HJ60

NOTICE: Formatting and page numbering in this document may be different

from that in the original published version.

SIXTIETH DAY

__________

MORNING SESSION

__________

House Chamber, Olympia, Thursday, March 11, 1993

The House was called to order at 9:45 a.m. by the Speaker (Representative Holm presiding). The Clerk called the roll and a quorum was present.

The Speaker assumed the chair.

The flag was escorted to the rostrum by a Sergeant at Arms Color Guard, Pages Windy Gill and Collette Jacques. Prayer was offered by Reverend Kosho Yukawa of the Tacoma Buddhist Temple.

Poetry was offered by Judith Roach:

HOT BONES

This is for my son, Robin,

whose chromosomes count too many

and whose ears are stopped

by the word profound,

who speaks with his hands,

even in the delirium of a high fever,

and who has images of hot bones

in his poems, which he performs

in the flourish of a fervid dance,

accompanied by a tambourine he doesn't hear,

the swirling from inside

his own strong internal rhythm,

his eyes seeing a poetry of agile hands

connected to body, to honest work

-stacking wood or sorting scrap metal-

which is his passion,

tied, as it is, to trust

in the rightness of giving oneself

wholly, to the task at hand.

THE FLOWERS

When you ask them

what they do for a living

they do not mention photosynthesis

but unfurl their slender petals

spread them a little wider

like a slow dance move

throb a sweet surge

of deep scent

unsound the shadow

of a sob

Reading of the Journal of the previous day was dispensed with and it was ordered to stand approved.

MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

March 10, 1993

Mr. Speaker:

The Senate has passed:

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5230,

SENATE BILL NO. 5352,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5407,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5432,

SENATE BILL NO. 5584,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5837,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5937,

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Brad Hendrickson, Deputy Secretary

There being no objection, the House advanced to the fourth order of business.

INTRODUCTIONS AND FIRST READING

HB 2102 by Representatives Chappell and Jones

AN ACT Relating to the motorcycle safety education account; and amending RCW 46.68.065.

Referred to Committee on Transportation.

HB 2103 by Representative Chappell

AN ACT Relating to arrests by enforcement officers of the Washington state liquor control board; and amending RCW 10.88.330.

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

HB 2104 by Representatives Wineberry, Locke, Jacobsen and Anderson

AN ACT Relating to funding for the Seattle Vocational Institute; creating a new section; and making an appropriation.

Referred to Committee on Capital Budget.

HB 2105 by Representatives Wineberry, Dorn and Brumsickle

AN ACT Relating to creating the successful tutoring of at-risk students program; adding new sections to chapter 28A.630 RCW; creating a new section; and making an appropriation.

Referred to Committee on Education.

SSB 5025 by Senate Committee on Natural Resources (originally sponsored by Senator Owen)

Clarifying forest fire fighting duties.

Referred to Committee on Natural Resources & Parks.

ESSB 5054 by Senate Committee on Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators A. Smith, Winsley and Erwin)

Requiring the sellers of sports memorabilia to authenticate the merchandise.

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

SSB 5066 by Senate Committee on Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators A. Smith, McCaslin and Nelson)

Limiting powers of trustees.

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

ESSB 5110 by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Haugen, Drew and Winsley)

Changing provisions relating to sewer and water districts.

Referred to Committee on Local Government.

SSB 5135 by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Talmadge and McCaslin)

Establishing requirements for ballot titles for referenda.

Referred to Committee on State Government.

ESSB 5162 by Senate Committee on Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Niemi, A. Smith, Prentice, McAuliffe, Drew, Spanel, Skratek, Loveland, Talmadge, Moore, Wojahn, Snyder, Fraser, Rinehart, Vognild, Williams, Bluechel, Bauer, Sheldon, Newhouse, Sutherland, Prince, Pelz, Jesernig and Gaspard)

Prohibiting interference with access to or from a health care facility.

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

SSB 5195 by Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce (originally sponsored by Senator Moore)

Regulating excessive securities transactions.

Referred to Committee on Financial Institutions & Insurance.

SSB 5219 by Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators M. Rasmussen, Newhouse and Barr)

Modifying provisions regarding the Washington wine commission.

Referred to Committee on Revenue.

ESSB 5230 by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Hargrove, Anderson, Roach, Snyder, M. Rasmussen, Haugen, Jesernig, Deccio and Oke)

Clarifying and extending dates established under the growth management act.

Referred to Committee on Local Government.

SB 5248 by Senators M. Rasmussen, Barr, Loveland, Newhouse and Bauer

Excluding pollination agents from "sale at retail" and "retail sale" definition for business and occupation tax.

Referred to Committee on Revenue.

SSB 5255 by Senate Committee on Ecology & Parks (originally sponsored by Senators Fraser, Barr, Talmadge, Bluechel and Haugen)

Providing for evaluation and transfer to the parks and recreation commission of land acquired by the state by escheat.

Referred to Committee on Natural Resources & Parks.

SSB 5256 by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Sutherland, McCaslin and Erwin)

Restricting the use of city or town facilities to advocate for or against an annexation.

Referred to Committee on Local Government.

SB 5265 by Senators Snyder, Winsley, A. Smith, Bauer, Hochstatter, Gaspard, L. Smith, Loveland, Vognild, Skratek and Pelz

Modifying funeral expenses of a deceased person.

Referred to Committee on Appropriations.

ESSB 5285 by Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce (originally sponsored by Senators Gaspard, Moore and von Reichbauer)

Expanding the state investment board.

Referred to Committee on State Government.

SB 5287 by Senators Barr, M. Rasmussen, Hochstatter, Loveland, Snyder, Newhouse, Bauer, Deccio, Jesernig, Owen, Sutherland, Oke, Amondson, Moore, Fraser, Anderson, Prince, Sellar, Winsley and Erwin

Prescribing additional penalties for failure to make restitution for theft of livestock.

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

SB 5352 by Senators Newhouse, Spanel, Moore, Bauer and Winsley; by request of Joint Committee on Pension Policy

Specifying how payments based on retirement agreements shall affect calculation of pension benefits.

Referred to Committee on Appropriations.

ESB 5362 by Senators A. Smith, Niemi, Pelz, Spanel and Quigley

Requiring full disclosure of civil court proceedings relating to public hazards.

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

SB 5381 by Senators Vognild, Newhouse, Deccio, Hochstatter, Sellar and Erwin

Extending periods for overheight load permits.

Referred to Committee on Transportation.

SSB 5407 by Senate Committee on Ecology & Parks (originally sponsored by Senators Loveland, Barr and M. Rasmussen)

Regarding county administration of agricultural burning permits.

Referred to Committee on Environmental Affairs.

SSB 5430 by Senate Committee on Trade, Technology & Economic Development (originally sponsored by Senators Fraser, Bluechel, Pelz, Prentice, Moore, Prince, Moyer, Skratek and Deccio)

Commemorating the thirtieth anniversary of Washington's sister-state relationship with Hyogo prefecture.

Referred to Committee on State Government.

SSB 5432 by Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce (originally sponsored by Senators Pelz, Prentice, Moore, Franklin, Bauer, Wojahn, Fraser and Skratek)

Studying discrimination based on race and national origin in home mortgage lending.

Referred to Committee on Financial Institutions & Insurance.

SB 5447 by Senator Fraser; by request of Utilities & Transportation Commission

Modifying review of solid waste collection company tariff filings.

Referred to Committee on Environmental Affairs.

SB 5523 by Senators Barr, Snyder and Prince

Expanding authority for appointment of district court judges pro tem.

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

SB 5526 by Senators Barr, Bauer, Prince and Sutherland

Providing for the Columbia river resource task force.

Referred to Committee on Energy & Utilities.

SB 5541 by Senators Fraser, A. Smith, Sellar, McAuliffe, Quigley and Winsley

Revising the statute of limitations for certain sex offenses.

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

SSB 5567 by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Barr, Owen and Erwin)

Allowing benefits for emergency medical service district volunteers.

Referred to Committee on Local Government.

SB 5584 by Senators Franklin, Winsley, McAuliffe, Skratek, M. Rasmussen, Hargrove, Wojahn, Niemi, Drew and Pelz

Creating the Washington housing policy act.

Referred to Committee on Trade, Economic Development & Housing.

SSB 5612 by Senate Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Senators Erwin, Skratek, Prentice, von Reichbauer, M. Rasmussen, Nelson, Sellar, Vognild, Winsley, Hochstatter, Barr and Oke)

Reorganizing the transportation improvement board.

Referred to Committee on Transportation.

SB 5645 by Senators Spanel and Fraser

Restricting property divisions.

Referred to Committee on Local Government.

SSB 5698 by Senate Committee on Trade, Technology & Economic Development (originally sponsored by Senators Bluechel, Skratek, Sheldon, Williams and Erwin)

Assisting companies to adopt ISO-9000 quality standards.

Referred to Committee on Trade, Economic Development & Housing.

SB 5759 by Senators McAuliffe, Prentice, Skratek, Loveland, von Reichbauer, Haugen, Prince, McDonald, Drew, Owen, Moyer, Erwin, Winsley, Anderson and M. Rasmussen

Extending the involuntary treatment act to cover the commitment of chemically dependent adults.

Referred to Committee on Human Services.

SB 5799 by Senators Nelson and Sutherland

Providing address designations on subdivision approvals for improved utility placements.

Referred to Committee on Local Government.

SSB 5837 by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Quigley, Moore, Pelz, A. Smith, Prentice, Bauer, Hargrove, Sheldon, Erwin, Niemi, Jesernig and Talmadge)

Financing state and local government.

Referred to Committee on Local Government.

SSB 5839 by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Cantu, Drew, Haugen and Winsley)

Providing consolidated mail service for state agencies.

Referred to Committee on State Government.

ESSB 5844 by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators McAuliffe, Erwin, M. Rasmussen, Amondson, Drew, Prentice, Pelz, Niemi, Winsley, Sheldon, McDonald, Talmadge, Owen, Snyder, Haugen, Hargrove, Moyer, Quigley, Roach, Jesernig, Oke, Hochstatter and Spanel)

Allowing volunteers to assist agencies to serve at-risk children's needs.

Referred to Committee on Human Services.

SSB 5937 by Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Quigley, Snyder, Gaspard, von Reichbauer, Vognild, A. Smith, Rinehart, McAuliffe, Drew, Hargrove, Sheldon, Loveland, Haugen, Erwin, Sutherland, Jesernig, Skratek, Spanel, Niemi, Roach, Hochstatter and Deccio)

Including certain indebtedness in the calculation of the seven percent debt limitation.

Referred to Committee on Capital Budget.

SJM 8017 by Senators Jesernig and Loveland

Requesting the United States Department of Energy to support the Fast Flux Test Facility at Hanford.

Referred to Committee on Energy & Utilities.

SJM 8021 by Senators Williams, McCaslin, Fraser, Talmadge, M. Rasmussen, Moore, Deccio, Sutherland, Barr and Franklin

Requesting federal assistance with implementing the safe drinking water act.

Referred to Committee on Environmental Affairs.

On motion of Representative Peery, the bills and memorials listed on today's introduction sheet under the fourth order of business were referred to the committees so designated.

There being no objection, the House advanced to the sixth order of business.

SECOND READING

MOTION

Representative Peery moved that the House consider the following bills in the following order: House Bill No. 1221 and House Bill No. 1673. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1221, by Representatives G. Cole, Ballard, Flemming, Jacobsen, Veloria, Cothern, Dellwo, Thibaudeau, Appelwick, Johanson, Orr, Scott, Ballasiotes, Silver, Lisk, Leonard, Cooke, J. Kohl, L. Johnson, Mielke and Kremen

Centralizing poison information services.

The bill was read the second time. Committee on Health Care recommendation: Majority, do pass as amended. Committee on Appropriations recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute. (For committee recommendation see Journal, 52nd Day, March 3, 1993.)

Representative Dellwo moved adoption of the committee amendment and spoke in favor of adoption of the committee amendment and it was adopted.

On motion of Representative Valle, Substitute House Bill No. 1221 was substituted for House Bill No. 1221 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1221 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives G. Cole, Morton and Dyer spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

On motion of Representative J. Kohl, Representative Springer was excused.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1221.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage on Substitute House Bill No. 1221 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 95, Nays - 0, Absent - 2, Excused - 1.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 95.

Absent: Representatives Appelwick and Wineberry - 2.

Excused: Representative Springer - 1.

Substitute House Bill No. 1221, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1673, by Representatives Roland, Eide, Vance, Brough, Campbell, Wang, Jacobsen, Patterson and Forner

Creating the aerospace industry legislative task force.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Shin, Substitute House Bill No. 1673 was substituted for House Bill No. 1673 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1673 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Roland and Forner spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1673.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1673 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 1, Excused - 1.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 96.

Absent: Representative Wineberry - 1.

Excused: Representative Springer - 1.

Substitute House Bill No. 1673, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved the House now consider House Bill No. 1521 on the Suspension Calendar. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1521, by Representative Valle; by request of Office of Financial Management

Funding the state auditor municipal corporation division.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Locke moved that the committee recommendation be adopted and the bill be advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representatives Valle and Silver spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1521.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1521 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 1, Excused - 1.

Absent: Representative Wineberry - 1.

Excused: Representative Springer - 1

House Bill No. 1521, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1530, by Representatives Morris, Foreman, Springer, Ogden, Carlson, Riley, Silver, Leonard, Chappell, H. Myers, Rayburn, Mastin, Thibaudeau, Anderson, Holm, Campbell, Brough, King, Hansen, Jones, Basich, Quall, Conway, Van Luven, Cothern, Long and Finkbeiner

Providing for continuation of property tax exemptions for senior citizens confined in hospitals and nursing homes.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative G. Fisher moved that the committee recommendation be adopted and the bill be advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representatives Morris and Foreman spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1530.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1530 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 1, Excused - 1.

Absent: Representative Wineberry - 1.

Excused: Representative Springer - 1.

House Bill No. 1530, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passe

HOUSE BILL NO. 1544, by Representatives Appelwick and Johanson

Requiring that criminal penalties set by cities and counties be the same as those set in state law.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Ludwig moved that the committee recommendation be adopted and the substitute bill be advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representatives Appelwick and Padden spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1544.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage on Substitute House Bill No. 1544 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 1, Excused - 1.

Absent: Representative Wineberry - 1.

Excused: Representative Springer - 1.

Substitute House Bill No. 1544, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1566, by Representative H. Myers

Changing who gives notice of estate tax findings filings.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Ludwig moved that the committee recommendation be adopted and the substitute bill be advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representative H. Myers spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

On motion of Representative J. Kohl, Representative Wineberry was excused.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1566.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1566 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

Excused: Representatives Springer and Wineberry - 2.

Substitute House Bill No. 1566, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1578, by Representatives L. Johnson, Morris, G. Cole, Padden, Riley, Edmondson, Mastin, Johanson, Jones, Basich, King, Valle, Campbell, Long, Shin, Springer, Karahalios, Roland, Rayburn, Conway, Kremen, Ogden, Cothern and H. Myers; by request of Department of Corrections

Revising provisions relating to offenders under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Mastin moved that the committee recommendation be adopted and the substitute bill be advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representatives L. Johnson and Long spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1578.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1578 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

Excused: Representatives Springer and Wineberry - 2.

Substitute House Bill No. 1578, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1602, by Representatives Chappell, Cothern and Thomas; by request of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Changing election provisions for regional committee members.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Cothern moved that the committee recommendation be adopted and the substitute bill be advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representatives Chappell and Brough spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1602.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1602 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

Excused: Representatives Springer and Wineberry - 2.

Substitute House Bill No. 1602, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

The Speaker declared the House to be at ease.

AFTERNOON SESSION

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) called the House to order at 1:00 p.m.

The Clerk called the roll and a quorum was present.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved that the House immediately consider the following bills in the following order and then proceed with the remaining bills on the second reading calendar: House Bill No. 1808, House Bill No. 1812, House Bill No. 1914, House Bill No. 1931 and House Bill No. 1756. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1808, by Representatives Shin, Mastin, Forner, Wineberry, Rayburn, Jones, Cothern, J. Kohl, Wang, Van Luven, Chandler and Linville

Creating the Washington council on international trade.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Shin, Substitute House Bill No. 1808 was substituted for House Bill No. 1808 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1808 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Shin and Forner spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

On motion of Representative J. Kohl, Representatives Springer and Locke were excused.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1808.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1808 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 92, Nays - 0, Absent - 4, Excused - 2.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 92.

Absent: Representatives Basich, Conway, Johnson, R. and Lemmon - 4.

Excused: Representatives Locke and Springer - 2.

Substitute House Bill No. 1808, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1812, by Representatives Jones, Dorn, R. Meyers, Schmidt, Pruitt, Kessler, Karahalios and Carlson

Changing teacher evaluations for teachers with at least four years of satisfactory evaluations.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Jones, Carlson and Dorn spoke in favor of passage of the bill and Representative Thomas spoke against it.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1812.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1812 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 93, Nays - 2, Absent - 1, Excused - 2.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 93.

Voting nay: Representatives Dyer and Thomas - 2.

Absent: Representative Basich - 1.

