NOTICE: Formatting and page numbering in this document may be different

from that in the original published version.


THIRTY SEVENTH DAY




MORNING SESSION




House Chamber, Olympia, Tuesday, February 17, 1998


             The House was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by the Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding). The Clerk called the roll and a quorum was present.


             The flag was escorted to the rostrum by a Sergeant at Arms Color Guard, Pages Jil Rene'e Thomas and Janelle Winter. Prayer was offered by Aurelia Jo DeBolt, mother of Representative Richard DeBolt.


             Reading of the Journal of the previous day was dispensed with and it was ordered to stand approved.


             There being no objection, the House advanced to the sixth order of business.


SECOND READING


             HOUSE BILL NO. 3008, by Representatives Cooke, Dickerson, Boldt, Wolfe, McDonald, Tokuda, Ballasiotes, Kastama, Lambert, Dunshee, Carrell, Cody, Talcott, Cole, Johnson, Wood, Carlson, Lantz, Reams, Costa, L. Thomas, Clements, Zellinsky, Alexander, Dyer, D. Schmidt, Radcliff, Conway and Anderson

 

Requiring dependency investigations for infants born drug affected.


             The bill was read the second time. There being no objection, Second Substitute House Bill No. 3008 was substituted for House Bill No. 3008 and the second substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.


             Second Substitute House Bill No. 3008 was read the second time.


             Representative Boldt moved the adoption of amendment (978) by Representative Cooke:


             On page 2, beginning with "chapter" on line 5, strike everything down to and including "shall" on page 2 line 13 and insert "chapters 18.71 or 18.57 RCW primarily responsible for the care of a new born infant, an advanced registered nurse who practices midwifery licensed under chapter 18.79 RCW, or a midwife licensed under chapter 18.50 RCW, who has reasonable cause to believe an infant has been exposed to nonprescription use of controlled substances or alcohol must notify the department of the name and address of the parent or parents of an infant who is drug-affected.

             (2) The physician or midwife responsible for the delivery of the infant must"


             Representatives Boldt and Dickerson spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


             The amendment was adopted. The bill was ordered engrossed.


             There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


             Representatives Cooke, Dickerson and Boldt spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


MOTION


             On motion of Representative Talcott, Representative Van Luven was excused. On motion of Representative Kessler, Representatives Kenney, Quall and Sullivan was excused.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 3008.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 3008 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 94, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 4.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Anderson, Appelwick, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Butler, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Chopp, Clements, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooke, Cooper, Costa, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Lantz, Linville, Lisk, Mason, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Morris, Mulliken, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Parlette, Pennington, Poulsen, Radcliff, Reams, Regala, Robertson, Romero, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Skinner, Smith, Sommers, D., Sommers, H., Sterk, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Tokuda, Veloria, Wensman, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 94.

             Excused: Representatives Kenney, Quall, Sullivan and Van Luven - 4.


             Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 3008, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


             There being no objection, the House advanced to the seventh order of business.


THIRD READING


             HOUSE BILL NO. 3031, by Representatives McMorris, Boldt, Chandler and Clements


             Defining misconduct for unemployment insurance purposes.


             Representatives McMorris, Robertson, Clements, Dyer, Robertson (again), Buck and Honeyford spoke in favor of the passage of the bill.


             Representative Wood, Hatfield, Cody, Constantine, Dunshee, Conway and Cooper spoke against the passage of the bill.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 3031.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of House Bill No. 3031 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 55, Nays - 41, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Clements, Cooke, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dunn, Dyer, Hankins, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Koster, Lambert, Lisk, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Mulliken, Parlette, Pennington, Radcliff, Reams, Robertson, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Skinner, Sommers, D., Sterk, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Wensman, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 55.

             Voting nay: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Butler, Chopp, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooper, Costa, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hatfield, Kastama, Keiser, Kessler, Lantz, Linville, Mason, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Poulsen, Quall, Regala, Romero, Scott, Smith, Sommers, H., Sullivan, Tokuda, Veloria, Wolfe and Wood - 41.

             Excused: Representatives Kenney and Van Luven - 2.


             House Bill No. 3031, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


             There being no objection, the House reverted to the sixth order of business.


SECOND READING


             HOUSE BILL NO. 3106, by Representative Chandler

 

Clarifying when a group of wells drilled by the same person or group should be considered a single ground water withdrawal.


             The bill was read the second time.


             With the consent of the House, amendment number 930 to House Bill No. 3106 was withdrawn.


             Representative Hatfield moved the adoption of amendment (983):


             On page 2, line 6, after "affirm" strike all material through "it" on line 7 and insert "that the opinion of the attorney general contained in AGO 1997 No. 6 is a correct interpretation of RCW 90.44.050 as currently enacted and to amend RCW 90.44.050 to exempt from the permitting requirement a group of wells drilled by the same person or group at or about the same time in the same area for the same purpose or project"


             On page 2, line 35, strike "constitutes" and insert "does not constitute"


             On page 2, line 36, strike "not"


             Representatives Hatfield, Linville, Doumit and Linville again spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


             Representatives Chandler spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


             Representative Hatfield demanded an electronic roll call and the demand was sustained.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of amendment number 983 to House Bill No. 3106.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of the amendment number 983 to House Bill No. 3106, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 21, Nays - 75, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

             Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Butler, Chopp, Conway, Cooper, Costa, Doumit, Eickmeyer, Gombosky, Hatfield, Lantz, Mason, O'Brien, Ogden, Poulsen, Quall, Scott, Sommers, H., Sullivan, Tokuda and Veloria - 21.

             Voting nay: Representatives Alexander, Appelwick, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Clements, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Cooke, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dickerson, Dunn, Dunshee, Dyer, Fisher, Gardner, Grant, Hankins, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Linville, Lisk, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Morris, Mulliken, Murray, Parlette, Pennington, Radcliff, Reams, Regala, Robertson, Romero, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Skinner, Smith, Sommers, D., Sterk, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Wensman, Wolfe, Wood, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 75.

             Excused: Representatives Kenney and Van Luven - 2.


             There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


             Representatives Linville, Romero and Linville again spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


             Representatives Chandler and Hatfield spoke against passage of the bill.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 3106.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of House Bill No. 3106 and the bill was not passed by the House by the following vote: Yeas - 31, Nays - 66, Absent - 0, Excused - 1.

             Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Butler, Chopp, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Cooper, Costa, Dickerson, Dunshee, Fisher, Gardner, Kastama, Keiser, Lantz, Linville, Mason, Morris, Murray, Ogden, Poulsen, Quall, Regala, Romero, Scott, Sommers, H., Tokuda, Veloria, Wolfe and Wood - 31.

             Voting nay: Representatives Alexander, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Clements, Conway, Cooke, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Doumit, Dunn, Dyer, Eickmeyer, Gombosky, Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Lisk, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Mulliken, O'Brien, Parlette, Pennington, Radcliff, Reams, Robertson, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Skinner, Smith, Sommers, D., Sterk, Sullivan, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Van Luven, Wensman, Zellinsky and Mr. Speaker - 66.

             Excused: Representative Kenney - 1.


             House Bill No. 3106, having failed to received the constitutional majority, was declared lost.


             HOUSE BILL NO. 2830, by Representatives Reams, Romero and Lantz; by request of Land Use Study Commission

 

Implementing recommendations of the land use study commission.


             The bill was read the second time. There being no objection, Substitute House Bill No. 2830 was substituted for House Bill No. 2830 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.


             Substitute House Bill No. 2830 was read the second time.


             With the consent of the House, amendment number 936 to Substitute House Bill No. 2830 was withdrawn.


             Representative Cairnes moved the adoption of amendment (1000):


             On page 3, beginning on line 18, strike all of section 4


             Renumber the sections consecutively and correct the title and any internal references accordingly.


             Representatives Cairnes, Thompson and Reams spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


             Representative Romero spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


             The amendment was adopted. The bill was ordered engrossed.


             There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


             Representatives Reams, Romero and Lantz spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


MOTION


             On motion of Representative Cairnes, Representative Zellinsky and Skinner were excused.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2830.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2830 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Anderson, Appelwick, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Butler, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Chopp, Clements, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooke, Cooper, Costa, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kenney, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Lantz, Linville, Lisk, Mason, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Morris, Mulliken, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Parlette, Pennington, Poulsen, Quall, Radcliff, Reams, Regala, Robertson, Romero, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Smith, Sommers, D., Sommers, H., Sterk, Sullivan, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Tokuda, Van Luven, Veloria, Wensman, Wolfe, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 96.

             Excused: Representatives Skinner and Zellinsky - 2.


             Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2830, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


             HOUSE BILL NO. 2748, by Representatives Mulliken, Thompson, Cairnes, Lantz, DeBolt, McMorris, Sherstad, Koster, Mielke, Sump, Bush, Johnson, Zellinsky, Boldt, Sheahan, Honeyford, Pennington, Schoesler, Chandler and Dunn

 

Allowing rural counties to authorize additional industrial development in rural areas.


             The bill was read the second time.


             Representative Morris moved the adoption of amendment (937):


             On page 2, after line 2, insert the following:


             "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 82.04 RCW to read as follows:

             (1) The definitions in this subsection apply to this section, sections 3 and 4 of this act, RCW 82.62.030, and sections 9 through 16 of this act, unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

             (a) "Business" means the person applying for the tax deferral, credit, or exemption.

             (b) "Construction" means the construction of a manufacturing operation complex and includes labor and services rendered in respect to construction. "Construction" ends when a project is completed as determined under subsection (2)(c) of this section.

             (c) "Distressed county" means a county in which the average level of unemployment for the three years before the year in which an application is filed under this chapter exceeds the average state unemployment for those years by twenty percent.

             (d) "Employment position" means a position in which a permanent full-time employee is employed in a project during the entire tax year. "The entire tax year" means the full-time position is filled for a period of twelve consecutive months. "Full-time" means at least thirty-five hours a week.

             (e) "Equipping and operating" means the acquisition of tangible personal property for use at the manufacturing operation complex, and includes labor and services rendered in respect to the installation of tangible personal property.

             (f) "Finished product" means an article, substance, or commodity that is manufactured at and shipped from the manufacturing operation complex.

             (g) "Manufacturing operation complex" means the buildings, structures, and improvements located at the site where the manufacturing activity occurs. The complex includes the buildings, structures, and improvements used to receive, store, and ship raw materials and finished products as well as buildings, structures, and improvements used for the manufacturing production line. In addition, the term includes all administrative offices, employee support facilities, and production support facilities located at the site. The manufacturing operation complex does not include buildings, structures, and improvements located off of the site.

             (h) "Person" has the meaning given in RCW 82.04.030.

             (i) "Project" means the site preparation, construction, and equipping and operating of a manufacturing operation complex.

             (j) "Raw material" means the ingredients, components, substances, articles, or other tangible personal property that is received at the manufacturing operation complex for use as ingredients or components of the finished product.

             (k) "Site" means a discrete geographical location.

             (l) "Site preparation" means demolition of existing improvements, environmental remediation, earth moving, land clearing, site excavation, and shoring, and includes labor and services rendered in respect to site preparation.

             (2) As a condition to receiving initial approval and as a condition of continuing eligibility, the following criteria must be met:

             (a) The project must be located in a distressed county and must be owned and operated by a person who meets the definition of "manufacturer" as defined in RCW 82.04.110;

             (b) The business must commit to an investment, by the time of completion of the project, in land, structures, and equipment, the value of which must be at least four percent of the total of the equalized assessed value in the county in which the project is located. The total equalized assessed value in the county is as published annually by the department in accordance with RCW 84.48.080. Continuing eligibility is conditioned on this investment having actually occurred;

             (c)(i) The business must commit to and must create a minimum of twenty new employment positions at the project within two years of completion of the project.

             (ii) The business must commit to and create one new employment position for each two million dollars invested in the project within two years of completion of the project. The twenty minimum positions in (c)(i) of this subsection are part of and not in addition to the positions required to meet the investment to job ratio.

             (iii) The individuals in the new employment positions must be the employees of the business and must not have been relocated from other locations of the business within this state. Completion of the project is deemed to have occurred when the project is capable of operating and producing finished products. The department of community, trade, and economic development shall determine when the project is complete;

             (d) The business must commit to and must pay an average wage of at least one hundred fifty percent of the average wage in the county. The employment security department shall determine the average wage in the county and shall report this amount to the department of community, trade, and economic development; and

             (e) The business must remain operational for a fifteen-year period after the project is completed. "Operational" means that the level of employment at the manufacturing operation complex must not drop below the total employment positions required under (c) of this subsection.

             (3)(a) The department of community, trade, and economic development shall determine the eligibility of a business and certify eligibility to the department of revenue.

             (b) Approval of the project by a public vote of the governing body of the county or city in which the project is located is a precondition to deferral certification by the department of revenue. If the county or city approves the project, the county or city shall send a written notification of the approval to the department of revenue. If the project is in two jurisdictions, both jurisdictions must approve the project.

             (c) When both of the notices under (a) and (b) of this subsection are received, the department of revenue shall issue a sales and use tax deferral certificate for use under sections 3 and 4 of this act.

             (4) In addition to the initial certification under subsection (3) of this section, the project must be reviewed by the department of community, trade, and economic development each year for continuing eligibility. The business shall provide an annual report to the department of community, trade, and economic development, in a form as required by the department, of its status relative to the eligibility criteria under subsection (2) of this section. The department of community, trade, and economic development shall review the annual report and determine whether the project continues to meet the eligibility criteria. The department of community, trade, and economic development shall provide a written notice of this determination to the business and to the department of revenue. Annual reapproval by the county or city in which the project is located is not required. If the project fails to meet the eligibility criteria the amount of taxes deferred under sections 3 and 4 of this act are immediately due.

             (5) Taxes deferred under sections 3 and 4 of this act need not be repaid if the project maintains its eligibility criteria for a fifteen-year period. The fifteen-year period begins when the deferral certificate is sent under subsection (3)(c) of this section by the department of revenue to the business.

             (6) Application for the deferral under sections 3 and 4 of this act may not be accepted before the effective date of this section or after June 30, 2003.

             (7) The employment security department shall provide such data to the department of revenue and the department of community, trade, and economic development as is necessary to administer this section wage data shall be updated annually to reflect current state and county conditions.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 82.08 RCW to read as follows:

             (1) A person that has received a certification from the department under section 2(3)(c) of this act may use that certificate for deferral of the state share of taxes due under this chapter on the site preparation, construction, and equipping and operating of the project.

             (2) The certificate is not valid for sales that occurred before certification by the department. After the project is determined to be complete under section 2(2)(c) of this act, the certificate is limited to taxes related to equipping and operating of the project.

             (3)(a) The certificate may be used for fifteen years after its issuance.

             (b) The deferral under this section is conditioned on the business remaining eligible under section 2 of this act. If the project fails to meet the eligibility criteria, the amount of taxes deferred under this section are immediately due. The department shall assess interest at the rate provided for delinquent excise taxes, but not penalties, retroactively to the date of deferral.

             (4) The buyer must keep such records as the department requires for audit and verification purposes.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 82.12 RCW to read as follows:

             (1) A person that has received a certification from the department under section 2(3)(c) of this act may use that certificate for deferral of the state share of taxes due under this chapter on the site preparation, construction, and equipping and operating of the project.

             (2) The certificate is not valid for tax due on use that occurred before certification by the department. After the project is determined to be complete under section 2(2)(c) of this act, the certificate is limited to tax due on use of tangible personal property related to equipping and operating of the project.

             (3)(a) The certificate may be used for fifteen years after its issuance.

             (b) The deferral under this section is conditioned on the business remaining eligible under section 2 of this act. If the project fails to meet the eligibility criteria, the amount of taxes deferred under this section are immediately due. The department shall assess interest at the rate provided for delinquent excise taxes, but not penalties, retroactively to the date of deferral.

             (4) The buyer must keep such records as the department requires for audit and verification purposes.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. A new section is added to chapter 82.14 RCW to read as follows:

             The deferral under sections 3 and 4 of this act is for the state portion of the sales and use tax and does not extend to the tax imposed in this chapter.


             Sec. 5. RCW 81.104.170 and 1997 c 450 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

             Cities that operate transit systems, county transportation authorities, metropolitan municipal corporations, public transportation benefit areas, and regional transit authorities may submit an authorizing proposition to the voters and if approved by a majority of persons voting, fix and impose a sales and use tax in accordance with the terms of this chapter, solely for the purpose of providing high capacity transportation service.

             The tax authorized pursuant to this section shall be in addition to the tax authorized by RCW 82.14.030 and shall be collected from those persons who are taxable by the state pursuant to chapters 82.08 and 82.12 RCW upon the occurrence of any taxable event within the taxing district. The maximum rate of such tax shall be approved by the voters and shall not exceed one percent of the selling price (in the case of a sales tax) or value of the article used (in the case of a use tax). The maximum rate of such tax that may be imposed shall not exceed nine-tenths of one percent in any county that imposes a tax under RCW 82.14.340, or within a regional transit authority if any county within the authority imposes a tax under RCW 82.14.340. The exemptions in RCW 82.08.820 and 82.12.820 are for the state portion of the sales and use tax and do not extend to the tax authorized in this section.

             The deferral in sections 3 and 4 of this act is for the state portion of the sales tax and does not extend to the tax imposed in this chapter.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. A new section is added to chapter 82.32 RCW to read as follows:

             The department of revenue may develop and institute a tax reporting method whereby the taxpayer uses deductions, credits, or other accounting techniques, as directed by the department, to allow the department to administer, and the taxpayer to report, the deferral in sections 3 and 4 of this act simply and efficiently. Taxpayers who are entitled to this deferral and sellers who receive deferral certificates from buyers shall keep their records in a form and manner as directed by the department so that the department can distinguish between taxable and exempt transactions.


             Sec. 7. RCW 82.62.030 and 1997 c 366 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) A person shall be allowed a credit against the tax due under chapter 82.04 RCW as provided in this section. For an application approved before January 1, 1996, the credit shall equal one thousand dollars for each qualified employment position directly created in an eligible business project. For an application approved on or after January 1, 1996, the credit shall equal two thousand dollars for each qualified employment position directly created in an eligible business project. For an application approved on or after July 1, 1997, the credit shall equal four thousand dollars for each qualified employment position with wages and benefits greater than forty thousand dollars annually that is directly created in an eligible business. For an application approved on or after July 1, 1997, the credit shall equal two thousand dollars for each qualified employment position with wages and benefits less than or equal to forty thousand dollars annually that is directly created in an eligible business.

             (2) The department shall keep a running total of all credits granted under this chapter during each fiscal year. The department shall not allow any credits which would cause the tabulation to exceed five million five hundred thousand dollars in fiscal year 1998 or 1999 or seven million five hundred thousand dollars in any fiscal year thereafter. If all or part of an application for credit is disallowed under this subsection, the disallowed portion shall be carried over for approval the next fiscal year. However, the applicant's carryover into the next fiscal year is only permitted if the tabulation for the next fiscal year does not exceed the cap for that fiscal year as of the date on which the department has disallowed the application.

             (3) No recipient may use the tax credits to decertify a union or to displace existing jobs in any community in the state.

             (4) No recipient may receive a tax credit on taxes which have not been paid during the taxable year.

             (5) A business that has received certification from the department of revenue under section 2 of this act is eligible for an annual credit of four thousand dollars for each of the positions used to establish project eligibility. Positions created in excess of those required to maintain eligibility are also eligible for the credit under this subsection. The business may apply for the credit once the project is complete, as determined in section 2 of this act. The business may apply each of the successive seven years following its initial application under this subsection and shall receive the credit if the continuing employment requirements of section 2 of this act are met. The credits granted under this subsection do not affect the caps under subsection (2) of this section and the fifteen percent requirement under RCW 82.62.010. Application for the credit under this subsection may not be accepted before the effective date of this section.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. (1) All real and personal property belonging to a business and used in connection with a project that qualifies under this chapter is exempt from ad valorem property taxation for fifteen successive years from completion of construction and certification of the project, as determined under section 2 of this act.

             (2) The exemption does not include real or personal property acquired or constructed prior to the approval of the application prescribed in this chapter. The exemption provided by this chapter is in addition to any other incentives, tax credits, or grants provided by law.

             (3) The definitions in section 2 of this act apply to this chapter, where applicable.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. A person making application for exemption under this chapter must meet the requirements of section 2 of this act and must enter into a contract approved by the department and the governing body or bodies of the city or county in which the project is located. In the contract the applicant must agree to the requirements of section 2 of this act and this chapter. The department of revenue may not accept any application for exemption under this chapter after June 30, 2003.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. An applicant seeking a tax exemption under this chapter must complete the following procedures:

             (1) The applicant shall apply to the department on forms prepared by the department. The application for exemption must contain the following:

             (a) A description of the manner in which the applicant intends to proceed with acquisition and construction of the project, together with proposed time frames for accomplishing the requirements of section 2 of this act and this chapter; and

             (b) A statement that the applicant is aware of the potential tax liability that will be imposed if the property ceases to be eligible for the exemption provided under this chapter.

             (2) The applicant must verify the application for exemption by oath or affirmation.

             (3) The department may permit the applicant to revise an application for exemption before final action on the application is taken by the department.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. The department may approve the application for exemption filed under this chapter if it finds that:

             (1) The proposed project is or will be, at the time of completion, in conformance with all applicable local government regulations in effect at the time the application for exemption is approved;

             (2) The applicant has complied with all requirements under this chapter;

             (3) The site of the project is located in a distressed county, as defined by section 2 of this act; and

             (4) The governing body of the county or city in which the project is located has by a public vote approved the project and has sent a written notification of the approval to the department.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. (1) The department shall approve or deny an application for exemption filed under this chapter within sixty days after it is received, unless in the discretion of the department additional time is necessary in order to make a decision.

             (2) If the application for exemption is approved, the department shall issue the applicant a conditional certificate of tax exemption. The certificate must contain a statement by a duly authorized administrative official of the department that the applicant has complied with the requirements of this chapter.

             (3) If the application for exemption is denied by the department, the deciding administrative official shall state in writing the reasons for the denial and mail the notice to the applicant at the applicant's last known address within ten days of the denial.

             (4) Upon receiving a denial of the application for a property tax exemption under this chapter, the applicant may appeal the denial to the board of tax appeals in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure of the board. This appeal must be submitted within thirty days of the date the notice is received. If the exemption is denied, the sixty-day time period for approving the application for exemption regarding the project must be extended to the extent necessary to accommodate the appeal process.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 13. (1) Upon completion of construction of a project for which an application for exemption under this chapter has been approved, the owner of the eligible business shall file with the department the following:

             (a) A statement of the amount of expenditures for land, structures, machinery, and equipment made with respect to the project;

             (b) A description of the work that has been completed and a statement that the owner's property qualifies the property for exemption under this chapter; and

             (c) A statement that the work has been completed within two years of the issuance of the conditional certificate of tax exemption.

             (2) Within thirty days of the date the statements required under subsection (1) of this section are received, the authorized representative of the department shall determine whether the work completed is consistent with the application for exemption and the contract approved by the legislative authority of the local taxing districts and is qualified for exemption under this chapter. The department shall also determine which completed improvements specifically meet the requirements and required findings.

             (3) The department shall file the certificate of tax exemption with the county assessor within ten days of approval if:

             (a) The construction is completed within two years of the date the conditional certificate of tax exemption was issued or within an authorized extension of this time limit; and

             (b) The authorized representative of the department determines that improvements were constructed consistent with the application for exemption and other applicable requirements and the applicant's property is qualified for exemption under this chapter.

             (4) The authorized representative of the department shall notify the applicant that a certificate of tax exemption will not be issued if the representative determines that:

             (a) The construction was not completed within two years of the approval date or within any authorized extension of the time limit;

             (b) The improvements were not constructed consistent with the application for exemption or other applicable requirements; or

             (c) The applicant's property is otherwise not qualified for exemption under this chapter.

             (5) If the authorized representative of the department finds that the project was not completed within the required time period is due to circumstances beyond the control of the applicant and that the applicant has been acting and could reasonably be expected to act in good faith and with due diligence, the department may extend the deadline for completion of the project for a period not to exceed twenty-four consecutive months.

             (6) The decision by the deciding officer that an owner of an eligible business is not entitled to a certificate of tax exemption may be appealed to the board of tax appeals in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure of the board.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 14. (1) Within thirty days of the anniversary of the date the certificate of tax exemption was issued and each year thereafter for a period of fifteen years, the owner of the eligible business shall file with a designated representative of the department of community, trade, and economic development an annual report indicating the following:

             (a) A certification by the owner that the use of the property has not changed since the date the certificate was approved by the department; and

             (b) A description of changes or improvements made after the certificate of tax exemption was issued.

             (2) The department of community, trade, and economic development shall annually determine whether the business meets the requirements of this chapter and shall annually report this determination to the department of revenue.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 15. (1) Land, structures, and machinery and equipment that have been exempted under this chapter shall continue to be exempt if not converted to another use for at least fifteen years from the date of issuance of the certificate of tax exemption. If the owner intends to convert the development to another use, the owner must notify the assessor within sixty days of the change in use. If, after a certificate of tax exemption has been filed with the county assessor, the assessor discovers that the use of a portion of the property has changed or will be changed to a use that no longer meets the requirements as previously approved or agreed upon by contract between the department and the owner and that the eligible business no longer qualifies for the exemption, the tax exemption must be canceled and the following must occur:

             (a) Additional property tax must be imposed upon the property in the amount that would normally be imposed, plus a penalty amounting to twenty percent of the additional tax. This additional tax is calculated based upon the difference between the property tax paid and the amount of property tax otherwise due and payable had the property not been granted an exemption. The tax, together with penalty and interest, is due in accordance with RCW 84.56.020 the year following the year the property no longer qualifies for exemption;

             (b) The tax must include interest upon the amount of additional tax at the same statutory rate charged on delinquent property taxes from the dates on which the additional tax could have been paid without penalty if the property had been assessed at a value without regard to this chapter; and

             (c) An additional tax unpaid on its due date is delinquent. From the date of delinquency until the additional tax and penalty are paid, interest must be charged at the same rate applied by law to delinquent ad valorem property taxes. The additional tax owed together with interest and penalty become a lien on the land and attach at the time the property or portion of the property no longer meets applicable requirement. The lien has priority to and must be fully paid and satisfied before a recognizance, mortgage, judgment, debt, obligation, or responsibility to or with which the land may become charged or liable. The lien may be foreclosed upon expiration of the same period after delinquency and in the same manner provided by law for foreclosure of liens for delinquent real or personal property taxes.

             (2) When a determination has been made that a tax exemption is to be canceled for a reason stated in this section, the department shall notify the owner of the property, shown by the tax rolls, by mail that the exemption will be canceled. Upon receiving the notice that the exemption is to be canceled, the owner may appeal the cancellation to the board of tax appeals in accordance with the rules of practice and procedures of the board. This appeal must be submitted within thirty days of the date the notice of cancellation is received and must specify the factual and legal basis on which the determination of cancellation is alleged to be erroneous.

             (3) Upon receiving notice from the department or its authorized representative that an exemption has been canceled, the county officials having possession of the assessment and tax rolls shall correct the rolls and collect additional taxes, interest, and penalty in accordance with this section.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 16. A new section is added to chapter 82.04 RCW to read as follows:

             (1) As used in this section:

             (a) "Board" means the community economic revitalization board under chapter 43.160 RCW;

             (b) "Private-sector business" or "business" means "person" as defined in RCW 82.04.030. "Private-sector business" does not include a public agency. "Public agency" means the state or its agencies, instrumentalities, or political subdivisions, or the United States or any instrumentality thereof, or an Indian tribe or nation; and

             (c) "Public facilities" means bridges, roads, domestic and industrial water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, railroad, electricity, natural gas, buildings or structures, and port facilities, in the state of Washington.

             (2) A person shall be allowed a credit against tax due under this chapter or chapter 82.16 RCW as provided in this section. The credit shall equal fifty cents for each dollar of private funds spent on qualifying public facilities. A person may not receive credit for funds spent by another person. Eligible spending is limited to construction, reconstruction, or improvement of the public facility, and includes rights of way and real property acquisition, engineering and design work, environmental assessment and mitigation, and materials acquisition.

             (3) The department, subject to the limitations of subsection (4) of this section, shall approve applications for tax credits upon occurrence of the following:

             (a) A written certification is submitted by the board to the department, stating the applicant has been approved for a loan or grant under chapter 43.160 RCW. The tax credit applicant shall provide a written request to the board, requesting the board to provide such certification to the department;

             (b) A written agreement is submitted to the department before the start of the public facility project, signed by the public agency responsible for the public facility and the business spending money on the public facility, establishing the financial obligations of the business and stating that the public facility is to be owned and controlled by the public agency;

             (c) If the facility will be owned by the business until completion, a written agreement is submitted to the department providing a mechanism for transfer of ownership of the facility to the public agency upon completion of the project; and

             (d) The business, in consultation with the public agency, provides a letter to the department establishing that the public facility will enable the business to create, retain, or expand jobs. The business making the expenditures must be the same business upon which the job criteria is based. A business may not use the jobs upon which an earlier project was based to justify additional projects for which the business is applying for tax credits.

             (4)(a) Tax credits are available on a first-come basis, with priority based on the date an application is received by the department. Upon completion of a public facility, as determined by the department, the department shall certify the business as eligible for tax credits under this section. An applicant is not eligible for tax credits under this section in excess of the amount of tax that would otherwise be due under this chapter. Approved credit may be carried over one calendar year after the year in which the credit is approved. Any unused credit remaining after the one-year carry-over period has elapsed expires. Refunds shall not be given in place of credits.

             (b) The department shall keep a running total of all credits approved. The sum total of credits granted under this section and section 18 of this act shall be no more than five million dollars of credits each fiscal year. If the amount requested for a credit in an application will cause the cap to be exceeded, the department shall give a partial approval of the project, equal to the amount of remaining credit available for the fiscal year.

             (c) The amount of credit taken is not confidential or subject to RCW 82.32.330, and is disclosable by the department as a public record.

             (5) Investments in a public facility do not give the private-sector business a right or privilege, or any other benefit in the public facility.

             (6) An application under this section may not be approved after June 30, 2005.

             (7) Tax credits shall not be granted for spending that occurred before the effective date of this section. Applicants are not eligible based on a loan or grant approved before the effective date of this section.

             (8) If a person has used a credit granted under this section against tax due under chapter 82.16 RCW the person may not use the same credit for tax due under this chapter.

             (9) The tax credit program under this section and section 18 of this act is limited to expenditures for public facilities located in distressed counties. "Distressed county" means a county in which the average level of unemployment for the three years before the year in which an application is filed under this section exceeds the average state unemployment for those years by twenty percent.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 17. A new section is added to chapter 82.16 RCW to read as follows:

             The tax credit program under section 17 of this act is available to persons for tax due under this chapter. If a person has used a credit granted under this section against tax due under chapter 82.04 RCW the person may not use the same credit for tax due under this chapter.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. It is the intent of the legislature to promote the creation and the retention of jobs. To that end section 20, chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (section 20 of this act) allows counties to provide public facilities that will attract and retain businesses, thereby creating and maintaining jobs.


             Sec. 19. RCW 82.14.370 and 1997 c 366 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The legislative authority of a distressed county may impose a sales and use tax in accordance with the terms of this chapter. The tax is in addition to other taxes authorized by law and shall be collected from those persons who are taxable by the state under chapters 82.08 and 82.12 RCW upon the occurrence of any taxable event within the county. The rate of tax shall not exceed ((0.04)) 0.12 percent of the selling price in the case of a sales tax or value of the article used in the case of a use tax.

             (2) The tax imposed under subsection (1) of this section shall be deducted from the amount of tax otherwise required to be collected or paid over to the department of revenue under chapter 82.08 or 82.12 RCW. The department of revenue shall perform the collection of such taxes on behalf of the county at no cost to the county.

             (3) Moneys collected under this section shall only be used for the purpose of financing qualifying public facilities in rural counties. The public facility must be listed as an item in the economic development section of the comprehensive plan for those counties planning under RCW 36.70A.040, or, for those counties who do not plan under the growth management act, the public facility must be listed in the county's capital facilities plan. For the purposes of this section, "public facilities" means bridges, roads, domestic and industrial water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, railroad, electricity, natural gas, buildings or structures, and port facilities, in the state of Washington.

             (4) No tax may be collected under this section before July 1, 1998. No tax may be collected under this section by a county more than twenty-five years after the date that a tax is first imposed under this section.

             (5) For purposes of this section, "distressed county" means a county in which the average level of unemployment for the three years before the year in which a tax is first imposed under this section exceeds the average state ((employment)) unemployment for those years by twenty percent.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 20. Sections 9 through 16 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 84 RCW.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 21. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 22. This act takes effect July 1, 1998."


             Correct the title.


POINT OF ORDER


             Representative Reams requested a ruling on Scope and Object of amendment 937 to House Bill No. 2748.


SPEAKER'S RULING


             Mr. Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding): Representative Reams, the Speaker is prepared to rule on your Point of Order challenging the Scope and Object of amendment 937 to House Bill No. 2748.


             House Bill No. 2748 is titled "AN ACT Relating to allowing rural counties to authorized additional industrial development in rural areas". It adds a new section to RCW 36.70A, the statutes that deal with the growth management act.


             Amendment 937 by Representative Morris amends Title 82 which deals with the tax laws in this State providing for additional industrial developments making available certain tax benefits for manufacturing projects in distressed counties. The amendment is clearly outside the Scope of the Title of the bill.


             Representative Reams, your Point of Order is well taken.


             There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


             Representatives Mulliken, Reams, Clements, Doumit, Alexander and Morris spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


             Representatives Romero, Gardner, Kessler and Lantz spoke against passage of the bill.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of House Bill No. 2748.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of House Bill No. 2748, and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 74, Nays - 22, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Anderson, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Butler, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Chopp, Clements, Conway, Cooke, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Doumit, Dunn, Dyer, Eickmeyer, Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Keiser, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Linville, Lisk, Mason, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Morris, Mulliken, Murray, O'Brien, Parlette, Pennington, Quall, Radcliff, Reams, Robertson, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Smith, Sommers, D., Sterk, Sullivan, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Tokuda, Van Luven, Wensman, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 74.

             Voting nay: Representatives Appelwick, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Cooper, Costa, Dickerson, Dunshee, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Kastama, Kenney, Lantz, Ogden, Poulsen, Regala, Romero, Scott, Sommers, H., Veloria and Wolfe - 22.

             Excused: Representatives Skinner and Zellinsky - 2.


             House Bill No. 2748, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


             HOUSE BILL NO. 2871, by Representatives Parlette, Chandler, Wensman, Anderson, Reams, Clements, Romero, Linville, Gardner and Thompson

 

Creating a system of classifying land as agricultural land with long-term commercial significance for tax purposes.


             The bill was read the second time. There being no objection, Substitute House Bill No. 2871 was substituted for House Bill No. 2871 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.


             Substitute House Bill No. 2871 was read the second time.


             With the consent of the House, amendment number 928 to Substitute House Bill No. 2871 was withdrawn.


             Representative Parlette moved the adoption of amendment (991):


             On page 5, after line 20, insert:

             "Sec. 7. RCW 84.34.020 and 1997 c 429 s 31 are each amended to read as follows:

             As used in this chapter, unless a different meaning is required by the context:

             (1) "Open space land" means (a) any land area so designated by an official comprehensive land use plan adopted by any city or county and zoned accordingly, or (b) any land area, the preservation of which in its present use would (i) conserve and enhance natural or scenic resources, or (ii) protect streams or water supply, or (iii) promote conservation of soils, wetlands, beaches or tidal marshes, or (iv) enhance the value to the public of abutting or neighboring parks, forests, wildlife preserves, nature reservations or sanctuaries or other open space, or (v) enhance recreation opportunities, or (vi) preserve historic sites, or (vii) preserve visual quality along highway, road, and street corridors or scenic vistas, or (viii) retain in its natural state tracts of land not less than one acre situated in an urban area and open to public use on such conditions as may be reasonably required by the legislative body granting the open space classification, or (c) any land meeting the definition of farm and agricultural conservation land under subsection (8) of this section. As a condition of granting open space classification, the legislative body may not require public access on land classified under (b)(iii) of this subsection for the purpose of promoting conservation of wetlands.

             (2) "Farm and agricultural land" means:

             (a) Any parcel of land that is twenty or more acres or multiple parcels of land that are contiguous and total twenty or more acres:

             (i) Devoted primarily to the production of livestock or agricultural commodities for commercial purposes;

             (ii) Enrolled in the federal conservation reserve program or its successor administered by the United States department of agriculture; or

             (iii) Other similar commercial activities as may be established by rule;

             (b) Any parcel of land that is five acres or more but less than twenty acres devoted primarily to agricultural uses, which has produced a gross income from agricultural uses equivalent to, as of January 1, 1993:

             (i) One hundred dollars or more per acre per year for three of the five calendar years preceding the date of application for classification under this chapter for all parcels of land that are classified under this subsection or all parcels of land for which an application for classification under this subsection is made with the granting authority prior to January 1, 1993; and

             (ii) On or after January 1, 1993, two hundred dollars or more per acre per year for three of the five calendar years preceding the date of application for classification under this chapter;

             (c) Any parcel of land of less than five acres devoted primarily to agricultural uses which has produced a gross income as of January 1, 1993, of:

             (i) One thousand dollars or more per year for three of the five calendar years preceding the date of application for classification under this chapter for all parcels of land that are classified under this subsection or all parcels of land for which an application for classification under this subsection is made with the granting authority prior to January 1, 1993; and

             (ii) On or after January 1, 1993, fifteen hundred dollars or more per year for three of the five calendar years preceding the date of application for classification under this chapter.

Parcels of land described in (b)(i) and (c)(i) of this subsection shall, upon any transfer of the property excluding a transfer to a surviving spouse, be subject to the limits of (b)(ii) and (c)(ii) of this subsection.

             Agricultural lands shall also include such incidental uses as are compatible with agricultural purposes, including wetlands preservation, provided such incidental use does not exceed twenty percent of the classified land and the land on which appurtenances necessary to the production, preparation, or sale of the agricultural products exist in conjunction with the lands producing such products. Agricultural lands shall also include any parcel of land of one to five acres, which is not contiguous, but which otherwise constitutes an integral part of farming operations being conducted on land qualifying under this section as "farm and agricultural lands"; or

             (d) The land on which housing for employees and the principal place of residence of the farm operator or owner of land classified pursuant to (a) of this subsection is sited if: The housing or residence is on or contiguous to the classified parcel; and the use of the housing or the residence is integral to the use of the classified land for agricultural purposes((;

             (e) Any parcel of land designated as agricultural land under RCW 36.70A.170; or

             (f) Any parcel of land not within an urban growth area zoned as agricultural land under a comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW)).

             (3) "Timber land" means any parcel of land that is five or more acres or multiple parcels of land that are contiguous and total five or more acres which is or are devoted primarily to the growth and harvest of forest crops for commercial purposes. A timber management plan shall be filed with the county legislative authority at the time (a) an application is made for classification as timber land pursuant to this chapter or (b) when a sale or transfer of timber land occurs and a notice of classification continuance is signed. Timber land means the land only.

             (4) "Current" or "currently" means as of the date on which property is to be listed and valued by the assessor.

             (5) "Owner" means the party or parties having the fee interest in land, except that where land is subject to real estate contract "owner" shall mean the contract vendee.

             (6) "Contiguous" means land adjoining and touching other property held by the same ownership. Land divided by a public road, but otherwise an integral part of a farming operation, shall be considered contiguous.

             (7) "Granting authority" means the appropriate agency or official who acts on an application for classification of land pursuant to this chapter.

             (8) "Farm and agricultural conservation land" means either:

             (a) Land that was previously classified under subsection (2) of this section, that no longer meets the criteria of subsection (2) of this section, and that is reclassified under subsection (1) of this section; or

             (b) Land that is traditional farmland that is not classified under chapter 84.33 or 84.34 RCW, that has not been irrevocably devoted to a use inconsistent with agricultural uses, and that has a high potential for returning to commercial agriculture.


             Sec. 8. RCW 84.34.065 and 1997 c 429 s 33 are each amended to read as follows:

             The true and fair value of farm and agricultural land, including land classified under section 2 of this act, shall be determined by consideration of the earning or productive capacity of comparable lands from crops grown most typically in the area averaged over not less than five years, capitalized at indicative rates. The earning or productive capacity of farm and agricultural lands shall be the "net cash rental", capitalized at a "rate of interest" charged on long term loans secured by a mortgage on farm or agricultural land plus a component for property taxes. The current use value of land under RCW 84.34.020(2)(d) shall be established as: The prior year's average value of open space farm and agricultural land used in the county plus the value of land improvements such as septic, water, and power used to serve the residence. This shall not be interpreted to require the assessor to list improvements to the land with the value of the land.

             ((In valuing any tract or parcel of real property designated and zoned under a comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW as agricultural, forest, or open space land, the appraisal shall not be based on similar sales of parcels that have been converted to nonagricultural, nonforest, or nonopen-space uses within five years after the sale.))

