FIFTY NINTH LEGISLATURE - REGULAR SESSION





SIXTY SIXTH DAY





House Chamber, Olympia, Wednesday, March 16, 2005


       The House was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by the Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding). The Clerk called the roll and a quorum was present.


       The flag was escorted to the rostrum by a Sergeant at Arms Color Guard, Pages Natasha Borromeo and Shanell Borromeo. The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) led the Chamber in the Pledge of Allegiance. Prayer was offered by Reverend Dennis Magnuson, Light of the Hill United Methodist Church, Puyallup.


       Reading of the Journal of the previous day was dispensed with and it was ordered to stand approved.


{{33919}}                      MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE


March 15, 2005

Mr. Speaker:


       The Senate has passed:

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5069,

ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 5160,

SENATE BILL NO. 5168,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5234,

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5285,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5385,

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5432,

SENATE BILL NO. 5484,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5535,

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5663,

ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5773,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5802,

SENATE BILL NO. 5857,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6078,

{{34081}}and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary


       There being no objection, the House advanced to the sixth order of business.


{{33920}}                                  SECOND READING


{{33921}}       HOUSE BILL NO. 1484, By Representatives Hunter, Jarrett, Haigh, Tom, McDermott, McIntire, Simpson, P. Sullivan, Kagi and Chase


       Authorizing voter approved regular property tax levies for school purposes.


       The bill was read the second time.



       Representative McIntire moved that Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484 be substituted for House Bill No. 1484 and the second substitute bill be placed on the second reading calendar. The motion was adopted.


       SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1484 was read the second time.


{{33922}}       With the consent of the House, amendment (363) was withdrawn.


       Representative Clements moved the adoption of amendment (189):


        On page 1, beginning on line 5, strike all of section 1 and insert the following:


        "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. In accordance with the court decisions known as School Funding I and School Funding II, which established the legal principles governing the state's school funding system in conformance with Article IX, sections 1 and 2 of the state Constitution, it is the intent of the legislature that any revenues from the property tax levy authorized under section 2 of this act be used by school districts solely to enrich programs outside of the legislative definition of basic education and not to reduce the state's obligation to fund basic education."


       Representative Clements spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


       Representative Hunter spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


{{33923}}       An electronic roll call vote was demanded and the demand was sustained.


MOTION


       On motion of Representative Clements, Representatives Buck, Campbell and Curtis were excused.


       The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of amendment (189) to Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484.


ROLL CALL


       The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of amendment (189) to Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 37, Nays - 58, Absent - 0, Excused - 3.

       Voting yea: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Armstrong, Bailey, Buri, Chandler, Clements, Condotta, Cox, Crouse, DeBolt, Dunn, Ericksen, Haler, Hankins, Hinkle, Holmquist, Kretz, Kristiansen, McCune, McDonald, Newhouse, Orcutt, Pearson, Priest, Roach, Rodne, Schindler, Serben, Shabro, Skinner, Strow, Sump, Talcott, Walsh and Woods - 37.

       Voting nay: Representatives Appleton, Blake, Chase, Clibborn, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Ericks, Flannigan, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Hasegawa, Hudgins, Hunt, Hunter, Jarrett, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kilmer, Kirby, Lantz, Linville, Lovick, McCoy, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Moeller, Morrell, Morris, Murray, Nixon, O'Brien, Ormsby, Pettigrew, Quall, Roberts, Santos, Schual-Berke, Sells, Simpson, Sommers, Springer, B. Sullivan, P. Sullivan, Takko, Tom, Upthegrove, Wallace, Williams, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 58.

       Excused: Representatives Buck, Campbell and Curtis - 3.


{{33924}}       Representative Orcutt moved the adoption of amendment (201):


        On page 1, line 16, strike "students" and insert "districts"


       Representatives Orcutt, Orcutt (again) and Talcott spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


       Representative Hunter spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


{{33925}}       An electronic roll call vote was demanded and the demand was sustained.


       The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of amendment (201) to Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484.


ROLL CALL


       The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of amendment (201) to Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 41, Nays - 54, Absent - 0, Excused - 3.

       Voting yea: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Armstrong, Bailey, Blake, Buri, Chandler, Clements, Condotta, Cox, Crouse, Dunn, Ericksen, Green, Haler, Hankins, Hinkle, Holmquist, Kilmer, Kretz, Kristiansen, McCune, McDonald, Morrell, Newhouse, Nixon, Orcutt, Pearson, Priest, Roach, Rodne, Schindler, Serben, Shabro, Skinner, Strow, Sump, Talcott, Walsh and Woods - 41.

       Voting nay: Representatives Appleton, Chase, Clibborn, Cody, Conway, Darneille, DeBolt, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Ericks, Flannigan, Fromhold, Grant, Haigh, Hasegawa, Hudgins, Hunt, Hunter, Jarrett, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kirby, Lantz, Linville, Lovick, McCoy, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Moeller, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ormsby, Pettigrew, Quall, Roberts, Santos, Schual-Berke, Sells, Simpson, Sommers, Springer, B. Sullivan, P. Sullivan, Takko, Tom, Upthegrove, Wallace, Williams, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 54.

       Excused: Representatives Buck, Campbell and Curtis - 3.


{{33926}}       Representative Hunter moved the adoption of amendment (374):


        On page 2, line 9, after "bargaining." insert "For certificated instructional staff, the supplements shall be provided in the form of separate contracts for additional time, additional responsibility, or incentive, pursuant to RCW 28A.400.200(4)."


        On page 5, beginning on line 21, strike all of section 6


        Correct the title.


       Representative Talcott moved the adoption of amendment (375) to amendment (374):


        On page 1, line 4 of the amendment, after "RCW 28A.400.200(4)." insert "The supplements shall be provided only for additional staff time and responsibilities specified in supplemental contracts, and supplements may not be provided as across-the-board salary adjustments."


       Representative Talcott spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment to the amendment.


       Representative Hunter spoke against the adoption of the amendment to the amendment.


{{33927}}       An electronic roll call vote was demanded and the demand was sustained.


       The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of amendment (375) to amendment (374) to Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484.


ROLL CALL


       The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of amendment (375) to amendment (374) to Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 40, Nays - 55, Absent - 0, Excused - 3.

       Voting yea: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Armstrong, Bailey, Buri, Chandler, Clements, Condotta, Cox, Crouse, DeBolt, Dunn, Ericksen, Haler, Hankins, Hinkle, Holmquist, Kretz, Kristiansen, McCune, McDonald, Newhouse, Nixon, Orcutt, Pearson, Priest, Quall, Roach, Rodne, Schindler, Serben, Shabro, Skinner, Strow, Sullivan, P., Sump, Talcott, Walsh and Woods - 40.

       Voting nay: Representatives Appleton, Blake, Chase, Clibborn, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Ericks, Flannigan, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Hasegawa, Hudgins, Hunt, Hunter, Jarrett, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kilmer, Kirby, Lantz, Linville, Lovick, McCoy, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Moeller, Morrell, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ormsby, Pettigrew, Roberts, Santos, Schual-Berke, Sells, Simpson, Sommers, Springer, Sullivan, B., Takko, Tom, Upthegrove, Wallace, Williams, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 55.

       Excused: Representatives Buck, Campbell and Curtis - 3.


{{33928}}       The question before the House was adoption of amendment (374).


       Representative Hunter spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


       Representative Talcott spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


       The amendment was adopted.


{{33929}}       With the consent of the House, amendment (215) was withdrawn.


{{33930}}       Representative Orcutt moved the adoption of amendment (202):


        On page 3, beginning on line 7, strike all of subsection (7)


        On page 5, beginning on line 1, strike all of section 5


        Renumber the remaining section consecutively, correct any internal references accordingly, and correct the title.


       Representative Orcutt spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


       Representative Hunter spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


{{33931}}       An electronic roll call vote was demanded and the demand was sustained.


       The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of amendment (202) to Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484.


ROLL CALL


       The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of amendment (202) to Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 39, Nays - 56, Absent - 0, Excused - 3.

       Voting yea: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Armstrong, Bailey, Buri, Chandler, Clements, Condotta, Cox, Crouse, DeBolt, Dunn, Ericksen, Green, Haler, Hankins, Hinkle, Holmquist, Kretz, Kristiansen, McCune, McDonald, Newhouse, Nixon, Orcutt, Pearson, Priest, Roach, Rodne, Schindler, Serben, Shabro, Skinner, Strow, Sump, Talcott, Walsh and Woods - 39.

       Voting nay: Representatives Appleton, Blake, Chase, Clibborn, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Ericks, Flannigan, Fromhold, Grant, Haigh, Hasegawa, Hudgins, Hunt, Hunter, Jarrett, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kilmer, Kirby, Lantz, Linville, Lovick, McCoy, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Moeller, Morrell, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ormsby, Pettigrew, Quall, Roberts, Santos, Schual-Berke, Sells, Simpson, Sommers, Springer, B. Sullivan, P. Sullivan, Takko, Tom, Upthegrove, Wallace, Williams, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 56.

       Excused: Representatives Buck, Campbell and Curtis - 3.


{{33932}}       Representative Cox moved the adoption of amendment (216):


         Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:


        "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. It is the intent of the legislature that additional funding provided under section 2 of this act be distributed to school districts to provide additional resources to improve student learning.


        NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 84.52 RCW to read as follows:

        (1) In addition to the levy provided for in RCW 84.52.065, in each year, subject to voter approval, the state may levy, for collection in the following year, a state school tax of up to seventy-five cents per thousand dollars of assessed value upon the assessed valuation of all taxable property within the state adjusted to the state equalized value in accordance with the indicated ratio fixed by the state department of revenue.

        (2) The taxes levied by the state under this section shall be deposited into the student achievement account hereby created in the state treasury. Money in the student achievement account shall be distributed to school districts based on the number of full-time equivalent students in the districts and shall be spent for school district purposes.

        (3) At the request of the superintendent of public instruction, the secretary of state shall submit the levy request to the voters at the next general election. The levy shall be approved by a majority of the voters voting in the election. The levy may last up to four years, but must then be resubmitted to the voters for their approval.


        NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 70.44 RCW to read as follows:

        (1) Beginning in calendar year 2006 and every year thereafter, the state treasurer shall distribute, based on calculations by the superintendent of public instruction, from the student achievement account to school districts, the amount of taxes collected by the state levy in calendar year 2005 as follows:

        (a) On June 1st, the state treasurer shall distribute fifty-five percent of the amount of taxes collected in calendar year 2005.

        (b) On December 1st, the state treasurer shall distribute forty-five percent of the amount of taxes collected in calendar year 2005.

        (2) For calendar years beginning in 2007, the distributions under subsection (1) of this section shall equal the distributions from the previous year increased by the increase in the state property tax levy under section 1 of this act from the previous year.

        (3) The funding shall be distributed to school districts based on the number of full-time equivalent students enrolled in the district.


        NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. A new section is added to chapter 84.55 RCW to read as follows:

        The first levy by the state under section 2 of this act is not subject to RCW 84.55.010.


        Sec. 5. RCW 29A.36.210 and 2004 c 80 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

        (1) The ballot proposition authorizing a taxing district to impose the regular property tax levies authorized in RCW 36.69.145, 67.38.130, 84.52.069, or 84.52.135 shall contain in substance the following:


        "Shall the . . . . . . (insert the name of the taxing district) be authorized to impose regular property tax levies of . . . . . . (insert the maximum rate) or less per thousand dollars of assessed valuation for each of . . . . . . (insert the maximum number of years allowable) consecutive years?

        Yes . . . . . . . . . . . .□

        No . . . . . . . . . . . .□"

        Each voter shall indicate either "Yes" or "No" on his or her ballot in accordance with the procedures established under this title.


        (2) The ballot proposition authorizing a taxing district to impose a permanent regular tax levy under RCW 84.52.069 or section 2 of this act shall contain the following:


        "Shall the . . . . . (insert the name of the taxing district) be authorized to impose a PERMANENT regular property levy of . . . . . (insert the maximum rate) or less per thousand dollars of assessed valuation?

        Yes . . . . . . . . . . . .□

        No  . . . . . . . . . . . .□"


        Sec. 6. RCW 84.52.043 and 2004 c 80 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:

        Within and subject to the limitations imposed by RCW 84.52.050 as amended, the regular ad valorem tax levies upon real and personal property by the taxing districts hereafter named shall be as follows:

        (1) Levies of the senior taxing districts shall be as follows: (a) The levy by the state shall not exceed three dollars and sixty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value adjusted to the state equalized value in accordance with the indicated ratio fixed by the state department of revenue to be used exclusively for the support of the common schools, including the levy for a state school tax under section two of this act; (b) the levy by any county shall not exceed one dollar and eighty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value; (c) the levy by any road district shall not exceed two dollars and twenty-five cents per thousand dollars of assessed value; and (d) the levy by any city or town shall not exceed three dollars and thirty-seven and one-half cents per thousand dollars of assessed value. However any county is hereby authorized to increase its levy from one dollar and eighty cents to a rate not to exceed two dollars and forty-seven and one-half cents per thousand dollars of assessed value for general county purposes if the total levies for both the county and any road district within the county do not exceed four dollars and five cents per thousand dollars of assessed value, and no other taxing district has its levy reduced as a result of the increased county levy.

        (2) The aggregate levies of junior taxing districts and senior taxing districts, other than the state, shall not exceed five dollars and ninety cents per thousand dollars of assessed valuation. The term "junior taxing districts" includes all taxing districts other than the state, counties, road districts, cities, towns, port districts, and public utility districts. The limitations provided in this subsection shall not apply to: (a) Levies at the rates provided by existing law by or for any port or public utility district; (b) excess property tax levies authorized in Article VII, section 2 of the state Constitution; (c) levies for acquiring conservation futures as authorized under RCW 84.34.230; (d) levies for emergency medical care or emergency medical services imposed under RCW 84.52.069; (e) levies to finance affordable housing for very low-income housing imposed under RCW 84.52.105; (f) the portions of levies by metropolitan park districts that are protected under RCW 84.52.120; (g) levies imposed by ferry districts under RCW 36.54.130; and (h) levies for criminal justice purposes under RCW 84.52.135.


        Sec. 7. RCW 84.55.005 and 2002 c 1 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

        As used in this chapter:

        (1) "Inflation" means the percentage change in the implicit price deflator for personal consumption expenditures for the United States as published for the most recent twelve-month period by the bureau of economic analysis of the federal department of commerce in September of the year before the taxes are payable;

        (2) "Limit factor" means:

        (a) For taxing districts with a population of less than ten thousand in the calendar year prior to the assessment year, one hundred one percent;

        (b) For taxing districts for which a limit factor is authorized under RCW 84.55.0101, the lesser of the limit factor under that section or one hundred one percent;

        (c) For all other districts, the lesser of one hundred one percent or one hundred percent plus inflation; and

        (3) "Regular property taxes" has the meaning given it in RCW 84.04.140, except does not include tax levies under section 2 of this act."

        Correct the title.


POINT OF ORDER


       Representative Hunt requested a scope and object ruling on amendment (216) to Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484.


{{33934}}                                SPEAKER'S RULING


       Mr. Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding): "Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484 is entitled an act relating to 'county property tax levies for school purposes'. The bill authorizes a voter-approved county property tax to use for cost-of-living supplements for school employees.

       The amendment authorizes a voter-approved state property tax levy. The amendment is therefore outside the scope and object of the bill.

       Representative Hunt, your point of order is well taken."


{{33935}}       The bill was ordered engrossed.


{{33936}}       There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


       Representatives Hunter, Fromhold, Schual-Berke, Springer and Santos spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


       Representatives Orcutt, Armstrong, Talcott, Rodne, DeBolt, Ahern, Shabro and Clements spoke against the passage of the bill.


       The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) stated the question before the House to be the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484.


ROLL CALL


       The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1484 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 50, Nays - 46, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

       Voting yea: Representatives Appleton, Chase, Clibborn, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dickerson, Dunshee, Ericks, Flannigan, Fromhold, Green, Hasegawa, Hudgins, Hunt, Hunter, Jarrett, Kagi, Kenney, Kirby, Lovick, McCoy, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Moeller, Morrell, Morris, Murray, Nixon, O'Brien, Ormsby, Pettigrew, Priest, Quall, Roberts, Santos, Schual-Berke, Sells, Simpson, Sommers, Springer, B. Sullivan, P. Sullivan, Tom, Upthegrove, Wallace, Williams, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 50.

       Voting nay: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Armstrong, Bailey, Blake, Buri, Campbell, Chandler, Clements, Condotta, Cox, Crouse, DeBolt, Dunn, Eickmeyer, Ericksen, Grant, Haigh, Haler, Hankins, Hinkle, Holmquist, Kessler, Kilmer, Kretz, Kristiansen, Lantz, Linville, McCune, McDonald, Newhouse, Orcutt, Pearson, Roach, Rodne, Schindler, Serben, Shabro, Skinner, Strow, Sump, Takko, Talcott, Walsh and Woods - 46.

       Excused: Representatives Buck and Curtis - 2.


       ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1484, having received the necessary constitutional majority, was declared passed.


{{34082}}                      MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

March 16, 2005

Mr. Speaker:


       The Senate has passed:

SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5041,

SENATE BILL NO. 5136,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5145,

ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 5222,

SENATE BILL NO. 5589,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5602,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5644,

SENATE BILL NO. 5713,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5838,

SENATE BILL NO. 5898,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 5999,

SENATE BILL NO. 6033,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6037,

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL NO. 6064,

and the same are herewith transmitted.

Thomas Hoemann, Secretary


SECOND READING


{{33939}}       HOUSE BILL NO. 1510, By Representatives Morris, Quall, B. Sullivan and Chase


       Modifying the property taxation of nonprofit entities.


