SENATE BILL REPORT

 

 

                                   SSB 6435

 

 

BYSenate Committee on Economic Development & Labor (originally sponsored by Senators Lee and Owen)

 

 

Changing provisions relating to disclosure by contractors.

 

 

Senate Committee on Economic Development & Labor

 

      Senate Hearing Date(s):January 22, 1988; February 3, 1988

 

Majority Report:  That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6435 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

      Signed by Senators Lee, Chairman; Anderson, Vice Chairman; Cantu, Conner, Deccio, McMullen, Saling, Smitherman, Warnke, West, Williams.

 

      Senate Staff:Dave Cheal (786-7576)

                  March 2, 1988

 

 

House Committe on Commerce & Labor

 

 

                      AS PASSED SENATE, FEBRUARY 15, 1988

 

BACKGROUND:

 

Any contractor building improvements on real property totaling $1,000 or more is required to supply the customer with a disclosure statement designed to alert the customer to the hazards of construction lien claims. The penalty for failing to provide the disclosure is that the contractor may not bring or maintain any action in any court of the state for collection of amounts due under the contract.  An inadvertent omission of the disclosure to a sophisticated customer could result in the customer refusing to pay without any other justification.  Thus the penalty probably goes too far, and creates a trap for the unwary that was not intended.

 

SUMMARY:

 

The penalty is amended to provide that a contractor who fails to provide the required disclosure may not make a claim based on the lien laws, but is not precluded from bringing an ordinary collection action.

 

The $1,000 threshold is raised to $5,000.  The disclosure requirement is limited to residential construction.  An incorrect reference to Chapter 39.08 RCW is corrected to refer to Chapter 39.04 RCW, dealing with public works.

 

Appropriation:    none

 

Revenue:    none

 

Fiscal Note:      none requested

 

Senate Committee - Testified: Duke Schaub, AGC (for); Bohlke, WMACNA (for); Glenn H. Belisle, eastern Washington (for)

 

 

HOUSE AMENDMENT:

 

The threshold for application of the disclosure requirement is returned to $1,000 as in current law, rather than $5,000 as proposed by the Senate.  Small commercial contracts between $1,000 and $60,000 are brought within the scope of the bill, not just residential contracts.