             For the purposes of the above computation:

             (1) The term "net cash rental" shall mean the average rental paid on an annual basis, in cash, for the land being appraised and other farm and agricultural land of similar quality and similarly situated that is available for lease for a period of at least three years to any reliable person without unreasonable restrictions on its use for production of agricultural crops. There shall be allowed as a deduction from the rental received or computed any costs of crop production charged against the landlord if the costs are such as are customarily paid by a landlord. If "net cash rental" data is not available, the earning or productive capacity of farm and agricultural lands shall be determined by the cash value of typical or usual crops grown on land of similar quality and similarly situated averaged over not less than five years. Standard costs of production shall be allowed as a deduction from the cash value of the crops.

             The current "net cash rental" or "earning capacity" shall be determined by the assessor with the advice of the advisory committee as provided in RCW 84.34.145, and through a continuing internal study, assisted by studies of the department of revenue. This net cash rental figure as it applies to any farm and agricultural land may be challenged before the same boards or authorities as would be the case with regard to assessed values on general property.

             (2) The term "rate of interest" shall mean the rate of interest charged by the farm credit administration and other large financial institutions regularly making loans secured by farm and agricultural lands through mortgages or similar legal instruments, averaged over the immediate past five years.

             The "rate of interest" shall be determined annually by a rule adopted by the department of revenue and such rule shall be published in the state register not later than January 1 of each year for use in that assessment year. The department of revenue determination may be appealed to the state board of tax appeals within thirty days after the date of publication by any owner of farm or agricultural land or the assessor of any county containing farm and agricultural land.

             (3) The "component for property taxes" shall be a figure obtained by dividing the assessed value of all property in the county into the property taxes levied within the county in the year preceding the assessment and multiplying the quotient obtained by one hundred.


             Sec. 9. RCW 84.40.030 and 1997 c 429 s 34 (Referendum Bill No. 47), 1997 c 134 s 1, and 1997 c 3 s 104 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

             All personal property shall be valued at one hundred percent of its true and fair value in money and assessed on the same basis unless specifically provided otherwise by law.

             All real property shall be appraised at one hundred percent of its true and fair value in money and assessed as provided in RCW 84.40.0305 unless specifically provided otherwise by law.

             Taxable leasehold estates shall be valued at such price as they would bring at a fair, voluntary sale for cash without any deductions for any indebtedness owed including rentals to be paid.

             The true and fair value of real property for taxation purposes (including property upon which there is a coal or other mine, or stone or other quarry) shall be based upon the following criteria:

             (1) Any sales of the property being appraised or similar properties with respect to sales made within the past five years. The appraisal shall be consistent with the comprehensive land use plan, development regulations under chapter 36.70A RCW, zoning, and any other governmental policies or practices in effect at the time of appraisal that affect the use of property, as well as physical and environmental influences. An assessment may not be determined by a method that assumes a land usage not permitted, for that property being appraised, under existing zoning or land use planning ordinances or statutes. The appraisal shall also take into account: (a) In the use of sales by real estate contract as similar sales, the extent, if any, to which the stated selling price has been increased by reason of the down payment, interest rate, or other financing terms; and (b) the extent to which the sale of a similar property actually represents the general effective market demand for property of such type, in the geographical area in which such property is located. Sales involving deed releases or similar seller-developer financing arrangements shall not be used as sales of similar property.

             (2) In addition to sales as defined in subsection (1) of this section, consideration may be given to cost, cost less depreciation, reconstruction cost less depreciation, or capitalization of income that would be derived from prudent use of the property. In the case of property of a complex nature, or being used under terms of a franchise from a public agency, or operating as a public utility, or property not having a record of sale within five years and not having a significant number of sales of similar property in the general area, the provisions of this subsection (((2))) shall be the dominant factors in valuation. When provisions of this subsection (((2))) are relied upon for establishing values the property owner shall be advised upon request of the factors used in arriving at such value.

             (3) In valuing any tract or parcel of real property, the true and fair value of the land, exclusive of structures thereon shall be determined; also the true and fair value of structures thereon, but the appraised valuation shall not exceed the true and fair value of the total property as it exists. In valuing agricultural land, growing crops shall be excluded.

             (((4) In valuing any tract or parcel of real property designated and zoned under a comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW as agricultural, forest, or open space land, the appraisal shall not be based on similar sales of parcels that have been converted to nonagricultural, nonforest, or nonopen-space uses within five years after the sale.))"


             Renumber sections consecutively, correct any internal references accordingly, and correct the title.


             Representative Parlette spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


             The amendment was adopted. The bill was ordered engrossed.


             There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


             Representatives Parlette and Dunshee spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2871.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2871 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Anderson, Appelwick, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Butler, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Chopp, Clements, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooke, Cooper, Costa, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kenney, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Lantz, Linville, Lisk, Mason, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Morris, Mulliken, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Parlette, Pennington, Poulsen, Quall, Radcliff, Reams, Regala, Robertson, Romero, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Smith, Sommers, D., Sommers, H., Sterk, Sullivan, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Tokuda, Van Luven, Veloria, Wensman, Wolfe, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 96.

             Excused: Representatives Skinner and Zellinsky - 2.


             Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2871, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


             HOUSE BILL NO. 3099, by Representatives DeBolt, Kessler and Johnson

 

Revising the definition of "major industrial development" for the purpose of growth management planning.


             The bill was read the second time. There being no objection, Substitute House Bill No. 3099 was substituted for House Bill No. 3099 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.


             Substitute House Bill No. 3099 was read the second time.


             Representative Dunshee moved the adoption of amendment (938):


             On page 3, after line 11, insert the following:


             "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 82.04 RCW to read as follows:

             (1) The definitions in this subsection apply to this section, sections 3 and 4 of this act, RCW 82.62.030, and sections 9 through 16 of this act, unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

             (a) "Business" means the person applying for the tax deferral, credit, or exemption.

             (b) "Construction" means the construction of a manufacturing operation complex and includes labor and services rendered in respect to construction. "Construction" ends when a project is completed as determined under subsection (2)(c) of this section.

             (c) "Distressed county" means a county in which the average level of unemployment for the three years before the year in which an application is filed under this chapter exceeds the average state unemployment for those years by twenty percent.

             (d) "Employment position" means a position in which a permanent full-time employee is employed in a project during the entire tax year. "The entire tax year" means the full-time position is filled for a period of twelve consecutive months. "Full-time" means at least thirty-five hours a week.

             (e) "Equipping and operating" means the acquisition of tangible personal property for use at the manufacturing operation complex, and includes labor and services rendered in respect to the installation of tangible personal property.

             (f) "Finished product" means an article, substance, or commodity that is manufactured at and shipped from the manufacturing operation complex.

             (g) "Manufacturing operation complex" means the buildings, structures, and improvements located at the site where the manufacturing activity occurs. The complex includes the buildings, structures, and improvements used to receive, store, and ship raw materials and finished products as well as buildings, structures, and improvements used for the manufacturing production line. In addition, the term includes all administrative offices, employee support facilities, and production support facilities located at the site. The manufacturing operation complex does not include buildings, structures, and improvements located off of the site.

             (h) "Person" has the meaning given in RCW 82.04.030.

             (i) "Project" means the site preparation, construction, and equipping and operating of a manufacturing operation complex.

             (j) "Raw material" means the ingredients, components, substances, articles, or other tangible personal property that is received at the manufacturing operation complex for use as ingredients or components of the finished product.

             (k) "Site" means a discrete geographical location.

             (l) "Site preparation" means demolition of existing improvements, environmental remediation, earth moving, land clearing, site excavation, and shoring, and includes labor and services rendered in respect to site preparation.

             (2) As a condition to receiving initial approval and as a condition of continuing eligibility, the following criteria must be met:

             (a) The project must be located in a distressed county and must be owned and operated by a person who meets the definition of "manufacturer" as defined in RCW 82.04.110;

             (b) The business must commit to an investment, by the time of completion of the project, in land, structures, and equipment, the value of which must be at least four percent of the total of the equalized assessed value in the county in which the project is located. The total equalized assessed value in the county is as published annually by the department in accordance with RCW 84.48.080. Continuing eligibility is conditioned on this investment having actually occurred;

             (c)(i) The business must commit to and must create a minimum of twenty new employment positions at the project within two years of completion of the project.

             (ii) The business must commit to and create one new employment position for each two million dollars invested in the project within two years of completion of the project. The twenty minimum positions in (c)(i) of this subsection are part of and not in addition to the positions required to meet the investment to job ratio.

             (iii) The individuals in the new employment positions must be the employees of the business and must not have been relocated from other locations of the business within this state. Completion of the project is deemed to have occurred when the project is capable of operating and producing finished products. The department of community, trade, and economic development shall determine when the project is complete;

             (d) The business must commit to and must pay an average wage of at least one hundred fifty percent of the average wage in the county. The employment security department shall determine the average wage in the county and shall report this amount to the department of community, trade, and economic development; and

             (e) The business must remain operational for a fifteen-year period after the project is completed. "Operational" means that the level of employment at the manufacturing operation complex must not drop below the total employment positions required under (c) of this subsection.

             (3)(a) The department of community, trade, and economic development shall determine the eligibility of a business and certify eligibility to the department of revenue.

             (b) Approval of the project by a public vote of the governing body of the county or city in which the project is located is a precondition to deferral certification by the department of revenue. If the county or city approves the project, the county or city shall send a written notification of the approval to the department of revenue. If the project is in two jurisdictions, both jurisdictions must approve the project.

             (c) When both of the notices under (a) and (b) of this subsection are received, the department of revenue shall issue a sales and use tax deferral certificate for use under sections 3 and 4 of this act.

             (4) In addition to the initial certification under subsection (3) of this section, the project must be reviewed by the department of community, trade, and economic development each year for continuing eligibility. The business shall provide an annual report to the department of community, trade, and economic development, in a form as required by the department, of its status relative to the eligibility criteria under subsection (2) of this section. The department of community, trade, and economic development shall review the annual report and determine whether the project continues to meet the eligibility criteria. The department of community, trade, and economic development shall provide a written notice of this determination to the business and to the department of revenue. Annual reapproval by the county or city in which the project is located is not required. If the project fails to meet the eligibility criteria the amount of taxes deferred under sections 3 and 4 of this act are immediately due.

             (5) Taxes deferred under sections 3 and 4 of this act need not be repaid if the project maintains its eligibility criteria for a fifteen-year period. The fifteen-year period begins when the deferral certificate is sent under subsection (3)(c) of this section by the department of revenue to the business.

             (6) Application for the deferral under sections 3 and 4 of this act may not be accepted before the effective date of this section or after June 30, 2003.

             (7) The employment security department shall provide such data to the department of revenue and the department of community, trade, and economic development as is necessary to administer this section wage data shall be updated annually to reflect current state and county conditions.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 82.08 RCW to read as follows:

             (1) A person that has received a certification from the department under section 2(3)(c) of this act may use that certificate for deferral of the state share of taxes due under this chapter on the site preparation, construction, and equipping and operating of the project.

             (2) The certificate is not valid for sales that occurred before certification by the department. After the project is determined to be complete under section 2(2)(c) of this act, the certificate is limited to taxes related to equipping and operating of the project.

             (3)(a) The certificate may be used for fifteen years after its issuance.

             (b) The deferral under this section is conditioned on the business remaining eligible under section 2 of this act. If the project fails to meet the eligibility criteria, the amount of taxes deferred under this section are immediately due. The department shall assess interest at the rate provided for delinquent excise taxes, but not penalties, retroactively to the date of deferral.

             (4) The buyer must keep such records as the department requires for audit and verification purposes.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 82.12 RCW to read as follows:

             (1) A person that has received a certification from the department under section 2(3)(c) of this act may use that certificate for deferral of the state share of taxes due under this chapter on the site preparation, construction, and equipping and operating of the project.

             (2) The certificate is not valid for tax due on use that occurred before certification by the department. After the project is determined to be complete under section 2(2)(c) of this act, the certificate is limited to tax due on use of tangible personal property related to equipping and operating of the project.

             (3)(a) The certificate may be used for fifteen years after its issuance.

             (b) The deferral under this section is conditioned on the business remaining eligible under section 2 of this act. If the project fails to meet the eligibility criteria, the amount of taxes deferred under this section are immediately due. The department shall assess interest at the rate provided for delinquent excise taxes, but not penalties, retroactively to the date of deferral.

             (4) The buyer must keep such records as the department requires for audit and verification purposes.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. A new section is added to chapter 82.14 RCW to read as follows:

             The deferral under sections 3 and 4 of this act is for the state portion of the sales and use tax and does not extend to the tax imposed in this chapter.


             Sec. 5. RCW 81.104.170 and 1997 c 450 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

             Cities that operate transit systems, county transportation authorities, metropolitan municipal corporations, public transportation benefit areas, and regional transit authorities may submit an authorizing proposition to the voters and if approved by a majority of persons voting, fix and impose a sales and use tax in accordance with the terms of this chapter, solely for the purpose of providing high capacity transportation service.

             The tax authorized pursuant to this section shall be in addition to the tax authorized by RCW 82.14.030 and shall be collected from those persons who are taxable by the state pursuant to chapters 82.08 and 82.12 RCW upon the occurrence of any taxable event within the taxing district. The maximum rate of such tax shall be approved by the voters and shall not exceed one percent of the selling price (in the case of a sales tax) or value of the article used (in the case of a use tax). The maximum rate of such tax that may be imposed shall not exceed nine-tenths of one percent in any county that imposes a tax under RCW 82.14.340, or within a regional transit authority if any county within the authority imposes a tax under RCW 82.14.340. The exemptions in RCW 82.08.820 and 82.12.820 are for the state portion of the sales and use tax and do not extend to the tax authorized in this section.

             The deferral in sections 3 and 4 of this act is for the state portion of the sales tax and does not extend to the tax imposed in this chapter.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. A new section is added to chapter 82.32 RCW to read as follows:

             The department of revenue may develop and institute a tax reporting method whereby the taxpayer uses deductions, credits, or other accounting techniques, as directed by the department, to allow the department to administer, and the taxpayer to report, the deferral in sections 3 and 4 of this act simply and efficiently. Taxpayers who are entitled to this deferral and sellers who receive deferral certificates from buyers shall keep their records in a form and manner as directed by the department so that the department can distinguish between taxable and exempt transactions.


             Sec. 7. RCW 82.62.030 and 1997 c 366 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) A person shall be allowed a credit against the tax due under chapter 82.04 RCW as provided in this section. For an application approved before January 1, 1996, the credit shall equal one thousand dollars for each qualified employment position directly created in an eligible business project. For an application approved on or after January 1, 1996, the credit shall equal two thousand dollars for each qualified employment position directly created in an eligible business project. For an application approved on or after July 1, 1997, the credit shall equal four thousand dollars for each qualified employment position with wages and benefits greater than forty thousand dollars annually that is directly created in an eligible business. For an application approved on or after July 1, 1997, the credit shall equal two thousand dollars for each qualified employment position with wages and benefits less than or equal to forty thousand dollars annually that is directly created in an eligible business.

             (2) The department shall keep a running total of all credits granted under this chapter during each fiscal year. The department shall not allow any credits which would cause the tabulation to exceed five million five hundred thousand dollars in fiscal year 1998 or 1999 or seven million five hundred thousand dollars in any fiscal year thereafter. If all or part of an application for credit is disallowed under this subsection, the disallowed portion shall be carried over for approval the next fiscal year. However, the applicant's carryover into the next fiscal year is only permitted if the tabulation for the next fiscal year does not exceed the cap for that fiscal year as of the date on which the department has disallowed the application.

             (3) No recipient may use the tax credits to decertify a union or to displace existing jobs in any community in the state.

             (4) No recipient may receive a tax credit on taxes which have not been paid during the taxable year.

             (5) A business that has received certification from the department of revenue under section 2 of this act is eligible for an annual credit of four thousand dollars for each of the positions used to establish project eligibility. Positions created in excess of those required to maintain eligibility are also eligible for the credit under this subsection. The business may apply for the credit once the project is complete, as determined in section 2 of this act. The business may apply each of the successive seven years following its initial application under this subsection and shall receive the credit if the continuing employment requirements of section 2 of this act are met. The credits granted under this subsection do not affect the caps under subsection (2) of this section and the fifteen percent requirement under RCW 82.62.010. Application for the credit under this subsection may not be accepted before the effective date of this section.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. (1) All real and personal property belonging to a business and used in connection with a project that qualifies under this chapter is exempt from ad valorem property taxation for fifteen successive years from completion of construction and certification of the project, as determined under section 2 of this act.

             (2) The exemption does not include real or personal property acquired or constructed prior to the approval of the application prescribed in this chapter. The exemption provided by this chapter is in addition to any other incentives, tax credits, or grants provided by law.

             (3) The definitions in section 2 of this act apply to this chapter, where applicable.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. A person making application for exemption under this chapter must meet the requirements of section 2 of this act and must enter into a contract approved by the department and the governing body or bodies of the city or county in which the project is located. In the contract the applicant must agree to the requirements of section 2 of this act and this chapter. The department of revenue may not accept any application for exemption under this chapter after June 30, 2003.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. An applicant seeking a tax exemption under this chapter must complete the following procedures:

             (1) The applicant shall apply to the department on forms prepared by the department. The application for exemption must contain the following:

             (a) A description of the manner in which the applicant intends to proceed with acquisition and construction of the project, together with proposed time frames for accomplishing the requirements of section 2 of this act and this chapter; and

             (b) A statement that the applicant is aware of the potential tax liability that will be imposed if the property ceases to be eligible for the exemption provided under this chapter.

             (2) The applicant must verify the application for exemption by oath or affirmation.

             (3) The department may permit the applicant to revise an application for exemption before final action on the application is taken by the department.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. The department may approve the application for exemption filed under this chapter if it finds that:

             (1) The proposed project is or will be, at the time of completion, in conformance with all applicable local government regulations in effect at the time the application for exemption is approved;

             (2) The applicant has complied with all requirements under this chapter;

             (3) The site of the project is located in a distressed county, as defined by section 2 of this act; and

             (4) The governing body of the county or city in which the project is located has by a public vote approved the project and has sent a written notification of the approval to the department.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. (1) The department shall approve or deny an application for exemption filed under this chapter within sixty days after it is received, unless in the discretion of the department additional time is necessary in order to make a decision.

             (2) If the application for exemption is approved, the department shall issue the applicant a conditional certificate of tax exemption. The certificate must contain a statement by a duly authorized administrative official of the department that the applicant has complied with the requirements of this chapter.

             (3) If the application for exemption is denied by the department, the deciding administrative official shall state in writing the reasons for the denial and mail the notice to the applicant at the applicant's last known address within ten days of the denial.

             (4) Upon receiving a denial of the application for a property tax exemption under this chapter, the applicant may appeal the denial to the board of tax appeals in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure of the board. This appeal must be submitted within thirty days of the date the notice is received. If the exemption is denied, the sixty-day time period for approving the application for exemption regarding the project must be extended to the extent necessary to accommodate the appeal process.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 13. (1) Upon completion of construction of a project for which an application for exemption under this chapter has been approved, the owner of the eligible business shall file with the department the following:

             (a) A statement of the amount of expenditures for land, structures, machinery, and equipment made with respect to the project;

             (b) A description of the work that has been completed and a statement that the owner's property qualifies the property for exemption under this chapter; and

             (c) A statement that the work has been completed within two years of the issuance of the conditional certificate of tax exemption.

             (2) Within thirty days of the date the statements required under subsection (1) of this section are received, the authorized representative of the department shall determine whether the work completed is consistent with the application for exemption and the contract approved by the legislative authority of the local taxing districts and is qualified for exemption under this chapter. The department shall also determine which completed improvements specifically meet the requirements and required findings.

             (3) The department shall file the certificate of tax exemption with the county assessor within ten days of approval if:

             (a) The construction is completed within two years of the date the conditional certificate of tax exemption was issued or within an authorized extension of this time limit; and

             (b) The authorized representative of the department determines that improvements were constructed consistent with the application for exemption and other applicable requirements and the applicant's property is qualified for exemption under this chapter.

             (4) The authorized representative of the department shall notify the applicant that a certificate of tax exemption will not be issued if the representative determines that:

             (a) The construction was not completed within two years of the approval date or within any authorized extension of the time limit;

             (b) The improvements were not constructed consistent with the application for exemption or other applicable requirements; or

             (c) The applicant's property is otherwise not qualified for exemption under this chapter.

             (5) If the authorized representative of the department finds that the project was not completed within the required time period is due to circumstances beyond the control of the applicant and that the applicant has been acting and could reasonably be expected to act in good faith and with due diligence, the department may extend the deadline for completion of the project for a period not to exceed twenty-four consecutive months.

             (6) The decision by the deciding officer that an owner of an eligible business is not entitled to a certificate of tax exemption may be appealed to the board of tax appeals in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure of the board.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 14. (1) Within thirty days of the anniversary of the date the certificate of tax exemption was issued and each year thereafter for a period of fifteen years, the owner of the eligible business shall file with a designated representative of the department of community, trade, and economic development an annual report indicating the following:

             (a) A certification by the owner that the use of the property has not changed since the date the certificate was approved by the department; and

             (b) A description of changes or improvements made after the certificate of tax exemption was issued.

             (2) The department of community, trade, and economic development shall annually determine whether the business meets the requirements of this chapter and shall annually report this determination to the department of revenue.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 15. (1) Land, structures, and machinery and equipment that have been exempted under this chapter shall continue to be exempt if not converted to another use for at least fifteen years from the date of issuance of the certificate of tax exemption. If the owner intends to convert the development to another use, the owner must notify the assessor within sixty days of the change in use. If, after a certificate of tax exemption has been filed with the county assessor, the assessor discovers that the use of a portion of the property has changed or will be changed to a use that no longer meets the requirements as previously approved or agreed upon by contract between the department and the owner and that the eligible business no longer qualifies for the exemption, the tax exemption must be canceled and the following must occur:

             (a) Additional property tax must be imposed upon the property in the amount that would normally be imposed, plus a penalty amounting to twenty percent of the additional tax. This additional tax is calculated based upon the difference between the property tax paid and the amount of property tax otherwise due and payable had the property not been granted an exemption. The tax, together with penalty and interest, is due in accordance with RCW 84.56.020 the year following the year the property no longer qualifies for exemption;

             (b) The tax must include interest upon the amount of additional tax at the same statutory rate charged on delinquent property taxes from the dates on which the additional tax could have been paid without penalty if the property had been assessed at a value without regard to this chapter; and

             (c) An additional tax unpaid on its due date is delinquent. From the date of delinquency until the additional tax and penalty are paid, interest must be charged at the same rate applied by law to delinquent ad valorem property taxes. The additional tax owed together with interest and penalty become a lien on the land and attach at the time the property or portion of the property no longer meets applicable requirement. The lien has priority to and must be fully paid and satisfied before a recognizance, mortgage, judgment, debt, obligation, or responsibility to or with which the land may become charged or liable. The lien may be foreclosed upon expiration of the same period after delinquency and in the same manner provided by law for foreclosure of liens for delinquent real or personal property taxes.

             (2) When a determination has been made that a tax exemption is to be canceled for a reason stated in this section, the department shall notify the owner of the property, shown by the tax rolls, by mail that the exemption will be canceled. Upon receiving the notice that the exemption is to be canceled, the owner may appeal the cancellation to the board of tax appeals in accordance with the rules of practice and procedures of the board. This appeal must be submitted within thirty days of the date the notice of cancellation is received and must specify the factual and legal basis on which the determination of cancellation is alleged to be erroneous.

             (3) Upon receiving notice from the department or its authorized representative that an exemption has been canceled, the county officials having possession of the assessment and tax rolls shall correct the rolls and collect additional taxes, interest, and penalty in accordance with this section.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 16. A new section is added to chapter 82.04 RCW to read as follows:

             (1) As used in this section:

             (a) "Board" means the community economic revitalization board under chapter 43.160 RCW;

             (b) "Private-sector business" or "business" means "person" as defined in RCW 82.04.030. "Private-sector business" does not include a public agency. "Public agency" means the state or its agencies, instrumentalities, or political subdivisions, or the United States or any instrumentality thereof, or an Indian tribe or nation; and

             (c) "Public facilities" means bridges, roads, domestic and industrial water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, railroad, electricity, natural gas, buildings or structures, and port facilities, in the state of Washington.

             (2) A person shall be allowed a credit against tax due under this chapter or chapter 82.16 RCW as provided in this section. The credit shall equal fifty cents for each dollar of private funds spent on qualifying public facilities. A person may not receive credit for funds spent by another person. Eligible spending is limited to construction, reconstruction, or improvement of the public facility, and includes rights of way and real property acquisition, engineering and design work, environmental assessment and mitigation, and materials acquisition.

             (3) The department, subject to the limitations of subsection (4) of this section, shall approve applications for tax credits upon occurrence of the following:

             (a) A written certification is submitted by the board to the department, stating the applicant has been approved for a loan or grant under chapter 43.160 RCW. The tax credit applicant shall provide a written request to the board, requesting the board to provide such certification to the department;

             (b) A written agreement is submitted to the department before the start of the public facility project, signed by the public agency responsible for the public facility and the business spending money on the public facility, establishing the financial obligations of the business and stating that the public facility is to be owned and controlled by the public agency;

             (c) If the facility will be owned by the business until completion, a written agreement is submitted to the department providing a mechanism for transfer of ownership of the facility to the public agency upon completion of the project; and

             (d) The business, in consultation with the public agency, provides a letter to the department establishing that the public facility will enable the business to create, retain, or expand jobs. The business making the expenditures must be the same business upon which the job criteria is based. A business may not use the jobs upon which an earlier project was based to justify additional projects for which the business is applying for tax credits.

             (4)(a) Tax credits are available on a first-come basis, with priority based on the date an application is received by the department. Upon completion of a public facility, as determined by the department, the department shall certify the business as eligible for tax credits under this section. An applicant is not eligible for tax credits under this section in excess of the amount of tax that would otherwise be due under this chapter. Approved credit may be carried over one calendar year after the year in which the credit is approved. Any unused credit remaining after the one-year carry-over period has elapsed expires. Refunds shall not be given in place of credits.

             (b) The department shall keep a running total of all credits approved. The sum total of credits granted under this section and section 18 of this act shall be no more than five million dollars of credits each fiscal year. If the amount requested for a credit in an application will cause the cap to be exceeded, the department shall give a partial approval of the project, equal to the amount of remaining credit available for the fiscal year.

             (c) The amount of credit taken is not confidential or subject to RCW 82.32.330, and is disclosable by the department as a public record.

             (5) Investments in a public facility do not give the private-sector business a right or privilege, or any other benefit in the public facility.

             (6) An application under this section may not be approved after June 30, 2005.

             (7) Tax credits shall not be granted for spending that occurred before the effective date of this section. Applicants are not eligible based on a loan or grant approved before the effective date of this section.

             (8) If a person has used a credit granted under this section against tax due under chapter 82.16 RCW the person may not use the same credit for tax due under this chapter.

             (9) The tax credit program under this section and section 18 of this act is limited to expenditures for public facilities located in distressed counties. "Distressed county" means a county in which the average level of unemployment for the three years before the year in which an application is filed under this section exceeds the average state unemployment for those years by twenty percent.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 17. A new section is added to chapter 82.16 RCW to read as follows:

             The tax credit program under section 17 of this act is available to persons for tax due under this chapter. If a person has used a credit granted under this section against tax due under chapter 82.04 RCW the person may not use the same credit for tax due under this chapter.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. It is the intent of the legislature to promote the creation and the retention of jobs. To that end section 20, chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (section 20 of this act) allows counties to provide public facilities that will attract and retain businesses, thereby creating and maintaining jobs.


             Sec. 19. RCW 82.14.370 and 1997 c 366 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The legislative authority of a distressed county may impose a sales and use tax in accordance with the terms of this chapter. The tax is in addition to other taxes authorized by law and shall be collected from those persons who are taxable by the state under chapters 82.08 and 82.12 RCW upon the occurrence of any taxable event within the county. The rate of tax shall not exceed ((0.04)) 0.12 percent of the selling price in the case of a sales tax or value of the article used in the case of a use tax.

             (2) The tax imposed under subsection (1) of this section shall be deducted from the amount of tax otherwise required to be collected or paid over to the department of revenue under chapter 82.08 or 82.12 RCW. The department of revenue shall perform the collection of such taxes on behalf of the county at no cost to the county.

             (3) Moneys collected under this section shall only be used for the purpose of financing qualifying public facilities in rural counties. The public facility must be listed as an item in the economic development section of the comprehensive plan for those counties planning under RCW 36.70A.040, or, for those counties who do not plan under the growth management act, the public facility must be listed in the county's capital facilities plan. For the purposes of this section, "public facilities" means bridges, roads, domestic and industrial water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, railroad, electricity, natural gas, buildings or structures, and port facilities, in the state of Washington.

             (4) No tax may be collected under this section before July 1, 1998. No tax may be collected under this section by a county more than twenty-five years after the date that a tax is first imposed under this section.

             (5) For purposes of this section, "distressed county" means a county in which the average level of unemployment for the three years before the year in which a tax is first imposed under this section exceeds the average state ((employment)) unemployment for those years by twenty percent.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 20. Sections 9 through 16 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 84 RCW.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 21. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 22. This act takes effect July 1, 1998."


             Correct the title.


POINT OF ORDER


             Representative DeBolt requested a ruling on Scope and Object on amendment number 938 to Substitute House Bill No. 3099.


SPEAKER'S RULING


             Mr. Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding): Representative DeBolt. The Speaker is prepared to rule on your Point of Order challenging the Scope and Object of amendment 938 to Substitute House Bill No. 3099.


             The title of House Bill No. 3099 is broad; "AN ACT Relating to industrial developments". It amends section 36.70A that deals with the growth management act.


             Amendment 938 amends Title 82, Tax Codes of the State, providing additional industrial development tax incentives. Although the amendment is clearly within the Scope of the Title, it is beyond the object of the bill.


             Representative DeBolt, your Point of Order is well taken.


             There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


             Representatives DeBolt, Fisher, Romero and Alexander spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


MOTION


             On motion by Representative Butler, Representative Veloria was excused.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 3099.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 3099 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 95, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 3.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Anderson, Appelwick, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Butler, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Chopp, Clements, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooke, Cooper, Costa, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky,Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kenney, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Lantz, Linville, Lisk, Mason, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Morris, Mulliken, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Parlette, Pennington, Poulsen, Quall, Radcliff, Reams, Regala, Robertson, Romero, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Smith, Sommers, D., Sommers, H., Sterk, Sullivan, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Tokuda, Van Luven, Wensman, Wolfe, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 95.

             Excused: Representatives Skinner, Veloria and Zellinsky - 3.


             Substitute House Bill No. 3099, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


             HOUSE BILL NO. 2831, by Representatives Crouse and Mielke


             Unbundling the components of electrical service.


             The bill was read the second time. There being no objection, Second Substitute House Bill No. 2831 was substituted for House Bill No. 2831 and the second substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.


             Second Substitute House Bill No. 2831 was read the second time.


             Representative Crouse moved the adoption of amendment (943):


             On page 2, line 23, before "public" strike "or" and insert "a port district, a water-sewer district, or a"


             Representatives Crouse and Poulsen spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


             The amendment was adopted.


             Representative Crouse moved the adoption of amendment (942):


             On page 3, beginning on line 27, after "study" strike "with the information and documentation"


             Representatives Crouse spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


             The amendment was adopted.


             Representative Crouse moved the adoption of amendment (941):


             On page 4, line 10, after "(this act)," strike all material through "act." on line 12 and insert "as directed by the commission for an electrical company or the governing body of a consumer-owned utility, the electric utility shall use the data from either the cost study used to formulate the retail rates in effect as of the effective date of this act, or a more recent cost study."


             On page 4, line 30, strike "and"


             On page 4, line 34, strike "choice." and insert "choice; and

             (g) The time period over which cost data were compiled."


             On page 6, line 21, after "methods" insert ", or to require the commission to approve new revenue levels for electrical companies"


             Representative Crouse spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


             The amendment was adopted. The bill was ordered engrossed.


             There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


             Representatives Crouse, Dyer and Poulsen spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


             Representative Cooper spoke against passage of the bill.


MOTION


             On motion of Representative Kessler, Representative Morris was excused.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 2831.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 2831 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 77, Nays - 17, Absent - 0, Excused - 4.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Anderson, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Butler, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Clements, Cooke, Costa, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Doumit, Dunn, Dunshee, Dyer, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hankins, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Kastama, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Lantz, Linville, Lisk, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Mulliken, O'Brien, Ogden, Parlette, Pennington, Poulsen, Quall, Radcliff, Reams, Regala, Robertson, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Smith, Sommers, D., Sommers, H., Sterk, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Tokuda, Van Luven, Wensman, Wolfe, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 77.

             Voting nay: Representatives Appelwick, Chopp, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooper, Dickerson, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Hatfield, Keiser, Kenney, Mason, Murray, Romero and Sullivan - 17.

             Excused: Representatives Morris, Skinner, Veloria and Zellinsky - 4.


             Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 2831, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


             HOUSE BILL NO. 2935, by Representatives Dyer, Cody, Huff and Backlund


             Nursing home payment rates.


             The bill was read the second time. There being no objection, Second Substitute House Bill No. 2935 was substituted for House Bill No. 2935 and the second substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.


             Second Substitute House Bill No. 2935 was read the second time.


             Representative Dyer moved the adoption of striking amendment (1004):


             Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:


             "Sec. 1. RCW 74.46.010 and 1980 c 177 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

             This chapter may be known and cited as the "nursing ((Homes Auditing and Cost Reimbursement Act of 1980)) facility medicaid payment system."


             Sec. 2. RCW 74.46.020 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 90 are each amended to read as follows:

             Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.

             (1) "Accrual method of accounting" means a method of accounting in which revenues are reported in the period when they are earned, regardless of when they are collected, and expenses are reported in the period in which they are incurred, regardless of when they are paid.

             (2) (("Ancillary care" means those services required by the individual, comprehensive plan of care provided by qualified therapists.

             (3))) "Appraisal" means the process of estimating the fair market value or reconstructing the historical cost of an asset acquired in a past period as performed by a professionally designated real estate appraiser with no pecuniary interest in the property to be appraised. It includes a systematic, analytic determination and the recording and analyzing of property facts, rights, investments, and values based on a personal inspection and inventory of the property.

             (((4))) (3) "Arm's-length transaction" means a transaction resulting from good-faith bargaining between a buyer and seller who are not related organizations and have adverse positions in the market place. Sales or exchanges of nursing home facilities among two or more parties in which all parties subsequently continue to own one or more of the facilities involved in the transactions shall not be considered as arm's-length transactions for purposes of this chapter. Sale of a nursing home facility which is subsequently leased back to the seller within five years of the date of sale shall not be considered as an arm's-length transaction for purposes of this chapter.

             (((5))) (4) "Assets" means economic resources of the contractor, recognized and measured in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

             (((6))) (5) "Audit" or "department audit" means an examination of the records of a nursing facility participating in the medicaid payment system, including but not limited to: The contractor's financial and statistical records, cost reports and all supporting documentation and schedules, receivables, and resident trust funds, to be performed as deemed necessary by the department and according to department rule.        (6) "Bad debts" means amounts considered to be uncollectible from accounts and notes receivable.

             (7) (("Beds" means the number of set-up beds in the facility, not to exceed the number of licensed beds.

             (8))) "Beneficial owner" means:

             (a) Any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares:

             (i) Voting power which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of such ownership interest; and/or

             (ii) Investment power which includes the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition of such ownership interest;

             (b) Any person who, directly or indirectly, creates or uses a trust, proxy, power of attorney, pooling arrangement, or any other contract, arrangement, or device with the purpose or effect of divesting himself or herself of beneficial ownership of an ownership interest or preventing the vesting of such beneficial ownership as part of a plan or scheme to evade the reporting requirements of this chapter;

             (c) Any person who, subject to ((subparagraph)) (b) of this subsection, has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of such ownership interest within sixty days, including but not limited to any right to acquire:

             (i) Through the exercise of any option, warrant, or right;

             (ii) Through the conversion of an ownership interest;

             (iii) Pursuant to the power to revoke a trust, discretionary account, or similar arrangement; or

             (iv) Pursuant to the automatic termination of a trust, discretionary account, or similar arrangement;

except that, any person who acquires an ownership interest or power specified in ((subparagraphs)) (c)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this ((subparagraph (c))) subsection with the purpose or effect of changing or influencing the control of the contractor, or in connection with or as a participant in any transaction having such purpose or effect, immediately upon such acquisition shall be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the ownership interest which may be acquired through the exercise or conversion of such ownership interest or power;

             (d) Any person who in the ordinary course of business is a pledgee of ownership interest under a written pledge agreement shall not be deemed to be the beneficial owner of such pledged ownership interest until the pledgee has taken all formal steps necessary which are required to declare a default and determines that the power to vote or to direct the vote or to dispose or to direct the disposition of such pledged ownership interest will be exercised; except that:

             (i) The pledgee agreement is bona fide and was not entered into with the purpose nor with the effect of changing or influencing the control of the contractor, nor in connection with any transaction having such purpose or effect, including persons meeting the conditions set forth in ((subparagraph)) (b) of this subsection; and

             (ii) The pledgee agreement, prior to default, does not grant to the pledgee:

             (A) The power to vote or to direct the vote of the pledged ownership interest; or

             (B) The power to dispose or direct the disposition of the pledged ownership interest, other than the grant of such power(s) pursuant to a pledge agreement under which credit is extended and in which the pledgee is a broker or dealer.

             (((9))) (8) "Capitalization" means the recording of an expenditure as an asset.

             (((10))) (9) "Case mix" means a measure of the intensity of care and services needed by the residents of a nursing facility or a group of residents in the facility.

             (10) "Case mix index" means a number representing the average case mix of a nursing facility.

             (11) "Case mix weight" means a numeric score that identifies the relative resources used by a particular group of a nursing facility's residents.

             (12) "Contractor" means ((an)) a person or entity ((which contracts)) licensed under chapter 18.51 RCW to operate a medicare and medicaid certified nursing facility, responsible for operational decisions, and contracting with the department to provide services to ((medical care)) medicaid recipients residing in ((a)) the facility ((and which entity is responsible for operational decisions)).

             (((11))) (13) "Default case" means no initial assessment has been completed for a resident and transmitted to the department by the cut-off date, or an assessment is otherwise past due for the resident, under state and federal requirements.

             (14) "Department" means the department of social and health services (DSHS) and its employees.

             (((12))) (15) "Depreciation" means the systematic distribution of the cost or other basis of tangible assets, less salvage, over the estimated useful life of the assets.

             (((13))) (16) "Direct care" means nursing care and related care provided to nursing facility residents. Therapy care shall not be considered part of direct care.

             (17) "Direct care supplies" means medical, pharmaceutical, and other supplies required for the direct ((nursing and ancillary)) care of ((medical care recipients)) a nursing facility's residents.

             (((14))) (18) "Entity" means an individual, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, or any other association of individuals capable of entering enforceable contracts.

             (((15))) (19) "Equity" means the net book value of all tangible and intangible assets less the recorded value of all liabilities, as recognized and measured in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

             (((16))) (20) "Facility" or "nursing facility" means a nursing home licensed in accordance with chapter 18.51 RCW, excepting nursing homes certified as institutions for mental diseases, or that portion of a multiservice facility licensed as a nursing home, or that portion of a hospital licensed in accordance with chapter 70.41 RCW which operates as a nursing home.

             (((17))) (21) "Fair market value" means the replacement cost of an asset less observed physical depreciation on the date for which the market value is being determined.

             (((18))) (22) "Financial statements" means statements prepared and presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles including, but not limited to, balance sheet, statement of operations, statement of changes in financial position, and related notes.

             (((19))) (23) "Generally accepted accounting principles" means accounting principles approved by the financial accounting standards board (FASB).

             (((20) "Generally accepted auditing standards" means auditing standards approved by the American institute of certified public accountants (AICPA).

             (21))) (24) "Goodwill" means the excess of the price paid for a nursing facility business over the fair market value of all ((other)) net identifiable((,)) tangible((,)) and intangible assets acquired, as measured in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

             (((22))) (25) "Grouper" means a computer software product that groups individual nursing facility residents into case mix classification groups based on specific resident assessment data and computer logic.

             (26) "Historical cost" means the actual cost incurred in acquiring and preparing an asset for use, including feasibility studies, architect's fees, and engineering studies.

             (((23))) (27) "Imprest fund" means a fund which is regularly replenished in exactly the amount expended from it.

             (((24))) (28) "Joint facility costs" means any costs which represent resources which benefit more than one facility, or one facility and any other entity.

             (((25))) (29) "Lease agreement" means a contract between two parties for the possession and use of real or personal property or assets for a specified period of time in exchange for specified periodic payments. Elimination (due to any cause other than death or divorce) or addition of any party to the contract, expiration, or modification of any lease term in effect on January 1, 1980, or termination of the lease by either party by any means shall constitute a termination of the lease agreement. An extension or renewal of a lease agreement, whether or not pursuant to a renewal provision in the lease agreement, shall be considered a new lease agreement. A strictly formal change in the lease agreement which modifies the method, frequency, or manner in which the lease payments are made, but does not increase the total lease payment obligation of the lessee, shall not be considered modification of a lease term.

