NOTICE: Formatting and page numbering in this document may be different

from that in the original published version.


THIRTY-SEVENTH DAY

------------

MORNING SESSION

------------


Senate Chamber, Olympia, Tuesday, February 15, 2000

      The Senate was called to order at 9:00 a.m. by President Pro Tempore Wojahn. The Secretary called the roll and announced to the President Pro Tempore that all Senators were present except Senators Finkbeiner, Haugen, McDonald, Patterson and Sellar. On motion of Senator Franklin, Senators Haugen and Patterson were excused. On motion of Senator Honeyford, Senator Sellar was excused.

      The Sergeant at Arms Color Guard, consisting of Pages Liz Jenkins and Edward Johnson, presented the Colors. Reverend Mike McIntosh, pastor of the Grace Church in Federal Way, and a guest of Senator Tracey Eide, offered the prayer.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Betti Sheldon, the reading of the Journal of the previous day was dispensed with and it was approved.


MESSAGES FROM THE HOUSE

February 11, 2000

MR. PRESIDENT:

      The House has passed:

      SECOND ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1059,

      ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1071,

      ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1572,

      ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2109,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2380,

      ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2439,

      ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2451,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2491,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2599,

      ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO. 2755,

      ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2929,

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 3045,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 4018, and the same are herewith transmitted.

                                                                                                                                                               CYNTHIA ZEHNDER, Co-Chief Clerk

TIMOTHY A. MARTIN, Co-Chief Clerk


February 11, 2000

MR. PRESIDENT:

      The House has passed:

      ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO. 1968,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2060,

      SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2359,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2377,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 2407,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 2452,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2454,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 2505,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2608,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2614,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 2733,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2803,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 2832,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2850,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 2853,

      HOUSE BILL NO. 2861,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2874,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 2899,

      SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 3016,

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 3099,

      HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 4026, and the same are herewith transmitted.

TIMOTHY A. MARTIN, Co-Chief Clerk

CYNTHIA ZEHNDER, Co-Chief Clerk


INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING

 

SB 6851             by Senators Rossi, T. Sheldon, McDonald, Finkbeiner, Johnson, Hale, Oke, Deccio and West

 

AN ACT Relating to creating the education and transportation funding act of 2000; adding a new section to chapter 41.06 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 43.88 RCW; creating a new section; repealing RCW 41.06.380 and 41.06.382; and providing for submission of this act to a vote of the people.

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.


INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS

 

2E2SHB 1059    by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives O'Brien, Ballasiotes, Kastama, Van Luven, McMorris, Cody, Carlson, Lantz, Parlette, Bush, Keiser, Skinner, Constantine, Anderson, Haigh, K. Schmidt, Regala, Fisher, Hurst, Delvin, Lovick, Ruderman, Radcliff, Kenney, Stensen, Kessler, Dunshee, Dickerson, D. Schmidt, Ogden, Rockefeller, Poulsen, Cooper, Quall, Scott, Lisk, Esser, McDonald, DeBolt, Conway, Mielke, Kagi, Morris and McIntire)

 

Creating crimes concerning the theft or destruction of mail or mail boxes.

 

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

 

E2SHB 1071      by House Committee on State Government (originally sponsored by Representatives Romero and D. Schmidt) (by request of Alternative Public Works Methods Oversight Committee)

 

Creating a limited public works process.

 

Referred to Committee on State and Local Government.

 

E2SHB 1572      by House Committee on Education (originally sponsored by Representatives Wensman, Tokuda, Santos, Quall, Veloria, Schoesler, Conway, Murray, Constantine, Ogden, Rockefeller, Kenney, O'Brien, D. Schmidt and Haigh)

 

Creating the Washington civil liberties public education program.

 

Referred to Committee on Education.

 

EHB 1968          by Representatives Van Luven, Cody, Alexander and Parlette

 

Limiting the scope of mental health record audits.

 

Referred to Committee on Health and Long-Term Care.

 

SHB 2060          by House Committee on Technology, Telecommunications and Energy (originally sponsored by Representatives DeBolt, Morris, Crouse, Ruderman and Poulsen)

 

Concerning the use of public rights of way in cities and towns.

 

Referred to Committee on Energy, Technology and Telecommunications.

 

E2SHB 2109      by House Committee on Finance (originally sponsored by Representatives Van Luven, Thomas, Dunshee, Pennington, Dunn, Cairnes, Veloria, Buck, G. Chandler and Haigh)

 

Authorizing tax exemptions for properties of Indian housing authorities designated for low-income housing program uses.

 

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

 

2SHB 2359        by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Parlette, Cody, Edmonds, Rockefeller, B. Chandler, Schoesler, Kenney, Conway, McDonald and Van Luven)

 

Concerning the nursing facility payment rate.

 

Referred to Committee on Health and Long-Term Care.

 

SHB 2377          by House Committee on Agriculture and Ecology (originally sponsored by Representatives G. Chandler, Linville, Pennington and Haigh) (by request of Department of Agriculture)

 

Regulating custom meat slaughter and preparation.

 

Referred to Committee on Agriculture and Rural Economic Development.

 

ESHB 2380        by House Committee on Health Care (originally sponsored by Representatives Cody, Parlette and Edwards) (by request of Governor Locke)

 

Clarifying the authority of the department of social and health services concerning boarding homes.

 

Referred to Committee on Health and Long-Term Care.

 

HB 2407            by Representatives Lantz, Esser and Haigh (by request of Board for Judicial Administration)

 

Authorizing judges pro tempore whenever a judge serves on a commission, board, or committee.

 

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

 

E2SHB 2439      by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Tokuda, Kagi, D. Sommers, Lovick, Kessler, Regala, Kenney, Cooper, Ogden, Eickmeyer, Murray, Schual-Berke, Stensen, Edmonds, Santos, Lantz, Wood and Benson)

 

Revising the family reconciliation process.

 

Referred to Committee on Human Services and Corrections.

 

E2SHB 2451      by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives McDonald, Hurst, Ruderman, Dunn, Mielke, Sullivan, Kastama, Bush, O'Brien, Schoesler, Wolfe, Stensen and Keiser)

 

Creating penalties for crimes involving anhydrous ammonia.

 

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

 

HB 2452            by Representatives Cody, Parlette, Edwards and Hurst (by request of Department of Health)

 

Making technical changes and corrections to department of health statutes.

 

Referred to Committee on Health and Long-Term Care.

 

SHB 2454          by House Committee on Health Care (originally sponsored by Representatives Edmonds, Parlette, Cody, Kenney, Radcliff, Kagi, Edwards, Lantz, Hatfield, Ogden, Conway, Veloria, Lovick, Kessler, O'Brien, Regala, McDonald, Carlson, Tokuda, Cooper, Van Luven, Ruderman, Murray, Schual-Berke, Scott, Stensen, Keiser, Santos, Pflug, Rockefeller, Wood and McIntire)

 

Providing a program to support family and other unpaid long-term caregivers.

 

Referred to Committee on Health and Long-Term Care.

 

SHB 2491          by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Schindler, Ballasiotes, Koster, Sullivan, Esser, Wood, Crouse, Cairnes, Rockefeller, Edmonds, Mulliken, Clements, Ruderman, McDonald and Dunn)

 

Providing a procedure to conduct DNA testing of evidence for persons sentenced to death or life imprisonment.

 

Referred to Committee on Human Services and Corrections.

 

HB 2505            by Representatives Cairnes, Veloria, O'Brien, Morris, Radcliff, Scott, Barlean, Esser, Kagi, Keiser, Fortunato, Schual-Berke, Edwards and Miloscia

 

Modifying the definition of "city" for the multiple-unit dwellings property tax exemption.

 

Referred to Committee on State and Local Government.

 

SHB 2599          by House Committee on Local Government (originally sponsored by Representatives Doumit, Mulliken, Scott, Fisher and Alexander)

 

Creating a training program for port district officials.

 

Referred to Committee on Labor and Workforce Development.

 

SHB 2608          by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Alexander, Carlson, H. Sommers, Doumit, Delvin, Lambert, Conway, Schoesler, Pflug, Talcott, Clements, Bush and Eickmeyer) (by request of Joint Committee on Pension Policy)

 

Establishing eligibility for the employee attendance incentive program.

 

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

 

SHB 2614          by House Committee on Agriculture and Ecology (originally sponsored by Representatives G. Chandler, Parlette, Linville, Sump, Schoesler and Ruderman)

 

Expanding sufficient cause for nonuse of water rights.

 

Referred to Committee on Environmental Quality and Water Resources.

 

HB 2733            by Representatives Wensman, Mastin, Skinner, Rockefeller and Santos

 

Allowing family member representation for traffic charges against non-English speaking persons.

 

Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

 

EHB 2755          by Representatives Gombosky, Crouse, Wood, Poulsen, Bush, Reardon, Mielke, Grant, McDonald, Delvin and Mastin

 

Clarifying the taxation of electrical energy sales.

 

Referred to Committee on Energy, Technology and Telecommunications.

 

SHB 2803          by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Lambert, Koster, Benson, Talcott, Cox, D. Schmidt, Esser, Lantz and Rockefeller)

 

Allowing private school students and students receiving home-based education to take the Washington assessments of student learning at district expense.

 

Referred to Committee on Education.

 

HB 2832            by Representatives McMorris, Carlson and Kenney

 

Changing eligibility for educational opportunity grants.

 

Referred to Committee on Higher Education.

 

SHB 2850          by House Committee on Finance (originally sponsored by Representatives Reardon, Schoesler, Scott, D. Schmidt, Tokuda, Skinner, Thomas, Clements, Dunshee, McIntire and Pennington)

 

Modifying the tax treatment of linen and uniform supply services.

 

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

 

HB 2853            by Representatives Wolfe, D. Schmidt, Romero, Cairnes, Haigh and Cody (by request of Department of Services for the Blind)

 

Conforming the advisory council for the blind with the federal rehabilitation act.

 

Referred to Committee on Human Services and Corrections.

 

HB 2861            by Representatives O'Brien, Cody, Miloscia, Parlette, Ballasiotes, Morris, Alexander, Anderson, Santos, Edmonds, Murray, Kastama, Schual-Berke, Scott, Thomas, Barlean, Quall, Dickerson, Mitchell, Delvin, Kenney, Edwards, Rockefeller and McIntire

 

Modifying the definition of health care information.

 

Referred to Committee on Human Services and Corrections.

 

SHB 2874          by House Committee on Higher Education (originally sponsored by Representatives Dunn, Skinner and Carlson)

 

Creating a legislative task force on community and technical college out-of-state tuition and residency.

 

Referred to Committee on Higher Education.

 

SHB 2899          by House Committee on Commerce and Labor (originally sponsored by Representatives Conway, Clements, Cody, Cooper and Keiser) (by request of Department of Social and Health Services)

 

Developing a workplace safety plan for state hospitals.


 

Referred to Committee on Human Services and Corrections.

 

E2SHB 2929      by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives McDonald and Linville)

 

Modifying requirements concerning on-site sewage disposal systems.

 

Referred to Committee on Environmental Quality and Water Resources.

 

2SHB 3016        by House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Parlette and Cody)

 

Creating a reimbursement system for the state's medical assistance programs in rural hospitals.

 

Referred to Committee on Health and Long-Term Care.

 

ESHB 3045        by House Committee on Commerce and Labor (originally sponsored by Representatives Wood and Clements)

 

Clarifying the requirements for a class 1 racing license.

 

Referred to Committee on Commerce, Trade, Housing and Financial Institutions.

 

SHB 3099          by House Committee on Capital Budget (originally sponsored by Representatives Dunshee, Barlean, Murray, Reardon, Koster and Lovick)

 

Allowing state and local governments to continue to lower their exposure to interest rate fluctuations with respect to financial obligations.

 

Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.

 

SHJM 4018        by House Committee on Local Government (originally sponsored by Representatives Mulliken, Doumit, Mielke, Scott, Ericksen, Fortunato, Hatfield, Schindler, Dunn, Thomas, D. Sommers and Esser)

 

Petitioning the Governor to direct state agencies adopting rules to examine and minimize impacts that would create new costs for local governments.

 

Referred to Committee on State and Local Government.

 

HJM 4026          by Representatives Doumit, Buck, Anderson, Sump, Eickmeyer, Hatfield and Schoesler

 

Requesting a review of migratory bird predation on salmonid stocks.

 

Referred to Committee on Natural Resources, Parks and Recreation.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Betti Sheldon, House Bill No. 2861 was referred to the Committee on Human Services and Corrections.

SECOND READING

CONFIRMATION OF GUBERNATORIAL APPOINTMENT


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Deccio, Gubernatorial Appointment No. 9152, Ann Miller, as a member of the Board of Trustees for Yakima Valley Community College District No. 16, was confirmed.


APPOINTMENT OF ANN MILLER


      The Secretary called the roll. The appointment was confirmed by the following vote: Yeas, 44; Nays, 0; Absent, 2; Excused, 3.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, Morton, Oke, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 44.

     Absent: Senators Finkbeiner and McDonald - 2.

     Excused: Senators Haugen, Patterson and Sellar - 3.


MOTION


      On motion of Senator Honeyford, Senators Finkbeiner and McDonald were excused.


 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6781, by Senators Rasmussen and Morton

 

Modifying provisions concerning the management of dairy nutrients.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6781 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6781 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6781 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6781.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6781 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 41; Nays, 4; Absent, 0; Excused, 4.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 41.

     Voting nay: Senators Eide, Fairley, Kline and Kohl-Welles - 4.

     Excused: Senators Finkbeiner, Haugen, McDonald and Sellar - 4.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6781, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS

 

      On motion of Senator Snyder, Senate Bill No. 6566 will be a special order of business at 4:55 p.m. this afternoon.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6260, by Senators Rasmussen, Heavey, Haugen, Goings, Oke and Gardner

 

Increasing penalties for manufacturing a controlled substance when children are present.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Heavey, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6260 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6260 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Heavey, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6260 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6260.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6260 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 45; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 4.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 45.

     Excused: Senators Finkbeiner, Haugen, McDonald and Sellar - 4.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6260, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6617, by Senators Prentice, Hale and Rasmussen (by request of Lieutenant Governor Owen)

 

Encouraging local economic development.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

 

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Hale, the following amendment by Senators Hale and Prentice was adopted:

       On page 2, after line 27, insert the following:

       "NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. The legislature finds that economic development, work force training, international trade, tourism development, housing assistance, assistance to local governments, and other programs and services provided by the department of community, trade, and economic development are vital to all regions of the state. The legislature further finds that program development and service delivery to the eastern region of the state could be significantly enhanced by a continuous, full-time physical staff presence in that region.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. For the purposes of this act:

       (1) "Department" means the department of community, trade, and economic development, or its successor agency or agencies.

       (2) "Director" means the director of the department.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. In order to more effectively respond to the needs of eastern Washington communities, the department shall, as soon as practicable, establish a field office and a full-time staff presence in eastern Washington. If practicable, the office shall be colocated with one or more existing state agencies in the Tri-Cities area to facilitate the urgent economic development needs of southeastern Washington. This office shall be staffed by the director in the most efficient manner that is likely to provide improved service to eastern Washington communities.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. Program activities and priorities for this office serving eastern Washington shall be determined by the director, in consultation with local government officials, business, labor, and educational advisors from the region.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately."

       Renumber the sections consecutively and correct any internal references accordingly.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Stentor Prentice, the following title amendment was adopted:

       On page 1, on line 1 of the title, after "capacity;", strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 43.330.070; creating new sections; and declaring an emergency."

      On motion of Senator Prentice, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6617 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6617.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6617 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Excused: Senators McDonald and Sellar - 2.

      ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 6617, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6618, by Senators Prentice, Shin, Hale and Rasmussen (by request of Lieutenant Governor Owen)

 

Establishing an industry cluster-based approach to economic development.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Prentice, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6618 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6618 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Prentice, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6618 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6618.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6618 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Absent: Senator Loveland - 1.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6618, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6579, by Senators Prentice, Haugen and Hale

 

Regulating cosmetology, barbering, manicuring, and esthetics.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Prentice, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6579 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6579.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6579 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 48.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6579, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6214, by Senators Deccio, Winsley and Franklin

 

Changing guardian duties under probate and trust law.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6214 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6214 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6214 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6214.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6214 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Absent: Senator Deccio - 1.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6214, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

      President Owen assumed the Chair.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Eide, Senator Snyder was excused.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6761, by Senator Hargrove (by request of Department of Corrections)

 

Authorizing agreements for the operation of correctional facilities and programs in any other state.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6761 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6761 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      Senator Kohl-Welles moved that the following amendment by Senators Kohl-Welles and Hargrove be adopted:

       On page 2, line 13, after "offender." insert "In determining whether the transfer will impose a hardship on the offender, the secretary shall consider: (a) The location of the offender's family and whether the offender has maintained contact with members of his or her family; (b) whether, if the offender has maintained

 

 

 

 

contact, the contact will be significantly disrupted by the transfer due to the family's inability to maintain the contact as a result of the transfer; and (c) whether the offender is enrolled in a vocational or educational program that cannot reasonably be resumed if the offender is returned to the state."

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senators Kohl-Welles and Hargrove on page 2, line 13, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 6761.

      The motion by Senator Kohl-Welles carried and the amendment was adopted.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6761 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6761.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6761 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Excused: Senators Sellar and Snyder - 2.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6761, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6263, by Senators Zarelli, Brown, Haugen, Swecker and Johnson

 

Concerning the legal parents or guardians of minor drivers.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Goings, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6263 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6263 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Goings, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6263 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6263.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6263 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Excused: Senators Sellar and Snyder - 2.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6263, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6431, by Senators Heavey, West, Prentice, Hale, Winsley, Horn, Gardner and Roach (by request of Horse Racing Commission)

 

Allowing for the dissemination of criminal history record information to the horse racing commission.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Prentice, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6431 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6431.

 

 

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6431 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 39; Nays, 8; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Haugen, Heavey, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Spanel, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley and Wojahn - 39.

     Voting nay: Senators Benton, Finkbeiner, Hargrove, Hochstatter, Roach, Stevens, Swecker and Zarelli - 8.

     Excused: Senators Sellar and Snyder - 2.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6431, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5848, by Senate Committee on Health and Long-Term Care (originally sponsored by Senators Hargrove, Hochstatter, Thibaudeau and Oke)

 

Providing insurance coverage under the basic health plan.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Thibaudeau, Third Substitute Senate Bill No. 5848 was substituted for Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 5848 and the third substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Thibaudeau, the rules were suspended, Third Substitute Senate Bill No. 5848 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Third Substitute Senate Bill No. 5848.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Third Substitute Senate Bill No. 5848 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Excused: Senators Sellar and Snyder - 2.

      THIRD SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5848, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6689, by Senators Haugen, Patterson, Winsley, Kline, Sheahan, Rasmussen and Kohl-Welles

 

Modifying the use of funds derived from the local real estate excise tax.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Patterson, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6689 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

 

DEMAND FOR THE PREVIOUS QUESTION

 

      Senators West, Morton and Deccio demanded the previous question and the demand was sustained.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be shall the main question be now put.

      The demand for the previous question carried.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6689.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6689 and the bill failed to passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 20; Nays, 27; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Brown, Costa, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Jacobsen, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, Patterson, Prentice, Sheldon, B., Shin, Spanel, Thibaudeau and Wojahn - 20.

     Voting nay: Senators Bauer, Benton, Deccio, Finkbeiner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Johnson, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, T., Stevens, Swecker, West, Winsley and Zarelli - 27.

     Excused: Senators Sellar and Snyder - 2.

       SENATE BILL NO. 6689, having failed to receive the constitutional majority, was declared lost.

 

 

NOTICE FOR RECONSIDERATION

 

      Having voted on the prevailing side, Senator Haugen served notice to reconsider the vote by which Senate Bill No. 6689 failed to pass the Senate.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6347, by Senators Patterson, Winsley and Gardner

 

Creating small works roster provisions to award public works contracts.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Patterson, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6347 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6347 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Patterson, the following amendments were considered simultaneously and were adopted:

       On page 6, after line 7, insert the following:

       "NEW SECTION. Sec. 105. A new section is added to chapter 39.04 RCW to read as follows:

       The department of community development, in cooperation with the municipal research and services center, shall prepare a small works roster manual and periodically notify the different types of local government authorized to use a small works roster process about this authority."

       Renumber the remaining section consecutively and correct any internal references accordingly.

       On page 26, after line 23, insert the following:

       "NEW SECTION. Sec. 303. (1) Section 104 of this act is null and void if Substitute Senate Bill No. 6396 or Substitute House Bill No. 2382 is enacted into law by June 30, 2000.

       (2) Section 105 of this act takes effect only if Substitute Senate Bill No. 6396 or Substitute House Bill No. 2382 is enacted into law by June 30, 2000."

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Patterson, the following title amendment was adopted:

       On page 1, line 4 of the title, after "adding" strike "a new section" and insert "new sections"

      On motion of Senator Patterson, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6347 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6347.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6347 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 48.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6347, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6369, by Senators Patterson, McCaslin, Haugen, Long, Costa, Fairley, Eide, Heavey, Wojahn, Prentice, Brown and Winsley

 

Ordering a study of law enforcement issues in counties with over 150,000 population.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Patterson, Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6369 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6369 and the second substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Patterson, the rules were suspended, Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6369 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6369.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6369 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 1; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Voting nay: Senator Roach - 1.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6369, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 5132, by Senators Kohl-Welles, Long, Hargrove, Brown, Patterson, McAuliffe and Costa

 

Improving child care services.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5132 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5132 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5132 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5132.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5132 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 48.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5132, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6555, by Senators Long, Hargrove, Patterson, Costa, Eide, Winsley and Kohl-Welles

 

Ordering a study of evaluations of children needing long-term care.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Long, the following striking amendment by Senators Long, Hargrove and Loveland was adopted:

       Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

       "Sec. 1. RCW 74.14A.050 and 1998 c 245 s 149 are each amended to read as follows:

       The secretary shall:

       (1)(a) Consult with relevant qualified professionals to develop a set of minimum guidelines to be used for identifying all children who are in a state-assisted support system, whether at-home or out-of-home, who are likely to need long-term care or assistance, because they face physical, emotional, medical, mental, or other long-term challenges;

       (b) The guidelines must, at a minimum, consider the following criteria for identifying children in need of long-term care or assistance:

       (i) Placement within the foster care system for two years or more;

       (ii) Multiple foster care placements;

       (iii) Repeated unsuccessful efforts to be placed with a permanent adoptive family;

       (iv) Chronic behavioral or educational problems;

       (v) Repetitive criminal acts or offenses;

       (vi) Failure to comply with court-ordered disciplinary actions and other imposed guidelines of behavior, including drug and alcohol rehabilitation; and

       (vii) Chronic physical, emotional, medical, mental, or other similar conditions necessitating long-term care or assistance;

       (2) Develop programs that are necessary for the long-term care of children and youth that are identified for the purposes of this section. Programs must: (a) Effectively address the educational, physical, emotional, mental, and medical needs of children and youth; and (b) incorporate an array of family support options, to individual needs and choices of the child and family. The programs must be ready for implementation by January 1, 1995;

       (3) Conduct an evaluation of all children currently within the foster care agency caseload to identify those children who meet the criteria set forth in this section. The evaluation shall be completed by January 1, 1994. All children entering the foster care system after January 1, 1994, must be evaluated for identification of long-term needs within thirty days of placement;

       (4) By region, report to the legislature on the following using aggregate data every six months beginning December 31, 2000:

       (a) The number of children evaluated during the first thirty days of placement as required in subsection (3) of this section;

       (b) The tool or tools used to evaluate children, including the content of the tool and the method by which the tool was validated;

       (c) The findings from the evaluation regarding the children's needs;

       (d) How the department used the results of the evaluation to provide services to the foster child to meet his or her needs; and

       (e) Whether and how the evaluation results assisted the department in providing appropriate services to the child, matching the child with an appropriate care provider early on in the child's placement and achieving the child's permanency plan in a timely fashion.

       (5) Each region of the department shall make the appropriate number of referrals to the foster care assessment program to ensure that the services offered by the program are used to the extent funded pursuant to the department's contract with the program. The department shall report to the legislature by November 30, 2000, on the number of referrals, by region, to the foster care assessment program. If the regions are not referring an adequate number of cases to the program, the department shall include in its report an explanation of what action it is or has taken to ensure that the referrals are adequate.

       (6) The department shall report to the legislature by December 15, 2000, on how it will use the foster care assessment program model to assess children as they enter out-of-home care.

       (7) The department is to accomplish the tasks listed in subsections (4) through (6) of this section within existing resources.

 

 

       (8) Study and develop a comprehensive plan for the evaluation and identification of all children and youth in need of long-term care or assistance, including, but not limited to, the mentally ill, developmentally disabled, medically fragile, seriously emotionally or behaviorally disabled, and physically impaired;

       (((5))) (9) Study and develop a plan for the children and youth in need of long-term care or assistance to ensure the coordination of services between the department's divisions and between other state agencies who are involved with the child or youth;

       (((6))) (10) Study and develop guidelines for transitional services, between long-term care programs, based on the person's age or mental, physical, emotional, or medical condition; and

       (((7))) (11) Study and develop a statutory proposal for the emancipation of minors."

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Long, the following title amendment was adopted:

       On page 1, line 2 of the title, after "needs;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "and amending RCW 74.14A.050."

      On motion of Senator Long, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6555 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6555.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6555 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Absent: Senator Deccio - 1.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 6555, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Eide, Senator Hargrove was excused.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6743, by Senators Costa, Hargrove, Long and Winsley

 

Adding a limitation on sealing of juvenile offender records.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Costa, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6743 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6743.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6743 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 46; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 46.

     Absent: Senator Kohl-Welles - 1.

     Excused: Senators Hargrove and Sellar - 2.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6743, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Eide, Senator Loveland was excused.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6373, by Senators Gardner, T. Sheldon, Prentice, Rasmussen, Winsley, Hale, Deccio and Shin

 

Clarifying promotional contests of chance.

 

 

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Prentice, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6373 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6373 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Prentice, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6373 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6373.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6373 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 43; Nays, 3; Absent, 0; Excused, 3.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 43.

     Voting nay: Senators Haugen, Long and Swecker - 3.

     Excused: Senators Hargrove, Loveland and Sellar - 3.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6373, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, the following resolution was adopted:

 

SENATE RESOLUTION 2000-8713

 

By Senator Rasmussen, Swecker, Franklin, Spanel, Honeyford, Sheldon, B., Goings, and Kohl-Welles

 

      WHEREAS, The 4-H Youth Development Program has helped young people in Washington develop useful “life skills” since it was established in 1914; and

      WHEREAS, The program centers on teaching young people to become productive members of society by fostering self-esteem, and communication and decision-making skills; and

      WHEREAS, 83,000 young people throughout Washington participated in 4-H Youth Development Programs in 1999; and

      WHEREAS, These programs help participants learn about a wide variety of subjects including science, family living and applied arts; and

      WHEREAS, More than 7,100 4-H youth raising livestock statewide are participating in an educational program learning how to produce high quality animals in an ethical manner;

      WHEREAS, In addition to working with traditional community clubs, the

programs reach youth through urban groups, special interest groups, nutrition programs, school enrichment, school-age care providers, camping, and interagency learning experiences;

      WHEREAS, The 4-H Youth Development Program promotes volunteer service by

enlisting more than 10,500 volunteers statewide, who donate an average two hundred hours of their time during the year; and

      WHEREAS, In 1998, the program achieved its goal of reaching a more diverse audience as twenty percent of participants came from ethnic minority groups; and

      WHEREAS, More than three hundred 4-H members from around the state are currently visiting the State Capitol as part of a statewide education program titled “4-H Know Your Government”;

      NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the members of the Washington State Senate recognize the 4-H Youth Development Program for its many contributions to the youth of Washington and the betterment of our communities; and

      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That a copy of this resolution be immediately transmitted by the Secretary of the Senate to Carol Beckman, the state program coordinator for the 4-H Youth Development Program.

 

      Senators Rasmussen and Morton spoke to Senate Resolution 2000-8713.

 

INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS

 

      The President welcomed and introduced the 4-H members who were seated in the gallery. Over three hundred 4-H members from around the state are visiting the state capitol learning about their state government.

 

MOTION

 

      At 11:28 a.m., on motion of Senator Betti Sheldon, the Senate was declared to be at ease.

 

      The Senate was called to order at 1:05 p.m. by President Owen.

      There being no objection, the President returned the Senate to the sixth order of business.

 

 

 

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 8022, by Senators Rasmussen, Swecker, Bauer, Roach, Goings, Benton, B. Sheldon, Snyder, Hale, Oke, Gardner, Johnson, Long, McAuliffe, Deccio, Winsley, Zarelli, Kohl-Welles, T. Sheldon and Haugen

 

Recognizing America's World War II veterans.

 

      The joint memorial was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Patterson, the rules were suspended, Senate Joint Memorial No. 8022 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the joint memorial was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Joint Memorial No. 8022.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Joint Memorial No. 8022 and the joint memorial passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 43; Nays, 0; Absent, 5; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 43.

     Absent: Senators Eide, Finkbeiner, Kline, McCaslin and Stevens - 5.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 8022, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Honeyford, Senator McCaslin was excused.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6429, by Senators Patterson and Horn (by request of Secretary of State Munro)

 

Changing statutes that effect the productivity board.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Patterson, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6429 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6429.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6429 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Excused: Senators McCaslin and Sellar - 2.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6429, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6255, by Senators Rasmussen, Prentice, Morton, Franklin, Heavey, Brown and Goings

 

Prescribing penalties for unlawful possession and storage of anhydrous ammonia.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6255 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6255 and the second substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, the rules were suspended, Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6255 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6255.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6255 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 48.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6255, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6513, by Senators Prentice, McCaslin, Kline, Gardner, Winsley, Kohl-Welles, Spanel and Costa (by request of Attorney General Gregoire)

 

Protecting privacy of personal information in commercial transactions.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Prentice, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6513 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6513 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Prentice, the following striking amendment by Senators Prentice, Hale, Winsley, Gardner and Shin was adopted:

       Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

       "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. INTENT. (1) The legislature finds that every entity has an affirmative and continuing obligation to respect the privacy of its consumers and to protect the security and confidentiality of consumers. The legislature finds that Washington's citizens have a right to privacy and a reasonable expectation that the personal information that they provide in commercial transactions with financial institutions and others who maintain and transfer information will be kept private and confidential. The legislature finds that there is no existing uniform law that creates an appropriate standard of conduct for disclosure of consumers' personal information and that Washington's citizens need additional statutory protection from fraud, deception, nuisance, invasion of privacy, and breach of confidentiality related to the disclosure of personal information. The legislature intends to ensure that entities and consumers work cooperatively to protect consumer information and enforce sanctions when violations occur.