Excused: Representatives Locke and Springer - 2.

House Bill No. 1812, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1914, by Representatives Brown, Long, Johanson, L. Johnson, Edmondson, Cothern, Scott, Wood, Leonard, Brough, Kremen, Dyer, Brumsickle, Jones, King, Carlson, Karahalios, Schoesler, Hansen, Lemmon, Springer, Rayburn, Patterson, J. Kohl and Cooke

Allowing volunteers to assist agencies to serve at-risk children's needs.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Leonard, Substitute House Bill No. 1914 was substituted for House Bill No. 1914 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1914 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Brown and Cooke spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1914.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1914 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 1, Excused - 1.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 96.

Absent: Representative Basich - 1.

Excused: Representative Springer - 1.

Substitute House Bill No. 1914, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1931, by Representatives Schmidt, Zellinsky and Wood

Regulating steamboat operators.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative R. Fisher, Substitute House Bill No. 1931 was substituted for House Bill No. 1931 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1931 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Schmidt spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1931.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1931 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 1, Excused - 1.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 96.

Absent: Representative Basich - 1.

Excused: Representative Springer - 1.

Substitute House Bill No. 1931, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1756, by Representatives Veloria, Brumsickle and Casada

Requiring the use of licensed or certified electricians for certain purposes.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Veloria moved adoption of the following amendment by Representatives Veloria and Heavey:

Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

"Sec. I. RCW 19.28.610 and 1992 c 240 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

Nothing in RCW 19.28.510 through 19.28.620 shall be construed to require that a person obtain a license or a certified electrician in order to do electrical work at his or her residence or farm or place of business or on other property owned by him or her, unless the electrical work is on the construction of a new building intended for rent, sale, or lease: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That nothing in RCW 19.28.510 through 19.28.620 shall be intended to derogate from or dispense with the requirements of any valid electrical code enacted by a city or town pursuant to RCW 19.28.010(((2)))(3), except that no code shall require the holder of a certificate of competency to demonstrate any additional proof of competency or obtain any other license or pay any fee in order to engage in the electrical construction trade: AND PROVIDED FURTHER, That RCW 19.28.510 through 19.28.620 shall not apply to common carriers subject to Part I of the Interstate Commerce Act, nor to their officers and employees: AND PROVIDED FURTHER, That nothing in RCW 19.28.510 through 19.28.620 shall be deemed to apply to the installation or maintenance of telephone, telegraph, radio, or television wires and equipment; nor to any electrical utility or its employees in the installation, repair, and maintenance of electrical wiring, circuits, and equipment by or for the utility, or comprising a part of its plants, lines or systems. The licensing provisions of RCW 19.28.510 through 19.28.620 shall not apply to:

(1) Persons making electrical installations on their own property((;

(2))) or to regularly employed employees working on the premises of their employer, unless the electrical work is on the construction of a new building intended for rent, sale, or lease; or

(((3))) (2) Employees of an employer while the employer is performing utility type work of the nature described in RCW 19.28.200 so long as such employees have registered in the state of Washington with or graduated from a state-approved outside lineman apprenticeship course that is recognized by the department and that qualifies a person to perform such work: AND PROVIDED FURTHER, That nothing in RCW 19.28.510 through 19.28.620 shall be construed to restrict the right of any householder to assist or receive assistance from a friend, neighbor, relative or other person when none of the individuals doing the electrical installation hold themselves out as engaged in the trade or business of electrical installations. Nothing precludes any person who is exempt from the licensing requirements of this chapter under this section from obtaining a journeyman or specialty certificate of competency if they otherwise meet the requirements of this chapter."

Representatives Veloria and Horn spoke in favor of the amendment and it was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Veloria spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed House Bill No. 1756.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed House Bill No. 1756 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 97, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 1.

Excused: Representative Springer - 1.

Engrossed House Bill No. 1756, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved that the House immediately consider House Bill No. 1688.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1688, by Representatives Campbell, Forner, Roland, Tate, Mastin, Conway, Shin and Sheldon

Installing manufactured homes.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Wineberry, Substitute House Bill No. 1688 was substituted for House Bill No. 1688 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1688 was read the second time.

MOTION

On motion of Representative Peery, the House deferred further consideration of Substitute House Bill No. 1688 and the bill held its place on the second reading calendar.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1085, by Representatives R. Fisher, Jacobsen, Pruitt, Romero, J. Kohl, Leonard, Basich, Shin, Wood, Dunshee, R. Meyers, Brough, Kessler, Johanson and Wolfe

Authorizing community and technical colleges to develop and fund transportation demand management programs.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative R. Fisher, Substitute House Bill No. 1085 was substituted for House Bill No. 1085 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1085 was read the second time.

Representative R. Fisher moved the following amendment by Representatives Jacobsen and R. Fisher:

On page 2, line 29, after "charged" strike "students registering" and insert "to employees and students"

On page 3, beginning on line 1, after "Sec. 3." strike everything through "fees." on line 7 and insert "The governing board of an institution of higher education as defined in RCW 28B.10.016 may impose either a voluntary or a mandatory transportation fee on employees and on students at the institution. The transportation fee shall be used solely to fund transportation demand management programs that reduce the demand for campus and neighborhood parking, and promote alternatives to single-occupant vehicle driving. If the board charges a mandatory transportation fee to students, it shall charge a mandatory transportation fee to employees. The transportation fee for employees may exceed, but shall not be lower than the transportation fee charged to students. The transportation fee for employees may be deducted from the employees' paychecks. The transportation fee for students may be imposed annually, or each academic term. For students, the transportation fee shall not exceed ten percent of the tuition and services and activities fees rate for resident undergraduate students. The board may make a limited number of exceptions to the fee based on a policy adopted by the board."

Representative R. Fisher spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and it was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative R. Fisher spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1085.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1085 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 1, Absent - 0, Excused - 1.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 96.

Voting nay: Representative Morris - 1.

Excused: Representative Springer - 1.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1085, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

On motion of Representative Peery, the House deferred consideration of House Bill No. 1146 and the bill held its place on the second reading calendar.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1177, by Representatives Jacobsen, R. Fisher, Dunshee, King, Johanson, R. Meyers, J. Kohl, Springer and Orr

Requiring an evaluation of the potential for wildlife enhancement projects on state rights of way.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Fuhrman moved adoption of the following amendment by Representative Fuhrman:

On page 1, at the beginning of line 6, strike "wildlife" and

insert "raptor"

On page 1, line 6 after "managed for" strike "wildlife" and insert "raptor"

On page 1 at the beginning of line 12, strike "wildlife" and insert "raptor"

On page 1, beginning on line 12, after "rights of way" strike ", with particular emphasis on raptor habitat enhancement"

Representative Fuhrman spoke in favor of the amendment and Representative R. Fisher spoke against it. The amendment was not adopted.

Representative Fuhrman moved adoption of the following amendment by Representative Fuhrman:

On page 1, line 10 after "potential of" insert "select"

On page 1, line 12 after "projects on" insert "select"

On page 1 after line 16, insert:

"For purposes of this section, 'select state rights of way' shall mean a corridor owned and managed by the department of transportation and designated as a state highway under chapter 47.17 RCW."

Representative Fuhrman spoke in favor of the amendment and Representative R. Fisher spoke against it.

The Speaker called on the House to divide. The result of the division was 38 YEAS; 59 NAYS. The amendment was lost.

Representative Fuhrman moved adoption of the following amendment by Representative Fuhrman:

On page 1, line 11, after "potential for" insert "three"

Representative Fuhrman and R. Fisher spoke in favor of the amendment and it was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Jacobsen spoke in favor of passage of the bill and Representatives Fuhrman, Brough and Mielke spoke against it.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed House Bill No. 1177.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed House Bill No. 1177 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 64, Nays - 34, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Basich, Bray, Brown, Campbell, Carlson, Cole, G., Conway, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, R., Flemming, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Meyers, R., Miller, Morris, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Scott, Shin, Sommers, Springer, Thibaudeau, Valle, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 64.

Voting nay: Representatives Ballard, Ballasiotes, Brough, Brumsickle, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cooke, Dyer, Edmondson, Fisher, G., Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Horn, Lisk, Mastin, Mielke, Morton, Padden, Patterson, Reams, Schmidt, Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Silver, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thomas, Vance and Wood - 34

Engrossed House Bill No. 1177, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1183, by Representatives Chappell, Brumsickle, Riley, Tate, Sehlin, Ludwig, H. Myers, Johanson, Brough, Van Luven, R. Meyers, Ballard, Padden, Sheahan, Talcott, Roland, Long, Holm, Wang, Ballasiotes, Mielke, Wood, Foreman and Vance

Making it a crime for a person under age twenty-one to be under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in public.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Ludwig, Substitute House Bill No. 1183, was substituted for House Bill No. 1183 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1183 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Chappell and Padden spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1183.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1183 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute House Bill No. 1183, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1219, by Representatives Orr, Locke, Heavey, Basich, Jones, Dellwo, Dunshee, Bray, Wang, Jacobsen, R. Meyers, Springer, Veloria, G. Cole, King, Johanson and Franklin

Creating the public works administration account.

The bill was read the second time. Committee on Commerce & Labor recommendation: Majority, do pass as amended. Committee on Appropriations recommendation: Majority do pass substitute. (For committee amendment, see Journal , 47th Day, February 26, 1993.)

MOTIONS

On motion of Representative Peery, the House deferred consideration of House Bill No. 1219 and the bill held its place on the second reading calendar.

Representative Peery moved that the House immediately consider House Bill No. 1681 on today's second reading calendar. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1681, by Representatives Eide, Dyer, Pruitt, Vance, Kessler, Locke, G. Fisher, Anderson, Roland, Zellinsky, Brough, Jones, R. Meyers, Dorn, Leonard, Finkbeiner, J. Kohl and Johanson

Requiring a statement of responsibility to accompany political advertising.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Anderson, Substitute House Bill No. 1681 was substituted for House Bill No. 1681 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1681 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Eide and Reams spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

POINT OF ORDER

Representative Miller: Thank you Mr. Speaker. I would ask the Speaker to make a ruling on whether this particular piece of legislation would be amending Initiative 134?

On motion of Representative Sheldon, Substitute House Bill No. 1681 was deferred and it held its place on the second reading calendar.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved the House consider House Bill No. 1469 on the second reading calendar. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1469, by Representatives L. Johnson, Morris, Long and Thibaudeau

Clarifying that the department of social and health services is not required to reimburse certain health care costs under the limited casualty program.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Morris, Substitute House Bill No. 1469 was substituted for House Bill No. 1469 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1469 was read the second time.

Representative Riley moved the following amendment by Representative Riley and others:

On page 2, line 4, after "borne" strike all material down to and including "unit." on line 5 and insert "in the following manner: (1) In counties with a population of one hundred thousand or less, the county is not responsible for paying any of the unpaid balance, the medical care provider is responsible for paying the amount of the unpaid client liabilities which are a condition of eligibility or participation under chapter 74.09 RCW, and the department is responsible for paying the remaining unpaid balance up to the amount that the department would pay for similar services provided under Title XIX medicaid; and (2) In counties with a population of more than one hundred thousand, the unpaid balance shall be borne equally between the medical care provider and the governing unit, except that any unpaid balance in excess of two hundred thousand dollars per incident shall be borne by the department."

Representatives Riley, Mastin, Chandler and Sheahan spoke in favor of the amendment and Representatives Morris, Long, Locke, Ballard, Sommers and L. Johnson spoke against it.

Representative Riley again spoke in favor of the amendment and Representative Morris again spoke against it.

The Speaker called on the House to divide and the result of the division was 31 YEAS; 67 NAYS. The amendment was not adopted.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives L. Johnson, Dyer and Zellinsky spoke in favor of passage of the bill and Representative Riley spoke against it.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1469.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1469 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 67, Nays - 31, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballasiotes, Brough, Campbell, Carlson, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dyer, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Forner, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Long, Meyers, R., Miller, Morris, Myers, H., Ogden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Reams, Roland, Romero, Rust, Scott, Sheldon, Shin, Sommers, Springer, Talcott, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 67.

Voting nay: Representatives Ballard, Basich, Bray, Brown, Brumsickle, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Dunshee, Edmondson, Foreman, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Lisk, Ludwig, Mastin, Mielke, Morton, Orr, Padden, Rayburn, Riley, Schmidt, Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Silver, Stevens, Tate and Zellinsky - 31.

Substitute House Bill No. 1469, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

Representative Sheldon moved that the House immediately consider the following bills in the following order: House Bill No. 1512, House Bill No. 1637 and House Bill No. 1956. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1512, by Representatives Brough, Leonard, Chappell, Romero, Veloria, Riley, Karahalios, Horn, Wolfe, Ballasiotes, Talcott, G. Cole, Flemming and J. Kohl

Changing provisions relating to dependent children.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Leonard, Substitute House Bill No. 1512 was substituted for House Bill No. 1512 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1512 was read the second time.

Representative Leonard moved the following amendment by Representatives Leonard, Brough and Ludwig:

On page 6, beginning on line 33, after "shall: (a)" strike "((Approve a permanent plan of care)) Accept the" and insert "Approve a ((permanent plan of care))"

Representative Leonard spoke in favor of the amendment and the amendment was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Brough, Leonard, Karahalios and Shin spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1512.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1512 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1512, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1637, by Representatives Conway, Heavey, King, G. Cole, Basich, Kessler, G. Fisher, Karahalios, Jacobsen, Ogden and Veloria

Including municipal street railways in the definition of public work.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Horn moved the following amendment by Representative Horn and others:

On page 2, line 2, strike "((,but nothing herein shall apply to the construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any municipal street railway system)) and insert ",but nothing herein shall apply to the construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any municipal street railway system when such construction, alteration, repair, or improvement has not been approved by the voters who are to pay for the same."

Representative Horn and Long spoke in favor of the amendment and Representative Heavey spoke against it.

POINT OF ORDER

Representative Miller: Thank you Mr. Speaker. I believe it's not necessary for the speaker to speak against this amendment, to speak about who drafted the amendment, that is not germane to the amendment.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding): Representative Miller, your point of order with respect to whether this amendment was drafted by the House Republican Caucus, I think that there was an HRC at the bottom of the amendment, OPR at the bottom of others. That's not necessary an indicator of where it was actually drafted. In any event, it is a point well taken, Representative Heavey's remarks were out of order.

Representative Fuhrman demanded a electronic roll call and the demand was sustained.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on adoption of the amendment on page 2 line 2 by Representative Horn and others to House Bill No. 1637, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas- 41, Nays - 57, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Ballard, Ballasiotes, Brough, Brumsickle, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Cooke, Dyer, Edmondson, Finkbeiner, Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Hansen, Horn, Karahalios, Kohl, J., Lisk, Long, Mielke, Miller, Morton, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Reams, Schmidt, Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Silver, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thomas, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria and Wood - 41.

Voting nay: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Basich, Bray, Brown, Campbell, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Eide, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Grant, Heavey, Holm, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Kessler, King, Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Morris, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Scott, Sheldon, Shin, Sommers, Springer, Thibaudeau, Valle, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 57.

With the consent of the House, Engrossed House Bill No. 1637 was passed to the Committee on Rules for third reading.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1956, by Representatives Cothern, Locke, Wolfe and Springer; by request of Department of Social and Health Services

Requiring computerized collection of health insurance coverage provided by certain state entities.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Cothern and Dyer spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1956.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1146 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

House Bill No. 1956, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1973, by Representatives Quall, Linville, Locke, Sheldon, L. Johnson, Cothern, Basich, Kessler, Holm and J. Kohl

Allowing people to take early retirement who filed late applications.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Valle, Substitute House Bill No. 1973 was substituted for House Bill No. 1973 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1973 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Quall, Silver and Basich spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1973.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1973 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute House Bill No. 1973, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1977, by Representatives Schoesler, Sheahan, Rayburn, Chappell, Vance, Morton, Dyer, Fuhrman, Long, Chandler, Brumsickle, Foreman and Mastin

Providing for a ten year water right certificate for persons in an acreage expansion program.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Pruitt, Substitute House Bill No. 1977 was substituted for House Bill No. 1977 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1977 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Schoesler, Mastin and Sheahan spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1977.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1977 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute House Bill No. 1977, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 2023, by Representative R. Meyers

Transferring jurisdiction for certain roads and highways.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative R. Fisher, Substitute House Bill No. 2023 was substituted for House Bill No. 2023 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 2023 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative R. Fisher spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 2023.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 2023 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 97, Nays - 1, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 97.

Voting nay: Representative Heavey - 1.

Substitute House Bill No. 2023, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 4013, by Representatives Kessler, Basich, Riley, Jones, Holm and J. Kohl

Petitioning the federal government for coastal economic recovery investment.

The memorial was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Kessler, Forner, Basich and Van Luven spoke in favor of passage of the memorial.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Joint Memorial No. 4013.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Joint Memorial No. 4013 and the memorial passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

House Joint Memorial No. 4013, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

The Speaker assumed the chair.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved that the House consider the following bills in the following order: House Bill No. 1146 and House Bill No. 1369. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1146, by Representatives Heavey, King, G. Cole, Veloria, Orr, Quall, Dunshee, Franklin, Scott, Ludwig, Jones, Basich, Springer and J. Kohl

Requiring compliance with chapter 39.12 RCW of public works.