             (((26))) (30) "Medical care program" or "medicaid program" means medical assistance, including nursing care, provided under RCW 74.09.500 or authorized state medical care services.

             (((27))) (31) "Medical care recipient," "medicaid recipient," or "recipient" means an individual determined eligible by the department for the services provided ((in)) under chapter 74.09 RCW.

             (((28))) (32) "Minimum data set" means the overall data component of the resident assessment instrument, indicating the strengths, needs, and preferences of an individual nursing facility resident.

             (33) "Net book value" means the historical cost of an asset less accumulated depreciation.

             (((29))) (34) "Net invested funds" means the net book value of tangible fixed assets employed by a contractor to provide services under the medical care program, including land, buildings, and equipment as recognized and measured in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, plus an allowance for working capital which shall be five percent of the product of the per patient day rate multiplied by the prior calendar year reported total patient days of each contractor.

             (((30))) (35) "Operating lease" means a lease under which rental or lease expenses are included in current expenses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

             (((31))) (36) "Owner" means a sole proprietor, general or limited partners, members of a limited liability company, and beneficial interest holders of five percent or more of a corporation's outstanding stock.

             (((32))) (37) "Ownership interest" means all interests beneficially owned by a person, calculated in the aggregate, regardless of the form which such beneficial ownership takes.

             (((33))) (38) "Patient day" or "resident day" means a calendar day of care provided to a nursing facility resident, regardless of payment source, which will include the day of admission and exclude the day of discharge; except that, when admission and discharge occur on the same day, one day of care shall be deemed to exist. A "((client day)) medicaid day" or "recipient day" means a calendar day of care provided to a ((medical care)) medicaid recipient determined eligible by the department for services provided under chapter 74.09 RCW, subject to the same conditions regarding admission and discharge applicable to a patient day or resident day of care.

             (((34))) (39) "Professionally designated real estate appraiser" means an individual who is regularly engaged in the business of providing real estate valuation services for a fee, and who is deemed qualified by a nationally recognized real estate appraisal educational organization on the basis of extensive practical appraisal experience, including the writing of real estate valuation reports as well as the passing of written examinations on valuation practice and theory, and who by virtue of membership in such organization is required to subscribe and adhere to certain standards of professional practice as such organization prescribes.

             (((35))) (40) "Qualified therapist" means:

             (a) ((An activities specialist who has specialized education, training, or experience as specified by the department;

             (b) An audiologist who is eligible for a certificate of clinical competence in audiology or who has the equivalent education and clinical experience;

             (c))) A mental health professional as defined by chapter 71.05 RCW;

             (((d))) (b) A mental retardation professional who is ((either a qualified therapist or)) a therapist approved by the department who has had specialized training or one year's experience in treating or working with the mentally retarded or developmentally disabled;

             (((e) A social worker who is a graduate of a school of social work;

             (f))) (c) A speech pathologist who is eligible for a certificate of clinical competence in speech pathology or who has the equivalent education and clinical experience;

             (((g))) (d) A physical therapist as defined by chapter 18.74 RCW;

             (((h))) (e) An occupational therapist who is a graduate of a program in occupational therapy, or who has the equivalent of such education or training; and

             (((i))) (f) A respiratory care practitioner certified under chapter 18.89 RCW.

             (((36) "Questioned costs" means those costs which have been determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles but which may constitute disallowed costs or departures from the provisions of this chapter or rules and regulations adopted by the department.

             (37))) (41) "Real property," whether leased or owned by the contractor, means the building, allowable land, land improvements, and building improvements associated with a nursing facility.

             (42) "Rebased rate" or "cost-rebased rate" means a facility-specific component rate assigned to a nursing facility for a particular rate period established on desk-reviewed, adjusted costs reported for that facility covering at least six months of a prior calendar year designated as a year to be used for cost rebasing payment rates under the provisions of this chapter.

             (((38))) (43) "Records" means those data supporting all financial statements and cost reports including, but not limited to, all general and subsidiary ledgers, books of original entry, and transaction documentation, however such data are maintained.

             (((39))) (44) "Related organization" means an entity which is under common ownership and/or control with, or has control of, or is controlled by, the contractor.

             (a) "Common ownership" exists when an entity is the beneficial owner of five percent or more ownership interest in the contractor and any other entity.

             (b) "Control" exists where an entity has the power, directly or indirectly, significantly to influence or direct the actions or policies of an organization or institution, whether or not it is legally enforceable and however it is exercisable or exercised.

             (((40))) (45) "Related care" means only those services that are directly related to providing direct care to nursing facility residents. These services include, but are not limited to, nursing direction and supervision, medical direction, medical records, pharmacy services, activities, and social services.

             (46) "Resident assessment instrument," including federally approved modifications for use in this state, means a federally mandated, comprehensive nursing facility resident care planning and assessment tool, consisting of the minimum data set and resident assessment protocols.

             (47) "Resident assessment protocols" means those components of the resident assessment instrument that use the minimum data set to trigger or flag a resident's potential problems and risk areas.

             (48) "Resource utilization groups" means a case mix classification system that identifies relative resources needed to care for an individual nursing facility resident.

             (49) "Restricted fund" means those funds the principal and/or income of which is limited by agreement with or direction of the donor to a specific purpose.

             (((41))) (50) "Secretary" means the secretary of the department of social and health services.

             (((42))) (51) "Support services" means food, food preparation, dietary, housekeeping, and laundry services provided to nursing facility residents.

             (52) "Therapy care" means those services required by a nursing facility resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care, that are provided by qualified therapists, or support personnel under their supervision, including related costs as designated by the department.

             (53) "Title XIX" or "medicaid" means the 1965 amendments to the social security act, P.L. 89-07, as amended and the medicaid program administered by the department.

             (((43) "Physical plant capital improvement" means a capitalized improvement that is limited to an improvement to the building or the related physical plant.))


             Sec. 3. RCW 74.46.040 and 1985 c 361 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) Not later than March 31st of each year, each contractor shall submit to the department an annual cost report for the period from January 1st through December 31st of the preceding year.

             (2) Not later than one hundred twenty days following the termination of a contract, the terminating contractor shall submit to the department a cost report for the period from January 1st through the date the contract terminated.

             (3) Two extensions of not more than thirty days each may be granted by the department upon receipt of a written request setting forth the circumstances which prohibit the contractor from compliance with a report due date; except, that the ((secretary)) department shall establish the grounds for extension in rule ((and regulation)). Such request must be received by the department at least ten days prior to the due date.


             Sec. 4. RCW 74.46.050 and 1985 c 361 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) If the cost report is not properly completed or if it is not received by the due date, all or part of any payments due under the contract may be withheld by the department until such time as the required cost report is properly completed and received.

             (2) The department may impose civil fines, or take adverse rate action against contractors and former contractors who do not submit properly completed cost reports by the applicable due date. The department is authorized to adopt rules addressing fines and adverse rate actions including procedures, conditions, and the magnitude and frequency of fines.


             Sec. 5. RCW 74.46.060 and 1985 c 361 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) Cost reports shall be prepared in a standard manner and form, as determined by the department((, which shall provide for an itemized list of allowable costs and a preliminary settlement report)). Costs reported shall be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the provisions of this chapter, and such additional rules ((and regulations as are)) established by the ((secretary)) department. In the event of conflict, rules adopted and instructions issued by the department take precedence over generally accepted accounting principles.

             (2) The records shall be maintained on the accrual method of accounting and agree with or be reconcilable to the cost report. All revenue and expense accruals shall be reversed against the appropriate accounts unless they are received or paid, respectively, within one hundred twenty days after the accrual is made. However, if the contractor can document a good faith billing dispute with the supplier or vendor, the period may be extended, but only for those portions of billings subject to good faith dispute. Accruals for vacation, holiday, sick pay, payroll, and real estate taxes may be carried for longer periods, provided the contractor follows generally accepted accounting principles and pays this type of accrual when due.


             Sec. 6. RCW 74.46.080 and 1985 c 361 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) All records supporting the required cost reports, as well as trust funds established by RCW 74.46.700, shall be retained by the contractor for a period of four years following the filing of such reports at a location in the state of Washington specified by the contractor. ((All records supporting the cost reports and financial statements filed with the department before May 20, 1985, shall be retained by the contractor for four years following their filing.))

             (2) The department may direct supporting records to be retained for a longer period if there remain unresolved questions on the cost reports. All such records shall be made available upon demand to authorized representatives of the department, the office of the state auditor, and the United States department of health and human services.

             (((2))) (3) When a contract is terminated, all payments due will be withheld until accessibility and preservation of the records within the state of Washington are assured.


             Sec. 7. RCW 74.46.090 and 1985 c 361 s 8 are each amended to read as follows:

             The department will retain the required cost reports for a period of one year after final settlement or reconciliation, or the period required under chapter 40.14 RCW, whichever is longer. Resident assessment information and records shall be retained as provided elsewhere in statute or by department rule.


             Sec. 8. RCW 74.46.100 and 1985 c 361 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:

             ((The principles inherent within RCW 74.46.105 and 74.46.130 are)) (1) The purposes of department audits under this chapter are to ascertain, through department audit of the financial and statistical records of the contractor's nursing facility operation, that:

             (((1) To ascertain, through department audit, that the)) (a) Allowable costs for each year for each medicaid nursing facility are accurately reported((, thereby providing a valid basis for future rate determination));

             (((2) To ascertain, through department audits of the cost reports, that)) (b) Cost reports ((properly)) accurately reflect the true financial condition, revenues, expenditures, equity, beneficial ownership, related party status, and records of the contractor((, particularly as they pertain to related organizations and beneficial ownership, thereby providing a valid basis for the determination of return as specified by this chapter));

             (((3) To ascertain, through department audit that compliance with the accounting and auditing provisions of this chapter and the rules and regulations of the department as they pertain to these accounting and auditing provisions is proper and consistent)) (c) The contractor's revenues, expenditures, and costs of the building, land, land improvements, building improvements, and movable and fixed equipment are recorded in compliance with department requirements, instructions, and generally accepted accounting principles; and

             (((4) To ascertain, through department audits, that)) (d) The responsibility of the contractor has been met in the maintenance and disbursement of patient trust funds.

             (2) The department shall examine the submitted cost report, or a portion thereof, of each contractor for each nursing facility for each report period to determine if the information is correct, complete, reported in conformance with department instructions and generally accepted accounting principles, the requirements of this chapter, and rules as the department may adopt. The department shall determine the scope of the examination.

             (3) If the examination finds that the cost report is incorrect or incomplete, the department may make adjustments to the reported information for purposes of establishing payment rates or in determining amounts to be recovered in direct care, therapy care, and support services under section 10 (3) and (4) of this act or in any component rate resulting from undocumented or misreported costs. A schedule of the adjustments shall be provided to the contractor, including dollar amount and explanations for the adjustments. Adjustments shall be subject to review if desired by the contractor under the appeals or exception procedure established by the department.

             (4) Examinations of resident trust funds and receivables shall be reported separately and in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and rules adopted by the department.

             (5) The contractor shall:

             (a) Provide access to the nursing facility, all financial and statistical records, and all working papers that are in support of the cost report, receivables, and resident trust funds. To ensure accuracy, the department may require the contractor to submit for departmental review any underlying financial statements or other records, including income tax returns, relating to the cost report directly or indirectly;

             (b) Prepare a reconciliation of the cost report with (i) applicable federal income and federal and state payroll tax returns; and (ii) the records for the period covered by the cost report;

             (c) Make available to the department's auditor an individual or individuals to respond to questions and requests for information from the auditor. The designated individual or individuals shall have sufficient knowledge of the issues, operations, or functions to provide accurate and reliable information.

             (6) If an examination discloses material discrepancies, undocumented costs, or mishandling of resident trust funds, the department may open or reopen one or both of the two preceding cost report or resident trust fund periods, whether examined or unexamined, for indication of similar discrepancies, undocumented costs, or mishandling of resident trust funds.

             (7) Any assets, liabilities, revenues, or expenses reported as allowable that are not supported by adequate documentation in the contractor's records shall be disallowed. Documentation must show both that costs reported were incurred during the period covered by the report and were related to resident care, and that assets reported were used in the provision of resident care.

             (8) When access is required at the facility or at another location in the state, the department shall notify a contractor of its intent to examine all financial and statistical records, and all working papers that are in support of the cost report, receivables, and resident trust funds.

             (9) The department is authorized to assess civil fines and take adverse rate action if a contractor, or any of its employees, does not allow access to the contractor's nursing facility records.

             (10) RCW 74.46.100 through 74.46.130, and rules adopted by the department pursuant thereto prior to January 1, 1998, shall continue to govern the medicaid nursing facility audit process for periods prior to January 1, 1997, as if these statutes and rules remained in full force and effect.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. (1) The department shall reconcile medicaid resident days to billed days and medicaid payments for each medicaid nursing facility for the preceding calendar year, or for that portion of the calendar year the provider's contract was in effect.

             (2) The contractor shall make any payment owed the department, determined by the process of reconciliation, by the process of settlement at the lower of cost or rate in direct care, therapy care, and support services component rates, as authorized in this chapter, within sixty days after notification and demand for payment is sent to the contractor.

             (3) The department shall make any payment due the contractor within sixty days after it determines the underpayment exists and notification is sent to the contractor.

             (4) Interest at the rate of one percent per month accrues against the department or the contractor on an unpaid balance existing sixty days after notification is sent to the contractor. Accrued interest shall be adjusted back to the date it began to accrue if the payment obligation is subsequently revised after administrative or judicial review.

             (5) The department is authorized to withhold funds from the contractor's payment for services, and to take all other actions authorized by law, to recover amounts due and payable from the contractor, including any accrued interest. Neither a timely filed request to pursue any administrative appeals or exception procedure that the department may establish in rule, nor commencement of judicial review as may be available to the contractor in law, to contest a payment obligation determination shall delay recovery from the contractor or payment to the contractor.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. (1) Contractors shall be required to submit with each annual nursing facility cost report a proposed settlement report showing underspending or overspending in each component rate during the cost report year on a per-resident day basis. The department shall accept or reject the proposed settlement report, explain any adjustments, and issue a revised settlement report if needed.

             (2) Contractors shall not be required to refund payments made in property, return on investment, and financing allowance component rates, nor shall they be required to refund payments made in operations component rates, in excess of the adjusted costs of providing services corresponding to these components.

             (3) The facility will return to the department any overpayment amounts in each of the nursing services, administrative, and operational component rates. The facility will return to the department any overpayment amounts in each of the direct care, therapy care, and support services rate components that the department identifies following the audit and settlement procedures as described in chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (this act), provided that the contractor may retain any overpayment that does not exceed 1.0% of the facility's direct care, therapy care, and support services component rate. Facilities that are not in substantial compliance, as defined by federal survey regulations during the period for which settlement is being calculated, will not be allowed to retain any amount of overpayment in the facility's direct care, therapy care, and support services component rate.

             (4) Determination of unused rate funds, including the amounts of direct care, therapy care, and support services to be recovered, shall be done separately for each component rate, and neither costs nor rate payments shall be shifted from one component rate or corresponding service area to another in determining the degree of underspending or recovery, if any.

             (5) Total and component payment rates assigned to a nursing facility, as calculated and revised, if needed, under the provisions of this chapter and those rules as the department may adopt, shall represent the maximum payment for nursing facility services rendered to medicaid recipients for the period the rates are in effect. No increase in payment to a contractor shall result from spending above the total payment rate or in any rate component.

             (6) RCW 74.46.150 through 74.46.180, and rules adopted by the department prior to the effective date of this section, shall continue to govern the medicaid settlement process for nursing facilities, including refunds, interest obligations, and other rights of the parties, for periods prior to January 1, 1999, as if these statutes and rules remained in full force and effect.

             (7) For calendar year 1999, the department shall calculate split settlements covering January 1, 1999, through June 30, 1999, and July 1, 1999, through December 31, 1999. For the first half of calendar year 1999, rules specified in subsection (6) of this section shall apply and for the second half of calendar year 1999, the provisions of this chapter shall apply. The department shall, by rule, determine the division of calendar year 1999 adjusted costs for settlement purposes.


             Sec. 11. RCW 74.46.190 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 96 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The substance of a transaction will prevail over its form.

             (2) All documented costs which are ordinary, necessary, related to care of medical care recipients, and not expressly unallowable under this chapter or department rule, are to be allowable. Costs of providing ((ancillary)) therapy care are allowable, subject to any applicable ((cost center)) limit contained in this chapter, provided documentation establishes the costs were incurred for medical care recipients and other sources of payment to which recipients may be legally entitled, such as private insurance or medicare, were first fully utilized.

             (3) ((Costs applicable to services, facilities, and supplies furnished to the provider by related organizations are allowable but at the cost to the related organization, provided they do not exceed the price of comparable services, facilities, or supplies that could be purchased elsewhere.

             (4) Beginning January 1, 1985,)) The payment for property usage is to be independent of ownership structure and financing arrangements.

             (((5) Beginning July 1, 1995,)) (4) Allowable costs shall not include costs reported by a ((nursing care provider)) contractor for a prior period to the extent such costs, due to statutory exemption, will not be incurred by the nursing facility in the period to be covered by the rate.


             Sec. 12. RCW 74.46.220 and 1980 c 177 s 22 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) Costs applicable to services, facilities, and supplies furnished by a related organization to the contractor shall be allowable only to the extent they do not exceed the lower of the cost to the related organization or the price of comparable services, facilities, or supplies purchased elsewhere.

             (2) Documentation of costs to the related organization shall be made available to the ((auditor at the time and place the records relating to the entity are audited)) department. Payments to or for the benefit of the related organization will be disallowed where the cost to the related organization cannot be documented.


             Sec. 13. RCW 74.46.230 and 1993 sp.s. c 13 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The necessary and ordinary one-time expenses directly incident to the preparation of a newly constructed or purchased building by a contractor for operation as a licensed facility shall be allowable costs. These expenses shall be limited to start-up and organizational costs incurred prior to the admission of the first patient.

             (2) Start-up costs shall include, but not be limited to, administrative and nursing salaries, utility costs, taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and training; except, that they shall exclude expenditures for capital assets. These costs will be allowable in the ((administrative)) operations cost center if they are amortized over a period of not less than sixty months beginning with the month in which the first patient is admitted for care.

             (3) Organizational costs are those necessary, ordinary, and directly incident to the creation of a corporation or other form of business of the contractor including, but not limited to, legal fees incurred in establishing the corporation or other organization and fees paid to states for incorporation; except, that they do not include costs relating to the issuance and sale of shares of capital stock or other securities. Such organizational costs will be allowable in the ((administrative)) operations cost center if they are amortized over a period of not less than sixty months beginning with the month in which the first patient is admitted for care.


             Sec. 14. RCW 74.46.270 and 1983 1st ex.s. c 67 s 13 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The contractor shall disclose to the department:

             (a) The nature and purpose of all costs which represent allocations of joint facility costs; and

             (b) The methodology of the allocation utilized.

             (2) Such disclosure shall demonstrate that:

             (a) The services involved are necessary and nonduplicative; and

             (b) Costs are allocated in accordance with benefits received from the resources represented by those costs.

             (3) Such disclosure shall be made not later than September ((30, 1980,)) 30th for the following calendar year ((and not later than September 30th for each year thereafter)); except that a new contractor shall submit the first year's disclosure ((together with the submissions required by RCW 74.46.670. Where a contractor will make neither a change in the joint costs to be incurred nor in the allocation methodology, the contractor may certify that no change will be made in lieu of the disclosure required in subsection (1) of this section)) at least sixty days prior to the date the new contract becomes effective.

             (4) The department shall ((approve such methodology not later than)) by December 31st, ((1980, and not later than December 31st for each year thereafter)) for all disclosures that are complete and timely submitted, either approve or reject the disclosure. The department may request additional information or clarification.

             (5) Acceptance of a disclosure or approval of a joint cost methodology by the department may not be construed as a determination that the allocated costs are allowable in whole or in part. However, joint facility costs not disclosed, allocated, and reported in conformity with this section and department rules are unallowable.

             (6) An approved methodology may be revised or amended subject to approval as provided in rules and regulations adopted by the department.


             Sec. 15. RCW 74.46.280 and 1993 sp.s. c 13 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) Management fees will be allowed only if:

             (a) A written management agreement both creates a principal/agent relationship between the contractor and the manager, and sets forth the items, services, and activities to be provided by the manager; and

             (b) Documentation demonstrates that the services contracted for were actually delivered.

             (2) To be allowable, fees must be for necessary, nonduplicative services.

             (3) A management fee paid to or for the benefit of a related organization will be allowable to the extent it does not exceed the lower of the actual cost to the related organization of providing necessary services related to patient care under the agreement or the cost of comparable services purchased elsewhere. Where costs to the related organization represent joint facility costs, the measurement of such costs shall comply with RCW 74.46.270.

             (4) A copy of the agreement must be received by the department at least sixty days before it is to become effective. A copy of any amendment to a management agreement must also be received by the department at least thirty days in advance of the date it is to become effective. Failure to meet these deadlines will result in the unallowability of cost incurred more than sixty days prior to submitting a management agreement and more than thirty days prior to submitting an amendment.

             (5) The scope of services to be performed under a management agreement cannot be so extensive that the manager or managing entity is substituted for the contractor in fact, substantially relieving the contractor/licensee of responsibility for operating the facility.


             Sec. 16. RCW 74.46.300 and 1980 c 177 s 30 are each amended to read as follows:

             Rental or lease costs under arm's-length operating leases of office equipment shall be allowable to the extent the cost is necessary and ordinary. The department may adopt rules to limit the allowability of office equipment leasing expenses.


             Sec. 17. RCW 74.46.410 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 97 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) Costs will be unallowable if they are not documented, necessary, ordinary, and related to the provision of care services to authorized patients.

             (2) Unallowable costs include, but are not limited to, the following:

             (a) Costs of items or services not covered by the medical care program. Costs of such items or services will be unallowable even if they are indirectly reimbursed by the department as the result of an authorized reduction in patient contribution;

             (b) Costs of services and items provided to recipients which are covered by the department's medical care program but not included in ((care services)) the medicaid per-resident day payment rate established by the department under this chapter;

             (c) Costs associated with a capital expenditure subject to section 1122 approval (part 100, Title 42 C.F.R.) if the department found it was not consistent with applicable standards, criteria, or plans. If the department was not given timely notice of a proposed capital expenditure, all associated costs will be unallowable up to the date they are determined to be reimbursable under applicable federal regulations;

             (d) Costs associated with a construction or acquisition project requiring certificate of need approval, or exemption from the requirements for certificate of need for the replacement of existing nursing home beds, pursuant to chapter 70.38 RCW if such approval or exemption was not obtained;

             (e) Interest costs other than those provided by RCW 74.46.290 on and after January 1, 1985;

             (f) Salaries or other compensation of owners, officers, directors, stockholders, partners, principals, participants, and others associated with the contractor or its home office, including all board of directors' fees for any purpose, except reasonable compensation paid for service related to patient care;

             (g) Costs in excess of limits or in violation of principles set forth in this chapter;

             (h) Costs resulting from transactions or the application of accounting methods which circumvent the principles of the ((cost-related reimbursement)) payment system set forth in this chapter;

             (i) Costs applicable to services, facilities, and supplies furnished by a related organization in excess of the lower of the cost to the related organization or the price of comparable services, facilities, or supplies purchased elsewhere;

             (j) Bad debts of non-Title XIX recipients. Bad debts of Title XIX recipients are allowable if the debt is related to covered services, it arises from the recipient's required contribution toward the cost of care, the provider can establish that reasonable collection efforts were made, the debt was actually uncollectible when claimed as worthless, and sound business judgment established that there was no likelihood of recovery at any time in the future;

             (k) Charity and courtesy allowances;

             (l) Cash, assessments, or other contributions, excluding dues, to charitable organizations, professional organizations, trade associations, or political parties, and costs incurred to improve community or public relations;

             (m) Vending machine expenses;

             (n) Expenses for barber or beautician services not included in routine care;

             (o) Funeral and burial expenses;

             (p) Costs of gift shop operations and inventory;

             (q) Personal items such as cosmetics, smoking materials, newspapers and magazines, and clothing, except those used in patient activity programs;

             (r) Fund-raising expenses, except those directly related to the patient activity program;

             (s) Penalties and fines;

             (t) Expenses related to telephones, televisions, radios, and similar appliances in patients' private accommodations;

             (u) Federal, state, and other income taxes;

             (v) Costs of special care services except where authorized by the department;

             (w) Expenses of an employee benefit not in fact made available to all employees on an equal or fair basis, for example, key-man insurance and other insurance or retirement plans ((not made available to all employees));

             (x) Expenses of profit-sharing plans;

             (y) Expenses related to the purchase and/or use of private or commercial airplanes which are in excess of what a prudent contractor would expend for the ordinary and economic provision of such a transportation need related to patient care;

             (z) Personal expenses and allowances of owners or relatives;

             (aa) All expenses of maintaining professional licenses or membership in professional organizations;

             (bb) Costs related to agreements not to compete;

             (cc) Amortization of goodwill, lease acquisition, or any other intangible asset, whether related to resident care or not, and whether recognized under generally accepted accounting principles or not;

             (dd) Expenses related to vehicles which are in excess of what a prudent contractor would expend for the ordinary and economic provision of transportation needs related to patient care;

             (ee) Legal and consultant fees in connection with a fair hearing against the department where a decision is rendered in favor of the department or where otherwise the determination of the department stands;

             (ff) Legal and consultant fees of a contractor or contractors in connection with a lawsuit against the department;

             (gg) Lease acquisition costs ((and)), goodwill, the cost of bed rights, or any other ((intangibles not related to patient care)) intangible assets;

             (hh) All rental or lease costs other than those provided in RCW 74.46.300 on and after January 1, 1985;

             (ii) Postsurvey charges incurred by the facility as a result of subsequent inspections under RCW 18.51.050 which occur beyond the first postsurvey visit during the certification survey calendar year;

             (jj) Compensation paid for any purchased nursing care services, including registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, and nurse assistant services, obtained through service contract arrangement in excess of the amount of compensation paid for such hours of nursing care service had they been paid at the average hourly wage, including related taxes and benefits, for in-house nursing care staff of like classification at the same nursing facility, as reported in the most recent cost report period;

             (kk) For all partial or whole rate periods after July 17, 1984, costs of land and depreciable assets that cannot be reimbursed under the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 and implementing state statutory and regulatory provisions;

             (ll) Costs reported by the contractor for a prior period to the extent such costs, due to statutory exemption, will not be incurred by the contractor in the period to be covered by the rate;

             (mm) Costs of outside activities, for example, costs allocated to the use of a vehicle for personal purposes or related to the part of a facility leased out for office space;

             (nn) Travel expenses outside the states of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington and the province of British Columbia. However, travel to or from the home or central office of a chain organization operating a nursing facility is allowed whether inside or outside these areas if the travel is necessary, ordinary, and related to resident care;

             (oo) Moving expenses of employees in the absence of demonstrated, good-faith effort to recruit within the states of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, and the province of British Columbia;

             (pp) Depreciation in excess of four thousand dollars per year for each passenger car or other vehicle primarily used by the administrator, facility staff, or central office staff;

             (qq) Costs for temporary health care personnel from a nursing pool not registered with the secretary of the department of health;

             (rr) Payroll taxes associated with compensation in excess of allowable compensation of owners, relatives, and administrative personnel;

             (ss) Costs and fees associated with filing a petition for bankruptcy;

             (tt) All advertising or promotional costs, except reasonable costs of help wanted advertising;

             (uu) Outside consultation expenses required to meet department-required minimum data set completion proficiency;

             (vv) Interest charges assessed by any department or agency of this state for failure to make a timely refund of overpayments and interest expenses incurred for loans obtained to make the refunds; and

             (ww) All home office or central office costs, whether on or off the nursing facility premises, and whether allocated or not to specific services, in excess of the median of those costs for all reporting facilities for the most recent report period.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. (1) Effective July 1, 1999, nursing facility medicaid payment rates shall be facility-specific and shall have six components: Direct care, therapy care, support services, operations, property, and return on investment rate. The department shall establish and adjust each of these components, as provided in this section and elsewhere in this chapter, for each medicaid nursing facility in this state.

             (2) All component rates shall be based upon a minimum facility occupancy of eighty-five percent of licensed beds, regardless of how many beds are set up or in use. That portion of a facility's costs associated with or calculated on an occupancy lower than eighty-five percent shall be unallowable.

             (3) Adjustments to direct care, therapy care, support services, and operations component rates for economic trends and conditions shall utilize changes in the nursing home input price index without capital costs published by the health care financing administration of the United States department of health and human services (HCFA index), to be applied as specified in this section. The department is authorized to use alternate indexes as selected by the department if any index specified in this section ceases to be published, is altered or superseded, or if another index is deemed more appropriate by the department.

             (4) Information and data sources used in determining medicaid payment rates, including formulas, procedures, cost report periods, resident assessment instrument formats, resident assessment methodologies, and resident classification and case mix weighting methodologies, may be substituted or altered from time to time as determined by the department.

             (5)(a) Direct care component rates shall be established using adjusted cost report data covering at least six months. Adjusted cost report data from 1996 will be used for July 1, 1998, through June 30, 2001, direct care component rates; adjusted cost report data from 1999 will be used for July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2004, direct care component rates.

             (b) Direct care component rates based on 1996 cost report data shall be adjusted for economic trends and conditions as described in this subsection (5)(b); except that facilities whose direct care component rate, as calculated under section 24 of this act, is greater than the ceiling, as described in section 24(5)(g)(ii) of this act, for July 1, 1998, shall receive an adjustment to the direct care component rate for economic trends and conditions, which is equal to the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1995, to July 1, 1996. For every fiscal year beginning July 1, 1999, and thereafter, facilities whose direct care component rate, as calculated under section 24 of this act, is greater than the ceiling, as described in section 24(5)(g)(ii) of this act, shall receive an adjustment to the direct care component rate for economic trends that is equal to the change in the HCFA index from July 1st of the calendar year two years prior to the adjustment to July 1st of the calendar year one year prior to the adjustment.

             (i) The July 1, 1998, direct care component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1996, to July 1, 1997, multiplied by a factor of one and one-half;

             (ii) The July 1, 1999, direct care component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1997, to July 1, 1998, multiplied by no factor; and

             (iii) The July 1, 2000, direct care component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1998, to July 1, 1999, multiplied by no factor.

             (c) Direct care component rates based on 1999 cost report data shall be adjusted for economic trends and conditions as described in this subsection (5)(c); except that facilities whose direct care component rate, as calculated under section 24 of this act, is greater than the ceiling, as described in section 24(7) of this act, for July 1, 2001, shall receive an adjustment to the direct care component rate for economic trends and conditions, which is equal to the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1999, to July 1, 2000. For every fiscal year beginning July 1, 1999, and thereafter, facilities whose direct care component rate, as calculated under section 24 of this act, is greater than the ceiling, as described in section 24(5)(g)(ii) of this act, shall receive an adjustment to the direct care component rate for economic trends that is equal to the change in the HCFA index from July 1st of the calendar year two years prior to the adjustment to July 1st of the calendar year one year prior to the adjustment:

             (i) The July 1, 2001, direct care component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1999, to July 1, 2000, multiplied by a factor of one and one-half;

             (ii) The July 1, 2002, direct care component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 2000, to July 1, 2001, multiplied by no factor; and

             (iii) The July 1, 2003, direct care component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 2001, to July 1, 2002, multiplied by no factor.

             (6)(a) Therapy care component rates shall be established using adjusted cost report data covering at least six months. Adjusted cost report data from 1996 will be used for July 1, 1998, through June 30, 2001, therapy care component rates; adjusted cost report data from 1999 will be used for July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2004, therapy care component rates.

             (b) Therapy care component rates based on 1996 cost report data shall be adjusted for economic trends and conditions as described in this subsection (6)(b).

             (i) The July 1, 1998, therapy care component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1996, to July 1, 1997, multiplied by a factor of one and one-half;

             (ii) The July 1, 1999, therapy care component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1997, to July 1, 1998, multiplied by no factor; and

             (iii) The July 1, 2000, therapy care component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1998, to July 1, 1999, multiplied by no factor.

             (c) Therapy care component rates based on 1999 cost report data shall be adjusted for economic trends and conditions as follows:

             (i) The July 1, 2001, therapy care component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1999, to July 1, 2000, multiplied by a factor of one and one-half;

             (ii) The July 1, 2002, therapy care component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 2000, to July 1, 2001, multiplied by no factor; and

             (iii) The July 1, 2003, therapy care component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 2001, to July 1, 2002, multiplied by no factor.

             (7)(a) Support services component rates shall be established using adjusted cost report data covering at least six months. Adjusted cost report data from 1996 shall be used for July 1, 1998, through June 30, 2001, support services component rates; adjusted cost report data from 1999 shall be used for July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2004.

             (b) Support services component rates based on 1996 cost report data shall be adjusted for economic trends and conditions as follows:

             (i) The July 1, 1998, support services component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1996, to July 1, 1997, multiplied by a factor of one and one-half;

             (ii) The July 1, 1999, support services component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1997, to July 1, 1998, multiplied by no factor; and

             (iii) The July 1, 2000, support services component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1998, to July 1, 1999, multiplied by no factor.

             (c) Support services component rates based on 1999 cost report data shall be adjusted for economic trends and conditions as follows:

             (i) The July 1, 2001, support services component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1999, to July 1, 2000, multiplied by a factor of one and one-half;

             (ii) The July 1, 2002, support services component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 2000, to July 1, 2001, multiplied by no factor; and

             (iii) The July 1, 2003, support services component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 2001, to July 1, 2002, multiplied by no factor.

             (8)(a) Operations component rates shall be established using adjusted cost report data covering at least six months. Adjusted cost report data from 1996 shall be used for July 1, 1998, through June 30, 2001, operations component rates; adjusted cost report data from 1999 shall be used for July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2004.

             (b) Operations component rates based on 1996 cost report data shall be adjusted for economic trends and conditions as follows:

             (i) The July 1, 1998, operations component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1996, to July 1, 1997, multiplied by a factor of one and one-half;

             (ii) The July 1, 1999, operations component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1997, to July 1, 1998, multiplied by no factor; and

             (iii) The July 1, 2000, operations component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1998, to July 1, 1999, multiplied by no factor.

             (c) Operations component rates based on 1999 cost report data shall be adjusted for economic trends and conditions as follows:

             (i) The July 1, 2001, operations component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 1999, to July 1, 2000, multiplied by a factor of one and one-half;

             (ii) The July 1, 2002, operations component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 2000, to July 1, 2001, multiplied by no factor; and

             (iii) The July 1, 2003, operations component shall be adjusted by the change in the HCFA index from July 1, 2001, to July 1, 2002, multiplied by no factor.

             (9) The property and return on investment component rates shall be rebased annually, with no further adjustments, using adjusted cost report data from the prior calendar year covering at least six months of data.

             (10) Total payment rates under the nursing facility medicaid payment system shall not exceed facility rates charged to the general public for comparable services.

             (11) Medicaid contractors shall pay to all facility staff a minimum wage of the greater of five dollars and fifteen cents per hour or the federal minimum wage.

             (12) The department shall establish in rule procedures, principles, and conditions for determining rates for facilities in circumstances not directly addressed by this chapter, including but not limited to: The need to prorate inflation for partial-period cost report data, newly constructed facilities, existing facilities entering the medicaid program for the first time or after a period of absence from the program, existing facilities with expanded new bed capacity, existing medicaid facilities following a change of ownership of the nursing facility business, facilities banking beds or converting beds back into service, facilities having less than six months of either resident assessment, cost report data, or both, under the current contractor prior to rate setting, and other circumstances.

             (13) The department shall establish in rule procedures, principles, and conditions, including necessary threshold costs, for adjusting rates to reflect capital improvements or new requirements imposed by the department or the federal government.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. The department shall disclose to any member of the public all rate-setting information consistent with requirements of state and federal laws.


             Sec. 20. RCW 74.46.475 and 1985 c 361 s 13 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The department shall analyze the submitted cost report or a portion thereof of each contractor for each report period to determine if the information is correct, complete, ((and)) reported in conformance with department instructions and generally accepted accounting principles, the requirements of this chapter, and such rules ((and regulations)) as the ((secretary)) department may adopt. If the analysis finds that the cost report is incorrect or incomplete, the department may make adjustments to the reported information for purposes of establishing ((reimbursement)) payment rates. A schedule of such adjustments shall be provided to contractors and shall include an explanation for the adjustment and the dollar amount of the adjustment. Adjustments shall be subject to review and appeal as provided in this chapter.

             (2) The department shall accumulate data from properly completed cost reports, in addition to assessment data on each facility's resident population characteristics, for use in:

             (a) Exception profiling; and

             (b) Establishing rates.

             (3) The department may further utilize such accumulated data for analytical, statistical, or informational purposes as necessary.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 21. (1) The department shall employ the resource utilization group III case mix classification methodology. The department shall use the forty-four group index maximizing model for the resource utilization group III grouper version 5.10, but the department may revise or update the classification methodology to reflect advances or refinements in resident assessment or classification, subject to federal requirements.

             (2) A default case mix group shall be established for cases in which the resident dies or is discharged for any purpose prior to completion of the resident's initial assessment. The default case mix group and case mix weight for these cases shall be designated by the department.

             (3) A default case mix group may also be established for cases in which there is an untimely assessment for the resident. The default case mix group and case mix weight for these cases shall be designated by the department.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 22. (1) Each case mix classification group shall be assigned a case mix weight. The case mix weight for each resident of a nursing facility for each calendar quarter shall be based on data from resident assessment instruments completed for the resident and weighted by the number of days the resident was in each case mix classification group. Days shall be counted as provided in this section.

             (2) The case mix weights shall be based on the average minutes per registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, and certified nurse aide, for each case mix group, and using the health care financing administration of the United States department of health and human services 1995 nursing facility staff time measurement study stemming from its multistate nursing home case mix and quality demonstration project. Those minutes shall be weighted by state-wide ratios of registered nurse to certified nurse aide, and licensed practical nurse to certified nurse aide, wages, including salaries and benefits, which shall be based on 1995 cost report data for this state.

             (3) The case mix weights shall be determined as follows:

             (a) Set the certified nurse aide wage weight at 1.000 and calculate wage weights for registered nurse and licensed practical nurse average wages by dividing the certified nurse aide average wage into the registered nurse average wage and licensed practical nurse average wage;

             (b) Calculate the total weighted minutes for each case mix group in the resource utilization group III classification system by multiplying the wage weight for each worker classification by the average number of minutes that classification of worker spends caring for a resident in that resource utilization group III classification group, and summing the products;

             (c) Assign a case mix weight of 1.000 to the resource utilization group III classification group with the lowest total weighted minutes and calculate case mix weights by dividing the lowest group's total weighted minutes into each group's total weighted minutes and rounding weight calculations to the third decimal place.

             (4) The case mix weights in this state may be revised if the health care financing administration updates its nursing facility staff time measurement studies. The case mix weights shall be revised, but only when direct care component rates are cost-rebased as provided in subsection (5) of this section, to be effective on the July 1st effective date of each cost-rebased direct care component rate. However, the department may revise case mix weights more frequently if, and only if, significant variances in wage ratios occur among direct care staff in the different caregiver classifications identified in this section.

             (5) Case mix weights shall be revised when direct care component rates are cost-rebased every three years as provided in section 18(5)(a) of this act.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 23. (1) From individual case mix weights for the applicable quarter, the department shall determine two average case mix indexes for each medicaid nursing facility, one for all residents in the facility, known as the facility average case mix index, and one for medicaid residents, known as the medicaid average case mix index.

             (2)(a) In calculating a facility's two average case mix indexes for each quarter, the department shall include all residents or medicaid residents, as applicable, who were physically in the facility during the quarter in question (January 1st through March 31st, April 1st through June 30th, July 1st through September 30th, or October 1st through December 31st).

             (b) The facility average case mix index shall exclude all default cases as defined in this chapter. However, the medicaid average case mix index shall include all default cases.

             (3) Both the facility average and the medicaid average case mix indexes shall be determined by multiplying the case mix weight of each resident, or each medicaid resident, as applicable, by the number of days, as defined in this section and as applicable, the resident was at each particular case mix classification or group, and then averaging.

             (4)(a) In determining the number of days a resident is classified into a particular case mix group, the department shall determine a start date for calculating case mix grouping periods as follows:

             (i) If a resident's initial assessment for a first stay or a return stay in the nursing facility is timely completed and transmitted to the department by the cutoff date under state and federal requirements and as described in subsection (5) of this section, the start date shall be the later of either the first day of the quarter or the resident's facility admission or readmission date;

             (ii) If a resident's significant change, quarterly, or annual assessment is timely completed and transmitted to the department by the cutoff date under state and federal requirements and as described in subsection (5) of this section, the start date shall be the date the assessment is completed;

             (iii) If a resident's significant change, quarterly, or annual assessment is not timely completed and transmitted to the department by the cutoff date under state and federal requirements and as described in subsection (5) of this section, the start date shall be the due date for the assessment.

             (b) If state or federal rules require more frequent assessment, the same principles for determining the start date of a resident's classification in a particular case mix group set forth in subsection (4)(a) of this section shall apply.

