NOTICE: Formatting and page numbering in this document may be different

from that in the original published version.


FIRST SPECIAL SESSION


EIGHTH DAY

__________


MORNING SESSION

__________


House Chamber, Olympia, Monday, May 3, 1993


              The House was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by the Speaker (Representative Karahalios presiding). The Clerk called the roll and a quorum was present.


              The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) assumed the chair.


              The flag was escorted to the rostrum by a Sergeant at Arms Color Guard, Pages Andy Demko and Adam Brickell. Prayer was offered by Representative Cothern.


              Reading of the Journal of the previous day was dispensed with and it was ordered to stand approved.


              There being no objection, the House advanced to the fourth order of business.


INTRODUCTIONS AND FIRST READING

 

ESB 5989            by Senators Hargrove and Rinehart

 

Expanding correctional industries.

 

Heldover from first reading April 30, 1993.


MOTION


              On motion of Representative Sommers, the rules were suspended and Engrossed Senate Bill No. 5989 was advanced to the second reading calendar.


              There being no objection, the House advanced to the eighth order of business.


MOTION


              Representative Sommers moved that the Rules Committee be relieved of House Bill No. 2129 and the bill was placed on the second reading calendar. The motion was carried.


              With the consent of the House, the House reverted to the sixth order of business.


SECOND READING


              The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) declared the House to be at ease.


              The Speaker (Representative Anderson presiding) called the House to order.


MOTION


              On motion of Representative Wineberry, the House recessed until 3:00 p.m.


AFTERNOON SESSION


              The Speaker (Representative R. Meyers presiding) called the House to order at 3:00 p.m..


              The Clerk called the roll and a quorum was present.


              The Speaker assumed the chair.


SENATE AMENDMENTS TO HOUSE BILL


April 30, 1993


Mr. Speaker:

              The Senate has passed ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1761 with the following amendment:


              Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

              "Sec. 1. RCW 36.70A.040 and 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

              (1) Each county that has both a population of fifty thousand or more and has had its population increase by more than ten percent in the previous ten years, and the cities located within such county, and any other county regardless of its population that has had its population increase by more than twenty percent in the previous ten years, and the cities located within such county, shall ((adopt comprehensive land use plans and development regulations under)) conform with all of the requirements of this chapter. However, the county legislative authority of such a county with a population of less than fifty thousand population may adopt a resolution removing the county, and the cities located within the county, from the requirements of adopting comprehensive land use plans and development regulations under this chapter if this resolution is adopted and filed with the department by December 31, 1990, for counties initially meeting this set of criteria, or within sixty days of the date the office of financial management certifies that a county meets this set of criteria under subsection (5) of this section.

              Once a county meets either of these sets of criteria, the requirement to conform with ((RCW 36.70A.040 through 36.70A.160)) all of the requirements of this chapter remains in effect, even if the county no longer meets one of these sets of criteria.

              (2) The county legislative authority of any county that does not meet ((the requirements of)) either of the sets of criteria established under subsection (1) of this section may adopt a resolution indicating its intention to have subsection (1) of this section apply to the county. Each city, located in a county that chooses to plan under this subsection, shall ((adopt a comprehensive land use plan in accordance with)) conform with all of the requirements of this chapter. Once such a resolution has been adopted, the county ((cannot remove itself from)) and the cities located within the county remain subject to all of the requirements of this chapter.

              (3) Any county or city that is initially required to ((adopt a comprehensive land use plan)) conform with all of the requirements of this chapter under subsection (1) of this section shall take actions under this chapter as follows: (a) The county legislative authority shall adopt a county-wide planning policy under RCW 36.70A.210; (b) the county and each city located within the county shall designate critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands, and adopt development regulations conserving these designated agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands and protecting these designated critical areas, under RCW 36.70A.170 and 36.70A.060; (c) the county shall designate and take other actions related to urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110; (d) if the county has a population of fifty thousand or more, the county and each city located within the county shall adopt ((the)) a comprehensive plan under this chapter and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan on or before July 1, ((1993)) 1994, and if the county has a population of less than fifty thousand, the county and each city located within the county shall adopt a comprehensive plan under this chapter and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan by January 1, 1995, but if the governor makes written findings that a county with a population of less than fifty thousand or a city located within such a county is not making reasonable progress toward adopting a comprehensive plan and development regulations the governor may reduce this deadline for such actions to be taken by no more than one hundred eighty days. Any county or city subject to this subsection may obtain an additional six months before it is required to have adopted its development regulations by submitting a letter notifying the department of community development of its need prior to the deadline for adopting both a comprehensive plan and development regulations.