The bill was read the second time. Committee on Commerce & Labor recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute. Committee on Appropriations recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute by Committee on Commerce & Labor as amended by Committee on Appropriations. (For committee amendments see Journal, 52nd Day, March 3, 1993.)

Representative Heavey moved adoption of the committee amendment and spoke in favor of it.

Representative Chandler moved the following amendment to the committee amendment by Representatives Chandler and Lisk:

On page 1, line 5, of the amendment, after "part of" strike "the project" and insert "any construction, alteration, repair, or improvement"

Representative Chandler spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment to the committee amendment and Representative Heavey spoke against it. The amendment to the committee amendment was not adopted.

The Speaker stated the question to be adoption of the committee amendment and it was adopted.

Representative Lisk moved the following amendment by Representatives Lisk and Chandler:

On page 1, line 6, after "Any" strike "work,"

Representative Lisk spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and Representative Heavey spoke against it. The amendment was not adopted.

Representative Horn moved the following amendment by Representative Horn.

On page 1, line 10, after "39.12 RCW" insert "This chapter and chapter 39.12 RCW shall not apply to the renovation or construction of common schools in the state."

Representatives Horn, Carlson, Thomas, Vance and Brumsickle spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment and Representative Heavey spoke against it. The amendment was not adopted.

Representative Heavey again spoke against the amendment and Representative Horn again spoke in favor of it.

POINT OF ORDER

Representative Van Luven: Thank you Mr. Speaker. This is the last time I want to hear him talk about some of my friends and neighbors down in Mexico like he does. It personally offends me, those people are very good people, they're hard workers, they come across, many of my friends across legally.

Mr. Speaker: Representative Van Luven, I'm not sure we can honor your request about what you can or can't hear but I will ask Representative Heavey to stick to the manner at hand.

Representative Vance demanded an electronic roll call and the demand was sustained.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on adoption of the amendment on page 1, line 10 by Representative Horn to House Bill No. 1146 and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 42, Nays - 56, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Brough, Brumsickle, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cooke, Dorn, Dyer, Edmondson, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Hansen, Horn, Leonard, Lisk, Long, Mielke, Miller, Morton, Padden, Reams, Roland, Schmidt, Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Silver, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Wolfe and Wood - 42.

Voting nay: Representatives Appelwick, Basich, Bray, Brown, Campbell, Cole, G., Conway, Cothern, Dellwo, Dunshee, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Grant, Heavey, Holm, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Linville, Locke, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Morris, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Riley, Romero, Rust, Scott, Shin, Sommers, Springer, Thibaudeau, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 56.

Representative Ballasiotes moved the adoption of the following amendment by Representatives Ballasiotes and Padden:

On page 1, line 10, after "39.12 RCW" insert "This chapter and chapter 39.12 RCW shall not apply to the renovation or construction of a correctional facility.

Representatives Ballasiotes and Padden spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment and Representative Heavey spoke against it.

Representative Fuhrman demanded an electronic roll call and the demand was sustained.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on adoption of the amendment on page 1, line 10 by Representatives Ballasiotes and Padden to House Bill No. 1146, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 37, Nays - 61, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Ballard, Ballasiotes, Brough, Brumsickle, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cooke, Dyer, Edmondson, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Hansen, Horn, Lisk, Long, Mielke, Miller, Morton, Padden, Reams, Roland, Schmidt, Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Silver, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thomas, Vance, Van Luven and Wood - 37.

Voting nay: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Basich, Bray, Brown, Campbell, Cole, G., Conway, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Grant, Heavey, Holm, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Morris, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Riley, Romero, Rust, Scott, Shin, Sommers, Springer, Thibaudeau, Valle, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 61.

Representative Schoesler moved adoption of the following amendment by Representatives Schoesler and Sheahan:

On page 1, line 10, after "39.12 RCW' insert "This chapter and chapter 39.12 RCW shall not apply to counties with a population of less than seventy thousand."

Representatives Schoesler and Sheahan spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and Representative Heavey spoke against it. The amendment was not adopted.

Representative Brumsickle moved the following amendment by Representative Brumsickle:

On page 1, line 10, after "39.12 RCW" insert "This chapter and chapter 39.12 RCW shall not apply to the renovation or construction of buildings at an institution of higher education as defined in RCW 28B.10.016."

Representative Brumsickle spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and Representative Heavey spoke against it. The amendment was not adopted.

Representative Lisk moved adoption of the following amendment by Representatives Lisk and Chandler:

On page 1, strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

"Sec. 1. RCW 43.82.015 and 1987 c 321 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

State agencies shall not cause the major renovation of a facility owned by a private party or a facility of new construction to be built by a private party through a contract to rent, lease or purchase at least eighty percent of such facility for occupation by ((a)) state ((agency)) unless the agreement requires the contractor or developer to comply with the prevailing wage provisions of chapter 39.12 RCW. This section shall not apply to any construction project for which a call for competitive bids was made before July 26, 1987."

Representative Lisk spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and Representative Heavey spoke against it. The amendment was not adopted.

Representative Lisk moved the following amendment by Representatives Lisk and Chandler:

On page 1, strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

"Sec. 1. RCW 39.04.010 and 1989 c 363 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

The term state shall include the state of Washington and all departments, supervisors, commissioners and agencies thereof.

The term municipality shall include every city, county, town, district or other public agency thereof which is authorized by law to require the execution of public work, except drainage districts, diking districts, diking and drainage improvement districts, drainage improvement districts, diking improvement districts, consolidated diking and drainage improvement districts, consolidated drainage improvement districts, consolidated diking improvement districts, irrigation districts or any such other districts as shall from time to time be authorized by law for the reclamation or development of waste or undeveloped lands.

The term public work shall include all work, construction, alteration, repair, major renovation, or improvement other than ordinary maintenance, executed at the cost of the state or of any municipality, or which is by law a lien or charge on any property therein, but nothing herein shall apply to the construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any municipal street railway system. All public works, including maintenance when performed by contract shall comply with the provisions of RCW 39.12.020.

The term contract shall mean a contract in writing for the execution of public work for a fixed or determinable amount duly awarded after advertisement and competitive bid. However, a contract which is awarded from a small works roster under the authority of RCW 39.04.150, 35.22.620, 28B.10.355, 35.82.075, and 57.08.050 need not be advertised."

Representative Lisk spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and Representative Heavey spoke against it. The amendment was not adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

Engrossed House Bill No. 1146 was passed to the Committee on Rules for third reading.

MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

March 11, 1993

Mr. Speaker:

The Senate has passed:

ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 5217,

SENATE BILL NO. 5363,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5418,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5520,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5704,

SENATE BILL NO. 5725,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5889,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5913,

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Brad Hendrickson, Deputy Secretary

HOUSE BILL NO. 1369, by Representatives Jacobsen, Brumsickle, Quall, Pruitt, Wood, Basich, G. Cole, Carlson, Orr, Bray, Rayburn, Finkbeiner, Flemming, Kessler, J. Kohl, Shin, Campbell, Lemmon, Johanson, Jones and L. Johnson

Changing provisions relating to vocational education.

The bill was read the second time. Committee on Revenue recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute. Committee on Higher Education recommendation: Majority do pass as amended by Committee on Higher Education as amended by Committee on Revenue (For committee amendment, see Journal 57th Day, March 8, 1993.)

On motion of Representative Jacobsen, Substitute House Bill No. 1369 was substituted for House Bill No. 1369 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1369 was read the second time.

Representative G. Fisher moved adoption of the committee amendment and spoke in favor of the amendment. The committee amendment was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

The Speaker called upon Representative R. Meyers to preside.

Representatives Jacobsen and Brumsickle spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1369.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1369 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 97, Nays - 1, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 97.

Voting nay: Representative Reams - 1.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1369, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

STATEMENT FOR THE JOURNAL

Please change my vote on Substitute House Bill No. 1369 to "YEA" instead of "NAY".

BILL REAMS, 48th District

HOUSE BILL NO. 1495, by Representatives Dorn, Brough, Ogden, Rayburn, G. Cole, Springer and G. Fisher

Changing local effort assistance distribution.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Dorn and Brough spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1495.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1495 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

House Bill No. 1495, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1509, by Representatives Locke, Sommers, Silver, Jacobsen, Ludwig and Bray

Increasing flexibility of institutions of higher education.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Valle, Substitute House Bill No. 1509 was substituted for House Bill No. 1509 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1509 was read the second time.

Representative Mielke moved adoption of the following amendment by Representative Mielke:

On page 3, following line 3, insert "(3) Any purchase of goods or services by an institution of higher education which exceeds fifteen thousand dollars must be by a formal sealed bid process which allows both public and private entities to compete for the contract."

Representative Mielke spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and Representative Locke spoke against it. The amendment was not adopted.

Representative Locke moved the adoption of the following amendment by Representatives Locke and Sommers:

On page 19, line 33, after "act" insert "and the estimated interest on operating fees revenue"

Representative Locke spoke in favor of the amendment and it was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Locke and Silver spoke in favor of final passage of the bill.

The Speaker (R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1509.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1509 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1509, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1520, by Representatives Holm, Brumsickle, Wolfe, Chappell, Sheldon, Romero, Dorn, Basich, Kessler, Jones, Zellinsky, Pruitt, Brough, Cothern, Riley, King, R. Meyers, Rayburn and Quall; by request of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Expanding the use of skill centers.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Valle, Substitute House Bill No. 1520 was substituted for House Bill No. 1520 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1520 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Holm and Brough spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1520.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1520 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute House Bill No. 1520, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1580, by Representatives Quall, Brumsickle, Jacobsen, Bray, Rayburn, Finkbeiner, Kessler, J. Kohl, Shin, G. Fisher, Springer, Romero, R. Johnson, Linville and Basich

Requiring development of model student progression contracts.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Jacobsen, Substitute House Bill No. 1580 was substituted for House Bill No. 1580 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1580 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Quall, Casada and Carlson spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1580.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1580 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute House Bill No. 1580, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

On motion of Representative Peery, the House deferred consideration of House Bill No. 1603 and the bill held its place on the second reading calendar.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1619, by Representatives Shin, Jacobsen, Campbell, Finkbeiner, Sheldon, J. Kohl, Wood, Schoesler, Veloria, Dorn, G. Cole, Forner, Wineberry, Heavey, Edmondson, Cothern, Long, Horn, Pruitt, Quall, Basich and King

Creating the Washington Task Force on International Education and Cultural Exchanges.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Jacobsen, Substitute House Bill No. 1619 was substituted for House Bill No. 1619 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1619 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Shin and Heavey spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1619.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1619 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute House Bill No. 1619, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1820, by Representatives Dorn, Brough, Brumsickle, Heavey, Vance, Mastin, R. Meyers, Jones, Peery, Cothern, Campbell, Orr, Holm, Carlson, Springer, Stevens, Jacobsen, Thomas, Pruitt, Foreman, Finkbeiner, Lemmon, Leonard, Rayburn, Riley, Patterson, Conway, King, Johanson, Roland, Tate, Karahalios, Mielke, Eide, Wolfe, Romero, Edmondson, Morris, Shin, G. Fisher, Horn, L. Johnson, Thibaudeau, Kremen, Basich, Miller, J. Kohl, H. Myers, Long, Cooke, Fuhrman, Van Luven, Talcott, Forner, Ballasiotes, Hansen, Kessler, Silver and Wood

Creating the school-to-work transitions program.

The bill was read the second time. Committee on Education recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute. Committee on Appropriation recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute by Committee on Education as amended by Committee by Appropriations. (For committee amendments see Journal, 57th Day, March 8, 1993.)

On motion of Representative Dorn, Substitute House Bill No. 1820 was substituted for House Bill No. 1820 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar. The motion was carried.

Substitute House Bill No. 1820 was read the second time.

Representative Valle moved adoption of the committee amendments and spoke in favor of them. The committee amendments were adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Dorn, Brough and Pruitt spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1820.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1820 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute Engrossed House Bill No. 1820, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

On motion of Representative Peery, the House deferred consideration of House Bill No. 1988 and it held its place on the second reading calendar.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1993, by Representatives Finkbeiner, Jacobsen, Quall, Wood, Brumsickle, Ogden, Basich, Dellwo and Miller

Making technical amendments to the future teachers and the health professionals conditional scholarship programs to continue existing repayment regulations.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Peery, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Finkbeiner spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1993.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1993 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

House Bill No. 1993, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1997, by Representatives Quall, Jacobsen, Ogden, Brumsickle, Miller, Basich, Shin, Locke, Wood, Silver and J. Kohl

Redefining the relationship between the state and its postsecondary institutions.

The bill was read the second time. Committee on Higher Education recommendation: Majority, do pass as amended. Committee on Appropriations recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute. (For committee amendments see Journal, 57th Day, March 8, 1993.)

On motion of Representative Jacobsen, Substitute House Bill No. 1997 was substituted for House Bill No. 1997 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1997 was read the second time.

Representative Valle moved the committee amendments and spoke in favor or them. The committee amendments were adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Quall spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1997.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1997 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1997, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 2029, by Representatives Dorn, Brough, Holm, Zellinsky and Rayburn; by request of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Changing funding procedures for high school students enrolled in the running start program in community or technical colleges.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Dorn and Brough spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker assumed the chair.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 2029.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 2029 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

House Bill No. 2029, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

SIGNED BY THE SPEAKER

The Speaker announced he was signing:

ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO. 1303,

HOUSE BILL NO. 2066, by Representatives J. Kohl, Wang, G. Cole, Silver, Leonard, R. Fisher, Patterson, Peery, Locke, Pruitt, Brough, Cothern, Appelwick and Eide

Changing school levy provisions.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives J. Kohl, Thomas, Dorn and Silver spoke in favor of passage of the bill and Representative Campbell spoke against it.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 2066.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 2066 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 89, Nays - 9, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Carlson, Casada, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 89.

Voting nay: Representatives Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Chandler, Finkbeiner, Hansen, Heavey, Morris and Padden - 9.

House Bill No. 2066, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved the House immediately consider House Bill No. 1988 on today's second reading calendar. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1988, by Representatives Sheldon, Forner, Wineberry, Wood, Shin, Jones, Peery, Roland, Flemming, Quall, Springer, Conway, Morris, Valle, Dorn, Campbell, Linville, Karahalios, Eide, J. Kohl, H. Myers, Kessler, Holm, Wang, Wolfe, Anderson, Appelwick, Orr, Ogden, G. Cole, Scott, Lemmon, Leonard, Locke, R. Fisher, L. Johnson, Rayburn, Pruitt and Patterson

Providing for employment and training services.

The bill was read the second time. Committee on Trade, Economic Development & Housing recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute. Committee on Appropriations recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute by Committee on Trade, Economic Development & Housing as amended by Committee on Appropriations. (For committee amendment see Journal, 57th Day, March 8, 1993.)

On motion of Representative Wineberry, Substitute House Bill No. 1988 was substituted for House Bill No. 1988 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1988 was read the second time.

Representative Valle moved adoption of the amendment and spoke in favor of the amendment. The committee amendment was adopted.

Representative Sheldon moved the adoption of the following amendment by Representative Sheldon:

On page 1, on line 16, strike "may" and insert "many"

Representative Sheldon spoke in favor of the amendment and it was adopted.

Representative Jacobsen moved adoption of the following amendment by Representative Jacobsen, Wineberry and Sheldon:

On page 3, line 6, after "services" insert ", including financial aid,"

On page 4, line 11, after "services" insert ", including financial aid,"

On page 4, line 32, after "services" insert ", including financial aid,"

On page 5, after line 10, insert the following new subsection:

"(3) First priority for receipt of financial aid funds provided through chapter ..., Laws of 1993 (this act) shall be given to those eligible individuals who are needy students as defined in RCW 28B.10.802(3) and who are attending technical colleges."

On page 18, line 12, strike "twenty-six million four hundred" and insert "twenty-five million nine hundred"

On page 18, line 13, after "enrollments," insert "five-hundred thousand dollars shall provide for financial aid for individuals being trained under this section at technical colleges,"

Representatives Jacobsen and Sheldon spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and Representative Forner spoke against it. The amendment was adopted.

Representative Sheldon moved adoption of the following amendment by Representatives Sheldon, Conway and Wineberry:

On page 3, line 33, strike "three" insert "four".

Representatives Sheldon and Forner spoke in favor of the amendment and it was adopted.

Representative Locke moved adoption of the following amendment by Representative Locke:

On page 4 after line 6, insert the following:

"NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. Aerospace workers unemployed as the result of downsizing and restructuring of the aerospace industry will be deemed to be dislocated workers for the purpose of commissioner approval of training under RCW 50.20.043."

The Speaker called on Representative Wang to preside.

Representative Locke spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and Representative Forner spoke against it.

Representative Locke again spoke in favor of the amendment and Representative Forner again spoke against it.

POINT OF INQUIRY

Representative Locke yielded to a question by Representative Carlson.