       (2) The legislature finds that the disclosure of personal information has caused specific significant harms to Washington consumers, including the appearance of unauthorized charges or debits on consumers' accounts, misappropriation of sensitive information for the purpose of assuming a consumer's identity, the unwanted and unintended dissemination of personal and sensitive information, and the invasion of privacy.

       (3) The legislature finds that the dissemination of certain sensitive information causes a great risk of harm to the consumer, that it should be given a greater level of protection under the law, and that requiring consumer authorization to disseminate such sensitive information best balances the benefits and harms of disclosure.

       (4) The legislature finds that the flow of less sensitive personal information has resulted in a number of increased market efficiencies that are beneficial to consumers. These include more rapid credit transactions and check verifications, as well as an increased number of choices for products and services. The legislature finds that these benefits can be maintained by giving consumers the opportunity to choose whether their less sensitive information will be shared. The legislature finds that giving consumers this choice best balances the benefits and harms of disclosure of such information.

       (5) The legislature finds that the incidence of identity theft is rapidly growing, and that victims of identity theft need further assistance in obtaining the information necessary to the prosecution of their cases. The legislature finds that requiring additional information sharing by merchants with victims will result in greater protections for consumers and deter potential perpetrators.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. DEFINITIONS. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.

       (1) "Affiliate" means an entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control or common ownership with another entity. Companies that form alliances as a financial services group for purposes of marketing their services and are located at a common address, have personnel and payroll functions administered through a central office, jointly sponsor one combined employee savings and profit sharing plan, and have centralized data processing, mail service, communications, and procurement are considered under common control and affiliated with each other.

       (2) "Consumer" or "customer" means a natural person or his or her legal representative, who is a resident of the state of Washington and who purchases, leases, or otherwise contracts for products, goods, or services within the state of Washington or from an entity located in the state of Washington, that are primarily used for personal, family, or household purposes on or after the effective date of this act and who continues to be a resident of the state of Washington.

       (3) "Consumer-requested purpose" means for the purpose of establishing or maintaining a business relationship, completing a transaction, or providing a product, good, or service requested by the consumer.

       (4) "De minimus cost method" means any method, such as a toll-free telephone number, a post office box or address for accepting first-class mail, or any similar, convenient, low-cost method, which does not exceed the cost of a first-class postage stamp for the consumer. If other de minimus cost methods are offered, accepting e-mail or online messages from consumers shall be considered a de minimus cost method.

       (5) "Financial institution" means (a) a financial institution as defined in section 527(4) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, P.L. 106-102 and its implementing regulations; or (b) a bank holding company or financial holding company, as defined in sections 2(a) and 2(p) of the Bank Holding Company Act, as amended, or any subsidiary thereof as defined in section 2(d) of the Bank Holding Company Act, as amended.

       (6) "Functional business purpose" means use or disclosure of sensitive or personal information by an information custodian to another entity or person to perform services or functions on behalf of the information custodian as part of the information custodian's provision of its products, goods, or services to its customers;

       (7) "Information custodian" means all nonpublic commercial entities that maintain data containing personal information or sensitive information about consumers they know reside in Washington and that sell, share, or otherwise transfer the information to others, including affiliates or nonaffiliates, for purposes other than consumer-requested purposes or functional business purposes. An "information custodian" does not include a consumer reporting agency, as defined in the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681 et seq.), to the extent its activities are directly related to assembling or evaluating consumer credit information or other information on consumers for the purpose of furnishing consumer reports to third parties, and to the extent that the activities are regulated by the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681 et seq.). "Information custodian" does not include an "agent," "broker," or "solicitor" as defined in chapter 48.17 RCW, to the extent their activities include the sharing, selling, or transferring of personal or sensitive information between an insurer as defined in chapter 48.01 RCW, and its contractually bound agents, brokers, and solicitors, and their activities that are directly related to soliciting applications on behalf of an insurer, effectuating insurance contracts, or collecting premiums on insurances so applied for or effectuated.

       (8) "Marketer" means a nonpublic, commercial entity that maintains data containing personal information or sensitive information about consumers it knows reside in Washington and uses the information to engage in marketing.

       (9) "Marketing" or "marketing information" means a promotion, solicitation, or advertisement that specifically references the sale or lease of products, goods, or services made through written, telephonic, electronic, or other means, that is directed to a specific named consumer, but shall not include any promotion, solicitation, or advertisement (a) included with a billing or statement, (b) directed to the public, or (c) made to such consumer while present at the marketer's place of business or during any other contact with the marketer initiated by or at the request of the consumer.

       (10) "Personal information" means information that is provided by the consumer in a commercial context, and is identifiable to the individual consumer, that concerns the amount or condition of the consumer's assets, liabilities, financial transactions, purchasing history, buying preferences, business relationships, customer status, demographic information, name, address, telephone number, electronic mail address, or that reflects current or historical deposit or credit card account balances or purchase amounts.

       (11) "Sensitive information" means information maintained in a commercial context that is identifiable with an individual consumer or a specific account and may be held for the purpose of transaction initiation, account access or identity verification, and includes account numbers, access codes or passwords, social security numbers, tax identification numbers, driver's license or permit numbers, state identicard numbers issued by the department of licensing, and credit card numbers or expiration dates, and electronically captured signatures.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. RESTRICTION ON CONSUMER INFORMATION. Information custodians and marketers shall, in performing a transaction with a consumer, providing a service for a consumer, or establishing a business relationship with a consumer, require only that the consumer provide information reasonably necessary to perform the transaction, establish the relationship, administer or maintain the business relationship, collect or service a debt, protect against fraud or unauthorized transactions, or comply with applicable law. Any optional information must be specified as such, and the consumer must be given the option not to provide it.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. CONSUMER PRIVACY POLICIES. (1) An information custodian must have a consumer privacy policy that discloses to existing and prospective consumers the policies and practices of the information custodian regarding the use of consumer personal information and sensitive information acquired or possessed by the information custodian. Entities that maintain data containing personal information or sensitive information but do not sell, share, or otherwise transfer the data, are not required to have a privacy policy.

       (2) The consumer privacy policy, at a minimum, must summarize the information custodian's responsibilities under this chapter and describe the consumer's rights and remedies under it, and generally describe with whom the consumer's personal and sensitive information will be shared or to whom it will be sold or transferred.

       (3) The consumer privacy policy must also provide a reasonable means for consumers to access their personal and sensitive information that the information custodian shares, sells, or transfers for marketing purposes.

       (4) An information custodian must disclose its consumer privacy policy at least once no later than:

       (a) The effective date of this act to existing customers about whom the information custodian has names and addresses or other means of contact, or within a reasonable period of time after the information custodian obtains the consumers' names and addresses or other means of contact. For the purposes of this subsection, "existing customer" means a customer whose personal or sensitive information has been sold, shared, or transferred within the twelve-month period preceding the effective date of this act;

       (b) Thirty days after a prospective customer's initial request for the policy, following the effective date of this act; and

       (c) At the time when a new customer enters into a business relationship with the information custodian.

       (5) An information custodian must disclose its consumer privacy policy on an annual basis to existing customers after the initial disclosure described in subsection (4) of this section, and, when material changes are made to the policy, the information custodian must notify the consumer, clearly and conspicuously in writing, in plain language, of the material changes and describe the consumer's rights under sections 5(1) and 7 (1) and (2) of this act, including the consumer's right to withdraw any consent given by the consumer under section 7(2) of this act.

       (6) The disclosure of the consumer privacy policy must be clearly and conspicuously made in writing, in a document separate from or attached as the first item of other documents or pages that are provided to the consumer by the information custodian.

       (7) The consumer privacy policy must be clearly and conspicuously posted on the information custodian's website, if a website exists, and must be readily available for review at the information custodian's place of business.

       (8) Compliance by a financial institution with the timing of disclosures under section 503 of Public Law 106-102 (the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999) and its implementing regulations constitutes compliance with the disclosure deadline requirements of subsection (4) of this section and section 5(1)(a) of this act for existing customers.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. PERSONAL INFORMATION--CONSUMER CONTROL. (1) An information custodian may share, sell, or otherwise transfer personal information for purposes other than consumer-requested purposes or functional business purposes, only if it has clearly and conspicuously disclosed to the consumer the following information in plain language:

       (a) That the consumer has the right to choose not to have his or her personal information shared, sold, or otherwise transferred for purposes other than consumer-requested purposes or functional business purposes. The disclosure must be made at the time the consumer privacy policy is provided to the customer under section 4 of this act.

       (b) That the consumer may choose not to have his or her personal information shared, sold, or transferred for other than consumer-requested purposes or functional business purposes, by exercising his or her choice through a de minimus cost method the information custodian has established.

       (2) If, under this section, a consumer chooses not to have his or her personal information shared, sold, or otherwise transferred under subsection (1) of this section, the information custodian must stop sharing, selling, or otherwise transferring the consumer's personal information for purposes other than consumer-requested purposes or functional business purposes, within ninety days of receiving the consumer's notice. Once a consumer has chosen not to have his or her personal information shared, sold, or otherwise transferred, an information custodian may not share, sell, or otherwise transfer the information for purposes other than consumer-requested purposes or functional business purposes until the consumer notifies the entity that he or she has chosen to have his or her personal information shared, sold, or otherwise transferred under subsection (1) of this section.

       (3) This section does not apply to disclosure of personal information under the following circumstances. However, the recipient of the information is subject to section 8 of this act:

       (a) Disclosure to or at the direction or with the consent of the consumer upon his or her request and upon proper identification;

       (b) Disclosure required by federal, state, or local law or regulation, rules, and other applicable legal requirements;

       (c) Disclosure made in the course of a properly authorized civil, criminal, or regulatory examination or investigation or under a search warrant, court order, or subpoena, including an administrative subpoena or other legal process;

       (d) Disclosure to a third party or an affiliate for the purpose of collecting a debt or dishonored item;

       (e) Disclosure to protect the confidentiality or security of the information custodian's records;

       (f) Disclosure to protect against, investigate, or prevent actual or potential fraud, unauthorized transactions, claims, or other liability;

       (g) Disclosure as part of a risk control program required by or subject to examination by regulators;

       (h) Disclosure by or to a consumer reporting agency as specifically permitted under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681 et seq.);

       (i) Disclosure of consumer report information between affiliates as specifically permitted under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681 et seq.);

       (j) Disclosure for purposes of a proposed or actual securitization, secondary market sale (including sales of service rights), or similar transaction related to a consumer-requested purpose;

       (k) Disclosure to persons holding a legal or beneficial interest relating to the consumer;

       (l) Disclosure in order to provide information to insurance rate advisory organizations, guaranty funds or agencies, applicable rating agencies of the information custodian, persons assessing the information custodian's compliance with industry standards, and the information custodian's attorneys, accountants, and auditors;

       (m) Disclosure in connection with a proposed or actual sale, merger, transfer, or exchange of all or a portion of a business or operating unit of an information custodian if the disclosure of information concerns solely consumers of the business or unit;

       (n) Disclosure to a federal, state, or local agency as required by that agency to fulfill its legal obligations on behalf of a consumer;

       (o) Disclosure of health care information in compliance with state and federal law; or

       (p) Disclosure between licensees or franchisees and their licensors or franchisors, when (i) such licensees or franchisees market, sell, or lease products, goods, or services in a retail setting at a common physical address with the licensor or franchisor; (ii) have common data processing functions with the licensor or franchisor; and (iii) advertise, market, or sell products, goods, or services marked or otherwise directly identified with the franchisor's or licensor's name or distinctive brand.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. MARKETING-CONSUMER CONTROL. (1) A marketer may use personal or sensitive information for marketing purposes only if it has clearly and conspicuously disclosed in plain language to the consumer:

       (a) That the consumer has the right to choose not to receive marketing information. This disclosure must be made in all marketing information, in whatever medium the marketing information is sent or, if the marketer is an information custodian, in the privacy policy provided to the customer under section 4 of this act. If the marketer is not an information custodian, it may choose as an option to provide the disclosure in a privacy policy provided to the customer under section 4 of this act instead of disclosing it in all marketing information;

       (b) That the consumer may choose not to receive marketing information by exercising his or her choice through a de minimus cost method provided by the marketer. This disclosure must be made in all marketing information in whatever medium the marketing information is sent, or, if the marketer is an information custodian, in the privacy policy provided to the customer under section 4 of this act. The marketer shall maintain adequate and reasonable access for consumers to the de minimus cost method it has established. If the marketer is not an information custodian, it may choose as an option to provide the disclosure in a privacy policy provided to the customer under section 4 of this act instead of disclosing it in all marketing information.

       (2) If, under this section, a consumer chooses not to receive marketing information, the marketer must stop marketing to the consumer within ninety days of receiving the consumer's notice. Once a consumer has chosen not to receive marketing information, a marketer may not market to the consumer until the consumer notifies the marketer that he or she has chosen to receive marketing information.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. SENSITIVE INFORMATION--CONSUMER CONTROL. (1) An information custodian may not disclose sensitive information to a third party or affiliate for purposes other than consumer-requested purposes or functional business purposes unless the consumer has received written notification of the following:

       (a) The information to be disclosed;

       (b) The entity or entities authorized to receive the disclosure of information; and

       (c) A specific description of the purpose for which the disclosure of information will be made.

       (2) An information custodian may not disclose sensitive information to a third party or affiliate for purposes other than consumer-requested purposes or functional business purposes unless the consumer, upon notice as provided in this section and affirmative consent, authorizes the disclosure of the sensitive information sought to be disclosed, in a written statement dated and accepted by the consumer that is separate and distinct from any other document, and that contains a description of the information sought to be disclosed and the purpose for which the information will be disclosed.

       (3) This section does not apply to disclosure of sensitive information under the following circumstances. However, the recipient of the information is subject to section 8 of this act:

       (a) Disclosure to or at the direction or with the consent of the consumer upon his or her request and upon proper identification;

       (b) Disclosure required by federal, state, or local law or regulation, rules, and other applicable legal requirements;

       (c) Disclosure made in the course of a properly authorized civil, criminal, or regulatory examination or investigation or under a search warrant, court order, or subpoena, including an administrative subpoena or other legal process;

       (d) Disclosure to a third party or an affiliate for the purpose of collecting a debt or a dishonored item;

       (e) Disclosure to protect the confidentiality or security of the information custodian's records;

       (f) Disclosure to protect against, investigate, or prevent actual or potential fraud or unauthorized transactions, claims, or other liability;

       (g) Disclosure as part of a risk control program required by or subject to examination by regulators;

       (h) Disclosure by or to a consumer reporting agency as specifically permitted under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681 et seq.);

       (i) Disclosure of consumer report information between affiliates as specifically permitted under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681 et seq.);

       (j) Disclosure of sensitive information which is prohibited from disclosure by section 502(d) of Public Law 106-102 (the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999);

       (k) Disclosure for purposes of a proposed or actual securitization, secondary market sale (including sales service rights), or similar transactions related to a consumer-requested purpose;

       (l) Disclosure to persons holding a legal or beneficial interest relating to the consumer;

       (m) Disclosure in order to provide information to insurance rate advisory organizations, guaranty funds or agencies, applicable rating agencies of the information custodian, persons assessing the information custodian's compliance with industry standards, and the information custodian's attorneys, accountants, and auditors;

       (n) Disclosure in connection with a proposed or actual sale, merger, transfer, or exchange of all or a portion of a business or operating unit of an information custodian if the disclosure of information concerns solely consumers of the business or unit;

       (o) Disclosure of health care information in compliance with state and federal law;

       (p) Disclosure to a federal, state, or local agency as required by that agency to fulfill its legal obligations on behalf of a consumer; or

       (q) Disclosure between licensees or franchisees and their licensors or franchisors, when (i) such licensees or franchisees market, sell, or lease products, goods, or services in a retail setting at a common physical address with the licensor or franchisor; (ii) have common data processing functions with the licensor or franchisor; and (iii) advertise, market, or sell products, goods, or services marked or otherwise directly identified with the franchisor's or licensor's name or distinctive brand.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY OF INFORMATION. (1) Third parties or affiliates that obtain personal information or sensitive information from information custodians may not sell, share, or otherwise transfer the information for any reason other than the original purpose for which the information was sold, shared, or transferred to the third party or affiliate.

       (2) An information custodian, before sharing, selling, or otherwise transferring personal information or sensitive information, must obtain a written agreement from the third party or affiliate providing for the following:

       (a) To keep the information confidential;

       (b) To use the information only for the original purpose for which it has been shared, sold, or provided; and

       (c) To safeguard the information from loss, misuse, theft, unauthorized access, disclosure, defacement, or alteration.

       (3) Every information custodian must establish reasonable safeguards to ensure the confidentiality and safety of personal information and sensitive information and to protect them from loss, misuse, theft, unauthorized access, disclosure, defacement, or alteration.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. ACTIONS OR TRANSACTIONS BY COMPETITIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES. For purposes of this chapter, and the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW, actions or transactions by information custodians or marketers who, pursuant to RCW 80.36.320 are competitive telecommunications companies, or actions or transactions associated with competitive telecommunications services are not otherwise permitted, prohibited, or regulated by the utilities and transportation commission.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. VIOLATION AN UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE ACT. (1) Unfair and deceptive invasion of privacy rights is not reasonable in relation to the development and preservation of business. The legislature finds that the practices covered by this chapter are matters vitally affecting the public interest for the purpose of applying the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW. A violation of this chapter is an unfair or deceptive act in trade or commerce for the purpose of applying the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW.

       (2) A consumer may not bring an action for an alleged violation of this chapter, other than an alleged violation of section 7 or 8 of this act or a willful violation of section 3, 4, or 5 of this act, unless, within seven years before the alleged violation, he or she has notified the defendant of a violation of the section, in writing at an address specified in the defendant's privacy policy if the defendant is an information custodian or at an address provided by the defendant upon the consumer's request if the defendant is a marketer, and the defendant has again committed the violation more than ninety days after having received the notification.

       (3) Damages to a person who has been the victim of a violation of this chapter are five hundred dollars, or actual damages, whichever is greater. A court may increase the award of damages in an amount not more than three times the actual damages sustained, or one thousand five hundred dollars, whichever is greater, upon a demonstration that a violation of the chapter was willful.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. FEDERAL INVALIDITY--ANTITRUST LAWS. If the responsible federal chartering authority, under applicable federal law, or if a court of competent jurisdiction declares that any provision of this chapter is invalid with respect to any financial institution, the provision is also invalid, to the same extent, with respect to financial institutions chartered under the laws of the state of Washington and to host branches of out-of-state banks. The director of the department of financial institutions may, from time to time, publish provisions of state laws that have been found invalidated under federal law and procedures. This section does not impair in any manner the authority of the state attorney general to enforce antitrust laws applicable to financial institutions or their affiliates.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. A new section is added to chapter 9.35 RCW to read as follows:

       DEFINITIONS. As used in this chapter, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:

       (1) "Financial information" means, to the extent it is nonpublic, any of the following information identifiable to the individual that concerns the amount and conditions of an individual's assets, liabilities, or credit:

       (a) Account numbers and balances;

       (b) Transactional information concerning any account; and

       (c) Codes, passwords, social security numbers, tax identification numbers, driver's license or permit numbers, state identicard numbers issued by the department of licensing, and other information held for the purpose of account access or transaction initiation.

       (2) "Financial information repository" means any person engaged in the business of providing services to customers who have a credit, deposit, trust, stock, or other financial account or relationship with the person.

       (3) "Means of identification" means any information or item that is not describing finances or credit but is personal to or identifiable with any individual or other person, including any current or former name of the person, telephone number, and electronic address or identifier of the individual or any member of his or her family, including the ancestor of such person; any information relating to a change in name, address, telephone number, or electronic address or identifier of the individual or his or her family; any social security, driver's license, or tax identification number of the individual or any member of his or her family; and other information which could be used to identify the person, including unique biometric data.

       (4) "Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation, or association.

       (5) "Personal information" means information that is provided by the consumer in a commercial context, and is identifiable to the individual consumer, that concerns the amount or condition of the consumer's assets, liabilities, financial transactions, purchasing history, buying preferences, business relationships, customer status, demographic information, name, address, telephone number, or electronic mail address.

       (6) "Sensitive information" means information maintained in a commercial context that is identifiable with an individual consumer or a specific account and is held for the purpose of transaction initiation, account access or identity verification, or that reflects current or historical deposit or credit card account balances or purchase amounts, and includes account numbers, access codes or passwords, social security numbers, tax identification numbers, driver's license or permit numbers, state identicard numbers issued by the department of licensing, and credit card numbers or expiration dates.

       (7) "Victim" means a person whose means of identification, personal information, or sensitive information has been used or transferred without authorization with the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, an unlawful activity harming or intending to harm the person whose identity is used, or to commit a felony.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 13. A new section is added to chapter 9.35 RCW to read as follows:

       INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO VICTIM. (1) A person, financial information repository, corporation, trust, partnership, or unincorporated association possessing information relating to an actual or potential violation of this chapter, and who may have entered into a transaction, provided credit, products, goods, or services, accepted payment, or otherwise done business with a person who has used the victim's means of identification, must, upon request of the victim, provide copies of all information relevant to the potential or actual violation of this chapter.

       (2) Prior to providing the information required under subsection (1) of this section, the provider may require the victim to provide positive identification of the victim and a copy of a police report evidencing the victim's claim. The provider may also seek reasonable compensation for the actual cost of providing the information requested.

       (3) No person, financial information repository, corporation, trust, partnership, or unincorporated association may be held liable for an action voluntarily taken in good faith to provide information regarding potential or actual violations of this chapter to other financial information repositories, merchants, law enforcement authorities, or to the victim, for the purpose of identification and prosecution of violators of this chapter.

       Sec. 14. RCW 19.16.250 and 1983 c 107 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

       No licensee or employee of a licensee shall:

       (1) Directly or indirectly aid or abet any unlicensed person to engage in business as a collection agency in this state or receive compensation from such unlicensed person: PROVIDED, That nothing in this chapter shall prevent a licensee from accepting, as forwardee, claims for collection from a collection agency or attorney whose place of business is outside the state.

       (2) Collect or attempt to collect a claim by the use of any means contrary to the postal laws and regulations of the United States postal department.

       (3) Publish or post or cause to be published or posted, any list of debtors commonly known as "bad debt lists" or threaten to do so. For purposes of this chapter, a "bad debt list" means any list of natural persons alleged to fail to honor their lawful debts. However, nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit a licensee from communicating to its customers or clients by means of a coded list, the existence of a check dishonored because of insufficient funds, not sufficient funds or closed account by the financial institution servicing the debtor's checking account: PROVIDED, That the debtor's identity is not readily apparent: PROVIDED FURTHER, That the licensee complies with the requirements of subsection (9)(e) of this section.

       (4) Have in his possession or make use of any badge, use a uniform of any law enforcement agency or any simulation thereof, or make any statements which might be construed as indicating an official connection with any federal, state, county, or city law enforcement agency, or any other governmental agency, while engaged in collection agency business.

       (5) Perform any act or acts, either directly or indirectly, constituting the practice of law.

       (6) Advertise for sale or threaten to advertise for sale any claim as a means of endeavoring to enforce payment thereof or agreeing to do so for the purpose of soliciting claims, except where the licensee has acquired claims as an assignee for the benefit of creditors or where the licensee is acting under court order.

       (7) Use any name while engaged in the making of a demand for any claim other than the name set forth on his or its current license issued hereunder.

       (8) Give or send to any debtor or cause to be given or sent to any debtor, any notice, letter, message, or form which represents or implies that a claim exists unless it shall indicate in clear and legible type:

       (a) The name of the licensee and the city, street, and number at which he is licensed to do business;

       (b) The name of the original creditor to whom the debtor owed the claim if such name is known to the licensee or employee: PROVIDED, That upon written request of the debtor, the licensee shall make a reasonable effort to obtain the name of such person and provide this name to the debtor;

       (c) If the notice, letter, message, or form is the first notice to the debtor or if the licensee is attempting to collect a different amount than indicated in his or its first notice to the debtor, an itemization of the claim asserted must be made including:

       (i) Amount owing on the original obligation at the time it was received by the licensee for collection or by assignment;

       (ii) Interest or service charge, collection costs, or late payment charges, if any, added to the original obligation by the original creditor, customer or assignor before it was received by the licensee for collection, if such information is known by the licensee or employee: PROVIDED, That upon written request of the debtor, the licensee shall make a reasonable effort to obtain information on such items and provide this information to the debtor;

       (iii) Interest or service charge, if any, added by the licensee or customer or assignor after the obligation was received by the licensee for collection;

       (iv) Collection costs, if any, that the licensee is attempting to collect;

       (v) Attorneys' fees, if any, that the licensee is attempting to collect on his or its behalf or on the behalf of a customer or assignor;

       (vi) Any other charge or fee that the licensee is attempting to collect on his or its own behalf or on the behalf of a customer or assignor.

       (9) Communicate or threaten to communicate, the existence of a claim to a person other than one who might be reasonably expected to be liable on the claim in any manner other than through proper legal action, process, or proceedings except under the following conditions:

       (a) A licensee or employee of a licensee may inform a credit reporting bureau of the existence of a claim: PROVIDED, That if the licensee or employee of a licensee reports a claim to a credit reporting bureau, the licensee shall upon receipt of written notice from the debtor that any part of the claim is disputed, forward a copy of such written notice to the credit reporting bureau;

       (b) A licensee or employee in collecting or attempting to collect a claim may communicate the existence of a claim to a debtor's employer if the claim has been reduced to a judgment;

       (c) A licensee or employee in collecting or attempting to collect a claim that has not been reduced to judgment, may communicate the existence of a claim to a debtor's employer if:

       (i) The licensee or employee has notified or attempted to notify the debtor in writing at his last known address or place of employment concerning the claim and the debtor after a reasonable time has failed to pay the claim or has failed to agree to make payments on the claim in a manner acceptable to the licensee, and

       (ii) The debtor has not in writing to the licensee disputed any part of the claim: PROVIDED, That the licensee or employee may only communicate the existence of a claim which has not been reduced to judgment to the debtor's employer once unless the debtor's employer has agreed to additional communications.

       (d) A licensee may for the purpose of locating the debtor or locating assets of the debtor communicate the existence of a claim to any person who might reasonably be expected to have knowledge of the whereabouts of a debtor or the location of assets of the debtor if the claim is reduced to judgment, or if not reduced to judgment, when:

       (i) The licensee or employee has notified or attempted to notify the debtor in writing at his last known address or last known place of employment concerning the claim and the debtor after a reasonable time has failed to pay the claim or has failed to agree to make payments on the claim in a manner acceptable to the licensee, and

       (ii) The debtor has not in writing disputed any part of the claim.

       (e) A licensee may communicate the existence of a claim to its customers or clients if the claim is reduced to judgment, or if not reduced to judgment, when:

       (i) The licensee has notified or attempted to notify the debtor in writing at his last known address or last known place of employment concerning the claim and the debtor after a reasonable time has failed to pay the claim or has failed to agree to make payments on the claim in a manner acceptable to the licensee, and

       (ii) The debtor has not in writing disputed any part of the claim.

       (10) Threaten the debtor with impairment of his credit rating if a claim is not paid.

       (11) Communicate with the debtor after notification in writing from an attorney representing such debtor that all further communications relative to a claim should be addressed to the attorney: PROVIDED, That if a licensee requests in writing information from an attorney regarding such claim and the attorney does not respond within a reasonable time, the licensee may communicate directly with the debtor until he or it again receives notification in writing that an attorney is representing the debtor.

       (12) Communicate with a debtor or anyone else in such a manner as to harass, intimidate, threaten, or embarrass a debtor, including but not limited to communication at an unreasonable hour, with unreasonable frequency, by threats of force or violence, by threats of criminal prosecution, and by use of offensive language. A communication shall be presumed to have been made for the purposes of harassment if:

       (a) It is made with a debtor or spouse in any form, manner, or place, more than three times in a single week;

       (b) It is made with a debtor at his or her place of employment more than one time in a single week;

       (c) It is made with the debtor or spouse at his or her place of residence between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 7:30 a.m.

       (13) Communicate with the debtor through use of forms or instruments that simulate the form or appearance of judicial process, the form or appearance of government documents, or the simulation of a form or appearance of a telegraphic or emergency message.

       (14) Communicate with the debtor and represent or imply that the existing obligation of the debtor may be or has been increased by the addition of attorney fees, investigation fees, service fees, or any other fees or charges when in fact such fees or charges may not legally be added to the existing obligation of such debtor.

       (15) Threaten to take any action against the debtor which the licensee cannot legally take at the time the threat is made.

       (16) Send any telegram or make any telephone calls to a debtor or concerning a debt or for the purpose of demanding payment of a claim or seeking information about a debtor, for which the charges are payable by the addressee or by the person to whom the call is made.

       (17) In any manner convey the impression that the licensee is vouched for, bonded to or by, or is an instrumentality of the state of Washington or any agency or department thereof.

       (18) Collect or attempt to collect in addition to the principal amount of a claim any sum other than allowable interest, collection costs or handling fees expressly authorized by statute, and, in the case of suit, attorney's fees and taxable court costs.

       (19) Procure from a debtor or collect or attempt to collect on any written note, contract, stipulation, promise or acknowledgment under which a debtor may be required to pay any sum other than principal, allowable interest, and, in the case of suit, attorney's fees and taxable court costs.

       (20) Upon notification by a victim, as defined in section 12 of this act, that a police report has been filed regarding the victim's claim, and upon receipt of a copy of the report indicating that the victim's checkbook or other series of preprinted written instruments has been stolen, fail to accept one single writing from the victim that identifies the numbers of the checks, the bank, and account number, that disputes creditors' claims for the identified checks or written instruments and that includes a copy of the victim's driver's license or other document containing the victim's signature which was executed prior to the date of claim identified in the police report. If more than one collection agency is attempting collection on individual checks or written instruments that are part of the series, each collection agency may request a single writing from the victim that disputes creditors' claims for the entire checkbook or series. Once a single writing has been received, the collection agency must not, except in the context of a judicial or administrative proceeding, contact the victim orally within the one hundred eighty-day period following receipt of the writing to require additional proof, explanation, or evidence except in a court of law from the victim disputing creditors' claims regarding the enumerated checks or other written instruments in the same series or lot and must consider the single writing as a dispute to all creditors' claims arising from use of the enumerated checks or other series of instruments.