             (c) In calculating the number of days a resident is classified into a particular case mix group, the department shall determine an end date for calculating case mix grouping periods as follows:

             (i) If a resident is discharged before the end of the applicable quarter, the end date shall be the day before discharge;

             (ii) If a resident is not discharged before the end of the applicable quarter, the end date shall be the last day of the quarter;

             (iii) If a new assessment is due for a resident or a new assessment is completed and transmitted to the department, the end date of the previous assessment shall be the earlier of either the day before the assessment is due or the day before the assessment is completed by the nursing facility.

             (5) The cutoff date for the department to use resident assessment data, for the purposes of calculating both the facility average and the medicaid average case mix indexes, and for establishing and updating a facility's direct care component rate, shall be one month and one day after the end of the quarter for which the resident assessment data applies.

             (6) A threshold of ninety percent, as described and calculated in this subsection, shall be used to determine the case mix index each quarter. The threshold shall also be used to determine which facilities' costs per case mix unit are included in determining the ceiling, floor, and price. If the facility does not meet the ninety percent threshold, the department may use an alternate case mix index to determine the facility average and medicaid average case mix indexes for the quarter. The threshold is a count of unique minimum data set assessments, and it shall include resident assessment instrument tracking forms for residents discharged prior to completing an initial assessment. The threshold is calculated by dividing the count of unique minimum data set assessments by the average census for each facility. A daily census shall be reported by each nursing facility as it transmits assessment data to the department. The department shall compute a quarterly average census based on the daily census. If no census has been reported by a facility during a specified quarter, then the department shall use the facility's licensed beds as the denominator in computing the threshold.

             (7)(a) Although the facility average and the medicaid average case mix indexes shall both be calculated quarterly, the facility average case mix index will be used only every three years in combination with cost report data as specified by this section, to establish a facility's allowable cost per case mix unit. A facility's medicaid average case mix index shall be used to update a nursing facility's direct care component rate quarterly.

             (b) The facility average case mix index used to establish each nursing facility's direct care component rate shall be based on an average of calendar quarters of the facility's average case mix indexes.

             (i) For July 1, 1998, direct care component rates, the department shall use an average of facility average case mix indexes from the four calendar quarters of 1997.

             (ii) For July 1, 2000, direct care component rates, the department shall use an average of facility average case mix indexes from the four calendar quarters of 1998.

             (c) The medicaid average case mix index used to update or recalibrate a nursing facility's direct care component rate quarterly shall be from the calendar quarter commencing six months prior to the effective date of the quarterly rate. For example, July 1, 1998, through September 30, 1998, direct care component rates shall use medicaid case mix averages from the January 1, 1998, through March 31, 1999, calendar quarter; October 1, 1998, through December 31, 1998, direct care component rates shall utilize case mix averages from the April 1, 1998, through June 30, 1998, calendar quarter, and so forth.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 24. (1) The direct care component rate corresponds to the provision of nursing care for one resident of a nursing facility for one day, including direct care supplies. Therapy services and supplies, which correspond to the therapy care component rate, shall be excluded. The direct care component rate includes elements of case mix determined consistent with the principles of this section and other applicable provisions of this chapter.

             (2) Beginning July 1, 1998, the department shall determine and update quarterly for each nursing facility serving medicaid residents a facility-specific per-resident day direct care component rate, to be effective on the first day of each calendar quarter. In determining direct care component rates the department shall utilize, as specified in this section, minimum data set resident assessment data for each resident of the facility, as transmitted to, and if necessary corrected by, the department in the resident assessment instrument format approved by federal authorities for use in this state.

             (3) The department may question the accuracy of assessment data for any resident and utilize corrected or substitute information, however derived, in determining direct care component rates. The department is authorized to impose civil fines and to take adverse rate actions against a contractor, as specified by the department in rule, in order to obtain compliance with resident assessment and data transmission requirements and to ensure accuracy.

             (4) Cost report data used in setting direct care component rates shall be 1996 and 1999, for rate periods as specified in section 18(5)(a) of this act.

             (5) Beginning July 1, 1998, the department shall rebase each nursing facility's direct care component rate as described in section 18 of this act, adjust its direct care component rate for economic trends and conditions as described in section 18 of this act, and update its medicaid average case mix index, consistent with the following:

             (a) Reduce total direct care costs reported by each nursing facility for the applicable cost report period specified in section 18(5)(a) of this act to reflect any department adjustments, and to eliminate reported resident therapy costs and adjustments, in order to derive the facility's total allowable direct care cost;

             (b) Divide each facility's total allowable direct care cost by its adjusted resident days for the same report period, increased if necessary to a minimum occupancy of eighty-five percent; that is, the greater of actual or imputed occupancy at eighty-five percent of licensed beds, to derive the facility's allowable direct care cost per resident day;

             (c) Adjust the facility's per resident day direct care cost by the applicable factor specified in section 18(5) (b) and (c) of this act to derive its adjusted allowable direct care cost per resident day;

             (d) Divide each facility's adjusted allowable direct care cost per resident day by the facility average case mix index for the applicable quarters specified by section 23(7)(b) of this act to derive the facility's allowable direct care cost per case mix unit;

             (e) Divide nursing facilities into two peer groups: Those located in metropolitan statistical areas as determined and defined by the United States office of management and budget or other appropriate agency or office of the federal government, and those not located in a metropolitan statistical area;

             (f) Array separately the allowable direct care cost per case mix unit for all metropolitan statistical area and for all nonmetropolitan statistical area facilities, and determine the median allowable direct care cost per case mix unit for each peer group;

             (g) Determine each facility's allowable direct care cost per case mix unit. For July 1, 1998, through June 30, 2000, direct care component rates:

             (i) A facility's direct care cost per case mix unit shall not be set below the floor of eighty-five percent of the facility's metropolitan statistical area or nonmetropolitan statistical area peer group median cost per case mix unit;

             (ii) A facility's direct care cost per case mix unit shall not be set above the ceiling of one hundred fifteen percent of the facility's metropolitan statistical area or nonmetropolitan statistical area peer group median cost per case mix unit. Except that for those facilities whose cost per case mix unit is above the ceiling described in (g)(ii) of this subsection, the direct care component rate shall be set equal to the nursing services component rate in effect on June 30, 1998, in accordance with RCW 74.46.481 as it existed prior to the effective date of this section, less therapy costs, plus any exceptional care offsets as reported on the cost report, adjusted for economic trends and conditions as described in section 18 of this act; and after June 30, 1999, shall be set equal to the direct care component rate in effect at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal year, adjusted for economic trends and conditions as described in section 18 of this act;

             (h) Multiply each nursing facility's allowable direct care cost per case mix unit by that facility's medicaid average case mix index from the applicable quarter specified by section 23(7)(c) of this act to arrive at the facility's quarterly direct care component rate.

             (6) For July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2002, direct care component rates, for metropolitan statistical area and nonmetropolitan statistical area facilities, the ceiling for each facility within each peer group shall be one hundred ten percent of the peer group's median allowable direct care cost per case mix unit, and the floor shall be ninety percent of the peer groups' median allowable direct care cost per case mix unit; except that for those facilities whose cost per case mix unit is above the ceiling described in this subsection (6), the direct care component rate shall be set equal to the nursing services component rate in effect at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal year, adjusted for economic trends and conditions as described in section 18 of this act.

             (7) For July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2004, direct care component rates, for metropolitan statistical area and nonmetropolitan statistical area facilities, the ceiling for each facility within each peer group shall be one hundred five percent of the peer group's median allowable direct care cost per case mix unit, and the floor shall be ninety-five percent of the peer group's median allowable direct care cost per case mix unit; except that for those facilities whose cost per case mix unit is above the ceiling described in this subsection (7), the direct care component rate shall be set equal to the nursing services component rate in effect at the end of the immediately preceding fiscal year, adjusted for economic trends and conditions as described by section 18 of this act.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 25. (1) The therapy care component rate corresponds to the provision of medicaid one-on-one therapy provided by a qualified therapist as defined in this chapter, including therapy supplies and therapy consultation, for one day for one medicaid resident of a nursing facility. The therapy care component rate for July 1, 1998, through June 30, 2001, shall be based on adjusted therapy costs and days from calendar year 1996. The therapy component rate for July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2004, shall be based on adjusted therapy costs and days from calendar year 1999. The therapy care component rate shall be adjusted for economic trends and conditions as specified in section 18(6)(b) of this act, and shall be determined in accordance with this section.

             (2) In rebasing, as provided in section 18(6)(a) of this act, the department shall take from the cost reports of facilities the following reported information:

             (a) Direct one-on-one therapy charges for all residents by payer including charges for supplies;

             (b) The total units or modules of therapy care for all residents by type of therapy provided, for example, speech or physical. A unit or module of therapy care is considered to be fifteen minutes of one-on-one therapy provided by a qualified therapist or support personnel; and

             (c) Therapy consulting expenses for all residents.

             (3) The department shall determine for all residents the total cost per unit of therapy for each type of therapy by dividing the total adjusted one-on-one therapy expense for each type by the total units provided for that therapy type.

             (4) The department shall divide medicaid nursing facilities in this state into two peer groups:

             (a) Those facilities located within a metropolitan statistical area; and

             (b) Those not located in a metropolitan statistical area.

             Metropolitan statistical areas and nonmetropolitan statistical areas shall be as determined by the United States office of management and budget or other applicable federal office. The department shall array the facilities in each peer group from highest to lowest based on their total cost per unit of therapy for each therapy type. The department shall determine the median total cost per unit of therapy for each therapy type and add ten percent of median total cost per unit of therapy. The cost per unit of therapy for each therapy type at a nursing facility shall be the lesser of its cost per unit of therapy for each therapy type or the median total cost per unit plus ten percent for each therapy type for its peer group.

             (5) The department shall calculate each nursing facility's therapy care component rate as follows:

             (a) To determine the allowable total therapy cost for each therapy type, the allowable cost per unit of therapy for each type of therapy shall be multiplied by the total therapy units for each type of therapy;

             (b) The medicaid allowable one-on-one therapy expense shall be calculated taking the allowable total therapy cost for each therapy type times the medicaid percent of total therapy charges for each therapy type;

             (c) The medicaid allowable one-on-one therapy expense for each therapy type shall be divided by total adjusted medicaid days to arrive at the medicaid one-on-one therapy cost per patient day for each therapy type;

             (d) The medicaid one-on-one therapy cost per patient day for each therapy type shall be multiplied by total adjusted patient days for all residents to calculate the total allowable one-on-one therapy expense. The lesser of the total allowable therapy consultant expense for the therapy type or a reasonable percentage of allowable therapy consultant expense for each therapy type, as established in rule by the department, shall be added to the total allowable one-on-one therapy expense to determine the allowable therapy cost for each therapy type;

             (e) The allowable therapy cost for each therapy type shall be added together, the sum of which shall be the total allowable therapy expense for the nursing facility;

             (f) The total allowable therapy expense will be divided by the greater of adjusted total patient days from the cost report on which the therapy expenses were reported, or patient days at eighty-five percent occupancy of licensed beds. The outcome shall be the nursing facility's therapy care component rate.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 26. (1) The support services component rate corresponds to the provision of food, food preparation, dietary, housekeeping, and laundry services for one resident for one day.

             (2) Beginning July 1, 1998, the department shall determine each medicaid nursing facility's support services component rate using cost report data specified by section 18(7) of this act.

             (3) To determine each facility's support services component rate, the department shall:

             (a) Array facilities' adjusted support services costs per adjusted resident day for each facility from facilities' cost reports from the applicable report year, for facilities located within a metropolitan statistical area, and for those not located in any metropolitan statistical area and determine the median adjusted cost for each peer group;

             (b) Set each facility's support services component rate at the lower of the facility's per resident day adjusted support services costs from the applicable cost report period or the adjusted median per resident day support services cost for that facility's peer group, either metropolitan statistical area or nonmetropolitan statistical area, plus ten percent; and

             (c) Adjust each facility's support services component rate for economic trends and conditions as provided in section 18(7) of this act.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 27. (1) The operations component rate corresponds to the general operation of a nursing facility for one resident for one day, including but not limited to management, administration, utilities, office supplies, accounting and bookkeeping, minor building maintenance, minor equipment repairs and replacements, and other supplies and services, exclusive of direct care, therapy care, support services, and capital return.

             (2) Beginning July 1, 1998, the department shall determine each medicaid nursing facility's operations component rate using cost report data specified by section 18(8)(a) of this act.

             (3) To determine each facility's operations component rate the department shall:

             (a) Array facilities' adjusted general operations costs per adjusted resident day for each facility from facilities' cost reports from the applicable report year, for facilities located within a metropolitan statistical area and for those not located in a metropolitan statistical area and determine the median adjusted cost for each peer group;

             (b) Set each facility's operations component rate at the lower of the facility's per resident day adjusted operations costs from the applicable cost report period or the adjusted median per resident day general operations cost for that facility's peer group, metropolitan statistical area or nonmetropolitan statistical area; and

             (c) Adjust each facility's operations component rate for economic trends and conditions as provided in section 18(8)(b) of this act.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 28. (1) The property cost center rate for each facility shall be determined by dividing the sum of the reported allowable prior period actual depreciation, subject to RCW 74.46.310 through 74.46.380, adjusted for any capitalized additions or replacements approved by the department, and the retained savings from such cost center, by the greater of a facility's total resident days for the facility in the prior period or resident days as calculated on ninety or eighty-five percent facility occupancy as applicable. If a capitalized addition or retirement of an asset will result in a different licensed bed capacity during the ensuing period, the prior period total resident days used in computing the property cost center rate shall be adjusted to anticipated resident day level.

             (2) A nursing facility's property rate shall be rebased annually, effective July 1st, in accordance with this section and this chapter.

             (3) When a certificate of need for a new facility is requested, the department, in reaching its decision, shall take into consideration per-bed land and building construction costs for the facility which shall not exceed a maximum to be established by the secretary.

             (4) For the purpose of calculating a nursing facility's property component rate, if a contractor elects to bank licensed beds or to convert banked beds to active service, under chapter 70.38 RCW, the department shall use the facility's anticipated resident occupancy level subsequent to the decrease or increase in licensed bed capacity. However, in no case shall the department use less than ninety percent occupancy of the facility's licensed bed capacity after banking or conversion.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 29. (1) The department shall establish for each medicaid nursing facility a return on investment rate composed of two parts: A financing allowance and a variable return allowance. The financing allowance part of a facility's return on investment component rate shall be rebased annually, effective July 1st, in accordance with the provisions of this section and this chapter.

             (a) The financing allowance shall be determined by multiplying the net invested funds of each facility by .085, and dividing by the greater of a nursing facility's total resident days from the most recent cost report period or resident days calculated on ninety percent or eighty-five percent facility occupancy as applicable. If a capitalized addition or retirement of an asset will result in a different licensed bed capacity during the ensuing period, the prior period total resident days used in computing the financing and variable return allowances shall be adjusted to the anticipated resident day level.

             (b) In computing the portion of net invested funds representing the net book value of tangible fixed assets, the same assets, depreciation bases, lives, and methods referred to in RCW 74.46.330, 74.46.350, 74.46.360, 74.46.370, and 74.46.380, including owned and leased assets, shall be utilized, except that the capitalized cost of land upon which the facility is located and such other contiguous land which is reasonable and necessary for use in the regular course of providing resident care shall also be included. Subject to provisions and limitations contained in this chapter, for land purchased by owners or lessors before July 18, 1984, capitalized cost of land shall be the buyer's capitalized cost. For all partial or whole rate periods after July 17, 1984, if the land is purchased after July 17, 1984, capitalized cost shall be that of the owner of record on July 17, 1984, or buyer's capitalized cost, whichever is lower. In the case of leased facilities where the net invested funds are unknown or the contractor is unable to provide necessary information to determine net invested funds, the secretary shall have the authority to determine an amount for net invested funds based on an appraisal conducted according to RCW 74.46.360(1).

             (c) In determining the variable return allowance:

             (i) For all rate setting periods beginning July 1st, the department, without utilizing peer groups, shall first rank all facilities in numerical order from highest to lowest according to their per resident day adjusted or audited, or both, allowable costs for nursing services, food, administrative, and operational costs combined for the 1994 calendar year cost report period.

             (ii) The department shall then compute the variable return allowance by multiplying the appropriate percentage amounts, which shall not be less than one percent and not greater than four percent, by the sum of the facility's nursing services, food, administrative, and operational rate components. The percentage amounts will be based on groupings of facilities according to the rankings prescribed in (c)(i) of this subsection. The percentages calculated and assigned will remain the same for the variable return allowance paid in all July 1, 1996, and July 1, 1997, rates as well. Those groups of facilities with lower per diem costs shall receive higher percentage amounts than those with higher per diem costs.

             (d) The sum of the financing allowance and the variable return allowance shall be the return on investment rate for each facility, and shall be added to the prospective rates of each contractor as determined in sections 18 through 27 of this act.

             (e) In the case of a facility that was leased by the contractor as of January 1, 1980, in an arm's-length agreement, which continues to be leased under the same lease agreement, and for which the annualized lease payment, plus any interest and depreciation expenses associated with contractor-owned assets, for the period covered by the prospective rates, divided by the contractor's total resident days, minus the property cost center determined according to section 28 of this act, is more than the return on investment rate determined according to (d) of this subsection, the following shall apply:

             (i) The financing allowance shall be recomputed substituting the fair market value of the assets as of January 1, 1982, as determined by the department of general administration through an appraisal procedure, less accumulated depreciation on the lessor's assets since January 1, 1982, for the net book value of the assets in determining net invested funds for the facility. A determination by the department of general administration of fair market value shall be final unless the procedure used to make such a determination is shown to be arbitrary and capricious.

             (ii) The sum of the financing allowance computed under (e)(i) of this subsection and the variable allowance shall be compared to the annualized lease payment, plus any interest and depreciation associated with contractor-owned assets, for the period covered by the prospective rates, divided by the contractor's total resident days, minus the property cost center rate determined according to section 28 of this act. The lesser of the two amounts shall be called the alternate return on investment rate.

             (iii) The return on investment rate determined according to (d) of this subsection or the alternate return on investment rate, whichever is greater, shall be the return on investment rate for the facility and shall be added to the prospective rates of the contractor as determined in sections 18 through 27 of this act.

             (f) In the case of a facility that was leased by the contractor as of January 1, 1980, in an arm's-length agreement, if the lease is renewed or extended under a provision of the lease, the treatment provided in (e) of this subsection shall be applied, except that in the case of renewals or extensions made subsequent to April 1, 1985, reimbursement for the annualized lease payment shall be no greater than the reimbursement for the annualized lease payment for the last year prior to the renewal or extension of the lease.

             (2) For the purpose of calculating a nursing facility's return on investment component rate, if a contractor elects to bank beds or to convert banked beds to active service, under chapter 70.38 RCW, the department shall use the facility's anticipated resident occupancy level subsequent to the decrease or increase in licensed bed capacity. However, in no case shall the department use less than ninety percent occupancy of the facility's licensed bed capacity after banking or conversion.

             (3) Each biennium the secretary shall review the adequacy of return on investment rates in relation to anticipated requirements for maintaining, reducing, or expanding nursing care capacity. The secretary shall report the results of a such review to the legislature and make recommendations for adjustments in the return on investment rates utilized in this section, if appropriate.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 30. (1) The department may adjust component rates for errors or omissions made in establishing component rates and determine amounts either overpaid to the contractor or underpaid by the department.

             (2) A contractor may request the department to adjust its component rates because of:

             (a) An error or omission the contractor made in completing a cost report; or

             (b) An alleged error or omission made by the department in determining one or more of the contractor's component rates.

             (3) A request for a rate adjustment made on incorrect cost reporting must be accompanied by the amended cost report pages prepared in accordance with the department's written instructions and by a written explanation of the error or omission and the necessity for the amended cost report pages and the rate adjustment.

             (4) The department shall review a contractor's request for a rate adjustment because of an alleged error or omission, even if the time period has expired in which the contractor must appeal the rate when initially issued, pursuant to rules adopted by the department under RCW 74.46.780. If the request is received after this time period, the department has the authority to correct the rate if it agrees an error or omission was committed. However, if the request is denied, the contractor shall not be entitled to any appeals or exception review procedure that the department may adopt under RCW 74.46.780.

             (5) The department shall notify the contractor of the amount of the overpayment to be recovered or additional payment to be made to the contractor reflecting a rate adjustment to correct an error or omission. The recovery from the contractor of the overpayment or the additional payment to the contractor shall be governed by the reconciliation, settlement, security, and recovery processes set forth in this chapter and by rules adopted by the department in accordance with this chapter and RCW 74.46.800.


             Sec. 31. RCW 74.46.610 and 1983 1st ex.s. c 67 s 33 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) A contractor shall bill the department each month by completing and returning a facility billing statement as provided by the department ((which shall include, but not be limited to:

             (a) Billing by cost center;

             (b) Total patient days; and

             (c) Patient days for medical care recipients)).

             The statement shall be completed and filed in accordance with rules ((and regulations)) established by the ((secretary)) department.

             (2) A facility shall not bill the department for service provided to a recipient until an award letter of eligibility of such recipient under rules established under chapter 74.09 RCW has been received by the facility. However a facility may bill and shall be reimbursed for all medical care recipients referred to the facility by the department prior to the receipt of the award letter of eligibility or the denial of such eligibility.

             (3) Billing shall cover the patient days of care.


             Sec. 32. RCW 74.46.620 and 1980 c 177 s 62 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The department will ((reimburse)) pay a contractor for service rendered under the facility contract and billed in accordance with RCW 74.46.610.

             (2) The amount paid will be computed using the appropriate rates assigned to the contractor.

             (3) For each recipient, the department will pay an amount equal to the appropriate rates, multiplied by the number of ((patient)) medicaid resident days each rate was in effect, less the amount the recipient is required to pay for his or her care as set forth by RCW 74.46.630.


             Sec. 33. RCW 74.46.630 and 1980 c 177 s 63 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The department will notify a contractor of the amount each medical care recipient is required to pay for care provided under the contract and the effective date of such required contribution. It is the contractor's responsibility to collect that portion of the cost of care from the patient, and to account for any authorized reduction from his or her contribution in accordance with rules ((and regulations)) established by the ((secretary)) department.

             (2) If a contractor receives documentation showing a change in the income or resources of a recipient which will mean a change in his or her contribution toward the cost of care, this shall be reported in writing to the department within seventy-two hours and in a manner specified by rules ((and regulations)) established by the ((secretary)) department. If necessary, appropriate corrections will be made in the next facility statement, and a copy of documentation supporting the change will be attached. If increased funds for a recipient are received by a contractor, an amount determined by the department shall be allowed for clothing and personal and incidental expense, and the balance applied to the cost of care.

             (3) The contractor shall accept the ((reimbursement)) payment rates established by the department as full compensation for all services provided under the contract, certification as specified by Title XIX, and licensure under chapter 18.51 RCW. The contractor shall not seek or accept additional compensation from or on behalf of a recipient for any or all such services.


             Sec. 34. RCW 74.46.640 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 112 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) Payments to a contractor may be withheld by the department in each of the following circumstances:

             (a) A required report is not properly completed and filed by the contractor within the appropriate time period, including any approved extension. Payments will be released as soon as a properly completed report is received;

             (b) State auditors, department auditors, or authorized personnel in the course of their duties are refused access to a nursing facility or are not provided with existing appropriate records. Payments will be released as soon as such access or records are provided;

             (c) A refund in connection with a ((preliminary or final)) settlement or rate adjustment is not paid by the contractor when due. The amount withheld will be limited to the unpaid amount of the refund and any accumulated interest owed to the department as authorized by this chapter;

             (d) Payment for the final sixty days of service under a contract will be held in the absence of adequate alternate security acceptable to the department pending ((final)) settlement of all periods when the contract is terminated; and

             (e) Payment for services at any time during the contract period in the absence of adequate alternate security acceptable to the department, if a contractor's net medicaid overpayment liability for one or more nursing facilities or other debt to the department, as determined by ((preliminary settlement, final)) settlement, civil fines imposed by the department, third-party liabilities or other source, reaches or exceeds fifty thousand dollars, whether subject to good faith dispute or not, and for each subsequent increase in liability reaching or exceeding twenty-five thousand dollars. Payments will be released as soon as practicable after acceptable security is provided or refund to the department is made.

             (2) No payment will be withheld until written notification of the suspension is provided to the contractor, stating the reason for the withholding, except that neither a timely filed request to pursue ((the)) any administrative appeals or exception procedure that the department may establish((ed)) by ((the department in)) rule nor commencement of judicial review, as may be available to the contractor in law, shall delay suspension of payment.


             Sec. 35. RCW 74.46.650 and 1980 c 177 s 65 are each amended to read as follows:

             All payments to a contractor will end no later than sixty days after any of the following occurs:

             (1) A contract ((expires,)) is terminated ((or is not renewed));

             (2) A facility license is revoked; or

             (3) A facility is decertified as a Title XIX facility; except that, in situations where the ((secretary)) department determines that residents must remain in such facility for a longer period because of the resident's health or safety, payments for such residents shall continue.


             Sec. 36. RCW 74.46.660 and 1992 c 215 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

             In order to participate in the ((prospective cost-related reimbursement)) nursing facility medicaid payment system established by this chapter, the person or legal ((organization)) entity responsible for operation of a facility shall:

             (1) Obtain a state certificate of need and/or federal capital expenditure review (section 1122) approval pursuant to chapter 70.38 RCW and Part 100, Title 42 CFR where required;

             (2) Hold the appropriate current license;

             (3) Hold current Title XIX certification;

             (4) Hold a current contract to provide services under this chapter;

             (5) Comply with all provisions of the contract and all ((application)) applicable regulations, including but not limited to the provisions of this chapter; and

             (6) Obtain and maintain medicare certification, under Title XVIII of the social security act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1395, as amended, for a portion of the facility's licensed beds. ((Until June 1, 1993, the department may grant exemptions from the medicare certification requirements of this subsection to nursing facilities that are making good faith efforts to obtain medicare certification.))


             Sec. 37. RCW 74.46.680 and 1985 c 361 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) On the effective date of a change of ownership the department's contract with the old owner shall be terminated. The old owner shall give the department sixty days' written notice of such termination. When certificate of need and/or section 1122 approval is required pursuant to chapter 70.38 RCW and Part 100, Title 42 CFR, for the new owner to acquire the facility, and the new owner wishes to continue to provide service to recipients without interruption, certificate of need and/or section 1122 approval shall be obtained before the old owner submits a notice of termination.

             (2) If the new owner desires to participate in the ((cost-related reimbursement)) nursing facility medicaid payment system, it shall meet the conditions specified in RCW 74.46.660 ((and shall submit a projected budget in accordance with RCW 74.46.670 no later than sixty days before the date of the change of ownership)). The facility contract with the new owner shall be effective as of the date of the change of ownership.


             Sec. 38. RCW 74.46.690 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 113 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) When a facility contract is terminated for any reason, ((the old contractor shall submit)) final reports shall be submitted as required by RCW 74.46.040.

             (2) Upon notification of a contract termination, the department shall determine by ((preliminary or final settlement calculations)) settlement or reconciliation the amount of any overpayments made to the contractor, including overpayments disputed by the contractor. If ((preliminary or final)) settlements are unavailable for any period up to the date of contract termination, the department shall make a reasonable estimate of any overpayment or underpayments for such periods. The reasonable estimate shall be based upon prior period settlements, available audit findings, the projected impact of prospective rates, and other information available to the department. The department shall also determine and add in the total of all other debts and potential debts owed to the department regardless of source, including, but not limited to, interest owed to the department as authorized by this chapter, civil fines imposed by the department, or third-party liabilities.

             (3) The old contractor shall provide security, in a form deemed adequate by the department, equal to the total amount of determined and estimated overpayments and all ((other)) debts and potential debts from any source, whether or not the overpayments are the subject of good faith dispute including but not limited to, interest owed to the department, civil fines imposed by the department, and third-party liabilities. Security shall consist of one or more of the following:

             (a) Withheld payments due the old contractor under the contract being terminated; ((or))

             (b) ((A surety bond issued by a bonding company acceptable to the department; or

             (c))) An assignment of funds to the department; ((or

             (d) Collateral acceptable to the department; or

             (e) A purchaser's)) (c) The new contractor's assumption of liability for the prior contractor's ((overpayment)) debt or potential debt;

             (d) An authorization to withhold payments from one or more medicaid nursing facilities that continue to be operated by the old contractor;

             (((f))) (e) A promissory note secured by a deed of trust; or

             (((g) Any combination of (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), or (f) of this subsection)) (f) Other collateral or security acceptable to the department.

             (4) ((A surety bond or)) An assignment of funds shall:

             (a) Be at least equal ((in)) to the amount ((to)) of determined or estimated ((overpayments, whether or not the subject of good faith dispute,)) debt or potential debt minus withheld payments or other security provided; and

             (b) ((Be issued or accepted by a bonding company or financial institution licensed to transact business in Washington state;

             (c) Be for a term, as determined by the department, sufficient to ensure effectiveness after final settlement and the exhaustion of any administrative appeals or exception procedure and judicial remedies, as may be available to and sought by the contractor, regarding payment, settlement, civil fine, interest assessment, or other debt issues: PROVIDED, That the bond or assignment shall initially be for a term of at least five years, and shall be forfeited if not renewed thereafter in an amount equal to any remaining combined overpayment and debt liability as determined by the department;

             (d) Provide that the full amount of the bond or assignment, or both, shall be paid to the department if a properly completed final cost report is not filed in accordance with this chapter, or if financial records supporting this report are not preserved and made available to the auditor; and

             (e))) Provide that an amount equal to any recovery the department determines is due from the contractor from settlement or from any ((other)) source of debt to the department, but not exceeding the amount of the ((bond and)) assignment, shall be paid to the department if the contractor does not pay the ((refund and)) debt within sixty days following receipt of written demand for payment from the department to the contractor.

             (5) The department shall release any payment withheld as security if alternate security is provided under subsection (3) of this section in an amount equivalent to the determined and estimated ((overpayments)) debt.

             (6) If the total of withheld payments((, bonds,)) and assignments is less than the total of determined and estimated overpayments and debts, the unsecured amount of ((such)) the overpayments and the debt shall be a debt due the state and shall become a lien against the real and personal property of the contractor from the time of filing by the department with the county auditor of the county where the contractor resides or owns property, and the lien claim has preference over the claims of all unsecured creditors.

             (7) ((The contractor shall file)) A properly completed final cost report shall be filed in accordance with the requirements of ((this chapter)) RCW 74.46.040, which shall be ((audited)) examined by the department in accordance with the requirements of RCW 74.46.100. ((A final settlement shall be determined within ninety days following completion of the audit process, including completion of any administrative appeals or exception procedure review of the audit requested by the contractor, but not including completion of any judicial review available to and commenced by the contractor.))

             (8) ((Following determination of settlement for all periods,)) Security held pursuant to this section shall be released to the contractor after all ((overpayments, erroneous payments, and)) debts ((determined in connection with final settlement, or otherwise)), including accumulated interest owed the department, have been paid by the old contractor.

             (9) If, after calculation of settlements for any periods, it is determined that overpayments exist in excess of the value of security held by the state, the department may seek recovery of these additional overpayments as provided by law.

             (10) Regardless of whether a contractor intends to terminate its medicaid contracts, if a contractor's net medicaid overpayments and erroneous payments for one or more settlement periods, and for one or more nursing facilities, combined with debts due the department, reaches or exceeds a total of fifty thousand dollars, as determined by ((preliminary settlement, final)) settlement, civil fines imposed by the department, third-party liabilities or by any other source, whether such amounts are subject to good faith dispute or not, the department shall demand and obtain security equivalent to the total of such overpayments, erroneous payments, and debts and shall obtain security for each subsequent increase in liability reaching or exceeding twenty-five thousand dollars. Such security shall meet the criteria in subsections (3) and (4) of this section, except that the department shall not accept an assumption of liability. The department shall withhold all or portions of a contractor's current contract payments or impose liens, or both, if security acceptable to the department is not forthcoming. The department shall release a contractor's withheld payments or lift liens, or both, if the contractor subsequently provides security acceptable to the department. ((This subsection shall apply to all overpayments and erroneous payments determined by preliminary or final settlements issued on or after July 1, 1995, regardless of what payment periods the settlements may cover and shall apply to all debts owed the department from any source, including interest debts, which become due on or after July 1, 1995.))


             Sec. 39. RCW 74.46.770 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 114 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) ((For all nursing facility medicaid payment rates effective on or after July 1, 1995, and for all settlements and audits issued on or after July 1, 1995, regardless of what periods the settlements or audits may cover,)) If a contractor wishes to contest the way in which a rule relating to the medicaid payment ((rate)) system was applied to the contractor by the department, it shall pursue ((the)) any appeals or exception procedure ((established by)) that the department may establish in rule authorized by RCW 74.46.780.

             (2) If a contractor wishes to challenge the legal validity of a statute, rule, or contract provision or wishes to bring a challenge based in whole or in part on federal law, ((including but not limited to issues of procedural or substantive compliance with the federal medicaid minimum payment standard for long-term care facility services, the)) any appeals or exception procedure ((established by)) that the department may establish in rule may not be used for these purposes. This prohibition shall apply regardless of whether the contractor wishes to obtain a decision or ruling on an issue of validity or federal compliance or wishes only to make a record for the purpose of subsequent judicial review.

             (3) If a contractor wishes to challenge the legal validity of a statute, rule, or contract provision relating to the medicaid payment rate system, or wishes to bring a challenge based in whole or in part on federal law, it must bring such action de novo in a court of proper jurisdiction as may be provided by law.


             Sec. 40. RCW 74.46.780 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 115 are each amended to read as follows:

             ((For all nursing facility medicaid payment rates effective on or after July 1, 1995, and for all audits completed and settlements issued on or after July 1, 1995, regardless of what periods the payment rates, audits, or settlements may cover,)) The department shall establish in rule, consistent with federal requirements for nursing facilities participating in the medicaid program, an appeals or exception procedure that allows individual nursing care providers an opportunity to submit additional evidence and receive prompt administrative review of payment rates with respect to such issues as the department deems appropriate.


             Sec. 41. RCW 74.46.800 and 1980 c 177 s 80 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The department shall have authority to adopt, ((promulgate,)) amend, and rescind such administrative rules and definitions as ((are)) it deems necessary to carry out the policies and purposes of this chapter and to resolve issues and develop procedures that it deems necessary to implement, update, and improve the case mix elements of the nursing facility medicaid payment system. ((In addition, at least annually the department shall review changes to generally accepted accounting principles and generally accepted auditing standards as approved by the financial accounting standards board, and the American institute of certified public accountants, respectively. The department shall adopt by administrative rule those approved changes which it finds to be consistent with the policies and purposes of this chapter.))

             (2) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require the department to adopt or employ any calculations, steps, tests, methodologies, alternate methodologies, indexes, formulas, mathematical or statistical models, concepts, or procedures for medicaid rate setting or payment that are not expressly called for in this chapter.


             Sec. 42. RCW 74.46.820 and 1985 c 361 s 14 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) ((Cost reports and their final audit)) Financial reports filed by the contractor shall be subject to public disclosure pursuant to the requirements of chapter 42.17 RCW. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, ((cost)) reports ((schedules)) showing information on rental or lease of assets, the facility or corporate balance sheet, schedule of changes in financial position, statement of changes in equity-fund balances, notes to financial statements, and any ((accompanying)) schedules summarizing ((the)) adjustments to a contractor's financial records, reports on review of internal control and accounting procedures, and letters of comments or recommendations relating to suggested improvements in internal control or accounting procedures which are prepared pursuant to the requirements of this chapter shall be exempt from public disclosure.

             ((This)) (2) Subsection (1) of this section does not prevent a contractor from having access to its own records or from authorizing an agent or designee to have access to the contractor's records.

             (((2))) (3) Regardless of whether any document or report submitted to the secretary pursuant to this chapter is subject to public disclosure, copies of such documents or reports shall be provided by the secretary, upon written request, to the legislature and to state agencies or state or local law enforcement officials who have an official interest in the contents thereof.


             Sec. 43. RCW 74.46.840 and 1983 1st ex.s. c 67 s 42 are each amended to read as follows:

             If any part of this chapter ((and)) or RCW 18.51.145 ((and)) or 74.09.120 is found by an agency of the federal government to be in conflict with federal requirements ((which)) that are a prescribed condition to the receipts of federal funds to the state, the conflicting part of this chapter ((and)) or RCW 18.51.145 ((and)) or 74.09.120 is ((hereby)) declared inoperative solely to the extent of the conflict and with respect to the agencies directly affected, and such finding or determination shall not affect the operation of the remainder of this chapter ((and)) or RCW 18.51.145 ((and)) or 74.09.120 in its application to the agencies concerned. In the event that any portion of this chapter ((and)) or RCW 18.51.145 ((and)) or 74.09.120 is found to be in conflict with federal requirements ((which)) that are a prescribed condition to the receipt of federal funds, the secretary, to the extent that the secretary finds it to be consistent with the general policies and intent of chapters 18.51, 74.09, and 74.46 RCW, may adopt such rules as to resolve a specific conflict and ((which)) that do meet minimum federal requirements. In addition, the secretary shall submit to the next regular session of the legislature a summary of the specific rule changes made and recommendations for statutory resolution of the conflict.


             Sec. 44. RCW 74.09.120 and 1993 sp.s. c 3 s 8 are each amended to read as follows:

             The department shall purchase necessary physician and dentist services by contract or "fee for service." The department shall purchase nursing home care by contract and payment for the care shall be in accordance with the provisions of chapter 74.46 RCW and rules adopted by the department under the authority of RCW 74.46.800. ((The department shall establish regulations for reasonable nursing home accounting and reimbursement systems which shall provide that)) No payment shall be made to a nursing home which does not permit inspection by the department of social and health services of every part of its premises and an examination of all records, including financial records, methods of administration, general and special dietary programs, the disbursement of drugs and methods of supply, and any other records the department deems relevant to the ((establishment of such a system)) regulation of nursing home operations, enforcement of standards for resident care, and payment for nursing home services.

             The department may purchase nursing home care by contract in veterans' homes operated by the state department of veterans affairs((. The department shall establish rules for reasonable accounting and reimbursement systems for such care)) and payment for the care shall be in accordance with the provisions of chapter 74.46 RCW and rules adopted by the department under the authority of RCW 74.46.800.

             The department may purchase care in institutions for the mentally retarded, also known as intermediate care facilities for the mentally retarded. The department shall establish rules for reasonable accounting and reimbursement systems for such care. Institutions for the mentally retarded include licensed nursing homes, public institutions, licensed boarding homes with fifteen beds or less, and hospital facilities certified as intermediate care facilities for the mentally retarded under the federal medicaid program to provide health, habilitative, or rehabilitative services and twenty-four hour supervision for mentally retarded individuals or persons with related conditions and includes in the program "active treatment" as federally defined.

             The department may purchase care in institutions for mental diseases by contract. The department shall establish rules for reasonable accounting and reimbursement systems for such care. Institutions for mental diseases are certified under the federal medicaid program and primarily engaged in providing diagnosis, treatment, or care to persons with mental diseases, including medical attention, nursing care, and related services.

             The department may purchase all other services provided under this chapter by contract or at rates established by the department.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 45. (1) Payment for direct care at the pilot nursing facility in King county designed to meet the service needs of residents living with AIDS, as defined in RCW 70.24.017, and as specifically authorized for this purpose under chapter 9, Laws of 1989 1st ex. sess., shall be exempt from case mix methods of rate determination set forth in this chapter and shall be exempt from the direct care metropolitan statistical area peer group cost limitation set forth in this chapter.

             (2) Direct care component rates at the AIDS pilot facility shall be based on direct care reported costs at the pilot facility, utilizing the same three-year, rate-setting cycle prescribed for other nursing facilities, and as supported by a staffing benchmark based upon a department-approved acuity measurement system.

             (3) All other rate-setting principles, cost lids, and limits, including settlement at the lower of cost or rate in direct care, therapy care, and support services, shall apply to the AIDS pilot facility.

             (4) This section applies only to the AIDS pilot nursing facility.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 46. For nursing facilities located in King county that commenced operations in February 1995, the department shall use each such facility's 1996 allowable costs to retroactively adjust and reset the July 1, 1997, nursing services, food, administrative, and operational rate components. In determining 1996 allowable costs for the affected King county facilities, the department shall use 1994 cost limits adjusted to 1996. The 1996 cost report shall be the basis for rates subsequent to July 1, 1997, until such time as the nursing facility payment methodology recognizes a new cost report for all facilities. The 1996 allowable costs used to revise the July 1, 1997, rate components shall be adjusted using an inflation factor of 3.79 percent.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 47. (1) The department of social and health services shall study and provide recommendations, by December 12, 1998, to the chairs of the house of representatives health care committee and the senate health and long-term care committee on the appropriateness of extending the case mix principles, described in chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (this act), to home and community service providers, as defined in chapter 74.39A RCW. The department shall invite stakeholders to participate in this study.