Representative Carlson: Representative Locke, If this new section 5 is passed and becomes part of the bill will that additional cost come be from the trust fund.

Representative Locke: Representative Carlson, It's from the trust fund but it's not being affected because these individuals are already or would normally be collecting unemployment in any event. They will stand in line like anybody else for unemployment. The only question is because they are collecting unemployment and Boeing is giving them a two-thousand dollar education allowance does the more fact that they are getting that education allowance disqualify that person from getting unemployment. The commissioner is looking at it on a case-by-case basis and if the commissioner does it by case-by-case basis he's going to allow unemployment compensation to be given out and the education allowance but that would require a huge bureaucracy. This says that you don't have to do it on a case-by-case basis with respect to perhaps certain job classifications, some jobs classifications will not be eligible perhaps for both unemployment or for the educational allowance because that person might need a job which that person is easily trainable or can get into another job quickly, but this is really trying to streamline the administrative process. These are people who are going to collect unemployment anyway, these are people who are getting an education allowance paid for by Boeing and the employees, the question is, should they be denied those benefits except on a case-by-case review by the Employment Commissioner.

Representative Heavey demanded an electronic roll call and it was sustained.

The Speaker assumed the chair.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll of adoption of the amendment on page 4 after line 6 by Representative Locke and others to Substitute House Bill No. 1988 and the amendment was adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 88, Nays - 10, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Miller, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 88.

Voting nay: Representatives Ballard, Edmondson, Forner, Fuhrman, Mielke, Morris, Morton, Padden, Stevens and Thomas - 10.

Representative Linville moved adoption of the amendment by Representative Linville:

On page 18, after line 5, insert the following:

"NEW SECTION. Sec. 13. Prior to any increase in the employer tax schedule as provided in sec. 10 of this act, the commissioner shall provide a report to the appropriate committees of the legislature specifying to what extent the work force training expenditures in this act elevated employer contribution rates for the effective tax schedule.

Representatives Linville and Wineberry spoke in favor of the amendment and it was adopted.

Representative Linville moved the following amendment by Representative Linville:

On page 19, line 2, after "achieved" insert ". The department also shall include in its report the number of repeat clients as a percentage of all clients served by programs provided in this act"

Representatives Linville and Forner spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and it was adopted.

Representative Sheldon moved adoption of the following amendment by Representative Sheldon:

On page 19, beginning on line 32, strike all of section 19 and insert

"NEW SECTION. Sec. 19:

(1) Sections 7 and 9 of this act shall take effect June 30, 1999;

(2) Section 11 of this act shall take effect on January 1, 1998."

Representative Sheldon spoke in favor of the amendment and it was adopted.

Representative Forner moved adoption of the following striking amendment by Representative Forner:

Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert:

"NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 28C.18 RCW to read as follows:

(1) It is the intent of the legislature, to the extent possible, that all public funds related to training and retraining be deposited in a single account administered by the board.

(2) The state job training trust fund is created in the custody of the state treasurer. All state and federal general fund appropriations for training and retraining, including but not limited to programs currently administered or provided by the employment security department, the state board for community and technical colleges, the workforce training and education coordinating board, the department of social and health services, the department of labor and industries, the higher education coordinating board, the Washington institute of applied technology, and the department of transportation, shall be deposited into the fund. Only the director of the workforce training and education coordinating board or the director's designee may authorize expenditures from the fund. Expenditures from the fund may be used only for training and retraining programs that are consistent with the board's state comprehensive plan developed under RCW 28C.18.060(4). No appropriation is required for expenditures from the fund.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. For the Biennium ending June 30, 1995, all state and federal general funds for training and retraining, including but not limited to programs traditionally administered or provided by the employment security department, the state board for community and technical colleges, the workforce training and education coordinating board, the department of social and health services, the department of labor and industries, the higher education coordinating board, the Washington institute of applied technology, and the department of transportation, shall be appropriated to the state job training trust fund.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. The governor shall designate the workforce training and education coordinating board as the administrative agency for federal training and retraining funds. The governor shall take other executive actions necessary to carry out the intent of this act.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. If any part of this act is found to be in conflict with federal requirements that are a prescribed condition to the allocation of federal funds to the state, the conflicting part of this act is hereby declared to be inoperative solely to the extent of the conflict, and such finding or determination shall not affect the operation of the remainder of this act. The rules under this act shall meet federal requirements that are a necessary condition to the receipt of federal funds by the state.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.

Representative Forner, Morton, Sheldon, Dyer and Silver spoke in favor of the amendment and

Representatives Wineberry and Campbell spoke against it.

Representative Vance demanded an electronic roll call and the demand was sustained.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on adoption of the striking amendment by Representative Forner to Substitute House Bill No. 1988, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 34, Nays - 64, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Ballard, Ballasiotes, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Cooke, Dyer, Edmondson, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Horn, Lisk, Long, Mielke, Miller, Morton, Padden, Reams, Schmidt, Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Silver, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thomas, Vance, Van Luven and Wood - 34.

Voting nay: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Basich, Bray, Campbell, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Morris, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Scott, Sheldon, Shin, Sommers, Springer, Thibaudeau, Valle, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 64.

Representative Zellinsky demanded the previous question and the demand was sustained.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1988 was passed to the Committee on Rules for third reading.

SPEAKER'S RULING

Representative Miller has made a parliamentary inquiry as to whether Substitute House Bill No. 1681 amends initiative 134 and therefore requires a two-thirds vote for passage.

Under the terms of Article 2, section 41 of the Washington Constitution, a bill which amends an initiative within two years of the measure's passage requires a two-thirds vote in each House of the Legislature.

In deciding whether a bill amends an initiative, it is necessary to recognize the difference between an "amendment" and a "supplemental act". An amendment creates an alteration or change of an existing law. A supplemental act simply adds to or extends that which is in existing law without changing or modifying the original. The Legislature may validly enact by majority vote new legislation that deals with the same general subject matter as a prior initiative so long as the essential purpose and effect of the prior initiative is not altered. Such new legislation would not be considered an amendment for purposes of Article 2, Section 41.

While provisions of initiative 134 and Substitute House Bill No. 1681 deal with the same general subject matter -- political advertising requirements -- Substitute House Bill No. 1681 does not change or modify the initiative.

Even though Substitute House Bill No. 1681 amends RCW 42.17.510, which was also amended by initiative 134, it does not amend the new language added by the initiative. The initiative added subsections (2) and (3) to RCW 42.17.510. Subsection 2 relates solely to independent expenditures by organizations other than a party organization or a campaign committee. Subsection 3 relates solely to the size of type and other means to make required disclosures explicit. In contrast, Substitute House Bill No. 1681 adds a new subsection 4, which relates solely to requiring a responsible party to accept responsibility for the accuracy of the message.

The Speaker therefore finds that Substitute House Bill No. 1681 does not amend initiative 134 within the meaning of Article 2, Section 41.

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1681, by Representatives Eide, Dyer, Pruitt, Vance, Kessler, Locke, G. Fisher, Anderson, Roland, Zellinsky, Brough, Jones, R. Meyers, Dorn, Leonard, Finkbeiner, J. Kohl and Johanson

Requiring a statement of responsibility to accompany political advertising.

Representatives Eide, Dyer, Pruitt, Foreman and Kessler spoke in favor of passage of the bill and Representative Heavey spoke against it.

The Speaker (R.Meyers presiding) assumed the chair.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1681.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1681 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 94, Nays - 4, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 94.

Voting nay: Representatives Fisher, R., Heavey, Lisk and Wang - 4.

Substitute House Bill No. 1681, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1737, by Representatives Ballasiotes, Campbell, Dyer, Morris, Thomas, Schoesler, Chappell, Dorn, Riley, Anderson, H. Myers, Mielke, Van Luven, Cooke, Scott, Foreman, Jones, Ballard, Jacobsen, Brough, Kremen, Silver, Rayburn, G. Fisher, Orr, Long, Johanson, Schmidt and Wood

Changing provisions relating to crimes against minors and developmentally disabled persons.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Appelwick, Substitute House Bill No. 1737 was substituted for House Bill No. 1737 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1737 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Ballasiotes spoke in favor of passage of the bill and Representative Heavey spoke against it.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1737.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1737 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 94, Nays - 4, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Dellwo, Dorn, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 94.

Voting nay: Representatives Cothern, Dunshee, Heavey and Wang - 4.

Substitute House Bill No. 1737, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved that the House immediately consider the following bills in the following order: House Bill No. 1603, House Bill No. 1130 and House Bill No. 1224. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1603, by Representatives Locke, Jacobsen, Quall, Shin, R. Johnson, Zellinsky, Pruitt, Carlson, Jones, Basich, Wang, Patterson, Thibaudeau, R. Meyers, Kessler, Bray, Campbell, Dorn, G. Fisher, Springer, Karahalios, Roland, Eide, Sheldon, Finkbeiner, Ogden, Orr, Wineberry, Veloria, Morris, Hansen and Wolfe

Reforming higher education tuition and financial aid.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Jacobsen, Substitute House Bill No. 1603 was substituted for House Bill No. 1603 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1603 was read the second time.

Representative Locke moved the following amendment by Representatives Locke and Jacobsen:

On page 9, line 36, strike "fifteen" and insert "fourteen"

On page 10, line 3, strike "eleven" and insert "ten"

Representative Locke spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and it was adopted.

Representative Locke moved the following amendment by Representatives Locke and Sommers:

On page 12, beginning on line 20, strike all of sections 14, 15, and 16

On page 18, line 38, after "RCW 28B.80.580;" strike all material through "(aa)" on page 19, line 2, and insert "and (y)"

Representative Locke spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and it was adopted.

Representative Locke moved the following amendment by Representative Locke and others:

On page 19, beginning on line 10, strike all of sections 20, 21, and 22

Representative Locke spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and it was adopted.

Representative Locke moved the following amendment by Representative Locke and others:

On page 15, beginning on line 7, after "community" strike "and technical"

On page 15, line 16, after "equivalent" strike "((-,)) except at technical colleges"

On page 17, after line 28, insert:

"NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. A new section is added to chapter 28B.15 RCW to read as follows:

Each technical college shall deposit two and one-half percent of revenues collected from tuition and fees into a local financial aid fund. Moneys in the fund shall be used to provide financial aid to needy students who are post high school students, and who demonstrate the financial inability to meet the total cost of board, room, books, and tuition and fees."

On page 26, after line 24, insert:

"NEW SECTION. Sec. 33. If specific funding for section 19 of this act, referencing this act by bill number, is not provided by June 30, 1993, in the omnibus appropriations act, section 19 is null and void.

Representative Locke spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and it was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Jacobsen, Sheahan, J. Kohl, Basich and Heavey spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1603.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1603 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1603, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) declared the House to be at ease.

EVENING SESSION

The Speaker called the House to order.

The Clerk called the roll and a quorum was present.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1130, by Representatives Ludwig, Riley, Ballasiotes, Basich, Brough and Orr; by request of Washington State Patrol

Modifying furlough notification requirements.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Peery, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Morris and Long spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1130.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1130 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

House Bill No. 1130, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved that the House consider the following bills in the following order: House Bill No. 1244, House Bill No. 1246 and House Bill No. 1255. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1244, by Representatives Franklin, Heavey, King, G. Cole, Springer, Jones and Veloria

Providing for payments for time lost from work while attending a medical examination for industrial insurance.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives G. Cole spoke in favor of passage of the bill and Representative Lisk spoke against it.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1244.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1244 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 94, Nays - 4, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 94.

Voting nay: Representatives Fuhrman, Lisk, Morton and Sheahan - 4.

House Bill No. 1244, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1246, by Representatives G. Cole, Heavey, King, Franklin, Jones, Veloria and Johanson

Revising provisions for maintaining employee benefits for temporarily disabled workers.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative G. Cole spoke in favor of passage of the bill and Representative Lisk spoke against it.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1246.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1246 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 70, Nays - 28, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Campbell, Carlson, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Morris, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Scott, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Thibaudeau, Valle, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 70.

Voting nay: Representatives Ballard, Ballasiotes, Brumsickle, Casada, Chandler, Cooke, Dyer, Edmondson, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Horn, Lisk, Long, Mielke, Miller, Morton, Padden, Reams, Schmidt, Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thomas and Vance - 28.

House Bill No. 1246, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1255, by Representatives Dellwo, Morris, Dyer, Flemming and Wood; by request of Department of Health

Requiring podiatric physicians and surgeons to have one year of postgraduate podiatric medical training.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives L. Johnson and Ballasiotes spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1255.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1255 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

House Bill No. 1255, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1395, by Representatives Scott, Long, G. Cole, Riley, Johanson, Leonard, Ogden, King and Locke

Allowing counties to impose additional marriage license fees for funding family services.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Scott, Long, Leonard and Talcott spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

Representatives Fuhrman and Padden spoke against passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1395.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1395 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 75, Nays - 23, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Campbell, Carlson, Cole, G., Conway, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Miller, Morris, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Scott, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Talcott, Thibaudeau, Valle, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 75.

Voting nay: Representatives Ballard, Ballasiotes, Brumsickle, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cooke, Forner, Fuhrman, Horn, Lisk, Mielke, Morton, Padden, Reams, Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Stevens, Tate, Thomas, Vance and Van Luven - 23.

House Bill No. 1395, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1500, by Representatives R. Johnson, Dyer, L. Johnson and Mastin

Modifying hearing aid regulatory authority.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative L. Johnson, Substitute House Bill No. 1500 was substituted for House Bill No. 1500 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1500 was read the second time.

Representative R. Johnson moved the following amendment by Representatives R. Johnson, Flemming and Dyer:

On page 6, line 32, strike "six" and insert "seven"

On page 6, line 37, after "One" insert "advisory nonvoting"

On page 7, line 15, after "year." insert "In event of a tie, the issue shall be brought to a second vote and the chair shall refrain from voting."

Representative R. Johnson spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and the amendment was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives R. Johnson and Ballasiotes spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1500.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1500 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1500, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1528, by Representatives Dunshee, Locke and R. Meyers; by request of Office of Financial Management

Modifying the state's cash management system.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Valle, Substitute House Bill No. 1528 was substituted for House Bill No. 1528 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1528 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Dunshee and Silver spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1528.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1528 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 95, Nays - 3, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 95.

Voting nay: Representatives Cole, G., Heavey and Quall - 3.

Substitute House Bill No. 1528, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1612, by Representatives Morton, King, Basich, Kremen, Sheldon, Foreman, Fuhrman, Chandler and Padden

Testing the feasibility of remote site incubators for salmon enhancement.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Valle, Substitute House Bill No. 1612 was substituted for House Bill No. 1612 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1612 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Morton spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1612.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1612 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute House Bill No. 1612, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved that the House defer consideration of House Bill 1761 and the bill hold its place on the second reading calendar. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1764, by Representatives Basich, Dorn, Carlson, Jacobsen, Wood, Roland, Karahalios, Eide, Brumsickle, G. Cole, Rayburn, G. Fisher, Leonard, Linville, Wineberry, Kremen, Pruitt, Brough, Wang, Quall, Flemming, Johanson, L. Johnson, J. Kohl, H. Myers, Hansen, Patterson and Anderson

Encouraging common schools serving students in grades seven through twelve to offer opportunities for students to do volunteer community service.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Basich spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1764.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1764 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

House Bill No. 1764, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1818, by Representatives Karahalios, Sehlin, R. Meyers, Schmidt, Peery, Wood, Zellinsky, Edmondson, Stevens, Schoesler, Flemming, Mielke, Thomas, Foreman, Eide, Campbell, Pruitt, Holm and Talcott

Providing for military dependent communities.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Valle, Substitute House Bill No. 1818 was substituted for House Bill No. 1818 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar. The motion was carried.

Substitute House Bill No. 1818 was read the second time.

Representative Karahalios moved adoption of the following amendment by Representatives Karahalios, Wood, Peery and Locke:

On page 1, line 5, strike "closures" and insert "expansions, closures,"

On page 1, line 10, after "base" insert "expansions or"

On page 1, line 15, strike "a reduction of"

On page 2, line 7, strike "significant reduction" and insert "change"

On page 2, line 33, after "assistance account" insert ", department of trade and economic development, employment security department, and department of transportation"

Representatives Karahalios, Forner and Conway spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and it was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Karahalios, Campbell, Sehlin and Forner spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1818.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1818 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1818, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1844, by Representatives Horn, Rust, Van Luven, Appelwick, Wineberry, Edmondson, Forner, Brumsickle, Long, Foreman, Chandler, Dyer, Ballard, Cooke, Miller, Vance, Finkbeiner, Reams and Silver

Establishing procedures by which owners of single-family residences may use lake water for noncommercial landscape irrigation.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Pruitt, Substitute House Bill No. 1844 was substituted for House Bill No. 1844 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1844 was read the second time.

Representative Horn moved the following amendment by Representative Horn and others:

On page 3, line 37, strike subsection (8)

Representatives Horn, Rust and Morton spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and Representative Pruitt spoke against it.

The Speaker divided the House. The result of the division was 48 YEAS; 48 NAYS. The amendment was declared lost.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Horn, Pruitt and Morton spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1844.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1844 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 92, Nays - 6, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 92.