       Sec. 15. RCW 9.35.010 and 1999 c 368 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) No person may obtain or attempt to obtain, or cause to be disclosed or attempt to cause to be disclosed to any person, financial information from a financial information repository:

       (a) By knowingly making a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation to an officer, employee, or agent of a financial information repository with the intent to deceive the officer, employee, or agent into relying on that statement or representation for purposes of releasing the financial information;

       (b) By knowingly making a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation to a customer of a financial information repository with the intent to deceive the customer into releasing financial information or authorizing the release of such information;

       (c) By knowingly providing any document to an officer, employee, or agent of a financial information repository, knowing that the document is forged, counterfeit, lost, or stolen; was fraudulently obtained; or contains a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, if the document is provided with the intent to deceive the officer, employee, or agent to release the financial information.

       (2) No person may request another person to obtain financial information from a financial information repository and knows or should have known that the person will obtain or attempt to obtain the information from the financial institution repository in any manner described in subsection (1) of this section.

       (3) ((As used in this section, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:

       (a) "Financial information" means, to the extent it is nonpublic, any of the following information identifiable to the individual that concerns the amount and conditions of an individual's assets, liabilities, or credit:

       (i) Account numbers and balances;

       (ii) Transactional information concerning any account; and

       (iii) Codes, passwords, social security numbers, tax identification numbers, driver's license or permit numbers, state identicard numbers issued by the department of licensing, and other information held for the purpose of account access or transaction initiation.

       (b) "Financial information repository" means any person engaged in the business of providing services to customers who have a credit, deposit, trust, stock, or other financial account or relationship with the person.

       (c) "Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation, or association.

       (4))) No provision of this section shall be construed so as to prevent any action by a law enforcement agency, or any officer, employee, or agent of such agency, or any action of an agent of the financial information repository when working in conjunction with a law enforcement agency.

       (((5))) (4) This section does not apply to:

       (a) Efforts by the financial information repository to test security procedures or systems of the financial institution repository for maintaining the confidentiality of customer information;

       (b) Investigation of alleged employee misconduct or negligence; or

       (c) Efforts to recover financial or personal information of the financial institution obtained or received by another person in any manner described in subsection (1) or (2) of this section.

       (((6))) (5) Violation of this section is a class C felony.

       (((7))) (6) A person ((that [who])) who violates this section is liable for five hundred dollars or actual damages, whichever is greater, and reasonable attorneys' fees. If the person violating this section is a business that repeatedly violates this section, that person also violates the Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW.

       Sec. 16. RCW 9.35.020 and 1999 c 368 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) No person may knowingly use or knowingly transfer a means of identification of another person with the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, any unlawful activity harming or intending to harm the person whose identity is used, or for committing any felony.

 

 

       (2) ((For purposes of this section, "means of identification" means any information or item that is not describing finances or credit but is personal to or identifiable with any individual or other person, including any current or former name of the person, telephone number, and electronic address or identifier of the individual or any member of his or her family, including the ancestor of such person; any information relating to a change in name, address, telephone number, or electronic address or identifier of the individual or his or her family; any social security, driver's license, or tax identification number of the individual or any member of his or her family; and other information which could be used to identify the person, including unique biometric data.

       (3))) Violation of this section is a class C felony.

       (((4))) (3) A person ((that [who])) who violates this section is liable for five hundred dollars or actual damages, including costs to repair the person's credit record, whichever is greater, and reasonable attorneys' fees. If the person violating this section is a business that repeatedly violates this section, that person also violates the Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 17. Sections 1 through 11 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 19 RCW.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. Section captions used in sections 1 through 13 of this act are not part of the law.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 20. Sections 1 through 11 and 17 through 20 of this act take effect June 1, 2001."

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Prentice, the following title amendment was adopted:

      On page 1, line 3 of the title, after "information;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 19.16.250, 9.35.010, and 9.35.020; adding new sections to chapter 9.35 RCW; adding a new chapter to Title 19 RCW; creating a new section; prescribing penalties; and providing an effective date."

      On motion of Senator Prentice, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6513 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6513.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6513 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 41; Nays, 6; Absent, 1; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheldon, B., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, Winsley and Wojahn - 41.

     Voting nay: Senators Finkbeiner, Johnson, Sheahan, Sheldon, T., West and Zarelli - 6.

     Absent: Senator Deccio - 1.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6513, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6401, by Senators Kohl-Welles, Costa, Hargrove, Winsley, Rasmussen and McAuliffe (by request of Governor Locke)

 

Protecting vulnerable adults.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Heavey, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6401 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6401 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Heavey, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6401 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6401.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6401 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 48.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6401, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS

 

      The President welcomed and introduced members of the Teens Against Tobacco, and members of the SOUL Stomp--stomping out unfiltered lives to promote and encourage the funding of tobacco prevention--who were seated in the gallery.

 

 

PERSONAL PRIVILEGE

 

      Senator Thibaudeau: “A point of personal privilege, Mr. President. The point is that I have worked with some of these people that you have just introduced and they are extremely impressive--young--but very impressive and they are going to be down on this floor one of these fine days. The other point I would like to make is that as we went around the community, various communities, across the state and asked for their suggestions. Each one of them said, ‘Young people must be involved.’ I would like to commend these young people for that involvement. Thank you, Mr. President.”

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6502, by Senators Winsley, Thibaudeau and Kohl-Welles (by request of Department of Social and Health Services)

 

Changing provisions on long-term care training.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Thibaudeau, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6502 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6502 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Thibaudeau, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6502 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6502.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6502 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 48.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6502, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6217, by Senators Hargrove, Long, Costa and Winsley

 

Changing provisions relating to dependent children.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6217 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6217 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, the following striking amendment by Senators Hargrove and Long was adopted:

       Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

       "Sec. 1. RCW 13.34.030 and 1999 c 267 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

       For purposes of this chapter:

       (1) "Abandoned" means when the child's parent, guardian, or other custodian has expressed, either by statement or conduct, an intent to forego, for an extended period, parental rights or responsibilities despite an ability to exercise such rights and responsibilities. If the court finds that the petitioner has exercised due diligence in attempting to locate the parent, no contact between the child and the child's parent, guardian, or other custodian for a period of three months creates a rebuttable presumption of abandonment, even if there is no expressed intent to abandon.

       (2) "Child" and "juvenile" means any individual under the age of eighteen years.

       (((2))) (3) "Current placement episode" means the period of time that begins with the most recent date that the child was removed from the home of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian for purposes of placement in out-of-home care and continues until: (a) The child returns home((,)) ; (b) an adoption decree, a permanent custody order, or guardianship order is entered((,)); or (c) the dependency is dismissed, whichever occurs ((soonest)) first. ((If the most recent date of removal occurred prior to the filing of a dependency petition under this chapter or after filing but prior to entry of a disposition order, such time periods shall be included when calculating the length of a child's current placement episode.

       (3))) (4) "Dependency guardian" means the person, nonprofit corporation, or Indian tribe appointed by the court pursuant to ((RCW 13.34.232)) this chapter for the limited purpose of assisting the court in the supervision of the dependency.

       (((4))) (5) "Dependent child" means any child who:

       (a) ((Who)) Has been abandoned; ((that is, where the child's parent, guardian, or other custodian has expressed either by statement or conduct, an intent to forego, for an extended period, parental rights or parental responsibilities despite an ability to do so. If the court finds that the petitioner has exercised due diligence in attempting to locate the parent, no contact between the child and the child's parent, guardian, or other custodian for a period of three months creates a rebuttable presumption of abandonment, even if there is no expressed intent to abandon;))

       (b) ((Who)) Is abused or neglected as defined in chapter 26.44 RCW by a person legally responsible for the care of the child; or

       (c) ((Who)) Has no parent, guardian, or custodian capable of adequately caring for the child, such that the child is in circumstances which constitute a danger of substantial damage to the child's psychological or physical development.

       (((5))) (6) "Developmental disability" means a disability attributable to mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism, or another neurological or other condition of an individual found by the secretary to be closely related to mental retardation or to require treatment similar to that required for individuals with mental retardation, which disability originates before the individual attains age eighteen, which has continued or can be expected to continue indefinitely, and which constitutes a substantial handicap to the individual.

       (7) "Guardian" means the person or agency that: (a) Has been appointed as the guardian of a child in a legal proceeding other than a proceeding under this chapter; and (b) has the legal right to custody of the child pursuant to such appointment. The term "guardian" shall not include a "dependency guardian" appointed pursuant to a proceeding under this chapter.

       (((6))) (8) "Guardian ad litem" means a person, appointed by the court to represent the best interests of a child in a proceeding under this chapter, or in any matter which may be consolidated with a proceeding under this chapter. A "court-appointed special advocate" appointed by the court to be the guardian ad litem for the child, or to perform substantially the same duties and functions as a guardian ad litem, shall be deemed to be guardian ad litem for all purposes and uses of this chapter.

       (((7))) (9) "Guardian ad litem program" means a court-authorized volunteer program, which is or may be established by the superior court of the county in which such proceeding is filed, to manage all aspects of volunteer guardian ad litem representation for children alleged or found to be dependent. Such management shall include but is not limited to: Recruitment, screening, training, supervision, assignment, and discharge of volunteers.

       (((8))) (10) "Indigent" means a person who, at any stage of a court proceeding, is:

       (a) Receiving one of the following types of public assistance: Temporary assistance for needy families, general assistance, poverty-related veterans' benefits, food stamps or food stamp benefits transferred electronically, refugee resettlement benefits, medicaid, or supplemental security income; or

       (b) Involuntarily committed to a public mental health facility; or

       (c) Receiving an annual income, after taxes, of one hundred twenty-five percent or less of the federally established poverty level; or

       (d) Unable to pay the anticipated cost of counsel for the matter before the court because his or her available funds are insufficient to pay any amount for the retention of counsel.

       (11) "Out-of-home care" means placement in a foster family home or group care facility licensed pursuant to chapter 74.15 RCW or placement in a home, other than that of the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian, not required to be licensed pursuant to chapter 74.15 RCW.

       (((9))) (12) "Preventive services" means preservation services, as defined in chapter 74.14C RCW, and other reasonably available services, including housing services, capable of preventing the need for out-of-home placement while protecting the child. Housing services may include, but are not limited to, referrals to federal, state, local, or private agencies or organizations, assistance with forms and applications, or financial subsidies for housing.

       (13) "Shelter care" means temporary physical care in a facility licensed pursuant to RCW 74.15.030 or in a home not required to be licensed pursuant to RCW 74.15.030.

       (14) "Social study" means a written evaluation of matters relevant to the disposition of the case and shall contain the following information:

       (a) A statement of the specific harm or harms to the child that intervention is designed to alleviate;

       (b) A description of the specific services and activities, for both the parents and child, that are needed in order to prevent serious harm to the child; the reasons why such services and activities are likely to be useful; the availability of any proposed services; and the agency's overall plan for ensuring that the services will be delivered. The description shall identify the services chosen and approved by the parent;

       (c) If removal is recommended, a full description of the reasons why the child cannot be protected adequately in the home, including a description of any previous efforts to work with the parents and the child in the home; the in-home treatment programs that have been considered and rejected; the preventive services that have been offered or provided and have failed to prevent the need for out-of-home placement, unless the health, safety, and welfare of the child cannot be protected adequately in the home; and the parents' attitude toward placement of the child;

       (d) A statement of the likely harms the child will suffer as a result of removal;

       (e) A description of the steps that will be taken to minimize the harm to the child that may result if separation occurs; and

       (f) Behavior that will be expected before determination that supervision of the family or placement is no longer necessary.

       Sec. 2. RCW 13.34.040 and 1977 ex.s. c 291 s 32 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) Any person may file with the clerk of the superior court a petition showing that there is within the county, or residing within the county, a dependent child and ((praying)) requesting that the superior court deal with such child as provided in this chapter((: PROVIDED, That)). There shall be no fee for filing such petitions.

       (2) In counties having paid probation officers, ((such)) these officers shall, ((as far as)) to the extent possible, first determine if ((such)) a petition is reasonably justifiable. ((Such)) Each petition shall be verified and ((shall)) contain a statement of facts constituting ((such)) a dependency, ((as defined in this chapter,)) and the names and residence, if known to the petitioner, of the parents, guardian, or custodian of ((such)) the alleged dependent child. ((There shall be no fee for filing such petitions.))

       Sec. 3. RCW 13.34.050 and 1998 c 328 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) The court may enter an order directing a law enforcement officer, probation counselor, or child protective services official to take a child into custody if: (a) A petition is filed with the juvenile court alleging that the child is dependent and that the child's health, safety, and welfare will be seriously endangered if not taken into custody; (b) an affidavit or declaration is filed by the department in support of the petition setting forth specific factual information evidencing reasonable grounds that the child's health, safety, and welfare will be seriously endangered if not taken into custody and at least one of the grounds set forth demonstrates a risk of imminent harm to the child. "Imminent harm" for purposes of this section shall include, but not be limited to, circumstances of sexual abuse, or sexual exploitation as defined in RCW 26.44.020; and (c) the court finds reasonable grounds to believe the child is dependent and that the child's health, safety, and welfare will be seriously endangered if not taken into custody.

       (2) Any petition that does not have the necessary affidavit or declaration demonstrating a risk of imminent harm requires that the parents are provided notice and an opportunity to be heard ((by the parents)) before the order may be entered.

       (3) The petition and supporting documentation must be served on the parent, and ((the entity with whom)) if the child is in custody at the time the child is removed, on the entity with custody other than the parent. Failure to effect service does not invalidate the petition if service was attempted and the parent could not be found.

       Sec. 4. RCW 13.34.060 and 1999 c 17 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) A child taken into custody pursuant to RCW 13.34.050 or 26.44.050 shall be immediately placed in shelter care. A child taken by a relative of the child in violation of RCW 9A.40.060 or 9A.40.070 shall be placed in shelter care only when permitted under RCW 13.34.055. (("Shelter care" means temporary physical care in a facility licensed pursuant to RCW 74.15.030 or in a home not required to be licensed pursuant to that section.))

       (a) Unless there is reasonable cause to believe that the health, safety, or welfare of the child would be jeopardized or that the efforts to reunite the parent and child will be hindered, priority placement for a child in shelter care shall be with any person described in RCW 74.15.020(2)(a). The person must be willing and available to care for the child and be able to meet any special needs of the child. If a child is not initially placed with a relative pursuant to this section, the supervising agency shall make an effort within available resources to place the child with a relative on the next business day after the child is taken into custody. The supervising agency shall document its effort to place the child with a relative pursuant to this section. Nothing within this subsection (1)(a) establishes an entitlement to services or a right to a particular placement.

       (b) Whenever a child is taken into ((such)) custody pursuant to this section, the supervising agency may authorize evaluations of the child's physical or emotional condition, routine medical and dental examination and care, and all necessary emergency care. In no case may a child who is taken into custody pursuant to RCW 13.34.055, 13.34.050, or 26.44.050 be detained in a secure detention facility. No child may be held longer than seventy-two hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, after such child is taken into custody unless a court order has been entered for continued shelter care. The child and his or her parent, guardian, or custodian shall be informed that they have a right to a shelter care hearing. The court shall hold a shelter care hearing within seventy-two hours after the child is taken into custody, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. If a parent, guardian, or legal custodian desires to waive the shelter care hearing, the court shall determine, on the record and with the parties present, ((that)) whether such waiver is knowing and voluntary.

       (2) Whenever a child is taken into custody by child protective services pursuant to a court order issued under RCW 13.34.050 or when child protective services is notified that a child has been taken into custody pursuant to RCW 26.44.050 or 26.44.056, child protective services shall make reasonable efforts to inform the parents, guardian, or legal custodian of the fact that the child has been taken into custody, the reasons why the child was taken into custody, and their legal rights under this title as soon as possible and in no event ((longer)) shall notice be provided more than twenty-four hours after the child has been taken into custody or twenty-four hours after child protective services has been notified that the child has been taken into custody. The notice of custody and rights may be given by any means reasonably certain of notifying the parents including, but not limited to, written, telephone, or in person oral notification. If the initial notification is provided by a means other than writing, child protective services shall make reasonable efforts to also provide written notification.

       ((The written notice of custody and rights shall be in substantially the following form:

 

"NOTICE

 

       Your child has been placed in temporary custody under the supervision of Child Protective Services (or other person or agency). You have important legal rights and you must take steps to protect your interests.

       1. A court hearing will be held before a judge within 72 hours of the time your child is taken into custody. You should call the court at    (insert appropriate phone number here)    for specific information about the date, time, and location of the court hearing.

       2. You have the right to have a lawyer represent you at the hearing. You have the right to records the department intends to rely upon. A lawyer can look at the files in your case, talk to child protective services and other agencies, tell you about the law, help you understand your rights, and help you at hearings. If you cannot afford a lawyer, the court will appoint one to represent you. To get a court-appointed lawyer you must contact:    (explain local procedure)   .

       3. At the hearing, you have the right to speak on your own behalf, to introduce evidence, to examine witnesses, and to receive a decision based solely on the evidence presented to the judge.

       4. If your hearing occurs before a court commissioner, you have the right to have the decision of the court commissioner reviewed by a superior court judge. To obtain that review, you must, within ten days after the entry of the decision of the court commissioner, file with the court a motion for revision of the decision, as provided in RCW 2.24.050.

       You should be present at this hearing. If you do not come, the judge will not hear what you have to say.

       You may call the Child Protective Services' caseworker for more information about your child. The caseworker's name and telephone number are:    (insert name and telephone number)   ."

 

       Upon receipt of the written notice, the parent, guardian, or legal custodian shall acknowledge such notice by signing a receipt prepared by child protective services. If the parent, guardian, or legal custodian does not sign the receipt, the reason for lack of a signature shall be written on the receipt. The receipt shall be made a part of the court's file in the dependency action.

       If after making reasonable efforts to provide notification, child protective services is unable to determine the whereabouts of the parents, guardian, or legal custodian, the notice shall be delivered or sent to the last known address of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian.

       (3) If child protective services is not required to give notice under subsection (2) of this section, the juvenile court counselor assigned to the matter shall make all reasonable efforts to advise the parents, guardian, or legal custodian of the time and place of any shelter care hearing, request that they be present, and inform them of their basic rights as provided in RCW 13.34.090.

       (4) Reasonable efforts to advise and to give notice, as required in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, shall include, at a minimum, investigation of the whereabouts of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian. If such reasonable efforts are not successful, or the parent, guardian, or legal custodian does not appear at the shelter care hearing, the juvenile court counselor or caseworker shall testify at the hearing or state in a declaration:

       (a) The efforts made to investigate the whereabouts of, and to advise, the parent, guardian, or legal custodian; and

       (b) Whether actual advice of rights was made, to whom it was made, and how it was made, including the substance of any oral communication or copies of written materials used.

       (5) At the commencement of the shelter care hearing the court shall advise the parties of their basic rights as provided in RCW 13.34.090 and shall appoint counsel pursuant to RCW 13.34.090 if counsel has not been retained by the parent or guardian and if the parent or guardian is indigent, unless the court finds that the right to counsel has been expressly and voluntarily waived in court.

       (6) The court shall hear evidence regarding notice given to, and efforts to notify, the parent, guardian, or legal custodian and shall examine the need for shelter care. The court shall hear evidence regarding the efforts made to place the child with a relative. The court shall make an express finding as to whether the notice required under subsections (2) and (3) of this section was given to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian. All parties have the right to present testimony to the court regarding the need or lack of need for shelter care. Hearsay evidence before the court regarding the need or lack of need for shelter care must be supported by sworn testimony, affidavit, or declaration of the person offering such evidence.

       (7) The juvenile court probation counselor shall submit a recommendation to the court as to the further need for shelter care, except that such recommendation shall be submitted by the department of social and health services in cases where the petition alleging dependency has been filed by the department of social and health services, unless otherwise ordered by the court.

       (8) The court shall release a child alleged to be dependent to the care, custody, and control of the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian unless the court finds there is reasonable cause to believe that:

       (a) After consideration of the specific services that have been provided, reasonable efforts have been made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the child's home and to make it possible for the child to return home; and

       (b)(i) The child has no parent, guardian, or legal custodian to provide supervision and care for such child; or

       (ii) The release of such child would present a serious threat of substantial harm to such child; or

       (iii) The parent, guardian, or custodian to whom the child could be released is alleged to have violated RCW 9A.40.060 or 9A.40.070.

       If the court does not release the child to his or her parent, guardian, or legal custodian, and the child was initially placed with a relative pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, the court shall order continued placement with a relative, unless there is reasonable cause to believe the safety or welfare of the child would be jeopardized. If the child was not initially placed with a relative, and the court does not release the child to his or her parent, guardian, or legal custodian, the supervising agency shall make reasonable efforts to locate a relative pursuant to subsection (1) of this section. If a relative is not available, the court shall order continued shelter care or order placement with another suitable person, and the court shall set forth its reasons for the order. The court shall enter a finding as to whether subsections (2) and (3) of this section have been complied with. If actual notice was not given to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian and the whereabouts of such person is known or can be ascertained, the court shall order the supervising agency or the department of social and health services to make reasonable efforts to advise the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the status of the case, including the date and time of any subsequent hearings, and their rights under RCW 13.34.090.

       (9) An order releasing the child on any conditions specified in this section may at any time be amended, with notice and hearing thereon, so as to return the child to shelter care for failure of the parties to conform to the conditions originally imposed.

       The court shall consider whether nonconformance with any conditions resulted from circumstances beyond the control of the parent and give weight to that fact before ordering return of the child to shelter care.

       (10) A shelter care order issued pursuant to this section may be amended at any time with notice and hearing thereon. The shelter care decision of placement shall be modified only upon a showing of change in circumstances. No child may be detained for longer than thirty days without an order, signed by the judge, authorizing continued shelter care.

       (11) Any parent, guardian, or legal custodian who for good cause is unable to attend the initial shelter care hearing may request that a subsequent shelter care hearing be scheduled. The request shall be made to the clerk of the court where the petition is filed prior to the initial shelter care hearing. The hearing shall be held within seventy-two hours of the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. The clerk shall notify all other parties of the hearing by any reasonable means.))

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. A new section is added to chapter 13.34 RCW to read as follows:

       (1) The written notice of custody and rights required by RCW 13.34.060 shall be in substantially the following form:

 

"NOTICE

 

       Your child has been placed in temporary custody under the supervision of Child Protective Services (or other person or agency). You have important legal rights and you must take steps to protect your interests.

       1. A court hearing will be held before a judge within 72 hours of the time your child is taken into custody excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. You should call the court at    (insert appropriate phone number here)    for specific information about the date, time, and location of the court hearing.

       2. You have the right to have a lawyer represent you at the hearing. You have the right to records the department intends to rely upon. A lawyer can look at the files in your case, talk to child protective services and other agencies, tell you about the law, help you understand your rights, and help you at hearings. If you cannot afford a lawyer, the court will appoint one to represent you. To get a court-appointed lawyer you must contact:    (explain local procedure)   .

       3. At the hearing, you have the right to speak on your own behalf, to introduce evidence, to examine witnesses, and to receive a decision based solely on the evidence presented to the judge.

       4. If your hearing occurs before a court commissioner, you have the right to have the decision of the court commissioner reviewed by a superior court judge. To obtain that review, you must, within ten days after the entry of the decision of the court commissioner, file with the court a motion for revision of the decision, as provided in RCW 2.24.050.

       You should be present at any shelter care hearing. If you do not come, the judge will not hear what you have to say.

       You may call the Child Protective Services' caseworker for more information about your child. The caseworker's name and telephone number are:    (insert name and telephone number)   ."

       Upon receipt of the written notice, the parent, guardian, or legal custodian shall acknowledge such notice by signing a receipt prepared by child protective services. If the parent, guardian, or legal custodian does not sign the receipt, the reason for lack of a signature shall be written on the receipt. The receipt shall be made a part of the court's file in the dependency action.

       If after making reasonable efforts to provide notification, child protective services is unable to determine the whereabouts of the parents, guardian, or legal custodian, the notice shall be delivered or sent to the last known address of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian.

       (2) If child protective services is not required to give notice under RCW 13.34.060(2) and subsection (1) of this section, the juvenile court counselor assigned to the matter shall make all reasonable efforts to advise the parents, guardian, or legal custodian of the time and place of any shelter care hearing, request that they be present, and inform them of their basic rights as provided in RCW 13.34.090.

       (3) Reasonable efforts to advise and to give notice, as required in RCW 13.34.060(2) and subsections (1) and (2) of this section, shall include, at a minimum, investigation of the whereabouts of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian. If such reasonable efforts are not successful, or the parent, guardian, or legal custodian does not appear at the shelter care hearing, the petitioner shall testify at the hearing or state in a declaration:

       (a) The efforts made to investigate the whereabouts of, and to advise, the parent, guardian, or legal custodian; and

       (b) Whether actual advice of rights was made, to whom it was made, and how it was made, including the substance of any oral communication or copies of written materials used.

       (4) The court shall hear evidence regarding notice given to, and efforts to notify, the parent, guardian, or legal custodian and shall examine the need for shelter care. The court shall hear evidence regarding the efforts made to place the child with a relative. The court shall make an express finding as to whether the notice required under RCW 13.34.060(2) and subsections (1) and (2) of this section was given to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian. All parties have the right to present testimony to the court regarding the need or lack of need for shelter care. Hearsay evidence before the court regarding the need or lack of need for shelter care must be supported by sworn testimony, affidavit, or declaration of the person offering such evidence.

       (5) A shelter care order issued pursuant to section 7 of this act may be amended at any time with notice and hearing thereon. The shelter care decision of placement shall be modified only upon a showing of change in circumstances. No child may be placed in shelter care for longer than thirty days without an order, signed by the judge, authorizing continued shelter care.

       (6) Any parent, guardian, or legal custodian who for good cause is unable to attend the initial shelter care hearing may request that a subsequent shelter care hearing be scheduled. The request shall be made to the clerk of the court where the petition is filed prior to the initial shelter care hearing. Upon the request of the parent, the court shall schedule the hearing within seventy-two hours of the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. The clerk shall notify all other parties of the hearing by any reasonable means.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. A new section is added to chapter 13.34 RCW to read as follows:

       At the commencement of the shelter care hearing the court shall advise the parties of basic rights as provided in RCW 13.34.090 and appoint counsel pursuant to RCW 13.34.090 if the parent or guardian is indigent unless counsel has been retained by the parent or guardian or the court finds that the right to counsel has been expressly and voluntarily waived in court.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. A new section is added to chapter 13.34 RCW to read as follows:

       (1) The juvenile court probation counselor shall submit a recommendation to the court as to the further need for shelter care unless the petition has been filed by the department, in which case the recommendation shall be submitted by the department.

       (2) The court shall release a child alleged to be dependent to the care, custody, and control of the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian unless the court finds there is reasonable cause to believe that:

       (a) After consideration of the specific services that have been provided, reasonable efforts have been made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the child's home and to make it possible for the child to return home; and

       (b)(i) The child has no parent, guardian, or legal custodian to provide supervision and care for such child; or

       (ii) The release of such child would present a serious threat of substantial harm to such child; or

       (iii) The parent, guardian, or custodian to whom the child could be released has been charged with violating RCW 9A.40.060 or 9A.40.070.

       If the court does not release the child to his or her parent, guardian, or legal custodian, and the child was initially placed with a relative pursuant to RCW 13.34.060(1), the court shall order continued placement with a relative, unless there is reasonable cause to believe the health, safety, or welfare of the child would be jeopardized. If the child was not initially placed with a relative, and the court does not release the child to his or her parent, guardian, or legal custodian, the supervising agency shall make reasonable efforts to locate a relative pursuant to RCW 13.34.060(1). If a relative is not available, the court shall order continued shelter care or order placement with another suitable person, and the court shall set forth its reasons for the order. The court shall enter a finding as to whether RCW 13.34.060(2) and subsections (1) and (2) of this section have been complied with. If actual notice was not given to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian and the whereabouts of such person is known or can be ascertained, the court shall order the supervising agency or the department of social and health services to make reasonable efforts to advise the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the status of the case, including the date and time of any subsequent hearings, and their rights under RCW 13.34.090.

       (3) An order releasing the child on any conditions specified in this section may at any time be amended, with notice and hearing thereon, so as to return the child to shelter care for failure of the parties to conform to the conditions originally imposed.

       The court shall consider whether nonconformance with any conditions resulted from circumstances beyond the control of the parent and give weight to that fact before ordering return of the child to shelter care.

       Sec. 8. RCW 13.34.070 and 1993 c 358 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) Upon the filing of the petition, the clerk of the court shall issue a summons, one directed to the child, if the child is twelve or more years of age, and another to the parents, guardian, or custodian, and such other persons as appear to the court to be proper or necessary parties to the proceedings, requiring them to appear personally before the court at the time fixed to hear the petition. If the child is developmentally disabled and not living at home, the notice shall be given to the child's custodian as well as to the child's parent. The developmentally disabled child shall not be required to appear unless requested by the court. ((Where)) When the custodian is summoned, the parent or guardian or both shall also be served with a summons. The fact-finding hearing on the petition shall be held no later than seventy-five days after the filing of the petition, unless exceptional reasons for a continuance are found. The party requesting the continuance shall have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that exceptional circumstances ((do)) exist. To ensure that the hearing on the petition occurs within the seventy-five day time limit, the court shall schedule and hear the matter on an expedited basis.

       (2) A copy of the petition shall be attached to each summons.

       (3) The summons shall advise the parties of the right to counsel. The summons shall also inform the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian of his or (([her])) her right to appointed counsel, if indigent, and of the procedure to use to secure appointed counsel.

       (4) The summons shall advise the parents that they may be held responsible for the support of the child if the child is placed in out-of-home care.

       (5) The judge may endorse upon the summons an order directing any parent, guardian, or custodian having the custody or control of the child to bring the child to the hearing.

       (6) If it appears from affidavit or sworn statement presented to the judge that there is probable cause for the issuance of a warrant of arrest or that the child needs to be taken into custody pursuant to RCW 13.34.050, the judge may endorse upon the summons an order that an officer serving the summons shall at once take the child into custody and take him or her to the place of shelter designated by the court.

       (7) If the person summoned as provided in this section is subject to an order of the court pursuant to subsection (5) or (6) of this section, and if the person fails to abide by the order, he or she may be proceeded against as for contempt of court. The order endorsed upon the summons shall conspicuously display the following legend:

 

NOTICE:

VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER

IS SUBJECT TO PROCEEDING

FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT

PURSUANT TO RCW 13.34.070.

 

       (8) If a party to be served with a summons can be found within the state, the summons shall be served upon the party personally as soon as possible following the filing of the petition, but in no case later than fifteen court days before the fact-finding hearing, or such time as set by the court. If the party is within the state and cannot be personally served, but the party's address is known or can with reasonable diligence be ascertained, the summons may be served upon the party by mailing a copy ((thereof)) by certified mail as soon as possible following the filing of the petition, but in no case later than fifteen court days before the hearing, or such time as set by the court. If a party other than the child is without the state but can be found or the address is known, or can with reasonable diligence be ascertained, service of the summons may be made either by delivering a copy ((thereof)) to the party personally or by mailing a copy thereof to the party by certified mail at least ten court days before the fact-finding hearing, or such time as set by the court.