             (2) By December 12, 1999, the department of social and health services shall study and provide recommendations to the chairs of the house of representatives appropriations and health care committees, and the senate ways and means and health and long-term care committees, concerning options for changing the method for paying facilities for capital and property related expenses.

             (3) The department of social and health services shall contract with an independent and recognized organization to study and evaluate the impacts of chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (this act) implementation on access, quality of care, quality of life for nursing facility residents, and the wage and benefit levels of all nursing facility employees. The department shall require, and the contractor shall submit, a report with the results of this study and evaluation, including their findings, to the governor and legislature by December 1, 2001.

             (4) The department of social and health services shall study and, as needed, specify additional case mix groups and appropriate case mix weights to reflect the resource utilization of residents whose care needs are not adequately identified or reflected in the resource utilization group III grouper version 5.10. At a minimum, the department shall study the adequacy of the resource utilization group III grouper version 5.10, including the minimum data set, for capturing the care and resource utilization needs of residents with AIDS, residents with traumatic brain injury, and residents who are behaviorally challenged. The department shall report its findings to the chairs of the house of representatives health care committee and the senate health and long-term care committee by December 12, 2002.

             (5) By December 12, 2002, the department of social and health services shall report to the legislature and provide an evaluation of the fiscal impact of rebasing future payments at different intervals, including the impact of averaging two years' cost data as the basis for rebasing. This report shall include the fiscal impact to the state and the fiscal impact to nursing facility providers.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 48. The department shall not deem tax expenses that have never been incurred by a nursing facility to be a medicaid allowable cost to that facility for the purposes of payment for services, as described in chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (this act).


             Sec. 49. RCW 72.36.030 and 1993 sp.s. c 3 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

             All of the following persons who have been actual bona fide residents of this state at the time of their application, and who are indigent and unable to support themselves and their families may be admitted to a state veterans' home under rules as may be adopted by the director of the department, unless sufficient facilities and resources are not available to accommodate these people:

             (1)(a) All honorably discharged veterans of a branch of the armed forces of the United States or merchant marines; (b) members of the state militia disabled while in the line of duty; ((and)) (c) Filipino World War II veterans who swore an oath to American authority and who participated in military engagements with American soldiers; and (d) the spouses of these veterans, merchant marines, and members of the state militia. However, it is required that the spouse was married to and living with the veteran three years prior to the date of application for admittance, or, if married to him or her since that date, was also a resident of a state veterans' home in this state or entitled to admission thereto;

             (2)(a) The spouses of: (i) All honorably discharged veterans of the United States armed forces; (ii) merchant marines; and (iii) members of the state militia who were disabled while in the line of duty and who were residents of a state veterans' home in this state or were entitled to admission to one of this state's state veteran homes at the time of death; (b) the spouses of: (i) All honorably discharged veterans of a branch of the United States armed forces; (ii) merchant marines; and (iii) members of the state militia who would have been entitled to admission to one of this state's state veterans' homes at the time of death, but for the fact that the spouse was not indigent, but has since become indigent and unable to support himself or herself and his or her family. However, the included spouse shall be at least fifty years old and have been married to and living with their husband or wife for three years prior to the date of their application. The included spouse shall not have been married since the death of his or her husband or wife to a person who is not a resident of one of this state's state veterans' homes or entitled to admission to one of this state's state veterans' homes; and

             (3) All applicants for admission to a state veterans' home shall apply for all federal and state benefits for which they may be eligible, including medical assistance under chapter 74.09 RCW.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 50. The following acts or parts of acts are each repealed:

                                       (1)        RCW 74.46.105 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 91, 1985 c 361 s 10, & 1983 1st ex.s. c 67 s 5;

                                       (2)        RCW 74.46.115 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 92 & 1983 1st ex.s. c 67 s 6;

                                       (3)        RCW 74.46.130 and 1985 c 361 s 11, 1983 1st ex.s. c 67 s 7, & 1980 c 177 s 13;

                                       (4)        RCW 74.46.150 and 1983 1st ex.s. c 67 s 8 & 1980 c 177 s 15;

                                       (5)        RCW 74.46.160 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 93, 1985 c 361 s 12, 1983 1st ex.s. c 67 s 9, & 1980 c 177 s 16;

                                       (6)        RCW 74.46.170 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 94, 1983 1st ex.s. c 67 s 10, & 1980 c 177 s 17;

                                       (7)        RCW 74.46.180 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 95 & 1993 sp.s. c 13 s 2;

                                       (8)        RCW 74.46.210 and 1991 sp.s. c 8 s 14 & 1980 c 177 s 21; and

                                       (9)        RCW 74.46.670 and 1983 1st ex.s. c 67 s 35 & 1980 c 177 s 67.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 51. RCW 74.46.595 and 1995 1st sp.s. c 18 s 98 are each repealed effective July 2, 1998.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 52. Sections 1 through 46 and 48 through 54 of this act take effect July 1, 1998.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 53. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 54. Sections 9, 10, 18, 19, 21 through 30, 45, 46, and 48 of this act are each added to chapter 74.46 RCW.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 55. Section 47 of this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately."


             On page 1, beginning on line 1 of the title, after "rates;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 74.46.010, 74.46.020, 74.46.040, 74.46.050, 74.46.060, 74.46.080, 74.46.090, 74.46.100, 74.46.190, 74.46.220, 74.46.230, 74.46.270, 74.46.280, 74.46.300, 74.46.410, 74.46.475, 74.46.610, 74.46.620, 74.46.630, 74.46.640, 74.46.650, 74.46.660, 74.46.680, 74.46.690, 74.46.770, 74.46.780, 74.46.800, 74.46.820, 74.46.840, 74.09.120, and 72.36.030; adding new sections to chapter 74.46 RCW; creating a new section; repealing RCW 74.46.105, 74.46.115, 74.46.130, 74.46.150, 74.46.160, 74.46.170, 74.46.180, 74.46.210, 74.46.670, and 74.46.595; prescribing penalties; providing an effective date; and declaring an emergency."


             Representative Dyer moved the adoption of amendment (1006) to the striking amendment (1004):


             On page 23, line 19 of the striking amendment, after "July 1," strike "1999" and insert "1998"


             Representative Dyer spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


             The amendment to the amendment was adopted.


             Representatives Dyer and Cody spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment (1004) as amended by amendment (1006).


             The amendment as amended was adopted. The bill was ordered engrossed.


             There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


             Representatives H. Sommers, Tokuda, Alexander, Conway, Parlette, Huff, Kenney and Cody spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 2935.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 2935 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Anderson, Appelwick, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Butler, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Chopp, Clements, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooke, Cooper, Costa, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kenney, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Lantz, Linville, Lisk, Mason, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Morris, Mulliken, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Parlette, Pennington, Poulsen, Quall, Radcliff, Reams, Regala, Robertson, Romero, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Smith, Sommers, D., Sommers, H., Sterk, Sullivan, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Tokuda, Van Luven, Veloria, Wensman, Wolfe, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 96.

             Excused: Representatives Skinner and Zellinsky - 2.


             Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 2935, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


             HOUSE BILL NO. 2514, by Representatives Chandler, Linville, Mastin, Parlette, Koster, Anderson, Regala and Cooper

 

Providing for integrated watershed management.


             The bill was read the second time. There being no objection, Substitute House Bill No. 2514 was substituted for House Bill No. 2514 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.


             Substitute House Bill No. 2514 was read the second time.


             Representative Chandler moved the adoption of striking amendment (985):


             Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:


             "Sec. 1. RCW 90.82.005 and 1997 c 442 s 101 are each amended to read as follows:

             The purpose of this chapter is to develop a ((more)) thorough and cooperative method ((of)) that provides local citizens the maximum possible input for: Determining what the current water resource situation is in each water resource inventory area of the state and ((to provide local citizens with the maximum possible input concerning their)) establishing goals and objectives for water resource management and development; reviewing water quality problems and recommending strategies for achieving compliance with water quality standards; and coordinating with any plans for the protection and enhancement of fish habitat.

             It is necessary for the legislature to establish processes and policies that will result in providing state agencies with more specific guidance to manage the water resources of the state consistent with current law and direction provided by local entities and citizens through the process established in accordance with this chapter.

             It is the intent of this chapter to provide locally based groups with the opportunity to: Assess local water supplies and needs and develop strategies to provide adequate water for economic prosperity and environmental protection while protecting existing water rights; ensure that adequate water supplies are available for population and economic growth under the requirements of the state's growth management act, chapter 36.70A RCW; review water quality problems and develop a strategy for achieving compliance with water quality standards; and coordinate plans for protection and enhancement of fish habitat.

             Chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (this act) is enacted to: Improve the ability of local governments and citizens to be involved in the design and implementation of solutions to water quantity, water quality, and habitat needs for fish species and provide an opportunity for people in all watersheds to be involved in watershed planning if they so desire; provide a flexible mechanism for conducting locally initiated watershed planning on either a single watershed basis or, if more appropriate, on a multiple watershed basis; and allow local people to determine the scope of the watershed planning process while encouraging them to consider comprehensive watershed planning that includes addressing water quantity, water quality, and habitat for fish species in concert with one another.

             Thus it is the intent of the legislature for integrated watershed management to help produce: Adequate water quantity for the future, adequate water quality to protect and promote beneficial uses, and sufficient protection and enhancement of habitat so that fish resources thrive to be used and enjoyed by citizens of the state.

             It is also the intent of the legislature to encourage collaboration and cooperation between the wide range of interests, and local, state, federal, and tribal governments to develop solutions to watershed problems. The state of Washington wishes to recognize and maintain formal government-to-government relationships, and it also endeavors to work cooperatively with all governmental entities and representatives of citizen groups to foster effective and practical solutions that have broad-based support. It is the intent of the legislature that all of the citizens of the state of Washington work cooperatively to ensure that the management of the state's economic destiny and environmental heritage remains in the hands of Washington's citizens as much as possible.

             Nothing in this chapter may be construed as affecting or impairing existing water or property rights.


             Sec. 2. RCW 90.82.010 and 1997 c 442 s 102 are each amended to read as follows:

             The legislature finds that the state's vital interests are served by the wise management of the state's water resources, by protecting existing water rights and dependent economies, by protecting and enhancing instream flows and habitat for fish, and by providing for the public health and economic well-being of the state's citizenry and communities. The legislature finds that many regions of the state are facing challenges relating to water quantity, water quality, and habitat for fish species. There are a number of bodies of water in the state that do not meet federal and state water quality standards. In several areas of the state, there has been a significant decrease in the number of fish returning to state waters and there is a growing sense of urgency to protect and enhance existing fishery resources. The pressures of a growing population and expanding economy have led some local communities to seek additional water supplies for present and future needs and to seek certainty that the supplies will be available for those needs.

             The legislature finds that the local development of watershed plans for managing water resources ((and)), for protecting existing water rights and dependent economies, and for protecting and enhancing habitat for fish is vital to both state and local interests. The local development of these plans serves vital local interests by placing it in the hands of people: Who have the greatest knowledge of both the resources and the aspirations of those who live and work in the watershed; and who have the greatest stake in the proper, long-term management of the resources. The development of such plans serves the state's vital interests by ensuring that the state's water resources are used wisely, by protecting existing water rights and dependent economies, by protecting instream flows for fish, by protecting or enhancing fish habitat, and by providing for the economic well-being of the state's citizenry and communities. Therefore, the legislature believes it necessary for units of local government throughout the state to engage in the orderly development of these watershed plans.

             The legislature finds that water resource and fish habitat challenges vary from region to region. The legislature also finds that, in many cases, addressing one water resource or fishery habitat issue can cause concerns and have effects in other areas; as a result, integrated watershed management may be needed to address the variety of these challenges simultaneously.

             The legislature further recognizes that considerable effort for addressing many of the challenges is represented by the work, planning, projects, and activities that have already been completed by local interests regarding watershed management or have been initiated and are in various stages of completion. The legislature finds that, if new, integrated watershed management is to be initiated, it must begin with a thorough review of these completed or ongoing efforts and should incorporate their products as appropriate so as not to duplicate the work already performed or underway.

             Although these challenges may require approaches that are integrated and comprehensive, the legislature finds that considerable authority currently exists to address these issues but that such authority is spread across an array of federal, state, tribal, and local governments. Integration and coordination of such authorities in ways that have support of state, local, and tribal interests will be needed to develop and implement multi-interest and comprehensive solutions. The legislature further finds that new state and federal regulatory regimes are by and large not necessary to develop good watershed management and that local authorities in particular provide a broad array of implementation tools to support good watershed management. However, the legislature finds that the key to meeting existing regulatory objectives is the involvement and support of local citizens and local governments working cooperatively with state, federal, and tribal governments. The legislature recognizes that it is unable to provide all the funding necessary for integrated watershed management to be developed throughout the entire state at once, and that as a result, watershed management will be phased in across the state over time, and that the state has an ongoing responsibility to provide funding for the watershed management described in this chapter.


             Sec. 3. RCW 90.82.020 and 1997 c 442 s 103 are each amended to read as follows:

             Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.

             (1) "City" means an incorporated city, code city, or town.

             (2) "Department" means the department of ecology.

             (((2))) (3) "Implementing rules" for ((a WRIA plan)) integrated watershed management developed by a planning unit are the rules needed to give force and effect to the parts of the ((plan)) integrated watershed management that create rights or obligations for ((any party including)) a state agency ((or that establish water management policy)).

             (((3))) (4) "Indian tribe" means any Indian tribe, band, or nation that: (a) is recognized as eligible, by the secretary of the interior, for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians; and (b) is recognized as possessing powers of self-government.

             (5) "Lead agency" means the entity identified under section 9 of this act that makes provision for administrative staff support for and receives grants for a planning unit developing integrated watershed management under this chapter.

             (6) "Management area" means the WRIA or the multiple WRIA area for which integrated watershed management is developed by a planning unit under this chapter.

             (7) "Minimum instream flows" means ((a minimum)) flows that meet the requirements of minimum flows under chapter 90.03 or 90.22 RCW ((or a)) and base flows under chapter 90.54 RCW as adopted by rule.

             (((4))) (8) "Planning unit" means a planning unit established under section 10 of this act.

             (9) "WRIA" means a water resource inventory area established in chapter 173-500 WAC as it existed on January 1, 1997.

             (((5))) (10) "Water supply utility" means a ((water, combined)) water-sewer district, irrigation district, reclamation district, or public utility district that provides water to persons or other water users within the district or a division or unit responsible for administering a publicly governed water supply system on behalf of a county.

             (((6) "WRIA plan" or "plan)) (11) "Integrated watershed management" means the product of the planning unit ((including)) and includes the plan of the planning unit approved under section 11 of this act, any rules adopted in conjunction with the ((product)) plan of the planning unit, and strategies of the planning unit for implementing its plan.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. ELEMENTS OF MANAGEMENT--PRIORITY PROJECTS. (1) Counties, cities, and water supply utilities may, at their option, provide for the development of integrated watershed management for watersheds under this chapter. If initiated, such management shall be developed for water quantity components of water resource management under section 5 of this act, water quality components of water resource management under section 7 of this act, and the coordination of protection or enhancement of fish habitat under section 8 of this act. If integrated watershed management is initiated under this chapter, minimum instream flows shall be established for streams in the management area as provided in section 6 of this act. It is anticipated that a planning unit will not await the development of proposals for minimum instream flows under section 6 of this act to begin developing other components of its integrated watershed management for a management area; rather, work on these developments will be undertaken concurrently.

             (2) Under this chapter, integrated watershed management may be developed by a planning unit for one or more WRIAs, but may not be developed by a planning unit for less than one WRIA except for those watersheds planned as pilot projects in the Methow and Dungeness/Quilcene areas before the effective date of this section. This chapter may not be construed to prevent or delay any planning, projects, or activities that are commenced under other laws or that are authorized.

             (3) Integrated watershed management developed and approved under this chapter shall not contain provisions that (a) are in conflict with state statutes, federal laws, or tribal treaty rights, existing on the effective date of this section; (b) impair or diminish in any manner an existing water right evidenced by a claim filed in the water rights claims registry or a water right certificate or permit; (c) require a modification in the basic operations of a federal reclamation project with a water right the priority date of which is before the effective date of this section or alter in any manner whatsoever the quantity of water available under the water right for the reclamation project, whether the project has or has not been completed before the effective date of this section; (d) affect or interfere with an ongoing general adjudication of water rights; (e) modify or require the modification of any waste discharge permit issued under chapter 90.48 RCW; or (f) modify or require the modification of activities or actions taken to protect or enhance fish habitat if the activities or actions are: (i) Part of a habitat conservation plan and permit, an incidental take permit or statement, a management or recovery plan, or other cooperative or conservation agreement entered into with a federal or state fish and wildlife protection agency under its statutory authority for fish and wildlife protection that addresses the affected habitat; or (ii) part of an agreement regulating forest practices, which is adopted by rule by the forest practices board under the forest practices act, chapter 76.09 RCW, for the affected habitat. This subsection (3)(f) applies as long as the activities or actions continue to be taken in accordance with the plan, agreement, permit, statement, or rules. Any assessment conducted under section 5, 7, or 8 of this act shall take into consideration such activities and actions.

             (4) Integrated watershed management developed and approved under this chapter shall not change existing local ordinances or existing state rules, but it may contain recommendations for changing such ordinances or rules.

             (5) Once a planning unit has begun developing integrated watershed management under this chapter, the unit shall, as a matter of high priority:

             (a) Review the historical geographic characteristics of the management area, and also review the planning, projects, and activities that have already been completed regarding natural resource management or enhancement in the management area and the products or status of those that have been initiated but not completed for such management in the management area, and incorporate their products as appropriate so as not to duplicate the work already performed or underway; and

             (b) Identify projects and activities in the management area that the unit believes will likely serve short-term or long-term management goals and that warrant immediate financial assistance from state, federal, or local government. The planning unit shall prioritize these projects and activities in a manner that reflects the degree to which they serve the unit's goals and the costs and the benefits of undertaking them. The unit shall submit its prioritized list to the local governments with jurisdiction and, through the lead state representative on the planning unit designated under section 10(5)(j) of this act, to the legislature and the appropriate state agencies.

             (6) Integrated watershed management planning conducted under sections 5, 7, and 8 of this act shall identify within the management area the actions and activities that are necessary to: Implement the provisions of the integrated watershed management, monitor the effectiveness of the implementation, and provide any needed modifications. It shall also identify the entities responsible for conducting these actions and activities. It shall also identify any entity responsible for the coordinated oversight of these responsibilities.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. WATER QUANTITY. Integrated watershed management established for water quantity in the management area shall include an assessment of water supply and use in the management area, including:

             (1) An estimate of the surface and ground water present in the management area;

             (2) An estimate of the surface and ground water available in the management area, taking into account seasonal and other variations;

             (3) An estimate of the water in the management area represented by claims in the water rights claims registry, water use permits, certificated rights, existing minimum instream flow rules, federally reserved rights, and any other rights to water;

             (4) An estimate of the surface and ground water actually being used in the management area;

             (5) An estimate of the water needed in the future for use in the management area;

             (6) An identification of the location areas where aquifers are known to recharge surface bodies of water and areas known to provide for the recharge of aquifers from the surface;

             (7) An estimate of the surface and ground water available for further appropriation, taking into account the minimum instream flows adopted by rule or to be adopted by rule for streams in the management area; and

             (8) Strategies for increasing water supplies in the management area, which may include, but are not limited to, increasing water supplies through water conservation, water reuse, the use of reclaimed water, voluntary water transfers, aquifer recharge and recovery, additional water allocations, or water storage enhancements. The objective of these strategies is to supply water in sufficient quantities to satisfy the minimum instream flows and to provide water for future out-of-stream uses for water identified in subsection (5) of this section and to ensure that adequate water supplies are available for population and economic growth under the requirements of the state's growth management act, chapter 36.70A RCW. These strategies shall not be construed to be an allocation of water. If integrated watershed management is established by a planning unit under this section for water quantity components of water resource management in a management area and that management is approved by the counties under section 11 of this act but does not contain the strategies required under this subsection, all components of integrated watershed management established by the planning unit under this chapter are void.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. INSTREAM FLOWS. (1)(a) Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, minimum instream flows shall be established by rule for the principal stream or streams in the WRIA or multiple WRIA area for which integrated watershed management is developed by a planning unit under this chapter. At the time a planning unit is chosen or created under section 10 of this act or initial appointments are made by cities and counties under section 10 of this act, the cities and counties in a management area may decide, as described in section 9(9) of this act, that the planning unit will not participate in identifying such flows in the management area, in which case they shall request the department to adopt rules establishing the minimum instream flows for the principle stream or streams in the management area.

             (b) In all other management areas after considering in detail the assessment provided in section 5 of this act, identifying the flow regimes that make up the minimum instream flows shall be a collaborative effort between the department and the members of the planning unit developing the integrated watershed management. As these flows are developed, it shall be the duty of the department to attempt to achieve consensus among all of the members of the planning unit regarding the minimum flows to be adopted by rule by the department. Approval is achieved if:

             (i) The members of the planning unit present for a recorded vote on the proposed minimum instream flows who have been appointed to represent the state through the shared ballot process described in section 10 (6) and (9) of this act, each appointed to represent tribal governments with federal Indian reservations or federally recognized ceded lands located in whole or in part within the management area or fishing rights recognized under federal case law on lands within the management area, each appointed to represent directly counties, each appointed to represent directly cities, each appointed to represent directly conservation districts, and each appointed to represent directly water supply utilities records his or her support for the proposed minimum instream flows as part of the recorded vote or abstains from voting on the proposal; and

             (ii) A majority of the members of the planning unit, other than those who have been appointed to represent the entities identified in (b)(i) of this subsection, who are present for a recorded vote on proposed minimum instream flows, records support for the proposed minimum instream flows as part of the recorded vote on the proposal.

             That such a recorded vote will be taken on proposed minimum instream flows shall be announced at the official meeting of the planning unit immediately preceding the official meeting of the unit at which the vote is recorded and a notice regarding voting on proposed minimum instream flows shall be sent to each member appointed to the planning unit as soon as possible following the meeting at which such an announcement is made.

             (2) If approval of the planning unit is achieved on minimum instream flows proposed for a management area under subsection (1) of this section, the department shall establish those flows by rule as described in RCW 90.82.040(8).

             (3) If approval is not achieved under subsection (1) of this section within four years of the date the planning unit first receives funding from the department under RCW 90.82.040, the department may promptly initiate rule making under chapter 34.05 RCW to establish minimum instream flows for these streams. If the planning unit did not achieve approval on establishing minimum instream flows, the planning unit may submit the vote on instream flows to the department for its consideration. Minimum flows established under this section shall have a priority date of two years after the planning unit first received funding from the department under RCW 90.82.040.

             (4) If minimum instream flows have been adopted by rule for a stream in the management area and the cities and counties do not, under section 9 of this act, request the planning unit or the department to modify those flows, minimum instream flows for the stream shall not be modified for the stream under this chapter. If the cities and counties request, under section 9 of this act, that the planning unit modify the minimum instream flows for the stream but approval is not achieved under this section for modifying those flows, minimum instream flows shall not be modified for the stream under this chapter.

             (5) Nothing in this chapter either: (a) Affects the department's authority to establish flow requirements or other conditions under RCW 90.48.260 or the federal clean water act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.) for the licensing or relicensing of a hydroelectric power project under the federal power act (16 U.S.C. Sec. 791 et seq.); or (b) affects or impairs existing instream flow requirements and other conditions in a current license for a hydroelectric power project licensed under the federal power act.

             (6) Minimum instream flows shall not be proposed or adopted for the main stem of the Columbia river or the main stem of the Snake river under this chapter.

             (7) A planning unit may consider identifying how minimum instream flows could be modified in response to the successful implementation of other elements of the integrated watershed management.

             (8) As used in this section, the "principal stream or streams" are, in a management area for which the department is requested by cities and counties to adopt minimum instream flows under subsection (1)(a) of this section, the streams determined by the department to be the principal stream or streams. In any other management area, the "principal stream or streams" are the main stem of the stream with the largest annual average flow in each WRIA in the management area; and the major tributaries to such a main stem and any other streams in the management area that are determined to be principal streams by the planning unit by a majority vote of the planning unit. "Principal stream or streams" does not include streambeds that are used as laterals for irrigation and are nonfish-bearing.

             (9) Nothing in this chapter may be construed as affecting or impairing in any manner whatsoever water rights existing before the effective date of this section.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. WATER QUALITY. Integrated watershed management established for water quality in the management area shall include the following components:

             (1) An examination based on existing studies conducted by federal, state, and local agencies of the degree to which legally established water quality standards are being met in the management area;

             (2) An examination based on existing studies conducted by federal, state, and local agencies of the causes of water quality violations in the management area, including an examination of information regarding pollutants, point and nonpoint sources of pollution, and pollution-carrying capacities of water bodies in the management area. The analysis shall take into account seasonal stream flow or level variations, natural events, and pollution from natural sources that occurs independent of human activities;

             (3) An examination of the uses of each of the nonmarine bodies of water in the management area and an identification of the beneficial uses of each for water quality classification purposes;

             (4) An identification of the class of use for nonmarine bodies of water and for basin-specific water quality standards that may be adopted by rule by the department and recommendations for the water quality standards to be adopted for those bodies of water;

             (5) A recommended strategy for achieving compliance with water quality standards for the nonmarine bodies of water in the management area; and

             (6) Recommended means of monitoring by appropriate government agencies whether actions taken to implement the strategy bring about improvements in water quality that are sufficient to achieve compliance with water quality standards.

             This chapter does not obligate the state to undertake analysis or to develop strategies required under the federal clean water act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.).


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. HABITAT. Integrated watershed management shall be coordinated, or as needed, developed to protect or enhance fish habitat in the management area by relying on existing laws and rules adopted under habitat planning processes such as the habitat work plans prepared under chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (Substitute House Bill No. 2496) and other existing plans created for the purpose of protecting, restoring, or enhancing fish habitat, the shoreline management act, chapter 90.58 RCW, the growth management act, chapter 36.70A RCW, and the forest practices act, chapter 76.09 RCW. Management established under this section shall be integrated with strategies developed under other processes to respond to potential and actual listings of salmon and other fish species as being threatened or endangered under the federal endangered species act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq. Integrated watershed management developed for such purposes shall include the following components:

             (1) An analysis of the potential for protecting or enhancing fish habitat in the management area;

             (2) An identification of fish habitat protection or enhancement activities and projects and voluntary transactions, including but not limited to those providing for the purchase of fish habitat or fish habitat easements, that would provide the greatest benefit to such habitat in the management area. Where habitat work plans developed under chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (Substitute House Bill No. 2496) are available or are intended to be developed, the planning shall rely on those plans;

             (3) Recommended means of ensuring that the activities, projects, and transactions identified under subsection (2) of this section will be undertaken. Where habitat work plans developed under chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (Substitute House Bill No. 2496) are available or are intended to be developed, the planning shall rely on those plans; and

             (4) Recommended means of monitoring the effect of undertaking the activities, projects, and transactions identified under subsection (2) of this section on protecting or enhancing fish habitat in the management area.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. INITIATING INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT. The following is the procedure by which the development of integrated watershed management may be initiated under this chapter.

             (1) The following entities may decide that integrated watershed management should be considered: (a) The county with the largest area within the boundaries of a single WRIA or multi-WRIA proposed management area; (b) the city, if there is one, within the proposed management area using the largest amount of water from within the proposed management area; (c) the city, if there is one, cumulatively diverting and withdrawing the largest amount of water from within the proposed management area; and (d) the water supply utility, if there is one, that provides the largest quantity of water in the proposed management area. However, the county with the largest area bordering on the main stem of the stream with the largest annual flow, not including the Columbia or Snake rivers, within the boundaries of a WRIA, the city obtaining the largest amount of water from the WRIA, and the largest water supply utility in the WRIA may jointly and unanimously choose to initiate watershed management for the WRIA under this chapter.

             (2) If entities in subsection (1) of this section decide jointly an unanimously to proceed, they shall invite the Indian tribe, if there is one, with the largest reservation within the proposed management area to participate in integrated watershed management.

             (3) The entities in subsection (1) of this section, including the tribe if it affirmatively accepts the invitation, constitute the initiating governments for the purposes of this section.

             (4) On behalf of the initiating governments, the county with the largest area within the boundaries of the proposed management area shall convene a public meeting in the affected area to discuss the appointment of a planning unit for developing integrated watershed management under this chapter. Notices of the meeting shall be sent to:

             (a) County governments with territory in the proposed management area;

             (b) The cities of each county located in and cities that receive water from the proposed management area;

             (c) Tribal governments of federal Indian reservations or federally recognized ceded lands located in whole or in part within the boundaries of the proposed management area;

             (d) Water supply utilities located in and water supply utilities that receive water from the proposed management area;

             (e) Conservation districts with territory in the proposed management area;

             (f) Groups and entities that have been or are currently engaged in public planning processes within the proposed management area that involve water quantity, water quality, or habitat restoration activities. In providing this notice, the county shall make a reasonable attempt to identify and notify groups and entities that within the last five years have been or are currently engaged in such planning; and

             (g) The department, which shall notify other appropriate state agencies, appropriate Indian tribes, and appropriate federal agencies.

             The notice shall contain the purpose, time, and location of the meeting. The notice shall also be published at least once a week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the proposed management area. The notice that is published in the newspaper shall invite members of the general public to participate.

             (5) The purpose of the public meeting is to obtain comments regarding initiating the development of integrated watershed management under this chapter, the coordination of that process with ongoing planning processes and activities in the watershed, and the creation of a planning unit to prepare the integrated watershed management.

             (6) For developing integrated watershed management under this chapter, the county with the largest area within the boundaries of the proposed management area is the lead agency for the development of the integrated watershed management, unless the cities, counties, and Indian tribes described in subsection (8) of this section approve the designation of another governmental agency as the lead agency. Such a governmental agency shall act as the lead agency for this purpose if it agrees in writing to accept the designation.

             (7) At or following the public meeting, the county that convened the meeting shall call for a vote of the cities, counties, and Indian tribes described in subsection (8) of this section as to whether to proceed with the development of integrated watershed management under this chapter in the proposed management area. If these cities, counties, and Indian tribes approve proceeding with the development of such management, the lead agency shall make application to the department for funding to develop integrated watershed management under this chapter.

             (8) The cities, counties, and Indian tribes that may make decisions under subsections (6) and (7) of this section may choose the type of planning unit to be used for developing integrated watershed management under this chapter in the proposed management area under section 10 of this act.

             (9) At the time a planning unit is chosen or created under section 10 of this act or initial appointments are made by cities and counties under section 10 of this act, the cities and counties in a management area may: (a) Decide that the planning unit will not participate in identifying such flows in the management area, in which case they shall request the department to adopt rules establishing the minimum instream flows for the principal stream or streams in the management area; or (b) if minimum instream flows have been adopted by rule for a stream in the management area, request either the planning unit or the department to modify those flows. To approve an action for these purposes, the cities must approve the action by majority vote, with each city having one vote, and the counties must approve the action by unanimous vote, with each county having one vote. The vote of each city and each county shall be the vote assigned directly, in person or in writing, by the elected officials of the city and directly, in person or in writing, by the members of the legislative authority of the county. For this purpose, the "elected officials" of a city are the members of the city's legislative authority and, if applicable, its elected mayor.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. PLANNING UNIT--APPOINTMENT--OPTIONS. (1) If the initiating governments approve proceeding with the development of integrated watershed management for a management area as described in section 9(7) of this act, the development of such management will be conducted under this chapter in the single WRIA or multiple WRIA management area by one planning unit. As provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, the cities, counties, and tribe may choose an existing planning group as the basis for local representation on the planning unit or they may identify the composition of a new group as the basis for local representation on the planning unit. Such a choice shall be made as described in section 9(9) of this act. If the cities, counties, and tribe do not choose such an existing or new group in this manner, the planning unit to be used for developing the integrated watershed management for the management area is the planning unit specified in subsection (5) of this section.

             (2) If the cities, counties, and tribe choose an existing planning group as the basis for local representation on a planning unit, the planning group shall have been in existence for at least one year before being so chosen. To be considered, the representation of governmental entities and interest groups on such a planning group must be generally similar to the representation identified in subsections (5)(a) through (g) and (12) of this section, or the planning group shall have a statutorily specified membership. If the cities, counties, and tribe find that the existing group has the required composition and find that the scope of the group's work is or has been appropriate considering the tasks to be given the planning unit under this chapter, the cities, counties, and tribe may designate the group as the basis for local participation on the planning unit. The existing group chosen in this manner plus the membership specified in subsection (5)(j) of this section and any membership provided under subsection (5)(i) of this section, which provide for representation by state and tribal governments, constitute the planning unit for developing integrated watershed management under this chapter in the management area.

             (3) The cities, counties, and tribe may choose as the basis for local participation on the planning unit under this chapter a new planning group tailored to the specific geographic area for which integrated watershed management will be developed. The cities, counties, and tribe shall ensure that the members of the planning unit represent diverse interests, and shall include the interests represented by a planning unit that would be appointed under subsections (5)(a) through (g) and (12) of this section. If the cities, counties, and tribe designate a new planning group as the basis for local participation on the planning unit, the new group plus the membership specified in subsection (5)(j) of this section and any membership provided under subsection (5)(i) of this section, which provide for representation by state and tribal governments, constitute the planning unit for developing integrated watershed management under this chapter in the management area.

             (4) If an existing or new group is designated under subsection (2) or (3) of this section as the basis for local participation on the planning unit, the group and therefore the planning unit it is a part of: Shall have membership positions that directly represent cities in whole or in part in the management area and these positions shall be clearly identified as such; and shall have membership positions that directly represent counties with territory in the WRIAs that make up the management area and these positions shall be clearly identified as such. The cities, counties, and tribe designating a new group as the basis for local participation on the planning unit may identify a subcommittee structure for the planning unit, but the authorities granted to a planning unit by this chapter may only be exercised by the full planning unit. Any of the cities or counties that are entitled to have a membership position on the planning unit may choose not to participate in the planning unit.

             (5) Unless a planning unit is created as provided in subsection (2) or (3) of this section, the planning unit that develops integrated watershed management in a single WRIA management area under this chapter shall be composed of the following:

             (a) One member representing each county with territory in the WRIA appointed by the county;

             (b) One member representing cities for each county with territory in the WRIA appointed by the cities within that county;

             (c) One member representing water supply utilities for each county with territory within the WRIA, appointed jointly by the three largest water supply utilities in the county;

             (d) One member representing all conservation districts with territory within the WRIA appointed jointly by those districts;

             (e) Three members representing major interests in the WRIA appointed jointly by the cities with territory within the WRIA; three members representing major interests in the WRIA appointed jointly by the counties with territory within the WRIA; and three members representing major interests in the WRIA, appointed jointly by the cities and counties with territory within the WRIA;

             (f) One member representing the general citizenry appointed jointly by the cities with territory within the WRIA;

             (g) One member representing the general citizenry appointed jointly by the counties with territory in the WRIA;

             (h) Two members representing the general citizenry appointed jointly by the cities and counties, one of whom shall be a holder of a water right certificate and one of whom shall be a holder of a water right for which a statement of claim was in the state's water rights claims registry before January 1, 1997;

             (i) If one or more federal Indian reservations, other than the initiating tribe, if there is one, are located in whole or in part within the boundaries of the management area, or if one or more Indian tribes located in this state have federally recognized ceded land within the management area or fishing rights recognized under federal case law on lands within the management area, the planning unit shall promptly extend an invitation to the tribal government of each such reservation to appoint one member representing that tribal government and to the tribal government of each such Indian tribe to appoint one member representing that tribe; and

             (j) One member representing each of the following state agencies: The department of transportation, the department of fish and wildlife, the department of ecology, and the department of natural resources.

             (6) The four members representing state agencies under subsection (5)(j) of this section shall have a total of two votes in any voting done by the planning unit. One of these votes shall be shared by the department of natural resources and the department of fish and wildlife; the other vote shall be shared by the department of ecology and the department of transportation. Of these members, the governor shall appoint one lead state representative whose duty it is to ensure that state government ultimately speaks with one voice in developing integrated watershed management under this chapter, to coordinate the state's participation on the planning unit, and to secure and coordinate under section 15 of this act the technical assistance provided by the state to the planning unit.

             (7) In addition, for a WRIA located within Pierce, King, Snohomish, or Spokane county, one representative of the water purveyor using the largest amount of water from the WRIA shall be a voting member of the planning unit whether the principal offices of the purveyor are or are not located within the WRIA.

             (8) Unless a planning unit is created as provided in subsection (2) or (3) of this section, the planning unit that develops integrated watershed management in a multi-WRIA management area under this chapter shall be composed of the following:

             (a) One member representing each county with territory in the multi-WRIA area appointed by that county;

             (b) One member representing cities for each county with territory in the multi-WRIA area appointed by the cities within that county;

             (c) One member representing water supply utilities for each county with territory within the multi-WRIA area appointed jointly by the three largest water supply utilities in each county;

             (d) Up to two members, as that number is determined by the districts, representing all conservation districts with territory within the multi-WRIA area and appointed jointly by those districts;

             (e) Three members representing major interests in the management area appointed jointly by the cities with territory within the multi-WRIA area; three members representing major interests in the management area appointed jointly by the counties with territory within the multi-WRIA area; and three members representing major interests in the management area appointed jointly by the cities and counties with territory within the multi-WRIA area;

             (f) One member representing the general citizenry appointed jointly by the cities with territory within the multi-WRIA area;

             (g) One member representing the general citizenry appointed jointly by the counties with territory in the multi-WRIA area;

             (h) Two members representing the general citizenry appointed jointly by the cities and the counties, one of whom shall be a holder of a water right certificate and one of whom shall be a holder of a water right for which a statement of claim was in the state's water rights claims registry before January 1, 1997;

             (i) If one or more federal Indian reservations, other than the initiating tribe if there is one, are located in whole or in part within the boundaries of the management area, or if one or more Indian tribes located in this state have federally recognized ceded land within the management area or fishing rights recognized under federal case law on lands within the management area, the planning unit shall promptly extend an invitation to the tribal government of each such reservation to appoint one member representing that tribal government and to the tribal government of each such Indian tribe to appoint one member representing that tribe; and

             (j) One member representing each of the following state agencies: The department of transportation, the department of fish and wildlife, the department of ecology, and the department of natural resources.

             (9) The four members representing state agencies under subsection (8)(j) of this section shall have a total of two votes in any voting done by the planning unit. One of these votes shall be shared by the department of natural resources and the department of fish and wildlife; the other vote shall be shared by the department of ecology and the department of transportation. Of these members, the governor shall appoint one lead state representative whose duty it is to ensure that state government ultimately speaks with one voice in developing integrated watershed management under this chapter, to coordinate the state's participation on the planning unit, and to secure and coordinate under section 15 of this act the technical assistance provided by the state to the planning unit.

             (10) In addition, for a multi-WRIA planning unit located within Pierce, King, Snohomish, or Spokane county, one representative of the water purveyor using the largest amount of water from the multi-WRIA area shall be a voting member of the planning unit whether the principal offices of the purveyor are or are not located within the multi-WRIA area.

             (11) Each planning unit may invite representatives of federal agencies with jurisdiction over the subject matter for which integrated watershed management is being developed by the unit and the managers of major federal lands located within the management area to assist the planning unit by participating in the development of integrated watershed management by the unit under this chapter. Such representatives shall not be considered to be voting members of the planning unit.

             (12) In appointing persons to a planning unit representing major interests in the management area, the cities and counties shall ensure that economic and environmental interests and instream and out-of-stream interests in water, in the management area are represented. In doing so, the cities and counties shall consult with each other regarding the representation each is providing and may consider industrial water users, general businesses, hydroelectric and thermal power producers, and irrigated agriculture, nonirrigated agriculture, forestry, recreation, environmental, and recreational and commercial fisheries interest groups, and other groups with interests in the management area.

             (13) If a single WRIA or multi-WRIA management area does not contain a city within its boundaries, the county shall make all the appointments that a city would make under this section.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. DECISIONS--HEARINGS--APPROVAL. (1) The planning unit shall attempt to achieve consensus among the members of the planning unit in developing the components of its proposed integrated watershed management under section 5, 7, or 8 of this act.

             (2) Decisions regarding setting minimum instream flows shall be made as described in section 6 of this act. Whether the minimum instream flows set for streams in the management area are or are not added as an express component of the planning unit's integrated watershed management for the management area may be determined by the planning unit, but adding or not adding the component does not affect the decisions made under section 6 of this act regarding minimum instream flows.

             (3) As part of its integrated watershed management, the planning unit may choose to develop drafts of state administrative rules and local ordinances that would be needed to give force and effect to the parts of its integrated watershed management that would create rights or obligations for any party. If it so chooses, it may also request the appropriate state agencies, units of tribal government, and units of local government to assist it in drafting the rules and ordinances. If the planning unit requests a state agency to provide such assistance, the state agency shall provide the assistance.

             (4)(a) Upon completing its proposed integrated watershed management for the management area, the planning unit shall publish notice of and conduct at least one public hearing in each county in the management area on the proposal. The planning unit shall take care to provide notice of the hearing throughout the management area. As a minimum, the notice shall be published in one or more newspapers of general circulation in the management area. After considering the public comments and making any changes in its proposal, the planning unit may approve the proposal by the process provided for in (b) and (c) of this subsection.

