SENATE BILL REPORT

 

 

                                    EHB 396

 

 

BYRepresentatives Cantwell, Walk, K. Wilson, Meyers, Heavey, P. King and Todd

 

 

Authorizing counties and cities to establish transportation benefit districts.

 

 

House Committe on Transportation

 

 

Senate Committee on Transportation

 

      Senate Hearing Date(s):April 1, 1987

 

Majority Report:  Do pass as amended.

      Signed by Senators Peterson, Chairman; Tanner, Vice Chairman; Bailey, Barr, Bender, Conner, DeJarnatt, Garrett, Johnson, Nelson, Sellar, Smitherman, von Reichbauer.

 

      Senate Staff:Gene Baxstrom (786-7303)

                  April 3, 1987

 

 

           AS REPORTED BY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION, APRIL 1, 1987

 

BACKGROUND:

 

Local governments currently lack authority to comprehensively address the provision of road and highway facilities necessitated by economic development.  City and county powers are instead, provided in varying degrees to those units of government for various purposes.  No single district has the authority to address improvements on city streets, county roads and on state highways, nor has the power to utilize various funding sources such as property tax levies, local improvement tax assessments, and late-comer fees to fund those improvements.  Local governments are currently prohibited from imposing development fees to help pay the costs of public services, including transportation facilities necessitated development.

 

Many persons feel that a comprehensive approach, through a special purpose unit of government, would allow that area to best address and accommodate transportation needs associated with economic development.

 

This is one of five measures developed by the Task Force on Economic Development/Transportation Issues, established by the Legislative Transportation Committee in 1986, to address the transportation needs arising in areas of rapid economic growth.

 

SUMMARY:

 

Cities, towns and counties are authorized to establish transportation benefit districts to fund the capital improvement of city streets, county roads and state highways within the district.  The improvement(s) must meet the following criteria:  1) project consistent with transportation plans; 2) be necessitated by congestion levels attributable to economic development; 3) project must provide access to areas used for business purposes; and 4) be partially funded by local government or private contributions.

 

For counties, a benefit district may be created in all or in a portion of the unincorporated area and can include incorporated areas only with the approval of a city or town governing body.  A city district can include the area of another city, or unincorporated areas, with city or county approval.  Only that property which will benefit from a planned transportation improvement can be included within a transportation benefit district.

 

Creation of a transportation benefit district requires a public hearing and a county or city legislative body's determination that it is in the public interest to form the district.  The legislative authority is the governing body of a benefit district.  District electors are all registered voters residing in the district.  Dissolution is required when district obligations have been met.

 

The following sources of funding for benefit districts are provided:  (1) single year voter approved excess property tax levies; (2) multi-year, voter approved, excess property tax levies used to redeem general obligation (G.O.) bonds; (3) the issuance of G.O. bonds; (4) the formation of local improvement districts (LID's); (5) late-comer fees; (6) development fees related to transportation projects; (7) acceptance of gifts and donations; and (8) ability to apply for transportation benefit account funds.

 

No taxes can be imposed by a benefit district without voter approval. Assessments by a district are authorized.

 

Additional authority is included to allow exercising the powers of eminent domain.

 

 

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENT:

 

References to other related bills are updated.

 

Fiscal Note:      none requested

 

Senate Committee - Testified: Stan Finkelstein, Association of Washington Cities; John Doyle, Department of Transportation; Alex King, Redmond Chamber of Commerce; Steve Callendar, Snohomish County Committee for Improved Transportation