HOUSE BILL REPORT
SSB 5328
BYSenate Committee on Economic Development & Labor (originally sponsored by Senators Bluechel, Lee, Smitherman and Warnke; by request of Director of Trade and Economic Development)
Revising provisions for the community economic revitalization board.
House Committe on Trade & Economic Development
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. (13)
Signed by Representatives Cantwell, Chair; Wineberry, Vice Chair; Doty, Ranking Republican Member; G. Fisher, Kirby, Kremen, Moyer, Raiter, Rasmussen, Rector, Schoon, Tate and Youngsman.
House Staff:Paul Leistner (786-7663)
AS REPORTED BY COMMITTEE ON TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
FEBRUARY 21, 1990
BACKGROUND:
The Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB) is authorized to make loans and grants to port districts, counties, cities, and towns to construct public facilities that support economic development efforts. Grants may be authorized only to the extent that a loan is not possible.
Before any loan or grant application is approved, the local unit of government must demonstrate to CERB that no other timely source of funding is available to it at costs that are reasonably similar to CERB financing.
The Community Economic Revitalization Board prioritizes each proposed project according to the number of jobs it would create after it is completed and the unemployment rate in the area in that the jobs are located. At least 20 percent of the funds available for grants and loans must be for projects in distressed counties, unless it appears that the number of applications for projects in these areas is insufficient to use the 20 percent allocation.
The Community Economic Revitalization Board is authorized to make grants and loans only for projects that result in specific private developments or expansions in: (1) manufacturing, production, food processing, assembly, warehousing, and industrial distribution; (2) processing or support of processing of recyclable materials; (3) manufacturing facilities that rely significantly on recyclable materials; or (4) projects that substantially support the export of goods and services outside the state.
SUMMARY:
BILL AS AMENDED: The Community Economic Revitalization Board is authorized to make grants or loans that would result in specific private developments or expansions in destination tourist resorts.
A destination tourism resort is defined as a planned tourism and recreation complex that is developed primarily as a location for recreation and tourism activities that will be used primarily by non-residents of the state and that is generally located away from densely populated areas.
AMENDED BILL COMPARED TO SUBSTITUTE: The amended bill adds the requirement that the creation of employment for Washington State residents be a primary objective of any destination tourist resort projects that receives CERB funding.
Fiscal Note: Not Requested.
House Committee ‑ Testified For: Senator Eleanor Lee, Chair, Senate Committee on Economic Development and Labor; Senator Alan Bluechel, Chair, Washington 2000; and Dave Rogers, Washington Public Ports Association.
House Committee - Testified Against: No one.
House Committee - Testimony For: There are many sites in Washington State that could be developed as tourist resorts and many of these projects would qualify for CERB funding if the bill passes.
House Committee - Testimony Against: None.