             (b)(i) The department and the tribal government with federal Indian reservation land located within the management area shall provide advice as to any specific subsections or sections of the watershed management that the department or tribe believes to be in conflict with state or federal law, and may provide other recommendations regarding the watershed management. The department or tribe shall transmit its advice and recommendations within forty-five days of receiving it for review. The planning unit shall consider each recommendation provided by the department under this subsection. The planning unit may adopt the recommendation or provide changes to respond to the advice of the department or tribe by achieving approval by a vote of the members of the planning unit.

             (ii) If the planning unit fails to adopt the department's or tribal council's recommendations regarding provisions of the watershed management that conflict with state or federal law, the department and the planning unit shall submit the dispute to mediation. If mediation does not resolve the dispute within forty-five days, the department shall file a petition for declaratory judgment in the superior court of the county with the largest area in the WRIA or multi-WRIA governed by the watershed management. The superior court shall review the dispute under the error of law standard. If the superior court finds that a component of the plan conflicts with state or federal law, that component of the plan is invalid. Decisions on such petitions are reviewable as in other civil cases. This subsection shall not be construed to establish state liability for any other element of the watershed management adopted as rules.

             (c) Approval among the members of the planning unit is achieved if the members of the planning unit present for a recorded vote on the proposal appointed to represent the state through the shared ballot process described in section 10 (6) and (9) of this act, each appointed to represent tribal government with federal Indian reservation land located in the WRIA, each appointed to represent directly counties, each appointed to represent water supply utilities, each appointed to represent conservation districts, and each appointed to represent directly cities records his or her support for the proposed integrated watershed management as part of a recorded vote on the proposal.

             (d) Approval among the members of the planning unit appointed to represent major interests in the management area and general citizenry components of the planning unit is achieved if a majority of the members of the planning unit, other than those described in (b) of this subsection, present at the recorded vote on the proposal records support for the integrated watershed management as a part of the recorded vote.

             (e) If the watershed management is approved by the planning unit, the unit shall submit the watershed management to the counties with territory within the management area.

             (f) If the watershed management is not approved by the planning unit following a vote, then the planning unit shall submit the watershed management to mediation in an attempt to achieve agreement between the members of the planning unit. If the unit is unable to reach an agreement that will achieve approval within forty-five days after submitting the dispute to mediation, the planning unit may either submit the components of the watershed management in which agreement was achieved to the county for approval or terminate the process.

             (5) The legislative authority of each of the counties with territory within the management area shall provide public notice for and conduct at least one public hearing in each county on the approved watershed management submitted to the county under this section. The counties shall take care to provide notice of the hearings throughout the management area. As a minimum, the notice shall be published in one or more newspapers of general circulation in the management area. After the public hearings, the legislative authorities of these counties shall convene in joint session to consider the watershed management. The counties may approve or reject the watershed management, but may not amend it. Approval of a watershed management or of recommendations for a watershed management that are not approved shall be made by a majority vote of the members of the legislative authorities of each of the counties with territory in the management area.

             (6) If the watershed management is not approved by the counties, it shall be returned to the planning unit with recommendations for revisions. If the revisions are approved by the planning unit, the watershed management shall be returned to the county for adoption. Approval of such a revised proposal shall be made in the same manner provided for the original integrated watershed management. If the revisions are not approved by the planning unit, the planning unit and the counties shall submit the revisions to mediation in an attempt to reach an agreement that will achieve approval by the planning unit and the counties. If approval of the planning unit is achieved after mediation, the watershed management shall be returned to the county for adoption. If the planning unit is unable to achieve agreement following mediation, it may either submit the components of the watershed management in which agreement was achieved to the county for approval or terminate the process. The department shall proceed with adopting the approved watershed management through a rules adoption process described in RCW 90.82.040(8).

             (7) Before the adoption of the watershed management by the county legislative authority, the county shall transmit a copy of the watershed management to each city located in the WRIA. The cities shall hold a public hearing on the watershed management. The city shall publish notice of the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least three days before the hearing. The city has forty-five days after receiving the watershed management from the county to consider passage of a resolution that expresses agreement with the watershed management or express any concerns with the watershed management with the county.

             (8) At a minimum, the planning unit shall not add a component to its integrated watershed management that creates an obligation for state government unless the members of the planning unit appointed to represent state government agree to adding the component; it shall not add a component that creates an obligation for a tribal government unless the member or members of the planning unit appointed to represent that tribal government agree to adding the component; it shall not add a component that creates an obligation for a county, city, conservation district, or water supply utility unless the members of the planning unit appointed to represent the county, city, conservation district, or water supply utility agree to adding the component. A member's agreeing to add a component shall be evidenced by a recorded vote of all members of the planning unit in which the members record support for adding the component. If integrated watershed management is approved by the planning unit and the counties for a management area under this section and that management creates obligations for agencies of state government, the obligations are binding on the state agencies and the agencies shall adopt implementing rules and take other actions to fulfill their obligations as soon as possible.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. MEMBERSHIP--OTHER RULES. (1) A vacancy on a planning unit shall be filled by appointment in the same manner prescribed for appointing the position that has become vacant. The planning unit shall not interrupt its work to await additional original appointments or appointments to fill any vacancies that may occur in its membership.

             (2) No person who is a member of a planning unit for a management area under this chapter may designate another to act on behalf of the person as a member or to attend as a member a meeting of the unit on behalf of the person. If a member of such a planning unit is absent from more than five meetings of the planning unit that constitute twenty percent or more of the meetings that have been conducted by the planning unit while the person is a member of the unit.

             (3) For the purposes of this chapter, a county or conservation district is considered to have territory within a management area only if the territory of the county or district located in one of the WRIA's in the management area constitutes at least fifteen percent of the area of the WRIA.


             Sec. 13. RCW 90.82.040 and 1997 c 442 s 105 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) ((Once a WRIA planning unit has been organized and designated a lead agency, it shall notify the department and may apply to the department for funding assistance for conducting the planning. Funds shall be provided from and to the extent of appropriations made by the legislature to the department expressly for this purpose.

             (2) Each planning unit that has complied with subsection (1) of this section is eligible to receive fifty thousand dollars for each WRIA to initiate the planning process. The department shall allocate additional funds to WRIA planning units based on need demonstrated by a detailed proposed budget submitted by the planning unit for carrying out the duties of the planning unit. Each WRIA planning unit may receive up to two hundred fifty thousand dollars for each WRIA during the first two-year period of planning, with a maximum allocation of five hundred thousand dollars for each WRIA.)) The department shall develop and administer a grant program to provide direct financial assistance to planning units for the preparation of integrated watershed management under this chapter. Three separate grants may be awarded pursuant to this section. These grants are initial organizing grants, grants for watershed assessments and establishment of instream flows, and grants for the development of integrated watershed management and implementation. The total amount of the grants may not exceed five hundred thousand dollars for each WRIA. The department may not impose any local matching fund requirement as a condition for grant eligibility or as a preference for receiving a grant.

             (2) An initial organizing grant of up to fifty thousand dollars may be awarded to a lead agency that applies to the department and indicates that integrated watershed management is to be developed under this chapter. Organizing grants may be expended for any purpose authorized by the department, including but not limited to determining the scope of work to be addressed by the integrated watershed management for the management area; collecting and reviewing relevant studies and plans that already exist for the watershed, including growth management related plans in which critical areas have been designated pursuant to chapter 36.70A RCW; determining how the integrated watershed management for a management area can be coordinated with existing studies and plans; and baseline monitoring of water within the watershed.

             (3)(a) A watershed assessment grant of up to two hundred thousand dollars for each WRIA may be awarded to a planning unit that certifies to the department that it adequately represents a broad range of interests within the watershed, and that it is willing to undertake the following as part of its integrated watershed management for its management area: Integrated watershed management for the protection or enhancement of habitat, integrated watershed management for water quantity, or integrated watershed management for water quality. The planning unit must submit a detailed proposed budget that demonstrates the need for the grant.

             (b) Grants awarded pursuant to this subsection (3) shall be awarded for a four-year period. The four-year time period shall begin to run when the lead agency for the planning unit first received the initial organizing grant under subsection (2) of this section. For a planning unit that did not submit an application for an initial organizing grant, the four-year time period shall begin to run when the planning unit receives a grant under this subsection (3).

             (4) A management development, instream flow, and implementation grant in an amount of up to two hundred fifty thousand dollars for each WRIA may be awarded to a planning unit that submits evidence that an assessment of the watershed has been adequately prepared in sufficient detail for the purposes for which the watershed assessment grant was awarded; the integrated watershed management that will be developed for the management area will not be in conflict with federal laws, state statutes, or tribal treaty rights; and its development will be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions for purposes of minimum instream flows and water quality, if water quality was addressed as part of the watershed assessment. The planning unit must submit a detailed proposed budget that demonstrates the need for the grant. Any moneys awarded from the remaining grant balance for implementation in a management area under this section are available only for implementation that commences after integrated watershed management has been adopted for the area under section 11 of this act.

             (5)(a) The department shall use the following eligibility criteria instead of rules when evaluating grant applications at each stage of the grants program:

             (i) The application has documented that the planning unit meets all of the requirements of this chapter;

             (ii) The application demonstrates a need for state planning funds to accomplish the objectives of the planning process; and

             (iii) The application and supporting information evidences a readiness to proceed.

             (b) In ranking grant applications submitted at each stage of the grants program except for the initial organizing grant under subsection (2) of this section, the department shall give preference to applications in the following order of priority:

             (i) Applications from existing planning groups that have been in existence for at least one year;

             (ii) Applications from multi-WRIAs that propose to address protection and enhancement of fish habitat in watersheds that have aquatic species listed as endangered or threatened under the federal endangered species act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq. and for which there is evidence of an inability to supply adequate water for population and economic growth;

             (iii) Applications from single WRIAs that propose to address protection and enhancement of fish habitat in watersheds that have aquatic species listed as endangered or threatened under the federal endangered species act, and for which there is evidence of an inability to supply adequate water for population and economic growth;

             (iv) Applications from multi-WRIAs that propose to address protection and enhancement of fish habitat in watersheds that have aquatic species listed as endangered or threatened under the federal endangered species act; and

             (v) Applications from single WRIAs that propose to address protection and enhancement of fish habitat in watersheds that have aquatic species listed under the federal endangered species act.

             (6) Funding provided under this section shall be considered a contractual obligation against the moneys appropriated for this purpose.

             (((3) Preference shall be given to planning units requesting funding for conducting multi-WRIA planning under section 108 of this act.

             (4))) (7) The department may retain up to one percent of funds allocated under this section to defray administrative costs.

             (8) The department may adopt its implementing rules for an integrated watershed management that have been approved by counties as part of integrated watershed management and may adopt rules when necessary to implement this section or section 6(2) of this act either by the regular rules adoption process provided in chapter 34.05 RCW, the expedited rules adoption process as set forth in RCW 34.05.230, or through a rules adoption process that uses the public hearings and notice provided by the planning unit and the county legislative authority as a substitute for the rules adoption requirements of chapter 34.05 RCW. If the planning unit and county legislative authority hearings and notice are used as a substitute for the regular rules adoption process, the rules do not take effect until they are published in the Washington state register as provided in chapter 34.05 RCW. Such rules do not constitute significant legislative rules as defined in RCW 34.05.328, and do not require the preparation of small business economic impact statements.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 14. A new section is added to chapter 34.05 RCW to read as follows:

             Rules adopted by the department of ecology pursuant to RCW 90.82.040(8) are exempt from the requirements of this chapter to the extent provided in RCW 90.82.040(8).


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 15. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE. (1) The lead state representative on a planning unit designated under section 10(5)(j) of this act shall establish a program to provide technical assistance to planning units and local governments to encourage and facilitate the adoption and implementation of integrated watershed management for management areas developed under this chapter. The program shall use existing requirements or standards that must be satisfied by the integrated watershed management developed under this chapter and no part of the program may have the effect of a rule adopted under chapter 34.05 RCW.

             (2) The program shall use any staff assigned by the governor for this task, the staff of state agencies, and staff from institutions of higher education to assist in the development of integrated watershed management under this chapter, including but not limited to assistance in determining and explaining how best available science will be incorporated into integrated watershed management for a management area, developing methods for effectively monitoring performance, providing the criteria that represents acceptable performance for key elements of the integrated watershed management for a management area, and the method of reporting performance to the public, local communities, and the state. In providing assistance under this section, the lead state representative shall recognize regional and local variations that exist in different parts of the state.

             (3) The lead state representative on a planning unit shall assist planning units in ensuring that integrated watershed management developed under this chapter is coordinated with, and consistent with, the integrated watershed management of other planning units that share common borders or major stream basins. The state shall provide mediation services to resolve disputes between planning units.

             (4) The department may contract out technical assistance if the lead state representative finds that it is cost-effective and will assist in implementing the intent of this chapter.

             (5) The department shall conduct an annual workshop for planning units to share successful approaches, as well as difficulties, in addressing specific problems within watersheds.

             (6) All state agencies with rule-making authority for programs that affect the development and implementation of integrated watershed management developed under this chapter shall review those rules and programs for consistency with this chapter and make recommendations to the legislature for any necessary statutory changes.


             Sec. 16. RCW 90.03.345 and 1979 ex.s. c 216 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The establishment of reservations of water for agriculture, hydroelectric energy, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial uses under RCW 90.54.050(1) or minimum flows or levels under RCW 90.22.010 or 90.54.040 shall constitute appropriations within the meaning of this chapter with priority dates as of the effective dates of their establishment. Whenever an application for a permit to make beneficial use of public waters embodied in a reservation, established after September 1, 1979, is filed with the department of ecology after the effective date of such reservation, the priority date for a permit issued pursuant to an approval by the department of ecology of the application shall be the effective date of the reservation.

             (2) Minimum flows established under section 6 of this act shall have a priority date as specified in that section.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 17. Captions used in this act are not part of the law.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. Sections 4 through 12, and 15 of this act are each added to chapter 90.82 RCW.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately."


             On page 1, line 1 of the title, after "management;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 90.82.005, 90.82.010, 90.82.020, 90.82.040, and 90.03.345; adding a new section to chapter 34.05 RCW; adding new sections to chapter 90.82 RCW; creating a new section; and declaring an emergency."


             Representative Chandler moved the adoption of amendment (989) to the striking amendment (985):


             On page 6, line 10 of the amendment, after "commenced" strike "under other laws or that are authorized" and insert "or authorized under other laws"


             On page 6, line 28 of the amendment, after "of" strike "a habitat conservation plan and permit, an incidental take permit or" and insert "an approved habitat conservation plan and an incidental take permit, an incidental take"


             On page 8, line 13 of the amendment, after "location" insert "of"


             On page 10, line 18 of the amendment, after "streams." insert "The department shall have two years to establish the instream flows for these streams by rule if approval is not achieved within the four-year period provided under this subsection (3)."


             On page 10, line 21 of the amendment, after "section" insert ", including minimum instream flows established by the department under this subsection when approval is not achieved,"


             On page 13, line 20 of the amendment, after "area;" insert "(b) the county with the largest area bordering on the main stem of the stream with the largest annual flow, not including the Columbia or Snake rivers, within the boundaries of a single or multi-WRIA;"

Reletter the remaining subsections consecutively.


             On page 13, line 23 of the amendment, after "diverting" strike "and withdrawing"


             On page 13, line 26, after "area." strike everything down to and including "chapter." on line 32


             On page 13, line 33 of the amendment, after "jointly" strike "an" and insert "and"


             On page 15, line 4 of the amendment, after "the" strike everything down to and including "(8)" on line 5 and insert "initiating governments as defined in subsection (3)"


             On page 15, line 10 of the amendment, after "of the" strike everything down to and including "(8)" on line 11 and insert "initiating governments as defined in subsection (3)"


             On page 15, line 13 of the amendment, after "If" strike "these cities, counties, and Indian tribes" and insert "initiating governments"


             On page 15, line 18 of the amendment, after "The" strike everything down to and including "(7)" on line 19 and insert "initiating governments as defined in subsection (3)"


             On page 16, line 17 of the amendment, after "in" strike "subsection (5)" and insert "subsections (5) through (10), and (12) and (13)"


             On page 18, line 18 of the amendment, after "reservations," strike "other than" and insert "including"


             On page 20, line 1 of the amendment, after "reservations," strike "other than" and insert "including"


             On page 25, line 19 of the amendment, after "unit" insert ", the member’s position on the planning unit is vacated"


             On page 30, after line 31 of the amendment, insert the following"

             "NEW SECTION. Sec. 20. If specific funding for the purposes of this act, referencing this act by bill or chapter number, is not provided by June 30, 1998, in the omnibus appropriations act, this act is null and void."


             Representatives Chandler and Linville spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment to the striking amendment.


             The amendment to the amendment was adopted.


             Representative Schoesler moved the adoption of amendment (1001) to the striking amendment (985):


             Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:


             "Sec. 1. RCW 90.82.005 and 1997 c 442 s 101 are each amended to read as follows:

             The purpose of this chapter is to develop a ((more)) thorough and cooperative method ((of)) that provides local citizens the maximum possible input for: Determining what the current water resource situation is in each water resource inventory area of the state and ((to provide local citizens with the maximum possible input concerning their)) establishing goals and objectives for water resource management and development; reviewing water quality problems and recommending strategies for achieving compliance with water quality standards; and coordinating with any plans for the protection and enhancement of fish habitat.

             It is necessary for the legislature to establish processes and policies that will result in providing state agencies with more specific guidance to manage the water resources of the state consistent with current law and direction provided by local entities and citizens through the process established in accordance with this chapter.

             It is the intent of this chapter to provide locally based groups with the opportunity to: Assess local water supplies and needs and develop strategies to provide adequate water for economic prosperity and environmental protection while protecting existing water rights; ensure that adequate water supplies are available for population and economic growth under the requirements of the state's growth management act, chapter 36.70A RCW; review water quality problems and develop a strategy for achieving compliance with water quality standards; and coordinate plans for protection and enhancement of fish habitat.

             Chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (this act) is enacted to: Improve the ability of local governments and citizens to be involved in the design and implementation of solutions to water quantity, water quality, and habitat needs for fish species and provide an opportunity for people in all watersheds to be involved in watershed planning if they so desire; provide a flexible mechanism for conducting locally initiated watershed planning on either a single watershed basis or, if more appropriate, on a multiple watershed basis; and allow local people to determine the scope of the watershed planning process while encouraging them to consider comprehensive watershed planning that includes addressing water quantity, water quality, and habitat for fish species in concert with one another.

             Thus it is the intent of the legislature for integrated watershed management to help produce: Adequate water quantity for the future, adequate water quality to protect and promote beneficial uses, and sufficient protection and enhancement of habitat so that fish resources thrive to be used and enjoyed by citizens of the state.

             It is also the intent of the legislature to encourage collaboration and cooperation between the wide range of interests, and local, state, federal, and tribal governments to develop solutions to watershed problems. The state of Washington wishes to recognize and maintain formal government-to-government relationships, and it also endeavors to work cooperatively with all governmental entities and representatives of citizen groups to foster effective and practical solutions that have broad-based support. It is the intent of the legislature that all of the citizens of the state of Washington work cooperatively to ensure that the management of the state's economic destiny and environmental heritage remains in the hands of Washington's citizens as much as possible.

             Nothing in this chapter may be construed as affecting or impairing existing water or property rights.


             Sec. 2. RCW 90.82.010 and 1997 c 442 s 102 are each amended to read as follows:

             The legislature finds that the state's vital interests are served by the wise management of the state's water resources, by protecting existing water rights and dependent economies, by protecting and enhancing instream flows and habitat for fish, and by providing for the public health and economic well-being of the state's citizenry and communities. The legislature finds that many regions of the state are facing challenges relating to water quantity, water quality, and habitat for fish species. There are a number of bodies of water in the state that do not meet federal and state water quality standards. In several areas of the state, there has been a significant decrease in the number of fish returning to state waters and there is a growing sense of urgency to protect and enhance existing fishery resources. The pressures of a growing population and expanding economy have led some local communities to seek additional water supplies for present and future needs and to seek certainty that the supplies will be available for those needs.

             The legislature finds that the local development of watershed plans for managing water resources ((and)), for protecting existing water rights and dependent economies, and for protecting and enhancing habitat for fish is vital to both state and local interests. The local development of these plans serves vital local interests by placing it in the hands of people: Who have the greatest knowledge of both the resources and the aspirations of those who live and work in the watershed; and who have the greatest stake in the proper, long-term management of the resources. The development of such plans serves the state's vital interests by ensuring that the state's water resources are used wisely, by protecting existing water rights and dependent economies, by protecting instream flows for fish, by protecting or enhancing fish habitat, and by providing for the economic well-being of the state's citizenry and communities. Therefore, the legislature believes it necessary for units of local government throughout the state to engage in the orderly development of these watershed plans.

             The legislature finds that water resource and fish habitat challenges vary from region to region. The legislature also finds that, in many cases, addressing one water resource or fishery habitat issue can cause concerns and have effects in other areas; as a result, integrated watershed management may be needed to address the variety of these challenges simultaneously.

             The legislature further recognizes that considerable effort for addressing many of the challenges is represented by the work, planning, projects, and activities that have already been completed by local interests regarding watershed management or have been initiated and are in various stages of completion. The legislature finds that, if new, integrated watershed management is to be initiated, it must begin with a thorough review of these completed or ongoing efforts and should incorporate their products as appropriate so as not to duplicate the work already performed or underway.

             Although these challenges may require approaches that are integrated and comprehensive, the legislature finds that considerable authority currently exists to address these issues but that such authority is spread across an array of federal, state, tribal, and local governments. Integration and coordination of such authorities in ways that have support of state, local, and tribal interests will be needed to develop and implement multi-interest and comprehensive solutions. The legislature further finds that new state and federal regulatory regimes are by and large not necessary to develop good watershed management and that local authorities in particular provide a broad array of implementation tools to support good watershed management. However, the legislature finds that the key to meeting existing regulatory objectives is the involvement and support of local citizens and local governments working cooperatively with state, federal, and tribal governments. The legislature recognizes that it is unable to provide all the funding necessary for integrated watershed management to be developed throughout the entire state at once, and that as a result, watershed management will be phased in across the state over time, and that the state has an ongoing responsibility to provide funding for the watershed management described in this chapter.


             Sec. 3. RCW 90.82.020 and 1997 c 442 s 103 are each amended to read as follows:

             Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.

             (1) "City" means an incorporated city, code city, or town.

             (2) "Department" means the department of ecology.

             (((2))) (3) "Implementing rules" for ((a WRIA plan)) integrated watershed management developed by a planning unit are the rules needed to give force and effect to the parts of the ((plan)) integrated watershed management that create rights or obligations for ((any party including)) a state agency ((or that establish water management policy)).

             (((3))) (4) "Indian tribe" means any Indian tribe, band, or nation that: (a) is recognized as eligible, by the secretary of the interior, for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians; and (b) is recognized as possessing powers of self-government.

             (5) "Lead agency" means the entity identified under section 9 of this act that makes provision for administrative staff support for and receives grants for a planning unit developing integrated watershed management under this chapter.

             (6) "Management area" means the WRIA or the multiple WRIA area for which integrated watershed management is developed by a planning unit under this chapter.

             (7) "Minimum instream flows" means ((a minimum)) flows that meet the requirements of minimum flows under chapter 90.03 or 90.22 RCW ((or a)) and base flows under chapter 90.54 RCW as adopted by rule.

             (((4))) (8) "Planning unit" means a planning unit established under section 10 of this act.

             (9) "WRIA" means a water resource inventory area established in chapter 173-500 WAC as it existed on January 1, 1997.

             (((5))) (10) "Water supply utility" means a ((water, combined)) water-sewer district, irrigation district, reclamation district, or public utility district that provides water to persons or other water users within the district or a division or unit responsible for administering a publicly governed water supply system on behalf of a county.

             (((6) "WRIA plan" or "plan)) (11) "Integrated watershed management" means the product of the planning unit ((including)) and includes the plan of the planning unit approved under section 11 of this act, any rules adopted in conjunction with the ((product)) plan of the planning unit, and strategies of the planning unit for implementing its plan.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. ELEMENTS OF MANAGEMENT--PRIORITY PROJECTS. (1) Counties, cities, and water supply utilities may, at their option, provide for the development of integrated watershed management for watersheds under this chapter. If initiated, such management shall be developed for water quantity components of water resource management under section 5 of this act, water quality components of water resource management under section 7 of this act, and the coordination of protection or enhancement of fish habitat under section 8 of this act. If integrated watershed management is initiated under this chapter, minimum instream flows shall be established for streams in the management area as provided in section 6 of this act. It is anticipated that a planning unit will not await the development of proposals for minimum instream flows under section 6 of this act to begin developing other components of its integrated watershed management for a management area; rather, work on these developments will be undertaken concurrently.

             (2) Under this chapter, integrated watershed management may be developed by a planning unit for one or more WRIAs, but may not be developed by a planning unit for less than one WRIA except for those watersheds planned as pilot projects in the Methow and Dungeness/Quilcene areas before the effective date of this section. This chapter may not be construed to prevent or delay any planning, projects, or activities that are commenced under other laws or that are authorized.

             (3) Integrated watershed management developed and approved under this chapter shall not contain provisions that (a) are in conflict with state statutes, federal laws, or tribal treaty rights, existing on the effective date of this section; (b) impair or diminish in any manner an existing water right evidenced by a claim filed in the water rights claims registry or a water right certificate or permit; (c) require a modification in the basic operations of a federal reclamation project with a water right the priority date of which is before the effective date of this section or alter in any manner whatsoever the quantity of water available under the water right for the reclamation project, whether the project has or has not been completed before the effective date of this section; (d) affect or interfere with an ongoing general adjudication of water rights; (e) apply in an area with an acreage expansion program in effect on the effective date of this section that is an element of a ground water area or subarea management program as provided in RCW 90.44.445; (f) in any way delay the processing of requests for changes in place of water use, purpose of use, or point of diversion; (g) modify or require the modification of any waste discharge permit issued under chapter 90.48 RCW; or (h) modify or require the modification of activities or actions taken to protect or enhance fish habitat if the activities or actions are: (i) Part of a habitat conservation plan and permit, an incidental take permit or statement, a management or recovery plan, or other cooperative or conservation agreement entered into with a federal or state fish and wildlife protection agency under its statutory authority for fish and wildlife protection that addresses the affected habitat; or (ii) part of an agreement regulating forest practices, which is adopted by rule by the forest practices board under the forest practices act, chapter 76.09 RCW, for the affected habitat. This subsection (3)(h) applies as long as the activities or actions continue to be taken in accordance with the plan, agreement, permit, statement, or rules. Any assessment conducted under section 5, 7, or 8 of this act shall take into consideration such activities and actions.

             (4) Integrated watershed management developed and approved under this chapter shall not change existing local ordinances or existing state rules, but it may contain recommendations for changing such ordinances or rules.

             (5) Once a planning unit has begun developing integrated watershed management under this chapter, the unit shall, as a matter of high priority:

             (a) Review the historical geographic characteristics of the management area, and also review the planning, projects, and activities that have already been completed regarding natural resource management or enhancement in the management area and the products or status of those that have been initiated but not completed for such management in the management area, and incorporate their products as appropriate so as not to duplicate the work already performed or underway; and

             (b) Identify projects and activities in the management area that the unit believes will likely serve short-term or long-term management goals and that warrant immediate financial assistance from state, federal, or local government. The planning unit shall prioritize these projects and activities in a manner that reflects the degree to which they serve the unit's goals and the costs and the benefits of undertaking them. The unit shall submit its prioritized list to the local governments with jurisdiction and, through the lead state representative on the planning unit designated under section 10(5)(j) of this act, to the legislature and the appropriate state agencies.

             (6) Integrated watershed management planning conducted under sections 5, 7, and 8 of this act shall identify within the management area the actions and activities that are necessary to: Implement the provisions of the integrated watershed management, monitor the effectiveness of the implementation, and provide any needed modifications. It shall also identify the entities responsible for conducting these actions and activities. It shall also identify any entity responsible for the coordinated oversight of these responsibilities.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. WATER QUANTITY. Integrated watershed management established for water quantity in the management area shall include an assessment of water supply and use in the management area, including:

             (1) An estimate of the surface and ground water present in the management area;

             (2) An estimate of the surface and ground water available in the management area, taking into account seasonal and other variations;

             (3) An estimate of the water in the management area represented by claims in the water rights claims registry, water use permits, certificated rights, rights granted under section 17 of this act, existing minimum instream flow rules, federally reserved rights, and any other rights to water;

             (4) An estimate of the surface and ground water actually being used in the management area;

             (5) An estimate of the water needed in the future for use in the management area;

             (6) An identification of the location areas where aquifers are known to recharge surface bodies of water and areas known to provide for the recharge of aquifers from the surface;

             (7) An estimate of the surface and ground water available for further appropriation, taking into account the minimum instream flows adopted by rule or to be adopted by rule for streams in the management area; and

             (8) Strategies for increasing water supplies in the management area, which may include, but are not limited to, increasing water supplies through water conservation, water reuse, the use of reclaimed water, voluntary water transfers, aquifer recharge and recovery, additional water allocations, or water storage enhancements. The objective of these strategies is to supply water in sufficient quantities to satisfy the minimum instream flows and to provide water for future out-of-stream uses for water identified in subsection (5) of this section and to ensure that adequate water supplies are available for population and economic growth under the requirements of the state's growth management act, chapter 36.70A RCW. These strategies shall not be construed to be an allocation of water. If integrated watershed management is established by a planning unit under this section for water quantity components of water resource management in a management area and that management is approved by the counties under section 11 of this act but does not contain the strategies required under this subsection, all components of integrated watershed management established by the planning unit under this chapter are void.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. INSTREAM FLOWS. (1)(a) Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, minimum instream flows shall be established by rule for the principal stream or streams in the WRIA or multiple WRIA area for which integrated watershed management is developed by a planning unit under this chapter. At the time a planning unit is chosen or created under section 10 of this act or initial appointments are made by cities and counties under section 10 of this act, the cities and counties in a management area may decide, as described in section 9(9) of this act, that the planning unit will not participate in identifying such flows in the management area, in which case they shall request the department to adopt rules establishing the minimum instream flows for the principle stream or streams in the management area.

             (b) In all other management areas after considering in detail the assessment provided in section 5 of this act, identifying the flow regimes that make up the minimum instream flows shall be a collaborative effort between the department and the members of the planning unit developing the integrated watershed management. As these flows are developed, it shall be the duty of the department to attempt to achieve consensus among all of the members of the planning unit regarding the minimum flows to be adopted by rule by the department. Approval is achieved if:

             (i) The members of the planning unit present for a recorded vote on the proposed minimum instream flows who have been appointed to represent the state through the shared ballot process described in section 10 (6) and (9) of this act, each appointed to represent tribal governments with federal Indian reservations or federally recognized ceded lands located in whole or in part within the management area or fishing rights recognized under federal case law on lands within the management area, each appointed to represent directly counties, each appointed to represent directly cities, each appointed to represent directly conservation districts, and each appointed to represent directly water supply utilities records his or her support for the proposed minimum instream flows as part of the recorded vote or abstains from voting on the proposal; and

             (ii) A majority of the members of the planning unit, other than those who have been appointed to represent the entities identified in (b)(i) of this subsection, who are present for a recorded vote on proposed minimum instream flows, records support for the proposed minimum instream flows as part of the recorded vote on the proposal.

             That such a recorded vote will be taken on proposed minimum instream flows shall be announced at the official meeting of the planning unit immediately preceding the official meeting of the unit at which the vote is recorded and a notice regarding voting on proposed minimum instream flows shall be sent to each member appointed to the planning unit as soon as possible following the meeting at which such an announcement is made.

             (2) If approval of the planning unit is achieved on minimum instream flows proposed for a management area under subsection (1) of this section, the department shall establish those flows by rule as described in RCW 90.82.040(8).

             (3) If approval is not achieved under subsection (1) of this section within four years of the date the planning unit first receives funding from the department under RCW 90.82.040, the department may promptly initiate rule making under chapter 34.05 RCW to establish minimum instream flows for these streams. If the planning unit did not achieve approval on establishing minimum instream flows, the planning unit may submit the vote on instream flows to the department for its consideration. Minimum flows established under this section shall have a priority date of two years after the planning unit first received funding from the department under RCW 90.82.040.

             (4) If minimum instream flows have been adopted by rule for a stream in the management area and the cities and counties do not, under section 9 of this act, request the planning unit or the department to modify those flows, minimum instream flows for the stream shall not be modified for the stream under this chapter. If the cities and counties request, under section 9 of this act, that the planning unit modify the minimum instream flows for the stream but approval is not achieved under this section for modifying those flows, minimum instream flows shall not be modified for the stream under this chapter.

             (5) Nothing in this chapter either: (a) Affects the department's authority to establish flow requirements or other conditions under RCW 90.48.260 or the federal clean water act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.) for the licensing or relicensing of a hydroelectric power project under the federal power act (16 U.S.C. Sec. 791 et seq.); or (b) affects or impairs existing instream flow requirements and other conditions in a current license for a hydroelectric power project licensed under the federal power act.

             (6) Minimum instream flows shall not be proposed or adopted for the main stem of the Columbia river or the main stem of the Snake river under this chapter.

             (7) A planning unit may consider identifying how minimum instream flows could be modified in response to the successful implementation of other elements of the integrated watershed management.

             (8) As used in this section, the "principal stream or streams" are, in a management area for which the department is requested by cities and counties to adopt minimum instream flows under subsection (1)(a) of this section, the streams determined by the department to be the principal stream or streams. In any other management area, the "principal stream or streams" are the main stem of the stream with the largest annual average flow in each WRIA in the management area; and the major tributaries to such a main stem and any other streams in the management area that are determined to be principal streams by the planning unit by a majority vote of the planning unit. "Principal stream or streams" does not include streambeds that are used as laterals for irrigation and are nonfish-bearing.

             (9) Nothing in this chapter may be construed as affecting or impairing in any manner whatsoever water rights existing before the effective date of this section.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. WATER QUALITY. Integrated watershed management established for water quality in the management area shall include the following components:

             (1) An examination based on existing studies conducted by federal, state, and local agencies of the degree to which legally established water quality standards are being met in the management area;

             (2) An examination based on existing studies conducted by federal, state, and local agencies of the causes of water quality violations in the management area, including an examination of information regarding pollutants, point and nonpoint sources of pollution, and pollution-carrying capacities of water bodies in the management area. The analysis shall take into account seasonal stream flow or level variations, natural events, and pollution from natural sources that occurs independent of human activities;

             (3) An examination of the uses of each of the nonmarine bodies of water in the management area and an identification of the beneficial uses of each for water quality classification purposes;

             (4) An identification of the class of use for nonmarine bodies of water and for basin-specific water quality standards that may be adopted by rule by the department and recommendations for the water quality standards to be adopted for those bodies of water;

             (5) A recommended strategy for achieving compliance with water quality standards for the nonmarine bodies of water in the management area; and

             (6) Recommended means of monitoring by appropriate government agencies whether actions taken to implement the strategy bring about improvements in water quality that are sufficient to achieve compliance with water quality standards.

             This chapter does not obligate the state to undertake analysis or to develop strategies required under the federal clean water act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.).


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. HABITAT. Integrated watershed management shall be coordinated, or as needed, developed to protect or enhance fish habitat in the management area by relying on existing laws and rules adopted under habitat planning processes such as the habitat work plans prepared under chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (Substitute House Bill No. 2496) and other existing plans created for the purpose of protecting, restoring, or enhancing fish habitat, the shoreline management act, chapter 90.58 RCW, the growth management act, chapter 36.70A RCW, and the forest practices act, chapter 76.09 RCW. Management established under this section shall be integrated with strategies developed under other processes to respond to potential and actual listings of salmon and other fish species as being threatened or endangered under the federal endangered species act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq. Integrated watershed management developed for such purposes shall include the following components:

             (1) An analysis of the potential for protecting or enhancing fish habitat in the management area;

             (2) An identification of fish habitat protection or enhancement activities and projects and voluntary transactions, including but not limited to those providing for the purchase of fish habitat or fish habitat easements, that would provide the greatest benefit to such habitat in the management area. Where habitat work plans developed under chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (Substitute House Bill No. 2496) are available or are intended to be developed, the planning shall rely on those plans;

             (3) Recommended means of ensuring that the activities, projects, and transactions identified under subsection (2) of this section will be undertaken. Where habitat work plans developed under chapter . . ., Laws of 1998 (Substitute House Bill No. 2496) are available or are intended to be developed, the planning shall rely on those plans; and

             (4) Recommended means of monitoring the effect of undertaking the activities, projects, and transactions identified under subsection (2) of this section on protecting or enhancing fish habitat in the management area.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. INITIATING INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT. The following is the procedure by which the development of integrated watershed management may be initiated under this chapter.

             (1) The following entities may decide that integrated watershed management should be considered: (a) The county with the largest area within the boundaries of a single WRIA or multi-WRIA proposed management area; (b) the city, if there is one, within the proposed management area using the largest amount of water from within the proposed management area; (c) the city, if there is one, cumulatively diverting and withdrawing the largest amount of water from within the proposed management area; and (d) the water supply utility, if there is one, that provides the largest quantity of water in the proposed management area. However, the county with the largest area bordering on the main stem of the stream with the largest annual flow, not including the Columbia or Snake rivers, within the boundaries of a WRIA, the city obtaining the largest amount of water from the WRIA, and the largest water supply utility in the WRIA may jointly and unanimously choose to initiate watershed management for the WRIA under this chapter.

             (2) If entities in subsection (1) of this section decide jointly an unanimously to proceed, they shall invite the Indian tribe, if there is one, with the largest reservation within the proposed management area to participate in integrated watershed management.

             (3) The entities in subsection (1) of this section, including the tribe if it affirmatively accepts the invitation, constitute the initiating governments for the purposes of this section.

             (4) On behalf of the initiating governments, the county with the largest area within the boundaries of the proposed management area shall convene a public meeting in the affected area to discuss the appointment of a planning unit for developing integrated watershed management under this chapter. Notices of the meeting shall be sent to:

             (a) County governments with territory in the proposed management area;

             (b) The cities of each county located in and cities that receive water from the proposed management area;

             (c) Tribal governments of federal Indian reservations or federally recognized ceded lands located in whole or in part within the boundaries of the proposed management area;

             (d) Water supply utilities located in and water supply utilities that receive water from the proposed management area;

             (e) Conservation districts with territory in the proposed management area;

             (f) Groups and entities that have been or are currently engaged in public planning processes within the proposed management area that involve water quantity, water quality, or habitat restoration activities. In providing this notice, the county shall make a reasonable attempt to identify and notify groups and entities that within the last five years have been or are currently engaged in such planning; and

             (g) The department, which shall notify other appropriate state agencies, appropriate Indian tribes, and appropriate federal agencies.

             The notice shall contain the purpose, time, and location of the meeting. The notice shall also be published at least once a week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the proposed management area. The notice that is published in the newspaper shall invite members of the general public to participate.

             (5) The purpose of the public meeting is to obtain comments regarding initiating the development of integrated watershed management under this chapter, the coordination of that process with ongoing planning processes and activities in the watershed, and the creation of a planning unit to prepare the integrated watershed management.

             (6) For developing integrated watershed management under this chapter, the county with the largest area within the boundaries of the proposed management area is the lead agency for the development of the integrated watershed management, unless the cities, counties, and Indian tribes described in subsection (8) of this section approve the designation of another governmental agency as the lead agency. Such a governmental agency shall act as the lead agency for this purpose if it agrees in writing to accept the designation.

             (7) At or following the public meeting, the county that convened the meeting shall call for a vote of the cities, counties, and Indian tribes described in subsection (8) of this section as to whether to proceed with the development of integrated watershed management under this chapter in the proposed management area. If these cities, counties, and Indian tribes approve proceeding with the development of such management, the lead agency shall make application to the department for funding to develop integrated watershed management under this chapter.

             (8) The cities, counties, and Indian tribes that may make decisions under subsections (6) and (7) of this section may choose the type of planning unit to be used for developing integrated watershed management under this chapter in the proposed management area under section 10 of this act.

             (9) At the time a planning unit is chosen or created under section 10 of this act or initial appointments are made by cities and counties under section 10 of this act, the cities and counties in a management area may: (a) Decide that the planning unit will not participate in identifying such flows in the management area, in which case they shall request the department to adopt rules establishing the minimum instream flows for the principal stream or streams in the management area; or (b) if minimum instream flows have been adopted by rule for a stream in the management area, request either the planning unit or the department to modify those flows. To approve an action for these purposes, the cities must approve the action by majority vote, with each city having one vote, and the counties must approve the action by unanimous vote, with each county having one vote. The vote of each city and each county shall be the vote assigned directly, in person or in writing, by the elected officials of the city and directly, in person or in writing, by the members of the legislative authority of the county. For this purpose, the "elected officials" of a city are the members of the city's legislative authority and, if applicable, its elected mayor.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. PLANNING UNIT--APPOINTMENT--OPTIONS. (1) If the initiating governments approve proceeding with the development of integrated watershed management for a management area as described in section 9(7) of this act, the development of such management will be conducted under this chapter in the single WRIA or multiple WRIA management area by one planning unit. As provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, the cities, counties, and tribe may choose an existing planning group as the basis for local representation on the planning unit or they may identify the composition of a new group as the basis for local representation on the planning unit. Such a choice shall be made as described in section 9(9) of this act. If the cities, counties, and tribe do not choose such an existing or new group in this manner, the planning unit to be used for developing the integrated watershed management for the management area is the planning unit specified in subsection (5) of this section.