       (9) Service of summons may be made under the direction of the court by any person eighteen years of age or older who is not a party to the proceedings or by any law enforcement officer, probation counselor, or department ((of social and health services social worker)) employee.

       (10) In any proceeding brought under this chapter where the court knows or has reason to know that the child involved is a member or is eligible to be a member of an Indian tribe, notice of the pendency of the proceeding shall also be sent by registered mail, return receipt requested, to the child's tribe. If the identity or location of the tribe cannot be determined, such notice shall be transmitted to the secretary of the interior of the United States.

       Sec. 9. RCW 13.34.080 and 1990 c 246 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

       ((In a dependency case where it appears by the petition or verified statement, that the person standing in the position of natural or legal guardian of the person of any child, is a nonresident of this state, or that the name or place of residence or whereabouts of such person is unknown, as well as in all cases where, after due diligence, the officer has been unable to make service of the summons or notice provided for in RCW 13.34.070, and a copy of the notice has been deposited in the post office, postage prepaid, directed to such person at his last known place of residence,)) (1) The court shall direct the clerk to publish notice in a legal newspaper printed in the county, qualified to publish summons, once a week for three consecutive weeks, with the first publication of the notice to be at least twenty-five days prior to the date fixed for the hearing when it appears by the petition or verified statement that:

       (a)(i) The parent or guardian is a nonresident of this state; or

       (ii) The name or place of residence or whereabouts of the parent or guardian is unknown; and

       (b) After due diligence, the person attempting service of the summons or notice provided for in RCW 13.34.070 has been unable to make service, and a copy of the notice has been deposited in the post office, postage prepaid, directed to such person at his or her last known place of residence. If the parent, guardian, or legal custodian is believed to be a resident of another state or a county other than the county in which the petition has been filed, notice also shall be published in the county in which the parent, guardian, or legal custodian is believed to reside.

       ((Additionally,)) (2) Publication may proceed simultaneously with efforts to provide ((personal)) service in person or ((service)) by mail ((for good cause shown)), when the court determines there is reason to believe that ((personal)) service in person or ((service)) by mail will not be successful. ((Such)) Notice shall be directed to the parent, parents, or other person claiming the right to the custody of the child, if their names are known((, or)). If their names are unknown, the phrase "To whom it may concern" shall be used ((and)), apply to, and be binding upon, ((any such)) those persons whose names are unknown. The name of the court, the name of the child (or children if of one family), the date of the filing of the petition, the date of hearing, and the object of the proceeding in general terms shall be set forth((, and the whole shall be subscribed by the clerk)). There shall be filed with the clerk an affidavit showing due publication of the notice((, and)). The cost of publication shall be paid by the county at a rate not ((to exceed)) greater than the rate paid ((by the county)) for other legal notices. The publication of notice shall be deemed equivalent to personal service upon all persons, known or unknown, who have been designated as provided in this section.

       Sec. 10. RCW 13.34.090 and 1998 c 328 s 3 and 1998 c 141 s 1 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

       (1) Any party has a right to be represented by an attorney in all proceedings under this chapter, to introduce evidence, to be heard in his or her own behalf, to examine witnesses, to receive a decision based solely on the evidence adduced at the hearing, and to an unbiased fact-finder.

       (2) At all stages of a proceeding in which a child is alleged to be dependent ((as defined in RCW 13.34.030(4))), the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian has the right to be represented by counsel, and if indigent, to have counsel appointed for him or her by the court. Unless waived in court, counsel shall be provided to the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian, if such person (a) has appeared in the proceeding or requested the court to appoint counsel and (b) is financially unable to obtain counsel because of indigency ((as defined in chapter 10.101 RCW)).

       (3) If a party to an action under this chapter is represented by counsel, no order shall be provided to that party for his or her signature without prior notice and provision of the order to counsel.

       (4) Copies of department of social and health services or supervising agency records to which parents have legal access pursuant to chapter 13.50 RCW shall be given to the child's parent, guardian, legal custodian, or his or her legal counsel, prior to any shelter care hearing and within fifteen days after the department or supervising agency receives a written request for such records from the parent, guardian, legal custodian, or his or her legal counsel. These records shall be provided to the child's parents, guardian, legal custodian, or legal counsel a reasonable period of time prior to the shelter care hearing in order to allow an opportunity to review the records prior to the hearing. These records shall be legible and shall be provided at no expense to the parents, guardian, legal custodian, or his or her counsel. When the records are served on legal counsel, legal counsel shall have the opportunity to review the records with the parents and shall review the records with the parents prior to the shelter care hearing.

       Sec. 11. RCW 13.34.110 and 1995 c 313 s 1 and 1995 c 311 s 27 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

       The court shall hold a fact-finding hearing on the petition and, unless the court dismisses the petition, shall make written findings of fact, stating the reasons therefor((, and after it has announced its findings of fact shall hold a hearing to consider disposition of the case immediately following the fact-finding hearing or at a continued hearing within fourteen days or longer for good cause shown)). Immediately after the entry of the findings of fact, the court shall hold a disposition hearing, unless there is good cause for continuing the matter. If good cause is shown, the case may be continued. Notice of the time and place of the continued hearing may be given in open court. If notice in open court is not given to a party, that party shall be notified by certified mail of the time and place of any continued hearing. Unless there is reasonable cause to believe the health, safety, or welfare of the child would be jeopardized or efforts to reunite the parent and child would be hindered, the court shall direct the department to notify those adult persons who: (1) Are related by blood or marriage to the child in the following degrees: Parent, grandparent, brother, sister, stepparent, stepbrother, stepsister, uncle, or aunt; (2) are known to the department as having been in contact with the family or child within the past twelve months; and (3) would be an appropriate placement for the child. Reasonable cause to dispense with notification to a parent under this section must be proved by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence.

       The parties need not appear at the fact-finding or dispositional hearing if the parties, their attorneys, the guardian ad litem, and court-appointed special advocates, if any, are all in agreement. The court shall receive and review a social study before entering an order based on agreement. No social file or social study may be considered by the court in connection with the fact-finding hearing or prior to factual determination, except as otherwise admissible under the rules of evidence. ((Notice of the time and place of the continued hearing may be given in open court. If notice in open court is not given to a party, that party shall be notified by mail of the time and place of any continued hearing.

       All hearings may be conducted at any time or place within the limits of the county, and such cases may not be heard in conjunction with other business of any other division of the superior court. The general public shall be excluded, and only such persons may be admitted who are found by the judge to have a direct interest in the case or in the work of the court. Unless the court states on the record the reasons to disallow attendance, the court shall allow a child's relatives and, if a child resides in foster care, the child's foster parent, to attend all hearings and proceedings pertaining to the child for the sole purpose of providing oral and written information about the child and the child's welfare to the court.

       Stenographic notes or any device which accurately records the proceedings may be required as provided in other civil cases pursuant to RCW 2.32.200.))

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. A new section is added to chapter 13.34 RCW to read as follows:

       All hearings may be conducted at any time or place within the limits of the county, and such cases may not be heard in conjunction with other business of any other division of the superior court. The public shall be excluded, and only such persons may be admitted who are found by the judge to have a direct interest in the case or in the work of the court. Unless the court states on the record the reasons to disallow attendance, the court shall allow a child's relatives and, if a child resides in foster care, the child's foster parent, to attend all hearings and proceedings pertaining to the child for the sole purpose of providing oral and written information about the child and the child's welfare to the court.

       Stenographic notes or any device which accurately records the proceedings may be required as provided in other civil cases pursuant to RCW 2.32.200.

       Sec. 13. RCW 13.34.120 and 1998 c 328 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

       (((1))) To aid the court in its decision on disposition, a social study((, consisting of a written evaluation of matters relevant to the disposition of the case,)) shall be made by the person or agency filing the petition. A parent may submit a counselor's or health care provider's evaluation of the parent, which shall either be included in the social study or considered in conjunction with the social study. The study shall include all social ((records)) files and may also include facts relating to the child's cultural heritage, and shall be made available to the court. The court shall consider the social file, social study, guardian ad litem report, the court-appointed special advocate's report, if any, and any reports filed by a party at the disposition hearing in addition to evidence produced at the fact-finding hearing. At least ten working days before the disposition hearing, the department shall mail to the parent and his or her attorney a copy of the agency's social study and proposed service plan, which shall be in writing or in a form understandable to the parents or custodians. In addition, the department shall provide an opportunity for parents to review and comment on the plan at the ((community service)) local office closest to the parents' residence. If the parents disagree with the agency's plan or any part thereof, the parents shall submit to the court at least twenty-four hours before the hearing, in writing, or signed oral statement, an alternative plan to correct the problems which led to the finding of dependency. This section shall not interfere with the right of the parents or custodians to submit oral arguments regarding the disposition plan at the hearing.

       (((2) In addition to the requirements set forth in subsection (1) of this section, a predisposition study to the court in cases of dependency alleged pursuant to RCW 13.34.030(4) (b) or (c) shall contain the following information:

       (a) A statement of the specific harm or harms to the child that intervention is designed to alleviate;

       (b) A description of the specific programs, for both the parents and child, that are needed in order to prevent serious harm to the child; the reasons why such programs are likely to be useful; the availability of any proposed services; and the agency's overall plan for ensuring that the services will be delivered. The description shall identify services chosen and approved by the parent;

       (c) If removal is recommended, a full description of the reasons why the child cannot be protected adequately in the home, including a description of any previous efforts to work with the parents and the child in the home; the in-home treatment programs which have been considered and rejected; the preventive services that have been offered or provided and have failed to prevent the need for out-of-home placement, unless the health, safety, and welfare of the child cannot be protected adequately in the home; and the parents' attitude toward placement of the child;

       (d) A statement of the likely harms the child will suffer as a result of removal. This section should include an exploration of the nature of the parent-child attachment and the meaning of separation and loss to both the parents and the child;

       (e) A description of the steps that will be taken to minimize harm to the child that may result if separation occurs; and

       (f) Behavior that will be expected before determination that supervision of the family or placement is no longer necessary.))

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 14. A new section is added to chapter 13.34 RCW to read as follows:

       If the most recent date that a child was removed from the home of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian for purposes of placement in out-of-home care occurred prior to the filing of a dependency petition or after filing but prior to entry of a disposition order, such time periods shall be included when calculating the length of the child's current placement episode.

       Sec. 15. RCW 13.34.130 and 1999 c 267 s 16, 1999 c 267 s 9, and 1999 c 173 s 3 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:

       If, after a fact-finding hearing pursuant to RCW 13.34.110, it has been proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the child is dependent within the meaning of RCW 13.34.030((;)) after consideration of the ((predisposition report)) social study prepared pursuant to RCW 13.34.110 and after a disposition hearing has been held pursuant to RCW 13.34.110, the court shall enter an order of disposition pursuant to this section.

       (1) The court shall order one of the following dispositions of the case:

       (a) Order a disposition other than removal of the child from his or her home, which shall provide a program designed to alleviate the immediate danger to the child, to mitigate or cure any damage the child has already suffered, and to aid the parents so that the child will not be endangered in the future. In ((selecting a program)) determining the disposition, the court should choose those services, including housing assistance, that least interfere with family autonomy((, provided that the services)) and are adequate to protect the child.

       (b) Order ((that)) the child to be removed from his or her home and ((ordered)) into the custody, control, and care of a relative or the department ((of social and health services)) or a licensed child placing agency for placement in a foster family home or group care facility licensed pursuant to chapter 74.15 RCW or in a home not required to be licensed pursuant to chapter 74.15 RCW. Unless there is reasonable cause to believe that the health, safety, or welfare of the child would be jeopardized or that efforts to reunite the parent and child will be hindered, such child shall be placed with a person who is: (i) Related to the child as defined in RCW 74.15.020(2)(a) ((and)) with whom the child has a relationship and is comfortable((,)); and ((who is)) (ii) willing and available to care for the child.

       (2) Placement of the child with a relative under this subsection shall be given preference by the court. An order for out-of-home placement may be made only if the court finds that reasonable efforts have been made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the child's home and to make it possible for the child to return home, specifying the services that have been provided to the child and the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian, and that preventive services have been offered or provided and have failed to prevent the need for out-of-home placement, unless the health, safety, and welfare of the child cannot be protected adequately in the home, and that:

       (((i))) (a) There is no parent or guardian available to care for such child;

       (((ii))) (b) The parent, guardian, or legal custodian is not willing to take custody of the child; or

       (((iii))) (c) The court finds, by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, a manifest danger exists that the child will suffer serious abuse or neglect if the child is not removed from the home and an order under RCW 26.44.063 would not protect the child from danger((; or

       (iv) The extent of the child's disability is such that the parent, guardian, or legal custodian is unable to provide the necessary care for the child and the parent, guardian, or legal custodian has determined that the child would benefit from placement outside of the home)).

       (((2))) (3) If the court has ordered a child removed from his or her home pursuant to subsection (1)(b) of this section, the court may order that a petition seeking termination of the parent and child relationship be filed if the ((court finds: (a) Termination is recommended by the supervising agency; (b) termination is in the best interests of the child; and (c) that because of the existence of aggravated circumstances, reasonable efforts to unify the family are not required. Notwithstanding the existence of aggravated circumstances, reasonable efforts may be required if the court or department determines it is in the best interest of the child. In determining whether aggravated circumstances exist by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, the court shall consider one or more of the following:

       (i) Conviction of the parent of rape of the child in the first, second, or third degree as defined in RCW 9A.44.073, 9A.44.076, and 9A.44.079;

       (ii) Conviction of the parent of criminal mistreatment of the child in the first or second degree as defined in RCW 9A.42.020 and 9A.42.030;

       (iii) Conviction of the parent of one of the following assault crimes, when the child is the victim: Assault in the first or second degree as defined in RCW 9A.36.011 and 9A.36.021 or assault of a child in the first or second degree as defined in RCW 9A.36.120 or 9A.36.130;

       (iv) Conviction of the parent of murder, manslaughter, or homicide by abuse of the child's other parent, sibling, or another child;

       (v) Conviction of the parent of attempting, soliciting, or conspiracy to commit a crime listed in (c)(i), (ii), (iii), or (iv) of this subsection;

       (vi) A finding by a court that a parent is a sexually violent predator as defined in RCW 71.09.020;

       (vii) Failure of the parent to complete available treatment ordered under this chapter or the equivalent laws of another state, where such failure has resulted in a prior termination of parental rights to another child and the parent has failed to effect significant change in the interim. In the case of a parent of an Indian child, as defined in the Indian Child Welfare Act, P.L. 95-608 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1903), the court shall also consider tribal efforts to assist the parent in completing treatment and make it possible for the child to return home;

       (viii) An infant under three years of age has been abandoned as defined in RCW 13.34.030(4)(a);

       (ix) The mother has given birth to three or more drug-affected infants, resulting in the department filing a petition under section 23, chapter 314, Laws of 1998;

       (x) Conviction of the parent of a sex offense under chapter 9A.44 RCW or incest under RCW 9A.64.020 when the child is born of the offense.

       (3) If reasonable efforts are not ordered under subsection (2) of this section a permanency planning hearing shall be held within thirty days. Reasonable efforts shall be made to place the child in a timely manner in accordance with the permanency plan, and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child.

       (4) Whenever a child is ordered removed from the child's home, the agency charged with his or her care shall provide the court with:

       (a) A permanency plan of care that shall identify one of the following outcomes as a primary goal and may identify additional outcomes as alternative goals: Return of the child to the home of the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian; adoption; guardianship; permanent legal custody; long-term relative or foster care, until the child is age eighteen, with a written agreement between the parties and the care provider; and independent living, if appropriate and if the child is age sixteen or older; or a responsible living skills program. Whenever a permanency plan identifies independent living as a goal, the plan shall also specifically identify the services that will be provided to assist the child to make a successful transition from foster care to independent living. Before the court approves independent living as a permanency plan of care, the court shall make a finding that the provision of services to assist the child in making a transition from foster care to independent living will allow the child to manage his or her financial affairs and to manage his or her personal, social, educational, and nonfinancial affairs. The department shall not discharge a child to an independent living situation before the child is eighteen years of age unless the child becomes emancipated pursuant to chapter 13.64 RCW.

       (b) Unless the court has ordered, pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, that a termination petition be filed, a specific plan as to where the child will be placed, what steps will be taken to return the child home, and what actions the agency will take to maintain parent-child ties. All aspects of the plan shall include the goal of achieving permanence for the child.

       (i) The agency plan shall specify what services the parents will be offered in order to enable them to resume custody, what requirements the parents must meet in order to resume custody, and a time limit for each service plan and parental requirement.

       (ii) The agency shall be required to encourage the maximum parent-child contact possible, including regular visitation and participation by the parents in the care of the child while the child is in placement. Visitation may be limited or denied only if the court determines that such limitation or denial is necessary to protect the child's health, safety, or welfare.

       (iii) A child shall be placed as close to the child's home as possible, preferably in the child's own neighborhood, unless the court finds that placement at a greater distance is necessary to promote the child's or parents' well-being.

       (iv) The agency charged with supervising a child in placement shall provide all reasonable services that are available within the agency, or within the community, or those services which the department of social and health services has existing contracts to purchase. It shall report to the court if it is unable to provide such services.

       (c) If the court has ordered, pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, that a termination petition be filed, a specific plan as to where the child will be placed, what steps will be taken to achieve permanency for the child, services to be offered or provided to the child, and, if visitation would be in the best interests of the child, a recommendation to the court regarding visitation between parent and child pending a fact-finding hearing on the termination petition. The agency shall not be required to develop a plan of services for the parents or provide services to the parents.

       (5) If the court determines that the continuation of reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate the need to remove the child from his or her home or to safely return the child home should not be part of the permanency plan of care for the child, reasonable efforts shall be made to place the child in a timely manner and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child.

       (6))) requirements of section 16 of this act are met.

       (4) If there is insufficient information at the time of the disposition hearing upon which to base a determination regarding the suitability of a proposed placement with a relative, the child shall remain in foster care and the court shall direct the supervising agency to conduct necessary background investigations as provided in chapter 74.15 RCW and report the results of such investigation to the court within thirty days. However, if such relative appears otherwise suitable and competent to provide care and treatment, the criminal history background check need not be completed before placement, but as soon as possible after placement. Any placements with relatives, pursuant to this section, shall be contingent upon cooperation by the relative with the agency case plan and compliance with court orders related to the care and supervision of the child including, but not limited to, court orders regarding parent-child contacts and any other conditions imposed by the court. Noncompliance with the case plan or court order shall be grounds for removal of the child from the relative's home, subject to review by the court.

       (((7) Except for children whose cases are reviewed by a citizen review board under chapter 13.70 RCW, the status of all children found to be dependent shall be reviewed by the court at least every six months from the beginning date of the placement episode or the date dependency is established, whichever is first, at a hearing in which it shall be determined whether court supervision should continue. The review shall include findings regarding the agency and parental completion of disposition plan requirements, and if necessary, revised permanency time limits. The supervising agency shall provide a foster parent, preadoptive parent, or relative with notice of, and their right to an opportunity to be heard in, a review hearing pertaining to the child, but only if that person is currently providing care to that child at the time of the hearing. This section shall not be construed to grant party status to any person who has been provided an opportunity to be heard.

       (a) A child shall not be returned home at the review hearing unless the court finds that a reason for removal as set forth in this section no longer exists. The parents, guardian, or legal custodian shall report to the court the efforts they have made to correct the conditions which led to removal. If a child is returned, casework supervision shall continue for a period of six months, at which time there shall be a hearing on the need for continued intervention.

       (b) If the child is not returned home, the court shall establish in writing:

       (i) Whether reasonable services have been provided to or offered to the parties to facilitate reunion, specifying the services provided or offered;

       (ii) Whether the child has been placed in the least-restrictive setting appropriate to the child's needs, including whether consideration and preference has been given to placement with the child's relatives;

       (iii) Whether there is a continuing need for placement and whether the placement is appropriate;

       (iv) Whether there has been compliance with the case plan by the child, the child's parents, and the agency supervising the placement;

       (v) Whether progress has been made toward correcting the problems that necessitated the child's placement in out-of-home care;

       (vi) Whether the parents have visited the child and any reasons why visitation has not occurred or has been infrequent;

       (vii) Whether additional services, including housing assistance, are needed to facilitate the return of the child to the child's parents; if so, the court shall order that reasonable services be offered specifying such services; and

       (viii) The projected date by which the child will be returned home or other permanent plan of care will be implemented.

       (c) The court at the review hearing may order that a petition seeking termination of the parent and child relationship be filed.

       (8) The court's ability to order housing assistance under this section is: (a) Limited to cases in which homelessness or the lack of adequate and safe housing is the primary reason for an out-of-home placement; and (b) subject to the availability of funds appropriated for this specific purpose.))

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 16. A new section is added to chapter 13.34 RCW to read as follows:

       A court may order that a petition seeking termination of the parent and child relationship be filed if the following requirements are met:

       (1) The court has removed the child from his or her home pursuant to RCW 13.34.130;

       (2) Termination is recommended by the supervising agency;

       (3) Termination is in the best interests of the child; and

       (4) Because of the existence of aggravated circumstances, reasonable efforts to unify the family are not required. Notwithstanding the existence of aggravated circumstances, reasonable efforts may be required if the court or department determines it is in the best interests of the child. In determining whether aggravated circumstances exist by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, the court shall consider one or more of the following:

       (a) Conviction of the parent of rape of the child in the first, second, or third degree as defined in RCW 9A.44.073, 9A.44.076, and 9A.44.079;

       (b) Conviction of the parent of criminal mistreatment of the child in the first or second degree as defined in RCW 9A.42.020 and 9A.42.030;

       (c) Conviction of the parent of one of the following assault crimes, when the child is the victim: Assault in the first or second degree as defined in RCW 9A.36.011 and 9A.36.021 or assault of a child in the first or second degree as defined in RCW 9A.36.120 or 9A.36.130;

       (d) Conviction of the parent of murder, manslaughter, or homicide by abuse of the child's other parent, sibling, or another child;

       (e) Conviction of the parent of attempting, soliciting, or conspiring to commit a crime listed in (a), (b), (c), or (d) of this subsection;

       (f) A finding by a court that a parent is a sexually violent predator as defined in RCW 71.09.020;

       (g) Failure of the parent to complete available treatment ordered under this chapter or the equivalent laws of another state, where such failure has resulted in a prior termination of parental rights to another child and the parent has failed to effect significant change in the interim. In the case of a parent of an Indian child, as defined in the Indian Child Welfare Act, P.L. 95-608 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1903), the court shall also consider tribal efforts to assist the parent in completing treatment and make it possible for the child to return home;

       (h) An infant under three years of age has been abandoned;

       (i) Conviction of the parent, when a child has been born of the offense, of: (A) A sex offense under chapter 9A.44 RCW; or (B) incest under RCW 9A.64.020.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 17. A new section is added to chapter 13.34 RCW to read as follows:

       If reasonable efforts are not ordered under section 16 of this act, a permanency planning hearing shall be held within thirty days of the court order to file a petition to terminate parental rights. Reasonable efforts shall be made to place the child in a timely manner in accordance with the permanency plan, and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. A new section is added to chapter 13.34 RCW to read as follows:

       (1) Whenever a child is ordered removed from the child's home, the agency charged with his or her care shall provide the court with:

       (a) A permanency plan of care that shall identify one of the following outcomes as a primary goal and may identify additional outcomes as alternative goals: Return of the child to the home of the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian; adoption; guardianship; permanent legal custody; long-term relative or foster care, until the child is age eighteen, with a written agreement between the parties and the care provider; successful completion of a responsible living skills program; or independent living, if appropriate and if the child is age sixteen or older. The department shall not discharge a child to an independent living situation before the child is eighteen years of age unless the child becomes emancipated pursuant to chapter 13.64 RCW;

       (b) Unless the court has ordered, pursuant to RCW 13.34.130(3), that a termination petition be filed, a specific plan as to where the child will be placed, what steps will be taken to return the child home, and what actions the agency will take to maintain parent-child ties. All aspects of the plan shall include the goal of achieving permanence for the child.

       (i) The agency plan shall specify what services the parents will be offered to enable them to resume custody, what requirements the parents must meet to resume custody, and a time limit for each service plan and parental requirement.

       (ii) The agency shall encourage the maximum parent-child contact possible, including regular visitation and participation by the parents in the care of the child while the child is in placement. Visitation may be limited or denied only if the court determines that such limitation or denial is necessary to protect the child's health, safety, or welfare.

       (iii) A child shall be placed as close to the child's home as possible, preferably in the child's own neighborhood, unless the court finds that placement at a greater distance is necessary to promote the child's or parents' well-being.

       (iv) The agency charged with supervising a child in placement shall provide all reasonable services that are available within the agency, or within the community, or those services which the department has existing contracts to purchase. It shall report to the court if it is unable to provide such services; and

       (c) If the court has ordered, pursuant to RCW 13.34.130(3), that a termination petition be filed, a specific plan as to where the child will be placed, what steps will be taken to achieve permanency for the child, services to be offered or provided to the child, and, if visitation would be in the best interests of the child, a recommendation to the court regarding visitation between parent and child pending a fact-finding hearing on the termination petition. The agency shall not be required to develop a plan of services for the parents or provide services to the parents if the court orders a termination petition be filed.

       (2) If the court determines that the continuation of reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate the need to remove the child from his or her home or to safely return the child home should not be part of the permanency plan of care for the child, reasonable efforts shall be made to place the child in a timely manner and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. A new section is added to chapter 13.34 RCW to read as follows:

       (1) Except for children whose cases are reviewed by a citizen review board under chapter 13.70 RCW, the status of all children found to be dependent shall be reviewed by the court at least every six months from the beginning date of the placement episode or the date dependency is established, whichever is first, at a hearing in which it shall be determined whether court supervision should continue. The review shall include findings regarding the agency and parental completion of disposition plan requirements, and if necessary, revised permanency time limits. The supervising agency shall provide a foster parent, preadoptive parent, or relative with notice of, and their right to an opportunity to be heard in, a review hearing pertaining to the child, but only if that person is currently providing care to that child at the time of the hearing. This section shall not be construed to grant party status to any person who has been provided an opportunity to be heard.

       (a) A child shall not be returned home at the review hearing unless the court finds that a reason for removal as set forth in RCW 13.34.130 no longer exists. The parents, guardian, or legal custodian shall report to the court the efforts they have made to correct the conditions which led to removal. If a child is returned, casework supervision shall continue for a period of six months, at which time there shall be a hearing on the need for continued intervention.

       (b) If the child is not returned home, the court shall establish in writing:

       (i) Whether reasonable services have been provided to or offered to the parties to facilitate reunion, specifying the services provided or offered;

       (ii) Whether the child has been placed in the least-restrictive setting appropriate to the child's needs, including whether consideration and preference has been given to placement with the child's relatives;

       (iii) Whether there is a continuing need for placement and whether the placement is appropriate;

       (iv) Whether there has been compliance with the case plan by the child, the child's parents, and the agency supervising the placement;

       (v) Whether progress has been made toward correcting the problems that necessitated the child's placement in out-of-home care;

       (vi) Whether the parents have visited the child and any reasons why visitation has not occurred or has been infrequent;

       (vii) Whether additional services, including housing assistance, are needed to facilitate the return of the child to the child's parents; if so, the court shall order that reasonable services be offered specifying such services; and

       (viii) The projected date by which the child will be returned home or other permanent plan of care will be implemented.

       (c) The court at the review hearing may order that a petition seeking termination of the parent and child relationship be filed.

       (2) The court's ability to order housing assistance under RCW 13.34.130 and this section is: (a) Limited to cases in which homelessness or the lack of adequate and safe housing is the primary reason for an out-of-home placement; and (b) subject to the availability of funds appropriated for this specific purpose.

       Sec. 20. RCW 13.34.145 and 1999 c 267 s 17 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) A permanency plan shall be developed no later than sixty days from the time the supervising agency assumes responsibility for providing services, including placing the child, or at the time of a hearing under RCW 13.34.130, whichever occurs first. The permanency planning process continues until a permanency planning goal is achieved or dependency is dismissed. The planning process shall include reasonable efforts to return the child to the parent's home.

       (a) Whenever a child is placed in out-of-home care pursuant to RCW 13.34.130, the agency that has custody of the child shall provide the court with a written permanency plan of care directed towards securing a safe, stable, and permanent home for the child as soon as possible. The plan shall identify one of the following outcomes as the primary goal and may also identify additional outcomes as alternative goals: Return of the child to the home of the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian; adoption; guardianship; permanent legal custody; long-term relative or foster care, until the child is age eighteen, with a written agreement between the parties and the care provider; a responsible living skills program; and independent living, if appropriate and if the child is age sixteen or older and the provisions of subsection (2) of this section are met.

       (b) The identified outcomes and goals of the permanency plan may change over time based upon the circumstances of the particular case.

       (c) Permanency planning goals should be achieved at the earliest possible date, preferably before the child has been in out-of-home care for fifteen months. In cases where parental rights have been terminated, the child is legally free for adoption, and adoption has been identified as the primary permanency planning goal, it shall be a goal to complete the adoption within six months following entry of the termination order.

       (d) For purposes related to permanency planning:

       (i) "Guardianship" means a dependency guardianship ((pursuant to this chapter)), a legal guardianship pursuant to chapter 11.88 RCW, or equivalent laws of another state or a federally recognized Indian tribe.

       (ii) "Permanent custody order" means a custody order entered pursuant to chapter 26.10 RCW.

       (iii) "Permanent legal custody" means legal custody pursuant to chapter 26.10 RCW or equivalent laws of another state or of a federally recognized Indian tribe.

       (2) Whenever a permanency plan identifies independent living as a goal, the plan shall also specifically identify the services that will be provided to assist the child to make a successful transition from foster care to independent living. Before the court approves independent living as a permanency plan of care, the court shall make a finding that the provision of services to assist the child in making a transition from foster care to independent living will allow the child to manage his or her financial ((affairs and to manage his or her)), personal, social, educational, and nonfinancial affairs. The department shall not discharge a child to an independent living situation before the child is eighteen years of age unless the child becomes emancipated pursuant to chapter 13.64 RCW.

       (3) A permanency planning hearing shall be held in all cases where the child has remained in out-of-home care for at least nine months and an adoption decree, guardianship order, or permanent custody order has not previously been entered. The hearing shall take place no later than twelve months following commencement of the current placement episode.