       The bill was read the second time.


       On motion of Representative McIntire, Substitute House Bill No. 1510 was substituted for House Bill No. 1510 and the substitute bill was placed on the second reading calendar.


       SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1510 was read the second time.


{{33940}}       There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


       Representatives Morris and Orcutt spoke in favor of passage of the bill.



       The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) stated the question before the House to be the final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1510.


ROLL CALL


       The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1510 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 96, Nays - 0, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

       Voting yea: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Appleton, Armstrong, Bailey, Blake, Buri, Campbell, Chandler, Chase, Clements, Clibborn, Cody, Condotta, Conway, Cox, Crouse, Darneille, DeBolt, Dickerson, Dunn, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Ericks, Ericksen, Flannigan, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Haler, Hankins, Hasegawa, Hinkle, Holmquist, Hudgins, Hunt, Hunter, Jarrett, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kilmer, Kirby, Kretz, Kristiansen, Lantz, Linville, Lovick, McCoy, McCune, McDermott, McDonald, McIntire, Miloscia, Moeller, Morrell, Morris, Murray, Newhouse, Nixon, O'Brien, Orcutt, Ormsby, Pearson, Pettigrew, Priest, Quall, Roach, Roberts, Rodne, Santos, Schindler, Schual-Berke, Sells, Serben, Shabro, Simpson, Skinner, Sommers, Springer, Strow, B. Sullivan, P. Sullivan, Sump, Takko, Talcott, Tom, Upthegrove, Wallace, Walsh, Williams, Wood, Woods, and Mr. Speaker - 96.

       Excused: Representatives Buck and Curtis - 2.


       SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1510, having received the necessary constitutional majority, was declared passed.


{{33941}}        HOUSE BILL NO. 2257, By Representatives Williams, Conway, Morrell and Wood


       Requiring state contracts to be in the state's best interests.


       The bill was read the second time. There being no objection, Second Substitute House Bill No. 2257 was not substituted for House Bill No. 2257.


       With the consent of the House, amendments (368) and (231) were withdrawn.


{{33942}}       Representative Sommers moved the adoption of amendment (369):


        Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:


        "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. It is essential that the legislature and state agencies spend tax dollars in a manner that is both responsible and consistent with the best interests of the state and the nation. The legislature and state agencies should, therefore, consider indirect benefits that may be achieved when entering into state contracts for goods and services. Such benefits include, but are not limited to, job creation, capital investment, and economic stimulus. Additionally, such benefits include greater protection of privacy interests, less risk of disclosure of personal information, and avoidance of undue risk.


        NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 39.29 RCW to read as follows:

        The office of financial management, in consultation with representatives of state agency management, business, labor, and agricultural groups, shall develop and implement procurement policies and procedures necessary to determine whether civil service contracts and contracts for public works, personal services, purchased services, information services, highway design and construction, and materials, supplies, and equipment, and any subcontracts awarded under such contracts, are in the best interests of Washington state, its residents, and its economy. These procurement policies and procedures shall require consideration of the following when making decisions to enter into contracts:

        (1) The extent to which the contract, or any subcontract awarded under the contract, will be performed at a location outside the United States;

        (2) The extent to which international trade agreements apply to the contract, or any subcontract awarded under the contract;

        (3) The extent to which awarding the contract to a Washington business will result in job creation or retention or other economic benefits to Washington, its residents, and its economy; and

        (4) The extent to which the contract, or any subcontract awarded under the contract, involves solicitation or disclosure of personal information.


        NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 39.29 RCW to read as follows:

        The office of financial management, in consultation with representatives of state agency management, business, labor, and agricultural groups, shall conduct a study of the indirect benefits of adopting procurement policies giving Washington businesses a price preference when determining the lowest responsible bidder on civil service contracts and contracts for public works, personal services, purchased services, information services, highway design and construction, and materials, supplies, and equipment. These benefits shall include, but are not limited to, job creation and retention, capital investment, state and local tax revenue, and economic stimulus. The office of financial management shall report its findings, and any recommendations for legislation adopting procurement policies giving Washington businesses a price preference, to the legislature by December 1, 2005."


        Correct the title.


       Representative Anderson moved the adoption of amendment (372) to amendment (369):


        On page 2 of the striking amendment, line 5, after "economy;" strike "and"


        On page 2 of the striking amendment, line 6, after "(4)" insert the following:


        "The extent to which decisions to locate research, development, production, and other facilities in Washington by businesses based in other countries and other states has resulted in job creation and other economic benefits to Washington, its residents, and its economy; and

        (5)"


       Representatives Anderson and Conway spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment to the amendment.


       The amendment to the amendment was adopted.


       Representative Clements moved the adoption of amendment (378) to amendment (369):



        On page 2 of the striking amendment, line 5, after "economy;" strike "and"


        On page 2 of the striking amendment, line 6, after "(4)" insert the following:


        "The extent to which the requirement that prevailing wage rates be paid on public works projects increases construction costs, and whether a benefit-cost analysis shows that the benefits, if any, of such a requirement outweigh the increased construction costs; and

        (5)"


       Representative Clements spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment to the amendment.


       Representative Conway spoke against the adoption of the amendment to the amendment.


       The amendment to the amendment was not adopted.


       The question before the House was adoption of amendment (369) as amended.


       Representative Sommers spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment as amended.


       The amendment as amended was adopted. The bill was ordered engrossed.


{{33944}}       There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


       Representatives Williams and Conway spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


       Representatives Condotta, Clements and Serben spoke against the passage of the bill.


       The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) stated the question before the House to be the final passage of Engrossed House Bill No. 2257.


ROLL CALL


       The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed House Bill No. 2257 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 61, Nays - 35, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

       Voting yea: Representatives Appleton, Blake, Buri, Campbell, Chase, Clibborn, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Ericks, Flannigan, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Haler, Hasegawa, Hudgins, Hunt, Jarrett, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kilmer, Kirby, Lantz, Linville, Lovick, McCoy, McCune, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Moeller, Morrell, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ormsby, Pettigrew, Priest, Quall, Roberts, Santos, Schual-Berke, Sells, Simpson, Sommers, Springer, Strow, B. Sullivan, P. Sullivan, Takko, Upthegrove, Wallace, Williams, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 61.

       Voting nay: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Armstrong, Bailey, Chandler, Clements, Condotta, Cox, Crouse, DeBolt, Dunn, Ericksen, Hankins, Hinkle, Holmquist, Hunter, Kretz, Kristiansen, McDonald, Newhouse, Nixon, Orcutt, Pearson, Roach, Rodne, Schindler, Serben, Shabro, Skinner, Sump, Talcott, Tom, Walsh and Woods - 35.

       Excused: Representatives Buck and Curtis - 2.


       ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO. 2257, having received the necessary constitutional majority, was declared passed.


{{33945}}       HOUSE BILL NO. 1397, By Representatives Murray, Jarrett, Morris, B. Sullivan, Anderson, Appleton, Wallace, P. Sullivan, Kenney, Campbell, Rodne, Hunt, Priest, Springer, Tom, Lovick, Quall, Pettigrew, Kirby, Clibborn, Kilmer, Dunshee, Dickerson, Ericks, Green, Sells, Hasegawa, Upthegrove, Williams, Moeller, McIntire, Chase, Simpson, McDermott, Hudgins and Wood


       Changing vehicle emission standards provisions.


       The bill was read the second time.


       Representative Murray moved that Substitute House Bill No. 1397 be substituted for House Bill No. 1397 and the substitute bill be placed on the second reading calendar. The motion was adopted.


       SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1397 was read the second time.


{{33946}}       With the consent of the House, amendments (050) and (049) were withdrawn.


       Representative Woods moved the adoption of amendment (291):


        On page 2, after line 25, strike section 2 and insert the following:


        "NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. (1) Pursuant to the federal clean air act, the legislature adopts the California motor vehicle emission standards for emissions of smog-forming pollutants in Title 13 section 1961 of the California Code of Regulations, effective January 1, 2005. By December 31, 2005, the department of ecology shall adopt rules to implement the Title 13 section 1961 emission standards of the state of California for passenger cars, light duty trucks, and medium duty passenger vehicles. The department of ecology shall not adopt rules to implement vehicle emissions standards for emissions of green house gases. The rules shall be applicable to motor vehicles with a model year 2009 and later. This section does not limit the department of ecology's authority to regulate motor vehicle emissions for any other class of vehicle."


       Representative Rodne spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


       Representative Murray spoke against the adoption of the amendment.



{{33947}}       An electronic roll call vote was demanded and the demand was sustained.


       The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of amendment (291) to Substitute House Bill No. 1397.


ROLL CALL


       The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of amendment (291) to Substitute House Bill No. 1397, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 42, Nays - 54, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

       Voting yea: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Armstrong, Bailey, Buri, Campbell, Chandler, Chase, Clements, Condotta, Cox, Crouse, DeBolt, Dunn, Ericksen, Haler, Hankins, Hinkle, Holmquist, Jarrett, Kretz, Kristiansen, McCune, McDonald, Miloscia, Newhouse, Nixon, Orcutt, Pearson, Priest, Roach, Rodne, Schindler, Serben, Shabro, Skinner, Strow, Sump, Talcott, Tom and Woods - 42.

       Voting nay: Representatives Appleton, Blake, Clibborn, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Ericks, Flannigan, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Hasegawa, Hudgins, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kilmer, Kirby, Lantz, Linville, Lovick, McCoy, McDermott, McIntire, Moeller, Morrell, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ormsby, Pettigrew, Quall, Roberts, Santos, Schual-Berke, Sells, Simpson, Sommers, Springer, B. Sullivan, P. Sullivan, Takko, Upthegrove, Wallace, Walsh, Williams, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 54.

       Excused: Representatives Buck and Curtis - 2.


{{33948}}       Representative Ericksen moved the adoption of amendment (290):


       On page 2, beginning on line 26, strike all of section 2


       On page 6, beginning on line 6, strike all of section 5


       On page 6, beginning on line 18, strike all of sections 7, 8, and 9


       On page 2, after line 25, insert the following:

       "NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. The state auditor shall study the federal and California emissions standards, evaluating the costs to consumers, costs to state government, ability of manufacturers to comply with the newest emissions requirements, and the benefits to air quality. The report shall include recommendations regarding whether Washington state should adopt the California emissions standards. The state auditor shall report its findings and recommendations to the appropriate committees of the legislature by December 31, 2005."


       Renumber the remaining sections consecutively and correct internal references. Correct the title.


       Representatives Ericksen and Sump spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


       Representatives Murray and McIntire spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


       The amendment was not adopted.


{{33949}}       Representative Nixon moved the adoption of amendment (345):





        On page 2, line 27, after "standards" insert "as set forth in section 7 of this act and"


        On page 2, line 28, after "Regulations" strike ","


        On page 2, line 30, after "implement" insert "section 7 of this act and"


        On page 2, line 32, after "vehicles" strike all material through "act)" on line 34


        On page 6, after line 17, insert the following:


        "NEW SECTION. Sec. 7.

Title 13, California Code of Regulations

1900. Definitions.


        (a)   The definitions in this section supplement and are governed by the definitions set forth in chapter 2 (commencing with section 39010), part 1, division 26 of the Health and Safety Code. The definitions set forth in the applicable model-year new vehicle certification and assembly-line test procedures adopted in this chapter are hereby incorporated by reference.

        (b)   In addition to the definitions incorporated under subdivision (a), the following definitions shall govern the provisions of this chapter.

 

[Definitions applicable only to warranty or recall provisions not in this compilation are not set forth]


        (4) "Gaseous fuels" means any liquefied petroleum gas, liquefied natural gas, or compressed natural gas fuels for use in motor vehicles.

        (5) "Heavy-duty engine" means an engine which is used to propel a heavy-duty vehicle.

        (6) "Heavy-duty vehicle" means any motor vehicle having a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating greater than 6,000 pounds, except passenger cars.

* * * *

        (8) "Light-duty truck" means any 2000 and subsequent model motor vehicle certified to the standards in section 1961(a)(1) rated at 8,500 pounds gross vehicle weight or less, and any other motor vehicle rated at 6,000 pounds gross vehicle weight or less, which is designed primarily for purposes of transportation of property or is a derivative of such a vehicle, or is available with special features enabling off-street or off-highway operation and use.

        (9) "Medium-duty vehicle" means any pre-1995 model year heavy-duty vehicle having a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating of 8,500 pounds or less; any 1992 through 2006 model-year heavy-duty low-emission, ultra-low-emission, super-ultra-low-emission or zero-emission vehicle certified to the standards in section 1960.1(h)(2) having a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating of 14,000 pounds or less; any 1995 through 2003 model year heavy-duty vehicle certified to the standards in section 1960.1(h)(1) having a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating of 14,000 pounds or less; and any 2000 and subsequent model heavy-duty low-emission, ultra-low-emission, super-ultra-low-emission or zero-emission vehicle certified to the standards in Section 1961(a)(1) or 1962 having a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating between 8,501 and 14,000 pounds.


        (11) "Passenger car" means any motor vehicle designed primarily for transportation of persons and having a design capacity of twelve persons or less.


        (14) "Subgroup" means a set of vehicles within an engine family distinguishable by characteristics contained in the manufacturer’s application for certification.

* * * *

        (17) "Reactivity adjustment factor" means a fraction applied to the NMOG emissions from a vehicle powered by a fuel other than conventional gasoline for the purpose of determining a gasoline-equivalent NMOG level. The reactivity adjustment factor is defined as the ozone-forming potential of clean fuel vehicle exhaust divided by the ozone-forming potential of gasoline vehicle exhaust.

        (18) "Small volume manufacturer" means, with respect to the 2001 and subsequent model-years, a manufacturer with California sales less than 4,500 new passenger cars, light-duty trucks, medium-duty vehicles, heavy-duty vehicles and heavy-duty engines based on the average number of vehicles sold for the three previous consecutive model years for which a manufacturer seeks certification; however, for manufacturers certifying for the first time in California model-year sales shall be based on projected California sales. A manufacturer’s California sales shall consist of all vehicles or engines produced by the manufacturer and delivered for sale in California, except that vehicles or engines produced by the manufacturer and marketed in California by another manufacturer under the other manufacturer’s nameplate shall be treated as California sales of the marketing manufacturer. For purposes of compliance with the zero-emission vehicle requirements, heavy-duty vehicles and engines shall not be counted as part of a manufacturer’s sales. For purposes of applying the 2005 and subsequent model year zero-emission vehicle requirements for small-volume manufacturers under section 1962(b), the annual sales from different firms shall be aggregated in the case of (1) vehicles produced by two or more firms, each one of which either has a greater than 50% equity ownership in another or is more than 50% owned by another; or (2) vehicles produced by any two or more firms if a third party has equity ownership of greater than 50% in each firm.

        (19) "Intermediate volume manufacturer" means any pre-2001 model year manufacturer with California sales between 3,001 and 60,000 new light- and medium-duty vehicles per model year based on the average number of vehicles sold by the manufacturer each model year from 1989 to 1993; any 2001 through 2002 model year manufacturer with California sales between 4,501 and 60,000 new light- and medium-duty vehicles per model year based on the average number of vehicles sold by the manufacturer each model year from 1989 to 1993; and any 2003 and subsequent model year manufacturer with California sales between 4,501 and 60,000 new light- and medium-duty vehicles based on the average number of vehicles sold for the three previous consecutive model years for which a manufacturer seeks certification. For a manufacturer certifying for the first time in California, model year sales shall be based on projected California sales. A manufacturer’s California sales shall consist of all vehicles or engines produced by the manufacturer and delivered for sale in California, except that vehicles or engines produced by the manufacturer and marketed in California by another manufacturer under the other manufacturer’s nameplate shall be treated as California sales of the marketing manufacturer. For purposes of applying the 2005 and subsequent model year zero-emission vehicle requirements for intermediate-volume manufacturers under section 1962(b), the annual sales from different firms shall be aggregated in the case of (1) vehicles produced by two or more firms, each one of which either has a greater than 50% equity ownership in another or is more than 50% owned by another; or (2) vehicles produced by any two or more firms if a third party has equity ownership of greater than 50% in each firm.

        (20) "Large volume manufacturer" means any 2000 and subsequent model year manufacturer that is not a small volume manufacturer, or an independent low volume manufacturer, or an intermediate volume manufacturer.

        (21) "Independent low volume manufacturer" means a manufacturer with California annual sales of less than 10,000 new passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles following aggregation of sales pursuant to this section 1900(b)(21). Annual sales shall be determined as the average number or sales sold for the three previous consecutive model years for which a manufacturer seeks certification; however, for a manufacturer certifying for the first time in California, annual sales shall be based on projected California sales for the model year. A manufacturer’s California sales shall consist of all vehicles or engines produced by the manufacturer and delivered for sale in California, except that vehicles or engines produced by the manufacturer and marketed in California by another manufacturer under the other manufacturer’s nameplate shall be treated as California sales of the marketing manufacturer. The annual sales from different firms shall be aggregated in the following situations:

        (A)  Vehicles produced by two or more firms, one of which is 10% or greater part owned by another;

        (B)  Vehicles produced by any two or more firms if a third party has equity ownership of 10% or more in each of the firms;

        (C)  Vehicles produced by two or more firms having a common corporate officer(s) who is (are) responsible for the overall direction of the companies;

        (D)  Vehicles imported or distributed by all firms where the vehicles are manufactured by the same entity and the importer or distributor is an authorized agent of the entity.