Voting nay: Representatives Dunshee, Fisher, G., Morris, Patterson, Romero and Springer - 6.

Substitute House Bill No. 1844, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1849, by Representatives Zellinsky, Mielke, Peery, Kessler, Dyer, R. Johnson, Jones, R. Meyers, Jacobsen and Kremen

Providing for security of automated teller machines and night depositories.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Zellinsky, Substitute House Bill No. 1849 was substituted for House Bill No. 1849 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1849 was read the second time.

Representative R. Meyers moved the following amendment by Representative R. Meyers:

On page 5, line 26, after "issued on or" delete "before" and insert "after"

Representatives R.Meyers and Mielke spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and it was adopted.

Representative R. Meyers moved the following amendment by Representative R. Meyers:

On page 3, line 16, after "safety," strike "substantial"

On page 3, line 17, after "chapter." strike all material through "facility." on line 22

On page 6, after line 16, insert the following:

"NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. Compliance with the objective standards and information requirements of this chapter is prima facie evidence that the operator of the automated teller machine or night deposit facility in question has provided adequate measures for the safety of users of the automated teller machine or night depository."

Representative R. Meyers spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and it was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Zellinsky and Mielke spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1849.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1849 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 97, Nays - 1, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 97.

Voting nay: Representative Heavey - 1.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1849, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved that the House consider the following bills in the following order: House Bill No. 1249, House Bill No. 1761, and House Bill No. 1897 on the second reading calendar. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1249, by Representatives Heavey, King, Franklin, Orr, G. Cole, Jones, Veloria, Johanson and R. Meyers

Increasing industrial insurance partial disability awards.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Locke, Substitute House Bill No. 1249 was substituted for House Bill No. 1249 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1249 was read the second time.

Representative Heavey moved adoption of the following amendment by Representative Heavey and others:

On page 3, line 9, after "by" strike "thirty-two" and insert "thirty-five"

On page 4, line 12, strike "seventeen thousand" and insert "twenty-one thousand five hundred

On page 4, line 24, after "hundred" strike "seventeen thousand" and insert "twenty-one thousand five hundred

Representative Heavey spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and it was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Heavey, Conway, King, Silver, Morton and Foreman spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

Representatives Lisk and Horn spoke against the passage of the bill.

Representative Heavey again spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1249.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No 1249 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 83, Nays - 14, Absent - 1, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Scott, Sehlin, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 83.

Voting nay: Representatives Ballard, Brumsickle, Chandler, Chappell, Edmondson, Grant, Horn, Lisk, Mastin, Morris, Morton, Schoesler, Sheahan and Stevens - 14.

Absent: Representative Veloria - 1.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1249, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1761, by Representatives H. Myers, Edmondson, Bray, Pruitt, Appelwick, R. Fisher, Wineberry, Peery, Wood, Eide, Cothern, Ogden, Jones, Ludwig, Riley, Ballard, Springer, Linville, Rayburn, Kessler, Brown, Long, Chandler, Foreman, Mastin, Johanson, Sehlin, L. Johnson, Morris, Karahalios, Lemmon, Hansen, Cooke and Forner

Clarifying and extending dates established under the growth management act.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative H. Myers, Substitute House Bill No. 1761 was substituted for House Bill No. 1761 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1761 was read the second time.

Representative H. Meyers moved the striking amendment by Representative H. Myers:

Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

"Sec. 1. RCW 36.70A.040 and 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) Each county that has both a population of fifty thousand or more and has had its population increase by more than ten percent in the previous ten years, and the cities located within such county, and any other county regardless of its population that has had its population increase by more than twenty percent in the previous ten years, and the cities located within such county, shall ((adopt comprehensive land use plans and development regulations under)) conform with all of the requirements of this chapter. However, the county legislative authority of such a county with a population of less than fifty thousand population may adopt a resolution removing the county, and the cities located within the county, from the requirements of adopting comprehensive land use plans and development regulations under this chapter if this resolution is adopted and filed with the department by December 31, 1990, for counties initially meeting this set of criteria, or within sixty days of the date the office of financial management certifies that a county meets this set of criteria under subsection (5) of this section.

Once a county meets either of these sets of criteria, the requirement to conform with ((RCW 36.70A.040 through 36.70A.160)) all of the requirements of this chapter remains in effect, even if the county no longer meets one of these sets of criteria.

(2) The county legislative authority of any county that does not meet ((the requirements of)) either of the sets of criteria established under subsection (1) of this section may adopt a resolution indicating its intention to have subsection (1) of this section apply to the county. Each city, located in a county that chooses to plan under this subsection, shall ((adopt a comprehensive land use plan in accordance with)) conform with all of the requirements of this chapter. Once such a resolution has been adopted, the county ((cannot remove itself from)) and the cities located within the county remain subject to all of the requirements of this chapter.

(3) Any county or city that is initially required to ((adopt a comprehensive land use plan)) conform with all of the requirements of this chapter under subsection (1) of this section shall take actions under this chapter as follows: (a) The county legislative authority shall adopt a county-wide planning policy under RCW 36.70A.210; (b) the county legislative authority and governing body of each city located within the county shall designate critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands, and adopt development regulations conserving these designated lands and protecting these designated critical areas, under RCW 36.70A.170 and 36.70A.060; (c) the county legislative authority shall designate and take other actions related to urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110; (d) the county legislative authority and governing body of each city located within the county shall adopt ((the)) a comprehensive plan under this chapter on or before ((July 1, 1993)) a date from January 1, 1994, through August 1, 1994, as specified by the department under RCW 36.70A.045; and (e) the county legislative authority and each city governing body shall adopt development regulations that are consistent with and implement its comprehensive plan by the same date it is required to adopt its comprehensive plan, but a county or city may obtain an extension for this deadline by the shorter of an additional six months or until December 31, 1994, by submitting a letter to the department of community development prior to the deadline for adopting both a comprehensive plan and development regulations stating its need for the extension, detailing reasons for the needed extension, and proposing a schedule of actions that will be taken leading to the adoption of the development regulations.

(4) Any county or city that is required to ((adopt a comprehensive land use plan)) conform with all the requirements of this chapter, as a result of the county legislative authority adopting its resolution of intention under subsection (2) of this section, shall take actions under this chapter as follows: (a) The county legislative authority shall adopt a county-wide planning policy under RCW 36.70A.210; (b) the county legislative authority and governing body of each city that is located within the county shall adopt development regulations conserving agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands it designated under RCW 36.70A.060 within one year of the date the county legislative authority adopts its resolution of intention; (c) the county legislative authority shall designate and take other actions related to urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110; and (d) the county legislative authority and governing body of each city that is located within the county shall adopt ((the)) a comprehensive plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan not later than ((three)) four years one month from the date the county legislative ((body takes action as required by subsection (2) of this section)) authority adopts its resolution of intention, but a county or city may obtain an additional six months before it is required to have adopted its development regulations by submitting a letter to the department of community development prior to the deadline for adopting both a comprehensive plan and development regulations stating its need for the extension, detailing reasons for the needed extension, and proposing a schedule of actions that will be taken leading to the adoption of the development regulations.

(((4))) (5) If the office of financial management certifies that the population of a county that previously had not been required to plan under subsection (1) or (2) of this section has changed sufficiently to meet either of the ((requirements of)) sets of criteria specified under subsection (1) of this section, and where applicable, the county legislative authority has not adopted a resolution removing the county from these requirements as provided in subsection (1) of this section, the county and each city within such county shall ((adopt)) take actions under this chapter as follows: (a) The county legislative authority shall adopt a county-wide planning policy under RCW 36.70A.210; (b) the county legislative authority and each city governing body shall adopt development regulations under RCW 36.70A.060 conserving agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands it designated within one year of the certification by the office of financial management; (((b))) (c) the county legislative authority shall designate and take other actions related to urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110; and (d) the county legislative authority and each city governing body shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan ((under this chapter)) and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan within ((three)) four years one month of the certification by the office of financial management((; and (c) development regulations pursuant to this chapter within one year of having adopted its comprehensive land use plan)), but a county or city may obtain an additional six months before it is required to have adopted its development regulations by submitting a letter to the department of community development prior to the deadline for adopting both a comprehensive plan and development regulations stating its need for the extension, detailing reasons for the needed extension, and proposing a schedule of actions that will be taken leading to the adoption of the development regulations.

(6) A copy of each document that is required under this section shall be submitted to the department at the time of its adoption.

Sec. 2. RCW 36.70A.045 and 1991 sp.s. c 32 s 15 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) By no later than June 1, 1993, the department ((may)) shall adopt a schedule ((to permit)) phasing ((of)) the dates, from January 1, 1994, through July 31, 1994, on or before which each county initially required to plan under all the requirements of this chapter by RCW 36.70A.040(1), and each city located within the county, must adopt a comprehensive plan ((submittal for counties and cities planning under RCW 36.70A.040. This schedule shall not permit a comprehensive plan to be submitted greater than one hundred eighty days past the date that the plan was required to be submitted and shall be used)) under this chapter.

To facilitate expeditious review and interjurisdictional coordination of comprehensive plans and development regulations, the date designated on or before which a county must adopt a comprehensive plan shall be the same date designated on or before which each city located in that county must adopt its comprehensive plan. Where a city is located in more than one of such counties that have differing designated dates, the department shall designate which date applies to that city.

(2) The following criteria shall be used by the department in establishing this schedule: (a) How close the county and cities in the county are to adopting their comprehensive plans; (b) the extent of a consensus between the county and cities in the county over a date; (c) the relative financial burdens on the county and the cities in the county to prepare, consider, and adopt their comprehensive plans; and (d) the sufficiency of opportunities the public has had to provide input into the planning process in the county and the cities in the county. This schedule does not have to evenly spread the deadlines for counties over this period and may designate deadlines for all or most of these counties at the end of this period.

Sec. 3. RCW 36.70A.110 and 1991 sp.s. c 32 s 29 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) Each county that is required or chooses to ((adopt a comprehensive land use)) plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature. Each city that is located in such a county shall be included within an urban growth area. An urban growth area may include more than a single city. An urban growth area may include territory that is located outside of a city only if such territory already is characterized by urban growth or is adjacent to territory already characterized by urban growth.

(2) Based upon the population growth management planning population projection made for the county by the office of financial management, the urban growth areas in the county shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is projected to occur in the county for the succeeding twenty-year period. Each urban growth area shall permit urban densities and shall include greenbelt and open space areas. Within one year of July 1, 1990, each county ((required to designate urban growth areas)) that as of June 1, 1991, was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, shall begin consulting with each city located within its boundaries and each city shall propose the location of an urban growth area. Within sixty days of the date the county legislative authority of a county adopts its resolution of intention or of certification by the office of financial management, all other counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall begin this consultation with each city located within its boundaries. The county shall attempt to reach agreement with each city on the location of an urban growth area within which the city is located. If such an agreement is not reached with each city located within the urban growth area, the county shall justify in writing why it so designated the area an urban growth area. A city may object formally with the department over the designation of the urban growth area within which it is located. Where appropriate, the department shall attempt to resolve the conflicts, including the use of mediation services.

(3) Urban growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both existing public facilities and services and any additional needed public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that urban government services be provided by cities, and urban government services should not be provided in rural areas.

(4) On or before October 1, 1993, each county that was initially required to plan under RCW 36.70A.040(1) shall designate urban growth areas under this chapter. Within three years and three months of the date the county legislative authority of a county adopts its resolution of intention or of certification by the office of financial management, all other counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall designate urban growth areas under this chapter. A permit or other authorization allowing land use activities not already vested shall not be issued or approved by a county or city after the county designates its urban growth areas if the permit or other authorization is inconsistent with these designations.

(5) Each county shall include designations of urban growth areas in its comprehensive plan.

Sec. 4. RCW 36.70A.120 and 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 s 12 are each amended to read as follows:

((Within one year of the adoption of its comprehensive plan, each county and city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall enact development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. These counties and cities)) Each county and city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall perform ((their)) its activities and make capital budget decisions in conformity with ((their)) its comprehensive plan((s)).

Sec. 5. RCW 36.70A.210 and 1991 sp.s. c 32 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) The legislature recognizes that counties are regional governments within their boundaries, and cities are primary providers of urban governmental services within urban growth areas. For the purposes of this section, a "county-wide planning policy" is a written policy statement or statements used solely for establishing a county-wide framework from which county and city comprehensive plans are developed and adopted pursuant to this chapter. This framework shall ensure that city and county comprehensive plans are consistent as required in RCW 36.70A.100. Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter the land-use powers of cities.

(2) The legislative authority of a county that plans under RCW 36.70A.040 shall adopt a county-wide planning policy in cooperation with the cities located in whole or in part within the county as follows:

(a) No later than sixty calendar days from July 16, 1991, the legislative authority of ((the)) each county that as of June 1, 1991, was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall convene a meeting with representatives of each city located within the county for the purpose of establishing a collaborative process that will provide a framework for the adoption of a county-wide planning policy((;)). In other counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, this meeting shall be convened no later than sixty days after the date the county adopts its resolution of intention or was certified by the office of financial management.

(b) The process and framework for adoption of a county-wide planning policy specified in (a) of this subsection shall determine the manner in which the county and the cities agree to all procedures and provisions including but not limited to desired planning policies, deadlines, ratification of final agreements and demonstration thereof, and financing, if any, of all activities associated therewith((;)).

(c) If a county fails for any reason to convene a meeting with representatives of cities as required in (a) of this subsection, the governor may immediately impose any appropriate sanction or sanctions on the county from those specified under RCW 36.70A.340((;)).

(d) If there is no agreement by October 1, 1991, in a county that was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 as of June 1, 1991, or if there is no agreement within one hundred twenty days of the date the county adopted its resolution of intention or was certified by the office of financial management in any other county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, the governor shall first inquire of the jurisdictions as to the reason or reasons for failure to reach an agreement. If the governor deems it appropriate, the governor may immediately request the assistance of the department of community development to mediate any disputes that preclude agreement. If mediation is unsuccessful in resolving all disputes that will lead to agreement, the governor may impose appropriate sanctions from those specified under RCW 36.70A.340 on the county, city, or cities for failure to reach an agreement as provided in this section. The governor shall specify the reason or reasons for the imposition of any sanction((; and)).

(e) No later than July 1, 1992, the legislative authority of ((the)) each county that was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 as of June 1, 1991, or no later than fourteen months after the date the county adopted its resolution of intention or was certified by the office of financial management the county legislative authority of any other county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, shall adopt a county-wide planning policy according to the process provided under this section and that is consistent with the agreement pursuant to (b) of this subsection, and after holding a public hearing or hearings on the proposed county-wide planning policy.

(3) A county-wide planning policy shall at a minimum, address the following:

(a) Policies to implement RCW 36.70A.110;

(b) Policies for promotion of contiguous and orderly development and provision of urban services to such development;

(d) Policies for county-wide transportation facilities and strategies;

(e) Policies that consider the need for affordable housing, such as housing for all economic segments of the population and parameters for its distribution;

(f) Policies for joint county and city planning within urban growth areas;

(g) Policies for county-wide economic development and employment; and

(h) An analysis of the fiscal impact.

(4) Federal agencies and Indian tribes may participate in and cooperate with the county-wide planning policy adoption process. Adopted county-wide planning policies shall be adhered to by state agencies.

(5) Failure to adopt a county-wide planning policy that meets the requirements of this section may result in the imposition of a sanction or sanctions on a county or city within the county, as specified in RCW 36.70A.340. In imposing a sanction or sanctions, the governor shall specify the reasons for failure to adopt a county-wide planning policy in order that any imposed sanction or sanctions are fairly and equitably related to the failure to adopt a county-wide planning policy.

(6) Cities and the governor may appeal an adopted county-wide planning policy to the growth planning hearings board within sixty days of the adoption of the county-wide planning policy.

(7) Multicounty planning policies shall be adopted by two or more counties, each with a population of four hundred fifty thousand or more, with contiguous urban areas and may be adopted by other counties, according to the process established under this section or other processes agreed to among the counties and cities within the affected counties throughout the multicounty region.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. A new section is added to chapter 36.70A RCW to read as follows:

The governor may impose a sanction or sanctions specified under RCW 36.70A.340 on: (1) A county or city that fails to designate critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, or mineral resource lands under RCW 36.70A.170 by the date such action was required to have been taken; (2) a county or city that fails to adopt development regulations under RCW 36.70A.060 protecting critical areas or conserving agricultural lands, forest lands, or mineral resource lands by the date such action was required to have been taken; (3) a county that fails to designate urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110 by the date such action was required to have been taken; and (4) a county or city that fails to adopt its comprehensive plan or development regulations when such actions are required to be taken.

Prior to imposing a sanction or sanctions on a county or city, the governor shall make a written finding that the county or city has not proceeded in good faith or has unreasonably delayed taking required action by the date such action was required to have been taken.

Sec. 7. RCW 82.02.050 and 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 s 43 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) It is the intent of the legislature:

(a) To ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new growth and development;

(b) To promote orderly growth and development by establishing standards by which counties, cities, and towns may require, by ordinance, that new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve new growth and development; and

(c) To ensure that impact fees are imposed through established procedures and criteria so that specific developments do not pay arbitrary fees or duplicative fees for the same impact.