              (4) Any county or city that is required to ((adopt a comprehensive land use plan)) conform with all the requirements of this chapter, as a result of the county legislative authority adopting its resolution of intention under subsection (2) of this section, shall take actions under this chapter as follows: (a) The county legislative authority shall adopt a county-wide planning policy under RCW 36.70A.210; (b) the county and each city that is located within the county shall adopt development regulations conserving agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands it designated under RCW 36.70A.060 within one year of the date the county legislative authority adopts its resolution of intention; (c) the county shall designate and take other actions related to urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110; and (d) the county and each city that is located within the county shall adopt ((the)) a comprehensive plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan not later than ((three)) four years from the date the county legislative ((body takes action as required by subsection (2) of this section)) authority adopts its resolution of intention, but a county or city may obtain an additional six months before it is required to have adopted its development regulations by submitting a letter notifying the department of community development of its need prior to the deadline for adopting both a comprehensive plan and development regulations.

              (((4))) (5) If the office of financial management certifies that the population of a county that previously had not been required to plan under subsection (1) or (2) of this section has changed sufficiently to meet either of the ((requirements of)) sets of criteria specified under subsection (1) of this section, and where applicable, the county legislative authority has not adopted a resolution removing the county from these requirements as provided in subsection (1) of this section, the county and each city within such county shall ((adopt)) take actions under this chapter as follows: (a) The county legislative authority shall adopt a county-wide planning policy under RCW 36.70A.210; (b) the county and each city located within the county shall adopt development regulations under RCW 36.70A.060 conserving agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands it designated within one year of the certification by the office of financial management; (((b))) (c) the county shall designate and take other actions related to urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110; and (d) the county and each city located within the county shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan ((under this chapter)) and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan within ((three)) four years of the certification by the office of financial management((; and (c) development regulations pursuant to this chapter within one year of having adopted its comprehensive land use plan)), but a county or city may obtain an additional six months before it is required to have adopted its development regulations by submitting a letter notifying the department of community development of its need prior to the deadline for adopting both a comprehensive plan and development regulations.

              (6) A copy of each document that is required under this section shall be submitted to the department at the time of its adoption.


              Sec. 2. RCW 36.70A.110 and 1991 sp.s. c 32 s 29 are each amended to read as follows:

              (1) Each county that is required or chooses to ((adopt a comprehensive land use)) plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature. Each city that is located in such a county shall be included within an urban growth area. An urban growth area may include more than a single city. An urban growth area may include territory that is located outside of a city only if such territory already is characterized by urban growth or is adjacent to territory already characterized by urban growth.

              (2) Based upon the population growth management planning population projection made for the county by the office of financial management, the urban growth areas in the county shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is projected to occur in the county for the succeeding twenty-year period. Each urban growth area shall permit urban densities and shall include greenbelt and open space areas. Within one year of July 1, 1990, each county ((required to designate urban growth areas)) that as of June 1, 1991, was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, shall begin consulting with each city located within its boundaries and each city shall propose the location of an urban growth area. Within sixty days of the date the county legislative authority of a county adopts its resolution of intention or of certification by the office of financial management, all other counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall begin this consultation with each city located within its boundaries. The county shall attempt to reach agreement with each city on the location of an urban growth area within which the city is located. If such an agreement is not reached with each city located within the urban growth area, the county shall justify in writing why it so designated the area an urban growth area. A city may object formally with the department over the designation of the urban growth area within which it is located. Where appropriate, the department shall attempt to resolve the conflicts, including the use of mediation services.

              (3) Urban growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both existing public facilities and services and any additional needed public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that urban government services be provided by cities, and urban government services should not be provided in rural areas.

              (4) On or before October 1, 1993, each county that was initially required to plan under RCW 36.70A.040(1) shall adopt development regulations designating interim urban growth areas under this chapter. Within three years and three months of the date the county legislative authority of a county adopts its resolution of intention or of certification by the office of financial management, all other counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall adopt development regulations designating interim urban growth areas under this chapter. Adoption of the interim urban growth areas may only occur after public notice; public hearing; and compliance with the state environmental policy act, chapter 43.21C RCW, and RCW 36.70A.110. Such action may be appealed to the appropriate growth planning hearings board under RCW 36.70A.280. Final urban growth areas shall be adopted at the time of comprehensive plan adoption under this chapter.