 

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 43018, 43101, and 43104 Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39010, 39500, 40000, 43000, 43013, 43100, 43101, 43101.5, 43102, 43104, 43106, and 43204, Health and Safety Code.


1956.8. Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures - 1985 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles.


        (a) [Exhaust emission standards for heavy-duty diesel engines and heavy-duty natural-gas-fueled, liquefied-petroleum-gas-fueled and methanol-fueled engines derived from diesel-cycle engines; not applicable to passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles and accordingly not set forth.]

        (b) The test procedures for determining compliance with standards applicable to 1985 and subsequent model heavy-duty diesel engines and vehicles and the requirements for participating in the averaging, banking and trading programs, are set forth in the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1985 through 2003 Model Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines and Vehicles, " adopted April 8, 1985, as last amended December 12, 2002, the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines and Vehicles," adopted December 12, 2002, and the "California Interim Certification Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Hybrid-Electric Vehicles, in the Urban Bus and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Classes," adopted October 24, 2002, which are incorporated by reference herein.

        (c)(1)(A) The exhaust emissions from (i) new 1987 through 2004 model heavy-duty Otto-cycle engines (except methanol-fueled engines and except heavy-duty Otto-cycle natural-gas-fueled and liquefied-petroleum-gas-fueled Otto-cycle engines derived from diesel-cycle engines) and (ii) from new 1993 through 2004 model heavy-duty methanol-fueled Otto-cycle engines (except in all cases engines used in medium-duty vehicles) shall not exceed:

Exhaust Emission Standards for Heavy-Duty Otto-Cycle Engines

(grams per brake horsepower-hour or g/bhp-hr)



Model Year

Total Hydrocarbons or OMHCEA

Optional Non-Methane HydrocarbonsA

Carbon MonoxideB

Oxides of Nitrogen

1987C


1.1D


--


14.4D


10.6


1.9E


--


37.1E


10.6


1988-1989


1.1D


--


14.4D


6.0


1.9E


--


37.1E


6.0


1990


1.1


0.9D


14.4D


6.0


1.9E


1.7E


37.1E


6.0


1991 – 1994


1.1D


0.9D


14.4D


5.0


1.9E


1.7E


37.1E


5.0


1995 – 1997


1.9E


1.7E


37.1E


5.0


1.9E


1.7E


37.1E


2.5 to 5.0F


1998 – 2003G



1.9E


1.7E


37.1E


4.0


1.9E


1.7E


37.1E


1.5 to 0.5F

 

Non-Methane Hydrocarbons

plus Oxides of Nitrogen (NMHC + NOx)


Carbon Monoxide


2004G

2.4 g/bhp-hr; or

2.5 with 0.5 g/bhp-hr cap on NMHC


37.1


A     The total or optional non-methane hydrocarbon standards apply to petroleum-fueled, natural-gas-fueled and liquefied-petroleum-gas-fueled engines and methanol-fueled engines beginning in 2004. The Organic Material Hydrocarbon Equivalent, or OMHCE, standards apply to 1987 through 2003 methanol-fueled engines.

B     Prior to the 2002 model year, carbon monoxide emissions from engines utilizing exhaust after treatment technology shall also not exceed 0.5 percent of the exhaust gas flow at curb idle.

C     Manufacturers with existing heavy-duty Otto-cycle engines certified to the California 1986 steady-state emission standards and test procedures may as an option certify those engines, for the 1987 model year only, in accordance with the standards and test procedures for 1986 heavy-duty Otto-cycle engines established in Section 1956.7.

D     These standards are applicable to Otto-cycle engines intended for use in all heavy-duty vehicles.

E      Applicable to heavy-duty Otto-cycle engines intended for use only in vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 14,000 pounds. Also, as an option, a manufacturer may certify one or more 1988 through 1994 model Otto-cycle heavy-duty engine configurations intended for use in all heavy-duty vehicles to these emission standards, provided that the total model-year sales of such configuration(s) being certified to these emission standards represent no more than 5 percent of total model-year sales of all Otto-cycle heavy-duty engines intended for use in vehicles with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating of up to 14,000 pounds by the manufacturer.

F      These are optional standards and apply to all heavy-duty engines intended for use only in vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 14,000 pounds. A manufacturer may elect to certify to an optional standard between the values, inclusive, by 0.5 grams per brake horsepower-hour increments.

G     A manufacturer may request to certify to Option 1 or Option 2 federal NMHC + NOx standards as set forth in 40 CFR § 86.005-10(f), as adopted October 6, 2000.


        (B) The exhaust emissions from new 2005 and subsequent model heavy-duty Otto-cycle engines, except for Otto-cycle medium- and heavy-duty engines subject to the alternative standards in 40 CFR §86.005-10(f), shall not exceed:

California Emission Standards for 2005 and Subsequent Model

Heavy-Duty Otto-Cycle EnginesA

(in g/bhp-hr)


Model Year

Emission Category

NMHC + NOx

NMHC

NOx

COF

HCHO

PM

Standards for Heavy-Duty Otto-Cycle Engines Used In Incomplete

Medium-Duty Vehicles 8,501 to 14,000 pounds GVWB

2005 through 2007

ULEV

1.0C,E

n/a

n/a

14.4

0.05

n/a

SULEV

0.5

n/a

n/a

7.2

0.025

n/a

2008 and subsequent

ULEV

n/a

0.14E

0.20E

14.4

0.01

0.01

SULEV

n/a

0.07E

0.10E

7.2

0.005

0.005

Standards for Heavy-Duty Otto-Cycle Engines Used In

Heavy-Duty Vehicles Over 14,000 pounds GVW

2005 through 2007

n/a

1.0C,E

n/a

n/a

37.1

0.05D

n/a

2008 and subsequent

n/a

n/a

0.14E

0.20E

14.4

0.01

0.01


A     These standards apply to petroleum-fueled, alcohol-fueled, liquefied petroleum gas-fueled and natural gas-fueled Otto-cycle engines.

B.     A manufacturer of engines used in incomplete medium-duty vehicles may choose to comply with these standards as an alternative to the primary emission standards and test procedures for complete vehicles specified in section 1961, title 13, CCR. A manufacturer that chooses to comply with these optional heavy-duty engine standards and test procedures shall specify, in the Part I application for certification, an in-use compliance test procedure, as provided in section 2139(c), title 13 CCR.

C     A manufacturer may request to certify to the Option 1 or Option 2 federal NMHC + NOx standards as set forth in 40 CFR § 86.005-10(f). However, for engines used in medium-duty vehicles, the formaldehyde level must meet the standard specified above.

D     This standard only applies to methanol-fueled Otto-cycle engines.

E       A manufacturer may elect to include any or all of its medium- and heavy-duty Otto-cycle engine families in any or all of the emissions ABT programs for HDEs, within the restrictions described in section I.15 of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Otto-Cycle Engines," incorporated by reference in section 1956.8(d). For engine families certified to the Option 1 or 2 federal standards, the FEL must not exceed 1.5 g/bhp-hr. If a manufacturer elects to include engine families certified to the 2005 and subsequent model year standards, the NOx plus NMHC FEL must not exceed 1.0 g/bhp-hr. For engine families certified to the 2008 and subsequent model year standards, the FEL is the same as set forth in 40 CFR 86.008-10(a)(1).

F        Idle carbon monoxide: For all Otto-cycle heavy-duty engines utilizing aftertreatment technology, and not certified to the on-board diagnostics requirements of section 1968, et seq, as applicable, the CO emissions shall not exceed 0.50 percent of exhaust gas flow at curb idle.

         (c)(2)       Formaldehyde exhaust emissions from new 1993 and subsequent model methanol-fueled Otto-cycle engines shall not exceed:


        Model Year                                     Formaldehyde

                                                                  (g/bhp-hr)

 

        1993-1995                                      0.10

        1996 and Subsequent                      0.05


        (d) The test procedures for determining compliance with standards applicable to 1987 and subsequent model heavy-duty Otto-cycle engines and vehicles are set forth in the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1987 through 2003 Model Heavy-Duty Otto-Cycle Engines and Vehicles," adopted April 25, 1986, as last amended December 27, 2000, the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Otto-Cycle Engines," adopted December 27, 2000, as last amended December 12, 2002, the "California Non-Methane Organic Gas Test Procedures," adopted July 12, 1991, as last amended July 30, 2002, and the "California Interim Certification Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Hybrid-Electric Vehicles, in the Urban Bus and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Classes," adopted October 24, 2002, which are incorporated by reference herein.

        (e) A manufacturer may elect to certify complete heavy-duty vehicles of 14,000 pounds or less maximum gross vehicle weight rating as medium-duty vehicles under section 1960.1 or section 1961 of this chapter, in which event the heavy-duty emission standards and test procedures in this section shall not apply.

        (f) [Use of engines certified to meet federal emission standards, or which are demonstrated to meet appropriate federal emission standards, in up to a total of 100 heavy-duty vehicles in a calendar year when the executive officer has determined that no engine certified to meet California emission standards exists which is suitable for use in the vehicles; not applicable to passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles and accordingly not set forth.]

        (g) The exhaust emissions from new 1995 through 2003 model-year engines used in incomplete medium-duty vehicles or diesel engines used in medium-duty vehicles shall not exceed:


Exhaust Emission StandardsA

(grams per brake horsepower-hour, or g/bhp-hr)

Model Year

Carbon Monoxide

NMHC + NOxB

ParticulatesC

1995D through 2003

14.4

3.9

0.10


 A     This set of standards is optional. Manufacturers of engines used in incomplete medium-duty vehicles or diesel engines used in medium-duty vehicles from 8501-14,000 pounds, gross vehicle weight may choose to comply with these standards as a alternative to the primary emission standards and test procedures specified in section 1960.1, Title 13, California Code of Regulations. Manufacturers that choose to comply with these optional heavy-duty standards and test procedures shall specify, in the application for certification, an in-use compliance test procedure, as provided in section 2139(c), Title 13, California Code of Regulations.

B     This standard is the sum of the individual non-methane hydrocarbon emissions and oxides of nitrogen emissions. For methanol-fueled engines, non-methane hydrocarbons shall mean organic material hydrocarbon equivalent.

C     This standard shall only apply to diesel engines and vehicles.

D     In the 1995 model-year only, manufacturers may certify up to 50 percent of their medium-duty engines or vehicles to the applicable 1994 model-year standards and test procedures. For the 1995 through 1997 models, alternative in-use compliance is available for medium-duty manufacturers. A manufacturer may use alternative in-use compliance for up to 100 percent of its fleet in the 1995 and 1996 model years and up to 50 percent of its fleet in the 1997 model year. The percentages shall be determined from the manufacturers’ projected California sales of medium-duty vehicles. For engines certified to the standards and test procedures of this subsection, "alternative in-use compliance" shall consist of an allowance of 25 percent over the HC + NOx standard. In-use compliance testing shall be limited to vehicles or engines with less than 90,000 miles.


       (h) The exhaust emissions from new:

       (1) 1992 through 2004 model-year Otto-cycle engines used in incomplete medium-duty low-emission vehicles, ultra-low-emission vehicles, and super-ultra-low-emission vehicles, and

       (2) 1992 and subsequent model diesel engines used in medium-duty low-emission vehicles, ultra-low-emission vehicles and super-ultra-low-emission vehicles shall not exceed:


Exhaust Emission Standards for Engines Used in Incomplete

Otto-Cycle Medium-Duty Low-Emission Vehicles, Ultra-Low-Emission Vehicles, and

Super Ultra-Low-Emission Vehicles, and for Diesel Engines Used in

Medium-Duty Low-Emission Vehicles, Ultra-Low-Emission Vehicles, and

Super Ultra-Low-Emission VehiclesA,F

(grams per brake horsepower-hour)


Model

Year

Vehicle Emissions CategoryB

Carbon Monoxide

NMHC + NOx C

Non-Methane Hydrocarbons

Oxides of Nitrogen

Formaldehyde

ParticulatesD

1992E - 2001

LEV

14.4

3.5 K

n/a

n/a

0.050

0.10 K

2002-2003E

LEV


14.4

3.0 K

n/a

n/a

0.050

0.10 K

1992-2003E,H

ULEV

14.4

2.5 K

n/a

n/a

0.050

0.10 K

2004 and subsequent L

ULEV - Opt A

14.4

2.5 I,J,K

n/a

n/a

0.050

0.10 J,K

2004 and subsequent L

ULEV - Opt. B

14.4

2.4 I,J,K

n/a

n/a

0.050

0.10 J,K

2007 and subsequent D

ULEV

15.5

n/a

0.14

0.2

0.050

0.01

1992 and subsequent L

SULEV

7.2

2.0 K

n/a

n/a

0.025

0.05 K

2007 and subsequent D

SULEV

7.7

n/a

0.07

0.1

0.025

0.005


A     This set of standards is optional. Manufacturers of engines used in incomplete medium-duty vehicles or diesel engines used in medium-duty vehicles from 8501-14,000 pounds gross vehicle weight rating may choose to comply with these standards as an alternative to the primary emission standards and test procedures specified in section 1960.1, or section 1961, Title 13, California Code of Regulations. Manufacturers that choose to comply with these optional heavy-duty standards and test procedures shall specify, in the application for certification, an in-use compliance test procedure, as provided in section 2139(c), Title 13, California Code of Regulations.

B     "LEV" means low-emission vehicle.

        "ULEV" means ultra-low-emission vehicle.

        "SULEV" means super ultra-low-emission vehicle.

C     This standard is the sum of the individual non-methane hydrocarbon emissions and oxides of nitrogen emissions. For methanol-fueled engines, non-methane hydrocarbons shall mean organic material hydrocarbon equivalent ("OMHCE").

D     These standards apply only to diesel engines and vehicles.

E      Manufacturers may certify engines used in incomplete medium-duty vehicles or diesel engines used in medium-duty vehicles to these standards to meet the requirements of section 1956.8(g), Title 13, California Code of Regulations.

F      In-use compliance testing shall be limited to vehicles or engines with fewer than 90,000 miles.

G     [Reserved]

H     For engines certified to the 3.5 grams per brake horsepower-hour (g/bhp-hr) LEV standards, the in-use compliance standard shall be 3.7 g/bhp-hr for the first two model years of introduction. For engines certified to the 2002 and 2003 model year LEV standards, the in-use compliance standard shall be 3.2 g/bhp-hr. For engines certified to the 1992 through 2003 model year ULEV standards, the in-use compliance standard shall be 2.7 g/bhp-hr for the first two model years of introduction. For engines certified to the 1992 and subsequent SULEV standards, the in-use compliance standard shall be 2.2 g/bhp-hr for the first two model years of introduction.

I      Manufacturers have the option of certifying to either option A or B. Manufacturers electing to certify to Option A must demonstrate that the NMHC emissions do not exceed 0.5 g/bhp-hr.

J      Emissions averaging may be used to meet these standards for diesel engines, using the requirements for participation in averaging, banking and trading programs, as set forth in the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines and Vehicles," incorporated by reference in section 1956.8 (b), above.

K     Engines of 1998 and subsequent model years may be eligible to generate averaging, banking and trading credits based on these standards according to the requirements of the averaging, banking and trading programs described in the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1985 through 2003 Model Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles" and the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines and Vehicles," incorporated by reference in section 1956.8(b), above.

L       For 2007 and subsequent model year diesel engines used in medium-duty vehicles, these emission standards are not applicable.


        (3) 2007 and later model year engines subject to (h)(2) have the following Phase-in Options.

        (A) Early NOx compliant engines. For model years 2007, 2008, and 2009, a manufacturer may, at their option, certify one or more of their engine families to the combined NOx plus NMHC standard or FEL applicable to model year 2006 engines under section 1956.8 (h)(2), in lieu of the separate NOx and NMHC standards or FELs applicable to the 2007 and subsequent model years, specified in section 1956.8 (h)(2). Each engine certified under this phase-in option must comply with all other emission requirements applicable to model year 2007 engines. To qualify for this option, a manufacturer must satisfy the U.S.-directed production requirement of certifying no more than 50 percent of engines to the NOx plus NMHC standards or FELs applicable to 2006 engines, as specified in 40 Code of Federal Regulations, part 86, section 86.007-11 (g)(1), as adopted January 18, 2001. In addition, a manufacturer may reduce the quantity of engines that are required to be phased-in using the early certification credit program specified in 40 Code of Federal Regulations, part 86, section 86.007-11 (g)(2), as adopted January 18, 2001, and the "Blue Sky" engine program specified in 40 Code of Federal Regulations, part 86, section 86.007-11 (g)(4), as adopted January 18, 2001.

        (B) Early PM compliant engines. A manufacturer certifying engines to the 2007 and subsequent model year PM standard listed in section 1956.8 (h)(2) (without using credits, as determined in any averaging, banking, or trading program described in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1985 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines and Vehicles," to comply with the standards) before model year 2007 may reduce the number of engines that are required to meet the 2007 and subsequent model year PM standard listed in section 1956.8 (h)(2) in model year 2007, 2008 and/or 2009. To qualify for this option, a manufacturer must satisfy the PM emission requirements pursuant to the methods detailed in 40 Code of Federal Regulations, part 86, section 86.007-11 (g)(2)(ii), as adopted January 18, 2001.

        (4) No crankcase emissions shall be discharged directly into the ambient atmosphere from any new 2007 or later model year diesel heavy-duty diesel engine, with the following exception: heavy-duty diesel engines equipped with turbochargers, pumps, blowers, or superchargers for air induction may discharge crankcase emissions to the ambient atmosphere if the emissions are added to the exhaust emissions (either physically or mathematically) during all emission testing. Manufacturers taking advantage of this exception must manufacture the engines so that all crankcase emission can be routed into a dilution tunnel (or other sampling system approved in advance by the Executive Officer), and must account for deterioration in crankcase emissions when determining exhaust deterioration factors. For the purpose of section 1956.8 (h)(2), crankcase emissions that are routed to the exhaust upstream of exhaust aftertreatment during all operation are not considered to be "discharged directly into the ambient atmosphere.''