(2) Counties, cities, and towns that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 are authorized to impose impact fees on development activity as part of the financing for public facilities, provided that the financing for system improvements to serve new development must provide for a balance between impact fees and other sources of public funds and cannot rely solely on impact fees.

(3) The impact fees:

(a) Shall only be imposed for system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development;

(b) Shall not exceed a proportionate share of the costs of system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development; and

(4) Impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities defined in RCW 82.02.090 which are addressed by a capital facilities plan element of a comprehensive land use plan adopted pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.70A.070 or the provisions for comprehensive plan adoption contained in chapter 36.70, 35.63, or 35A.63 RCW. After ((July 1, 1993)) the date a county, city, or town is required to adopt its comprehensive plan and development regulations under chapter 36.70A RCW, continued authorization to collect and expend impact fees shall be contingent on the county, city, or town adopting or revising a comprehensive plan in compliance with RCW 36.70A.070, and on the capital facilities plan identifying:

(a) Deficiencies in public facilities serving existing development and the means by which existing deficiencies will be eliminated within a reasonable period of time;

(b) Additional demands placed on existing public facilities by new development; and

If the capital facilities plan of the county, city, or town is complete other than for the inclusion of those elements which are the responsibility of a special district, the county, city, or town may impose impact fees to address those public facility needs for which the county, city, or town is responsible.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately."

Representatives H. Myers and Edmondson spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and it was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives H. Myers, Edmondson and Horn spoke in favor of passage of the bill and Representative Forner spoke against the passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1761.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1761 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 95, Nays - 3, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 95.

Voting nay: Representatives Cole, G., Dunshee and Flemming - 3.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1761, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

STATEMENT FOR THE JOURNAL

Please change my vote on Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1761 from "YES" to "NO".

ELMIRA FORNER, 47th District

HOUSE BILL NO. 1897, by Representatives Thibaudeau, Leonard, Brown, Patterson, J. Kohl and L. Johnson

Modifying provisions regarding mental health.

The bill was read the second time. Committee on Human Services recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute. Committee on Appropriations recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute by Committee on Human Services as amended by Committee on Appropriations. (For committee amendments see Journal 57th Day, March 8, 1993.)

On motion of Representative Leonard, Substitute House Bill No. 1897 was substituted for House Bill No. 1897 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1897 was read the second time.

Representative Valle moved adoption of the committee amendments and spoke in favor of them. The committee amendments were adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Thibaudeau and Cooke spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1897.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1897 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 2, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 96.

Voting nay: Representatives Bray and Ludwig - 2.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1897, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1910, by Representatives Silver, Wang, Sommers, Brough, Mielke, Foreman, Dyer, Brumsickle, Long, Edmondson, Horn, Casada, Wood, Flemming, Morton, Miller, Cooke, Forner and Anderson

Creating an inventory system for state-owned or leased facilities.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Wang, Substitute House Bill No. 1910 was substituted for House Bill No. 1910 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1910 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Silver spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1910.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1910 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute House Bill No. 1910, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1943, by Representatives Brumsickle, Jacobsen, Dorn, Quall, Shin, L. Johnson, King and Long

Allowing community and technical college foundations to manage funds for their exceptional faculty awards.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Brumsickle spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1943.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final of House Bill No. 1943 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

House Bill No. 1943, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1957, by Representatives Dellwo, Wolfe, R. Meyers, Pruitt, L. Johnson, J. Kohl, Conway and Karahalios; by request of Insurance Commissioner

Creating the medical health coverage benefit determination committee.

The bill was read the second time. Committee on Health Care recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute. Committee on Appropriations recommendation: Majority, do pass substitute by Committee on Health Care as amended by Committee on Appropriations. (For committee amendments see Journal, 57th Day, March 8, 1993.)

On motion of Representative Dellwo, Substitute House Bill No. 1957 was substituted for House Bill No. 1957 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1957 was read the second time.

Representative Locke moved the committee amendments and spoke in favor of it. The committee amendments was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

With the consent of the House, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Dellwo, Flemming and L. Johnson spoke in favor of passage of the bill and Representative Mielke spoke against it.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1957.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1959 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 88, Nays - 10, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Miller, Morris, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Talcott, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 88.

Voting nay: Representatives Casada, Edmondson, Fuhrman, Lisk, Mielke, Morton, Padden, Sheahan, Stevens and Tate - 10.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1957, having received constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1985, by Representatives Mielke, Zellinsky, Dyer, R. Johnson, Kremen, Anderson, Dorn, Peery, R. Meyers, Kessler, Grant, Reams, Appelwick, Schmidt and Tate

Regulating liquidators' rights to collect premiums.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representative Mielke spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1985.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1985 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

House Bill No. 1985, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved the House consider the following bills in the following order: House Bill No. 1333 and House Bill No. 1259. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1333, by Representatives Flemming, Leonard, Veloria, Chappell, R. Fisher, Dunshee, Linville, Eide, Franklin, Ludwig, Roland, Rayburn, Pruitt, Finkbeiner, Holm, Basich, Lemmon, Johanson, Karahalios, Jones, H. Myers, Morris, L. Johnson, Ogden and J. Kohl

Providing for youth gang violence reduction.

On motion of Representative Wineberry, Substitute House Bill No. 1333 was substituted for House Bill No. 1333 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1333 was read the second time.

Representative Locke moved the committee amendment.

Representative Flemming moved the striking amendment by Representatives Flemming and others:

Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

"NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature finds and declares that:

(1) The number of youth who are members and associates of gangs and commit gang violence has significantly increased throughout the entire greater Puget Sound, Spokane, and other areas of the state;

(2) Youth gang violence has caused a tremendous strain on the progress of the communities impacted. The loss of life, property, and positive opportunity for growth caused by youth gang violence has reached intolerable levels. Increased youth gang activity has seriously strained the budgets of many local jurisdictions, as well as threatened the ability of the educational system to educate our youth;

(3) Among youth gang members the high school drop-out rate is significantly higher than among nongang members. Since the economic future of our state depends on a highly educated and skilled work force, this high school drop-out rate threatens the economic welfare of our future work force, as well as the future economic growth of our state;

(4) The unemployment rate among youth gang members is higher than that among the general youth population. The unusual unemployment rate, lack of education and skills, and the increased criminal activity could significantly impact our future prison population;

(5) Most youth gangs are subcultural. This implies that gangs provide the nurturing, discipline, and guidance to gang youth and potential gang youth that is generally provided by communities and other social systems. The subcultural designation means that youth gang participation and violence can be effectively reduced in Washington communities and schools through the involvement of community, educational, criminal justice, and employment systems working in a unified manner with parents and individuals who have a firsthand knowledge of youth gangs and at-risk youth; and

(6) A strong unified effort among parents and community, educational, criminal justice, and employment systems would facilitate: (a) The learning process; (b) the control and reduction of gang violence; (c) the prevention of youth joining negative gangs; and (d) the intervention into youth gangs.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. It is the intent of the legislature to cause the development of positive prevention and intervention pilot programs for elementary and secondary age youth through cooperation between individual schools, local organizations, and government. It is also the intent of the legislature that if the prevention and intervention pilot programs are determined to be effective in reducing problems associated with youth gang violence, that other counties in the state be eligible to receive special state funding to establish similar positive prevention and intervention programs.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. Unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions shall apply throughout sections 1 through 11 of this act:

(1) "School" means any public school within a school district any portion of which is in a county with a population of over one hundred ninety thousand.

(2) "Community organization" means any organization recognized by a city or county as such, as well as private, nonprofit organizations registered with the secretary of state.

(3) "Gang risk prevention and intervention pilot program" means a community-based positive prevention and intervention program for gang members, potential gang members, at-risk youth, and elementary through high school-aged youth directed at all of the following:

(a) Reducing the probability of youth involvement in gang activities and consequent violence.

(b) Establishing ties, at an early age, between youth and community organizations.

(d) Committing state resources to assist in creating the gang risk prevention and intervention pilot programs.

(4) "Cultural awareness retreat" means a program that temporarily relocates at-risk youth or gang members from their usual social environment to a different social environment, with the specific purpose of having them performing activities which will enhance or increase their positive behavior and potential life successes.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. (1) The department of community development may recommend existing programs or contract with school districts for the development, administration, and implementation in the county of community-based gang risk prevention and intervention pilot programs.

(2) Proposals by the school district for gang risk prevention and intervention pilot program grant funding shall begin with school years no sooner than the 1994-95 session, and last for a duration of two years.

(3) The school district proposal shall include:

(a) A description of the program goals, activities, and curriculum. The description of the program goals shall include a list of measurable objectives for the purpose of evaluation by the school district. To the extent possible, proposals shall contain empirical data on current problems, such as drop-out rates and occurrences of violence on and off campus by school-age individuals.

(b) A description of the individual school or schools and the geographic area to be affected by the program.

(d) A clear description of the experience, expertise, and other qualifications of the community organizations to conduct an effective prevention and intervention program in cooperation with a school or a group of schools.

(e) A proposed budget for expenditure of the grant.

(4) Grants awarded under this section may not be used for the administrative costs of the school district or the individual school.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. (1) A school district in a county with a population of over one hundred ninety thousand may request proposals for establishing gang risk prevention and intervention pilot programs from either public entities that apply jointly with individual schools or community organizations. The proposals shall be reviewed and recommendations for awarding grants shall be made by a committee made up of: (a) A representative from the school district taking the proposal, appointed by the school district's board of directors; (b) a representative appointed by the director of the department of community development or designate; and (c) a representative from the local juvenile court administration.

(2) A school district, upon its election to enter into a contract pursuant to section 4 of this act, shall, no later than March 1, 1994, distribute a standard request for proposals.

(3) Proposals made to the school district must comply with the conditions of the grant.

(4) The school district shall additionally monitor and evaluate the gang risk prevention and intervention pilot programs pursuant to the following criteria:

(a) Success in obtaining stated goals.

(b) Reduction in drop-out rates.

(d) Development of techniques for early identification of at-risk youth.

(5) The school district shall report to the department of community development the results of the program.

(6) Grants awarded under this section may not be used for administrative costs of the school district or the individual school.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. Gang risk prevention and intervention pilot programs shall include, but are not limited to:

(1) Counseling for targeted at-risk students, parents, and families, individually and collectively.

(2) Exposure to positive sports and cultural activities, promoting affiliations between youth and the local community.

(3) Job training, which may include apprentice programs in coordination with local businesses, job skills development at the school, or information about vocational opportunities in the community.

(4) Positive interaction with local law enforcement personnel.

(5) The use of local organizations to provide job search training skills.

(6) Cultural awareness retreats.

(7) The use of specified state resources, as requested.

(8) Full service schools under section 9 of this act.

(9) Community service such as volunteerism and citizenship.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. (1) Upon request from the local community organization receiving an award under section 5 of this act or the granting local school district, or both, the employment security department shall provide a job counselor or counselors to assist at cultural awareness retreats. The counselor shall provide assistance with the following:

(a) Testing for job occupation preferences.

(b) Information on the skills needed for different occupations.

(c) Coordinating the personal appearance of small business owners or corporate managers to explain the type of skills and characteristics businesses currently need in prospective employees, as well as those of prospective future employees.

(d) Establishing a business mentor program between the small business owners or corporate managers and the youth who are willing to participate.

(e) Establishing a specific program that provides help with employment opportunities for youth who attend cultural awareness retreats.

The department may provide other services than those specified.

(2) Upon request from the local community organization awarded the grant, the local school district, or both, the department may provide those services specified in subsection (1) of this section for the youth who are receiving services from the local community organization.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. Upon request from the local community organization receiving an award under section 5 of this act or the granting local school district, or both, the department of labor and industries shall:

(1) Provide information and assistance with regards to the skills and educational backgrounds needed to apply for apprenticeship programs.

(2) Provide direction and assistance with applications for apprenticeship programs.

(3) Explore and examine the feasibility of establishing preapprenticeship programs for those youth who cannot qualify for apprenticeships because of age or educational deficiencies, and are participating or have participated in the retreat.

(4) Provide assistance for and coordination of the personal appearance of representatives of the joint apprenticeship committee with the specific purpose of discussing the skills needed to perform different occupations.

(5) Provide assistance for and coordination of the establishment of a joint apprenticeship mentor program with those youth who are participating or have participated in the retreat program.

The department may provide other services.

Upon request from the local community organization receiving the award under section 5 of this act or the local school district, or both, the department shall provide the services in this section either at the grant-receiving school or at the cultural awareness retreat, or both.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. (1) The purpose of a full service school shall be to increase the interaction between youth and the community at large. A full service school shall provide a wide range of opportunities for all citizens, including goals under RCW 28A.620.010 (1), (2), (3), and (6), and subsection (2) of this section.

(2) The local school district and the local community organization that received a grant under section 5 of this act shall work with other community organizations, the superintendent of public instruction, and school personnel in the selected school to determine the services needed by the community that shall be offered at the full service school.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. (1) Upon request, the division of juvenile rehabilitation shall through cooperation with private business or through interagency agreement with the state parks and recreation commission or department of natural resources, or both, provide facilities for cultural awareness retreats. The requests for facilities must be made by one of the following: (a) The community organization receiving the grant, or (b) the local school district that assisted in awarding the grant. The division may provide other services as requested.

(2) The services may be, but are not limited to, persons knowledgeable of juvenile gang behavior.

(3) Upon receiving a request for cultural awareness retreat facilities, the division shall notify the departments of employment security and labor and industries of the organization requesting the retreat, and the time, place, and date of the retreat.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. Cultural awareness retreats shall include but are not limited to the following programs:

(1) To develop positive attitudes and self-esteem.

(2) To develop youth decision-making ability.

(3) To assist with career development and educational development.

(4) To help develop respect for the community, and ethnic origin.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. Sections 2 through 11 of this act shall constitute a new chapter in Title 43 RCW.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 13. If specific funding for the purposes of this act, referencing this act by bill number, is not provided by June 30, 1993, in the omnibus appropriations act, this act is null and void.

With the consent of the House, Representative Vance withdrew amendment No. 56.

Representative Vance moved the following amendment to the striking amendment by Representative Vance:

On page 11 of the amendment, after line 12, insert " Sec. 14 RCW 9.94A.030 and 1992 c 145 s 6 and 1992 c 75 s 1 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.

(1) "Collect," or any derivative thereof, "collect and remit," or "collect and deliver," when used with reference to the department of corrections, means that the department is responsible for monitoring and enforcing the offender's sentence with regard to the legal financial obligation, receiving payment thereof from the offender, and, consistent with current law, delivering daily the entire payment to the superior court clerk without depositing it in a departmental account.

(2) "Commission" means the sentencing guidelines commission.

(3) "Community corrections officer" means an employee of the department who is responsible for carrying out specific duties in supervision of sentenced offenders and monitoring of sentence conditions.

(4) "Community custody" means that portion of an inmate's sentence of confinement in lieu of earned early release time served in the community subject to controls placed on the inmate's movement and activities by the department of corrections.

(5) "Community placement" means that period during which the offender is subject to the conditions of community custody and/or postrelease supervision, which begins either upon completion of the term of confinement (postrelease supervision) or at such time as the offender is transferred to community custody in lieu of earned early release. Community placement may consist of entirely community custody, entirely postrelease supervision, or a combination of the two.

(6) "Community service" means compulsory service, without compensation, performed for the benefit of the community by the offender.

(7) "Community supervision" means a period of time during which a convicted offender is subject to crime-related prohibitions and other sentence conditions imposed by a court pursuant to this chapter or RCW 46.61.524. For first-time offenders, the supervision may include crime-related prohibitions and other conditions imposed pursuant to RCW 9.94A.120(5). For purposes of the interstate compact for out-of-state supervision of parolees and probationers, RCW 9.95.270, community supervision is the functional equivalent of probation and should be considered the same as probation by other states.

(8) "Confinement" means total or partial confinement as defined in this section.

(9) "Conviction" means an adjudication of guilt pursuant to Titles 10 or 13 RCW and includes a verdict of guilty, a finding of guilty, and acceptance of a plea of guilty.

(10) "Court-ordered legal financial obligation" means a sum of money that is ordered by a superior court of the state of Washington for legal financial obligations which may include restitution to the victim, statutorily imposed crime victims' compensation fees as assessed pursuant to RCW 7.68.035, court costs, county or interlocal drug funds, court-appointed attorneys' fees, and costs of defense, fines, and any other financial obligation that is assessed to the offender as a result of a felony conviction.

(11) "Crime-related prohibition" means an order of a court prohibiting conduct that directly relates to the circumstances of the crime for which the offender has been convicted, and shall not be construed to mean orders directing an offender affirmatively to participate in rehabilitative programs or to otherwise perform affirmative conduct.

(12)(a) "Criminal history" means the list of a defendant's prior convictions, whether in this state, in federal court, or elsewhere. The history shall include, where known, for each conviction (i) whether the defendant has been placed on probation and the length and terms thereof; and (ii) whether the defendant has been incarcerated and the length of incarceration.

