SENATE BILL REPORT

 

 

                                   SSB 5435

 

 

BYSenate Committee on Governmental Operations (originally sponsored by Senators McCaslin, DeJarnatt, Nelson, Owen, Smitherman, Anderson, Bender and Sutherland)

 

 

Regulating subdivisions.

 

 

Senate Committee on Governmental Operations

 

      Senate Hearing Date(s):February 7, 1989; February 20, 1989

 

Majority Report:  That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5435 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

      Signed by Senators McCaslin, Chairman; Pullen, Sutherland.

 

      Senate Staff:Sam Thompson (786-7754); Eugene Green (786-7405)

                  March 15, 1989

 

 

                       AS PASSED SENATE, MARCH 14, 1989

 

BACKGROUND:

 

Cities and counties are required to follow procedures specified in platting and subdivision laws when they review and approve (or disapprove) proposed divisions of property.

 

Proposed subdivisions must be approved, disapproved, or returned for modification within 90 days of the submission of a completed application.  Cities and counties have been criticized for delays in the approval or disapproval of subdivisions based upon uncertain standards to be applied in determining whether a submitted application is complete.

 

Subdivision applications include a preliminary plat--a drawing of a proposed subdivision showing streets, lots, blocks and other elements of the subdivision.  The final plat is the plan of the subdivision that is filed with the county auditor after approval of the subdivision.

 

SUMMARY:

 

A completed application is defined to consist of drawings and documents required under city or county ordinances adopted pursuant to platting and subdivision laws.  Within ten days of the submittal of a preliminary plat, a city or county must notify an applicant in writing that their application is incomplete or the preliminary plat will be considered a completed application.

 

The process for the approval or disapproval of a proposed subdivision--including final action by the city or county legislative authority--is extended from 90 days to 150 days of the acceptance of a completed application.  Within 90 days of acceptance, the city or county must notify the applicant of any specific deficiencies of the preliminary plat, and measures necessary to correct the deficiencies.  The 150 day period is tolled for the time that the applicant utilizes to correct the deficiencies, and for five days after the return of the application for the review of any corrections.

 

A planning commission, hearing examiner or other agency that holds a hearing to develop a recommendation concerning the proposed subdivision must hold the hearing within 120 days of the submittal of a completed application.  The period for the submittal of the recommendation to the city or county legislative authority is extended from 14 days to 30 days following the completion of the hearing.  If any review and recommendation is not completed within the applicable time periods, the preliminary plat is to be forwarded to the next stage of the approval process with a presumed recommendation of approval.

 

A city or county legislative body must review a proposed subdivision within 45 days of its submittal to the body for final approval.  The final plat must be filed with the county auditor within five days after final approval of the subdivision or returned to the applicant for filing.

 

A city or county may require submittal of construction plans following preliminary plat approval, but prior to final plat approval.  Review of such plans must be completed within 45 days of submittal by the applicant.  If deficiencies are discovered, the applicant must be notified of necessary corrections within 20 days of submittal.

 

Local administrative policies interpreting subdivision laws and ordinances must be formally adopted and available.

 

Appropriation:    none

 

Revenue:    none

 

Fiscal Note:      none requested

 

Senate Committee - Testified: Jim Williams, Mike Echelbarger, Chuck Henderson, Seattle Master Builders (pro); Don Pratt, City of Bremerton, Don Krupp, City of Olympia, Mike Shuttlewort, City of Steilacoom (con); Burt Talcott, Washington Association of Realtors (pro); Ron Main, King County, Gary Lowe, Washington State Association of Counties (con)