 

NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 43018, 43101, 43104, 43105 and 43806, Health and Safety Code; and Section 28114, Vehicle Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39500, 43000, 43013, 43018, 43100, 43101, 43101.5, 43102, 43104, 43106, 43202, 43204, 43206, 43210, 43211, 43212, 43213, and 43806, Health and Safety Code; and Section 28114, Vehicle Code.


1960.1. Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures - 1981 through 2006 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles.


        (a) [Exhaust emission standards for 1981 model passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles; not set forth]


        (b) [Exhaust emission standards for 1982 model passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles; not set forth]


        (c) [Exhaust emission standards for 1983 model passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles; not set forth]


        (d) [Exhaust emission standards for 1984 through 1990 model passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles; not set forth]


        (e)(1) [Exhaust emission standards for 1989 through 1994 model passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles; not set forth]


        (e)(2)       The exhaust emissions from new 1993 through 2003 model methanol-fueled vehicles, including fuel-flexible vehicles, shall meet all the applicable requirements in (e)(1), (f)(1) and (f)(2) with the following modifications and additions:


1993 THROUGH 2003 METHANOL-SPECIFIC

EXHAUST EMISSION STANDARDS


Vehicle Type1

Loaded Vehicle Weight

(lbs.)3

Durability Vehicle Basis

(mi)

Formaldehyde (mg/mi)

Certification

In-Use Compliance2

PC

50,000     15    23 (1993-1995)

All

50,000

15

23 (1993-1995)

15 (1996- 2003)

15 (1996-2003)

LDT, MDV

0 - 3750

50,000

15

23 (1993-1995)

33 (1993-1995)

15 (1996-2003)

LDT, MDV

22 (1996- 2003)

3751 – 5750

50,000

18

27 (1993-1995)

18 (1996-2003)

MDV

5751 – 8500

50,000

22

33 (1993-1995)

22 (1996-2003)

MDV

8501 – 10,000

50,000

28

36 (1995)

28 (1996-2003)

MDV

10,001 – 14,000

50,000

36

45 (1995)

36 (1996-2003)

1      "PC" means passenger cars.

         "LDT" means light-duty trucks.

"MDV" means medium-duty vehicles.

2      If the formaldehyde in-use compliance level is above the respective certification level but does not exceed the in-use compliance level, and based on a review of information derived from a statistically valid and representative sample of vehicles, the Executive Officer determines that a substantial percentage of any class or category of such vehicle exhibits, prior to 50,000 miles or 5 years, whichever occurs first, an identifiable, systematic defect in a component listed in Section 1960.1.5(c)(2), Title 13 California Code of Regulations, which causes a significant increase in emissions above those exhibited by vehicles free of such defects and of the same class or category and having the same period of use and mileage, the Executive Officer may invoke the enforcement authority under subchapter 2.5, Title 13, California Code of Regulations, commencing with Section 2111, to require remedial action by the vehicle manufacturer. Such remedial action shall be limited to owner notification and repair or replacement of the defective component. As used in this section, the term "defect" shall not include failures which are the result of abuse, neglect, or improper maintenance.

3      For 1995-2003 model year medium-duty vehicles certifying to the standards and test procedures specified in Section 1960.1(h)(1), Title 13, California Code of Regulations, "Loaded Vehicle Weight" shall mean "Test Weight", which is the average of the vehicle’s curb weight and gross vehicle weight.


        (e)(3)       The exhaust emissions from new 1992 through 2006 model-year "LEV I" transitional low-emission vehicles, low-emission vehicles, ultra-low-emission vehicles, and super-ultra-low-emission vehicles, including fuel-flexible and dual-fuel vehicles, shall meet all the requirements in (g)(1), and (h)(2) with the following additions:


FORMALDEHYDE EXHAUST EMISSION STANDARDS

IN THE LIGHT-DUTY AND MEDIUM-DUTY VEHICLE WEIGHT CLASSES5,6,7

["milligrams per mile" (or "mg/mi")]


Vehicle Type1

Vehicle Weight

(lbs.)2

Durability Vehicle Basis (mi)

Vehicle Emission Category3

Formaldehyde (mg/mi)4,5

PC and LDT

All 0-3750

50,000


 100,000

TLEV

LEV

ULEV

TLEV

LEV

ULEV

15 (23)

15 (15)

 8 (12)

18

18

11

LDT

3751-5750

50,000



100,000

TLEV

LEV

ULEV

TLEV

LEV

ULEV

18 (27)

18 (18)

  9 (14)

23

23

13

MDV

0-3750

50,000


120,000

LEV

ULEV

LEV

ULEV

15 (15)

 8 (12)

22

12

MDV

3751-5750

50,000



120,000

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

18 (18)

 9 (14)

 4 (7)

27

13

 6

MDV

5751-8500

50,000


120,000

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

22 (22)

11 (17)

6 (8)

32

16

 8

MDV

8501-10,000

50,000



120,000

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

28 (28)

14 (21)

7 (10)

40

21

10

MDV

10,001-14,000

50,000



120,000

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

36 (36)

18 (27)

9 (14)

52

26

13


1      "PC" means passenger cars.

         "LDT" means light-duty trucks.

         "MDV" means medium-duty vehicles.

2      For light-duty or medium-duty vehicles, Vehicle Weight shall mean "Loaded Vehicle Weight" (or "LVW") or "Test Weight" (or "TW"), respectively.

3      "TLEV" means transitional low-emission vehicle.

        "LEV" means low-emission vehicle.

        "ULEV" means ultra-low-emission vehicle.

        "SULEV" means super-ultra-low-emission vehicle.

4      Formaldehyde exhaust emission standards apply to vehicles certified to operate on any available fuel, including fuel-flexible and dual-fuel vehicles.

5      The standards in parentheses are intermediate in-use compliance standards for 50,000 miles.

        a.     For PCs and LDTs from 0-5750 lbs. LVW, including fuel-flexible and dual-fuel vehicles, intermediate in-use compliance standards shall apply to TLEVs through the 1995 model year, and LEVs and ULEVs through the 1998 model year. In-use compliance with standards beyond 50,000 miles shall be waived through the 1995 model year for TLEVs, and through the 1998 model year for LEVs and ULEVs.

        b.     For MDVs from 0-14,000 lbs. TW, including fuel-flexible and dual-fuel vehicles, intermediate in-use compliance standards shall apply to LEVs, ULEVs, and SULEVs through the 1999 model year. In-use compliance with standards beyond 50,000 miles shall be waived through the 1999 model year for LEVs, ULEVs, and SULEVs.


6      Manufacturers shall demonstrate compliance with the above standards for formaldehyde at 50o F, according to the procedure specified in section 11k of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k) or section E.1.4 of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d). Hybrid electric, natural gas, and diesel-fueled vehicles shall be exempt from 50oF test requirements.

7      In-use compliance testing shall be limited to PCs and LDTs with fewer than 75,000 miles and MDVs with fewer than 90,000 miles.


        (f)(1) [Exhaust emission standards for new 1993 and 1994 model passenger cars and light-duty trucks, except those produced by a small volume manufacturer; not set forth]


        (f)(2) "Tier 1" Exhaust Emission Standards for PCs and LDTs. The exhaust emissions from new 1995 through 2003 model Tier 1 passenger cars and light-duty trucks shall not exceed:


1995-2003 MODEL-YEAR TIER 1 PASSENGER CAR AND

LIGHT-DUTY TRUCK EXHAUST EMISSIONS STANDARDS5,6,8,10

(grams per mile)


Vehicle Type1

Loaded Vehicle Weight

(lbs.)

Durability Vehicle Basis

(mi.)

Non-Methane Hydrocarbons2,7

Carbon Monoxide7

Oxides of Nitrogen1,3

PC

All

50,000

0.25

3.4

0.44

PC

All

100,000

0.31

4.2

0.69

Diesel PC (Option 2)

All

100,000

0.31

4.2

1.0

LDT

0 - 3750

50,000

0.25

3.4

0.44

LDT

0 – 3750

100,000

0.31

4.2

0.69

Diesel LDT (Option 2)

0 - 3750

100,000

0.31

4.2

1.0

LDT

3751 – 5750

50,000

0.32

4.4

0.7

LDT

3751 – 5750

100,000

0.40

5.5

   0.979

Diesel LDT (Option 1)

3751 – 5750

100,000

0.40

5.5

1.5


 1      "PC" means passenger car. "LDT" means light-duty truck.

 2      For methanol- or ethanol-fueled vehicles certifying to these standards, including fuel-flexible vehicles when certifying on methanol or ethanol, "Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" shall mean "Organic Material Non-Methane Hydrocarbon Equivalent" (or "OMNMHCE").

 3      The maximum projected emissions of oxides of nitrogen measured on the federal Highway Fuel Economy Test (HWFET; 40 CFR Part 600 Subpart B) shall be not greater than 1.33 times the applicable passenger car standards and 2.00 times the applicable light-duty truck standards shown in the table. Both the projected emissions and the HWFET standard shall be rounded in accordance with ASTM E29-67 to the nearest 0.1 g/mi before being compared.

4      Small volume manufacturers may choose to certify to an optional 0.7 g/mi NOx standard for the 1995 model year only, pursuant to the conditions set forth in sections 1960.1 (f)(1) and 1960.1.5.

5      Diesel passenger cars and light-duty trucks certifying to these standards are subject to a particulate exhaust emission standard of 0.08 g/mi, determined on a 50,000 mile durability vehicle basis.

6      For all vehicles, except those certifying to optional diesel standards, in-use compliance with the exhaust emission standards shall be limited to vehicles with less than 75,000 miles.

7      For the 1995 and 1996 model years, all manufacturers, except those certifying to optional diesel standards, are permitted alternative in-use compliance. Alternative in-use compliance is permitted for 60% of a manufacturer’s vehicles in the 1995 model year and 20% of a manufacturer’s vehicles in the 1996 model year. For the 1995 and 1996 model years, small volume manufacturers only are permitted alternative in-use compliance for 100% of the fleet. The percentages shall be applied to the manufacturer’s total projected sales of California-certified passenger cars and light-duty trucks for the model year. "Alternative in-use compliance" shall consist of the following:

a      For all passenger cars and those light-duty trucks from 0-3750 lbs. loaded vehicle weight, except those diesel vehicles certifying to optional 100,000 mile standards, in-use compliance standards shall be 0.32 g/mi non-methane hydrocarbon and 5.2 g/mi carbon monoxide for 50,000 miles.

b.     For light-duty trucks from 3751-5750 lbs. loaded vehicle weight, except those diesel light-duty trucks certifying to optional 100,000 mile standards, in-use compliance standards shall be 0.41 g/mi non-methane hydrocarbon and 6.7 g/mi carbon monoxide for 50,000 miles.i) 

c.     In-use compliance standards shall be waived beyond 50,000 miles.

8      All passenger cars and light-duty trucks, except those diesel vehicles certifying to optional standards, are subject to non-methane hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen standards determined on a 50,000 mile durability basis and non-methane hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide standards determined on a 100,000 mile durability basis.

9      100,000 mile NOx standards are applicable for 1996 and subsequent model-year vehicles.

10    Each manufacturer shall also comply with the requirements specified in section 1960.1 (g)(2).


        (g)(1)      "LEV I" Exhaust Emission Standards for PCs and LDTs. The exhaust emissions from new 1992 through 2003 model-year "LEV I" transitional low-emission vehicles, and new 1992 through 2006 model-year "LEV I" low-emission vehicles and ultra-low-emission vehicles, in the passenger car and light-duty truck classes shall not exceed:


LEV I EXHAUST EMISSION STANDARDS

FOR TRANSITIONAL LOW-EMISSION VEHICLES, LOW-EMISSION VEHICLES,

ULTRA-LOW-EMISSION VEHICLES AND ZERO-EMISSION VEHICLES

IN PASSENGER CAR AND LIGHT-DUTY TRUCK VEHICLE CLASSES6,7,8,9,10

[grams per mile (or "g/mi")]


Vehicle Type1

Loaded

Vehicle

Weight (lbs)

Durability

Vehicle

Basis(mi)

Vehicle

Emission

Category2

Non-Methane

Organic Gases3,4

Carbon

Monoxide

Oxides of

Nitrogen5

PC and All LDT

0-3750

50,000



100,000

TLEV

LEV

ULEV

TLEV

LEV

ULEV

0.125

0.075

0.040

0.156

0.090

0.055

3.4

3.4

1.7

4.2

4.2

2.1

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.6

0.3

0.3

LDT

3751-5750

50,000



100,000

TLEV

LEV

ULEV

TLEV

LEV

ULEV

0.160

0.100

0.050

0.200

0.130

0.070

4.4

4.4

2.2

5.5

5.5

2.8

0.7

0.4

0.4

0.9

0.5

0.5


1      "PC" means passenger cars.

        "LDT" means light-duty trucks.

                "LVW" means loaded vehicle weight.

        "Non-Methane Organic Gases" or "NMOG" means the total mass of oxygenated and non-oxygenated hydrocarbon emissions.

2      "TLEV" means transitional low-emission vehicle.

        "LEV" means low-emission vehicle.

        "ULEV" means ultra-low-emission vehicle.

3      Compliance with NMOG Standard. To demonstrate compliance with an NMOG standard, NMOG emissions shall be measured in accordance with the "California Non-Methane Organic Gas Test Procedures" as adopted July 12, 1991 and last amended July 30, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.

        a.     Reactivity Adjustment. For TLEVs, LEVs, and ULEVs certified to operate exclusively on any fuel other than conventional gasoline, and for fuel-flexible and dual-fuel TLEVs, LEVs, and ULEVs when certifying on a fuel other than gasoline, manufacturers shall multiply NMOG exhaust certification levels by the applicable reactivity adjustment factor set forth in section 13 of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 Through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), or in section I.E.5. of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d), or established by the Executive Officer pursuant to Appendix VIII or section II.D. respectively of the foregoing test procedures. In addition, natural gas vehicles certifying to TLEV, LEV or ULEV standards shall calculate a reactivity-adjusted methane exhaust emission value by multiplying the methane exhaust certification level by the applicable methane reactivity adjustment factor set forth in section 13 or in section I.E.5. of the above-referenced test procedures as applicable. The product of the NMOG exhaust certification levels and the reactivity adjustment factor shall be compared to the exhaust NMOG mass emission standards established for the particular vehicle emission category to determine compliance. For natural gas vehicles, the reactivity-adjusted NMOG value shall be added to the reactivity-adjusted methane value and then compared to the exhaust NMOG mass emission standards established for the particular vehicle emission category to determine compliance.

        b.     Fleet Average Requirement. Each manufacturer shall certify PCs or LDTs to meet the exhaust mass emission standards for TLEVs, LEVs, ULEVs, or the exhaust emission standards of sections 1960.1(e)(1), 1960.1(f)(1), or 1960.1(f)(2), Title 13, California Code of Regulations, or as Zero-Emission Vehicles, such that the manufacturer’s fleet average NMOG values for California-certified PCs and LDTs from 0-3750 lbs. LVW, and LDTs from 3751-5750 lbs. LVW produced and delivered for sale in California are less than or equal to the requirement for the corresponding Model Year, Vehicle Type, and LVW Class in section 1960.1(g)(2), Title 13, California Code of Regulations.

4      NMOG Standards for Fuel-Flexible and Dual-Fuel Vehicles. Fuel-flexible and dual-fuel PCs and LDTs from 0-5750 lbs. LVW shall be certified to exhaust mass emission standards for NMOG established for the operation of the vehicle on any available fuel other than gasoline, and gasoline.

        a.     Reactivity Adjustment. For TLEVs, LEVs, and ULEVs, when certifying for operation on a fuel other than gasoline, manufacturers shall multiply exhaust NMOG certification levels by the applicable reactivity adjustment factor. In addition to multiplying the exhaust NMOG certification levels by the applicable reactivity adjustment factor, exhaust methane certification levels for natural gas vehicles shall be multiplied by the applicable methane reactivity adjustment factor and the resulting value shall be added to the reactivity-adjusted NMOG value. The exhaust NMOG certification levels for fuel-flexible or dual-fuel vehicles when certifying on gasoline shall not be multiplied by a reactivity adjustment factor.

        b.     Standards for Fuel-Flexible and Dual-Fuel Vehicles Operating on Gasoline. For PCs and LDTs from 0- 5750 lbs. LVW, the applicable exhaust mass emission standard for NMOG when certifying the vehicle for operation on gasoline shall be:


Vehicle Type

Loaded Vehicle Weight (LVW)

Emission

Category

Durability Vehicle Basis (g/mi)

50,000 Mile

100,000 Mile

PCs, LDT

All, 0-3750

TLEV

0.25

0.31

LEV

0.125

0.156

ULEV

0.075

0.09

LDT

3751-5750

TLEV

0.32

0.4

LEV

0.16

0.2

ULEV

0.1

0.13


5      Highway NOx. The maximum projected emissions of "Oxides of Nitrogen" (or "NOx") measured on the federal Highway Fuel Economy Test (HWFET; 40 CFR 600 Subpart B) shall be not greater than 1.33 times the applicable light-duty vehicle standards shown in the table. Both the projected emissions and the HWFET standard shall be rounded in accordance with ASTM E29-67 to the nearest 0.1 g/mi before being compared.