(b) "Criminal history" shall always include juvenile convictions for sex offenses and shall also include a defendant's other prior convictions in juvenile court if: (i) The conviction was for an offense which is a felony or a serious traffic offense and is criminal history as defined in RCW 13.40.020(6)(a); (ii) the defendant was fifteen years of age or older at the time the offense was committed; and (iii) with respect to prior juvenile class B and C felonies or serious traffic offenses, the defendant was less than twenty-three years of age at the time the offense for which he or she is being sentenced was committed.

(13) "Criminal street gang" means any ongoing organization, association, or group of three or more persons, whether formal or informal, that has as one of its primary activities the commission of a criminal act or acts.

(14) "Department" means the department of corrections.

(((14))) (15) "Determinate sentence" means a sentence that states with exactitude the number of actual years, months, or days of total confinement, of partial confinement, of community supervision, the number of actual hours or days of community service work, or dollars or terms of a legal financial obligation. The fact that an offender through "earned early release" can reduce the actual period of confinement shall not affect the classification of the sentence as a determinate sentence.

(((15))) (16) "Disposable earnings" means that part of the earnings of an individual remaining after the deduction from those earnings of any amount required by law to be withheld. For the purposes of this definition, "earnings" means compensation paid or payable for personal services, whether denominated as wages, salary, commission, bonuses, or otherwise, and, notwithstanding any other provision of law making the payments exempt from garnishment, attachment, or other process to satisfy a court-ordered legal financial obligation, specifically includes periodic payments pursuant to pension or retirement programs, or insurance policies of any type, but does not include payments made under Title 50 RCW, except as provided in RCW 50.40.020 and 50.40.050, or Title 74 RCW.

(((16))) (17) "Drug offense" means:

(a) Any felony violation of chapter 69.50 RCW except possession of a controlled substance (RCW 69.50.401(d)) or forged prescription for a controlled substance (RCW 69.50.403);

(b) Any offense defined as a felony under federal law that relates to the possession, manufacture, distribution, or transportation of a controlled substance; or

(c) Any out-of-state conviction for an offense that under the laws of this state would be a felony classified as a drug offense under (a) of this subsection.

(((17))) (18) "Escape" means:

(a) Escape in the first degree (RCW 9A.76.110), escape in the second degree (RCW 9A.76.120), willful failure to return from furlough (RCW 72.66.060), willful failure to return from work release (RCW 72.65.070), or willful failure to be available for supervision by the department while in community custody (RCW 72.09.310); or

(b) Any federal or out-of-state conviction for an offense that under the laws of this state would be a felony classified as an escape under (a) of this subsection.

(((18))) (19) "Felony traffic offense" means:

(a) Vehicular homicide (RCW 46.61.520), vehicular assault (RCW 46.61.522), eluding a police officer (RCW 46.61.024), or felony hit-and-run injury-accident (RCW 46.52.020(4)); or

(b) Any federal or out-of-state conviction for an offense that under the laws of this state would be a felony classified as a felony traffic offense under (a) of this subsection.

(((19))) (20) "Fines" means the requirement that the offender pay a specific sum of money over a specific period of time to the court.

(((20))) (21)(a) "First-time offender" means any person who is convicted of a felony (i) not classified as a violent offense or a sex offense under this chapter, or (ii) that is not the manufacture, delivery, or possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance classified in schedule I or II that is a narcotic drug or the selling for profit (([of])) of any controlled substance or counterfeit substance classified in schedule I, RCW 69.50.204, except leaves and flowering tops of marihuana, and except as provided in (b) of this subsection, who previously has never been convicted of a felony in this state, federal court, or another state, and who has never participated in a program of deferred prosecution for a felony offense.

(b) For purposes of (a) of this subsection, a juvenile adjudication for an offense committed before the age of fifteen years is not a previous felony conviction except for adjudications of sex offenses.

(((21))) (22) "Nonviolent offense" means an offense which is not a violent offense.

(((22))) (23) "Offender" means a person who has committed a felony established by state law and is eighteen years of age or older or is less than eighteen years of age but whose case has been transferred by the appropriate juvenile court to a criminal court pursuant to RCW 13.40.110. Throughout this chapter, the terms "offender" and "defendant" are used interchangeably.

(((23))) (24) "Partial confinement" means confinement for no more than one year in a facility or institution operated or utilized under contract by the state or any other unit of government, or, if home detention or work crew has been ordered by the court, in an approved residence, for a substantial portion of each day with the balance of the day spent in the community. Partial confinement includes work release, home detention, work crew, and a combination of work crew and home detention as defined in this section.

(((24))) (25) "Postrelease supervision" is that portion of an offender's community placement that is not community custody.

(((25))) (26) "Restitution" means the requirement that the offender pay a specific sum of money over a specific period of time to the court as payment of damages. The sum may include both public and private costs. The imposition of a restitution order does not preclude civil redress.

(((26))) (27) "Serious traffic offense" means:

(a) Driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug (RCW 46.61.502), actual physical control while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug (RCW 46.61.504), reckless driving (RCW 46.61.500), or hit-and-run an attended vehicle (RCW 46.52.020(5)); or

(b) Any federal, out-of-state, county, or municipal conviction for an offense that under the laws of this state would be classified as a serious traffic offense under (a) of this subsection.

(((27))) (28) "Serious violent offense" is a subcategory of violent offense and means:

(a) Murder in the first degree, homicide by abuse, murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, kidnapping in the first degree, or rape in the first degree, assault of a child in the first degree, or an attempt, criminal solicitation, or criminal conspiracy to commit one of these felonies; or

(b) Any federal or out-of-state conviction for an offense that under the laws of this state would be a felony classified as a serious violent offense under (a) of this subsection.

(((28))) (29) "Sentence range" means the sentencing court's discretionary range in imposing a nonappealable sentence.

(((29))) (30) "Sex offense" means:

(a) A felony that is a violation of chapter 9A.44 RCW or RCW 9A.64.020 or 9.68A.090 or that is, under chapter 9A.28 RCW, a criminal attempt, criminal solicitation, or criminal conspiracy to commit such crimes;

(b) A felony with a finding of sexual motivation under RCW 9.94A.127; or

(c) Any federal or out-of-state conviction for an offense that under the laws of this state would be a felony classified as a sex offense under (a) of this subsection.

(((30))) (31) "Sexual motivation" means that one of the purposes for which the defendant committed the crime was for the purpose of his or her sexual gratification.

(((31))) (32) "Total confinement" means confinement inside the physical boundaries of a facility or institution operated or utilized under contract by the state or any other unit of government for twenty-four hours a day, or pursuant to RCW 72.64.050 and 72.64.060.

(((32))) (33) "Victim" means any person who has sustained emotional, psychological, physical, or financial injury to person or property as a direct result of the crime charged.

(((33))) (34) "Violent offense" means:

(a) Any of the following felonies, as now existing or hereafter amended: Any felony defined under any law as a class A felony or an attempt to commit a class A felony, criminal solicitation of or criminal conspiracy to commit a class A felony, manslaughter in the first degree, manslaughter in the second degree, indecent liberties if committed by forcible compulsion, kidnapping in the second degree, arson in the second degree, assault in the second degree, assault of a child in the second degree, extortion in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, vehicular assault, and vehicular homicide, when proximately caused by the driving of any vehicle by any person while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug as defined by RCW 46.61.502, or by the operation of any vehicle in a reckless manner;

(b) Any conviction for a felony offense in effect at any time prior to July 1, 1976, that is comparable to a felony classified as a violent offense in (a) of this subsection; and

(c) Any federal or out-of-state conviction for an offense that under the laws of this state would be a felony classified as a violent offense under (a) or (b) of this subsection.

(((34))) (35) "Work crew" means a program of partial confinement consisting of civic improvement tasks for the benefit of the community of not less than thirty-five hours per week that complies with RCW 9.94A.135. The civic improvement tasks shall be performed on public property or on private property owned or operated by nonprofit entities, except that, for emergency purposes only, work crews may perform snow removal on any private property. The civic improvement tasks shall have minimal negative impact on existing private industries or the labor force in the county where the service or labor is performed. The civic improvement tasks shall not affect employment opportunities for people with developmental disabilities contracted through sheltered workshops as defined in RCW 82.04.385. Only those offenders sentenced to a facility operated or utilized under contract by a county are eligible to participate on a work crew. Offenders sentenced for a sex offense as defined in subsection (((29))) (30) of this section are not eligible for the work crew program.

(((35))) (36) "Work release" means a program of partial confinement available to offenders who are employed or engaged as a student in a regular course of study at school. Participation in work release shall be conditioned upon the offender attending work or school at regularly defined hours and abiding by the rules of the work release facility.

(((36))) (37) "Home detention" means a program of partial confinement available to offenders wherein the offender is confined in a private residence subject to electronic surveillance. Home detention may not be imposed for offenders convicted of a violent offense, any sex offense, any drug offense, reckless burning in the first or second degree as defined in RCW 9A.48.040 or 9A.48.050, assault in the third degree as defined in RCW 9A.36.031, assault of a child in the third degree, unlawful imprisonment as defined in RCW 9A.40.040, or harassment as defined in RCW 9A.46.020. Home detention may be imposed for offenders convicted of possession of a controlled substance (RCW 69.50.401(d)) or forged prescription for a controlled substance (RCW 69.50.403) if the offender fulfills the participation conditions set forth in this subsection and is monitored for drug use by treatment alternatives to street crime (TASC) or a comparable court or agency-referred program.

(a) Home detention may be imposed for offenders convicted of burglary in the second degree as defined in RCW 9A.52.030 or residential burglary conditioned upon the offender: (i) Successfully completing twenty-one days in a work release program, (ii) having no convictions for burglary in the second degree or residential burglary during the preceding two years and not more than two prior convictions for burglary or residential burglary, (iii) having no convictions for a violent felony offense during the preceding two years and not more than two prior convictions for a violent felony offense, (iv) having no prior charges of escape, and (v) fulfilling the other conditions of the home detention program.

(b) Participation in a home detention program shall be conditioned upon: (i) The offender obtaining or maintaining current employment or attending a regular course of school study at regularly defined hours, or the offender performing parental duties to offspring or minors normally in the custody of the offender, (ii) abiding by the rules of the home detention program, and (iii) compliance with court-ordered legal financial obligations. The home detention program may also be made available to offenders whose charges and convictions do not otherwise disqualify them if medical or health-related conditions, concerns or treatment would be better addressed under the home detention program, or where the health and welfare of the offender, other inmates, or staff would be jeopardized by the offender's incarceration. Participation in the home detention program for medical or health-related reasons is conditioned on the offender abiding by the rules of the home detention program and complying with court-ordered restitution.

Sec. 15. RCW 9.94A.390 and 1990 c 3 s 603 are each amended to read as follows:

If the sentencing court finds that an exceptional sentence outside the standard range should be imposed in accordance with RCW 9.94A.120(2), the sentence is subject to review only as provided for in RCW 9.94A.210(4).

The following are illustrative factors which the court may consider in the exercise of its discretion to impose an exceptional sentence. The following are illustrative only and are not intended to be exclusive reasons for exceptional sentences.

(1) Mitigating Circumstances

(a) To a significant degree, the victim was an initiator, willing participant, aggressor, or provoker of the incident.

(b) Before detection, the defendant compensated, or made a good faith effort to compensate, the victim of the criminal conduct for any damage or injury sustained.

(c) The defendant committed the crime under duress, coercion, threat, or compulsion insufficient to constitute a complete defense but which significantly affected his or her conduct.

(d) The defendant, with no apparent predisposition to do so, was induced by others to participate in the crime.

(e) The defendant's capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law, was significantly impaired (voluntary use of drugs or alcohol is excluded).

(f) The offense was principally accomplished by another person and the defendant manifested extreme caution or sincere concern for the safety or well-being of the victim.

(g) The operation of the multiple offense policy of RCW 9.94A.400 results in a presumptive sentence that is clearly excessive in light of the purpose of this chapter, as expressed in RCW 9.94A.010.

(h) The defendant or the defendant's children suffered a continuing pattern of physical or sexual abuse by the victim of the offense and the offense is a response to that abuse.

(2) Aggravating Circumstances

(a) The defendant's conduct during the commission of the current offense manifested deliberate cruelty to the victim.

(b) The defendant knew or should have known that the victim of the current offense was particularly vulnerable or incapable of resistance due to extreme youth, advanced age, disability, or ill health.

(c) The current offense was a major economic offense or series of offenses, so identified by a consideration of any of the following factors:

(i) The current offense involved multiple victims or multiple incidents per victim;

(ii) The current offense involved attempted or actual monetary loss substantially greater than typical for the offense;

(iii) The current offense involved a high degree of sophistication or planning or occurred over a lengthy period of time;

(iv) The defendant used his or her position of trust, confidence, or fiduciary responsibility to facilitate the commission of the current offense.

(d) The current offense was a major violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, chapter 69.50 RCW (VUCSA), related to trafficking in controlled substances, which was more onerous than the typical offense of its statutory definition: The presence of ANY of the following may identify a current offense as a major VUCSA:

(i) The current offense involved at least three separate transactions in which controlled substances were sold, transferred, or possessed with intent to do so; or

(ii) The current offense involved an attempted or actual sale or transfer of controlled substances in quantities substantially larger than for personal use; or

(iii) The current offense involved the manufacture of controlled substances for use by other parties; or

(iv) The circumstances of the current offense reveal the offender to have occupied a high position in the drug distribution hierarchy; or

(v) The current offense involved a high degree of sophistication or planning or occurred over a lengthy period of time or involved a broad geographic area of disbursement; or

(vi) The offender used his or her position or status to facilitate the commission of the current offense, including positions of trust, confidence or fiduciary responsibility (e.g., pharmacist, physician, or other medical professional)((; or)).

(e) The current offense included a finding of sexual motivation pursuant to RCW 9.94A.127((;)).

(f) The offense was part of an ongoing pattern of sexual abuse of the same victim under the age of eighteen years manifested by multiple incidents over a prolonged period of time((; or)).

(g) The operation of the multiple offense policy of RCW 9.94A.400 results in a presumptive sentence that is clearly too lenient in light of the purpose of this chapter, as expressed in RCW 9.94A.010.

(h) The offense was committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang as defined in RCW 9.94A.030, with the specific intent to promote, further, or assist in any criminal conduct by gang members.

NEW SECTION. Sec. 16. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.

POINT OF ORDER

Representative Wineberry: Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would request a ruling on scope and object regarding amendment No. 126 on Substitute House Bill No. 1333.

With consent of the House, the House deferred consideration of Substitute House Bill No. 1333 and the bill held its place on today's second reading calendar.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1259, by Representatives Locke, Appelwick, J. Kohl, Wang, Reams, Veloria, Johanson, L. Johnson, Flemming and Pruitt

Allowing for the destruction of forfeited firearms.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Appelwick, Substitute House Bill No. 1259 was substituted for House Bill No. 1259 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1259 was read the second time.

Representative Appelwick moved the following amendment by Representative Appelwick:

On page 3, line 12, after "in (b)" strike " and (c)" and insert " , (c), and (d)"

On page 4, line 9, after "(c)" strike "Antique" and insert "Except as provided in (d) of this subsection, antique"

On page 4, after line 13, insert "(d)Firearms in the possession of the Washington state patrol on or after the effective date of this act that are judicially forfeited or forfeited due to a failure to make a claim under RCW 63.32.010, 63.35.020, or 63.40.010, and that are no longer needed for evidence, must be disposed of as follows: (i) Firearms illegal for any person to possess must be destroyed; (ii) The Washington state patrol may retain a maximum of ten percent of legal firearms for agency use: and (iii) All other legal firearms must be auctioned to commercial sellers. The Washington state patrol may retain any proceeds of an auction."

Representative Appelwick spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and the amendment was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Appelwick and Campbell spoke in favor of passage of the bill and Representative Padden spoke against the passage of the bill.

The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1259.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1259 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 71, Nays - 27, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Campbell, Cole, G., Conway, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, Kohl, J., Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Ludwig, Meyers, R., Miller, Morris, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Scott, Sehlin, Sheldon, Shin, Sommers, Springer, Talcott, Thibaudeau, Valle, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 71.

Voting nay: Representatives Ballard, Brumsickle, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cooke, Edmondson, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Horn, King, Kremen, Lisk, Long, Mastin, Mielke, Morton, Padden, Schoesler, Sheahan, Silver, Stevens, Tate, Thomas and Vance - 27.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1259, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved that the House consider House Bill No. 1443 on the second reading calendar. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1443, by Representatives Anderson, Locke, Reams, Wang, Wolfe, Brough, King, Wineberry, Thibaudeau, Ballasiotes, Leonard, Appelwick, Romero, Brown, J. Kohl, Jacobsen, Riley, Ogden, Dellwo, Veloria, G. Cole, L. Johnson and Miller

Expanding the jurisdiction of the human rights commission

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Anderson, Substitute House Bill No. 1443 was substituted for House Bill No. 1443 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1443 was read the second time.