       (4) Whenever a child is removed from the home of a dependency guardian or long-term relative or foster care provider, and the child is not returned to the home of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian but is placed in out-of-home care, a permanency planning hearing shall take place no later than twelve months, as provided in subsection (3) of this section, following the date of removal unless, prior to the hearing, the child returns to the home of the dependency guardian or long-term care provider, the child is placed in the home of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian, an adoption decree, guardianship order, or a permanent custody order is entered, or the dependency is dismissed.

       (5) No later than ten working days prior to the permanency planning hearing, the agency having custody of the child shall submit a written permanency plan to the court and shall mail a copy of the plan to all parties and their legal counsel, if any.

       (6) At the permanency planning hearing, the court shall enter findings as required by ((RCW 13.34.130(7))) section 19 of this act and shall review the permanency plan prepared by the agency. If the child has resided in the home of a foster parent or relative for more than six months prior to the permanency planning hearing, the court shall also enter a finding regarding whether the foster parent or relative was informed of the hearing as required in RCW 74.13.280 and ((13.34.130(7))) section 19 of this act. If a goal of long-term foster or relative care has been achieved prior to the permanency planning hearing, the court shall review the child's status to determine whether the placement and the plan for the child's care remain appropriate. In cases where the primary permanency planning goal has not ((yet)) been achieved, the court shall inquire regarding the reasons why the primary goal has not been achieved and determine what needs to be done to make it possible to achieve the primary goal. In all cases, the court shall:

       (a)(i) Order the permanency plan prepared by the agency to be implemented; or

       (ii) Modify the permanency plan, and order implementation of the modified plan; and

       (b)(i) Order the child returned home only if the court finds that a reason for removal as set forth in RCW 13.34.130 no longer exists; or

       (ii) Order the child to remain in out-of-home care for a limited specified time period while efforts are made to implement the permanency plan.

       (7) If the court orders the child returned home, casework supervision shall continue for at least six months, at which time a review hearing shall be held pursuant to ((RCW 13.34.130(7))) section 19 of this act, and the court shall determine the need for continued intervention.

       (8) Continued juvenile court jurisdiction under this chapter shall not be a barrier to the entry of an order establishing a legal guardianship or permanent legal custody when((,)): (a) The court has ordered implementation of a permanency plan that includes legal guardianship or permanent legal custody((,)); and (b) the party pursuing the legal guardianship or permanent legal custody is the party identified in the permanency plan as the prospective legal guardian or custodian. During the pendency of such proceeding, ((juvenile)) the court shall conduct review hearings and further permanency planning hearings as provided in this chapter. At the conclusion of the legal guardianship or permanent legal custody proceeding, a juvenile court hearing shall be held for the purpose of determining whether dependency should be dismissed. If a guardianship or permanent custody order has been entered, the dependency shall be dismissed.

       (9) Following the first permanency planning hearing, the court shall hold a further permanency planning hearing in accordance with this section at least once every twelve months until a permanency planning goal is achieved or the dependency is dismissed, whichever occurs first.

       (10) Except as ((otherwise)) provided in RCW 13.34.235, the status of all dependent children shall continue to be reviewed by the court at least once every six months, in accordance with ((RCW 13.34.130(7))) section 19 of this act, until the dependency is dismissed. Prior to the second permanency planning hearing, the agency that has custody of the child shall consider whether to file a petition for termination of parental rights.

       (11) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to limit the ability of the agency that has custody of the child to file a petition for termination of parental rights or a guardianship petition at any time following the establishment of dependency. Upon the filing of such a petition, a fact-finding hearing shall be scheduled and held in accordance with this chapter unless the agency requests dismissal of the petition prior to the hearing or unless the parties enter an agreed order terminating parental rights, establishing guardianship, or otherwise resolving the matter.

       (12) The approval of a permanency plan that does not contemplate return of the child to the parent does not relieve the supervising agency of its obligation to provide reasonable services, under this chapter, intended to effectuate the return of the child to the parent, including but not limited to, visitation rights.

       (13) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to limit the procedural due process rights of any party in a termination or guardianship proceeding filed under this chapter.

       Sec. 21. RCW 13.34.165 and 1998 c 296 s 38 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) Failure by a party to comply with an order entered under this chapter is civil contempt of court as provided in RCW 7.21.030(2)(e).

       (2) The maximum term of ((imprisonment)) confinement that may be imposed as a remedial sanction for contempt of court under this section is confinement for up to seven days.

       (3) A child ((imprisoned)) held for contempt under this section shall be confined only in a secure juvenile detention facility operated by or pursuant to a contract with a county.

       (4) A motion for contempt may be made by a parent, juvenile court personnel, or by any public agency, organization, or person having custody of the child under a court order entered pursuant to this chapter.

       (5) Whenever the court finds probable cause to believe, based upon consideration of a motion for contempt and the information set forth in a supporting declaration, that a child has violated a placement order entered under this chapter, the court may issue an order directing law enforcement to pick up and take the child to detention. The order may be entered ex parte without prior notice to the child or other parties. Following the child's admission to detention, a detention review hearing must be held in accordance with RCW 13.32A.065.

       Sec. 22. RCW 13.34.170 and 1981 c 195 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:

       In any case in which ((an order or decree of)) the ((juvenile)) court ((requiring)) has ordered a parent or parents, guardian, or other person having custody of a child to pay ((for shelter care and/or)) support ((of such child is)) under RCW 13.34.160 and the order has not been complied with, the court may, upon such person or persons being duly summoned or voluntarily appearing, proceed to inquire into the amount due upon ((said)) the order ((or decree)) and enter judgment for ((such)) that amount against the defaulting party or parties, and ((such)) the judgment shall be docketed as are other judgments for the payment of money.

       In such judgments, the county in which the ((same are)) order is entered shall be ((denominated)) the judgment creditor, or the state may be the judgment creditor where the child is in the custody of a state agency ((and said)). Judgments may be enforced by the prosecuting attorney of ((such)) the county, or the attorney general where the state is the judgment creditor and any moneys recovered ((thereon)) shall be paid into the registry of the juvenile court and shall be disbursed to such person, persons, agency, or governmental department as the court ((shall find to be)) finds is entitled ((thereto)) to it.

       Such judgments shall remain ((as)) valid and enforceable ((judgments)) for a period of ten years ((subsequent to the)) after the date of entry ((thereof)).

       Sec. 23. RCW 13.34.174 and 1993 c 412 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) The provisions of this section shall apply when a court orders a party to undergo an alcohol or substance abuse diagnostic investigation and evaluation.

       (2) The facility conducting the investigation and evaluation shall make a written report to the court stating its findings and recommendations including family-based services or treatment when appropriate. If its findings and recommendations support treatment, it shall also recommend a treatment plan setting out:

       (a) Type of treatment;

       (b) Nature of treatment;

       (c) Length of treatment;

       (d) A treatment time schedule; and

       (e) Approximate cost of the treatment.

       The affected person shall be included in developing the appropriate ((plan of)) treatment plan. The ((plan of)) treatment plan must be signed by (([the])) the treatment provider and the affected person. The initial written progress report based on the treatment plan ((and response to treatment)) shall be sent to the appropriate persons six weeks after initiation of treatment((, and)). Subsequent progress reports shall be provided after three months, ((after)) six months, ((after)) twelve months, and thereafter every six months if treatment exceeds twelve months. Reports are to be filed with the court in a timely manner. Close-out of the treatment record must include summary of pretreatment and posttreatment, with final outcome and disposition. The report shall also include recommendations for ongoing stability and decrease in destructive behavior.

       ((The)) Each report ((with the treatment plan)) shall also be filed with the court and a copy given to the person evaluated and the person's counsel. A copy of the treatment plan shall also be given to the department's caseworker and to the guardian ad litem. Any program for chemical dependency shall meet the program requirements contained in chapter 70.96A RCW.

       (3) If the court has ordered treatment pursuant to a dependency proceeding it shall also require the treatment program to provide, in the reports required by subsection (2) of this section, status reports to the court, the department, the supervising child-placing agency if any, and the person or person's counsel regarding((: (a))) the person's cooperation with the treatment plan proposed((;)) and (((b))) the person's progress in treatment.

       (4) ((In addition,)) If ((the party)) a person subject to this section fails or neglects to carry out and fulfill any term or condition of the treatment plan, the program or agency administering the treatment shall report such breach to the court, the department, the guardian ad litem, the supervising child-placing agency if any, and the person or person's counsel, within twenty-four hours, together with its recommendation. These reports shall be made as a declaration by the person who is personally responsible for providing the treatment.

       (5) Nothing in this chapter may be construed as allowing the court to require the department to pay for the cost of any alcohol or substance abuse evaluation or treatment program.

       Sec. 24. RCW 13.34.176 and 1993 c 412 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) The court ((or the department)), upon receiving a report under RCW 13.34.174(4) or at the department's request, may schedule a show cause hearing to determine whether the person is in violation of the treatment conditions. All parties shall be given notice of the hearing. The court shall hold the hearing within ten days of the request for a hearing. At the hearing, testimony, declarations, reports, or other relevant information may be presented on the person's alleged failure to comply with the treatment plan and the person shall have the right to present similar information on his or her own behalf.

       (2) If the court finds that there has been a violation of the treatment conditions it shall modify the dependency order, as necessary, to ensure the safety of the child. The modified order shall remain in effect until the party is in full compliance with the treatment requirements.

       Sec. 25. RCW 13.34.180 and 1998 c 314 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) A petition seeking termination of a parent and child relationship may be filed in juvenile court by any party to the dependency proceedings concerning that child. Such petition shall conform to the requirements of RCW 13.34.040, shall be served upon the parties as provided in RCW 13.34.070(8), and shall allege all of the following unless subsection (2) or (3) of this section applies:

       (((1))) (a) That the child has been found to be a dependent child ((under RCW 13.34.030(4))); ((and

       (2))) (b) That the court has entered a dispositional order pursuant to RCW 13.34.130; ((and

       (3))) (c) That the child has been removed or will, at the time of the hearing, have been removed from the custody of the parent for a period of at least six months pursuant to a finding of dependency ((under RCW 13.34.030(4))); ((and

       (4))) (d) That the services ordered under ((RCW 13.34.130)) section 18 of this act have been expressly and understandably offered or provided and all necessary services, reasonably available, capable of correcting the parental deficiencies within the foreseeable future have been expressly and understandably offered or provided; ((and

       (5))) (e) That there is little likelihood that conditions will be remedied so that the child can be returned to the parent in the near future. A parent's failure to substantially improve parental deficiencies within twelve months following entry of the dispositional order shall give rise to a rebuttable presumption that there is little likelihood that conditions will be remedied so that the child can be returned to the parent in the near future. The presumption shall not arise unless the petitioner makes a showing that all necessary services reasonably capable of correcting the parental deficiencies within the foreseeable future have been clearly offered or provided. In determining whether the conditions will be remedied the court may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors:

       (((a))) (i) Use of intoxicating or controlled substances so as to render the parent incapable of providing proper care for the child for extended periods of time and documented unwillingness of the parent to receive and complete treatment or documented multiple failed treatment attempts; or

       (((b))) (ii) Psychological incapacity or mental deficiency of the parent that is so severe and chronic as to render the parent incapable of providing proper care for the child for extended periods of time, and documented unwillingness of the parent to receive and complete treatment or documentation that there is no treatment that can render the parent capable of providing proper care for the child in the near future; and

       (((6))) (f) That continuation of the parent and child relationship clearly diminishes the child's prospects for early integration into a stable and permanent home((; or)).

       (((7))) (2) In lieu of the allegations in subsection((s)) (1) ((through (6))) of this section, the petition may allege that the child was found under such circumstances that the whereabouts of the child's parent are unknown and no person has acknowledged paternity or maternity and requested custody of the child within two months after the child was found((; or)).

       (((8))) (3) In lieu of the allegations in subsection((s (2) through (6))) (1)(b) through (f) of this section, the petition may allege that the parent has been ((found by a court of competent jurisdiction)) convicted of:

       (a) ((To have committed, against another child of such parent,)) Murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree, or homicide by abuse as defined in chapter 9A.32 RCW against another child of the parent;

       (b) ((To have committed, against another child of such parent,)) Manslaughter in the first degree or manslaughter in the second degree, as defined in chapter 9A.32 RCW against another child of the parent;

       (c) ((To have attempted, conspired, or solicited)) Attempting, conspiring, or soliciting another to commit one or more of the crimes listed in (a) or (b) of this subsection; or

       (d) ((To have committed)) Assault in the first or second degree, as defined in chapter 9A.36 RCW, against the surviving child or another child of the parent.

       (4) Notice of rights shall be served upon the parent, guardian, or legal custodian with the petition and shall be in substantially the following form:

 

"NOTICE

 

A petition for termination of parental rights has been filed against you. You have important legal rights and you must take steps to protect your interests. This petition could result in permanent loss of your parental rights.

1. You have the right to a fact-finding hearing before a judge.

2. You have the right to have a lawyer represent you at the hearing. A lawyer can look at the files in your case, talk to the department of social and health services and other agencies, tell you about the law, help you understand your rights, and help you at hearings. If you cannot afford a lawyer, the court will appoint one to represent you. To get a court-appointed lawyer you must contact:    (explain local procedure)   .

3. At the hearing, you have the right to speak on your own behalf, to introduce evidence, to examine witnesses, and to receive a decision based solely on the evidence presented to the judge.

You should be present at this hearing.

You may call    (insert agency)    for more information about your child. The agency's name and telephone number are    (insert name and telephone number)   ."

       Sec. 26. RCW 13.34.190 and 1998 c 314 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

       After hearings pursuant to RCW 13.34.110 or 13.34.130, the court may enter an order terminating all parental rights to a child only if the court finds that:

       (1)(a) The allegations contained in the petition as provided in RCW 13.34.180(1) ((through (6))) are established by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence; or

       (b) ((RCW 13.34.180 (3) and (4) may be waived because the allegations under)) The provisions of RCW 13.34.180 (1)((, (2), (5), and (6))) (a), (b), (e), and (f) are established beyond a reasonable doubt and if so, then RCW 13.34.180(1) (c) and (d) may be waived. When an infant has been abandoned, as defined in RCW 13.34.030, and the abandonment has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then RCW 13.34.180(1) (c) and (d) may be waived; or

       (c) The allegation under RCW 13.34.180(((7))) (2) is established beyond a reasonable doubt. In determining whether RCW 13.34.180 (((5) and (6))) (1) (e) and (f) are established beyond a reasonable doubt, the court shall consider whether one or more of the aggravated circumstances listed in ((RCW 13.34.130(2))) section 16 of this act exist; or

       (d) The allegation under RCW 13.34.180(((8))) (3) is established beyond a reasonable doubt; and

       (2) Such an order is in the best interests of the child.

       Sec. 27. RCW 13.34.200 and 1977 ex.s. c 291 s 48 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) Upon the termination of parental rights pursuant to RCW 13.34.180, all rights, powers, privileges, immunities, duties, and obligations, including any rights to custody, control, visitation, or support existing between the child and parent shall be severed and terminated and the parent shall have no standing to appear at any further legal proceedings concerning the child: PROVIDED, That any support obligation existing prior to the effective date of the order terminating parental rights shall not be severed or terminated. The rights of one parent may be terminated without affecting the rights of the other parent and the order shall so state.

       (2) An order terminating the parent and child relationship shall not disentitle a child to any benefit due the child from any third person, agency, state, or the United States, nor shall any action under this chapter be deemed to affect any rights and benefits that ((a native American)) an Indian child derives from the child's descent from a member of a federally recognized Indian tribe.

       Sec. 28. RCW 13.34.210 and 1991 c 127 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

       If, upon entering an order terminating the parental rights of a parent, there remains no parent having parental rights, the court shall commit the child to the custody of the department ((of social and health services)) or to a licensed child-placing agency willing to accept custody for the purpose of placing the child for adoption((, or in the absence thereof)). If an adoptive home has not been identified, the department or agency shall place the child in a licensed foster home, or take other suitable measures for the care and welfare of the child. The custodian shall have authority to consent to the adoption of the child consistent with chapter 26.33 RCW, the marriage of the child, the enlistment of the child in the armed forces of the United States, necessary surgical and other medical treatment for the child, and to consent to such other matters as might normally be required of the parent of the child.

       If a child has not been adopted within six months after the date of the order and a ((general guardian)) guardianship of the child under RCW 13.34.231 or chapter 11.88 RCW, or a permanent custody order under chapter 26.10 RCW, has not been ((appointed)) entered by the court, ((the child shall be returned to the court for entry of further orders for his or her care, custody, and control, and, except for children whose cases are reviewed by a citizen review board under chapter 13.70 RCW,)) the court shall review the case every six months ((thereafter)) until a decree of adoption is entered except for those cases which are reviewed by a citizen review board under chapter 13.70 RCW.

       Sec. 29. RCW 13.34.231 and 1994 c 288 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

       At the hearing on a dependency guardianship petition, all parties have the right to present evidence and cross examine witnesses. The rules of evidence apply to the conduct of the hearing. A guardianship shall be established if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that:

       (1) The child has been found to be a dependent child under RCW 13.34.030;

       (2) A dispositional order has been entered pursuant to RCW 13.34.130;

       (3) The child has been removed or will, at the time of the hearing, have been removed from the custody of the parent for a period of at least six months pursuant to a finding of dependency under RCW 13.34.030;

       (4) The services ordered under RCW 13.34.130 and section 18 of this act have been offered or provided and all necessary services, reasonably available, capable of correcting the parental deficiencies within the foreseeable future have been offered or provided;

       (5) There is little likelihood that conditions will be remedied so that the child can be returned to the parent in the near future; and

       (6) A guardianship, rather than termination of the parent-child relationship or continuation of efforts to return the child to the custody of the parent, would be in the best interest of the child.

       Sec. 30. RCW 13.34.233 and 1995 c 311 s 24 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) Any party may request the court under RCW 13.34.150 to modify or terminate a dependency guardianship order ((under RCW 13.34.150)). Notice of any motion to modify or terminate the guardianship shall be served on all other parties, including any agency that was responsible for supervising the child's placement at the time the guardianship petition was filed. Notice ((shall)) in all cases shall be served upon the department ((of social and health services)). If the department was not previously a party to the guardianship proceeding, the department shall nevertheless have the right to: (a) Initiate a proceeding to modify or terminate a guardianship; and ((the right to)) (b) intervene at any stage of such a proceeding.

       (2) The guardianship may be modified or terminated upon the motion of any party or the department if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there has been a substantial change of circumstances subsequent to the establishment of the guardianship and that it is in the child's best interest to modify or terminate the guardianship. The court shall hold a hearing on the motion before modifying or terminating a guardianship.

       (3) Upon entry of an order terminating the guardianship, the dependency guardian shall not have any rights or responsibilities with respect to the child and shall not have legal standing to participate as a party in further dependency proceedings pertaining to the child. The court may allow the child's dependency guardian to attend dependency review proceedings pertaining to the child for the sole purpose of providing information about the child to the court.

       (4) Upon entry of an order terminating the guardianship, the child shall remain dependent and the court shall either return the child to the child's parent or order the child into the custody, control, and care of the department ((of social and health services)) or a licensed child-placing agency for placement in a foster home or group care facility licensed pursuant to chapter 74.15 RCW or in a home not required to be licensed pursuant to such chapter. The court shall not place a child in the custody of the child's parent unless the court finds that ((a)) reasons for removal as set forth in RCW 13.34.130 no longer exist((s)) and that such placement is in the child's best interest. The court shall thereafter conduct reviews as provided in ((RCW 13.34.130(5))) section 19 of this act and, where applicable, shall hold a permanency planning hearing in accordance with RCW 13.34.145.

       Sec. 31. RCW 13.34.235 and 1981 c 195 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:

       A dependency guardianship ((established under RCW 13.34.231 and 13.34.232)) is not subject to the review hearing requirements of ((RCW 13.34.130)) section 19 of this act unless ordered by the court under RCW 13.34.232(1)(e).

       Sec. 32. RCW 13.34.260 and 1990 c 284 s 25 are each amended to read as follows:

       In an attempt to minimize the inherent intrusion in the lives of families involved in the foster care system and to maintain parental authority where appropriate, the department, absent good cause, shall follow the wishes of the natural parent regarding the placement of the child. Preferences such as family constellation, ethnicity, and religion shall be ((given consideration)) considered when matching children to foster homes. Parental authority is appropriate in areas that are not connected with the abuse or neglect that resulted in the dependency and ((should)) shall be integrated through the foster care team. For purposes of this section, "foster care team" means the foster parent currently providing care, the currently assigned social worker, and the parent or parents.

       Sec. 33. RCW 13.34.270 and 1998 c 229 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) Whenever the department ((of social and health services)) places a ((developmentally disabled)) child with a developmental disability in out-of-home care pursuant to RCW 74.13.350, the department shall obtain a judicial determination within one hundred eighty days of the placement that continued placement is in the best interests of the child. If the child's out-of-home placement ends before one hundred eighty days have elapsed, no judicial determination is required.

       (2) To obtain the judicial determination, the department shall file a petition alleging that there is located or residing within the county a child who has a developmental disability((, as defined in RCW 71A.10.020,)) and that the child has been placed in out-of-home care pursuant to RCW 74.13.350. The petition shall request that the court review the child's placement, make a determination ((that)) whether continued placement is in the best interests of the child, and take other necessary action as provided in this section. The petition shall contain the name, date of birth, and residence of the child and the names and residences of the child's parent or legal guardian who has agreed to the child's placement in out-of-home care. Reasonable attempts shall be made by the department to ascertain and set forth in the petition the identity, location, and custodial status of any parent who is not a party to the placement agreement and why that parent cannot assume custody of the child.

       (3) Upon filing of the petition, the clerk of the court shall schedule the petition for a hearing to be held no later than fourteen calendar days after the petition has been filed. The department shall provide notification of the time, date, and purpose of the hearing to the parent or legal guardian who has agreed to the child's placement in out-of-home care. The department shall also make reasonable attempts to notify any parent who is not a party to the placement agreement, if the parent's identity and location is known. Notification under this section may be given by the most expedient means, including but not limited to, mail, personal service, and telephone((, and telegraph)).

       (4) The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem for the child as provided in RCW 13.34.100, unless the court for good cause finds the appointment unnecessary.

       (5) Permanency planning hearings shall be held as provided in this ((subsection)) section. At the hearing, the court shall review whether the child's best interests are served by continued out-of-home placement and determine the future legal status of the child.

       (a) For children age ten and under, a permanency planning hearing shall be held in all cases where the child has remained in out-of-home care for at least nine months and an adoption decree or guardianship order under chapter 11.88 RCW has not previously been entered. The hearing shall take place no later than twelve months following commencement of the child's current placement episode.

       (b) For children over age ten, a permanency planning hearing shall be held in all cases where the child has remained in out-of-home care for at least fifteen months and an adoption decree or guardianship order under chapter 11.88 RCW has not previously been entered. The hearing shall take place no later than eighteen months following commencement of the current placement episode.

       (c) No later than ten working days before the permanency planning hearing, the department shall submit a written permanency plan to the court and shall mail a copy of the plan to all parties. The plan shall be directed toward securing a safe, stable, and permanent home for the child as soon as possible. The plan shall identify one of the following outcomes as the primary goal and may also identify additional outcomes as alternative goals: Return of the child to the home of the child's parent or legal guardian; adoption; guardianship; or long-term out-of-home care, until the child is age eighteen, with a written agreement between the parties and the child's care provider.

       (d) If a goal of long-term out-of-home care has been achieved before the permanency planning hearing, the court shall review the child's status to determine whether the placement and the plan for the child's care remains appropriate. In cases where the primary permanency planning goal has not been achieved, the court shall inquire regarding the reasons why the primary goal has not been achieved and determine what needs to be done to make it possible to achieve the primary goal.

       (e) Following the first permanency planning hearing, the court shall hold a further permanency planning hearing in accordance with this section at least once every twelve months until a permanency planning goal is achieved or the voluntary placement agreement is terminated.

       (6) Any party to the voluntary placement agreement may terminate the agreement at any time. Upon termination of the agreement, the child shall be returned to the care of the child's parent or legal guardian, unless the child has been taken into custody pursuant to RCW 13.34.050 or 26.44.050, placed in shelter care pursuant to RCW 13.34.060, or placed in foster care pursuant to RCW 13.34.130. The department shall notify the court upon termination of the voluntary placement agreement and return of the child to the care of the child's parent or legal guardian. Whenever a voluntary placement agreement is terminated, an action under this section shall be dismissed.

       (7) This section does not prevent the department from filing a dependency petition if there is reason to believe that the child is a dependent child as defined in RCW 13.34.030. An action filed under this section shall be dismissed upon the filing of a dependency petition regarding a child who is the subject of the action under this section.

       Sec. 34. RCW 13.34.300 and 1979 ex.s. c 201 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

       The legislature finds that it is the responsibility of the custodial parent, parents or guardian to ensure that children within the custody of such individuals attend school as provided for by law. To this end, while a parent's failure to cause a juvenile to attend school should not alone provide a basis for a neglect petition against the parent or guardian, when a neglect petition is filed on the basis of other evidence, a parent or guardian's failure to take reasonable steps to ensure that the juvenile attends school may be ((used as evidence with respect)) relevant to the question of the appropriate disposition of a neglect petition.

       Sec. 35. RCW 13.34.340 and 1999 c 188 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

       For minors who cannot consent to the release of their records with the department because they are not old enough to consent to treatment, or, if old enough, lack the capacity to consent, or if the minor is receiving treatment involuntarily with a provider the department has authorized to provide mental health treatment under RCW 13.34.320, the department shall disclose, upon the treating physician's request, all relevant records, including the minor's passport as established under RCW 74.13.285, in the department's possession that the treating physician determines contain information required for treatment of the minor. The treating physician shall maintain all records received from the department in a manner that distinguishes the records from any other records in the minor's file with the treating physician and the department records may not be disclosed by the treating physician to any other person or entity absent a court order except that, for medical purposes only, a treating physician may disclose the department records to another treating physician.

       Sec. 36. RCW 13.70.003 and 1989 1st ex.s. c 17 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

       The legislature recognizes the importance of permanency and continuity to children and of fairness to parents in the provision of child welfare services.

       The legislature intends to create a citizen review board system that will function in an advisory capacity to the judiciary, the department, and the legislature. The purpose of the citizen review board system is to:

       (1) Provide periodic review of cases involving substitute care of children in a manner that complies with case review requirements and time lines imposed by federal laws pertaining to child welfare services;

       (2) Improve the quality of case review provided to children in substitute care and their families; and

       (3) Provide a means for community involvement in monitoring cases of children in substitute care.

       In order to accomplish the foregoing purposes, the citizen review board system shall not be subject to the procedures and standards usually applicable to judicial and administrative hearings, except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter and ((RCW 13.34.130)) section 19 of this act, 13.34.145, and 26.44.115. Nothing in this chapter and ((RCW 13.34.130)) section 19 of this act, 13.34.145, and 26.44.115 shall limit the ability of the department to utilize court review hearings and administrative reviews to meet the periodic review requirements imposed by federal law.

       Sec. 37. RCW 13.70.110 and 1991 c 127 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) This section shall apply to cases where a child has been placed in substitute care pursuant to a proceeding under chapter 13.34 RCW.

       (2) Within forty-five days following commencement of the placement episode, the court shall assign the child's case to a board and forward to the board a copy of the dependency petition and any shelter care or dependency disposition orders which have been entered in the case by the court.

       (3) The board shall review the case plan for each child whose case is assigned to the board by the court. The review shall take place at times set by the board. The first review shall occur within ninety days following commencement of the placement episode. The second review shall occur within six months following commencement of the placement episode. The next review shall occur within one year after commencement of the placement episode. Within ((eighteen)) twelve months following commencement of the placement episode, a permanency planning hearing shall be held before the court in accordance with RCW 13.34.145. Thereafter, the court shall assign the child's case for a board review or a court review hearing pursuant to ((RCW 13.34.130(5))) section 17 of this act. A board review or a court review hearing shall take place at least once every six months until the child is no longer within the jurisdiction of the court or no longer in substitute care or until a guardianship order or adoption decree is entered. After the permanency planning hearing, a court review hearing must occur at least once a year as provided in ((RCW 13.34.130)) section 19 of this act. The board shall review any case where a petition to terminate parental rights has been denied, and such review shall occur as soon as practical but no later than forty-five days after the denial.

       (4) The board shall prepare written findings and recommendations with respect to:

       (a) Whether reasonable efforts were made before the placement to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the home, including whether consideration was given to removing the alleged offender, rather than the child, from the home;

       (b) Whether reasonable efforts have been made subsequent to the placement to make it possible for the child to be returned home;

       (c) Whether the child has been placed in the least-restrictive setting appropriate to the child's needs, including whether consideration has been given to placement with the child's relatives;

       (d) Whether there is a continuing need for placement and whether the placement is appropriate;

       (e) Whether there has been compliance with the case plan;

       (f) Whether progress has been made toward alleviating the need for placement;

       (g) A likely date by which the child may be returned home or other permanent plan of care may be implemented; and

       (h) Other problems, solutions, or alternatives the board determines should be explored.

       (5) Within ten working days following the review, the board shall send a copy of its findings and recommendations to the parents and their attorneys, the child's custodians and their attorneys, mature children and their attorneys, other attorneys or guardians ad litem appointed by the court to represent children, the department and other child placement agencies directly responsible for supervising the child's placement, and any prosecuting attorney or attorney general actively involved in the case. If the child is an Indian as defined in the Indian child welfare act, 25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq., a copy of the board's findings and recommendations shall also be sent to the child's Indian tribe.

       (6) If the department is unable or unwilling to implement the board recommendations, the department shall submit to the board, within ten working days after receipt of the findings and recommendations, an implementation report setting forth the reasons why the department is unable or unwilling to implement the board's recommendations. The report will also set forth the case plan which the department intends to implement.

       (7) Within forty-five days following the review, the board shall either:

       (a) Schedule the case for further review by the board; or

       (b) Submit to the court the board's findings and recommendations and the department's implementation reports, if any. If the board's recommendations are different from the existing court-ordered case plan, the board shall also file with the court a motion for a review hearing.

       (8) Within ten days of receipt of the board's written findings and recommendations and the department's implementation report, if any, the court shall review the findings and recommendations and implementation reports, if any. The court may on its own motion schedule a review hearing.

       (9) Unless modified by subsequent court order, the court-ordered case plan and court orders that are in effect at the time that a board reviews a case shall remain in full force and effect. Board findings and recommendations are advisory only and do not in any way modify existing court orders or court-ordered case plans.

       (10) The findings and recommendations of the board and the department's implementation report, if any, shall become part of the department's case file and the court social file pertaining to the child.