6      Intermediate In-Use Compliance Standards. The following standards are intermediate in-use compliance standards for 50,000 and 100,000 miles for PCs and LDTs from 0-5750 lbs. LVW, including fuel-flexible and dual-fuel vehicles when operating on any available fuel other than gasoline. Intermediate in-use compliance standards shall apply to TLEVs through the 1995 model year as follows:


 

NMOG (g/mi)

PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW

0.188

LDTs 3751-5750 lbs. LVW

0.238


In-use compliance with standards beyond 50,000 miles shall be waived through the 1995 model year for TLEVs, and through the 1998 model year for LEVs and ULEVs. For LEVs and ULEVs, the following intermediate in-use standards shall apply:


Vehicle Type

Durability

Vehicle

Basis

LEV (g/mi)

ULEV (g/mi)

Model Year

NMOG

NOx

Model Year

NMOG

CO

NOx

PCs, 0-3750 lb. LVW LDTs

50,000

through 1998

0.1

0.3

through 1998

0.058

2.6

0.3

50,000

1999

0.1

0.3

1999-2002

0.055

2.1

0.3

100,000

1999

0.125

0.4

1999-2002

0.075

3.4

0.4

3751-5750 lb. LVW LDTs

50,000

through 1998

0.128

0.5

through 1998

0.075

3.3

0.5

50,000

1999

0.13

0.5

1999-2002

0.07

2.8

0.5

100,000

1999

0.16

0.7

1999-2002

0.1

4.4

0.7

 

        a.     Reactivity Adjustment. For TLEVs, LEVs, and ULEVs designed to operate on any fuel other than conventional gasoline, including fuel-flexible and dual-fuel vehicles when operating on any fuel other than gasoline, exhaust NMOG mass emission results shall be multiplied by the applicable reactivity adjustment factor to determine compliance with intermediate in-use compliance standards for NMOG. In addition to multiplying the exhaust NMOG emission results by the applicable reactivity adjustment factor, the exhaust methane emission results for natural gas vehicles shall be multiplied by the applicable methane reactivity adjustment factor and the resulting value shall be added to the reactivity-adjusted NMOG value. Exhaust NMOG mass emissions from fuel-flexible or dual-fuel vehicles when operating on gasoline shall not be multiplied by a reactivity adjustment factor.

        b.     Intermediate In-Use Standards for Fuel-Flexible and Dual-Fuel Vehicles Operating on Gasoline. For fuel-flexible and dual-fuel PCs and LDTs from 0-5750 lbs. LVW, intermediate in-use compliance standards for NMOG emissions at 50,000 miles when the vehicle is operated on gasoline shall be:


Vehicle Type

Loaded Vehicle

Weight

(LVW)

Emission

Category

Durability Vehicle Basis

(g/mi)

50,000 mi

PCs, LDT

All, 0-3750

TLEV

0.32

LEV

0.188

ULEV

0.1

LDT

3751-5750

TLEV

0.41

LEV

0.238

ULEV

0.128

 

Intermediate in-use compliance standards shall apply to TLEVs through the 1995 model year, and to LEVs and ULEVs through the 1998 model year. In-use compliance with standards beyond 50,000 miles shall be waived through the 1995 model year for TLEVs and through the 1998 model year for LEVs and ULEVs.

7Diesel Standards. Manufacturers of diesel vehicles shall also certify to particulate standards at 100,000 miles. For all PCs and LDTs from 0-3750 lbs. LVW, the particulate standard is 0.08 g/mi, 0.08 g/mi, and 0.04 g/mi for TLEVs, LEVs, and ULEVs, respectively. For LDTs from 3751-5750 lbs. LVW, the particulate standard is 0.10 g/mi, 0.10 g/mi, and 0.05 g/mi for TLEVs, LEVs and ULEVs, respectively. For diesel vehicles certifying to the standards set forth in Title 13, section 1960.1(g)(1), "NMOG" shall mean non-methane hydrocarbons.

850oF Requirement. Manufacturers shall demonstrate compliance with the above standards for NMOG, CO, and NOx at 50oF, according to the procedure specified in section 11k of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 Through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), or according to the procedure specified in section II.C. of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d), as applicable. Hybrid electric, natural gas and diesel-fueled vehicles shall be exempt from 50oF test requirements.

9Limit on In-Use Testing. In-use compliance testing shall be limited to vehicles with fewer than 75,000 miles.

10HEV Requirements. Deterioration factors for hybrid electric vehicles shall be based on the emissions and mileage accumulation of the auxiliary power unit. For certification purposes only, Type A hybrid electric vehicles shall demonstrate compliance with 50,000 mile emission standards (using 50,000 mile deterioration factors), and demonstrating compliance with 100,000 mile emission standards shall not be required. For certification purposes only, Type B hybrid electric vehicles shall demonstrate compliance with 50,000 mile emission standards (using 50,000 mile deterioration factors) and 100,000 mile emission standards (using 75,000 mile deterioration factors). For certification purposes only, Type C hybrid electric vehicles shall demonstrate compliance with 50,000 mile emission standards (using 50,000 mile deterioration factors) and 100,000 mile emission standards (using 100,000 mile deterioration factors).

11NMOG Credit for Direct Ozone Reduction Technology. A manufacturer that certifies vehicles equipped with direct ozone reduction technologies shall be eligible to receive NMOG credits that can be applied to the NMOG exhaust emissions of the vehicle when determining compliance with the standard. In order to receive credit, the manufacturer must submit the following information for each vehicle model, including, but not limited to:

a.     a demonstration of the airflow rate through the direct ozone reduction device and the ozone-reducing efficiency of the device over the range of speeds encountered in the SFTP test cycle;

b.     an evaluation of the durability of the device for the full useful life of the vehicle; and

c.     a description of the on-board diagnostic strategy for monitoring the performance of the device in-use.

Using the above information, the Executive Officer shall determine the value of the NMOG credit based on the calculated change in the one-hour peak ozone level using an approved airshed model.


        (g)(2)      The fleet average non-methane organic gas exhaust emission values from passenger cars and light-duty trucks produced and delivered for sale in California by a manufacturer each model year from 1994 through 2000 shall not exceed:


FLEET AVERAGE NON-METHANE ORGANIC GAS EXHAUST MASS EMISSION

REQUIREMENTS FOR LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLE WEIGHT CLASSES7,8,9

[grams per mile" (or "g/mi")]


Vehicle Type1

Loaded Vehicle Weight (lbs.)

Durability Vehicle Basis (mi)7

Model Year

Fleet Average

Non-Methane

Organic Gases2,3,4,5,6

PC and LDT

All

0-3750

50,000

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

0.250

0.231

0.225

0.202

0.157

0.113

0.073

LDT

3751-5750

50,000

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

0.320

0.295

0.287

0.260

0.205

0.150

0.099


1      "PC" means passenger cars.

        "LDT" means light-duty trucks.

        "TLEV" means transitional low-emission vehicle.

        "LEV" means low-emission vehicle.

        "ULEV" means ultra-low-emission vehicle.

        "LVW" means loaded vehicle weight.

2      "Non-Methane Organic Gases" (or "NMOG") means the total mass of oxygenated and non-oxygenated hydrocarbon emissions.

3      HEV Categories. For the purpose of calculating fleet average NMOG values, a manufacturer may adjust the certification levels of hybrid electric vehicles (or "HEVs") based on the range of the HEV without the use of the engine. For the purpose of calculating the adjusted NMOG emissions, the following definitions shall apply:

"Type A HEV" shall mean an HEV which achieves a minimum range of 60 miles over the All-Electric Range Test as defined in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 Through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), or in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d), as applicable.

"Type B HEV" shall mean an HEV which achieves a range of 40 - 59 miles over the All-Electric Range Test as defined in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 Through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), or in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d), as applicable.

"Type C HEV" shall mean an HEV which achieves a range of 0 - 39 miles over the All-Electric Range Test as defined in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 Through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), or in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d), as applicable, and all other HEVs excluding "Type A" and "Type B" HEVs.

        a.     For the purpose of calculating fleet average NMOG values, vehicles which have no tailpipe emissions but use fuel-fired heaters and which are not certified as ZEVs shall be treated as "Type A HEV ULEVs."

4      Calculation of Fleet Average NMOG Value (PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW). Each manufacturer’s fleet average NMOG value for the total number of PCs and LDTs from 0-3750 lbs. LVW produced and delivered for sale in California shall be calculated in units of g/mi NMOG according to the following equation, where the term "Produced" means produced and delivered for sale in California:

 

{[(L No. of Vehicles Certified to the Exhaust Emission Standards in section 1960.1 (e)(1) and Produced) x (0.39)] +

[L No. of Vehicles Certified to the Phase-In Exhaust Emission Standards in section 1960.1 (f)(1) and Produced x (0.25)] +

[L No. of Vehicles Certified to the Phase-Out Exhaust Emission Standards in section 1960.1 (f)(1) and Produced x (0.39)] +

[(L No. of Vehicles Certified to the Exhaust Emission Standards in section 1960.1(f)(2) and Produced) x (0.25)] +

[(L No. of TLEVs excluding HEVs and Produced) x (0.125)] +

[(L No. of LEVs excluding HEVs and Produced) x (0.075)] +

[(L No. of ULEVs excluding HEVs and Produced) x (0.040)] +

(HEV contribution factor)} ÷

(Total No. of Vehicles Produced, Including Zero-Emission Vehicles and HEVs):

a.     "HEV contribution factor" shall mean the NMOG emission contribution of HEVs to the fleet average NMOG value. The HEV contribution factor shall be calculated in units of g/mi as follows, where the term "Produced" means produced and delivered for sale in California:


HEV contribution factor =


        {[L No. of "Type A HEV" TLEVs Produced] x (0.100) +

         [L No. of "Type B HEV" TLEVs Produced] x (0.113) +

         [L No. of "Type C HEV" TLEVs Produced] x (0.125)} +

        {[L No. of "Type A HEV" LEVs Produced] x (0.057) +

         [L No. of "Type B HEV" LEVs Produced] x (0.066) +

         [L No. of "Type C HEV" LEVs Produced] x (0.075)} +

        {[L No. of "Type A HEV" ULEVs Produced] x (0.020) +

         [L No. of "Type B HEV" ULEVs Produced] x (0.030) +

         [L No. of "Type C HEV" ULEVs Produced] x (0.040)}

 

b.     "Zero-Emission Vehicles" (or "ZEVs") classified as LDTs 3751-5750 lbs. LVW which have been counted toward the ZEV requirements for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW as specified in note (9) shall be included in the equation of note (4).

c.     Beginning with the 1996 model year, manufacturers that produce and deliver for sale in California PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW that are certified to federal Tier I exhaust emission standards in 40 CFR 86.094-8 and 86.094-9 shall add the following term to the numerator of the fleet average NMOG equation in note (4) calculate their fleet average NMOG values accordingly:


[L No. of Vehicles Certified to federal Tier I exhaust emission standards and Produced) x (0.25)]

 

5      Calculation of Fleet Average NMOG Value (LDTs 3751-5750 lbs. LVW). Manufacturers that certify LDTs from 3751-5750 lbs. LVW, shall calculate a fleet average NMOG value in units of g/mi NMOG according to the following equation, where the term "Produced" means produced and delivered for sale in California:

 

{[(L No. of Vehicles Certified to the Exhaust Emission Standards in section 1960.1 (e)(1), and Produced x (0.50)] +

[(L No. of Vehicles Certified to the Phase-In Exhaust Emission Standards in section 1960.1 (f)(1), and Produced x (0.32)] +

[(L No. of Vehicles Certified to the Phase-Out Exhaust Emission Standards in section 1960.1 (f)(1), and Produced x (0.50)] +

[(L No. of Vehicles Certified to the Exhaust Emission Standards in section 1960.1 (f)(2), and Produced x (0.32)] +

[(L No. of TLEVs Produced excluding HEVs) x (0.160)] + [(L No. of LEVs Produced excluding HEVs) x (0.100)] +

[(L No. of ULEVs Produced excluding HEVs) x (0.050)] +

(HEV contribution factor)} ÷

(Total No. of Vehicles Produced, Including ZEVs and HEVs).

 

        a.     "HEV contribution factor" shall mean the NMOG emission contribution of HEVs to the fleet average NMOG. The HEV contribution factor shall be calculated in units of g/mi as follows, where the term "Produced" means produced and delivered for sale in California.

HEV contribution factor =


                {[L No. of "Type A HEV" TLEVs Produced] x (0.130) +

                 [L No. of "Type B HEV" TLEVs Produced] x (0.145) +

                 [L No. of "Type C HEV" TLEVs Produced] x (0.160)} +

                {[L No. of "Type A HEV" LEVs Produced] x (0.075) +

                 [L No. of "Type B HEV" LEVs Produced] x (0.087) +

                 [L No. of "Type C HEV" LEVs Produced] x (0.100)} +

                {[L No. of "Type A HEV" ULEVs Produced] x (0.025) +

                 [L No. of "Type B HEV" ULEVs Produced] x (0.037) +

                 [L No. of "Type C HEV" ULEVs Produced] x (0.050)}

 

        b.     Only ZEVs which have been certified as LDTs 3751-5750 lbs. LVW and which have not been counted toward the ZEV requirements for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW as specified in note (9) shall be included in the equation of note (5).

        c.     Beginning with the 1996 model year, manufacturers that produce and deliver for sale in California LDTs 3751-5750 lbs. LVW that are certified to the Tier I exhaust emission standards in 40 CFR 86.094-9 shall add the following term to the numerator of the fleet average NMOG equation in note (5) and calculate their fleet average NMOG values accordingly:

[(L No. of Vehicles Certified to federal Tier I exhaust emission standards and Produced and Delivered for Sale in California) x (0.32)]

6      Requirements for Small Volume Manufacturers. As used in this subsection, the term "small volume manufacturer" shall mean any vehicle manufacturer with California sales less than or equal to 3000 new PCs, LDTs and MDVs per model year based on the average number of vehicles sold by the manufacturer each model year from 1989 to 1991, except as noted below. For manufacturers certifying for the first time in California, model-year sales shall be based on projected California sales. In 2000 and subsequent model years, small volume manufacturers shall comply with the fleet average NMOG requirements set forth below.

        a.     Prior to the model year 2000, compliance with the specified fleet average NMOG requirements shall be waived.

        b.     In the 2000 model year, small volume manufacturers shall not exceed a fleet average NMOG value of 0.075 g/mi for PCs and LDTs from 0-3750 lbs. LVW calculated in accordance with note (4).

        c.     In the 2000 model year, small volume manufacturers shall not exceed a fleet average NMOG value of 0.100 g/mi for LDTs from 3751-5750 lbs. LVW calculated in accordance with note (5).

        d.     If a manufacturer’s average California sales exceeds 3000 units of new PCs, LDTs, and MDVs based on the average number of vehicles sold for any three consecutive model years, the manufacturer shall no longer be treated as a small volume manufacturer and shall comply with the fleet average requirements applicable for larger manufacturers as specified in section 1960.1(g)(2) beginning with the fourth model year after the last of the three consecutive model years.

        e.     If a manufacturer’s average California sales falls below 3000 units of new PCs, LDTs, and MDVs based on the average number of vehicles sold for any three consecutive model years, the manufacturer shall be treated as a small volume manufacturer and shall be subject to requirements for small volume manufacturers as specified in section 1960.1(g)(2) beginning with the next model year.


7      Calculation of NMOG Credits/Debits and Procedure for Offsetting Debits.

        a.     In 1992 through 2000 model years, manufacturers that achieve fleet average NMOG values lower than the fleet average NMOG requirement for the corresponding model year shall receive credits in units of g/mi NMOG determined as:

 

{[(Fleet Average NMOG Requirement) - (Manufacturer’s Fleet Average NMOG Value)] x (Total No. of Vehicles Produced and Delivered for Sale in California, Including ZEVs and HEVs)}.

 

Manufacturers with fleet average NMOG values greater than the fleet average requirement for the corresponding model year shall receive debits in units of g/mi NMOG equal to the amount of negative credits determined by the aforementioned equation. For any given model year, the total g/mi NMOG credits or debits earned for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW and for LDTs 3751-5750 lbs. LVW shall be summed together. The resulting amount shall constitute the g/mi NMOG credits or debits accrued by the manufacturer for the model year.

        b.     For the 1994 through 1997 model years, manufacturers shall equalize emission debits within three model years and prior to the end of the 1998 model year by earning g/mi NMOG emission credits in an amount equal to their g/mi NMOG debits, or by submitting a commensurate amount of g/mi NMOG credits to the Executive Officer that were earned previously or acquired from another manufacturer. For 1998 through 2000 model years, manufacturers shall equalize emission debits by the end of the following model year. If emission debits are not equalized within the specified time period, the manufacturer shall be subject to the Health and Safety Code section 43211 civil penalty applicable to a manufacturer which sells a new motor vehicle that does not meet the applicable emission standards adopted by the state board. The cause of action shall be deemed to accrue when the emission debits are not equalized by the end of the specified time period. For the purposes of Health and Safety Code section 43211, the number of vehicles not meeting the state board’s emission standards shall be determined by dividing the total amount of g/mi NMOG emission debits for the model year by the g/mi NMOG fleet average requirement for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW applicable for the model year in which the debits were first incurred.

        c.     The g/mi NMOG emission credits earned in any given model year shall retain full value through the subsequent model year. The g/mi NMOG value of any credits not used to equalize the previous model-year’s debit, shall be discounted by 50% at the beginning of the second model year after being earned, discounted to 25% of its original value if not used by the beginning of the third model year after being earned, and will have no value if not used by the beginning of the fourth model year after being earned.

        d.     In order to verify the status of a manufacturer’s compliance with the fleet average requirements for a given model year, and in order to confirm the accrual of NMOG credits or debits, each manufacturer shall submit an annual report to the Executive Officer which sets forth the production data used to establish compliance, by no later than March 1 of the calendar year following the close of the completed model year.