Representative Fuhrman moved the following amendment by Representative Fuhrman and others:

On page 14, after line 6, insert the following:

"NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. This act shall be submitted to the people for their adoption and ratification, or rejection, at the next succeeding general election to be held in this state, in accordance with Article II, section 1 of the state Constitution, as amended, and the laws adopted to facilitate the operation thereof."

Representative Fuhrman spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and Representative Anderson spoke against it.

Representative Vance demanded an electronic roll call and the demand was sustained.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on adoption of the amendment on page 14, after line 6 by Representative Fuhrman to House Bill No. 1443, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 29, Nays - 69, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Ballard, Basich, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Cooke, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Horn, Lisk, Long, Mielke, Morton, Padden, Reams, Schoesler, Sheahan, Shin, Silver, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thomas, Vance, Van Luven and Wood - 29.

Voting nay: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballasiotes, Bray, Brough, Brown, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Locke, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Miller, Morris, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Scott, Sehlin, Sheldon, Sommers, Springer, Thibaudeau, Valle, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 69.

Substitute House Bill No. 1443 was passed to the Committee on Rules for third reading.

MOTION

Representative Peery moved that the House consider House Bill No. 1299 on the second reading calendar. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1299, by Representatives Pruitt, Forner, J. Kohl, Shin, Flemming, Carlson, Peery, Basich, Scott, Cothern, Thibaudeau, Kessler, Holm, Karahalios, Eide, Linville, Johanson, G. Cole, Riley, Van Luven, Jacobsen, Wang, Leonard, Quall, Silver, Brumsickle, Thomas, H. Myers, Rayburn and L. Johnson; by request of Washington State School Directors Association, Board of Education and Superintendent of Public Instruction

Prohibiting firearms and dangerous weapons on school premises, with limited exceptions.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Appelwick, Substitute House Bill No. 1299 was substituted for House Bill No. 1299 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1299 was read the second time.

Representative Pruitt moved adoption of the following amendment by Representative Pruitt:

On page 2, line 23, after "(f)" strike all matter through "(g)" on page 2, line 25

Representative Mastin moved adoption of the following amendment to the amendment:

On page 1, after line 4 of the amendment, insert the following:

"On page 2, line 24, after "student;" strike "or"

On page 2, line 28, after "student" insert "; or

(h) A person who, upon entering school premises, immediately places the firearm or other dangerous weapon in a locked box provided for weapon storage, or who checks the firearm or other dangerous weapon with a school official designated to receive weapons for safekeeping during the owner's visit to the school. Each school shall provide a locked box and key to a weapon owner for weapon storage, or shall designate a school official to receive weapons for safekeeping, during the owner's visit to school premises. A locked box shall be located in the school office or in the reception area. A school official designated to receive weapons shall be located within school premises. The school shall be liable for damage to or loss of a weapon either placed in a locked box or left with a designated school official during the owner's visit to school premises"

Representative Mastin spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment to the amendment, and Representatives Pruitt and Appelwick spoke against it. The amendment to the amendment was not adopted.

Representatives Pruitt, Dorn and Foreman spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment by Representative Pruitt as amended, and the amendment as amended was not adopted.

Representatives Fuhrman, Appelwick, Padden, Chappell and G. Cole spoke against the amendment.

Representative Fuhrman demanded an electronic roll call and the demand was sustained.

The Speaker called upon Representative R. Meyers to preside.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on adoption of the amendment on page 2, line 23, by Representative Pruitt to House Bill No. 1299 and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 19, Nays - 79, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Brown, Cothern, Dorn, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Kohl, J., Locke, Myers, H., Patterson, Pruitt, Rust, Thibaudeau, Valle, Veloria and Wang - 19.

Voting nay: Representatives Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Dellwo, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Ogden, Orr, Padden, Peery, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thomas, Vance, Van Luven, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 79.

Representative Casada moved the following amendment by Representatives Casada and others:

On page 4, after line 36, insert "NEW SECTION. Sec. 7 A new section is added to chapter 9.41 RCW to read as follows:

(1) If a juvenile thirteen years of age or older and under the age of eighteen is found by a court to have committed any offense that is a violation of this chapter, the court shall notify the department of licensing within twenty-four hours after entry of the judgment.

(2) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3) of this section, upon petition of a juvenile whose privilege to drive has been revoked pursuant to RCW 46.20.265, the court may notify the department of licensing that the juvenile's privilege to drive should be reinstated.

(3) If the conviction is for the juvenile's first violation of this chapter or chapter 66.44, 69.41, 69.50, or 69.52 RCW, a juvenile may not petition the court for reinstatement of the juvenile's privilege to drive revoked pursuant to RCW 46.20.265 until the later of ninety days after the date the juvenile turns sixteen or ninety days after the judgment was entered. If the conviction was for the juvenile's second or subsequent violation of this chapter or chapter 66.44, 69.41, 69.50, or 69.52 RCW, the juvenile may not petition the court for reinstatement of the juvenile's privilege to drive revoked pursuant to RCW 46.20.265 until the later of the date the juvenile turns seventeen or one year after the date judgment was entered.

Sec. 8 RCW 13.40.265 and 1989 c 271 s 116 are each amended to read as follows:

(1)(a) If a juvenile thirteen years of age or older is found by juvenile court to have committed an offense that is a violation of chapter 9.41, 66.44, 69.41, 69.50, or 69.52 RCW, the court shall notify the department of licensing within twenty-four hours after entry of the judgment.

(b) Except as otherwise provided in (c) of this subsection, upon petition of a juvenile who has been found by the court to have committed an offense that is a violation of chapter 9.41, 66.44, 69.41, 69.50, or 69.52 RCW, the court may at any time the court deems appropriate notify the department of licensing that the juvenile's driving privileges should be reinstated.

(c) If the offense is the juvenile's first violation of chapter 9.41, 66.44, 69.41, 69.50, or 69.52 RCW, the juvenile may not petition the court for reinstatement of the juvenile's privilege to drive revoked pursuant to RCW 46.20.265 until ninety days after the date the juvenile turns sixteen or ninety days after the judgment was entered, whichever is later. If the offense is the juvenile's second or subsequent violation of chapter 9.41, 66.44, 69.41, 69.50, or 69.52 RCW, the juvenile may not petition the court for reinstatement of the juvenile's privilege to drive revoked pursuant to RCW 46.20.265 until the date the juvenile turns seventeen or one year after the date judgment was entered, whichever is later.

(2)(a) If a juvenile enters into a diversion agreement with a diversion unit pursuant to RCW 13.40.080 concerning an offense that is a violation of chapter 9.41, 66.44, 69.41, 69.50, or 69.52 RCW, the diversion unit shall notify the department of licensing within twenty-four hours after the diversion agreement is signed.

(b) If a diversion unit has notified the department pursuant to (a) of this subsection, the diversion unit shall notify the department of licensing when the juvenile has completed the agreement.

Sec. 9 RCW 46.20.265 and 1991 c 260 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

(1) In addition to any other authority to revoke driving privileges under this chapter, the department shall revoke all driving privileges of a juvenile when the department receives notice from a court pursuant to chapter 9.41 RCW, RCW 13.40.265, 66.44.365, 69.41.065, 69.50.420, 69.52.070, or a substantially similar municipal ordinance adopted by a local legislative authority, or from a diversion unit pursuant to RCW 13.40.265. The revocation shall be imposed without hearing.

(2) The driving privileges of the juvenile revoked under subsection (1) of this section shall be revoked in the following manner:

(a) Upon receipt of the first notice, the department shall impose a revocation for one year, or until the juvenile reaches seventeen years of age, whichever is longer.

(b) Upon receipt of a second or subsequent notice, the department shall impose a revocation for two years or until the juvenile reaches eighteen years of age, whichever is longer.

(3) If the department receives notice from a court that the juvenile's privilege to drive should be reinstated, the department shall immediately reinstate any driving privileges that have been revoked under this section.

(4)(a) If the department receives notice pursuant to RCW 13.40.265(2)(b) from a diversion unit that a juvenile has completed a diversion agreement for which the juvenile's driving privileges were revoked, the department shall reinstate any driving privileges revoked under this section as provided in (b) of this subsection.

(b) If the diversion agreement was for the juvenile's first violation of chapter 9.41, 66.44, 69.41, 69.50, or 69.52 RCW, the department shall not reinstate the juvenile's privilege to drive until the later of ninety days after the date the juvenile turns sixteen or ninety days after the juvenile entered into a diversion agreement for the offense. If the diversion agreement was for the juvenile's second or subsequent violation of chapter 9.41, 66.44, 69.41, 69.50, or 69.52 RCW, the department shall not reinstate the juvenile's privilege to drive until the later of the date the juvenile turns seventeen or one year after the juvenile entered into the second or subsequent diversion agreement.

POINT OF ORDER

Representative Appelwick: Thank you Mr. Speaker: I would request ruling on scope and object regarding the amendment offered by Representative Casada to on Substitute House Bill No. 1299

With the consent of the House, further consideration of Substitute House Bill No. 1299 was deferred.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1833, by Representatives Jacobsen and Appelwick

Conforming statutes relating to firearm handling by minors.

The bill was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Appelwick, Jacobsen and Padden spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1833.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1833 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 97, Nays - 1, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 97.

Voting nay: Representative Cole, G. - 1.

House Bill No. 1833, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1941, by Representatives Cothern, Foreman, L. Johnson, Jones, Vance, Campbell, Pruitt, Shin, Holm, Springer, Brough, Horn, King, J. Kohl, Hansen, Johanson, Miller, Long, Casada, Edmondson, Mielke and Karahalios

Requiring school districts to notify parents of students carrying dangerous weapons at school.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Cothern, Substitute House Bill No. 1941 was substituted for House Bill No. 1941 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1941 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Cothern and Foreman spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1941.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1941 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute House Bill No. 1941, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1976, by Representatives Scott, Riley and Anderson

Requiring firearms dealers to offer trigger-locking devices.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Appelwick, Substitute House Bill No. 1976 was substituted for House Bill No. 1976 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1976 was read the second time.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Scott and Appelwick spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1976.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1976 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 59, Nays - 39, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballasiotes, Bray, Brown, Cole, G., Cothern, Dorn, Eide, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Meyers, R., Miller, Myers, H., Ogden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Scott, Shin, Sommers, Springer, Talcott, Thibaudeau, Valle, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 59.

Voting nay: Representatives Ballard, Basich, Brough, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Conway, Cooke, Dellwo, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Finkbeiner, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Kessler, King, Mastin, Mielke, Morris, Morton, Orr, Padden, Roland, Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Silver, Stevens, Tate, Thomas and Vance - 39.

Substitute House Bill No. 1976, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

STATEMENT FOR THE JOURNAL

Please change my vote on Substitute House Bill No. 1976 from "YEA" to a "NAY."

BARBARA LISK, 15th District

HOUSE BILL NO. 1059, by Representatives Franklin, Scott, Anderson, R. Fisher, Thibaudeau, Ludwig, Pruitt, Jacobsen, Flemming, J. Kohl, Wineberry, Riley, G. Cole, Forner, Appelwick, Johanson, Karahalios and Wang

Regulating possession of weapons in court facilities.

The bill was read the second time. On motion of Representative Appelwick, Substitute House Bill No. 1059 was substituted for House Bill No. 1059 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.

Substitute House Bill No. 1059 was read the second time.

Representative Appelwick moved the following amendment by Representative Appelwick:

On page 2, line 9, after "(1)(b)." make a new paragraph

On page 2, line 9, after "local" strike "court" and insert "legislative authority"

On page 2, line 10, after "box" insert "sufficient in size for short firearms"

On page 2, line 11, after "designate" strike "a court" and insert "an"

On page 2, line 14, after "The" strike "court" and insert "local legislative authority"

On page 2, line 16, after "with" strike "a court" and insert "an"

On page 2, line 18, after "local" strike "court" and insert "legislative authority"

Representative Appelwick spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment and it was adopted.

The bill was ordered engrossed.

On motion of Representative Sheldon, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

Representatives Appelwick and Padden spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1059.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1059 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 2, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 96.

Voting nay: Representatives Fuhrman and Sheldon - 2.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1059, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

March 11, 1993

Mr. Speaker:

The President has signed:

ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO. 1303

and the same is herewith transmitted.

Brad Hendrickson, Deputy Secretary

MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

March 11, 1993

Mr. Speaker:

The Senate has passed:

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5129,

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5131,

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5237,

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5239,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5274,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5278,

ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 5351,

SENATE BILL NO. 5375,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5380,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5492,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5590,

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5615,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5625,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5686,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5751,

SENATE BILL NO. 5757,

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5781,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5802,

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5836,

SENATE BILL NO. 5856,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5878,

SENATE BILL NO. 5883,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE NO. 5909,

SENATE BILL NO. 5943,

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Brad Hendrickson, Deputy Secretary

MOTION

Representative Peery moved that the House immediately consider House Bill No. 1651 on the Suspension Calendar. The motion was carried.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1651, by Representatives Anderson, Reams, Campbell, Valle, King, Pruitt and Jacobsen

Removing the sunset provisions from the naturopathy statutes.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Zellinsky moved that the committee recommendation be adopted and the bill be advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representatives Anderson and Reams spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1651.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1651 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

House Bill No. 1651, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1689, by Representatives Chappell, Springer, Appelwick, Riley, Campbell, Brough, Basich, J. Kohl and Johanson

Making it a misdemeanor to impersonate a law enforcement officer.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Zellinsky moved that the committee recommendation be adopted and the bill be advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representative Chappell spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1689.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1689 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

House Bill No. 1689, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1721, by Representatives R. Meyers, Dorn, Zellinsky, Wang, Reams, G. Fisher, H. Myers and Mielke

Authorizing jointly administered health and welfare benefits trusts for local government employees.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Zellinsky moved that the committee recommendation be adopted and the substitute bill was advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representatives Zellinsky and Mielke spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1721.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1721 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute House Bill No. 1721, having received the majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1728, by Representative Appelwick; by request of Law Revision Commission

Correcting unconstitutional provisions relating to resident employees on public works.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Ludwig moved that the committee recommendation be adopted and the substitute bill was advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representatives Appelwick and Padden spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1728.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1728 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute House Bill No. 1728, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1741, by Representatives Appelwick, Ludwig, Johanson and Orr

Revising penalties for ignoring traffic tickets.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Ludwig moved that the committee recommendation be adopted and the substitute bill be advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representatives Appelwick and Padden spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1741.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1741 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 98, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 98.

Substitute House Bill No. 1741, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO. 1768, by Representatives Appelwick, Padden and Johanson

Creating a courthouse facilitator program.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative G. Fisher moved that the committee recommendation be adopted (For committee amendment see Journal, 57th Day, March 8, 1993.) and the engrossed substitute bill be advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representative Padden spoke against the favor of passage of the bill and Representative G. Fisher spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

POINT OF INQUIRY

Representative G. Fisher yielded to a question by Representative Appelwick.

Representative Appelwick: Representative G. Fisher, in that previous bill was it the intent that those fees could be used for family court services and family reconciliation services within the meaning of family services.

Representative G. Fisher: Representative Appelwick, I think so. This bill, the revenue committee action has returned the bill to its original form which authorizes the county to raise fees locally to help support a courthouse facilitator project, that is being piloted in seven counties at the moment, there are at least 13 that would like to do this but who had no revenue source or other funds to do so. The purpose of this project is to assist pro se litigants in finding their way around the courthouse and the legal maze, not to give them legal advice but to help take the burden off the clerks of courts who are there to file papers not to give people directions and it takes the burden off the courts. This a modest start in that facilitator program and I urge your support.

Representative Appelwick: The answer to the question, given by Representative G. Fisher, I think, is important because family court services which do investigation and counseling and family reconciliation services which try to help those people who want to get back together immediately, are an important component of those support services. I urge your support.

Representative Appelwick spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1768.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1768 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 89, Nays - 9, Absent - 0, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Scott, Sehlin, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 89.

Voting nay: Representatives Casada, Cooke, Finkbeiner, Fuhrman, Mielke, Padden, Schoesler, Sheahan and Vance - 9.

Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1768, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

HOUSE BILL NO. 1769, by Representatives Linville, R. Johnson, Dunshee, Wolfe, Pruitt, Rust, Karahalios, Stevens, Schoesler, Jacobsen, Basich and J. Kohl

Expanding the authority of the interagency committee for outdoor recreation regarding recreational trails.

The bill was read the second time.

Representative Zellinsky moved that the committee recommendation be adopted and the bill was advanced to third reading. The motion was carried.

Representatives Linville and Morton spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 1769.

ROLL CALL

The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 1769 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 97, Nays - 0, Absent - 1, Excused - 0.

Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Chappell, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Fuhrman, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Peery, Pruitt, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Thomas, Valle, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 97.

Absent: Representative Ballasiotes - 1.

House Bill No. 1769, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

STATEMENT FOR THE JOURNAL

Please record my vote as "YES" on House Bill No. 1769.

IDA BALLASIOTES, 41st District

There being no objection, the House advanced to the eleventh order of business.

MOTION

On motion of Representative Peery, the House adjourned until 9:30, Monday March 15, 1993.

BRIAN EBERSOLE, Speaker

ALAN THOMPSON, Chief Clerk