       (11) Nothing in this section shall limit or otherwise modify the rights of any party to a dependency proceeding to request and receive a court review hearing pursuant to the provisions of chapter 13.34 RCW or applicable court rules.

       Sec. 38. RCW 13.70.140 and 1993 c 505 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

       A permanency planning hearing shall be held before the court in accordance with RCW 13.34.145. Thereafter, court review hearings shall occur at least once every six months, under ((RCW 13.34.130(5))) section 19 of this act, until the child is no longer within the jurisdiction of the court or the child returns home or a guardianship order or adoption decree is entered. The court may review the case more frequently upon the court's own motion or upon the request of any party to the proceeding.

       Sec. 39. RCW 26.44.115 and 1990 c 246 s 10 are each amended to read as follows:

       If a child is taken into custody by child protective services pursuant to a court order issued under ((RCW 13.34.050)) section 5 of this act, the child protective services worker shall take reasonable steps to advise the parents immediately, regardless of the time of day, that the child has been taken into custody, the reasons why the child was taken into custody, and general information about the child's placement. The department shall comply with RCW 13.34.060 when providing notice under this section.

       Sec. 40. RCW 74.15.030 and 1997 c 386 s 33 are each amended to read as follows:

       The secretary shall have the power and it shall be the secretary's duty:

       (1) In consultation with the children's services advisory committee, and with the advice and assistance of persons representative of the various type agencies to be licensed, to designate categories of facilities for which separate or different requirements shall be developed as may be appropriate whether because of variations in the ages, sex and other characteristics of persons served, variations in the purposes and services offered or size or structure of the agencies to be licensed hereunder, or because of any other factor relevant thereto;

       (2) In consultation with the children's services advisory committee, and with the advice and assistance of persons representative of the various type agencies to be licensed, to adopt and publish minimum requirements for licensing applicable to each of the various categories of agencies to be licensed.

       The minimum requirements shall be limited to:

       (a) The size and suitability of a facility and the plan of operation for carrying out the purpose for which an applicant seeks a license;

       (b) The character, suitability and competence of an agency and other persons associated with an agency directly responsible for the care and treatment of children, expectant mothers or developmentally disabled persons. In consultation with law enforcement personnel, the secretary shall investigate the conviction record or pending charges and dependency record information under chapter 43.43 RCW of each agency and its staff seeking licensure or relicensure. In order to determine the suitability of applicants for an agency license, licensees, their employees, and other persons who have unsupervised access to children in care, and who have not resided in the state of Washington during the three-year period before being authorized to care for children shall be fingerprinted. The fingerprints shall be forwarded to the Washington state patrol and federal bureau of investigation for a criminal history records check. The fingerprint criminal history records checks will be at the expense of the licensee except that in the case of a foster family home, if this expense would work a hardship on the licensee, the department shall pay the expense. The licensee may not pass this cost on to the employee or prospective employee, unless the employee is determined to be unsuitable due to his or her criminal history record. The secretary shall use the information solely for the purpose of determining eligibility for a license and for determining the character, suitability, and competence of those persons or agencies, excluding parents, not required to be licensed who are authorized to care for children, expectant mothers, and developmentally disabled persons. Criminal justice agencies shall provide the secretary such information as they may have and that the secretary may require for such purpose;

       (c) The number of qualified persons required to render the type of care and treatment for which an agency seeks a license;

       (d) The safety, cleanliness, and general adequacy of the premises to provide for the comfort, care and well-being of children, expectant mothers or developmentally disabled persons;

       (e) The provision of necessary care, including food, clothing, supervision and discipline; physical, mental and social well-being; and educational, recreational and spiritual opportunities for those served;

       (f) The financial ability of an agency to comply with minimum requirements established pursuant to chapter 74.15 RCW and RCW 74.13.031; and

       (g) The maintenance of records pertaining to the admission, progress, health and discharge of persons served;

       (3) To investigate any person, including relatives by blood or marriage except for parents, for character, suitability, and competence in the care and treatment of children, expectant mothers, and developmentally disabled persons prior to authorizing that person to care for children, expectant mothers, and developmentally disabled persons. However, if a child is placed with a relative under ((RCW 13.34.060)) section 7 of this act or RCW 13.34.130, and if such relative appears otherwise suitable and competent to provide care and treatment the criminal history background check required by this section need not be completed before placement, but shall be completed as soon as possible after placement;

       (4) On reports of alleged child abuse and neglect, to investigate agencies in accordance with chapter 26.44 RCW, including child day-care centers and family day-care homes, to determine whether the alleged abuse or neglect has occurred, and whether child protective services or referral to a law enforcement agency is appropriate;

       (5) To issue, revoke, or deny licenses to agencies pursuant to chapter 74.15 RCW and RCW 74.13.031. Licenses shall specify the category of care which an agency is authorized to render and the ages, sex and number of persons to be served;

       (6) To prescribe the procedures and the form and contents of reports necessary for the administration of chapter 74.15 RCW and RCW 74.13.031 and to require regular reports from each licensee;

       (7) To inspect agencies periodically to determine whether or not there is compliance with chapter 74.15 RCW and RCW 74.13.031 and the requirements adopted hereunder;

       (8) To review requirements adopted hereunder at least every two years and to adopt appropriate changes after consultation with the child care coordinating committee and other affected groups for child day-care requirements and with the children's services advisory committee for requirements for other agencies; and

       (9) To consult with public and private agencies in order to help them improve their methods and facilities for the care of children, expectant mothers and developmentally disabled persons.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 41. RCW 13.34.170 shall be recodified to appear immediately following RCW 13.34.160.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 42. The following acts or parts of acts are each repealed:

       (1) RCW 13.34.162 (Child support schedule) and 1993 c 412 s 10 and 1988 c 275 s 15; and

       (2) RCW 13.34.220 (Order terminating parent and child relationship--Prevailing party to present findings, etc., to court, when) and 1979 c 155 s 50."

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, the following title amendment was adopted:

 

 

      On page 1, line 2 of the title, after "statutes;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 13.34.030, 13.34.040, 13.34.050, 13.34.060, 13.34.070, 13.34.080, 13.34.120, 13.34.145, 13.34.165, 13.34.170, 13.34.174, 13.34.176, 13.34.180, 13.34.190, 13.34.200, 13.34.210, 13.34.231, 13.34.233, 13.34.235, 13.34.260, 13.34.270, 13.34.300, 13.34.340, 13.70.003, 13.70.110, 13.70.140, 26.44.115, and 74.15.030; reenacting and amending RCW 13.34.090, 13.34.110, and 13.34.130; adding new sections to chapter 13.34 RCW; recodifying RCW 13.34.170; and repealing RCW 13.34.162 and 13.34.220."

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6217 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6217.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6217 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Absent: Senator Finkbeiner - 1.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6217, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Franklin, Senator Thibaudeau was excused.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6182, by Senators McCaslin and Costa

 

Specifying the effect that changes in law will have on sentencing provisions.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Heavey, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6182 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6182 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Heavey, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6182 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6182.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6182 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Excused: Senators Sellar and Thibaudeau - 2.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6182, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6234, by Senators Patterson, Haugen, Eide, Costa, Kohl-Welles, Gardner and McAuliffe

 

Specifying conditions for requiring examination of a driver.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, the following amendment by Senators Hargrove and Patterson was adopted:

       On page 1, line 12, strike ", but not limited to,"

      On motion of Senator Goings, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6234 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6234.

 

 

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6234 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Excused: Senators Sellar and Thibaudeau - 2.

      ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 6234, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Honeyford, Senator McCaslin was excused.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6667, by Senators Haugen, Swecker, Gardner, Morton, Sellar, Sheahan, Benton and Winsley

 

Exempting certain commercial vehicles from replacing license plates.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Goings, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6667 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6667.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6667 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 45; Nays, 1; Absent, 0; Excused, 3.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 45.

     Voting nay: Senator Honeyford - 1.

     Excused: Senators McCaslin, Sellar and Thibaudeau - 3.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6667, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6773, by Senators Haugen and Bauer

 

Adjusting day labor allowances for county road construction.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Snyder, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6773 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6773 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Morton, the following striking amendment by Senators Morton, Haugen and Snyder was adopted:

       Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

       "Sec. 1. RCW 36.77.065 and 1980 c 40 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

       The board may cause any county road to be constructed or improved by day labor as provided in this section.

       (1) As used in this section, "county road construction budget" means the aggregate total of those costs as defined by the budgeting, accounting, and reporting system for counties and cities and other local governments authorized under RCW 43.09.200 and 43.09.230 as prescribed in the state auditor's budget, accounting, and reporting manual's (BARS) road and street construction accounts 541.00 through 541.90 in effect April 1, 1975: PROVIDED, That such costs shall not include those costs assigned to the preliminary engineering account 541.11, right of way accounts 541.20 through 541.25, ancillary operations account 541.80, and ferries account 541.81 in the budget, accounting, and reporting manual.

       (2) For counties with a population density that equals or exceeds one hundred persons per square mile, except for those counties composed entirely of islands, the total amount of day labor construction programs one county may perform annually shall total no more than the amounts determined in the following manner:

       (a) Any county with a total annual county road construction budget of four million dollars or more may accumulate a day labor road construction budget equal to no more than eight hundred thousand dollars or fifteen percent of the county's total annual county road construction budget, whichever is greater.

       (b) Any county with a total annual county road construction budget ((over)) of one million five hundred thousand dollars or more and less than four million dollars may accumulate a day labor road construction budget equal to not more than five hundred twenty-five thousand dollars or twenty percent of the county's total annual county road construction budget, whichever is greater.

       (c) Any county with a total annual county road construction budget ((over)) of five hundred thousand dollars or more and less than one million five hundred thousand dollars may accumulate a day labor road construction budget equal to two hundred fifty thousand dollars or thirty-five percent of the county's total annual county road construction budget, whichever is greater.

       (d) Any county with a total annual county road construction budget less than five hundred thousand dollars may accumulate a day labor road construction budget equal to two hundred fifty thousand dollars: PROVIDED, That any county with a total annual road construction budget of less than five hundred thousand dollars may, by resolution of the board at the time the county road construction budget is adopted, elect to construct or improve county roads by day labor in an amount not to exceed thirty-five thousand dollars on any one project, including labor, equipment, and materials; such election to be in lieu of the two hundred fifty thousand dollar limit provided for in this section, except that any project means a complete project and the division of any project into units of work or classes of work so as to permit construction by day labor is not authorized.

       (3) For counties with a population density of less than one hundred persons per square mile and those counties composed entirely of islands, the total amount of day labor construction programs one county may perform annually shall total no more than the amounts determined in the following manner:

       (a) Any county with a total annual county road construction budget of four million dollars or more may accumulate a day labor road construction budget equal to not more than eight hundred eighty thousand dollars or twenty-five percent of the county's total annual county road construction budget, whichever is greater;

       (b) Any county with a total annual county road construction budget of one million five hundred thousand dollars or more and less than four million dollars may accumulate a day labor road construction budget equal to not more than five hundred seventy-seven thousand dollars or thirty percent of the county's total annual county road construction budget, whichever is greater;

       (c) Any county with a total annual county road construction budget of five hundred thousand dollars or more and less than one million five hundred thousand dollars may accumulate a day labor road construction budget equal to two hundred seventy-five thousand dollars or forty-five percent of the county's total annual county road construction budget, whichever is greater;

       (d) Any county with a total annual county road construction budget less than five hundred thousand dollars may accumulate a day labor road construction budget equal to two hundred seventy-five thousand dollars: PROVIDED, That any county with a total annual road construction budget of less than five hundred thousand dollars may, by resolution of the board at the time the county road construction budget is adopted, elect to construct or improve county roads by day labor in an amount not to exceed thirty-eight thousand five hundred dollars on any one project, including labor, equipment, and materials; such election to be in lieu of the two hundred seventy-five thousand dollar limit provided for in this section, except that any project means a complete project and the division of any project into units of work or classes of work so as to permit construction by day labor is not authorized.

       (4) Any county that adopts a county road construction budget unreasonably exceeding that county's actual road construction expenditures for the same budget year which has the effect of permitting the county to exceed the day labor amounts established in this section is in violation of the county road administration board's standards of good practice under RCW 36.78.020 and is in violation of this section. Any county, whose expenditure for day labor for road construction projects unreasonably exceeds the limits specified in this section, is in violation of the county road administration board's standards of good practice under RCW 36.78.020 and is in violation of this section.

       (((3))) (5) Notwithstanding any other provision in this section, whenever the construction work or improvement is the installation of electrical traffic control devices, highway illumination equipment, electrical equipment, wires, or equipment to convey electrical current, in an amount exceeding ten thousand dollars for any one project including labor, equipment, and materials, such work shall be performed by contract as in this chapter provided. This section means a complete project and does not permit the construction of any project by day labor by division of the project into units of work or classes of work."

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Morton, the following title amendment was adopted:

      On page 1, line 1 of the title, after "projects;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "and amending RCW 36.77.065."

      On motion of Senator Snyder, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6773 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6773.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6773 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 45; Nays, 1; Absent, 0; Excused, 3.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, West, Winsley and Zarelli - 45.

     Voting nay: Senator Wojahn - 1.

     Excused: Senators McCaslin, Sellar and Thibaudeau - 3.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6773, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 8025, by Senators Gardner, Spanel and Morton

 

Encouraging the free flow of goods and people across the United States/Canadian border.

 

      The joint memorial was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Gardner, the rules were suspended, Senate Joint Memorial No. 8025 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the joint memorial was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Joint Memorial No. 8025.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Joint Memorial No. 8025 and the joint memorial passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 46; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 46.

     Absent: Senator Gardner - 1.

     Excused: Senators Sellar and Thibaudeau - 2.

      SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 8025, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6683, by Senators Franklin, Kline, Heavey, Thibaudeau and Costa

 

Reporting information on routine traffic enforcement.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Heavey, Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6683 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6683 and the second substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      Senator Heavey moved that the following striking amendment by Senators Franklin and Heavey be adopted:

      Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

       "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 43.43 RCW to read as follows:

       (1) Beginning May 1, 2000, the Washington state patrol shall collect, and report semiannually to the criminal justice training commission, the following information:

       (a) The number of individuals stopped for routine traffic enforcement, whether or not a citation or warning was issued;

       (b) Identifying characteristics of the individual stopped, including the race or ethnicity, approximate age, and gender;

       (c) The nature of the alleged violation that led to the stop;

       (d) Whether a search was instituted as a result of the stop; and

       (e) Whether an arrest was made, or a written citation issued, as a result of either the stop or the search.

       (2) The criminal justice training commission and the Washington state patrol shall compile the information required under subsection (1) of this section and make a report to the legislature no later than December 1, 2000.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 43.43 RCW to read as follows:

       (1) The Washington state patrol shall work with the criminal justice training commission and the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs to develop (a) further criteria for collection and evaluation of the data collected under section 1 of this act, and (b) training materials for use by the state patrol and local law enforcement agencies on the issue of racial profiling.

       (2) The Washington state patrol, criminal justice training commission, and Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs shall encourage local law enforcement agencies to voluntarily collect the data set forth under section 1(1) of this act.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. The Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs shall report to the legislature by December 1, 2000, the following information:

       (1) The names and number of local law enforcement agencies voluntarily collecting data on potential racial profiling;

       (2) The type of data being collected by each participating agency; and

       (3) The manner in which the agencies are using the data collected.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately."

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Haugen moved that the following amendment to the striking amendment by Senators Franklin and Heavey be adopted:

       On page 2, beginning of line 9 of the amendment, strike all of section 4

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senator Haugen on page 2, beginning on line 9, to the striking amendment by Senators Franklin and Heavey.

      The motion by Senator Haugen failed and the amendment to the striking amendment was not adopted.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the striking amendment by Senators Franklin and Heavey to Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6683.

      The motion by Senator Heavey carried and the striking amendment was adopted.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Eide, Senator Haugen was excused.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Heavey, the following title amendment was adopted:

       On page 1, line 2 of the title, after "enforcement;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "adding new sections to chapter 43.43 RCW; creating a new section; and declaring an emergency."

      On motion of Senator Heavey, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6683 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6683.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 6683 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 45; Nays, 2; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 45.

     Voting nay: Senators Johnson and Morton - 2.

     Excused: Senators Haugen and Sellar - 2.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6683, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6212, by Senators T. Sheldon, Haugen and Oke

 

Authorizing private passenger-only ferries.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Goings, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6212 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6212 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      Senator Tim Sheldon moved that the following striking amendment by Senators Tim Sheldon, Oke and Haugen be adopted:

       Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

       "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The operation of passenger-only ferries within the state is a matter of public interest. If the department of transportation discontinues its operations on passenger-only ferry crossings, or decides not to pursue passenger-only ferry crossings that have been previously budgeted and approved by the transportation commission, the public interest requires that persons and entities other than the department be allowed the opportunity to operate passenger-only ferry service on those crossings. The lease of passenger-only ferries and facilities from the department, or provision of money, equipment, or materials, or the provision of equipment, materials, services, or facilities at below-market value by a public entity, to allow an entity to operate passenger-only ferry service is for the benefit of the public to ensure adequate passenger-only ferry service along passenger-only ferry crossings.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. As used in this chapter:

       (1) "Commission" means the Washington utilities and transportation commission.

       (2) "Department" means the Washington department of transportation.

       (3) "Passenger-only ferry" means any vessel operating for the public use for hire over a regular route between fixed termini, excluding:

       (a) Auto ferries;

       (b) Charter service, as defined in RCW 81.84.005;

       (c) Excursion service, as defined in RCW 81.84.005;

       (d) Common carrier ferries, defined as vessels primarily engaged in transporting freight other than vehicles, whose gross earnings from the transportation of passengers are not more than ten percent of the total gross earnings of the vessel;

       (e) Launch service, defined as the transportation of either passengers, or freight, or both, to or from a vessel underway, at anchor, or at a dock; and

       (f) All vessels or services described in RCW 81.84.007.

       (4) "Passenger-only ferry operator" includes, but is not limited to, a nonprofit corporation, public-private partnership, transit agency, municipality, private entity, person, or any combination of them.

       (5) "Public participation" includes the provision of money, equipment, or materials, or the provision of equipment, materials, services, or facilities at below-market value by a public entity.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. (1) All applications to operate passenger-only ferry service upon the waters of this state, including rivers, lakes, and Puget Sound are subject to the provisions of this chapter. Any nonprofit corporation, public-private partnership, transit agency, municipality, private entity, person, or any combination of them, may apply to the commission for a permit to operate passenger-only ferry service.

       (2) Applicants who filed an application under chapter 81.84 RCW before February 1, 2000, will have the first option for a passenger-only ferry permit under this chapter for the ferry crossing applied for in chapter 81.84 RCW.

       (3) The commission may, upon written application, and upon notice and hearing, grant a passenger-only ferry permit to operate service at a passenger-only ferry crossing that was discontinued by the department, or at any other ferry crossing upon the waters of this state, including rivers, lakes, and Puget Sound. The commission shall act on an application for a passenger-only ferry permit within ninety days after the conclusion of the hearing. A passenger-only ferry permit is effective for an initial period of five years. The commission may revoke or cancel the permit on its own motion if the passenger-only ferry permit holder has not initiated service within one year after the commission grants the permit. The commission may renew passenger-only ferry permits for periods of three years, subject to compliance with all rules, and provision of adequate service.

       (4)(a) In deciding whether to grant a passenger-only ferry permit the commission shall consider, at a minimum:

       (i) The applicant's ability to initiate service within one year;

       (ii) The adequacy of service to the community;

       (iii) The effect of the applicant's proposed service on operation of auto ferry service by the department; and

       (iv) The effect of the applicant's proposed service on transportation congestion mitigation.

       (b) When determining whether an applicant can initiate service, the commission shall consider, at a minimum, whether the applicant:

       (i) Has sufficient financial resources, which may include public participation;

       (ii) Has sufficient experience and knowledge of ferry operations;

       (iii) Has made or is making arrangements for parking, docking, vessels, and coordination of ground transportation; and

       (iv) Has identified or met any local government land use or environmental requirements.

       (c) When determining whether an applicant will provide adequate service to the community, the commission shall consider, at a minimum:

       (i) How the proposed service compares to that previously provided by the department along the crossing, if applicable;

       (ii) Whether the applicant has coordinated its service with ground transportation; and

       (iii) The number of runs the applicant proposes to operate.

       (5) The commission may grant only one passenger-only ferry permit for operation at a particular ferry crossing for a given time period.

       (6) The department shall designate an employee with knowledge of ferry operations as a technical advisor to assist the commission in implementing this chapter.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. (1) The department shall immediately notify the commission when it becomes apparent that the department will discontinue one or more passenger-only ferry crossings or that it has decided not to pursue one or more passenger-only ferry crossings that had been previously budgeted and approved by the transportation commission. The commission shall compile a mailing list of interested persons that includes, at a minimum: All certificated commercial ferry operators; all common carrier vessel operators; all affected counties, municipalities, public transportation benefit areas, metropolitan municipal corporations, and regional transit authorities; and all other persons who have notified the commission in writing that they desire to be on the mailing list.

       (2) The commission shall notify all persons on the mailing list that one or more passenger-only ferry crossing routes are eligible under this chapter for issuance of a passenger-only ferry permit. The commission shall accept written petitions from qualified applicants for a period of one hundred twenty days from the date of the notice unless the commission makes a finding that the public interest requires a shorter notice period, in which case the minimum notice period is thirty days from the date of the notice.

       (3) To the extent that the department, before the effective date of this section, has made the decision to discontinue one or more passenger-only ferry crossings or has decided not to pursue one or more passenger-only ferry crossings that had been previously budgeted and approved by the transportation commission, the commission shall compile the mailing list and make notification to interested persons as soon as practicable after that date.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. The commission, in issuing a permit to a passenger-only ferry operator, shall require that liability and property damage insurance be acquired and maintained on each vessel or ferry to be used to provide service, in the amount of not less than one hundred thousand dollars for any recovery for personal injury by one person, and not less than one million dollars and in an additional amount that the commission determines, for all persons receiving personal injury and property damage by reason of one act of negligence, and not less than fifty thousand dollars for damage to property of any person other than the insured; or combined bodily injury and property damage liability insurance of not less than one million dollars. Proof of liability or property damage insurance or surety bond required by this section must be filed with the commission and kept in full force and effect, and failure to do so is cause for cancellation of the operator's permit.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. A passenger-only ferry permit holder may lease passenger-only ferries and facilities from the department as long as the lease of the ferries or facilities does not conflict with the operation of the Washington state ferry system.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. No passenger-only ferry permit granted under this chapter may be sold, assigned, leased, mortgaged, or in any manner transferred, either by the act of the permit holder, or by operation of law, without first obtaining the commission's approval.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. For the purposes of this section only, passenger-only ferry operators are considered to be commercial ferries as defined in chapter 81.84 RCW and shall comply with RCW 81.24.030 requiring annual report filing and payment of regulatory fees and RCW 81.84.040 requiring the payment of application filing fees.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. The commission may adopt rules for operation of passenger-only ferry service, to include rules concerning the process for issuing a passenger-only ferry permit, determining adequacy of service, and establishing fares. The degree and level of regulation may vary with the degree and level of public participation.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. If the department decides to resume service on a passenger-only ferry crossing, the commission shall not renew any existing passenger-only ferry permit for that crossing previously granted by it. During the remainder of the term of the permit, the Washington state ferry system shall not extend similar or competing passenger-only ferry services along that crossing, except upon a proper showing that the passenger-only ferry operator is not providing adequate service. Nothing in this section precludes the Washington state ferry system from entering into an agreement with the passenger-only ferry permit holder, or purchasing or condemning the permit authority or equipment.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. The commission, upon complaint by an interested party, or on its own motion after notice and opportunity for hearing, may cancel, revoke, suspend, alter, or amend a permit issued under this chapter on any of the following grounds:

       (1) Failure of the permit holder to initiate the proposed service within one year after the permit has been granted;

       (2) Violation of any provision of this chapter;

       (3) Violation of or failure to observe the provisions or conditions of the permit or tariff;

       (4) Violation of an order, decision, rule, regulation, or requirement established by the commission under this chapter;

       (5) Failure of a permit holder to maintain the required insurance coverage in full force and effect; or

       (6) Failure or refusal to furnish reasonable and adequate service after initiating service.

       The commission shall take appropriate action within thirty days upon a complaint by an interested party or of its own finding that this section has been violated.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. All applicable provisions of this title relating to procedure, powers of the commission, and penalties apply to the operation and regulation of passenger-only ferry operators under this chapter, except as those provisions may conflict with this chapter and rules adopted under it by the commission.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 13. If any provision of this chapter or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the chapter or application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.

       Sec. 14. RCW 81.84.010 and 1993 c 427 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) Except for certificates to provide commercial ferry service issued before February 1, 2000, all applications for passenger-only ferry service must be filed under section 3 of this act. Except for ferries granted permits under that section, no commercial ferry may hereafter operate any vessel or ferry for the public use for hire between fixed termini or over a regular route upon the waters within this state, including the rivers and lakes and Puget Sound, without first applying for and obtaining from the commission a certificate declaring that public convenience and necessity require such operation. Service authorized by certificates issued before or after July 25, 1993, to a commercial ferry operator shall be exercised by the operator in a manner consistent with the conditions established in the certificate or tariffs: PROVIDED, That no certificate shall be required for a vessel primarily engaged in transporting freight other than vehicles, whose gross earnings from the transportation of passengers and/or vehicles, are not more than ten percent of the total gross annual earnings of such vessel((: PROVIDED, That)).

       (2) Nothing ((herein shall be construed to)) in this chapter affects the right of any county public transportation authority, public transportation benefit area authority, or other public agency within this state to construct, condemn, purchase, operate, or maintain, itself or by contract, agreement, or lease, with any person, firm, or corporation, ferries or boats across or wharfs at or upon the waters within this state, including rivers and lakes and Puget Sound, provided such operation is not over the same route or between the same districts, being served by a certificate holder without first acquiring the rights granted to the certificate holder under the certificate((, nor shall this chapter be construed to affect, amend, or invalidate any contract entered into prior to January 15, 1927, for the operation of ferries or boats upon the waters within this state, which was entered into in good faith by any county with any person, firm, or corporation, except that in case of the operation or maintenance by any county, city, town, port district, or other political subdivision by contract, agreement, or lease with any person, firm, or corporation, of ferries or boats across or wharfs at or upon the waters within this state, including rivers and lakes and Puget Sound, the commission shall have power and authority to regulate rates and services of such operation or maintenance of ferries, boats, or wharfs, to make, fix, alter, or amend said rates, and to regulate service and safety of operations thereof, in the manner and to the same extent as it is empowered to regulate a commercial ferry, notwithstanding the provisions of any act or parts of acts inconsistent herewith)).

       (((2))) (3) The holder of a certificate of public convenience and necessity granted under this chapter must initiate service within five years of obtaining the certificate. The certificate holder shall report to the commission every six months after the certificate is granted on the progress of the certificated route. The reports shall include, but not be limited to, the progress of environmental impact, parking, local government land use, docking, and financing considerations. However, if service has not been initiated within five years of obtaining the certificate, the commission may extend the certificate on a twelve-month basis for up to three years if the six-month progress reports indicate there is significant advancement toward initiating service.

       (((3) The commission shall review certificates in existence as of July 25, 1993, where service is not being provided on all or any portion of the route or routes certificated. Based on progress reports required under subsection (2) of this section, the commission may grant an extension beyond that provided in subsection (2) of this section. Such additional extension may not exceed a total of two years.))

       Sec. 15. RCW 81.84.060 and 1993 c 427 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:

       The commission, upon complaint by an interested party, or upon its own motion after notice and opportunity for hearing, may cancel, revoke, suspend, alter, or amend a certificate issued under this chapter on any of the following grounds:

       (1) Failure of the certificate holder to initiate service by the conclusion of the fifth year after the certificate has been granted or by the conclusion of an extension granted under RCW 81.84.010 (((2) or (3))), if the commission has considered the progress report information required under RCW 81.84.010 (((2) or (3)));

       (2) Failure of the certificate holder to file an annual report;

       (3) The filing by a certificate holder of an annual report that shows no revenue in the previous twelve-month period after service has been initiated;

       (4) The violation of any provision of this chapter;

       (5) The violation of or failure to observe the provisions or conditions of the certificate or tariffs;

       (6) The violation of an order, decision, rule, regulation, or requirement established by the commission under this chapter;

       (7) Failure of a certificate holder to maintain the required insurance coverage in full force and effect; or

       (8) Failure or refusal to furnish reasonable and adequate service after initiating service.

       The commission shall take appropriate action within thirty days upon a complaint by an interested party or of its own finding that a provision of this section has been violated.

       Sec. 16. RCW 47.60.120 and 1993 c 427 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) If the department acquires or constructs, maintains, and operates any ferry crossings upon or toll bridges over Puget Sound or any of its tributary or connecting waters, there shall not be constructed, operated, or maintained any other ferry crossing upon or bridge over any such waters within ten miles of any such crossing or bridge operated or maintained by the department excepting such bridges or ferry crossings in existence, and being operated and maintained under a lawfully issued franchise at the time of the location of the ferry crossing or construction of the toll bridge by the department.

       (2) The ten-mile distance in subsection (1) of this section means ten statute miles measured by airline distance. The ten-mile restriction shall be applied by comparing the two end points (termini) of a state ferry crossing to those of a private ferry crossing.

       (3) The Washington utilities and transportation commission may, upon written petition of a commercial ferry operator certificated or applying for certification under chapter 81.84 RCW, or upon written petition from a passenger-only ferry operator as provided for under section 3 of this act, and upon notice and hearing, grant a waiver from the ten-mile restriction. The waiver must not be detrimental to the public interest. In making a decision to waive the ten-mile restriction, the commission shall consider, but is not limited to, the impact of the waiver on transportation congestion mitigation, air quality improvement, and the overall impact on the Washington state ferry system. The commission shall act upon a request for a waiver within ninety days after the conclusion of the hearing. A waiver is effective for a period of five years from the date of issuance. At the end of five years the waiver becomes permanent unless appealed within thirty days by the commission on its own motion, the department, or an interested party.

