HOUSE BILL REPORT
SB 6328
BYSenators McCaslin and Sutherland
Changing requirements for state agency use of credit reporting agencies.
House Committe on State Government
Majority Report: Do pass. (8)
Signed by Representatives Todd, Chair; Anderson, Vice Chair; McLean, Ranking Republican Member; R. Fisher, Hankins, R. King, Morris and O'Brien.
House Staff:Barbara McLain (786-7135)
AS REPORTED BY COMMITTEE ON STATE GOVERNMENT
FEBRUARY 22, 1990
BACKGROUND:
Credit reporting agencies (or credit bureaus) collect credit information and sell it to banks, charge card companies, and other creditors in the form of an individual's credit history. There is no fee to firms providing the credit information. Credit reporting agencies are regulated by the Fair Credit Reporting Act, administered by the Federal Trade Commission.
In 1989, the Legislature passed a law allowing state agencies to report past due accounts receivable to credit reporting agencies whenever the agency determines that reporting would be cost- effective and would not violate confidentiality. Federal regulations also require institutions of higher education to provide information to credit reporting agencies on past-due federally insured student loans.
Industry practice with regard to reporting credit information is to report all accounts receivable, not just those that are past due. In this way, potential creditors have information about an individual's overall level of debt before making a decision to increase that debt with loans or lines of credit.
SUMMARY:
State agencies may report any receivables, rather than only past-due accounts receivable, to credit reporting agencies whenever the agency determines that reporting would be cost-effective and would not violate confidentiality or other legal requirements.
Fiscal Note: Available.
House Committee ‑ Testified For: Bob Jacobs, Office of Financial Management.
House Committee - Testified Against: No one.
House Committee - Testimony For: The bill gives the state the ability to do what private industry can do with regard to reporting debt information. It benefits state agencies, consumers trying to obtain appropriate levels of credit, and debtors who need to know how much credit to extend to a consumer.
House Committee - Testimony Against: None.