8      Credits for Pre-1994 Model-Year Vehicles. Manufacturers that produce and deliver for sale in California vehicles certified to the phase-in exhaust emission standards in section 1960.1 (f)(1), or vehicles certified to the exhaust emission standards in sections 1960.1(f)(2) or 1960.1(g)(1) and/or ZEVs, in the 1992 and 1993 model years, shall receive emission credits as determined by the equations in footnotes (4), (5), and (7).

        a.     For PCs and LDTs from 0-3750 lbs. LVW, the fleet average NMOG requirement for calculating a manufacturer’s emission credits shall be 0.390 and 0.334 g/mi NMOG for vehicles certified for the 1992 and 1993 model years, respectively.

        b.     For LDTs from 3751-5750 lbs. LVW, the fleet average NMOG requirement for calculating a manufacturer’s emission credits shall be 0.500 and 0.428 g/mi NMOG for vehicles certified for the 1992 and 1993 model years, respectively.

        c.     Emission credits earned prior to the 1994 model year shall be considered as earned in the 1994 model year and discounted in accordance with the schedule specified in footnote (7).


        (h)(1)      "Tier 1" Exhaust Emission Standards for MDVs. The exhaust emission from new 1995 through 2003 model Tier 1 medium-duty vehicles shall not exceed:


1995-2003 MODEL-YEAR TIER 1

MEDIUM-DUTY VEHICLE EXHAUST EMISION STANDARDS 1,2,3,7,8

(grams per mile)


Test Weight (lbs)

Durability Vehicle Basis (mi.)

Non-Methane Hydrocarbons4

Carbon Monoxide

Oxides of Nitrogen5

Particulates6

0-3,750

  50,000

0.25

3.4

0.4

n/a

0-3,750

120,000

0.36

5.0

0.55

0.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,751-5,750

  50,000

0.32

4.4

0.7

n/a

3.751-5,750

120,000

0.46

6.4

0.98

0.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,751-8,500

  50,000

0.39

5.0

1.1

n/a

5,751-8,500

120,000

0.56

7.3

1.53

0.12

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,501-10,000

  50,000

0.46

5.5

1.3

n/a

8,501-10,000

120,000

0.66

8.1

1.81

0.12

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,001-14,000

  50,000

0.60

7.0

2.0

n/a

10,001-14,000

120,000

0.86

  10.3

2.77

0.12


1      "n/a" means not applicable.

        "Test Weight" shall mean the average of the vehicle’s curb weight and gross vehicle weight.

2      Manufacturers have the option of certifying engines used in incomplete and diesel medium-duty vehicles from 8,501-14,000 pounds, gross vehicle weight to the heavy-duty engine standards and test procedures set forth in section 1956.8(e), Title 13, California Code of Regulations. Manufacturers certifying incomplete or diesel medium-duty vehicles to the heavy-duty engine standards and test procedures shall specify, in the application for certification, an in-use compliance test procedure, as provided in section 2139 (c), Title 13, California Code of Regulations.

3      For the 1995 model-year only, manufacturers of medium-duty vehicles may certify a maximum of 50 percent of their vehicles to the applicable 1994 model-year standards and test procedures. For the 1995 model-year only, small volume manufacturers may certify 100 percent of their vehicles to the applicable 1994 model-year standards and test procedures. The percentage shall be based upon each manufacturer’s projected sales of California-certified medium-duty vehicles.

4      For methanol- and ethanol-fueled vehicles certifying to these standards, including flexible-fueled vehicles when certifying on methanol or ethanol, "Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" shall mean "Organic Material Non-Methane Hydrocarbon Equivalent" (or "OMNMHCE").

5      The maximum projected emissions of oxides of nitrogen measured on the federal Highway Fuel Economy Test (HWFET; 40 CFR Part 600 Subpart B) shall be not greater than 2.00 times the applicable medium-duty vehicle standards shown in the table. Both the projected emissions and the HWFET standards shall be rounded in accordance with ASTM E29-67 to the nearest 0.1 g/mi before being compared.

6      Particulate standards are only applicable for diesel vehicles and shall be determined on a 120,000 mile basis.

7      In-use compliance testing shall be limited to vehicles with less than 90,000 miles. For the 1995 through 1997 models, alternative in-use compliance is available for medium-duty vehicle manufacturers. A manufacturer may use alternative in-use compliance for up to 100 percent of its fleet in the 1995 and 1996 model years and up to 50 percent of its fleet in the 1997 model year. Small volume manufacturers may use alternative in-use compliance for up to 100 percent of their fleets in the 1995 through 1997 model years. The percentages shall be determined from the manufacturers’ projected California sales of medium-duty vehicles. For vehicles certified to the standards and test procedures of this subsection, "alternative in-use compliance" shall consist of an in-use allowance of 25 percent over the applicable 1995 model-year non-methane hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen 50,000 mile emission standards and a waiver of the emission standards beyond 50,000 miles.

8      All medium-duty vehicles, except diesel-fueled vehicles and those incomplete and diesel vehicles certifying to heavy-duty engine test procedures, are subject to 50,000 mile and 120,000 mile non-methane hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen standards. Diesel-fueled vehicles shall be subject to 120,000 mile non-methane hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen, and particulate standards only.


        (h)(2)      "LEV I" Exhaust Emission Standards for MDVs. The exhaust emissions from new 1992 through 2006 model-year medium-duty LEV I low-emission vehicles, ultra-low-emission vehicles and super-ultra-low-emission vehicles shall not exceed:


LEV I EXHAUST EMISSION STANDARDS FOR

LOW-EMISSION VEHICLES, ULTRA-LOW-EMISSION VEHICLES

AND SUPER-ULTRA-LOW-EMISSION VEHICLES IN THE

MEDIUM-DUTY VEHICLE WEIGHT CLASS 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16

[grams per mile (or "g/mi")]


Test Weight (lbs.)

Durability Vehicle Basis (mi.)

Vehicle Emission Category2

Non-Methane Organic Gases3,4

Carbon Monoxide

Oxides of Nitrogen5

Particulates6,7

0-3,750

  50,000


120,000

LEV

ULEV

LEV

ULEV

0.125

0.075

0.180

0.107

3.4

1.7

5.0

2.5

0.4

0.2

0.6

0.3

n/a

n/a

0.08

0.04

3,751-5,750

  50,000



120,000

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

0.160

0.100

0.050

0.230

0.143

0.072

4.4

4.4

2.2

6.4

6.4

3.2

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.6

0.6

0.3

n/a

n/a

n/a

0.10

0.05

0.05

5,751-8,500

  50,000



120,000

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

0.195

0.117

0.059

0.280

0.167

0.084

5.0

5.0

2.5

7.3

7.3

3.7

0.6

0.6

0.3

0.9

0.9

0.45

n/a

n/a

n/a

0.12

0.06

0.06

8,501-10,000

  50,000



120,000

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

0.230

0.138

0.069

0.330

0.197

0.100

5.5

5.5

2.8

8.1

8.1

4.1

0.7

0.7

0.35

1.0

1.0

0.5

n/a

n/a

n/a

0.12

0.06

0.06

10,001-14,000

  50,000



120,000

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

0.300

0.180

0.09

0.430

0.257

0.130

7.0

7.0

3.5

10.3

10.3

5.2

1.0

1.0

0.5

1.5

1.5

0.7

n/a

n/a

n/a

0.12

0.06

0.06


1        "Test Weight" (or "TW") shall mean the average of the vehicle’s curb weight and gross vehicle weight.

2        "LEV" means low-emission vehicle.

        "ULEV" means ultra-low-emission vehicle.

        "SULEV" means super-ultra-low-emission vehicle.

3      Compliance with NMOG Standards. To determine compliance with an NMOG standard, NMOG emissions shall be measured in accordance with "California Non-Methane Organic Gas Test Procedures" adopted July 12, 1991 and last amended July 30, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.

        a.     Reactivity Adjustment. For LEVs and ULEVs certified to operate on an available fuel other than conventional gasoline, including fuel-flexible or dual-fuel vehicles when certifying on a fuel other than gasoline, manufacturers shall multiply the NMOG exhaust certification levels by the applicable reactivity adjustment factor set forth in Section 13 of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 Through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), or in section I.E.5. of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d), or established by the Executive Officer pursuant to Appendix VIII or section II.D. respectively of the foregoing test procedures. In addition, natural gas vehicles certifying to LEV or ULEV standards shall calculate a reactivity-adjusted methane exhaust emission value by multiplying the methane exhaust certification level by the applicable methane reactivity adjustment factor set forth in section 13 or in section I.E.5. of the above-referenced test procedures as applicable. The product of the exhaust NMOG certification levels and the reactivity adjustment factor shall be compared to the exhaust NMOG mass emission standard established for the particular vehicle emission category to determine compliance. For natural gas vehicles, the reactivity-adjusted NMOG value shall be added to the reactivity-adjusted methane value and then compared to the exhaust NMOG mass emission standards established for the particular vehicle emission category to determine compliance.

        b.     Pre-1998 NOx standards. Prior to the 1998 model year, the 50,000 mile and 120,000 mile LEV exhaust mass emission standards for NOx shall be: 0.7 and 1.0 g/mi for MDVs from 3751-5750 lbs. TW, 1.1 and 1.5 g/mi for MDVs from 5751-8500 lbs. TW, 1.3 and 1.8 g/mi for MDVs from 8501-10,000 lbs. TW, and 2.0 and 2.8 g/mi for MDVs from 10,001-14,000 lbs. TW, respectively.

4      NMOG Standards for Fuel-Flexible and Dual-Fuel Vehicles. Fuel-flexible and dual-fuel "Medium-Duty Vehicles" (or "MDVs") from 0-14,000 lbs. TW shall be certified to exhaust mass emission standards for NMOG established for the operation of the vehicle on a fuel other than gasoline, and gasoline.

        a.     Reactivity Adjustment. For LEVs and ULEVs when certifying on the fuel other than gasoline, manufacturers shall multiply the exhaust NMOG certification levels by the applicable reactivity adjustment factor. In addition to multiplying the exhaust NMOG certification levels by the applicable reactivity adjustment factor, the exhaust methane certification level for natural gas vehicles shall be multiplied by the applicable methane reactivity adjustment factor and the resulting value shall be added to the reactivity-adjusted NMOG value. When certifying on gasoline, the exhaust NMOG certification levels of fuel-flexible and dual-fuel vehicles shall not be multiplied by a reactivity adjustment factor.

        b.     Standards for Fuel-Flexible and Dual-Fuel Vehicles Operating on Gasoline. For MDVs from 0-14,000 lbs. TW, the applicable exhaust mass emission standard for NMOG when certifying the vehicle for operation on gasoline shall be:


Test Weight(lbs.)

Vehicle Emission Category

50,000

(g/mi)

120,000

(g/mi)

0-3750

LEV

0.25

0.36

ULEV

0.125

0.18

3751-5750

LEV

0.32

0.46

ULEV

0.16

0.23

SULEV

0.1

0.143

5751-8500

LEV

0.39

0.56

ULEV

0.195

0.28

SULEV

0.117

0.167

8501-10,000

LEV

0.46

0.66

ULEV

0.23

0.33

SULEV

0.138

0.197

10,001-14,000

LEV

0.6

0.86

ULEV

0.3

0.43

SULEV

0.18

0.257

 

5      Highway NOx. The maximum projected emissions of "Oxides of Nitrogen" (or "NOx") measured on the federal Highway Fuel Economy Test (HWFET; 40 CFR Part 600 Subpart B) shall not be greater than 2.00 times the applicable MDV standards shown in the table. Both the projected emissions and the HWFET standard shall be rounded in accordance with ASTM E29-67 to the nearest 0.1 g/mi before being compared.

6      Particulate standards are only applicable for diesel vehicles and shall be determined on a 120,000 mile basis.

7      "n/a" means not applicable.

8      Certification of Incomplete and Diesel Vehicles. Manufacturers have the option of certifying engines used in incomplete and diesel MDVs to the heavy-duty engine standards and test procedures set forth in Section 1956.8(g) or (h), Title 13, California Code of Regulations. Manufacturers certifying incomplete or diesel MDVs to the heavy-duty engine standards and test procedures shall specify in the application for certification an in-use compliance procedure as provided in Section 2139(c), Title 13, California Code of Regulations. For diesel vehicles certifying to the standards set forth in Title 13, section 1960.1(h)(2), "NMOG" shall mean non-methane hydrocarbons.

9        Intermediate In-Use Compliance Standards. The following intermediate in-use compliance standards for 50,000 miles and 120,000 miles for MDVs from 3751-14,000 lbs. TW, including fuel-flexible and dual-fuel vehicles when operating on an available fuel other than gasoline, shall apply for the specified model years only:


Intermediate In-Use Compliance Standards*

(in grams per mile)

Emission Category

Model Year

Durability Vehicle Basis (mi)

3751-5750 lbs.

5751 - 8500 lbs.

8501-10,000 lbs.

10,001-14,000 lbs.

NMOG

NOx

NMOG

NOx

NMOG

NOx

NMOG

NOx

LEV

through 1997

50,000

0.238

0.7

0.293

1.1

0.345

1.3

0.45

2

1998-1999

50,000

0.238

0.6

0.293

0.9

0.345

1

0.45

1.5

2000

50,000

--

0.6

--

0.9

--

1

--

1.5

2000

120,000

--

0.8

--

1.2

--

1.3

--

2

ULEV

through 1999

50,000

0.128

0.6

0.156

0.9

0.184

1

0.24

1.5

2000

50,000

0.128

0.6

0.156

0.9

0.184

1

0.24

1.5

2000

120,000

0.16

0.8

0.195

1.2

0.23

1.3

0.3

2

2001-2002

50,000

0.128

--

0.156

--

0.184

--

0.24

--

2001-2002

120,000

0.16

 --

0.195

 --

0.23

 --

0.3

 --

SULEV

through 2002

50,000

0.072

0.3

0.084

0.45

0.1

0.5

0.13

0.7

2002

120,000

0.1

0.4

0.117

0.6

0.138

0.65

0.18

1


In-use compliance with standards beyond 50,000 miles shall be waived through the 1999 model year for LEVs and ULEVs and through the 2001 model year for SULEVs.

*Dashes mean that the standard in the section (h)(2) table applies.

 

a.     Reactivity Adjustment. For LEVs and ULEVs designed to operate on an available fuel other than conventional gasoline, including fuel-flexible and dual-fuel vehicles when operating on an available fuel other than gasoline, NMOG exhaust mass emission results shall be multiplied by the applicable reactivity adjustment factor to determine compliance with intermediate in-use compliance standards for NMOG. In addition to multiplying the exhaust NMOG mass emission results by the applicable reactivity adjustment factor, natural gas vehicles shall multiply the exhaust methane mass emission results by the applicable methane reactivity adjustment factor and add that value to the reactivity-adjusted NMOG value. For fuel-flexible and dual-fuel vehicles when operating on gasoline, NMOG emission results shall not be multiplied by a reactivity adjustment factor.

b.     Gasoline Standards for Fuel-Flexible and Dual-Fuel Vehicles. For fuel-flexible and dual-fuel MDVs from 0-14,000 lbs. TW, intermediate in-use compliance standards for NMOG emissions at 50,000 miles, when the vehicle is operated on gasoline, shall be:


Fuel-Flexible and Dual-Fuel MDVs

Intermediate In-Use Compliance Standards

Test Weight (lbs.)

Vehicle Emission Category

50,000 (g/mi)

0-3750

LEV

0.32

ULEV

0.188

3751-5750

LEV

0.41

ULEV

0.238

SULEV

0.128

5751-8500

LEV

0.49

ULEV

0.293

SULEV

0.156

8501-10,000

LEV

0.58

ULEV

0.345

SULEV

0.184

10,001-14,000

LEV

0.75

ULEV

0.45

SULEV

0.24


Intermediate in-use compliance standards shall apply to LEVs and ULEVs through the 1999 model year and to SULEVs through the 2001 model year. Compliance with the standards beyond 50,000 miles shall be waived through the 1999 model year for LEVs and ULEVs and through the 2001 model year for SULEVs.

10    Medium-Duty Vehicle Phase-In Requirements. Each manufacturer’s MDV fleet shall be defined as the total number of California certified MDVs from 0-14,000 lbs. TW produced and delivered for sale in California.

 

        a.     Manufacturers of MDVs shall certify an equivalent percentage of their MDV fleet according to the following phase-in schedule:


Model Year

Vehicles Certified to Title 13 CCR Section 1960.1(h)(1) or (h)(2)

(%)

Vehicles Certified to Title 13 CCR Section 1956.8(g) or (h)

(%)

 

Tier 1

LEV

ULEV

Tier 1

LEV

ULEV

1998

73

25

2

100

0

0

1999

48

50

2

100

0

0

2000

23

75

2

100

0

0


b.     [Reserved]

c.     The percentages shall be applied to the manufacturers’ total production of California-certified medium-duty vehicles delivered for sale in California.

d.     These requirements shall not apply to small volume manufacturers. Small volume manufacturers shall comply with the requirements of note (16) below.

11    Definition of HEV. For the purpose of calculating "Vehicle Equivalent Credits" (or "VECs"), the contribution of hybrid electric vehicles (or "HEVs") will be calculated based on the range of the HEV without the use of the engine. For purpose of calculating the contribution of HEVs to the VECs, the following definitions shall apply:

"Type A HEV" shall mean an HEV which achieves a minimum range of 60 miles over the All-Electric Range Test as defined in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 Through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), or in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d), as applicable.

