SENATE BILL REPORT

 

 

                                    SB 6266

 

 

BYSenators Metcalf, Vognild and Barr

 

 

Revising provisions for aquifer protection districts.

 

 

Senate Committee on Environment & Natural Resources

 

      Senate Hearing Date(s):January 14, 1988; February 5, 1988

 

Majority Report:  That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6266 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

      Signed by Senators Metcalf, Chairman; Smith, Vice Chairman; Barr, Benitz, Kreidler, Owen, Rinehart.

 

      Senate Staff:Gary Wilburn (786-7453)

                  February 5, 1988

 

 

AS REPORTED BY COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES, FEBRUARY 5, 1988

 

BACKGROUND:

 

In 1985 the Legislature authorized the creation of aquifer protection areas to finance the protection, preservation, and rehabilitation of subterranean water, and to reduce special assessments imposed upon households to finance facilities for such purposes.  County legislative authorities may create such areas upon approval by majority vote of the voters residing within the proposed area.  Aquifer protection areas may charge fees on the withdrawal of subterranean water and on on-site sewage disposal.  Fee revenues may be used to fund comprehensive plan preparation, construction of water quality facilities, and the reduction of special assessments imposed for construction of water quality facilities.

 

SUMMARY:

 

Aquifer protection areas may impose fees to fund the operation and maintenance of water quality facilities, in addition to the prior authority to impose fees for construction of such facilities.

 

 

EFFECT OF PROPOSED SUBSTITUTE:

 

Any aquifer protection area formed after the effective date of this 1988 act may operate and maintain facilities constructed by it.

 

Appropriation:    none

 

Revenue:    none

 

Fiscal Note:      none requested

 

Senate Committee - Testified: Gary Lowe, Association of Counties (for); Don Leaf, Thurston County Environmental Health (for); Representative Jean Silver (against); Bill Popo, City of Spokane (against)