SENATE BILL REPORT

 

 

                               SHB 783

 

 

BYHouse Committee on Agriculture & Rural Development (originally sponsored by Representatives Rasmussen, L. Smith, Rayburn, Baugher, Todd, McLean, Kremen, Doty, Holm, Peery, Jesernig and P. King) 

 

 

Allowing the Marketing Association of a cooperative to enter into discussions pertaining to milk agreements.

 

 

House Committe on Agriculture & Rural Development

 

 

Senate Committee on Agriculture

 

     Senate Hearing Date(s):March 27, 1987

 

Majority Report:     Do pass.

     Signed by Senators Hansen, Chairman; Bauer, Vice Chairman; Anderson, Bailey, Barr, Gaspard.

 

     Senate Staff:Tom McDonald (786-7404)

                March 27, 1987

 

 

       AS REPORTED BY COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, MARCH 27, 1987

 

BACKGROUND:

 

The Washington State Milk Pooling Act was enacted in 1971 to provide a means for milk producers to establish a market area pooling arrangement.  The Director of the Department of Agriculture is authorized to prescribe marketing areas, establish pooling agreements, and otherwise administer the Act.

 

Under the Act, milk dealers are defined as operators of a milk plant who collect milk from producers and disperse milk or milk products to establishments in the designated market area.  The Director can revoke or suspend a milk dealer's license if the dealer has been a party to fixing prices; however, collective marketing and sale of milk through a cooperative association organized under statutory authority is not to be considered a conspiracy in restraint of trade or an illegal monopoly.

 

Milk dealers, as well as other persons or entities, who assist in the marketing and sale of milk may be agents and not members of the cooperative association.  Although agencies of cooperative associations are recognized as a part of, or the same as, the association for the purposes of marketing and sales, the Milk Pooling Act does not state that agencies are protected like the cooperative associations from a presumption of acting in a conspiracy in restraint of trade.

 

SUMMARY:

 

A cooperative association making collective sales and marketing milk, directly or through a marketing agent, will not be deemed to be conspiring in restraint of trade or an illegal monopoly under the Milk Pooling Act.

 

Fiscal Note:    none requested

 

Senate Committee - Testified:   No one