"Type B HEV" shall mean an HEV which achieves a range of 40 - 59 miles over the All-Electric Range Test as defined in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 Through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), or in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d), as applicable.

"Type C HEV" shall mean an HEV which achieves a range of 0 - 39 miles over the All-Electric Range Test as defined in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 Through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), or in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d), as applicable, and all other HEVs excluding "Type A" and "Type B" HEVs.

12    Calculation of Vehicle Equivalent Credits. In 1992 through 2000 model years, manufacturers that produce and deliver for sale in California MDVs in excess of the equivalent requirements for LEVs and/or ULEVs certified to the exhaust emission standards set forth in this section (h)(2) or Title 13, CCR Section 1956.8(h), shall receive VECs calculated in accordance with the following equation, where the term "Produced" means produced and delivered for sale in California:

        {[(L No. of LEVs Produced excluding HEVs) + (L No. of "Type C HEV" LEVs Produced)] +

        [(L No. of "Type A HEV" LEVs Produced) x (1.2)] +

        [(No of "Type B HEV" LEVs Produced) x (1.1)] -

        (Equivalent L No. of LEVs Required to be Produced)} +

        {(1.4) x [(L No. of ULEVs Produced excluding HEVs) + (L No. of "Type C HEV" ULEVs Produced)] +

        [(1.7) x (L No. of "Type A HEV" ULEVs Produced)] +

        [(1.5) x (L No. of "Type B HEV" ULEVs Produced)] -

        [(1.4) x (Equivalent L No. of ULEVs Required to be Produced)]} +

        {[(1.7) x [(L No. of SULEVs Produced excluding HEVs) + (L No. of "Type C HEV" SULEVs Produced)] +

        [(L No. of "Type A HEV" SULEVs Produced) x (1.7)] +

        [(L No. of "Type B HEV" SULEVs) x (1.5)] -

        [(1.7) x [(Equivalent L No. of SULEVs Required to be Produced)]} +

        [(2.0) x (L No. of ZEVs Certified and Produced as MDVs)].

 

a.     Manufacturers that fail to produce and deliver for sale in California the equivalent quantity of MDVs certified to LEV and/or ULEV exhaust emission standards, shall receive "Vehicle-Equivalent Debits" (or "VEDs") equal to the amount of negative VECs determined by the aforementioned equation.

b.     Manufacturers shall equalize emission debits within one model year by earning VECs in an amount equal to their previous model-year’s total of VEDs, or by submitting a commensurate amount of VECs to the Executive Officer that were earned previously or acquired from another manufacturer. Any manufacturer which fails to equalize emission debits within the specified time period shall be subject to the Health and Safety Code civil penalty applicable to a manufacturer which sells a new motor vehicle that does not meet the applicable emission standards adopted by the state board. The cause of action shall be deemed to accrue when the emission debits are not equalized by the end of the specified time period. For the purposes of Health and Safety Code section 43211, the number of vehicles not meeting the state board’s emission standards shall be equal to the amount of VEDs incurred.

c.     The VECs earned in any given model year shall retain full value through the subsequent model year.

d.     The value of any VECs not used to equalize the previous model-year’s debit, shall be discounted by 50% at the beginning of second model year after being earned, discounted to 25% of its original value if not used by the beginning of the third model year after being earned, and will have no value if not used by the beginning of the fourth model year after being earned.

e.     Any VECs earned prior to the 1998 model year shall be treated as earned in the 1998 model year and discounted in accordance with the schedule specified in note (12)(d).

f.     Only ZEVs certified as MDVs shall be included in the calculation of VECs.

g.     In order to verify the status of a manufacturer’s compliance with the phase-in requirements of this section and in order to confirm the accrual of VECs or VEDs, each manufacturer shall submit an annual report to the Executive Officer which sets forth the production data used to establish compliance by no later than March 1 of the calendar year following the close of the model year.

13    50oF Requirement. Manufacturers shall demonstrate compliance with the above standards for NMOG, carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen at 50oF, according to the procedure specified in section 11k of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 Through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), or according to the procedure specified in section II.C. of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d), as applicable. Hybrid electric, natural gas and diesel-fueled vehicles shall be exempt from 50oF test requirements.

14    In-use compliance testing shall be limited to vehicles with fewer than 90,000 miles.

15    HEV Requirements. Deterioration factors for hybrid electric vehicles shall be based on the emissions and mileage accumulation of the auxiliary power unit. For certification purposes only, Type A hybrid electric vehicles shall demonstrate compliance with 50,000 mile emission standards (using 50,000 mile deterioration factors), and demonstrating compliance with 120,000 mile emission standards shall not be required. For certification purposes only, Type B hybrid electric vehicles shall demonstrate compliance with 50,000 mile emission standards (using 50,000 mile deterioration factors) and 120,000 mile emission standards (using 90,000 mile deterioration factors). For certification purposes only, Type C hybrid electric vehicles shall demonstrate compliance with 50,000 mile emission standards (using 50,000 mile deterioration factors) and 120,000 mile emission standards (using 120,000 mile deterioration factors).

16    Requirements for Small Volume Manufacturers. As used in Section 1960.1(h)(2), the term "small volume manufacturer" shall mean any vehicle manufacturer with California sales less than or equal to 3000 new PCs, LDTs, and MDVs per model year based on the average number of vehicles sold by the manufacturer each model year from 1992 to 1994, except as otherwise noted below. For manufacturers certifying for the first time in California, model-year sales shall be based on projected California sales.

        a.     Prior to the model year 2001, small volume manufacturers shall not be required to certify, produce, or deliver LEVs and ULEVs for sale in California.

        b.     If a manufacturer’s average California sales exceeds 3000 units of new PCs, LDTs, and MDVs based on the average number of vehicles sold for any three consecutive model years, the manufacturer shall no longer be treated as a small volume manufacturer and shall comply with the LEV and ULEV requirements applicable for larger manufacturers as specified in Section 1960.1(h)(2) beginning with the fourth model year after the last of the three consecutive model years.

        c.     If a manufacturer’s average California sales falls below 3000 units of new PCs, LDTs, and MDVs based on the average number of vehicles sold for any three consecutive model years, the manufacturer shall be treated as a small volume manufacturer and shall be subject to requirements for small volume manufacturers as specified in Section 1960.1(h)(2) beginning with the next model year.


        (i) [Not applicable after December 31, 1990]


        (j) For Option 1 in the tables in sections (f)(1) and (f)(2), the hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide compliance shall be determined on a 50,000-mile durability basis. For Option 2 in the table in section (f)(2), the hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide compliance shall be determined on a 100,000-mile durability basis.


        (k) The test procedures for determining compliance with these standards are set forth in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1981 through 1987 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles," adopted by the state board on November 23, 1976, as last amended May 20, 1987, and in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles," adopted by the state board on May 20, 1987 as last amended August 5, 1999, both which are incorporated herein by reference, and in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles," as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d). The test procedures for determining the compliance of 2001 through 2006 model-year hybrid electric vehicles with the standards set forth in this section are set forth in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2005 and Subsequent Model Zero-Emission Vehicles, and 2001 and Subsequent Model Hybrid Electric Vehicles, in the Passenger Car, Light-Duty Truck, and Medium-Duty Vehicle Classes, as incorporated by reference in section 1962(h).


        (l) With respect to any new vehicle required to comply with the standards set forth in paragraphs (a) through (h), the manufacturer’s written maintenance instructions for in-use vehicles shall not require scheduled maintenance more frequently than or beyond the scope of maintenance permitted under the test procedures referenced in paragraph (k) above. Any failure to perform scheduled maintenance shall not excuse an emissions violation unless the failure is related to or causative of the violation.

        (m) Any 1982, 1983, and 1984 model year vehicle required to comply with the standards set forth in paragraphs (b), (c), (d), and (f) which is subject to a standard set by federal law or regulation controlling emissions of particulate matter must conform to such standard.

        (n) For purposes of section 1960.1(a) through (f), section 1960.1(h)(1), and section 1960.1.5, "small volume manufacturer" for the 2000 and earlier model years is any vehicle manufacturer which was subject to "in lieu" standards pursuant to section 202(b)(1)(B) of the Federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. section 7521(b)(1)(B), as amended November 16, 1977) or a vehicle manufacturer with California sales not exceeding 3,000 new motor vehicles per model year based on previous model-year sales; however, for manufacturers certifying for the first time in California model year sales shall be based on projected California sales.

        (o) [Reserved]

        (p) The cold temperature exhaust carbon monoxide emission levels from new 1996 through 2000 and subsequent model-year passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles shall not exceed:


1996 AND SUBSEQUENT MODEL-YEAR COLD TEMPERATURE CARBON

MONOXIDE EXHAUST EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR PASSENGER CARS,

LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS, AND MEDIUM-DUTY VEHICLES 1,2

(grams per mile)


Vehicle Type

Loaded Vehicle Weight (lbs)

Durability Vehicle Basis (mi.)

Carbon Monoxide

Passenger Car

All

50,000

10.0

Light-Duty Truck

0-3750

50,000

10.0

Light-Duty Truck

3751-5750

50,000

12.5

Medium-Duty Vehicle

0-3750

50,000

10.0

Medium-Duty Vehicle

3751-85003

50,000

12.5

 

1      These standards are applicable to vehicles tested in accordance with 40 CFR Part 86 Subpart C, at a nominal temperature of 200F (-70C).

2      Natural gas vehicles, diesel-fueled vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, and zero-emission vehicles are exempt from these standards.

3      Medium-duty vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 8,500 lbs. are exempt from this standard.


        (q) The Supplemental Federal Test Procedure (SFTP) exhaust emission levels from new 2001 and subsequent model passenger cars and light-duty trucks, other than low-emission vehicles, ultra-low-emission vehicles, and zero-emission vehicles, shall not exceed:


SFTP EXHAUST EMISSION STANDARDS FOR 2001 AND SUBSEQUENT

MODEL-YEAR PASSENGER CARS AND LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS

OTHER THAN LOW-EMISSION VEHICLES, ULTRA-LOW-EMISSION

VEHICLES, AND ZERO-EMISSION VEHICLES

(grams per mile)4,5,6,7,8,9,10




Vehicle

Type1


Loaded

Vehicle

Weight (lbs.)


Durability

Vehicle

Basis (mi)



Fuel Type


NMHC2 +

NOx1 Composite3

CO1

A/C1

Test

US061 Test

Composite Option3

PC

All

50,000

Gasoline

0.65

3

9

3.4

Diesel

1.48

NA

9

3.4

100,000

Gasoline

0.91

3.7

11.1

4.2

Diesel

2.07

NA

11.1

4.2

LDT

0-3750

50,000

Gasoline

0.65

3

9

3.4

Diesel

1.48

NA

9

3.4

100,000

Gasoline

0.91

3.7

11.1

4.2

Diesel

2.07

NA

11.1

4.2

LDT

3751-5750

50,000

Gasoline

1.02

3.9

11.6

4.4

Diesel

NA

NA

NA

NA

100,000

Gasoline

1.37

4.9

14.6

5.5

Diesel

NA

NA

NA

NA


1      Abbreviations.

        "PC" means passenger car.

        "LDT" means light-duty truck.

        "NMHC+NOx" means non-methane hydrocarbon plus oxides of nitrogen emissions.

        "CO" means carbon monoxide emissions.

        "A/C" means air-conditioning.

        "US06" means the test cycle designed to evaluate emissions during aggressive and microtransient driving.

2      Non-Methane Hydrocarbon Emissions. For PCs and LDTs certified to the FTP exhaust standards in section 1960.1(f)(2), hydrocarbon emissions shall be measured in accordance with the "California Non-Methane Hydrocarbon Test Procedures" as last amended May 15, 1990, which is incorporated herein by reference. For PCs and LDTs certified as transitional low-emission vehicles, hydrocarbon emissions shall be measured in accordance with Part B (Determination of Non-Methane Hydrocarbon Mass Emissions by Flame Ionization Detection) of the "California Non-Methane Organic Gas Test Procedures" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(g)(1), note (3). For alcohol-fueled vehicles certifying to these standards, including flexible-fuel vehicles when certifying on methanol or ethanol, "Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" shall mean "Organic Material Non-Methane Hydrocarbon Equivalent."

3      Composite Standards. Compliance with the composite standards shall be demonstrated using the calculations set forth in the section 86.164-00, Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, as adopted October 22, 1996, which is incorporated herein by reference.

4      SFTP. SFTP means the additional test procedure designed to measure emissions during aggressive and microtransient driving, as described in section 86.159-00, Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, as adopted October 22, 1996, over the US06 cycle, and also the test procedure designed to measure urban driving emissions while the vehicle’s air conditioning system is operating, as described in section 86.160-00, Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, as adopted October 22, 1996, over the SC03 cycle. These sections of the Code of Federal Regulations are incorporated herein by reference.

5      Applicability to Alternative Fuel Vehicles. These SFTP standards do not apply to vehicles certified on fuels other than gasoline and diesel fuel, but the standards do apply to the gasoline and diesel fuel operation of flexible-fuel vehicles and dual-fuel vehicles.

6      Air to Fuel Ratio Requirement. With the exception of cold-start conditions, warm-up conditions and rapid-throttle motion conditions ("tip-in" or "tip-out" conditions), the air to fuel ratio shall not be richer at any time than, for a given engine operating condition (e.g., engine speed, manifold pressure, coolant temperature, air charge temperature, and any other parameters), the leanest air to fuel mixture required to obtain maximum torque (lean best torque), with a tolerance of six percent of the fuel consumption. The Executive Officer may approve a manufacturer’s request for approval to use additional enrichment in subsequent testing if the manufacturer demonstrates that additional enrichment is needed to protect the vehicle, occupants, engine, or emission control hardware.

7      A/C-on Specific Calibrations. A/C-on specific calibrations (e.g. air to fuel ratio, spark timing, and exhaust gas recirculation), may be used which differ from A/C-off calibrations for given engine operating conditions (e.g., engine speed, manifold pressure, coolant temperature, air charge temperature, and any other parameters). Such calibrations must not unnecessarily reduce the NMHC+NOx emission control effectiveness during A/C-on operation when the vehicle is operated under conditions which may reasonably be expected to be encountered during normal operation and use. If reductions in control system NMHC+NOx effectiveness do occur as a result of such calibrations, the manufacturer shall, in the Application for Certification, specify the circumstances under which such reductions do occur, and the reason for the use of such calibrations resulting in such reductions in control system effectiveness.

 

A/C-on specific "open-loop" or "commanded enrichment" air-fuel enrichment strategies (as defined below), which differ from A/C-off "open-loop" or "commanded enrichment" air-fuel enrichment strategies, may not be used, with the following exceptions: cold-start and warm-up conditions, or, subject to Executive Officer approval, conditions requiring the protection of the vehicle, occupants, engine, or emission control hardware. Other than these exceptions, such strategies which are invoked based on manifold pressure, engine speed, throttle position, or other engine parameters shall use the same engine parameter criteria for the invoking of this air-fuel enrichment strategy and the same degree of enrichment regardless of whether the A/C is on or off.

 

"Open-loop" or "commanded" air-fuel enrichment strategy is defined as enrichment of the air to fuel ratio beyond stoichiometry for the purposes of increasing engine power output and the protection of engine or emissions control hardware. However, "closed-loop biasing," defined as small changes in the air-fuel ratio for the purposes of optimizing vehicle emissions or driveability, shall not be considered an "open-loop" or "commanded" air-fuel enrichment strategy. In addition, "transient" air-fuel enrichment strategy (or "tip-in" and "tip-out" enrichment), defined as the temporary use of an air-fuel ratio rich of stoichiometry at the beginning or duration of rapid throttle motion, shall not be considered an "open-loop" or "commanded" air-fuel enrichment strategy.

 

8      "Lean-On-Cruise" Calibration Strategies. In the Application for Certification, the manufacturer shall state whether any "lean-on-cruise" strategies are incorporated into the vehicle design. A "lean-on-cruise" air-fuel calibration strategy is defined as the use of an air-fuel ratio significantly greater than stoichiometry, during non-deceleration conditions at speeds above 40 mph. "Lean-on-cruise" air-fuel calibration strategies shall not be employed during vehicle operation in normal driving conditions, including A/C-usage, unless at least one of the following conditions is met:


        1.     Such strategies are substantially employed during the FTP or SFTP, or

        2.     Such strategies are demonstrated not to significantly reduce vehicle NMHC+NOx emission control effectiveness over the operating conditions in which they are employed, or

        3.     Such strategies are demonstrated to be necessary to protect the vehicle, occupants, engine, or emission control hardware.

 

If the manufacturer proposes to use a "lean-on-cruise" calibration strategy, the manufacturer shall specify the circumstances under which such a calibration would be used, and the reason or reasons for the proposed use of such a calibration.

 

The above provisions shall not apply to vehicles powered by "lean-burn" engines or Diesel-cycle engines. A "lean-burn" engine is defined as an Otto-cycle engine designed to run at an air-fuel ratio significantly greater than stoichiometry during the large majority of its operation.

 

9      Phase-In Requirements. For the purposes of this section 1960.1(q) only, each manufacturer’s PC and LDT fleet shall be defined as the total projected number of PCs and LDTs from 0-5750 pounds loaded vehicle weight certified to the FTP exhaust standards of section 1960.1(f)(2) and certified as transitional low-emission vehicles sold in California. As an option, a manufacturer may elect to have its total PC and LDT fleet defined, for the purposes of this section 1960.1(q) only, as the total projected number of the manufacturer’s PCs and LDTs, other than zero-emission vehicles, certified and sold in California.