              (5) Each county shall include designations of urban growth areas in its comprehensive plan.


              Sec. 3. RCW 36.70A.120 and 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 s 12 are each amended to read as follows:

              ((Within one year of the adoption of its comprehensive plan, each county and city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall enact development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. These counties and cities)) Each county and city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall perform ((their)) its activities and make capital budget decisions in conformity with ((their)) its comprehensive plan((s)).


              Sec. 4. RCW 36.70A.210 and 1991 sp.s. c 32 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

              (1) The legislature recognizes that counties are regional governments within their boundaries, and cities are primary providers of urban governmental services within urban growth areas. For the purposes of this section, a "county-wide planning policy" is a written policy statement or statements used solely for establishing a county-wide framework from which county and city comprehensive plans are developed and adopted pursuant to this chapter. This framework shall ensure that city and county comprehensive plans are consistent as required in RCW 36.70A.100. Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter the land-use powers of cities.

              (2) The legislative authority of a county that plans under RCW 36.70A.040 shall adopt a county-wide planning policy in cooperation with the cities located in whole or in part within the county as follows:

              (a) No later than sixty calendar days from July 16, 1991, the legislative authority of ((the)) each county that as of June 1, 1991, was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall convene a meeting with representatives of each city located within the county for the purpose of establishing a collaborative process that will provide a framework for the adoption of a county-wide planning policy((;)). In other counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, this meeting shall be convened no later than sixty days after the date the county adopts its resolution of intention or was certified by the office of financial management.

              (b) The process and framework for adoption of a county-wide planning policy specified in (a) of this subsection shall determine the manner in which the county and the cities agree to all procedures and provisions including but not limited to desired planning policies, deadlines, ratification of final agreements and demonstration thereof, and financing, if any, of all activities associated therewith((;)).

              (c) If a county fails for any reason to convene a meeting with representatives of cities as required in (a) of this subsection, the governor may immediately impose any appropriate sanction or sanctions on the county from those specified under RCW 36.70A.340((;)).

              (d) If there is no agreement by October 1, 1991, in a county that was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 as of June 1, 1991, or if there is no agreement within one hundred twenty days of the date the county adopted its resolution of intention or was certified by the office of financial management in any other county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, the governor shall first inquire of the jurisdictions as to the reason or reasons for failure to reach an agreement. If the governor deems it appropriate, the governor may immediately request the assistance of the department of community development to mediate any disputes that preclude agreement. If mediation is unsuccessful in resolving all disputes that will lead to agreement, the governor may impose appropriate sanctions from those specified under RCW 36.70A.340 on the county, city, or cities for failure to reach an agreement as provided in this section. The governor shall specify the reason or reasons for the imposition of any sanction((; and)).

              (e) No later than July 1, 1992, the legislative authority of ((the)) each county that was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 as of June 1, 1991, or no later than fourteen months after the date the county adopted its resolution of intention or was certified by the office of financial management the county legislative authority of any other county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, shall adopt a county-wide planning policy according to the process provided under this section and that is consistent with the agreement pursuant to (b) of this subsection, and after holding a public hearing or hearings on the proposed county-wide planning policy.

              (3) A county-wide planning policy shall at a minimum, address the following:

              (a) Policies to implement RCW 36.70A.110;

              (b) Policies for promotion of contiguous and orderly development and provision of urban services to such development;

              (c) Policies for siting public capital facilities of a county-wide or state-wide nature;

              (d) Policies for county-wide transportation facilities and strategies;

              (e) Policies that consider the need for affordable housing, such as housing for all economic segments of the population and parameters for its distribution;

              (f) Policies for joint county and city planning within urban growth areas;

              (g) Policies for county-wide economic development and employment; and

              (h) An analysis of the fiscal impact.

              (4) Federal agencies and Indian tribes may participate in and cooperate with the county-wide planning policy adoption process. Adopted county-wide planning policies shall be adhered to by state agencies.

              (5) Failure to adopt a county-wide planning policy that meets the requirements of this section may result in the imposition of a sanction or sanctions on a county or city within the county, as specified in RCW 36.70A.340. In imposing a sanction or sanctions, the governor shall specify the reasons for failure to adopt a county-wide planning policy in order that any imposed sanction or sanctions are fairly and equitably related to the failure to adopt a county-wide planning policy.