       (4) The department shall not maintain and operate any ferry crossing or toll bridge over Puget Sound or any of its tributary or connecting waters that would infringe upon any franchise lawfully issued by the state and in existence and being exercised at the time of the location of the ferry crossing or toll bridge by the department, without first acquiring the rights granted to such franchise holder under the franchise.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 17. A new section is added to chapter 81.104 RCW to read as follows:

       High-capacity transportation systems may operate passenger-only ferry service. This includes responsibility for system implementation. Contracts and agreements to operate passenger-only ferry service may include public-private partnerships, design-build, turnkey, and super turnkey purchasing methods authorized under federal law applicable to joint development projects, such as P.L. 105-178 and 62 Fed. Reg. 12266.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. A new section is added to chapter 81.104 RCW to read as follows:

       RCW 81.104.100 and 81.104.110 do not apply to an assumption of a high-capacity responsibility, route, or plan element by one agency from another, such as the assumption by a local transit agency of the responsibility, route, or plan element of a state transportation agency if the assuming agency undertakes all the obligations of the planning process and the assumption is approved by the appropriate regional planning process.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. (1) The joint task force on ferries is created, to be composed of:

       (a) Eight members of the legislature selected as follows:

       (i) Four members of the senate, two from each of the major caucuses, to be appointed by the chair of the senate transportation committee;

       (ii) Four members of the house of representatives, two from each of the major caucuses, to be appointed by the cochairs of the house of representatives transportation committee; and

       (b) At least one person designated by the cochairs representing each of the following:

       (i) Ferry advisory committees;

       (ii) Persons who do not use ferries;

       (iii) Labor organizations representing ferry workers;

       (iv) Washington State Ferries;

       (v) Transit operators;

       (vi) The office of financial management; and

       (vii) Other groups as deemed appropriate by the cochairs of the task force.

       (2) The transportation committees shall provide staff support as mutually agreed by the cochairs of the joint select committee. The chair of the senate transportation committee and the cochairs of the house of representatives transportation committee shall designate the cochairs.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 20. The joint task force on ferries shall meet during the interim and report back to the transportation committees of the senate and house of representatives by December 15, 2000. The task force is charged with development of an orderly process to examine all possible solutions that are presented to the task force, including, but not limited to, continued operation of passenger-only ferry service by Washington State Ferries, state and local partnerships, local partnerships, government and nonprofit partnerships, and private operations. The task force shall consider public options first, nonprofit options second, and private operations third.

       The report to the senate and house of representatives transportation committees must include, but is not limited to, analysis and recommendations on the following:

       (1) Continued operation of all current passenger-only ferry routes and levels of service by Washington State Ferries;

       (2) Continued operation of selected passenger-only ferry routes or reduced levels of service on selected routes;

       (3) Operation of selected routes by any public entity or combination of public entities;

       (4) Operation of selected routes by any nonprofit entity or combination of nonprofit entities;

       (5) Operation of selected routes by any private entity or combination of private entities;

       (6) Ferry fare equity between ferry routes of different lengths;

       (7) Establishment of a target for recovery of operating costs from fare revenue when operations include participation by a public entity; and

       (8) In consultation with Washington State Ferries, the feasibility of transferring an auto ferry to cover a route between Vashon/Southworth and downtown Seattle if passenger-only service is discontinued.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 21. Sections 1 through 13 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 81 RCW.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 22. Sections 19 and 20 of this act are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and take effect immediately."

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Betti Sheldon moved that the following amendment to the striking amendment by Senators Tim Sheldon, Oke and Haugen be adopted:

       On page 2, line 15, after "Any" insert "public entities,"

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senator Betti Sheldon on page 2, line 15, to the striking amendment by Senators Tim Sheldon, Oke and Haugen to Substitute Senate Bill No. 6212.

      The motion by Senator Betti Sheldon carried and the amendment to the striking amendment was adopted.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the striking amendment by Senators Tim Sheldon, Oke and Haugen, as amended, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 6212.

      Debate ensued.

      The motion by Senator Tim Sheldon carried and the striking amendment, as amended, was adopted.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Goings, the following title amendment was adopted:

      On page 1, line 1 of the title, after "ferries;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 81.84.010, 81.84.060, and 47.60.120; adding new sections to chapter 81.104 RCW; adding a new chapter to Title 81 RCW; creating new sections; and declaring an emergency."

 

 

 

      On motion of Senator Goings, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6212 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6212.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6212 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote:   Yeas, 35; Nays, 13; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Benton, Deccio, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Long, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Stevens, Swecker, West, Winsley and Zarelli - 35.

     Voting nay: Senators Bauer, Brown, Costa, Fairley, Franklin, Heavey, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Loveland, Prentice, Spanel, Thibaudeau and Wojahn - 13.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6212, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6552, by Senators Jacobsen, Oke, Kohl-Welles, Fraser and Spanel

 

Studying recreational opportunities available in the west slope of the Cascade foothills.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Jacobsen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6552 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6552 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Jacobsen, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6552 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6552.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6552 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 48.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6552, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6450, by Senator Jacobsen

 

Creating the wildlife publications account.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Jacobsen, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6450 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6450 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Jacobsen, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6450 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6450.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6450 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 48.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6450, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6554, by Senators Long, Hargrove, Costa and Winsley

 

Changing provisions relating to less restrictive alternative mental health commitments.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6554 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6554 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Hargrove, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6554 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Honeyford, Senator Deccio was excused.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6554.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6554 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Excused: Senators Deccio and Sellar - 2.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6554, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6363, by Senators Gardner, Patterson, McCaslin, Winsley and Costa

 

Clarifying procedures for absentee voting and mail ballots.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Gardner, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6363 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6363 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Gardner, the following amendment by Senators Gardner and Horn was adopted:

       On page 17, line 19, delete all of sections 24 and 25 and insert the following:

       "Sec. 24. RCW 29.04.055 and 1986 c 167 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

       COMBINING OR DIVIDING PRECINCTS, ELECTION BOARDS. At any ((election, general or)) special election((,)) or ((at any)) primary, the county auditor may combine, unite, or divide precincts and may combine or unite election boards for the purpose of holding such election. At any general election, the county auditor may combine or unite election boards for the purpose of holding such election, but shall report all election returns by individual precinct.

       Sec. 25. RCW 29.62.090 and 1999 c 298 s 21 are each amended to read as follows:

       ABSTRACT BY ELECTION OFFICER--TRANSMITTAL TO SECRETARY OF STATE. (1) Immediately after the official results of a state primary ((or general election)) in a county are ascertained, the county auditor or other election officer shall make an abstract of the number of registered voters in each precinct and of all the votes cast in the county at such state primary ((or general election)) for and against state measures and for each candidate for federal, state, and legislative office or for any other office which the secretary of state is required by law to canvass. The abstract shall be entered on blanks furnished by the secretary of state or on compatible computer printouts approved by the secretary of state, and transmitted to the secretary of state no later than the next business day following the certification by the county canvassing board.

       (2) After each general election, the county auditor or other election officer shall ((provide to the secretary of state a report)) make an abstract of the number of registered voters and all((absentee)) ballots cast in each precinct at such general election for and against state measures and for each candidate for federal, state, and legislative office or for any other office which the secretary of state is required by law to canvass. ((The report may be included in the abstract required by this section or may be transmitted to the secretary of state separately, but in no event later than March 31 of the year following the election.)) Absentee ballot results may be incorporated into votes cast at the polls for each precinct or may be reported separately on a precinct-by-precinct basis. The abstract shall be entered on blanks furnished by the secretary of state or on compatible computer printouts approved by the secretary of state, and transmitted to the secretary of state no later than the next business day following the certification by the county canvassing board.

       (3) If absentee ballot results are not incorporated into votes cast at the polls, the county auditor or other election official may aggregate results from more than one precinct if the auditor, pursuant to rules adopted by the secretary of state, finds that reporting a single precinct's absentee ballot results would jeopardize the secrecy of a person's ballot. To the extent practicable, precincts for which absentee results are aggregated shall be contiguous."

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Gardner, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6363 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6363.

 

 

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6363 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Excused: Senators Deccio and Sellar - 2.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6363, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Franklin, Senator Loveland was excused.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6478, by Senators McAuliffe, Kohl-Welles, Goings, Eide, Patterson and Rasmussen

 

Developing training requirements for handlers of food in schools.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator McAuliffe, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6478 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6478 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      Senator Zarelli moved that the following striking amendment by Senators McAuliffe and Zarelli be adopted:

       Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

       "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature finds that over four hundred thousand breakfasts and lunches are served in Washington's schools each school day. The legislature further finds that food safety standards specifically tailored to food service workers in schools will help maintain and improve the high standards of service currently provided in our schools.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 69.06 RCW to read as follows:

       The state board of health shall, in consultation with the department of health, the superintendent of public instruction, local health jurisdictions, representatives of food and nutrition service employees, and representatives of the food service industry, adopt rules establishing minimum food safety and sanitation training requirements specifically designed for kitchen managers and lead kitchen workers hired by school districts to handle or prepare food. In developing the rules, the state board of health shall consider the specific health risks applicable to children. The rules shall apply to school employees hired, renewing a food and beverage service worker's permit, or transferring into a kitchen manager or lead kitchen worker position, after the effective date of this section."

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the striking amendment by Senators McAuliffe and Zarelli to Substitute Senate Bill No. 6478.

      The motion by Senator Zarelli carried and the striking amendment was adopted.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator McAuliffe, the following title amendment was adopted:

       On page 1, line 1 of the title, after "schools;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "adding a new section to chapter 69.06 RCW; and creating a new section."

      On motion of Senator McAuliffe, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6478 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6478.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6478 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Excused: Senators Loveland and Sellar - 2.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6478, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6586, by Senators Prentice, Hale, Winsley, Goings, Oke and Gardner (by request of Attorney General Gregoire)

 

Prohibiting pyramid schemes.

 

 

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Prentice, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6586 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6586 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Prentice, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6586 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

 

POINT OF INQUIRY

 

      Senator Morton: “Senator Prentice, I don’t understand this. I was not in the committee. I have tried, in the diagrams that I have been sent--and I have been sent over fifty letters--none of which asked me to vote for this. I have been trying to design a pyramid out of this and I can’t do it graphically. As I understand it, it is dependent upon club membership, that this is a club process and it is a membership into the club. So, I would like to have you explain about that and also if there is a risk involved. The diagrams that I have been sent indicate that it is merely a risk of one to eight. Comparing that to the state lottery or other risk areas--even my own agriculture--that ain’t much risk. I would like some response.”

      Senator Prentice: “Certainly, there is a big difference, Senator Morton. First of all, agriculture is not against the law and the lottery is part of the law. That is the first thing. Pyramid schemes are clearly against the law. The pyramid is based on the recruitment of new members and you will have a number of them. They have to invest money in order to be part of it. As they move up, they are expected to recoup their finances. Some of them are as little as fifty. We have heard of some that are based on five thousand dollars even to be a part of it.

      “The people that you are hearing from that are so frantic are the ones that are at the bottom and have invested money and are afraid that they are not going to get at the top. Then, they come back in, but each step is dependent on the investment of money. They are telling us this is about friendship, about empowering women and I am saying that is really pathetic to have to earn friends via the investment of money. I never have had any friends that I had to pay in order to be my friends. This has been clearly illegal for many, many years and there is nothing new. They are like an exaggerated form of the pigeon drop--people who pretend to be your friends and all they are there for is to take your money.”

      Senator Morton: “If I could just continue with one more question, please. Thank you for that explanation. However, I still have not grasped the significance between this club and what is commonly known as a stock market investment club. Would you care to comment on that?”

      Senator Prentice: “Yes, and I am not clear by what you mean by a stock market investment club. If it is already an illegal operation, then it is clearly illegal. You said, agriculture--sure that is a gamble, but that is a gamble that is legal. Pyramid clubs are clearly illegal and have been for a long time. There is nothing new in this bill that changes that. What we are changing is the penalties involved. They have always been there and it is very unfortunate that this has been spreading throughout our state. It is tragic that many people are really being fleeced. So, I would urge your ‘yes’ vote.”

.     Further debate ensued.

 

DEMAND FOR THE PREVIOUS QUESTION

 

      Senators Snyder, Bauer and Wojahn demanded the previous question and the demand was sustained.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be shall the main question be now put.

      The demand for the previous question carried.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Franklin, Senator Thibaudeau was excused.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Jacobsen, Senators Brown and Eide were excused.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6586.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6586 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 35; Nays, 10; Absent, 0; Excused, 4.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Costa, Deccio, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McDonald, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, West, Winsley and Wojahn - 35.

     Voting nay: Senators Benton, Finkbeiner, Johnson, McCaslin, Morton, Roach, Rossi, Stevens, Swecker and Zarelli - 10.

     Excused: Senators Brown, Eide, Sellar and Thibaudeau - 4.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6586, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6354, by Senators Kline, Franklin, Wojahn, Fairley, Kohl-Welles, Prentice and Costa

 

Contracting for services performed by classified employees.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Kline, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6354 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6354 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Kline, the following amendment by Senators Kline, Zarelli and McAuliffe was adopted:

       On page 1, beginning on line 14, after "RCW." strike all material through "provide." on line 17, and insert "The school district shall provide the office of the superintendent of public instruction with the same employee information on contracted employees under this section that a school district or educational service district is required to provide on school district and educational service district employees."

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Kline, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6354 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6354.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6354 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 39; Nays, 9; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Thibaudeau, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 39.

     Voting nay: Senators Deccio, Finkbeiner, Hale, Horn, McCaslin, McDonald, Rossi, Swecker and West - 9.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6354, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6211, by Senator T. Sheldon

 

Concerning the use of access road revolving fund moneys.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Jacobsen, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6211 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6211.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6211 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 36; Nays, 12; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Deccio, Finkbeiner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Stevens, Swecker, West, Winsley and Zarelli - 36.

     Voting nay: Senators Costa, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Patterson, Spanel, Thibaudeau and Wojahn - 12.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6211, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6446, by Senators Patterson and Oke (by request of Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development)

 

Providing for review and evaluation of a city or county's comprehensive growth plan.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Tim Sheldon moved that the following amendment be adopted:

       On page 3, after line 7, insert the following:

       "NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 36.70A RCW to read as follows:

       (1)(a) A rural county, after conferring with its cities, may develop alternative methods of achieving the planning goals established by RCW 36.70A.020.

       (b) The authority provided by this subsection may not be used to modify:

       (i) Requirements for the designation and protection of critical areas or for the designation of natural resource lands under RCW 36.70A.060(2), 36.70A.170, and 36.70A.172; or

       (ii) The requirement to establish a process for the siting of essential public facilities pursuant to RCW 36.70A.200.

       (c) Before adopting any alternative methods of achieving the planning goals established by RCW 36.70A.020, a rural county shall provide an opportunity for public review and comment. An ordinance or resolution proposing or adopting alternative methods must be submitted to the department in the same manner as provided in RCW 36.70A.106 for submittal of proposed and adopted comprehensive plans and development regulations.

       (2) For purposes of this section, "rural county" means a county with a population density of less than one hundred persons per square mile as determined by the office of financial management and published each year by the department for the period July 1st to June 30th.

       Sec. 3. RCW 36.70A.320 and 1997 c 429 s 20 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, comprehensive plans and development regulations, and amendments thereto, adopted under this chapter are presumed valid upon adoption.

       (2) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (4) of this section, the burden is on the petitioner to demonstrate that any action taken by a state agency, county, or city under this chapter is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter.

       (3) In any petition under this chapter, the board, after full consideration of the petition, shall determine whether there is compliance with the requirements of this chapter. In making its determination, the board shall consider the criteria adopted by the department under RCW 36.70A.190(4). The board shall find compliance unless it determines that the action by the state agency, county, or city is clearly erroneous in view of the entire record before the board and in light of the goals and requirements of this chapter. In any petition concerning whether or not a rural county's methods of achieving planning goals are in compliance with this chapter, the board shall give great weight to decisions made by the rural county with regard to developing alternative methods of achieving planning goals under section 2 of this act, and the board shall find that such alternative methods are in compliance with this chapter unless it finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the alternative methods will not achieve the planning goals established by RCW 36.70A.020.

       (4) A county or city subject to a determination of invalidity made under RCW 36.70A.300 or 36.70A.302 has the burden of demonstrating that the ordinance or resolution it has enacted in response to the determination of invalidity will no longer substantially interfere with the fulfillment of the goals of this chapter under the standard in RCW 36.70A.302(1).

       (5) The shoreline element of a comprehensive plan and the applicable development regulations adopted by a county or city shall take effect as provided in chapter 90.58 RCW."

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senator Tim Sheldon on page 3, after line 7, to Senate Bill No. 6446.

      The motion by Senator Tim Sheldon failed and the amendment was not adopted on a rising vote.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Fraser, the following amendment by Senators Fraser, Patterson, Swecker, Morton and Snyder was adopted:

       On page 3, after line 7, insert the following:

       "Sec. 2. RCW 90.58.080 and 1995 c 347 s 305 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) To assist local governments in aligning the related work of reviewing and revising comprehensive plans and development regulations under section 1 of this act, the department upon the request of a local government may grant an extension of up to an additional twelve months to the deadlines provided in this section for developing and amending the shoreline master program element of comprehensive plans.

       (2) Local governments shall develop or amend((, within twenty-four months after the adoption of guidelines as provided in RCW 90.58.060,)) a master program for regulation of uses of the shorelines of the state consistent with the required elements of the guidelines adopted by the department. Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section as to state guidelines adopted before December 31, 2000, master programs shall be reviewed for compliance with the guidelines and adopted or amended as necessary within twenty-four months after the adoption of guidelines as provided in RCW 90.58.060.

       (3) Consistent with the priority salmon recovery regions identified in the state-wide strategy to recover salmon and population growth data provided by the office of financial management, the following master program development or amendment schedule applies for guidelines adopted by the department before December 31, 2000:

       (a) For King, Snohomish, Pierce, Clark, and Kitsap counties and the cities and towns therein with shorelines of the state, master programs shall be reviewed for compliance with the guidelines and adopted or amended as necessary within thirty-six months after the adoption of guidelines as provided in RCW 90.58.060;

       (b) For Thurston, Whatcom, Benton, Yakima, Skagit, Cowlitz, Clallam, Chelan, Mason, and Jefferson counties and the cities and towns therein with shorelines of the state, master programs shall be reviewed for compliance with the guidelines and adopted or amended as necessary within forty-eight months after the adoption of guidelines as provided in RCW 90.58.060;

       (c) For all other counties, cities, and towns with shorelines of the state, master programs shall be reviewed for compliance with the guidelines and adopted or amended as necessary within sixty months after the adoption of guidelines amendments as provided in RCW 90.58.060."

       Renumber the sections consecutively and correct any internal references accordingly.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Fraser, the following amendment by Senators Fraser, Rasmussen, Snyder, Roach, McCaslin, Swecker, Benton, Patterson, Eide, Wojahn, Franklin, McAuliffe, Morton, Rossi, Goings, Zarelli, Stevens, Johnson, Shin, T. Sheldon, Oke, Hale, Costa, Honeyford and Gardner was adopted:

       On page 3, after line 7, insert the following:

       "Sec. 2. RCW 36.61.020 and 1987 c 432 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) To assist with development and implementation of elements of comprehensive plans related to long-term lake management objectives in coordination with revision of comprehensive plans, local governments may create lake management districts for any needed period of time.

       (2) Any county may create lake management districts to finance the improvement and maintenance of lakes located within or partially within the boundaries of the county. All or a portion of a lake and the adjacent land areas may be included within one or more lake management districts. More than one lake, or portions of lakes, and the adjacent land areas may be included in a single lake management district. ((A lake management district may be created for a period of up to ten years.))

       Special assessments or rates and charges may be imposed on the property included within a lake management district to finance lake improvement and maintenance activities, including: (1) The control or removal of aquatic plants and vegetation; (2) water quality; (3) the control of water levels; (4) storm water diversion and treatment; (5) agricultural waste control; (6) studying lake water quality problems and solutions; (7) cleaning and maintaining ditches and streams entering or leaving the lake; and (8) the related administrative, engineering, legal, and operational costs, including the costs of creating the lake management district.

       Special assessments or rates and charges may be imposed annually on all the land in a lake management district for the duration of the lake management district without a related issuance of lake management district bonds or revenue bonds. Special assessments also may be imposed in the manner of special assessments in a local improvement district with each landowner being given the choice of paying the entire special assessment in one payment, or to paying installments, with lake management district bonds being issued to obtain moneys not derived by the initial full payment of the special assessments, and the installments covering all of the costs related to issuing, selling, and redeeming the lake management district bonds.

       Sec. 3. RCW 36.61.260 and 1985 c 398 s 26 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) Counties may issue lake management district bonds in accordance with this section. Lake management district bonds may be issued to obtain money sufficient to cover that portion of the special assessments that are not paid within the thirty-day period provided in RCW 36.61.190. ((The maximum term of lake management district bonds shall be ten years.))

       Whenever lake management district bonds are proposed to be issued, the county legislative authority shall create a special fund or funds for the lake management district from which all or a portion of the costs of the lake improvement and maintenance activities shall be paid. Lake management district bonds shall not be issued in excess of the costs and expenses of the lake improvement and maintenance activities and shall not be issued prior to twenty days after the thirty days allowed for the payment of special assessments without interest or penalties.

       Lake management district bonds shall be exclusively payable from the special fund or funds and from a guaranty fund that the county may have created out of a portion of proceeds from the sale of the lake management district bonds.

       (2) Lake management district bonds shall not constitute a general indebtedness of the county issuing the bond nor an obligation, general or special, of the state. The owner of any lake management district bond shall not have any claim for the payment thereof against the county that issues the bonds except for payment from the special assessments made for the lake improvement or maintenance activities for which the lake management district bond was issued and from a lake management district guaranty fund that may have been created. The county shall not be liable to the owner of any lake management district bond for any loss to the lake management district guaranty fund occurring in the lawful operation of the fund. The owner of a lake management district bond shall not have any claim against the state arising from the lake management district bond, special assessments, or guaranty fund. Tax revenues shall not be used to secure or guarantee the payment of the principal of or interest on lake management district bonds.

       The substance of the limitations included in this subsection shall be plainly printed, written, engraved, or reproduced on: (a) Each lake management district bond that is a physical instrument; (b) the official notice of sale; and (c) each official statement associated with the lake management district bonds.

       (3) If the county fails to make any principal or interest payments on any lake management district bond or to promptly collect any special assessment securing the bonds when due, the owner of the lake management district bond may obtain a writ of mandamus from any court of competent jurisdiction requiring the county to collect the special assessments, foreclose on the related lien, and make payments out of the special fund or guaranty fund if one exists. Any number of owners of lake management districts may join as plaintiffs.

       (4) A county may create a lake management district bond guaranty fund for each issue of lake management district bonds. The guaranty fund shall only exist for the life of the lake management district bonds with which it is associated. A portion of the bond proceeds may be placed into a guaranty fund. Unused moneys remaining in the guaranty fund during the last two years of the installments shall be used to proportionally reduce the required level of installments and shall be transferred into the special fund into which installment payments are placed.

       (5) Lake management district bonds shall be issued and sold in accordance with chapter 39.46 RCW. The authority to create a special fund or funds shall include the authority to create accounts within a fund.

       Renumber the sections consecutively and correct any internal references accordingly.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Fraser, the following title amendments were considered simultaneously and were adopted:

      On page 1, line 1 of the title, delete everything beginning with "extension" through "36.70A.130" and insert "comprehensive plan review and amendment and affected timelines; and amending RCW 36.61.020, 36.61.260, and 36.70A.130"

       On page 1, on line 1 of the title, delete everything beginning with "extension" through '36.70A.130" on line 2, and insert "extending deadlines for review and amendment of comprehensive plans; and amendment RCW 36.70A.130 and 90.58.080".

      On motion of Senator Fraser, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6446 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6446.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6446 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 48.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 6446, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6642, by Senators Benton, Heavey, Shin and Oke

 

Preventing a registered sex offender from holding a real estate appraiser license or certificate.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Benton, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6642 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6642.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6642 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Absent: Senator Hargrove - 1.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6642, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6606, by Senators Honeyford and Stevens

 

Clarifying the number of landowners needed on petitions to merge minor irrigation districts into other special purpose districts.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Honeyford, the following amendment by Senators Honeyford and Patterson was adopted:

       On page 3, line 3, after "special meeting." insert "For the purpose of determining the number of landowners required to initiate merger proceedings under this section, a husband and wife owning property as community property shall be considered a single landowner, two or more persons or entities holding title to property as tenants in common, joint tenants, tenants in partnership, or other form of joint ownership shall be considered a single landowner, and the petition requesting the merger may be signed by either the husband or wife and by any one of the co-owners of jointly owned property. The petition requesting the merger shall be considered by the county legislative authority or authorities."

      On motion of Senator Honeyford, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6606 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6606.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 6606 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 47.

     Absent: Senator Eide - 1.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 6606, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Honeyford, Senator Deccio was excused.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6622, by Senators Shin, Rasmussen, Kohl-Welles, Sheahan, McAuliffe, Prentice, B. Sheldon, Winsley, Finkbeiner, Benton, Fairley, Eide, Goings, Bauer, Franklin, Haugen, Gardner, Loveland, T. Sheldon, Jacobsen, Hargrove, Kline, Fraser, Heavey, Patterson, Hale and Roach

 

Designating Asian Pacific American Heritage Month.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Patterson, Senate Bill No. 6622 was not substituted.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Patterson, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6622 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6622.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6622 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 46; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 46.

     Absent: Senator Snyder - 1.

     Excused: Senators Deccio and Sellar - 2.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6622, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6257, by Senators Rasmussen, Morton and Stevens

 

Repealing the Washington fresh fruit sales limitation act.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Rasmussen, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6257 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6257.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6257 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 46; Nays, 0; Absent, 1; Excused, 2.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 46.

     Absent: Senator Kline - 1.

     Excused: Senators Deccio and Sellar - 2.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6257, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6666, by Senators Gardner, Swecker, Haugen, Morton and Sellar

 

Denying telecommunications services to unlicensed household goods carriers.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Gardner, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6666 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6666.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6666 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 43; Nays, 5; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 43.

    Voting nay: Senators Finkbeiner, Hochstatter, Johnson, Morton and Sheldon, T. - 5.

    Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6666, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6690, by Senators McCaslin and Oke

 

Clarifying authority for counties, cities, and towns to create independent salary commissions.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Patterson, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6690 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6690 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      Senator Costa moved that the following amendments by Senators Costa and McCaslin be considered simultaneously and be adopted:

      On page 2, line 7, after "salaries of" strike "mayors, county commissioners, city councilmembers" and insert "city or town elected officials, county commissioners"

       On page 5, line 1, after "Salaries for" strike "mayors and councilmembers" and insert "elected officials"

       On page 5, line 2, after "set by" strike "mayor and council"

       On page 5, line 5, after "commissions" insert "shall be appointed in accordance with the provisions of a city charter, or as specified in this subsection"

       On page 5, line 23, after "as to" strike "the mayor and all members of the city council" and insert "all city or town elected officials"

       On page 5, line 26, after "incumbent" strike "mayors and councilmembers" and insert "city or town elected officials"

       On page 5, line 38, after "Constitution," strike "city charter, and" and insert "or city charter, or"

       On page 6, beginning on line 1, after "salary" strike "of a city or town mayor or councilmember"

       On page 6, line 5, after "salaries" strike "of mayors and councilmembers"

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendments by Senators Costa and McCaslin on page 2, line 7; page 5, lines 1, 2, 5, 23, 26, and 38; and page 6, beginning on line 1, and line 5; to Substitute Senate Bill No. 6690.

      The motion by Senator Costa carried and the amendments were adopted.

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Patterson moved that the following amendment by Senators Patterson and McCaslin be adopted:

       On page 6, line 17, after "(2)" strike all language through "to" and insert "Commissions established under subsection (1) of this section shall"

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senators Patterson and McCaslin on page 6, line 17, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 6690.

      The motion by Senator Patterson carried and the amendment was adopted.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Patterson, the following title amendment was adopted:

       On page 1, line 2 of the title, after "town" strike "mayors and councilmembers" and insert "elected officials"

      On motion of Senator Patterson, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6690 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6690.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6690 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 38; Nays, 9; Absent, 1; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Honeyford, Jacobsen, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley and Wojahn - 38.

     Voting nay: Senators Benton, Fraser, Heavey, Hochstatter, Johnson, Roach, Rossi, Sheldon, T. and Zarelli - 9.

     Absent: Senator Horn - 1.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6690, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 5704, by Senators Kohl-Welles and Thibaudeau

 

Authorizing adoption of rules to implement medical marijuana law.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Thibaudeau, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5704 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 5704 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      On motion of Senator Thibaudeau, the rules were suspended, Substitute Senate Bill No. 5704 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5704.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute Senate Bill No. 5704 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 37; Nays, 11; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Heavey, Hochstatter, Jacobsen, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, Morton, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley and Wojahn - 37.

     Voting nay: Senators Benton, Haugen, Honeyford, Horn, Johnson, McDonald, Oke, Rossi, Sheahan, Stevens and Zarelli - 11.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5704, having received the constitutional two-thirds majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6713, by Senators Patterson, Horn and Winsley (by request of Secretary of State Munro)

 

Revising the Washington state quality award program.

 

      The bill was read the second time.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Patterson, the rules were suspended, Senate Bill No. 6713 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6713.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Senate Bill No. 6713 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 48; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 1.

     Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Benton, Brown, Costa, Deccio, Eide, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Gardner, Goings, Hale, Hargrove, Haugen, Heavey, Hochstatter, Honeyford, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, Loveland, McAuliffe, McCaslin, McDonald, Morton, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, B., Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 48.

     Excused: Senator Sellar - 1.

      SENATE BILL NO. 6713, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill will stand as the title of the act.

 

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6231, by Senators Fairley and Oke (by request of Department of Labor and Industries)

 

Regulating telecommunications contractors and installations.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Fairley, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6231 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      Senator Finkbeiner moved that the following amendment by Senators Finkbeiner and Tim Sheldon be adopted:

       On page 7, line 39, after "closets." insert the following:

       "Telecommunications scope of work does not include the installation of computer cabling or wiring systems that do not penetrate fire barriers and do not include the installation of new conduit, pathway, or raceway systems, or that do not require issuance of a county or city building or construction permit."

       Renumber the sections consecutively and correct any internal references accordingly.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senators Finkbeiner and Tim Sheldon on page 7, line 39, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231.

      The motion by Senator Finkbeiner failed and the amendment was not adopted on a rising vote.

 

POINT OF ORDER

 

      Senator Snyder: “A point of order, Mr. President. I believe the time is 4:55 p.m. and we have a Special Order of Business on Senate Bill No. 6566 at this time.”

 

PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY

 

      Senator Snyder: “A parliamentary inquiry, Mr. President. I would like to know the disposition of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231, the one we were working on when we went to the Special Order of Business.”

 

REPLY BY THE PRESIDENT

 

      President Owen: “The position that it was on? Senator, is that your question?”

      Senator Snyder: “Mr. President, my question is, can we can continue working on Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231 after we finish Senate Bill No. 6566?”

 

RULING BY THE PRESIDENT

 

      President Owen: “Based on previous rulings by the President, when you go to a Special Order of Business, you may return to the bill that you were working on once you have completed the Special Order of Business.”

