SENATE BILL REPORT

 

 

                                    SB 5014

 

 

BYSenators Pullen, Madsen, Hayner and Rasmussen

 

 

Amending provisions regarding police dogs.

 

 

Senate Committee on Law & Justice

 

      Senate Hearing Date(s):January 10, 1989; January 12, 1989

 

Majority Report:  That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5014 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

      Signed by Senators Pullen, Chairman; Hayner, Nelson, Newhouse, Niemi, Rinehart, Talmadge, Thorsness.

 

      Senate Staff:Jon Carlson (786-7459)

                  February 10, 1989

 

 

          AS REPORTED BY COMMITTEE ON LAW & JUSTICE, JANUARY 12, 1989

 

BACKGROUND:

 

A "dog handler" is a law enforcement officer who has successfully completed training in police dog handling through the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission.  Current law provides civil immunity for a dog handler using a police dog in the line of duty in accordance with standards established by the law enforcement agency for which the dog handler works.  However, there is no provision which affords the dog handler immunity from criminal liability.

 

Harming a police dog is a Class C felony under present law.  The statute does not address the situation where a person injures or kills a police dog not actually involved in police work at the time of the injury.

 

SUMMARY:

 

A dog handler who uses a police dog in the line of duty in accordance with standards established by the law enforcement agency for which he or she works is immune from criminal liability.

 

A person is guilty of harming a police dog if the person maliciously injures or kills any dog that the person knows or has reason to know is a police dog whether or not the dog is actually engaged in police work at the time of injury or death.

 

It is clarified that police dogs are exempted from the registration procedures under the state's dangerous dog statute.

 

 

EFFECT OF PROPOSED SUBSTITUTE:

 

The language protecting dog handlers from criminal liability is deleted.

 

Appropriation:    none

 

Revenue:    none

 

Fiscal Note:      none requested

 

Senate Committee - Testified: John McCroskey, Lewis County Sheriff's Department (pro); John McDonald, Pierce County Sheriff's Department (pro)