              (6) Cities and the governor may appeal an adopted county-wide planning policy to the growth planning hearings board within sixty days of the adoption of the county-wide planning policy.

              (7) Multicounty planning policies shall be adopted by two or more counties, each with a population of four hundred fifty thousand or more, with contiguous urban areas and may be adopted by other counties, according to the process established under this section or other processes agreed to among the counties and cities within the affected counties throughout the multicounty region.


              NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. A new section is added to chapter 36.70A RCW to read as follows:

              The governor may impose a sanction or sanctions specified under RCW 36.70A.340 on: (1) A county or city that fails to designate critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, or mineral resource lands under RCW 36.70A.170 by the date such action was required to have been taken; (2) a county or city that fails to adopt development regulations under RCW 36.70A.060 protecting critical areas or conserving agricultural lands, forest lands, or mineral resource lands by the date such action was required to have been taken; (3) a county that fails to designate urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110 by the date such action was required to have been taken; and (4) a county or city that fails to adopt its comprehensive plan or development regulations when such actions are required to be taken.

              Imposition of a sanction or sanctions under this section shall be preceded by written findings by the governor, that either the county or city is not proceeding in good faith to meet the requirements of the act; or that the county or city has unreasonably delayed taking the required action. The governor shall consult with and communicate his or her findings to the appropriate growth planning hearings board prior to imposing the sanction or sanctions. For those counties or cities that are not required to plan or have not opted in, the governor in imposing sanctions shall consider the size of the jurisdiction relative to the requirements of this chapter and the degree of technical and financial assistance provided.


              Sec. 6. RCW 82.02.050 and 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 s 43 are each amended to read as follows:

              (1) It is the intent of the legislature:

              (a) To ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new growth and development;

              (b) To promote orderly growth and development by establishing standards by which counties, cities, and towns may require, by ordinance, that new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve new growth and development; and

              (c) To ensure that impact fees are imposed through established procedures and criteria so that specific developments do not pay arbitrary fees or duplicative fees for the same impact.

              (2) Counties, cities, and towns that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 are authorized to impose impact fees on development activity as part of the financing for public facilities, provided that the financing for system improvements to serve new development must provide for a balance between impact fees and other sources of public funds and cannot rely solely on impact fees.

              (3) The impact fees:

              (a) Shall only be imposed for system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development;

              (b) Shall not exceed a proportionate share of the costs of system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development; and

              (c) Shall be used for system improvements that will reasonably benefit the new development.

              (4) Impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities defined in RCW 82.02.090 which are addressed by a capital facilities plan element of a comprehensive land use plan adopted pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.70A.070 or the provisions for comprehensive plan adoption contained in chapter 36.70, 35.63, or 35A.63 RCW. After ((July 1, 1993)) the date a county, city, or town is required to adopt its comprehensive plan and development regulations under chapter 36.70A RCW, continued authorization to collect and expend impact fees shall be contingent on the county, city, or town adopting or revising a comprehensive plan in compliance with RCW 36.70A.070, and on the capital facilities plan identifying:

              (a) Deficiencies in public facilities serving existing development and the means by which existing deficiencies will be eliminated within a reasonable period of time;

              (b) Additional demands placed on existing public facilities by new development; and

              (c) Additional public facility improvements required to serve new development.

              If the capital facilities plan of the county, city, or town is complete other than for the inclusion of those elements which are the responsibility of a special district, the county, city, or town may impose impact fees to address those public facility needs for which the county, city, or town is responsible.


              NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect June 1, 1993.

              On page 1, line 2 of the title, after "years;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 36.70A.040, 36.70A.110, 36.70A.120, 36.70A.210, and 82.02.050; adding a new section to chapter 36.70A RCW; providing an effective date; and declaring an emergency."

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Brad Hendrickson, Deputy Secretary


MOTION


              Representative H. Myers moved that the House do concur in the Senate amendments to Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1761 and pass the bill as amended by the Senate.


              Representatives H. Myers and Edmondson spoke in favor of the motion and it was carried.


              With the consent of the House, further consideration of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1761 was deferred.


              With the consent of the House, the House advance to the sixth order of business.


SECOND READING


              HOUSE BILL NO. 2129, by Representatives Mastin, Finkbeiner, Locke, Patterson, Linville, Foreman, Forner and J. Kohl

 

Allowing state agencies to make purchases based on the lowest cost.


              The bill was read the second time.


              With the consent of the House, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


              The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 2129.


