SENATE BILL REPORT

 

 

                                    SB 6447

 

 

BYSenators Benitz, Madsen, Patrick, Sutherland and Barr

 

 

Regarding failing public water systems.

 

 

Senate Committee on Energy & Utilities

 

      Senate Hearing Date(s):January 19, 1990; January 23, 1990

 

Majority Report:  That Substitute Senate Bill No. 6447 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

      Signed by Senators Benitz, Chairman; Metcalf, Nelson, Owen, Patrick, Stratton, Sutherland, Williams.

 

      Senate Staff:David Monthie (786-7198)

                  January 24, 1990

 

 

Senate Committee on Ways & Means

 

      Senate Hearing Date(s):January 31, 1990

 

      Senate Staff:Bill Freund (786-7715)

                  January 29, 1990

 

 

       AS REPORTED BY COMMITTEE ON ENERGY & UTILITIES, JANUARY 23, 1990

 

BACKGROUND:

 

There are over 12,000 public water systems in Washington, an increase of more than 100 percent from the number ten years ago.  Approximately 80 percent of these are small systems with fewer than 100 connections.  Virtually all of these are investor-owned, cooperatives, mutual companies, or homeowner association-operated.

 

These small systems have been failing with increasing frequency to comply with the legal requirement to deliver water of adequate quantity and quality.  It is well accepted by professionals in the drinking water field that small systems commonly have problems with design, financing, operation, and management.  Often these problems are directly related to the limited capital available from the small rate base, and because privately-operated systems do not have access to funding sources that publicly-operated systems have.

 

The burden on such small systems will be increasing in the future as they are ordered to comply with costly new testing and treatment requirements under federal law.  On many occasions in the past, owners or operators of such systems have refused to meet their legal obligations, or have abandoned the systems entirely, which has created a potential threat to the health of their customers.  Solutions to this problem, which range from stricter enforcement to takeovers of failing systems by well-operated systems, are complicated by legal ambiguities or barriers.

 

SUMMARY:

 

The authority to file legal actions against non-complying systems is made explicit and strengthened.  The Secretary of Health or local health officer is given express authority to bring legal actions and obtain temporary injunctive orders if there is an immediate and serious danger to residents constituting an emergency.  In receivership actions brought by the department, it must recommend to the court an available and willing person to act as a receiver from a list the department maintains.  In the absence of such a person, the county or county health officer is to be named as receiver.  The department is to recommend to the court that receivers act in the best interests of customers.  A receiver may be appointed ex parte on a showing of an immediate and serious danger constituting an emergency.  Court-established bond for a receiver is to be minimal.  The department may initiate an action for a receivership at the request of a local health officer.

 

An exemption from sales tax, a revision to condemnation statutes, an allowance for different rates that reflect the cost of acquisition and improvement of a system, and access to public works trust fund monies are provided to assist local governments to purchase and improve water systems that are failing to meet health and safety standards.

 

Administrative fines for violations of health and safety standards must be at least $500.  Local health officers are authorized to impose administrative penalties for violations of state regulations, and to file legal actions.

 

The Department of Health, in conjunction with other agencies and interested parties, must provide a comprehensive report to the Legislature by December 1, 1990, on the problems with existing public water systems and the potential for more problems in the future, with alternative approaches or solutions.

 

 

EFFECT OF PROPOSED SUBSTITUTE:

 

Municipal entities, special purpose districts, and investor-owned water companies are added to the list of qualified receivers maintained by the Department of Health.  Persons appointed to act as receivers are not personally liable for good faith reasonable actions.  Provisions regarding utilization of public works trust account money are modified to delete language regarding operation and maintenance costs and technical assistance.  The Department of Health is not permitted to mitigate administrative penalties below $500 minimum.  Local health officers are authorized to inspect as necessary water system construction.  The Department of Health is to consult the UTC and local health officials in preparing its report.

 

Appropriation:    none

 

Revenue:    none

 

Fiscal Note:      requested January 12, 1990

 

Effective Date:The bill contains an emergency clause and takes effect immediately.

 

Senate Committee - Testified: ENERGY & UTILITIES:  Pete Butkus, Public Works Board (pro);  John Kirner, Washington Water Utilities Council (pro); Stanford Olsen, Investor-Owned Water Utilities Association (pro); Eric Slagle and Bill Lichty, DOH (pro)