             (2) If the cities, counties, and tribe choose an existing planning group as the basis for local representation on a planning unit, the planning group shall have been in existence for at least one year before being so chosen. To be considered, the representation of governmental entities and interest groups on such a planning group must be generally similar to the representation identified in subsections (5)(a) through (g) and (12) of this section, or the planning group shall have a statutorily specified membership. If the cities, counties, and tribe find that the existing group has the required composition and find that the scope of the group's work is or has been appropriate considering the tasks to be given the planning unit under this chapter, the cities, counties, and tribe may designate the group as the basis for local participation on the planning unit. The existing group chosen in this manner plus the membership specified in subsection (5)(j) of this section and any membership provided under subsection (5)(i) of this section, which provide for representation by state and tribal governments, constitute the planning unit for developing integrated watershed management under this chapter in the management area.

             (3) The cities, counties, and tribe may choose as the basis for local participation on the planning unit under this chapter a new planning group tailored to the specific geographic area for which integrated watershed management will be developed. The cities, counties, and tribe shall ensure that the members of the planning unit represent diverse interests, and shall include the interests represented by a planning unit that would be appointed under subsections (5)(a) through (g) and (12) of this section. If the cities, counties, and tribe designate a new planning group as the basis for local participation on the planning unit, the new group plus the membership specified in subsection (5)(j) of this section and any membership provided under subsection (5)(i) of this section, which provide for representation by state and tribal governments, constitute the planning unit for developing integrated watershed management under this chapter in the management area.

             (4) If an existing or new group is designated under subsection (2) or (3) of this section as the basis for local participation on the planning unit, the group and therefore the planning unit it is a part of: Shall have membership positions that directly represent cities in whole or in part in the management area and these positions shall be clearly identified as such; and shall have membership positions that directly represent counties with territory in the WRIAs that make up the management area and these positions shall be clearly identified as such. The cities, counties, and tribe designating a new group as the basis for local participation on the planning unit may identify a subcommittee structure for the planning unit, but the authorities granted to a planning unit by this chapter may only be exercised by the full planning unit. Any of the cities or counties that are entitled to have a membership position on the planning unit may choose not to participate in the planning unit.

             (5) Unless a planning unit is created as provided in subsection (2) or (3) of this section, the planning unit that develops integrated watershed management in a single WRIA management area under this chapter shall be composed of the following:

             (a) One member representing each county with territory in the WRIA appointed by the county;

             (b) One member representing cities for each county with territory in the WRIA appointed by the cities within that county;

             (c) One member representing water supply utilities for each county with territory within the WRIA, appointed jointly by the three largest water supply utilities in the county;

             (d) One member representing all conservation districts with territory within the WRIA appointed jointly by those districts;

             (e) Three members representing major interests in the WRIA appointed jointly by the cities with territory within the WRIA; three members representing major interests in the WRIA appointed jointly by the counties with territory within the WRIA; and three members representing major interests in the WRIA, appointed jointly by the cities and counties with territory within the WRIA;

             (f) One member representing the general citizenry appointed jointly by the cities with territory within the WRIA;

             (g) One member representing the general citizenry appointed jointly by the counties with territory in the WRIA;

             (h) Two members representing the general citizenry appointed jointly by the cities and counties, one of whom shall be a holder of a water right certificate and one of whom shall be a holder of a water right for which a statement of claim was in the state's water rights claims registry before January 1, 1997;

             (i) If one or more federal Indian reservations, other than the initiating tribe, if there is one, are located in whole or in part within the boundaries of the management area, or if one or more Indian tribes located in this state have federally recognized ceded land within the management area or fishing rights recognized under federal case law on lands within the management area, the planning unit shall promptly extend an invitation to the tribal government of each such reservation to appoint one member representing that tribal government and to the tribal government of each such Indian tribe to appoint one member representing that tribe; and

             (j) One member representing each of the following state agencies: The department of transportation, the department of fish and wildlife, the department of ecology, and the department of natural resources.

             (6) The four members representing state agencies under subsection (5)(j) of this section shall have a total of two votes in any voting done by the planning unit. One of these votes shall be shared by the department of natural resources and the department of fish and wildlife; the other vote shall be shared by the department of ecology and the department of transportation. Of these members, the governor shall appoint one lead state representative whose duty it is to ensure that state government ultimately speaks with one voice in developing integrated watershed management under this chapter, to coordinate the state's participation on the planning unit, and to secure and coordinate under section 15 of this act the technical assistance provided by the state to the planning unit.

             (7) In addition, for a WRIA located within Pierce, King, Snohomish, or Spokane county, one representative of the water purveyor using the largest amount of water from the WRIA shall be a voting member of the planning unit whether the principal offices of the purveyor are or are not located within the WRIA.

             (8) Unless a planning unit is created as provided in subsection (2) or (3) of this section, the planning unit that develops integrated watershed management in a multi-WRIA management area under this chapter shall be composed of the following:

             (a) One member representing each county with territory in the multi-WRIA area appointed by that county;

             (b) One member representing cities for each county with territory in the multi-WRIA area appointed by the cities within that county;

             (c) One member representing water supply utilities for each county with territory within the multi-WRIA area appointed jointly by the three largest water supply utilities in each county;

             (d) Up to two members, as that number is determined by the districts, representing all conservation districts with territory within the multi-WRIA area and appointed jointly by those districts;

             (e) Three members representing major interests in the management area appointed jointly by the cities with territory within the multi-WRIA area; three members representing major interests in the management area appointed jointly by the counties with territory within the multi-WRIA area; and three members representing major interests in the management area appointed jointly by the cities and counties with territory within the multi-WRIA area;

             (f) One member representing the general citizenry appointed jointly by the cities with territory within the multi-WRIA area;

             (g) One member representing the general citizenry appointed jointly by the counties with territory in the multi-WRIA area;

             (h) Two members representing the general citizenry appointed jointly by the cities and the counties, one of whom shall be a holder of a water right certificate and one of whom shall be a holder of a water right for which a statement of claim was in the state's water rights claims registry before January 1, 1997;

             (i) If one or more federal Indian reservations, other than the initiating tribe if there is one, are located in whole or in part within the boundaries of the management area, or if one or more Indian tribes located in this state have federally recognized ceded land within the management area or fishing rights recognized under federal case law on lands within the management area, the planning unit shall promptly extend an invitation to the tribal government of each such reservation to appoint one member representing that tribal government and to the tribal government of each such Indian tribe to appoint one member representing that tribe; and

             (j) One member representing each of the following state agencies: The department of transportation, the department of fish and wildlife, the department of ecology, and the department of natural resources.

             (9) The four members representing state agencies under subsection (8)(j) of this section shall have a total of two votes in any voting done by the planning unit. One of these votes shall be shared by the department of natural resources and the department of fish and wildlife; the other vote shall be shared by the department of ecology and the department of transportation. Of these members, the governor shall appoint one lead state representative whose duty it is to ensure that state government ultimately speaks with one voice in developing integrated watershed management under this chapter, to coordinate the state's participation on the planning unit, and to secure and coordinate under section 15 of this act the technical assistance provided by the state to the planning unit.

             (10) In addition, for a multi-WRIA planning unit located within Pierce, King, Snohomish, or Spokane county, one representative of the water purveyor using the largest amount of water from the multi-WRIA area shall be a voting member of the planning unit whether the principal offices of the purveyor are or are not located within the multi-WRIA area.

             (11) Each planning unit may invite representatives of federal agencies with jurisdiction over the subject matter for which integrated watershed management is being developed by the unit and the managers of major federal lands located within the management area to assist the planning unit by participating in the development of integrated watershed management by the unit under this chapter. Such representatives shall not be considered to be voting members of the planning unit.

             (12) In appointing persons to a planning unit representing major interests in the management area, the cities and counties shall ensure that economic and environmental interests and instream and out-of-stream interests in water, in the management area are represented. In doing so, the cities and counties shall consult with each other regarding the representation each is providing and may consider industrial water users, general businesses, hydroelectric and thermal power producers, and irrigated agriculture, nonirrigated agriculture, forestry, recreation, environmental, and recreational and commercial fisheries interest groups, and other groups with interests in the management area.

             (13) If a single WRIA or multi-WRIA management area does not contain a city within its boundaries, the county shall make all the appointments that a city would make under this section.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. DECISIONS--HEARINGS--APPROVAL. (1) The planning unit shall attempt to achieve consensus among the members of the planning unit in developing the components of its proposed integrated watershed management under section 5, 7, or 8 of this act.

             (2) Decisions regarding setting minimum instream flows shall be made as described in section 6 of this act. Whether the minimum instream flows set for streams in the management area are or are not added as an express component of the planning unit's integrated watershed management for the management area may be determined by the planning unit, but adding or not adding the component does not affect the decisions made under section 6 of this act regarding minimum instream flows.

             (3) As part of its integrated watershed management, the planning unit may choose to develop drafts of state administrative rules and local ordinances that would be needed to give force and effect to the parts of its integrated watershed management that would create rights or obligations for any party. If it so chooses, it may also request the appropriate state agencies, units of tribal government, and units of local government to assist it in drafting the rules and ordinances. If the planning unit requests a state agency to provide such assistance, the state agency shall provide the assistance.

             (4)(a) Upon completing its proposed integrated watershed management for the management area, the planning unit shall publish notice of and conduct at least one public hearing in each county in the management area on the proposal. The planning unit shall take care to provide notice of the hearing throughout the management area. As a minimum, the notice shall be published in one or more newspapers of general circulation in the management area. After considering the public comments and making any changes in its proposal, the planning unit may approve the proposal by the process provided for in (b) and (c) of this subsection.

             (b)(i) The department and the tribal government with federal Indian reservation land located within the management area shall provide advice as to any specific subsections or sections of the watershed management that the department or tribe believes to be in conflict with state or federal law, and may provide other recommendations regarding the watershed management. The department or tribe shall transmit its advice and recommendations within forty-five days of receiving it for review. The planning unit shall consider each recommendation provided by the department under this subsection. The planning unit may adopt the recommendation or provide changes to respond to the advice of the department or tribe by achieving approval by a vote of the members of the planning unit.

             (ii) If the planning unit fails to adopt the department's or tribal council's recommendations regarding provisions of the watershed management that conflict with state or federal law, the department and the planning unit shall submit the dispute to mediation. If mediation does not resolve the dispute within forty-five days, the department shall file a petition for declaratory judgment in the superior court of the county with the largest area in the WRIA or multi-WRIA governed by the watershed management. The superior court shall review the dispute under the error of law standard. If the superior court finds that a component of the plan conflicts with state or federal law, that component of the plan is invalid. Decisions on such petitions are reviewable as in other civil cases. This subsection shall not be construed to establish state liability for any other element of the watershed management adopted as rules.

             (c) Approval among the members of the planning unit is achieved if the members of the planning unit present for a recorded vote on the proposal appointed to represent the state through the shared ballot process described in section 10 (6) and (9) of this act, each appointed to represent tribal government with federal Indian reservation land located in the WRIA, each appointed to represent directly counties, each appointed to represent water supply utilities, each appointed to represent conservation districts, and each appointed to represent directly cities records his or her support for the proposed integrated watershed management as part of a recorded vote on the proposal.

             (d) Approval among the members of the planning unit appointed to represent major interests in the management area and general citizenry components of the planning unit is achieved if a majority of the members of the planning unit, other than those described in (b) of this subsection, present at the recorded vote on the proposal records support for the integrated watershed management as a part of the recorded vote.

             (e) If the watershed management is approved by the planning unit, the unit shall submit the watershed management to the counties with territory within the management area.

             (f) If the watershed management is not approved by the planning unit following a vote, then the planning unit shall submit the watershed management to mediation in an attempt to achieve agreement between the members of the planning unit. If the unit is unable to reach an agreement that will achieve approval within forty-five days after submitting the dispute to mediation, the planning unit may either submit the components of the watershed management in which agreement was achieved to the county for approval or terminate the process.

             (5) The legislative authority of each of the counties with territory within the management area shall provide public notice for and conduct at least one public hearing in each county on the approved watershed management submitted to the county under this section. The counties shall take care to provide notice of the hearings throughout the management area. As a minimum, the notice shall be published in one or more newspapers of general circulation in the management area. After the public hearings, the legislative authorities of these counties shall convene in joint session to consider the watershed management. The counties may approve or reject the watershed management, but may not amend it. Approval of a watershed management or of recommendations for a watershed management that are not approved shall be made by a majority vote of the members of the legislative authorities of each of the counties with territory in the management area.

             (6) If the watershed management is not approved by the counties, it shall be returned to the planning unit with recommendations for revisions. If the revisions are approved by the planning unit, the watershed management shall be returned to the county for adoption. Approval of such a revised proposal shall be made in the same manner provided for the original integrated watershed management. If the revisions are not approved by the planning unit, the planning unit and the counties shall submit the revisions to mediation in an attempt to reach an agreement that will achieve approval by the planning unit and the counties. If approval of the planning unit is achieved after mediation, the watershed management shall be returned to the county for adoption. If the planning unit is unable to achieve agreement following mediation, it may either submit the components of the watershed management in which agreement was achieved to the county for approval or terminate the process. The department shall proceed with adopting the approved watershed management through a rules adoption process described in RCW 90.82.040(8).

             (7) Before the adoption of the watershed management by the county legislative authority, the county shall transmit a copy of the watershed management to each city located in the WRIA. The cities shall hold a public hearing on the watershed management. The city shall publish notice of the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least three days before the hearing. The city has forty-five days after receiving the watershed management from the county to consider passage of a resolution that expresses agreement with the watershed management or express any concerns with the watershed management with the county.

             (8) At a minimum, the planning unit shall not add a component to its integrated watershed management that creates an obligation for state government unless the members of the planning unit appointed to represent state government agree to adding the component; it shall not add a component that creates an obligation for a tribal government unless the member or members of the planning unit appointed to represent that tribal government agree to adding the component; it shall not add a component that creates an obligation for a county, city, conservation district, or water supply utility unless the members of the planning unit appointed to represent the county, city, conservation district, or water supply utility agree to adding the component. A member's agreeing to add a component shall be evidenced by a recorded vote of all members of the planning unit in which the members record support for adding the component. If integrated watershed management is approved by the planning unit and the counties for a management area under this section and that management creates obligations for agencies of state government, the obligations are binding on the state agencies and the agencies shall adopt implementing rules and take other actions to fulfill their obligations as soon as possible.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. MEMBERSHIP--OTHER RULES. (1) A vacancy on a planning unit shall be filled by appointment in the same manner prescribed for appointing the position that has become vacant. The planning unit shall not interrupt its work to await additional original appointments or appointments to fill any vacancies that may occur in its membership.

             (2) No person who is a member of a planning unit for a management area under this chapter may designate another to act on behalf of the person as a member or to attend as a member a meeting of the unit on behalf of the person. If a member of such a planning unit is absent from more than five meetings of the planning unit that constitute twenty percent or more of the meetings that have been conducted by the planning unit while the person is a member of the unit.

             (3) For the purposes of this chapter, a county or conservation district is considered to have territory within a management area only if the territory of the county or district located in one of the WRIA's in the management area constitutes at least fifteen percent of the area of the WRIA.


             Sec. 12. RCW 90.82.040 and 1997 c 442 s 105 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) ((Once a WRIA planning unit has been organized and designated a lead agency, it shall notify the department and may apply to the department for funding assistance for conducting the planning. Funds shall be provided from and to the extent of appropriations made by the legislature to the department expressly for this purpose.

             (2) Each planning unit that has complied with subsection (1) of this section is eligible to receive fifty thousand dollars for each WRIA to initiate the planning process. The department shall allocate additional funds to WRIA planning units based on need demonstrated by a detailed proposed budget submitted by the planning unit for carrying out the duties of the planning unit. Each WRIA planning unit may receive up to two hundred fifty thousand dollars for each WRIA during the first two-year period of planning, with a maximum allocation of five hundred thousand dollars for each WRIA.)) The department shall develop and administer a grant program to provide direct financial assistance to planning units for the preparation of integrated watershed management under this chapter. Three separate grants may be awarded pursuant to this section. These grants are initial organizing grants, grants for watershed assessments and establishment of instream flows, and grants for the development of integrated watershed management and implementation. The total amount of the grants may not exceed five hundred thousand dollars for each WRIA. The department may not impose any local matching fund requirement as a condition for grant eligibility or as a preference for receiving a grant.

             (2) An initial organizing grant of up to fifty thousand dollars may be awarded to a lead agency that applies to the department and indicates that integrated watershed management is to be developed under this chapter. Organizing grants may be expended for any purpose authorized by the department, including but not limited to determining the scope of work to be addressed by the integrated watershed management for the management area; collecting and reviewing relevant studies and plans that already exist for the watershed, including growth management related plans in which critical areas have been designated pursuant to chapter 36.70A RCW; determining how the integrated watershed management for a management area can be coordinated with existing studies and plans; and baseline monitoring of water within the watershed.

             (3)(a) A watershed assessment grant of up to two hundred thousand dollars for each WRIA may be awarded to a planning unit that certifies to the department that it adequately represents a broad range of interests within the watershed, and that it is willing to undertake the following as part of its integrated watershed management for its management area: Integrated watershed management for the protection or enhancement of habitat, integrated watershed management for water quantity, or integrated watershed management for water quality. The planning unit must submit a detailed proposed budget that demonstrates the need for the grant.

             (b) Grants awarded pursuant to this subsection (3) shall be awarded for a four-year period. The four-year time period shall begin to run when the lead agency for the planning unit first received the initial organizing grant under subsection (2) of this section. For a planning unit that did not submit an application for an initial organizing grant, the four-year time period shall begin to run when the planning unit receives a grant under this subsection (3).

             (4) A management development, instream flow, and implementation grant in an amount of up to two hundred fifty thousand dollars for each WRIA may be awarded to a planning unit that submits evidence that an assessment of the watershed has been adequately prepared in sufficient detail for the purposes for which the watershed assessment grant was awarded; the integrated watershed management that will be developed for the management area will not be in conflict with federal laws, state statutes, or tribal treaty rights; and its development will be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions for purposes of minimum instream flows and water quality, if water quality was addressed as part of the watershed assessment. The planning unit must submit a detailed proposed budget that demonstrates the need for the grant. Any moneys awarded from the remaining grant balance for implementation in a management area under this section are available only for implementation that commences after integrated watershed management has been adopted for the area under section 11 of this act.

             (5)(a) The department shall use the following eligibility criteria instead of rules when evaluating grant applications at each stage of the grants program:

             (i) The application has documented that the planning unit meets all of the requirements of this chapter;

             (ii) The application demonstrates a need for state planning funds to accomplish the objectives of the planning process; and

             (iii) The application and supporting information evidences a readiness to proceed.

             (b) In ranking grant applications submitted at each stage of the grants program except for the initial organizing grant under subsection (2) of this section, the department shall give preference to applications in the following order of priority:

             (i) Applications from existing planning groups that have been in existence for at least one year;

             (ii) Applications from multi-WRIAs that propose to address protection and enhancement of fish habitat in watersheds that have aquatic species listed as endangered or threatened under the federal endangered species act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq. and for which there is evidence of an inability to supply adequate water for population and economic growth;

             (iii) Applications from single WRIAs that propose to address protection and enhancement of fish habitat in watersheds that have aquatic species listed as endangered or threatened under the federal endangered species act, and for which there is evidence of an inability to supply adequate water for population and economic growth;

             (iv) Applications from multi-WRIAs that propose to address protection and enhancement of fish habitat in watersheds that have aquatic species listed as endangered or threatened under the federal endangered species act; and

             (v) Applications from single WRIAs that propose to address protection and enhancement of fish habitat in watersheds that have aquatic species listed under the federal endangered species act.

             (6) Funding provided under this section shall be considered a contractual obligation against the moneys appropriated for this purpose.

             (((3) Preference shall be given to planning units requesting funding for conducting multi-WRIA planning under section 108 of this act.

             (4))) (7) The department may retain up to one percent of funds allocated under this section to defray administrative costs.

             (8) The department may adopt its implementing rules for an integrated watershed management that have been approved by counties as part of integrated watershed management and may adopt rules when necessary to implement this section or section 6(2) of this act either by the regular rules adoption process provided in chapter 34.05 RCW, the expedited rules adoption process as set forth in RCW 34.05.230, or through a rules adoption process that uses the public hearings and notice provided by the planning unit and the county legislative authority as a substitute for the rules adoption requirements of chapter 34.05 RCW. If the planning unit and county legislative authority hearings and notice are used as a substitute for the regular rules adoption process, the rules do not take effect until they are published in the Washington state register as provided in chapter 34.05 RCW. Such rules do not constitute significant legislative rules as defined in RCW 34.05.328, and do not require the preparation of small business economic impact statements.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 13. A new section is added to chapter 34.05 RCW to read as follows:

             Rules adopted by the department of ecology pursuant to RCW 90.82.040(8) are exempt from the requirements of this chapter to the extent provided in RCW 90.82.040(8).


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 14. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE. (1) The lead state representative on a planning unit designated under section 10(5)(j) of this act shall establish a program to provide technical assistance to planning units and local governments to encourage and facilitate the adoption and implementation of integrated watershed management for management areas developed under this chapter. The program shall use existing requirements or standards that must be satisfied by the integrated watershed management developed under this chapter and no part of the program may have the effect of a rule adopted under chapter 34.05 RCW.

             (2) The program shall use any staff assigned by the governor for this task, the staff of state agencies, and staff from institutions of higher education to assist in the development of integrated watershed management under this chapter, including but not limited to assistance in determining and explaining how best available science will be incorporated into integrated watershed management for a management area, developing methods for effectively monitoring performance, providing the criteria that represents acceptable performance for key elements of the integrated watershed management for a management area, and the method of reporting performance to the public, local communities, and the state. In providing assistance under this section, the lead state representative shall recognize regional and local variations that exist in different parts of the state.

             (3) The lead state representative on a planning unit shall assist planning units in ensuring that integrated watershed management developed under this chapter is coordinated with, and consistent with, the integrated watershed management of other planning units that share common borders or major stream basins. The state shall provide mediation services to resolve disputes between planning units.

             (4) The department may contract out technical assistance if the lead state representative finds that it is cost-effective and will assist in implementing the intent of this chapter.

             (5) The department shall conduct an annual workshop for planning units to share successful approaches, as well as difficulties, in addressing specific problems within watersheds.

             (6) All state agencies with rule-making authority for programs that affect the development and implementation of integrated watershed management developed under this chapter shall review those rules and programs for consistency with this chapter and make recommendations to the legislature for any necessary statutory changes.


             Sec. 15. RCW 90.03.345 and 1979 ex.s. c 216 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The establishment of reservations of water for agriculture, hydroelectric energy, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial uses under RCW 90.54.050(1) or minimum flows or levels under RCW 90.22.010 or 90.54.040 shall constitute appropriations within the meaning of this chapter with priority dates as of the effective dates of their establishment. Whenever an application for a permit to make beneficial use of public waters embodied in a reservation, established after September 1, 1979, is filed with the department of ecology after the effective date of such reservation, the priority date for a permit issued pursuant to an approval by the department of ecology of the application shall be the effective date of the reservation.

             (2) Minimum flows established under section 6 of this act shall have a priority date as specified in that section.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 16. A new section is added to chapter 90.03 RCW to read as follows:

             If a person placed surface or ground water to beneficial use for irrigation or stock watering purposes before January 1, 1993, for which a permit or certificate was not issued by the department or its predecessors, the person or the person's successor holds a water right for that use in the amount beneficially used and with a priority date that is the date a statement of claim is filed for the right under this section if:

             (1) The person or the person's successor files with the department a statement of claim for the right during the period beginning September 1, 1998, and ending midnight June 30, 1999, using the standard form prescribed by RCW 90.14.051;

             (2) The person or the person's successor has used the water to the full extent stated in the statement of claim during at least each of three of the five years preceding the date the statement is filed and the person attests to having done so on the statement; and

             (3) The person or the person's successor files with the statement of claim evidence that the water described in the claim was used beneficially before January 1, 1993, in the form of any two of the following:

             (a) A statement signed by two persons other than the person filing the statement of claim verifying that the water was beneficially used by the claimant before January 1, 1993, as described in the statement of claim;

             (b) A copy of a dated photograph clearly demonstrating the presence of grass or a crop requiring irrigation in the amounts asserted in the statement of claim or of livestock requiring water in such amounts; or records of receipts of the sale of crops by the person or the person's successor indicating that irrigation in the amount claimed was required to produce the crops;

             (c) Receipts or records of irrigation or stockwatering equipment purchases or repairs associated with the water use specified in the statement of claim;

             (d) Water well construction records identifying the date the well specified in the statement of claim as the point of withdrawal was constructed;

             (e) Records of electricity bills directly associated with the withdrawal of water as specified in the statement of claim;

             (f) Personal records such as photographs, journals, or correspondence indicating the use of water as asserted in the statement of claim.

             A right granted under this section shall not affect or impair in any respect whatsoever a water right existing prior to September 1, 1998. A right granted under this section shall be junior in every respect to a right with a more senior date of priority. No right granted under this section may be exercised in a manner that impairs or interferes with a water right that is senior to it. The filing of a statement of claim under this section does not constitute an adjudication of any claim to the right to the use of waters as between the claimant and the state, or as between one or more water use claimants and another or others. A statement of claim filed under this section shall be admissible in a general adjudication of water rights as prima facie evidence of the times of use and the quantity of water the claimant was withdrawing or diverting to the same extent as is provided by RCW 90.14.081 for a statement of claim in the water rights claims registry on the effective date of this section.

             The department shall establish a registry of claims for rights conferred under this section. Statements of claim filed under this section shall be filed in the registry alphabetically, consecutively by date of filing, and by such other manner as the department deems appropriate.

             This section does not apply to ground water withdrawn in an area that is, during the period established by subsection (3) of this section, the subject of a general adjudication proceeding for water rights in superior court under RCW 90.03.110 through 90.03.245 and the proceeding applies to ground water rights. This section does not apply to surface water withdrawn in an area that is, during the period established by subsection (3) of this section, the subject of a general adjudication proceeding for water rights in superior court under RCW 90.03.110 through 90.03.245 and the proceeding applies to surface water rights.

             This section does not apply to rights embodied in a water right permit or certificate issued by the department or its predecessors, a water right represented by a claim in the water rights claims registry, created under RCW 90.14.111, prior to September 1, 1998, or a water right exempted from permit and application requirements by RCW 90.44.050.

             This section does not apply to claims for the use of water in a ground water area or subarea for which a management program adopted by the department by rule and in effect on the effective date of this section establishes acreage expansion limitations for the use of ground water.


             Sec. 17. RCW 90.03.380 and 1997 c 442 s 801 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The right to the use of water which has been applied to a beneficial use in the state shall be and remain appurtenant to the land or place upon which the same is used: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That the right may be transferred to another or to others and become appurtenant to any other land or place of use without loss of priority of right theretofore established if such change can be made without detriment or injury to existing rights. The point of diversion of water for beneficial use or the purpose of use may be changed, if such change can be made without detriment or injury to existing rights. A change in the place of use, point of diversion, and/or purpose of use of a water right to enable irrigation of additional acreage or the addition of new uses may be permitted if such change results in no increase in the annual consumptive quantity of water used under the water right. For purposes of this section, "annual consumptive quantity" means the estimated or actual annual amount of water diverted pursuant to the water right, reduced by the estimated annual amount of return flows, averaged over the most recent five-year period of continuous beneficial use of the water right. Before any transfer of such right to use water or change of the point of diversion of water or change of purpose of use can be made, any person having an interest in the transfer or change, shall file a written application therefor with the department, and the application shall not be granted until notice of the application is published as provided in RCW 90.03.280. If it shall appear that such transfer or such change may be made without injury or detriment to existing rights, the department shall issue to the applicant a certificate in duplicate granting the right for such transfer or for such change of point of diversion or of use. The certificate so issued shall be filed and be made a record with the department and the duplicate certificate issued to the applicant may be filed with the county auditor in like manner and with the same effect as provided in the original certificate or permit to divert water.

             (2) If an application for change proposes to transfer water rights from one irrigation district to another, the department shall, before publication of notice, receive concurrence from each of the irrigation districts that such transfer or change will not adversely affect the ability to deliver water to other landowners or impair the financial or operational integrity of either of the districts.

             (3) A change in place of use by an individual water user or users of water provided by an irrigation district need only receive approval for the change from the board of directors of the district if the use of water continues within the irrigation district, and when water is provided by an irrigation entity that is a member of a board of joint control created under chapter 87.80 RCW, approval need only be received from the board of joint control if the use of water continues within the area of jurisdiction of the joint board and the change can be made without detriment or injury to existing rights. The board of directors of an irrigation district may approve such a change if the board determines that the change: Will not adversely affect the district's ability to deliver water to other landowners; will not require the construction by the district of diversion or drainage facilities unless the board finds that the construction by the district is in the interest of the district; will not impair the financial or operational integrity of the district; and is consistent with the contractual obligations of the district.

             (4) Subsections (1), (2), and (3) of this section do not apply to a transfer or change governed by section 19 of this act.

             (5) This section shall not apply to trust water rights acquired by the state through the funding of water conservation projects under chapter 90.38 RCW or RCW 90.42.010 through 90.42.070.

             (6) Any right represented by an application for a water right for which a permit for water use has not been issued by the time a transfer or change is approved under this section may not be construed as being injured or detrimentally affected by the transfer or change.

             (7) The department may not initiate relinquishment proceedings under chapter 90.14 RCW regarding a water right for which an application for a transfer or change is filed under this section during the period beginning on the date the department receives the application and ending two years after the date the department approves or denies the application.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. A new section is added to chapter 90.03 RCW to read as follows:

             (1)(a) If a portion of the water governed by a water right is made surplus to the beneficial uses exercised under the right through the implementation of practices or technologies, including but not limited to conveyance practices or technologies, which are more efficient or more water-use efficient than those under which the right was perfected, the right to use the surplus water may be changed as provided by subsection (2), (3), (4), or (5) of this section.

             (b) If a portion of the water governed by a water right is made surplus to the beneficial uses exercised under the right through a change in the crops grown under the water right, the right to use the surplus water may be changed as provided by subsection (3) of this section. This subsection (1)(b) does not apply to water supplied by an irrigation district.

             (c) This section applies only to a change of an agricultural use or portion of an agricultural use of water to an agricultural use of water.

             (2) The use within an irrigation district of water supplied by the district and made surplus as provided in subsection (1)(a) of this section shall be regulated solely as provided by the board of directors of the irrigation district. Such a use requires the approval of the board of directors of the irrigation district or must otherwise be authorized by the board. The board may approve or authorize such a use only if the use does not impair the financial or operational integrity of the district. Water supplied by an irrigation district and made surplus as provided in subsection (1)(a) of this section through actions taken by an individual water user served by the district is not available for use as a matter of right by that individual water user, but may be used by the board for the benefit of the district generally. The district's board of directors may approve or otherwise authorize under this subsection uses of such surplus water that result in the total irrigated acreage within the district exceeding the irrigated acreage recorded with the department for the district's water right if the board notifies the department of the change in the irrigated acreage within the district. Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, such a notification provides a change in the district's water right and, upon receiving the notification, the department shall revise its records for the district's right to reflect the change.

             If an irrigation district is within a federal reclamation project and the district's board of directors approves or otherwise authorizes under this subsection uses of such surplus water that result in the total irrigated acreage within the federal project exceeding the irrigated acreage recorded with the department for the federal project's water right, the board shall notify the department of the change in the irrigated acreage within the federal project. Except as provided by this subsection and subsection (5) of this section, such a notification provides a change in the federal reclamation project's water right and, upon receiving the notification, the department shall revise its records for the federal project's right to reflect the change except that the total irrigable acreage for a water right for a federal reclamation project may not exceed the total irrigable acreage authorized for the project by the United States and related repayment contracts.

             (3) The right to use water made surplus as provided in subsection (1)(a) or (b) of this section but not supplied by an irrigation district may be changed to use on other parcels of land owned by the holder of the water right that are contiguous to the parcel or parcels of land upon which the use of the water was authorized by the right before such a change. The holder of the water right shall notify the department of such a change. Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, the notification provides a change in the holder's water right and, upon receiving the notification, the department shall revise its records for the water right to reflect the change.

             (4) If a notification is provided to the department under subsection (2) or (3) of this section with regard to water made surplus and subsequently used before the effective date of this section, the change in the water right shall be made without loss of priority of the right.

             (5) If a notification is provided to the department under subsection (2) or (3) of this section with regard to water made surplus and subsequently used, and that use begins after the effective date of this section, the priority date for the use of the water made surplus under this section is the date the notification is filed with the department. When the department is notified regarding such a use under this subsection (5), the notification does not automatically provide a change in the water right holder's, irrigation district's, or reclamation project's water right. The department shall issue the holder, district, or project a temporary water use permit for the use. The term of the permit shall be for fifteen years. It is presumed that the use of water under the temporary water use permit does not impair or interfere with water rights that are senior to the water right represented by the permit. However, if at any time within the fifteen-year term of the permit the department determines that the change would impair or interfere with the use of such a senior water right, the department shall notify the holder of the temporary permit and shall file a notice of its decision with the superior court of the county in which the withdrawal of water under the right takes place. The notice provided by the department shall not stay the use of water under the temporary permit. The superior court shall review the determination of the department de novo. In such a review, the burden of proof in overcoming the presumption provided by this subsection is on the department. The presumption can be overcome only through the application of scientific data supporting the department's determination. At the conclusion of its review, the superior court shall enter a ruling canceling the temporary permit, modifying the conditions of water use under the permit, or affirming that the use of water under the permit does not interfere with water rights senior to the water rights represented by the permit. The decision of the superior court may be appealed as provided for other decisions of the court. If a court's decision modifies the conditions of water use under the permit or affirms that the use of water under the permit does not interfere with senior water rights or if the department does not provide a notice under this subsection within the fifteen-year term of the permit, the use of the water is changed as provided by the temporary permit or the court's decision and the department shall revise its records regarding the right.

             The presumption provided by this subsection does not apply with regard to a claim made by any person with a water right in superior court or on appeal of a decision of the superior court that a temporary permit or change in a water right made under this subsection impairs or interferes with the use of the person's senior water right.

             (6) If a notification is filed with the department regarding the use of water made surplus under subsection (2) or (3) of this section and that use begins after the effective date of this section, the notification shall identify the date that the use of the water made surplus begins.

             (7) The authority provided by this section to change a water right shall not be construed as authorizing the use of a junior water right in a manner that impairs or interferes with the use of a senior water right.

             (8) If a water right changed under this section is a right represented by a statement of claim in the water rights claims registry, the department's obligation to revise its records to reflect the change shall be accomplished by providing an amendment to the statement of claim to reflect the change.

             (9) This section does not apply in an area with an acreage expansion program in effect on the effective date of this section that is an element of a ground water area or subarea management program as provided in RCW 90.44.445.

             (10) Nothing in this section authorizes a change in a water right or a portion of a water right that has not been perfected through beneficial use before the change.


             Sec. 19. RCW 90.44.100 and 1997 c 316 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) After an application to, and upon the issuance by the department of an amendment to the appropriate permit or certificate of ground water right, the holder of a valid right to withdraw public ground waters may, without losing the holder's priority of right, construct wells or other means of withdrawal at a new location in substitution for or in addition to those at the original location, or the holder may change the manner or the place of use of the water.

             (2) An amendment to construct replacement or a new additional well or wells at a location outside of the location of the original well or wells or to change the manner or place of use of the water shall be issued only after publication of notice of the application and findings as prescribed in the case of an original application. Such amendment shall be issued by the department only on the conditions that: (a) The additional or replacement well or wells shall tap the same body of public ground water as the original well or wells; (b) where a replacement well or wells is approved, the use of the original well or wells shall be discontinued and the original well or wells shall be properly decommissioned as required under chapter 18.104 RCW; (c) where an additional well or wells is constructed, the original well or wells may continue to be used, but the combined total withdrawal from the original and additional well or wells shall not enlarge the right conveyed by the original permit or certificate; and (d) other existing rights shall not be impaired. The department may specify an approved manner of construction and shall require a showing of compliance with the terms of the amendment, as provided in RCW 90.44.080 in the case of an original permit.

             (3) The construction of a replacement or new additional well or wells at the location of the original well or wells shall be allowed without application to the department for an amendment. However, the following apply to such a replacement or new additional well: (a) The well shall tap the same body of public ground water as the original well or wells; (b) if a replacement well is constructed, the use of the original well or wells shall be discontinued and the original well or wells shall be properly decommissioned as required under chapter 18.104 RCW; (c) if a new additional well is constructed, the original well or wells may continue to be used, but the combined total withdrawal from the original and additional well or wells shall not enlarge the right conveyed by the original water use permit or certificate; (d) the construction and use of the well shall not interfere with or impair water rights with an earlier date of priority than the water right or rights for the original well or wells; (e) the replacement or additional well shall be located no closer than the original well to a well it might interfere with; (f) the department may specify an approved manner of construction of the well; and (g) the department shall require a showing of compliance with the conditions of this subsection (3).

             (4) This section does not apply to a transfer or change governed by section 19 of this act.

             (5) Any right represented by an application for a water right for which a permit for water use has not been issued by the time an amendment is approved under this section may not be construed as being impaired by the amendment.

             (6) The department may not initiate relinquishment proceedings under chapter 90.14 RCW regarding a water right for which an application for an amendment is filed under this section during the period beginning on the date the department receives the application and ending two years after the date the department makes a decision on the application.

             (7) As used in this section, the "location of the original well or wells" is the area described as the point of withdrawal in the original public notice published for the application for the water right for the well.


             Sec. 20. RCW 90.03.290 and 1994 c 264 s 84 are each amended to read as follows:

             When an application complying with the provisions of this chapter and with the rules ((and regulations)) of the department has been filed, the same shall be placed on record with the department, and it shall be its duty to investigate the application, and determine what water, if any, is available for appropriation, and find and determine to what beneficial use or uses it can be applied. If it is proposed to appropriate water for irrigation purposes, the department shall investigate, determine and find what lands are capable of irrigation by means of water found available for appropriation. If it is proposed to appropriate water for the purpose of power development, the department shall investigate, determine and find whether the proposed development is likely to prove detrimental to the public interest, having in mind the highest feasible use of the waters belonging to the public. If the application does not contain, and the applicant does not promptly furnish sufficient information on which to base such findings, the department may issue a preliminary permit, for a period of not to exceed three years, requiring the applicant to make such surveys, investigations, studies, and progress reports, as in the opinion of the department may be necessary. If the applicant fails to comply with the conditions of the preliminary permit, it and the application or applications on which it is based shall be automatically canceled and the applicant so notified. If the holder of a preliminary permit shall, before its expiration, file with the department a verified report of expenditures made and work done under the preliminary permit, which, in the opinion of the department, establishes the good faith, intent and ability of the applicant to carry on the proposed development, the preliminary permit may, with the approval of the governor, be extended, but not to exceed a maximum period of five years from the date of the issuance of the preliminary permit. The department shall make and file as part of the record in the matter, written findings of fact concerning all things investigated, and if it shall find that there is water available for appropriation for a beneficial use, and the appropriation thereof as proposed in the application will not impair existing rights or be detrimental to the public welfare, it shall issue a permit stating the amount of water to which the applicant shall be entitled and the beneficial use or uses to which it may be applied: PROVIDED, That where the water applied for is to be used for irrigation purposes, it shall become appurtenant only to such land as may be reclaimed thereby to the full extent of the soil for agricultural purposes. But where there is no unappropriated water in the proposed source of supply, or where the proposed use conflicts with existing rights, or threatens to prove detrimental to the public interest, having due regard to the highest feasible development of the use of the waters belonging to the public, it shall be duty of the department to reject such application and to refuse to issue the permit asked for. If the permit is refused because of conflict with existing rights and such applicant shall acquire same by purchase or condemnation under RCW 90.03.040, the department may thereupon grant such permit. Any application may be approved for a less amount of water than that applied for, if there exists substantial reason therefor, and in any event shall not be approved for more water than can be applied to beneficial use for the purposes named in the application. In determining whether or not a permit shall issue upon any application, it shall be the duty of the department to investigate all facts relevant and material to the application. If the applicant is a public water system that is a party to an existing intertie agreement, the department shall also consider the existence, nature, economics, and terms of the agreement between the intertied public water systems when making a determination on the application for new water rights by the public water system. After the department approves ((said)) the application in whole or in part and before any permit shall be issued thereon to the applicant, such applicant shall pay the fee provided in RCW 90.03.470: PROVIDED FURTHER, That in the event a permit is issued by the department upon any application, it shall be its duty to notify the director of fish and wildlife of such issuance.