              Representatives Mastin, Locke, Silver, Brough, Padden and Conway spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


POINT OF INQUIRY


              Representative Locke yielded to a question by Representative Brough.


              Representative Brough: Thank you, Representative Locke. This bill has a title of state agency purchasing and in this opening section it talks about the ability to purchase goods and services at the lowest cost. Does this mean we can take our printing to the private market place and have it done cheaply and quickly?


              Representative Locke: If it's consistent with other law, yes.


              Representative Mastin again spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


              On motion of Representative J. Kohl, Representatives Peery, Pruitt, Valle and Chappell were excused.


              On motion of Representative Wood, Representatives Thomas and Fuhrman were excused.


POINT OF INQUIRY


              Representative Sommers yielded to a question by Representative Romero.


              Representative Romero: Is the language in section 2 of the bill intended to overturn or modify the ruling of the Supreme Court in Washington Federation of State Employees vs. Spokane Community College?


              Representative Sommers: No, the language is not intended the affect that decision or any other civil service employee right.


ROLL CALL


              The Clerk called the roll on final passage of House Bill No. 2129 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 92, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 6.

              Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dunshee, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Padden, Patterson, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wang, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 92.

              Excused: Representatives Chappell, Fuhrman, Peery, Pruitt, Thomas and Valle - 6.


              House Bill No. 2129, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


              The Speaker declared the House to be at ease.


              The Speaker called the House to order.


              The House resumed consideration of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1761.


FINAL PASSAGE OF HOUSE BILL AS SENATE AMENDED


              The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1761 as amended by the Senate.


POINT OF INQUIRY


              Representative H. Myers yielded to a question by Representative Edmondson.


              Representative Edmondson: Are the goals of the growth management act that are codified in RCW 36.70A.020 applicable to interim urban growth areas?


              Representative H. Myers: Yes, they are. The goals that codified in RCW 36.70A.020 guide the development and adoption of conferencsive plans and development regulation adopted under the growth management act. These goals are applicable since the counties adopted all the regulations designated urban growth areas.


              Representative Edmondson: Do the amendments to the RCW 36.78.110 alter the planning and zoning powers of the city?


              Representative H. Myers: No, these amendments do not alter the planning and zoning powers of the city.


              Representatives H. Myers and Edmondson spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


              On motion of Representative J. Kohl, Representative Wang was excused.


POINT OF INQUIRY


              Representative H. Myers yielded to a question by Representative R. Fisher.


              Representative R. Fisher: Does the use of the term "interim urban growth area" in section 2 require counties to adopt in growth mark orem.


              Representative H. Myers: No. Interim means temporarily, counties will adopt development regulations designated "interim urban growth areas" and later adopt full urban growth areas as part of the comprehensive plan. As under existing laws county has flexibility to craft its own development regulations. The final urban growth areas that the county adopts could be the same as the interim growth area or could differ from its interim growth areas.


ROLL CALL


              The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1761 as amended by the Senate, and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 89, Nays - 3, Absent - 0, Excused - 6.

              Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Ballard, Ballasiotes, Basich, Bray, Brough, Brown, Brumsickle, Campbell, Carlson, Casada, Chandler, Cole, G., Conway, Cooke, Cothern, Dellwo, Dorn, Dyer, Edmondson, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fisher, G., Fisher, R., Flemming, Foreman, Forner, Grant, Hansen, Heavey, Holm, Horn, Jacobsen, Johanson, Johnson, L., Johnson, R., Jones, Karahalios, Kessler, King, Kohl, J., Kremen, Lemmon, Leonard, Linville, Lisk, Locke, Long, Ludwig, Mastin, Meyers, R., Mielke, Miller, Morris, Morton, Myers, H., Ogden, Orr, Patterson, Quall, Rayburn, Reams, Riley, Roland, Romero, Rust, Schmidt, Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sheldon, Shin, Silver, Sommers, Springer, Stevens, Talcott, Tate, Thibaudeau, Vance, Van Luven, Veloria, Wineberry, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 89.

              Voting nay: Representatives Dunshee, Fuhrman and Padden - 3.

              Excused: Representatives Chappell, Peery, Pruitt, Thomas, Valle and Wang - 6.


              Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1761 as amended by the Senate, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


              There being no objection, the House advanced to the eleventh order of business.


MOTION


              On motion of Representative Sommers, the House adjourned until 10:00 a.m., Tuesday May 4,

1993.


BRIAN EBERSOLE, Speaker

ALAN THOMPSON, Chief Clerk