW 2.36.063 are each amended to read as follows:

          The judge or judges of the superior court of any county may, if they so choose, by local superior court rule, employ a properly programmed electronic data processing system or device to make random selection of jurors as required  by RCW 2.36.060.

          Upon determination that such system shall be employed, the judge or judges of the superior court shall direct the county auditor to provide the names and other information concerning all registered voters which have been filed with him or her by the registrar  of voters pursuant to RCW 2.36.060.

          In those counties employing the electronic data processing random selection method, the judge or judges of the superior court may determine that fair and random selection may be achieved without division of the county into three or more jury districts.  Upon such determination, the judge or judges shall, during the month of ((July)) December each year, order a master jury list to be selected by an unrestricted random sample from the names of all registered voters filed with the county auditor, without regard to location of precinct.

          In those counties employing the electronic data processing random selection method, if the judge or judges of the superior court determine that the jury district procedure required for noncomputer jury selection is to be followed, the judge or judges shall divide the county into not less than three jury districts pursuant to RCW 2.36.060.  The judge or judges shall during the month of ((July)) December each year, order a master jury list to be selected by an unrestricted random sample from the names of all registered voters filed with the county auditor.  Such list must contain as nearly as possible an equal number of jurors from each jury district.

          The master jury list randomly selected shall contain names of a sufficient number of qualified voters to serve as jurors until the first day of ((August)) January of the next calendar year, and shall be certified and filed with the county clerk.  At any time the judge or judges may add to the jury list in the random selection manner by data process device as approved by the judge or judges.  A certified list of the added names shall be filed with the county clerk.

 

        Sec. 5.  Section 1, chapter 57, Laws of 1911 as last amended by section 1, chapter 203, Laws of 1975 1st ex. sess. and RCW 2.36.070 are each amended to read as follows:

          ((No)) Any person shall be competent to serve as a juror in the superior courts of the state of Washington ((unless he be)) except those:

          (1) ((an elector and taxpayer of the state,)) Less than eighteen years of age;

          (2) ((a)) Not residents of the county in which ((he)) the juror is called for service ((for more than one year preceding such time,));

          (3) ((in full possession of his faculties and of sound mind:  PROVIDED, That a person shall not be precluded from the list of prospective jurors because of loss of sight in any degree.  Sound mind, as used in this section, shall mean the necessary mental process utilized in reasoning to a logical conclusion, and)) Not citizens of the United States;

          (4) Not able to read and write the English language; or

          (5) Convicted of a felony and not having their civil rights restored.

 

        Sec. 6.  Section 2, chapter 13, Laws of 1973 2nd ex. sess. and RCW 2.36.093 are each amended to read as follows:

          At such time as the judge or judges of the superior court of any county shall deem that the public business requires a jury term to be held, he or they shall direct the county clerk to select jurors to serve for the ensuing term, pursuant to RCW 2.36.090.  In any county in which the judge or judges have chosen to employ the electronic data process random selection method as provided for in RCW 2.36.063, the county clerk shall within the first fifteen days of the calendar month preceding the month on which the jurors are to be called to serve, cause the names of the jurors to be selected from the master list of prospective jurors for the year placed on file in his office.

          The name of a person once selected for a jury term shall be excluded from selection of jurors for subsequent terms in that jury year unless otherwise ordered by the judge or judges of superior court:  PROVIDED, That at any time or for any period or periods of time, the judge or judges may direct by rule or order that all or any number or proportion of the jurors thereafter to be selected shall be selected to serve for two successive terms, to the end that not all of the jurors serving during a given period shall cease their service at the same time.

          The judge or judges of the superior court shall issue or cause to be issued a summons to jurors that shall be served by first class mail.

          It shall be the duty and responsibility of the judge or judges of the superior court to insure that such electronic data processing system or device is employed so as to insure continued random selection of the master jury list and jurors.  To that end, the judge or judges shall review the process from time to time and shall cause to be kept on file with the county clerk a description of the jury selection process.  Any person who desires may inspect this description in said office.

          Nothing in RCW 2.36.063 and 2.36.093 shall be construed as requiring uniform equipment or method throughout the state, so long as fair and random selection of the master jury list and jurors is achieved.

 

        Sec. 7.  Section 7, chapter 57, Laws of 1911 as last amended by section 1, chapter 181, Laws of 1983 and RCW 2.36.100 are each amended to read as follows:

          Except for a person who is not qualified for jury service under RCW 2.36.070, no person may be excused from jury service by the court except upon a showing of undue hardship, extreme inconvenience, public necessity, prior jury service ((twice)) once in the last ((five)) two years, or any reason deemed sufficient by the court for a period of time the court deems necessary.  An excuse for prior service shall apply only in class AA and class A counties, and shall be granted only upon the written request of the prospective juror, which request shall certify the terms of prior service.  Prior jury service may include service in superior court, a court of limited jurisdiction or in the United States District Court.

 

          NEW SECTION.  Sec. 8.  A new section is added to chapter 2.36 RCW to read as follows:

          (1) An employer shall not deprive or threaten to deprive an employee of his or her employment because the employee receives a summons, serves as a juror, or attends court for prospective jury service.

          (2) If an employer discharges an employee in violation of subsection (1) of this section, the employee may bring a civil action for recovery of wages lost as a result of the violation and for an order requiring reinstatement of the employee.  Damages recoverable shall not exceed lost wages for six weeks of employment.  In an action brought under this section, the employee shall recover reasonable attorneys' fees.