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Goings, Senator Hargrove was excused.

 

SECOND READING

 

      SENATE BILL NO. 6566, by Senators Kohl-Welles, Long, Swecker, Kline, Hale, Costa, Thibaudeau, Prentice, Spanel, Gardner, Bauer, Shin, Jacobsen, B. Sheldon, Patterson, McAuliffe and Winsley

 

Allowing for the creation of a local parks authority.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Patterson, Substitute Senate Bill No. 6566 was substituted for Senate Bill No. 6566 and the substitute bill was placed on second reading and read the second time.

      Senator Horn moved that the following striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale be adopted:

       Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

       "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. (1) For the purpose of acquisition, construction, remodeling, equipping, repairing, maintaining, and operating a public zoo, aquarium, other parks, and open space, the legislative authority of a city with a population of over one hundred fifty thousand that is not in a metropolitan park district may, subject to section 2 of this act, levy an annual regular property tax not exceeding fifty cents per thousand dollars of assessed valuation in the city.

       (2) The levy under this section is in addition to the levy of a city under RCW 84.52.043 and 41.16.060.

       (3) The limitation in RCW 84.55.010 does not apply to the first levy imposed under this section.

       (4) Proceeds of the taxes levied under this section may not be applied to the payment of principal of or interest on bonds with maturities greater than ten years.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. (1) A city shall have no authority to levy taxes under section 1 of this act until that power is activated by vote of the city's voters at a regular election or a special election called for that purpose. The ballot proposition whether to activate the city's regular taxing power under this act shall propose an initial regular tax rate or amount and shall also propose a maximum regular tax rate or amount. If the voters approve a regular tax rate or amount, that approval shall serve as the voter approval required by Initiative Measure No. 695 for all increases in general regular taxes under this act up to the maximum approved tax rate or amount.

       (2) Any city placing on the ballot a proposition to authorize the levy of taxes under this act shall, in the ballot ordinance, agree to continue, for so long as the city levies general taxes under this act, to appropriate annually for park and recreation purposes, from sources other than general taxes levied under this act, at least the same dollar amount the city appropriated for park and recreation purposes in the last annual budget adopted before the effective date of this act.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. In the ordinance placing on the ballot the proposition called for by section 2 of this act, the city legislative authority shall specify the minimum or maximum shares, as percentages or dollar amounts or both, of revenue from taxes under section 1 of this act that shall, annually or cumulatively, be devoted during the first ten years those taxes are collected to each of the following: (1) A public zoo, (2) a public aquarium, and (3) other parks and open space.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. All instances in which voter approval is called for under sections 1 and 2 of this act shall require an affirmative vote of a majority of the voters of the city voting on the proposition at a general election held within the city or at a special election called by the city held in conjunction with a state general or primary election.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. (1) If the legislative authority of a city whose voters have authorized taxes under section 1 of this act contracts with one or more nonprofit corporations or other public organizations for the overall management and operation of a zoo, an aquarium, or both, that contract shall be subject to this section. No such contract for the overall management and operation of zoo or aquarium facilities by a nonprofit corporation or other public organization shall have an initial term or any renewal term longer than thirty years, but may be renewed by the legislative authority of the city upon the expiration of an initial term or any renewal term.

       (2) Before approving each initial and any renewal contract with a nonprofit corporation or other public organization for the overall management and operation of any facilities, the city legislative authority shall hold a public hearing on the proposed management and operation by the nonprofit corporation or other public organization. At least thirty days prior to the hearing, a public notice setting forth the date, time, and place of the hearing must be published at least once in a local newspaper of general circulation. Notice of the hearing shall also be mailed or otherwise delivered to all who would be entitled to notice of a special meeting of the city legislative authority under RCW 42.30.080. The notice shall identify the facilities involved and the nonprofit corporation or other public organization proposed for management and operation under the contract with the city. The terms and conditions under which the city proposes to contract with the nonprofit corporation or other public organization for management and operation shall be available upon request from and after the date of publication of the hearing notice and at the hearing, but after the public hearing the city legislative authority may amend the proposed terms and conditions at open public meetings.

       (3) As part of the management and operation contract, the legislative authority of the city may authorize the managing and operating entity to grant to any nonprofit corporation or public or private organization franchises or concessions that further the public use and enjoyment of the zoo or aquarium, as the case may be, and may authorize the managing and operating entity to contract with any public or private organization for any specific services as are routinely so procured by the city.

       (4) Notwithstanding any provision in the charter of the city so contracting for the overall management and operation of a zoo or an aquarium, or any other provision of law, the nonprofit corporation or other public organization with responsibility for overall management or operation of any such facilities pursuant to a contract under this section may, in carrying out that responsibility under such contract, manage, supervise, and control those employees of the city employed in connection with the zoo or aquarium and may hire, fire, and otherwise discipline those employees. Notwithstanding any provision in the charter of the city so contracting for the overall management and operation of a zoo or an aquarium, or any other provision of law, the civil service system of any such city shall provide for the nonprofit corporation or other public organization to manage, supervise, control, hire, fire, and otherwise discipline those employees of the city employed in connection with the zoo or aquarium.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to affect any terms, conditions, or practices contained in a collective bargaining agreement in effect on the effective date of this act.

       Sec. 7. RCW 84.52.010 and 1995 2nd sp.s. c 13 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

       Except as is permitted under RCW 84.55.050, all taxes shall be levied or voted in specific amounts.

       The rate percent of all taxes for state and county purposes, and purposes of taxing districts coextensive with the county, shall be determined, calculated and fixed by the county assessors of the respective counties, within the limitations provided by law, upon the assessed valuation of the property of the county, as shown by the completed tax rolls of the county, and the rate percent of all taxes levied for purposes of taxing districts within any county shall be determined, calculated and fixed by the county assessors of the respective counties, within the limitations provided by law, upon the assessed valuation of the property of the taxing districts respectively.

       When a county assessor finds that the aggregate rate of tax levy on any property, that is subject to the limitations set forth in RCW 84.52.043 or 84.52.050, exceeds the limitations provided in either of these sections, the assessor shall recompute and establish a consolidated levy in the following manner:

       (1) The full certified rates of tax levy for state, county, county road district, and city or town purposes shall be extended on the tax rolls in amounts not exceeding the limitations established by law; however any state levy shall take precedence over all other levies and shall not be reduced for any purpose other than that required by RCW 84.55.010. If, as a result of the levies imposed under RCW 84.52.069, 84.34.230, the portion of the levy by a metropolitan park district that was protected under RCW 84.52.120, and 84.52.105, the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then these levies shall be reduced as follows: (a) The portion of the levy by a metropolitan park district that is protected under RCW 84.52.120 shall be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or shall be eliminated; (b) if the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then the levy by a city under section 1 of this act shall be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or shall be eliminated; (c) if the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then the levies imposed under RCW 84.34.230, 84.52.105, and any portion of the levy imposed under RCW 84.52.069 that is in excess of thirty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value, shall be reduced on a pro rata basis until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or shall be eliminated; and (((c))) (d) if the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then the thirty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value of tax levy imposed under RCW 84.52.069 shall be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or eliminated.

       (2) The certified rates of tax levy subject to these limitations by cities levying under section 1 of this act and by all junior taxing districts imposing taxes on such property shall be reduced or eliminated as follows to bring the consolidated levy of taxes on such property within the provisions of these limitations:

       (a) First, the levy of a city under section 1 of this act shall be reduced or eliminated;

       (b) Second, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of those junior taxing districts authorized under RCW 36.68.525, 36.69.145, and 67.38.130 shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

       (((b) Second)) (c) Third, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of flood control zone districts shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

       (((c) Third)) (d) Fourth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of all other junior taxing districts, other than fire protection districts, library districts, the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for metropolitan park districts, and the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for public hospital districts, shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated;

       (((d) Fourth)) (e) Fifth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates authorized to fire protection districts under RCW 52.16.140 and 52.16.160 shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated; and

       (((e) Fifth)) (f) Sixth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates authorized for fire protection districts under RCW 52.16.130, library districts, metropolitan park districts under their first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levy, and public hospital districts under their first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levy, shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated.

       In determining whether the aggregate rate of tax levy on any property, that is subject to the limitations set forth in RCW 84.52.050, exceeds the limitations provided in that section, the assessor shall use the hypothetical state levy, as apportioned to the county under RCW 84.48.080, that was computed under RCW 84.48.080 without regard to the reduction under RCW 84.55.012.

       NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. Sections 1 through 6 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 35 RCW."

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Heavey moved that the following amendments to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale be considered simultaneously and be adopted:

      On page 1, line 7 of the amendment, after "(1)" insert "(a)"

       On page 1, after line 14 of the amendment, insert the following:

       "(b) For the purposes of this chapter, "other parks" means low-income housing, homeless shelters, transit facilities, public schools, correctional facilities, homes for the ill, including the mentally ill, and open space.

       (c) Funds collected from the tax authorized in this section shall be expended for the purposes listed in the following order of priority: (i) Low-income housing; (ii) homeless shelters; (iii) transit facilities; (iv) public schools; (v) correctional facilities; (vi) homes for the ill, including the mentally ill; (vii) zoos; and (viii) aquariums."

      Debate ensued

 

POINT OF INQUIRY

 

      Senator Jacobsen: “Senator Heavey, if this amendment passes and we have, as I understand it, this striking amendment that reduces the tax to ten cents per thousand dollars and then state that the tax can only be used for zoos and/or aquariums, are you also planning on offering that amendment?”

      Senator Heavey: “At this time, I cannot answer. If this amendment does pass, I would withdraw that amendment, though.”

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendments by Senator Heavey on page 1, line 7, and page 1, after line 14, to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale.

      The motion by Senator Heavey failed and the amendments to the striking amendment were not adopted.

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Heavey moved that the following amendment to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale be adopted:On page 1, after line 21 of the amendment, insert the following:

       "(5) The legislative authorities of those cities with a population of more than one hundred fifty thousand and that have aquariums are encouraged to conduct a joint study on the feasibility of having one regional aquarium."

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senator Heavey on page 1, after line 21, to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale.

      The motion by Senator Heavey failed and the amendment to the striking amendment was not adopted.

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Heavey moved that the following amendment to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale be adopted:On page 1, beginning on line 26 of the amendment, after "propose" strike all material through "amount." on line 31, and insert "both a tax rate and amount in dollars per year, and a statement as to whether the tax levy is permanent or effective only for a stated number of years. The maximum dollar amount levied each year shall not exceed the amount authorized, unless a different amount is authorized by the voters at a subsequent election."

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senator Heavey on page 1, beginning on line 26, to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale.

      The motion by Senator Heavey failed and the amendment to the striking amendment was not adopted on a rising vote.

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Heavey moved that the following amendment to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale be adopted:

       On page 2, line 2 of the amendment, strike "dollar" and insert "percentage"

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senator Heavey on page 2, line 2, to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale.

      The motion by Senator Heavey failed and the amendment to the striking amendment was not adopted.

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Heavey moved that the following amendment to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale be adopted:

       On page 2, line 14 of the amendment, after "a" insert "sixty percent"

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senator Heavey on page 2, line 14, to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale.

      The motion by Senator Heavey carried and the amendment to the striking amendment was adopted on a rising vote.

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Heavey moved that the following amendment to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale be adopted:

       On page 2, line 26 of the amendment, strike "thirty" and insert "ten"

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senator Heavey on page 2, line 26, to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale.

      The motion by Senator Heavey failed and the amendment to the striking amendment was not adopted.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Franklin, Senator Loveland was excused.

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Heavey moved that the following amendment to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale be adopted:

       On page 2, after line 27 of the amendment, insert the following:

       "(2) A nonprofit corporation or other public organization that contracts with the legislative authority of a city for the overall management and operation of a zoo, aquarium, or both under chapter . . ., Laws of 2000 (this act) must comply with chapters 42.23 and 42.30 RCW and RCW 42.17.250 through 42.17.348."

       Renumber the remaining subsections consecutively and correct internal references accordingly.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendment by Senator Heavey on page 2, line 27, to the striking amendment by Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale.

      The motion by Senator Heavey carried and the amendment to the striking amendment was adopted on a rising vote.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the striking amendment Senators Horn, Kohl-Welles, Patterson and Hale, as amended, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 6566.

      Debate ensued.

 

POINT OF INQUIRY

 

      Senator Goings: “Senator Kohl-Welles, I just want to make a point very clear. Senator, would you reiterate for me again, if this legislation, either the striker or the underlying legislation itself passes, would it affect Tacoma or the Tacoma Metropolitan Park District?”

      Senator Kohl-Welles: “It, in no way, affects Tacoma or Pierce County or any place in the entire state of Washington, except Seattle and Spokane.”

      Senator Goings: “Thank you.”

      The motion by Senator Horn carried and the striking amendment, as amended, was adopted.

 

MOTIONS

 

      On motion of Senator Horn, the following title amendment was adopted:

      On page 1, line 1 of the title, after "recreation;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 84.52.010; and adding a new chapter to Title 35 RCW."

      On motion of Senator Horn, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6566 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6566.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6566 and the bill failed to pass the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 22; Nays, 24; Absent, 0; Excused, 3.

      Voting yea: Senators Bauer, Brown, Costa, Eide, Finkbeiner, Fraser, Goings, Hale, Hochstatter, Horn, Jacobsen, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Long, McCaslin, McDonald, Oke, Patterson, Sheldon, B., Spanel, Swecker and Thibaudeau - 22.            Voting nay: Senators Benton, Deccio, Fairley, Franklin, Gardner, Haugen, Heavey, Honeyford, Johnson, McAuliffe, Morton, Prentice, Rasmussen, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan, Sheldon, T., Shin, Snyder, Stevens, West, Winsley, Wojahn and Zarelli - 24.            Excused: Senators Hargrove, Loveland and Sellar - 3.      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6566, having failed to receive the constitutional majority, was declared lost.

 

      There being no objection, the Senate resumed consideration of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231, which was deferred for the Special Order of Business. An amendment by Senators Finkbeiner and Tim Sheldon on page 7, line 39, was not adopted.

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Finkbeiner moved that the following amendments be considered simultaneously and be adopted:

       On page 10, line 11, after "property" insert ", tenants making telecommunications installations or performing telecommunications maintenance with the permission of the property owner,"

       On page 10, beginning on line 12, after "employer" strike all material through "lease" on line 13

      Debate ensued.

 

WITHDRAWAL OF AMENDMENTS

 

      There being no objection, Senator Finkbeiner withdrew the amendments on page 10, line 11, and page 10, beginning on line 12, to Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231.

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Finkbeiner moved that the following amendments be considered simultaneously and be adopted:

       On page 10, line 11, after "property" insert ", tenants making telecommunications installations or performing telecommunications maintenance with the permission of the property owner,"

       On page 10, beginning on line 12, after "employer" strike all material through "lease" on line 13.

       On page 15, line 34, after "residences" insert the following:

"and installations by individuals not required to obtain a telecommunications contractor license"

       On page 15, line 35, after "inspections" insert ", and the director shall not require permits or charge fees in connection with such installations"

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the amendments by Senator Finkbeiner on page 10, line 11, page 10, beginning on line 12, and page 15, lines 34 and 35, to Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231.

      The motion by Senator Finkbeiner carried and the amendments were adopted on a rising vote.

 

MOTION

 

      Senator Hochstatter moved that the following striking amendment be adopted:

       Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

       "Sec. 1. RCW 19.28.005 and 1993 c 275 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

       The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.

       (1) "Administrator" means a person designated by an electrical contractor to supervise electrical work and electricians in accordance with the rules adopted under this chapter.

       (2) "Board" means the electrical board under RCW 19.28.065.

       (3) "Chapter" means chapter 19.28 RCW.

       (4) "Department" means the department of labor and industries.

       (5) "Director" means the director of the department or the director's designee.

       (6) "Electrical construction trade" includes but is not limited to installing or maintaining electrical wires and equipment that are used for light, heat, or power and installing and maintaining remote control, signaling, power limited, or communication circuits or systems.

       (7) "Electrical contractor" means a person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity that offers to undertake, undertakes, submits a bid for, or does the work of installing or maintaining wires or equipment that convey electrical current.

       (8) "Equipment" means any equipment or apparatus that directly uses, conducts, or is operated by electricity but does not mean plug-in household appliances.

       (9) "Industrial control panel" means a factory-wired or user-wired assembly of industrial control equipment such as motor controllers, switches, relays, power supplies, computers, cathode ray tubes, transducers, and auxiliary devices. The panel may include disconnect means and motor branch circuit protective devices.

       (10) "Journeyman electrician" means a person who has been issued a journeyman electrician certificate of competency by the department.

       (11) "Specialty electrician" means a person who has been issued a specialty electrician certificate of competency by the department.

       (12) "Telecommunications backbone cabling systems" means a system that provides interconnections between telecommunications closets, equipment rooms, and entrance facilities in the telecommunications cabling system structure. Backbone cabling consists of the backbone cables, intermediate and main cross-connects, mechanical terminations, and patch cords or jumpers used for backbone to backbone cross-connection. Backbone cabling also includes cabling between buildings.

       (13) "Telecommunications closet" means a room for housing telecommunications equipment, cable terminations, and cross-connect wiring that serve that particular floor. The closet is the recognized transition point between the backbone and horizontal cabling systems.

       (14) "Telecommunications horizontal cabling systems" means the portions of the telecommunications cabling system that extends from the work area telecommunications outlet or connector to the telecommunications closet. The horizontal cabling includes the horizontal cables, the telecommunications outlet or connector in the work area, the mechanical termination, and horizontal cross-connections located in the telecommunications closet.

       (15) "Telecommunications structured cabling system" means the complete collective configuration of cabling and associated hardware at a given site and installed to perform specific telecommunications functions.

       (16) "Telecommunications systems" means structured cabling systems that begin at the demarcation point between the local service provider and the customer's premises structured cabling system.

       (a) Telecommunications systems encompass all forms of information generation, processing, and transporting of signals conveyed electronically or optically within or between buildings, including voice, data, video, and audio.

       (b) Telecommunications systems include structured cabling systems, compatible connecting hardware, telecommunications equipment, premises switching equipment, infrared, fiber optic, radio-frequency, and other limited-energy interconnections associated with telecommunications systems or appliances.

       (c) Telecommunications systems do not include horizontal cabling used for fire protection signaling systems, intrusion alarms, access control systems, patient monitoring systems, energy management control systems, industrial and automation control systems, HVAC/refrigeration control systems, lighting control systems, and stand-alone amplified sound or public address systems.

       (d) Telecommunications systems may interface with other building signal systems including security, alarms, and energy management at cross-connection junctions within telecommunications closets or at extended points of demarcation. Telecommunications systems do not include the installation or termination of premises line voltage service, feeder, or branch circuit conductors or equipment.

       Sec. 2. RCW 19.28.010 and 1993 c 275 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) All wires and equipment, and installations thereof, that convey electric current and installations of equipment to be operated by electric current, in, on, or about buildings or structures, except for noncomposite fiber optic cables, structured communications cabling, telephone, telegraph, radio, and television wires and equipment, and television antenna installations, signal strength amplifiers, and coaxial installations pertaining thereto shall be in strict conformity with this chapter, the statutes of the state of Washington, and the rules issued by the department, and shall be in conformity with approved methods of construction for safety to life and property. All wires and equipment that fall within section 90.2(b)(5) of the National Electrical Code, 1981 edition, are exempt from the requirements of this chapter. The regulations and articles in the National Electrical Code, the national electrical safety code, and other installation and safety regulations approved by the national fire protection association, as modified or supplemented by rules issued by the department in furtherance of safety to life and property under authority hereby granted, shall be prima facie evidence of the approved methods of construction. All materials, devices, appliances, and equipment used in such installations shall be of a type that conforms to applicable standards or be indicated as acceptable by the established standards of any electrical product testing laboratory which is accredited by the department. Industrial control panels, utilization equipment, and their components do not need to be listed, labeled, or otherwise indicated as acceptable by an accredited electrical product testing laboratory unless specifically required by the National Electrical Code, 1993 edition.

       (2) Residential buildings or structures moved into or within a county, city, or town are not required to comply with all of the requirements of this chapter, if the original occupancy classification of the building or structure is not changed as a result of the move. This subsection shall not apply to residential buildings or structures that are substantially remodeled or rehabilitated.

       (3) This chapter shall not limit the authority or power of any city or town to enact and enforce under authority given by law, any ordinance, rule, or regulation requiring an equal, higher, or better standard of construction and an equal, higher, or better standard of materials, devices, appliances, and equipment than that required by this chapter. A city or town shall require that its electrical inspectors meet the qualifications provided for state electrical inspectors in accordance with RCW 19.28.070. In a city or town having an equal, higher, or better standard the installations, materials, devices, appliances, and equipment shall be in accordance with the ordinance, rule, or regulation of the city or town. Electrical equipment associated with spas, hot tubs, swimming pools, and hydromassage bathtubs shall not be offered for sale or exchange unless the electrical equipment is certified as being in compliance with the applicable product safety standard by bearing the certification mark of an approved electrical products testing laboratory.

       (4) Nothing in this chapter may be construed as permitting the connection of any conductor of any electric circuit with a pipe that is connected with or designed to be connected with a waterworks piping system, without the consent of the person or persons legally responsible for the operation and maintenance of the waterworks piping system.

       Sec. 3. RCW 19.28.200 and 1998 c 98 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:

       (1) No license under the provision of this chapter shall be required from any utility or any person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity employed by a utility because of work in connection with the installation, repair, or maintenance of lines, wires, apparatus, or equipment owned by or under the control of a utility and used for transmission or distribution of electricity from the source of supply to the point of contact at the premises and/or property to be supplied and service connections and meters and other apparatus or appliances used in the measurement of the consumption of electricity by the customer.

       (2) No license under the provisions of this chapter shall be required from any utility because of work in connection with the installation, repair, or maintenance of the following:

       (a) Lines, wires, apparatus, or equipment used in the lighting of streets, alleys, ways, or public areas or squares;

       (b) Lines, wires, apparatus, or equipment owned by a commercial, industrial, or public institution customer that are an integral part of a transmission or distribution system, either overhead or underground, providing service to such customer and located outside the building or structure: PROVIDED, That a utility does not initiate the sale of services to perform such work;

       (c) Lines and wires, together with ancillary apparatus, and equipment, owned by a customer that is an independent power producer who has entered into an agreement for the sale of electricity to a utility and that are used in transmitting electricity from an electrical generating unit located on premises used by such customer to the point of interconnection with the utility's system.

       (3) Any person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity licensed under RCW 19.28.120 may enter into a contract with a utility for the performance of work under subsection (2) of this section.

       (4) No license under the provisions of this chapter shall be required from any person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity because of the work of installing and repairing ignition or lighting systems for motor vehicles.

       (5) No license under the provisions of this chapter shall be required from any person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity because of work in connection with the installation, repair, or maintenance of wires and equipment, and installations thereof, exempted in RCW 19.28.010.

       (6) The department may by rule exempt from licensing requirements under this chapter work performed on premanufactured electric power generation equipment assemblies and control gear involving the testing, repair, modification, maintenance, or installation of components internal to the power generation equipment, the control gear, or the transfer switch.

       (7) No license under the provisions of this chapter shall be required from any person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity because of work in connection with the installation, repair, maintenance, or testing of telecommunications systems. "Telecommunications systems" includes equipment and associated hardware, pathway systems, and cable management systems. It also includes installation of open wiring systems of telecommunications cables, surface nonmetallic raceways designated and used exclusively for telecommunications, optical fiber innerduct raceway, underground raceways designated and used exclusively for telecommunications and installed for additions or extensions to existing telecommunications systems not to exceed fifty feet inside the building, and incidental short sections of circular or surface metal raceway, not to exceed ten feet, for access or protection of telecommunications cabling and installation of cable trays and ladder racks in telecommunications service entrance rooms, spaces, or closets.

       Sec. 4. RCW 19.28.610 and 1998 c 98 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

       Nothing in RCW 19.28.510 through 19.28.620 shall be construed to require that a person obtain a license or a certified electrician in order to do electrical work at his or her residence or farm or place of business or on other property owned by him or her unless the electrical work is on the construction of a new building intended for rent, sale, or lease. However, if the construction is of a new residential building with up to four units intended for rent, sale, or lease, the owner may receive an exemption from the requirement to obtain a license or use a certified electrician if he or she provides a signed affidavit to the department stating that he or she will be performing the work and will occupy one of the units as his or her principal residence. The owner shall apply to the department for this exemption and may only receive an exemption once every twenty-four months. It is intended that the owner receiving this exemption shall occupy the unit as his or her principal residence for twenty-four months after completion of the units. Nothing in RCW 19.28.510 through 19.28.620 shall be intended to derogate from or dispense with the requirements of any valid electrical code enacted by a city or town pursuant to RCW 19.28.010(3), except that no code shall require the holder of a certificate of competency to demonstrate any additional proof of competency or obtain any other license or pay any fee in order to engage in the electrical construction trade. RCW 19.28.510 through 19.28.620 shall not apply to common carriers subject to Part I of the Interstate Commerce Act, nor to their officers and employees. Nothing in RCW 19.28.510 through 19.28.620 shall be deemed to apply to the installation or maintenance of telephone, telegraph, radio, or television wires and equipment; nor to any electrical utility or its employees in the installation, repair, and maintenance of electrical wiring, circuits, and equipment by or for the utility, or comprising a part of its plants, lines or systems. The licensing provisions of RCW 19.28.510 through 19.28.620 shall not apply to:

       (1) Persons making electrical installations on their own property or to regularly employed employees working on the premises of their employer, unless the electrical work is on the construction of a new building intended for rent, sale, or lease;

       (2) Employees of an employer while the employer is performing utility type work of the nature described in RCW 19.28.200 so long as such employees have registered in the state of Washington with or graduated from a state-approved outside lineman apprenticeship course that is recognized by the department and that qualifies a person to perform such work; ((or))

       (3) Any work exempted under RCW 19.28.200(6); or

       (4) Persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, or other entities engaged in the installation, repair, or maintenance of telecommunications systems.

       Nothing in RCW 19.28.510 through 19.28.620 shall be construed to restrict the right of any householder to assist or receive assistance from a friend, neighbor, relative or other person when none of the individuals doing the electrical installation hold themselves out as engaged in the trade or business of electrical installations. Nothing precludes any person who is exempt from the licensing requirements of this chapter under this section from obtaining a journeyman or specialty certificate of competency if they otherwise meet the requirements of this chapter."

      Debate ensued.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the striking amendment by Senator Hochstatter to Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231.

      The motion by Senator Hochstatter failed and the striking amendment was not adopted on a rising vote.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Fairley, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

 

POINT OF ORDER

 

      Senator Rossi: “Mr. President, I rise to a point of order; and a point of inquiry. Section 210 of Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231 requires that the Director of the Department of Labor and Industries charge a new fee for the inspection of certain installed telecommunications systems. I submit that this fee would constitute a ‘tax’ for the purposes of section 2(1) of I-695. For support for this interpretation, I would respectfully direct the President to page 8 of a memorandum from Solicitor General Narda Pierce to all Assistant Attorneys Generals, dated December 22, 1999. Section 2(1) of I-695 requires that ‘any tax increase imposed by the state shall require voter approval.’

      “Mr. President, on February 11, in response to a point of inquiry concerning the number of votes necessary to pass Senate Bill No. 6515 in light of I-695, you noted as follows: ‘The President need not rule at this time whether the absence of a referendum clause on a measure which does impose a tax constitutes an amendment to I-695, requiring a two-thirds vote under Article 2, Section 19 of the State Constitution.’ Mr. President, the time has come for such a ruling. Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231 does impose a tax, and does not contain a referendum clause.

      “Mr. President, my point of order: Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231 does not contain a referendum clause in violation of section 2(1) of I-695. As such, the measure should be set down.

      “Mr. President, my contingent point of order is on the number of votes necessary to pass Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231. If you decline to rule that Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231 requires a referendum clause, then I submit that because the measure does not contain a referendum clause, it effectively amends I-695. Under Article 2, section 1 of the State Constitution, I respectfully submit that the passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231 would therefore require a two-thirds majority vote.”

      Debate ensued.

 

REPLY BY THE PRESIDENT

 

      President Owen: “The President is not prepared to rule at this time. He is going to need some time to review the citing.”

  

MOTION

 

      At 6:20 p.m., on motion of Senator Betti Sheldon, the Senate was declared to be at ease.

 

       The Senate was called to order at 7:18 p.m. by President Owen.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Honeyford, Senators Benton, Deccio, Finkbeiner, Hale, Horn, Johnson, Long, McCaslin, McDonald, Oke, Stevens, Swecker, Winsley and Zarelli were excused.

 

MOTION

 

      On motion of Senator Franklin, Senators Bauer, Eide, Gardner, Jacobsen, Patterson, Prentice and Tim Sheldon were excused.

      There being not objection, the Senate resumed consideration of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231.

 

RULING BY THE PRESIDENT

 

      President Owen: “In ruling upon the point of order by Senator Rossi concerning Engrossed Substitute Senate No. 6231, the President finds in accordance with prior rulings, first, that the question of whether or not a referendum is required is not in order, and, second, that the measure is not an amendment to Initiative 695, because it does not change any provision of the initiative. Therefore, a simple majority vote is required to pass the measure.”

 

DEMAND FOR THE PREVIOUS QUESTION

 

      Senators Snyder, Spanel and Betti Sheldon demanded the previous question and the demand was sustained.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be shall the main question be now put.

      The demand for the previous question carried.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the roll call on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231.

 

ROLL CALL

 

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill No. 6231 and the bill failed to pass the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 19; Nays, 6; Absent, 0; Excused, 24.

     Voting yea: Senators Brown, Costa, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Goings, Haugen, Heavey, Honeyford, Kline, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, Rasmussen, Sheldon, B., Shin, Snyder, Spanel, Thibaudeau and Wojahn - 19.

     Voting nay: Senators Hochstatter, Morton, Roach, Rossi, Sheahan and West - 6.

     Excused: Senators Bauer, Benton, Deccio, Eide, Finkbeiner, Gardner, Hale, Hargrove, Horn, Jacobsen, Johnson, Long, Loveland, McCaslin, McDonald, Oke, Patterson, Prentice, Sellar, Sheldon, T., Stevens, Swecker, Winsley and Zarelli - 24.

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6231, having failed to receive the constitutional majority, was declared lost.

 

MOTION

 

      At 7:22 p.m., on motion of Senator Betti Sheldon, the Senate adjourned until 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, February 16, 2000.

 

BRAD OWEN, President of the Senate

 

TONY M. COOK, Secretary of the Senate