             This section does not apply to transfers or changes made under section 19 of this act or to applications for transfers or changes made under RCW 90.03.380 or 90.44.100.


             Sec. 21. RCW 90.44.445 and 1993 c 99 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

             In any acreage expansion program adopted by the department as an element of a ground water management program, the authorization for a water right certificate holder to participate in the program shall be on an annual basis for the first two years. After the two-year period, the department may authorize participation for ten-year periods. The department may authorize participation for ten-year periods for certificate holders who have already participated in an acreage expansion program for two years. The department may require annual certification that the certificate holder has complied with all requirements of the program. The department may terminate the authority of a certificate holder to participate in the program for one calendar year if the certificate holder fails to comply with the requirements of the program.

             This section applies only in an area with an acreage expansion program in effect on the effective date of this amendatory section that has been adopted by the department as an element of a ground water area or subarea management program. The provisions of section 19 of this act, RCW 90.03.380, and 90.44.100 apply to transfers, changes, and amendments to permits or rights for the beneficial use of ground water in any other area.


             Sec. 22. RCW 90.03.383 and 1991 c 350 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) The legislature recognizes the value of interties for improving the reliability of public water systems, enhancing their management, and more efficiently utilizing the increasingly limited resource. Given the continued growth in the most populous areas of the state, the increased complexity of public water supply management, and the trend toward regional planning and regional solutions to resource issues, interconnections of public water systems through interties provide a valuable tool to ensure reliable public water supplies for the citizens of the state. Public water systems have been encouraged in the past to utilize interties to achieve public health and resource management objectives. The legislature finds that it is in the public interest to recognize interties existing and in use as of January 1, 1991, and to have associated water rights modified by the department of ecology to reflect current use of water through those interties, pursuant to subsection (3) of this section. The legislature further finds it in the public interest to develop a coordinated process to review proposals for interties commencing use after January 1, 1991.

             (2) For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:

             (a) "Interties" are interconnections between public water systems permitting exchange, acquisition, or delivery of wholesale and/or retail water between those systems for other than emergency supply purposes, where such exchange, acquisition, or delivery is within established instantaneous and annual withdrawal rates specified in the ((systems')) supplying system's existing water right permits or certificates, or contained in claims filed pursuant to chapter 90.14 RCW, and which results in better management of public water supply consistent with existing rights and obligations. Interties include interconnections between public water systems permitting exchange, acquisition, or delivery of water to serve as primary or secondary sources of supply, but do not include development of new sources of supply to meet future demand requiring new water right applications to and appropriations by the department of ecology. Interties also include the development of new sources of supply to meet future demands if the water system or systems receiving water through such an intertie make efficient use of existing sources of water supply and the provision of water through such an intertie is consistent with local land use plans. For this purpose, a system's full compliance with the state department of health's conservation guidelines for such systems is deemed efficient use. As referred to in this section, changes of points of use for existing water right permits, certificates, or claims are not within the meaning of a development of new sources of supply.

             (b) "Service area" is the area designated as the wholesale and/or retail area in a water system plan or a coordinated water system plan pursuant to chapter 43.20 or 70.116 RCW respectively. When a public water system does not have a designated service area subject to the approval process of those chapters, the service area shall be the designated place of use contained in the water right permit or certificate, or contained in the claim filed pursuant to chapter 90.14 RCW.

             (3)(a) Public water systems with interties existing and in use as of January 1, 1991, or that have received written approval from the department of health prior to that date, shall file written notice of those interties with the department of health and the department of ecology. The notice may be incorporated into the public water system's five-year update of its water system plan, but shall be filed no later than June 30, 1996. The notice shall identify the location of the intertie; the dates of its first use; the purpose, capacity, and current use; the intertie agreement of the parties and the service areas assigned; and other information reasonably necessary to modify the public water system's water right ((permit)). Notwithstanding the provisions of RCW 90.03.380 and 90.44.100, for public water systems with interties existing and in use or with written approval as of January 1, 1991, the department of ecology, upon receipt of notice meeting the requirements of this subsection, shall, as soon as practicable, modify the place of use descriptions in the water right permits, certificates, or claims to reflect the actual use through such interties, provided that the place of use is within service area designations established in a water system plan approved pursuant to chapter 43.20 RCW, or a coordinated water system plan approved pursuant to chapter 70.116 RCW, and further provided that the water used is within the instantaneous and annual withdrawal rates specified in the water rights ((permit)) and that no outstanding complaints of impairment to existing water rights have been filed with the department of ecology prior to September 1, 1991. Where such complaints of impairment have been received, the department of ecology shall make all reasonable efforts to resolve them in a timely manner through agreement of the parties or through available administrative remedies.

             (b) An intertie meeting the requirements of this subsection (3) for modifying the place of use description in a water right permit, certificate, or claim may be used to its full design or built capacity within the most recently approved retail or wholesale or retail and wholesale service area, without further approval under this section and without regard to the capacity actually used before January 1, 1991. Any intertie meeting the requirements of this section, however, must be reviewed, analyzed, and approved by the department of health in collaboration with the department of ecology, and in accordance with coordinated water system plan requirements under chapter 70.116 RCW. In addition, any intertie meeting the requirements of this subsection must undergo environmental review in accordance with chapter 43.21C RCW.

             (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of RCW 90.03.380 and 90.44.100, exchange, acquisition, or delivery of water through interties approved by the department of health commencing use after January 1, 1991, shall be permitted when the intertie improves overall system reliability, enhances the manageability of the systems, provides opportunities for conjunctive use, or delays or avoids the need to develop new water sources, and otherwise meets the requirements of this section, provided that ((each)) a supplying public water system's water use shall not exceed the instantaneous or annual withdrawal rate specified in its water right authorization, shall not adversely affect existing water rights, and shall not be inconsistent with state-approved plans such as water system plans or other plans which include specific proposals for construction of interties. A receiving public water system's use may exceed its water right authorization if the receiving public water system's withdrawal does not exceed the instantaneous or annual withdrawal rate specified in the receiving public water system's water right authorization. Interties commencing use after January 1, 1991, ((shall not be inconsistent)) must be deemed consistent with regional water resource plans developed pursuant to chapter 90.54 RCW or chapter 90.82 RCW.

             (5) For public water systems subject to the approval process of chapter 43.20 RCW or chapter 70.116 RCW, proposals for interties commencing use after January 1, 1991, shall be incorporated into water system plans pursuant to chapter 43.20 RCW or coordinated water system plans pursuant to chapter 70.116 RCW and submitted to the department of health and the department of ecology for review and approval as provided for in subsections (5) through (9) of this section. The plan shall state how the proposed intertie will improve overall system reliability, enhance the manageability of the systems, provide opportunities for conjunctive use, or delay or avoid the need to develop new water sources.

             (6) The department of health shall be responsible for review and approval of proposals for new interties. In its review the department of health shall determine whether the intertie satisfies the criteria of subsection (4) of this section, with the exception of water rights considerations, which are the responsibility of the department of ecology, ((and)) shall determine whether the intertie is necessary to address emergent public health or safety concerns associated with public water supply, and shall determine whether long-term supply is addressed in the intertie agreement between the systems.

             (7) If the intertie is determined by the department of health to be necessary to address emergent public health or safety concerns associated with public water supply, the public water system shall amend its water system plan as required and shall file an application with the department of ecology to change its existing water right to reflect the proposed use of the water as described in the approved water system plan. The department of ecology shall process the application for change pursuant to RCW 90.03.380 or 90.44.100 as appropriate, except that, notwithstanding the requirements of those sections regarding notice and protest periods, applicants shall be required to publish notice one time, and the comment period shall be fifteen days from the date of publication of the notice. Within sixty days of receiving the application, the department of ecology shall issue findings and advise the department of health if existing water rights are determined to be adversely affected. If no determination is provided by the department of ecology within the sixty-day period, the department of health shall proceed as if existing rights are not adversely affected by the proposed intertie. The department of ecology may obtain an extension of the sixty-day period by submitting written notice to the department of health and to the applicant indicating a definite date by which its determination will be made. No additional extensions shall be granted, and in no event shall the total review period for the department of ecology exceed one hundred eighty days.

             (8) If the department of health determines the proposed intertie appears to meet the requirements of subsection (4) of this section but is not necessary to address emergent public health or safety concerns associated with public water supply, the department of health shall instruct the applicant to submit to the department of ecology an application for change to the underlying water right or claim as necessary to reflect the new place of use. The department of ecology shall consider the applications pursuant to the provisions of RCW 90.03.380 and 90.44.100 as appropriate. The department of ecology shall not deny or limit a change of place of use for an intertie on the grounds that the holder of a permit has not yet put all of the water authorized in the permit to beneficial use. If in its review of proposed interties and associated water rights the department of ecology determines that additional information is required to act on the application, the department may request applicants to provide information necessary for its decision, consistent with agency rules and written guidelines. Parties disagreeing with the decision of the department of ecology ((on)) to approve or deny the application for change in place of use may appeal the decision to the pollution control hearings board.

             (9) The department of health may approve plans containing intertie proposals prior to the department of ecology's decision on the water right application for change in place of use. However, notwithstanding such approval, construction work on the intertie shall not begin until the department of ecology issues the appropriate water right document to the applicant consistent with the approved plan.

             (10) An intertie shall not be used to deliver a primary or secondary supply of water to a receiving system on a temporary basis unless the terms of the intertie agreement specify the source of the water that will be used by the receiving system to replace the water delivered on the temporary basis and provide that replacement water will be available for delivery to or use by the receiving system before delivery by the supplying system under the agreement is terminated. However, if a primary or secondary supply of water is delivered to a receiving system on a temporary basis by means of an intertie on the effective date of this subsection and the agreement between the supplying system and receiving system does not contain such provision for such a replacement supply of water for the receiving system, the delivery of the water by the supplying system to the receiving system shall not be terminated until the agreement is modified to establish such provisions and such replacement water is available for delivery to or use by the receiving system.


             Sec. 23. RCW 90.03.330 and 1987 c 109 s 89 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) Upon a showing satisfactory to the department that any appropriation has been perfected in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, it shall be the duty of the department to issue to the applicant a certificate stating such facts in a form to be prescribed by him, and such certificate shall thereupon be recorded with the department. Any original water right certificate issued, as provided by this chapter, shall be recorded with the department and thereafter, at the expense of the party receiving the same, be by the department transmitted to the county auditor of the county or counties where the distributing system or any part thereof is located, and be recorded in the office of such county auditor, and thereafter be transmitted to the owner thereof.

             (2) If a public water system is providing water for municipal supply purposes under a certificated water right, the instantaneous and annual withdrawal rates specified in the certificate are deemed valid and perfected.

             (3) If a federal reclamation project is providing water for reclamation purposes under a certificated water right, the instantaneous and annual withdrawal rates specified in the certificate are deemed valid and perfected.

             (4) If an irrigation district is providing water for the purposes authorized by chapter 87.03 RCW under a certificated water right, the instantaneous and annual withdrawal rates specified in the certificate are deemed valid and perfected.

             (5) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, the public water system, federal reclamation project, or irrigation district must demonstrate to the department of ecology in accordance with water system plans and reviews pursuant to chapter 70.119A or 87.03 RCW, that the instantaneous and annual withdrawal rates will be necessary in order to accommodate the needs of its users during the most recent projection for a fifty-year period.


             Sec. 24. RCW 90.14.140 and 1987 c 125 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

             (1) For the purposes of RCW 90.14.130 through 90.14.180, "sufficient cause" shall be defined as the nonuse of all or a portion of the water by the owner of a water right for a period of five or more consecutive years where such nonuse occurs as a result of:

             (a) Drought, or other unavailability of water;

             (b) Active service in the armed forces of the United States during military crisis;

             (c) Nonvoluntary service in the armed forces of the United States;

             (d) The operation of legal proceedings;

             (e) Federal laws imposing land or water use restrictions either directly or through the voluntary enrollment of a landowner in a federal program implementing those laws, or acreage limitations, or production quotas;

             (f) An elapse of time occurring while a request or application is processed for transferring or changing a water right;

             (g) The implementation of practices or technologies or the installation or repair of facilities, including but not limited to water conveyance practices, technologies, or facilities, that are more efficient or more water use efficient than practices, technologies, or facilities previously used under the water right.

             (2) Notwithstanding any other provisions of RCW 90.14.130 through 90.14.180, there shall be no relinquishment of any water right:

             (a) If such right is claimed for power development purposes under chapter 90.16 RCW and annual license fees are paid in accordance with chapter 90.16 RCW, or

             (b) If such right is used for a standby or reserve water supply to be used in time of drought or other low flow period so long as withdrawal or diversion facilities are maintained in good operating condition for the use of such reserve or standby water supply, or

             (c) If such right is claimed for a determined future development to take place ((either)) at any time within fifteen years of either July 1, 1967, or the most recent beneficial use of the water right, whichever date is later, or

             (d) If such right is claimed for municipal water supply purposes under chapter 90.03 RCW, or

             (e) If such waters are not subject to appropriation under the applicable provisions of RCW 90.40.030 as now or hereafter amended.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 25. Captions used in this act are not part of the law.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 26. Sections 4 through 12, and 15 of this act are each added to chapter 90.82 RCW.


             NEW SECTION. Sec. 27. This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately."


             On page 1, line 1 of the title, after "management;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 90.82.005, 90.82.010, 90.82.020, 90.82.040, 90.03.345, 90.03.380, 90.44.100, 90.03.290, 90.44.445, 90.03.383, 90.03.330, and 90.14.140; adding a new section to chapter 34.05 RCW; adding new sections to chapter 90.82 RCW; adding new sections to chapter 90.03 RCW; creating a new section; and declaring an emergency."


             Representative Schoesler spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment to the amendment.


             Representatives Chandler and Linville spoke against the adoption of the amendment to the amendment.


             The amendment to the amendment was not adopted.


             The striking amendment (985) as amended was adopted. The bill was ordered engrossed.


             There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


             The Speaker assumed the chair.


             Representatives Chandler, Linville, Regala, Mastin, Buck, Anderson, Dunshee, Chandler (again) and Cooper spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


             Representative Schoesler spoke against passage of the bill.


             The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2514.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2514 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 86, Nays - 10, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Anderson, Appelwick, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Butler, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Clements, Cody, Cooke, Cooper, Costa, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eickmeyer, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Kastama, Kenney, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Linville, Lisk, Mason, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Morris, Mulliken, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Parlette, Pennington, Poulsen, Quall, Radcliff, Reams, Regala, Robertson, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Smith, Sommers, D., Sommers, H., Sterk, Sullivan, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Tokuda, Van Luven, Veloria, Wensman, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 86.

             Voting nay: Representatives Chopp, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Fisher, Keiser, Lantz, Romero, Schoesler and Wolfe - 10.

             Excused: Representatives Skinner and Zellinsky - 2.


             Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2514, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


             SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2300, by House Committee on Education (originally sponsored by Representatives Johnson, Keiser, Huff, Talcott, Hickel, Carrell, Linville, Lisk, Veloria, Skinner, Cairnes, Mason, Lambert, Mulliken, Backlund, Mitchell, Wolfe, Constantine, Kastama, Kenney, Gardner, Benson, Ogden, Butler, Carlson, Kessler, Costa, Anderson, Conway, Lantz and McDonald)


             Relating to educational pathways


POINT OF ORDER


             Representative Johnson requested a Scope and Object ruling on amendment number 825 to Substitute House Bill No. 2300. (For amendment, see Journal 29th Day, February 9, 1998.)


SPEAKER'S RULING


             Representative Johnson, the Speaker is prepared to rule on your Point of Order which challenges the Scope and Object on amendment 825 to Substitute House Bill No. 2300.


             The Title of Substitute House Bill No. 2300 is "AN ACT Relating to educational pathways" the bill amends RCW 28A.630.885 which is part of the Commission on Student Learning law.


             Amendment 825 would add a 1.5 million dollar appropriation to the bill to fund the school to work program not found in the RCW sections dealing with the Commission on Student Learning.


             The amendment does not in any manner provide funding for the purposes of implementing Substitute House Bill No. 2300 and in fact specifically would dedicate all of its revenues to a program that is not part of Substitute House Bill No. 2300.


             The Speaker finds that amendment 825 is beyond the Scope and Object of Substitute House Bill No. 2300.


             Representative Johnson, your Point of Order is well taken.


             With the consent of the House, amendment number 984 to Substitute House Bill No. 2300 was withdrawn.


             Representative Keiser moved the adoption of amendment (899):


             On page 5, line 31, after "work-based learning," insert "apprenticeships,"


             On page 10, line 1, after "work-based learning," insert "apprenticeships,"


             Representatives Keiser, Cole and Conway spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


             Representative Johnson spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


             Representative Hatfield demanded an electronic roll call vote and the demand was sustained.


             The Speaker stated the question before the House to be adoption of amendment 899 to Substitute House Bill No. 2300.


ROLLCALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of amendment 899 to Substitute House Bill No. 2300, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 44, Nays - 52, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

             Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Butler, Cairnes, Chopp, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooper, Costa, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hatfield, Kastama, Keiser, Kenney, Kessler, Lantz, Linville, Mason, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Poulsen, Quall, Regala, Romero, Schmidt, K., Scott, Smith, Sommers, H., Sullivan, Tokuda, Veloria, Wolfe and Wood - 44.

             Voting nay: Representatives Alexander, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Clements, Cooke, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dunn, Dyer, Hankins, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Koster, Lambert, Lisk, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Mulliken, Parlette, Pennington, Radcliff, Reams, Robertson, Schmidt, D., Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Sommers, D., Sterk, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Van Luven, Wensman and Mr. Speaker - 52.

             Excused: Representatives Skinner and Zellinsky - 2.


             Representative Johnson moved the adoption of amendment (924):


             On page 5, line 35, after "all" strike "pathways adopted in the school provide students with" and insert "participating students will continue to have"


             On page 9, line 23, after "all" strike "pathways adopted in the school provide students with" and insert "participating students will continue to have"


             Representatives Johnson and Keiser spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


             The amendment was adopted. The bill was ordered engrossed.


             There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


             Representatives Johnson, Keiser, Cole, Clements and Conway spoke in favor of the passage of the bill.


             The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2300.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2300 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 95, Nays - 0, Absent - 1, Excused - 2.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Anderson, Appelwick, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Butler, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Chopp, Clements, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooke, Cooper, Costa, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kenney, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Lantz, Linville, Lisk, Mason, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Morris, Mulliken, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Parlette, Pennington, Poulsen, Quall, Radcliff, Reams, Regala, Robertson, Romero, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Smith, Sommers, D., Sommers, H., Sterk, Sullivan, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Tokuda, Van Luven, Veloria, Wensman, Wolfe and Wood - 95.

             Absent: Representative Mr. Speaker - 1.

             Excused: Representatives Skinner and Zellinsky - 2.


             Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2300, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION


             Representative Robertson, having voted on the prevailing side, moved that the rules be suspended, and that the House immediately reconsider the vote on Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2300. The motion was carried.


RECONSIDERATION


             The Speaker stated the question before the House to be final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2300 on reconsideration.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2300 on reconsideration and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Anderson, Appelwick, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Butler, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Chopp, Clements, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooke, Cooper, Costa, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kenney, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Lantz, Linville, Lisk, Mason, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Morris, Mulliken, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Parlette, Pennington, Poulsen, Quall, Radcliff, Reams, Regala, Robertson, Romero, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Smith, Sommers, D., Sommers, H., Sterk, Sullivan, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Tokuda, Van Luven, Veloria, Wensman, Wolfe, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 96.

             Excused: Representatives Skinner and Zellinsky - 2.


             Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 2300, on reconsideration, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


             The Speaker called upon Representative Pennington to preside.


             HOUSE BILL NO. 2922, by Representatives Carlson, H. Sommers, Alexander and Huff; by request of Department of Retirement Systems


             Clarifying the trusteeship role of the state investment board and the employee retirement benefits board.


             The bill was read the second time. There being no objection, Substitute House Bill No. 2922 was substituted for House Bill No. 2922 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.


             Substitute House Bill No. 2922 was read the second time.


             There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


             Representatives Carlson and H. Sommers spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 2922.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 2922 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Anderson, Appelwick, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Butler, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Chopp, Clements, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooke, Cooper, Costa, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunn, Dunshee, Dyer, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kenney, Kessler, Koster, Lambert, Lantz, Linville, Lisk, Mason, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Morris, Mulliken, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Parlette, Pennington, Poulsen, Quall, Radcliff, Reams, Regala, Robertson, Romero, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Scott, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Smith, Sommers, D., Sommers, H., Sterk, Sullivan, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Tokuda, Van Luven, Veloria, Wensman, Wolfe, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 96.

             Excused: Representatives Skinner and Zellinsky - 2.


             Substitute House Bill No. 2922, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


             HOUSE BILL NO. 1804, by Representatives Huff, Scott, Dyer, Sheldon, Sherstad, Alexander, Skinner, Clements, Zellinsky, Carrell, Lisk and McMorris


             Relating to civil actions.


             The bill was read the second time.


             There being no objection, the House deferred consideration of House Bill No. 1804 and the bill held its place on second reading.


             HOUSE BILL NO. 2308, by Representatives Mulliken, Johnson, McCune, Backlund, Carrell, Boldt, Sheahan, Smith and Talcott

 

Requiring parental consent before a school conducts certain tests, questionnaires, surveys, analyses, or evaluations.


             The bill was read the second time. There being no objection, Substitute House Bill No. 2308 was substituted for House Bill No. 2308 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.


             Substitute House Bill No. 2308 was read the second time.


             There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


             Representatives Mulliken, McCune, McDonald, Clement and Smith spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


             Representatives Cole, Keiser, Quall, Mason and Wood spoke against passage of the bill.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 2308.


ROLL CALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 2308 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 55, Nays - 42, Absent - 0, Excused - 1.

             Voting yea: Representatives Alexander, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Cairnes, Carrell, Chandler, Clements, Cooke, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dunn, Dyer, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Koster, Lambert, Lisk, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Mulliken, O'Brien, Parlette, Pennington, Radcliff, Reams, Robertson, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Skinner, Smith, Sommers, D., Sterk, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Van Luven, Wensman and Mr. Speaker - 55.

             Voting nay: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Butler, Carlson, Chopp, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooper, Costa, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Kastama, Keiser, Kenney, Kessler, Lantz, Linville, Mason, Morris, Murray, Ogden, Poulsen, Quall, Regala, Romero, Scott, Sommers, H., Sullivan, Tokuda, Veloria, Wolfe and Wood - 42.

             Excused: Representative Zellinsky - 1.


             Substitute House Bill No. 2308, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.


STATEMENT FOR THE JOURNAL


             I intended to vote NAY on Substitute House Bill No. 2308.

JIM MCCUNE, 33rd District


             There being no objection, the House reverted to the fourth order of business.


INTRODUCTIONS AND FIRST READING

 

HB 3125           by Representatives Cooper, Costa, Conway, O'Brien, Constantine, Ogden, Poulsen, Hatfield, Dickerson, Quall, Kessler, Butler, Fisher, Cole, Doumit, Mason, Keiser, Gombosky, Gardner, Wood, Grant, Romero, Chopp, Tokuda, Appelwick, Murray, Morris and Kenney

 

AN ACT Relating to property tax levies for emergency medical care and services; amending RCW 84.52.069; and creating a new section.

 

Referred to Committee on Finance.

 

HB 3126           by Representatives Wolfe, Cody, Romero, Costa, Dickerson, Gardner, Keiser, Conway, Anderson, Butler, Veloria, Kastama, Ballasiotes, Cole, Murray, Fisher, Tokuda, Constantine, Ogden, O'Brien, Radcliff, Mitchell, Hankins, K. Schmidt, Chopp, Morris, H. Sommers, Kessler and Kenney

 

AN ACT Relating to contraceptive health care benefits; adding a new section to chapter 48.43 RCW; and creating a new section.

 

Referred to Committee on Health Care.

 

HB 3127           by Representatives Cole, Linville, Keiser, Poulsen, Cooper, Gombosky, Dickerson, Fisher, Constantine, Ogden, O'Brien, Gardner, Veloria, Tokuda, Kastama, Wood, Eickmeyer, Dunshee, Murray, Kenney, Wolfe, Conway, Chopp and Kessler

 

AN ACT Relating to class size reduction; and adding a new section to chapter 28A.150 RCW.

 

Referred to Committee on Appropriations.

 

HB 3128           by Representatives Dyer and Murray

 

AN ACT Relating to health insurance coverage for persons with human immunodeficiency virus; amending RCW 48.41.100; and adding a new section to chapter 70.24 RCW.

 

Referred to Committee on Health Care.

 

HJM 4040         by Representatives Ogden, Romero and Cole

 

Regarding redirection of money from the military budget.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Administration.

 

HCR 4432         by Representatives Mulliken, Gardner, Mielke, Kessler, Honeyford, DeBolt, Buck, Parlette, Linville, McMorris, Sehlin, Quall, Pennington, Boldt, Schoesler, Johnson, Sump, Sheahan, Clements, Chandler, Doumit, Hatfield, Lisk, Anderson, Morris, Mastin, Dunn, Alexander, Grant, Delvin, Hankins, Eickmeyer, Skinner and Conway

 

Urging the legislature to select a Joint Committee on Rural Land Use and Economic Development.

 

Referred to Committee on House Government Reform & Land Use.

 

HCR 4433         by Representatives Linville, Buck, Regala, Mastin, Conway, Morris and Kessler

 

Resolving to establish a joint select committee on salmon restoration.

 

Referred to Committee on Natural Resources.

 

E2SSB 5424     by Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators West, Wojahn, Winsley, Hale, Franklin, Jacobsen and Rasmussen)

 

Providing tax credits for businesses in distressed communities that provide selected international services.

 

Referred to Committee on Trade & Economic Development.

 

SSB 5431          by Senate Committee on Energy & Utilities (originally sponsored by Senators Finkbeiner, Brown, Rossi, Strannigan and Long)

 

Extending the prohibition on filing for a tariff on mandatory measured telecommunications service.

 

Referred to Committee on Energy & Utilities.

 

SB 6169            by Senators Winsley and Prentice

 

Regulating third-party appraisals.

 

Referred to Committee on Financial Institutions & Insurance.

 

2SSB 6214        by Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Long, Hargrove, McDonald, Deccio, Franklin, Stevens, Strannigan, Wood, Schow, Swecker, Hale, Sellar, Thibaudeau, Haugen, Winsley and Oke)

 

Revising provisions relating to commitment of mentally ill persons.

 

Referred to Committee on Criminal Justice & Corrections.

 

ESSB 6216       by Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections (originally sponsored by Senators Horn and Patterson; by request of Department of Social and Health Services)

 

Allowing the department of social and health services to recover revenue from vendors that have been overpaid.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Administration.

 

ESB 6257         by Senators Strannigan, Roach, Goings, Anderson, Long, Oke, Swecker, Benton, Wood, Stevens, Rasmussen and Patterson

 

Lowering statutory levels for legal alcohol intoxication.

 

Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.

 

SSB 6425          by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators McCaslin, Haugen and Fraser)

 

Clarifying legal authority of an agency head.

 

Referred to Committee on House Government Reform & Land Use.

 

SB 6441            by Senators Oke, Prince, Haugen and Winsley; by request of Department of Transportation

 

Clarifying procedures for environmental protection change orders in public projects.

 

Referred to Committee on Capital Budget.

 

SB 6449            by Senators West, Anderson, Kohl, T. Sheldon, Jacobsen, Goings and Winsley; by request of Governor Locke

 

Specifying a business and occupation tax rate for income in the nature of royalties for the use of intangible rights.

 

Referred to Committee on Finance.

 

ESSB 6475       by Senate Committee on Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Roach, Fairley, Patterson, Kline, Haugen, McAuliffe, Goings, Kohl, Rasmussen and Oke; by request of Governor Locke)

 

Revising provisions relating to driving while under the influence.

 

Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.

 

SB 6483            by Senator West

 

Authorizing the transfer of enforcement of cigarette and tobacco taxes to the liquor control board.

 

Referred to Committee on Commerce & Labor.

 

ESSB 6502       by Senate Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Senators Horn, Haugen, Benton, Goings and Wood)

 

Deleting reference to obsolete transportation accounts.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation Policy & Budget.

 

SB 6503            by Senators Horn, Haugen, Benton, Goings, Wood and Winsley

 

Regulating unanticipated receipts in the transportation budget.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation Policy & Budget.

 

SB 6504            by Senators Horn, Haugen, Benton, Goings, Wood and Winsley

 

Broadening distribution of technology plans.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation Policy & Budget.

 

SSB 6507          by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Wood, Haugen, Oke, Heavey, Swecker, Prentice, Schow, Wojahn, Long, Loveland, Hale, Kline, West, Patterson, Snyder, Goings, Jacobsen, Spanel, Fairley, Fraser, McAuliffe, Brown and Kohl)

 

Eliminating the expiration of the state cosmetology, barbering, esthetics, and manicuring advisory board.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Administration.

 

SSB 6518          by Senate Committee on Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Roach, Benton, Long, Oke, Zarelli, Rossi, Sellar, Snyder, Johnson, Horn, McDonald, Hale, Strannigan, McCaslin, Prentice, Schow, Fraser, Deccio, Swecker, Morton, Goings, Bauer, Rasmussen and Haugen)

 

Increasing the degree of rape when the perpetrator incapacitates the victim.

 

Referred to Committee on Criminal Justice & Corrections.

 

SSB 6534          by Senate Committee on Commerce & Labor (originally sponsored by Senators Loveland and Prince)

 

Defining areas of distress for purposes of economic assistance.

 

Referred to Committee on Trade & Economic Development.

 

SSB 6535          by Senate Committee on Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Horn, Patterson, Haugen, Hale and Oke; by request of Washington State Patrol)

 

Providing for electronic transfer of criminal justice information.

 

Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.

 

ESB 6537         by Senators Schow, Heavey, Winsley and T. Sheldon; by request of Liquor Control Board

 

Allowing the liquor control board to receive grants and other funds or donations to implement programs about alcohol and tobacco.

 

Referred to Committee on Commerce & Labor.

 

SB 6539            by Senators Schow and Heavey; by request of Liquor Control Board

 

Making technical changes regarding designations for liquor licenses.

 

Referred to Committee on Commerce & Labor.

 

SSB 6545          by Senate Committee on Health & Long-Term Care (originally sponsored by Senators Wood, Wojahn, Rasmussen, Benton, Fairley, Strannigan and Hale)

 

Providing full funding for the impaired physician program.

 

Referred to Committee on Health Care.

 

SB 6552            by Senators Strannigan and Bauer; by request of Department of Revenue

 

Concerning the ad valorem taxation of vessels or ferries.

 

Referred to Committee on Finance.

 

SSB 6565          by Senate Committee on Financial Institutions, Insurance & Housing (originally sponsored by Senators Hale, Prentice, Winsley, Franklin, Long, Roach, Haugen, Stevens, Spanel, Wood, Rasmussen, T. Sheldon, Loveland, Benton, Johnson, Thibaudeau, McDonald, B. Sheldon, Snyder, Anderson, Oke and Goings)

 

Regulating insurance payments of insureds who are victims of domestic abuse.

 

Referred to Committee on Financial Institutions & Insurance.

 

SSB 6574          by Senate Committee on Education (originally sponsored by Senators Johnson, Stevens, Wood, Winsley, Deccio, Schow, Oke, McCaslin, Rossi, Hochstatter, Swecker, Sellar, Morton, McDonald and Roach)

 

Authorizing learning materials to be loaned to private school students.

 

Referred to Committee on Education.

 

SSB 6575          by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Hale, T. Sheldon, McCaslin, Snyder, Horn, McDonald, Sellar, Newhouse, Schow, Strannigan, Benton, Zarelli, Stevens, Roach, Heavey and Oke)

 

Extending the powers of the joint administrative rules review committee.

 

Referred to Committee on House Government Reform & Land Use.

 

SB 6581            by Senators Roach and Fairley

 

Revising standards for determining child support obligations.

 

Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.

 

ESB 6582         by Senators Finkbeiner, Horn and Fraser; by request of Secretary of State

 

Refining electronic signature law.

 

Referred to Committee on Commerce & Labor.

 

SB 6585            by Senators Oke and Rossi

 

Authorizing distribution of nonhighway vehicle funds to nonprofit off-road vehicle organizations.

 

Referred to Committee on Natural Resources.

 

SSB 6598          by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators Horn, Haugen and T. Sheldon; by request of Office of Financial Management)

 

Regarding filing of state-funded personal service contacts.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Administration.

 

SSB 6602          by Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Anderson, Loveland, Bauer, Long, Goings, B. Sheldon, Strannigan, Benton, Rossi, Swecker, West, Schow and Oke)

 

Crediting carbonated beverage taxes against business and occupation taxes.

 

Referred to Committee on Finance.

 

SSB 6603          by Senate Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Senators Horn, Spanel, Oke and Wood)

 

Excepting certain vessels from registration.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation Policy & Budget.

 

SB 6604            by Senators Schow, Heavey and Horn

 

Allowing the department of labor and industries to exempt specified work on premanufactured electric power generation equipment from licensing requirements.

 

Referred to Committee on Commerce & Labor.

 

SSB 6605          by Senate Committee on Agriculture & Environment (originally sponsored by Senators Morton and Rasmussen)

 

Creating lien rights for owners of sires providing semen for artificial insemination.

 

Referred to Committee on Agriculture & Ecology.

 

SB 6631            by Senators McCaslin and Haugen

 

Specifying declaration of candidacy requirements for school director candidates in joint districts.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Administration.

 

SB 6650            by Senators Hochstatter and McAuliffe

 

Changing the scope of employment contract exceptions to school district officers' conflicts of interest.

 

Referred to Committee on Education.

 

SSB 6651          by Senate Committee on Health & Long-Term Care (originally sponsored by Senators Wood, Franklin and Winsley)

 

Regarding electronic transfer of prescription information.

 

Referred to Committee on Health Care.

 

SSB 6655          by Senate Committee on Higher Education (originally sponsored by Senators West and Brown)

 

Changing the Spokane intercollegiate research and technology institute.

 

Referred to Committee on Higher Education.

 

SSB 6667          by Senate Committee on Government Operations (originally sponsored by Senators B. Sheldon, Winsley, Snyder, T. Sheldon, Fairley, McAuliffe, Brown, Kohl, Rasmussen, Prentice, Patterson, Haugen, Loveland, Hargrove, Kline, Franklin, Wojahn, Jacobsen and Bauer)

 

Establishing the Washington gift of life medal.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Administration.

 

SSB 6669          by Senate Committee on Natural Resources & Parks (originally sponsored by Senators Rossi and T. Sheldon)

 

Allowing a holder of perpetual timber rights to sign a statement of intent not to convert the land to other uses for a period of time.

 

Referred to Committee on Natural Resources.

 

SB 6685            by Senators Haugen, Horn, Goings, Rasmussen, Prince, Prentice and Oke

 

Defining powers of commercial vehicle officers.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation Policy & Budget.

 

SB 6692            by Senators Jacobsen, Brown and Fraser

 

Requiring electric utilities to provide net metering systems to their customer-generators.

 

Referred to Committee on Energy & Utilities.

 

SB 6698            by Senator McCaslin

 

Revising timelines for the salary commission.

 

Referred to Committee on Government Administration.

 

SSB 6701          by Senate Committee on Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Fairley, Long, Kline and Thibaudeau)

 

Clarifying statute of limitations on actions for professional negligence against health care providers.

 

Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.

 

SB 6729            by Senators Prentice, Winsley, Finkbeiner, Fairley, Rasmussen and Kline

 

Financing senior housing.

 

Referred to Committee on Trade & Economic Development.

 

SB 6739            by Senators Hargrove and Oke

 

Requiring assessment of the impact on families before adoption of administrative rules and adoption of local government ordinances or resolutions.

 

Referred to Committee on House Government Reform & Land Use.

 

SSB 6751          by Senate Committee on Health & Long-Term Care (originally sponsored by Senators Deccio, Wojahn, Wood, Franklin, Benton, Thibaudeau, Oke and Winsley)

 

Ensuring a choice of service and residential options for citizens with developmental disabilities.

 

Referred to Committee on Children & Family Services.

 

SJM 8017         by Senators Oke, Rasmussen and Winsley

 

Naming the Admiral James S. Russell Bridge.

 

Referred to Committee on Transportation Policy & Budget.

 

SJM 8019         by Senators Winsley and Prentice

 

Requesting federal funds for housing finance.

 

Referred to Committee on Trade & Economic Development.


             There being no objection, the bills, memorials and resolutions listed on the day's introduction sheet under the fourth order of business were referred to the committees so designated.


             There being no objection, the House advanced to the eighth order of business.


MOTION


             Representative Chopp moved to suspend the rules and advance House Bill No. 3127 to second reading.


             Representative Chopp spoke in favor of the motion.


             Representative Lisk spoke against the motion.


             Representative Hatfield demanded an electronic roll call vote and the demand was sustained.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of Representative Chopp's motion that House Bill No. 3127 be advanced to second reading.


ROLLCALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of Representative Chopp's motion that House Bill No. 3127 be advanced to second reading, and the motion was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 42, Nays - 55, Absent - 0, Excused - 1.

             Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Butler, Chopp, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooper, Costa, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hankins, Hatfield, Kastama, Keiser, Kenney, Kessler, Lantz, Linville, Mason, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Poulsen, Quall, Regala, Romero, Scott, Sommers, H., Sullivan, Tokuda, Veloria, Wolfe and Wood - 42.

             Voting nay: Representatives Alexander, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Clements, Cooke, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dunn, Dyer, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Koster, Lambert, Lisk, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Mulliken, Parlette, Pennington, Radcliff, Reams, Robertson, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Skinner, Smith, Sommers, D., Sterk, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Van Luven, Wensman and Mr. Speaker - 55.

             Excused: Representative Zellinsky - 1.


MOTION


             Representative Chopp moved to suspend the rules and advance House Bill No. 3125 to second reading.


             Representative Chopp spoke in favor of the motion.


             Representative Lisk spoke against the motion.


             Representative Hatfield demanded an electronic roll call vote and the demand was sustained.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of Representative Chopp's motion that House Bill No. 3125 be advanced to second reading.


ROLLCALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of Representative Chopp's motion that House Bill No. 3125 be advanced to second reading, and the motion was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 41, Nays - 56, Absent - 0, Excused - 1.

             Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Butler, Chopp, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooper, Costa, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hatfield, Kastama, Keiser, Kenney, Kessler, Lantz, Linville, Mason, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Poulsen, Quall, Regala, Romero, Scott, Sommers, H., Sullivan, Tokuda, Veloria, Wolfe and Wood - 41.

             Voting nay: Representatives Alexander, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Clements, Cooke, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dunn, Dyer, Hankins, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Koster, Lambert, Lisk, Mastin, McCune, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Mulliken, Parlette, Pennington, Radcliff, Reams, Robertson, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Skinner, Smith, Sommers, D., Sterk, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Van Luven, Wensman and Mr. Speaker - 56.

             Excused: Representative Zellinsky - 1.


MOTION


             Representative Chopp moved to suspend the rules and advance House Bill No. 3126 to second reading.


             Representative Chopp spoke in favor of the motion.


             Representative Lisk spoke against the motion.


             Representative Hatfield demanded an electronic roll call vote and the demand was sustained.


             The Speaker (Representative Pennington presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of Representative Chopp's motion that House Bill No. 3126 be advanced to second reading.


ROLLCALL


             The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of Representative Chopp's motion that House Bill No. 3126 be advanced to second reading, and the motion was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 42, Nays - 55, Absent - 0, Excused - 1.

             Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appelwick, Butler, Chopp, Cody, Cole, Constantine, Conway, Cooper, Costa, Dickerson, Doumit, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Fisher, Gardner, Gombosky, Grant, Hatfield, Kastama, Keiser, Kenney, Kessler, Lantz, Linville, Mason, McCune, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ogden, Poulsen, Quall, Regala, Romero, Scott, Sommers, H., Sullivan, Tokuda, Veloria, Wolfe and Wood - 42.

             Voting nay: Representatives Alexander, Backlund, Ballasiotes, Benson, Boldt, Buck, Bush, Cairnes, Carlson, Carrell, Chandler, Clements, Cooke, Crouse, DeBolt, Delvin, Dunn, Dyer, Hankins, Hickel, Honeyford, Huff, Johnson, Koster, Lambert, Lisk, Mastin, McDonald, McMorris, Mielke, Mitchell, Mulliken, Parlette, Pennington, Radcliff, Reams, Robertson, Schmidt, D., Schmidt, K., Schoesler, Sehlin, Sheahan, Sherstad, Skinner, Smith, Sommers, D., Sterk, Sump, Talcott, Thomas, B., Thomas, L., Thompson, Van Luven, Wensman and Mr. Speaker - 55.

             Excused: Representative Zellinsky - 1.


             There being no objection, the bills listed on the day's floor calendar were sent to the Rules Committee.


             There being no objection, the House advanced to the eleventh order of business.


MOTION


             On motion of Representative Dyer, the House adjourned until 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, February 18, 1998.


TIMOTHY A. MARTIN, Chief Clerk                                                                           CLYDE BALLARD, Speaker