 

        a.     Manufacturers of PCs and of LDTs, except small volume manufacturers, shall certify a minimum percentage of their PC and LDT fleet according to the following phase-in schedule.


Model Year

Percentage of PC and LDT Fleet

2001

25

2002

50

2003

85

2004 and subsequent

100

 

        b.     Small volume manufacturers of PCs and LDTs shall certify 100% of their PC and LDT fleet in the 2004 and subsequent model years.

 

10    Single-Roll Electric Dynamometer Requirement. For all vehicles certified to the SFTP standards, a single-roll electric dynamometer or a dynamometer which produces equivalent results, as set forth in the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), must be used for all types of emission testing to determine compliance with the associated emission standards.


        (r) The Supplemental Federal Test Procedure (SFTP) standards in this section represent the maximum SFTP exhaust emissions at 4,000 miles + 250 miles or at the mileage determined by the manufacturer for emission-data vehicles in accordance with the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 Through 2000 Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles," as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), and with the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles," as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d). The SFTP exhaust emission levels from new 2001 and subsequent model low-emission vehicles, ultra-low-emission vehicles and super-ultra-low-emission vehicles in the passenger car and light-duty truck class, and new 2003 and subsequent low-emission vehicles, ultra-low-emission vehicles, and super-ultra-low-emission vehicles in the medium-duty class, shall not exceed:

________________________________________________________________________


SFTP EXHAUST EMISSION STANDARDS

FOR LOW-EMISSION VEHICLES, ULTRA-LOW-EMISSION VEHICLES, AND SUPER-ULTRA-LOW-EMISSION VEHICLES IN THE PASSENGER CAR, LIGHT-DUTY TRUCK, AND MEDIUM-DUTY VEHICLE CLASSES

(grams per mile)6,7,8,9,10,11


Vehicle

Type1

Loaded Vehicle

Weight (lbs.)2

US06 Test1

A/C Test1,5

NMHC4 + NOx1

CO1

NMHC4 + NOx1

CO1

PC

All

0.14

8

0.2

2.7

LDT

0-3750

0.14

8

0.2

2.7

LDT

3751-5750

0.25

10.5

0.27

3.5

MDV

3751-5750

0.4

10.5

0.31

3.5

MDV

5751-85003

0.6

11.8

0.44

4

 

1      Abbreviations and Definitions. For the purposes of this SFTP standards table only, the following abbreviations and definitions apply:

"PC" means passenger car.

"LDT" means light-duty truck, defined as any motor vehicle rated at 6,000 pounds gross vehicle weight or less, which is designed primarily for purposes of transportation of property or is a derivative of such a vehicle, or is available with special features enabling off-street or off-highway operation and use.

"MDV" means medium-duty truck, defined as any motor vehicle having a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating of greater than 6,000 pounds and less than 14,001 pounds, except passenger cars.

"NMHC+NOx" means non-methane hydrocarbon plus oxides of nitrogen emissions.

"CO" means carbon monoxide emissions.

"US06" means the test cycle designed to evaluate emissions during aggressive and microtransient driving.

"A/C" means air-conditioning.

2      For MDVs, "Loaded Vehicle Weight" shall mean "Test Weight," which is the average of the vehicle’s curb weight and gross vehicle weight.

3      Vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating over 8,500 pounds are exempted from the requirements of this subsection.

4      Non-Methane Hydrocarbon Emissions. Hydrocarbon emissions shall be measured in accordance with Part B (Determination of Non-Methane Hydrocarbon Mass Emissions by Flame Ionization Detection) of the "California Non-Methane Organic Gas Test Procedures" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(g)(1), note (3). For alcohol-fueled vehicles certifying to these standards, including flexible-fuel vehicles when certifying on methanol or ethanol, "Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" shall mean "Organic Material Non-Methane Hydrocarbon Equivalent."

5      A/C-on Specific Calibrations. A/C-on specific calibrations (e.g. air to fuel ratio, spark timing, and exhaust gas recirculation), may be used which differ from A/C-off calibrations for given engine operating conditions (e.g., engine speed, manifold pressure, coolant temperature, air charge temperature, and any other parameters). Such calibrations must not unnecessarily reduce the NMHC+NOx emission control effectiveness during A/C-on operation when the vehicle is operated under conditions which may reasonably be expected to be encountered during normal operation and use. If reductions in control system NMHC+NOx effectiveness do occur as a result of such calibrations, the manufacturer shall, in the Application for Certification, specify the circumstances under which such reductions do occur, and the reason for the use of such calibrations resulting in such reductions in control system effectiveness.

 

A/C-on specific "open-loop" or "commanded enrichment" air-fuel enrichment strategies (as defined below), which differ from A/C-off "open-loop" or "commanded enrichment" air-fuel enrichment strategies, may not be used, with the following exceptions: cold-start and warm-up conditions, or, subject to Executive Officer approval, conditions requiring the protection of the vehicle, occupants, engine, or emission control hardware. Other than these exceptions, such strategies which are invoked based on manifold pressure, engine speed, throttle position, or other engine parameters shall use the same engine parameter criteria for the invoking of this air-fuel enrichment strategy and the same degree of enrichment regardless of whether the A/C is on or off.

 

"Open-loop" or "commanded" air-fuel enrichment strategy is defined as enrichment of the air to fuel ratio beyond stoichiometry for the purposes of increasing engine power output and the protection of engine or emissions control hardware. However, "closed-loop biasing," defined as small changes in the air-fuel ratio for the purposes of optimizing vehicle emissions or driveability, shall not be considered an "open-loop" or "commanded" air-fuel enrichment strategy. In addition, "transient" air-fuel enrichment strategy (or "tip-in" and "tip-out" enrichment), defined as the temporary use of an air-fuel ratio rich of stoichiometry at the beginning or duration of rapid throttle motion, shall not be considered an "open-loop" or "commanded" air-fuel enrichment strategy.

 

6      SFTP. SFTP means the additional test procedure designed to measure emissions during aggressive and microtransient driving, as described in section 86.159-00, Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, as adopted October 22, 1996, over the US06 cycle, and also the test procedure designed to measure urban driving emissions while the vehicle’s air conditioning system is operating, as described in section 86.160-00, Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, as adopted October 22, 1996, over the SC03 cycle. These sections of the Code of Federal Regulations are incorporated herein by reference.

7      Applicability to Alternative Fuel Vehicles. These SFTP standards do not apply to vehicles certified on fuels other than gasoline and diesel fuel, but the standards do apply to the gasoline and diesel fuel operation of flexible-fuel vehicles and dual-fuel vehicles.

8      Air to Fuel Ratio Requirement. With the exception of cold-start conditions, warm-up conditions and rapid-throttle motion conditions ("tip-in" or "tip-out" conditions), the air to fuel ratio shall not be richer at any time than, for a given engine operating condition (e.g., engine speed, manifold pressure, coolant temperature, air charge temperature, and any other parameters), the leanest air to fuel mixture required to obtain maximum torque (lean best torque), with a tolerance of six percent of the fuel consumption. The Executive Officer may approve a manufacturer’s request for approval to use additional enrichment in subsequent testing if the manufacturer demonstrates that additional enrichment is needed to protect the vehicle, occupants, engine, or emission control hardware.

9      "Lean-On-Cruise" Calibration Strategies. In the Application for Certification, the manufacturer shall state whether any "lean-on-cruise" strategies are incorporated into the vehicle design. A "lean-on-cruise" air-fuel calibration strategy is defined as the use of an air-fuel ratio significantly greater than stoichiometry, during non-deceleration conditions at speeds above 40 mph. "Lean-on-cruise" air-fuel calibration strategies shall not be employed during vehicle operation in normal driving conditions, including A/C-usage, unless at least one of the following conditions is met:


        1.     Such strategies are substantially employed during the FTP or SFTP, or

        2.     Such strategies are demonstrated not to significantly reduce vehicle NMHC+NOx emission control effectiveness over the operating conditions in which they are employed, or

        3.     Such strategies are demonstrated to be necessary to protect the vehicle, occupants, engine, or emission control hardware.

 

If the manufacturer proposes to use a "lean-on-cruise" calibration strategy, the manufacturer shall specify the circumstances under which such a calibration would be used, and the reason or reasons for the proposed use of such a calibration.

 

The above provisions shall not apply to vehicles powered by "lean-burn" engines or Diesel-cycle engines. A "lean-burn" engine is defined as an Otto-cycle engine designed to run at an air-fuel ratio significantly greater than stoichiometry during the large majority of its operation.

 

10    Phase-In Requirements. For the purposes of this 1960.1(r) section only, each manufacturer’s PC and LDT fleet shall be defined as the total projected number of low-emission and ultra-low-emission PCs and LDTs from 0-5750 pounds loaded vehicle weight sold in California. Each manufacturer’s MDV fleet shall be defined as the total projected number of low-emission, ultra-low-emission, and super-ultra-low-emission MDVs less than 8501 pounds gross vehicle weight rating sold in California.

 

        a.     Manufacturers of PCs, LDTs, and MDVs, except small volume manufacturers, shall certify a minimum percentage of their PC and LDT fleet, and a minimum percentage of their MDV fleet, according to the following phase-in schedule.


 

Percentage

Model Year

PC, LDT

MDV

2001

25

NA

2002

50

NA

2003

85

25

2004

100

50

2005 and subsequent

100

100

 

        b.     Manufacturers may use an "Alternative or Equivalent Phase-in Schedule" to comply with the phase-in requirements. An "Alternative Phase-in" is one that achieves at least equivalent emission reductions by the end of the last model year of the scheduled phase-in. Model-year emission reductions shall be calculated by multiplying the percent of vehicles (based on the manufacturer’s projected California sales volume of the applicable vehicle fleet) meeting the new requirements per model year by the number of model years implemented prior to and including the last model year of the scheduled phase-in. The "cumulative total" is the summation of the model-year emission reductions (e.g., a four model-year 25/50/85/100 percent phase-in schedule would be calculated as: (25%*4 years) + (50%*3 years) + (85%*2 years) + (100%*1 year) = 520). Any alternative phase-in that results in an equal or larger cumulative total than the required cumulative total by the end of the last model year of the scheduled phase-in shall be considered acceptable by the Executive Officer under the following conditions: 1) all vehicles subject to the phase-in shall comply with the respective requirements in the last model year of the required phase-in schedule and 2) if a manufacturer uses the optional phase-in percentage determination in section 1960.1(q) note (9), the cumulative total of model-year emission reductions as determined only for PCs and LDTs certified to this section 1960.1(r) must also be equal to or larger than the required cumulative total by end of the 2004 model year. Manufacturers shall be allowed to include vehicles introduced before the first model year of the scheduled phase-in (e.g., in the previous example, 10 percent introduced one year before the scheduled phase-in begins would be calculated as: (10%*5 years) and added to the cumulative total).

        c.     Small volume manufacturers of PCs, LDTs, and MDVs shall certify 100% of their PC and LDT fleet in 2004 and subsequent model years, and 100% of their MDV fleet in 2005 and subsequent model years.

 

11    Single-Roll Electric Dynamometer Requirement. For all vehicles certified to the SFTP standards, a single-roll electric dynamometer or a dynamometer which produces equivalent results, as set forth in the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1988 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles" as incorporated by reference in section 1960.1(k), must be used for all types of emission testing to determine compliance with the associated emission standards.

 

NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 43018, 43101, 43104, and 43105, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39667, 43000, 43009.5, 43013, 43018, 43100, 43101, 43101.5, 43102, 43103, 43104, 43105, 43106, 43107, and 43204 - 43205.5, Health and Safety Code.


1960.5. Certification of 1983 and Subsequent Model-Year Federally Certified Light-Duty Motor Vehicles for Sale in California.


        (a)   The exhaust emissions from new 1983 and subsequent model year federally certified passenger cars and light-duty trucks, subject to registration and sold and registered in this state pursuant to section 43102(b) of the California Health and Safety Code, shall not exceed the applicable federal emission standards as determined under applicable federal test procedures.

        (b)   With respect to any new vehicle required to comply with the standards set forth in paragraph (a), the manufacturer’s written maintenance instructions for in-use vehicles shall not require scheduled maintenance more frequently than or beyond the scope of maintenance permitted under the test procedures referenced in paragraph (a). Any failure to perform scheduled maintenance shall not excuse an emissions violation unless the failure is related to or causes the violation.

         (c)   The standards and procedures for certifying in California 1983 through 2002 model-year federally-certified light-duty motor vehicles are set forth in "Guidelines for Certification of 1983 through 2002 Model-Year Federally Certified Light-Duty Motor Vehicles for Sale in California," adopted July 20, 1982, as last amended July 30, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference. The standards and procedures for certifying in California 2003 and subsequent model-year federally-certified light-duty motor vehicles are set forth in "Guidelines for Certification of 2003 and Subsequent Model-Year Federally Certified Light-Duty Motor Vehicles for Sale in California," adopted July 30, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.

 

NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 39601, 43100 and 43102, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 43102, Health and Safety Code.


1961. Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures - 2004 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles.


        Introduction. This section 1961 contains the California "LEV II" exhaust emission standards for 2004 and subsequent model passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles. A manufacturer must demonstrate compliance with the exhaust standards in section 1961(a) applicable to specific test groups, and with the composite phase-in requirements in section 1961(b) applicable to the manufacturer’s entire fleet. Section 1961(b) also includes the manufacturer’s fleet-wide composite phase-in requirements for the 2001 - 2003 model years.


        Prior to the 2004 model year, a manufacturer that produces vehicles that meet the standards in section 1961(a) has the option of certifying the vehicles to those standards, in which case the vehicles will be treated as LEV II vehicles for purposes of the fleet-wide phase-in requirements. Similarly, 2004 - 2006 model-year vehicles may be certified to the "LEV I" exhaust emission standards in section 1960.1(g)(1) and (h)(2), in which case the vehicles will be treated as LEV I vehicles for purposes of the fleet-wide phase-in requirements.


        A manufacturer has the option of certifying engines used in incomplete and diesel medium-duty vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of greater than 8,500 lbs. to the heavy-duty engine standards and test procedures set forth in title 13, CCR, sections 1956.8(c), (g) and (h).


        (a)   Exhaust Emission Standards.


        (1)   "LEV II" Exhaust Standards. The following standards represent the maximum exhaust emissions for the intermediate and full useful life from new 2004 and subsequent model-year "LEV II" LEVs, ULEVs, and SULEVs, including fuel-flexible, bi-fuel and dual fuel vehicles when operating on the gaseous or alcohol fuel they are designed to use:


LEV II Exhaust Mass Emission Standards for New 2004 and Subsequent Model

LEVs, ULEVs, and SULEVs

in the Passenger Car, Light-Duty Truck and Medium-Duty Vehicle Classes

Vehicle Type

Durability Vehicle Basis (mi)

Vehicle Emission Category

NMOG

(g/mi)

Carbon Monoxide

(g/mi)

Oxides of Nitrogen

(g/mi)

Formaldehyde

(mg/mi)

Particulates

(g/mi)

All PCs;

LDTs 8500 lbs. GVW or less


Vehicles in this category are tested at their loaded vehicle weight

50,000

LEV

0.075

3.4

0.05

15

n/a

LEV, Option 1

0.075

3.4

0.07

15

n/a

ULEV

0.04

1.7

0.05

8

n/a

120,000

LEV

0.09

4.2

0.07

18

0.01

LEV, Option 1

0.09

4.2

0.1

18

0.01

ULEV

0.055

2.1

0.07

11

0.01

SULEV

0.01

1

0.02

4

0.01

150,000 (Optional)

LEV

0.09

4.2

0.07

18

0.01

LEV, Option 1

0.09

4.2

0.1

18

0.01

ULEV

0.055

2.1

0.07

11

0.01

SULEV

0.01

1

0.02

4

0.01

MDVs

8501 - 10,000 lbs. GVW


Vehicles in this category are tested at their adjusted loaded vehicle weight

120,000

LEV

0.195

6.4

0.2

32

0.12

ULEV

0.143

6.4

0.2

16

0.06

SULEV

0.1

3.2

0.1

8

0.06

150,000

(Optional)

LEV

0.195

6.4

0.2

32

0.12

ULEV

0.143

6.4

0.2

16

0.06

SULEV

0.1

3.2

0.1

8

0.06

MDVs

10,001-14,000 lbs. GVW


Vehicles in this category are tested at their adjusted loaded vehicle weight

120,000

LEV

0.23

7.3

0.4

40

0.12

ULEV

0.167

7.3

0.4

21

0.06

SULEV

0.117

3.7

0.2

10

0.06

150,000

(Optional)

LEV

0.23

7.3

0.4

40

0.12

ULEV

0.167

7.3

0.4

21

0.06

SULEV

0.117

3.7

0.2

10

0.06


        (2)   Reactivity Adjustment in Determining Compliance with the NMOG Standard


                (A) The NMOG emission results from all TLEVs, LEVs, ULEVs and SULEVs certifying on a fuel other than conventional gasoline shall be numerically adjusted to establish an NMOG exhaust mass emission value equivalent. The manufacturer shall multiply measured NMOG exhaust emission results by the appropriate reactivity adjustment factor set forth in section 1961(a)(2)(B) or established in accordance with the test procedures incorporated by reference in section 1961(d). The reactivity adjustment factor represents the ratio of the NMOG specific reactivity of a low-emission vehicle designed to operate on a fuel other than conventional gasoline compared to the NMOG baseline specific reactivity of vehicles in the same vehicle emission category operated on conventional gasoline.

                (B) The following reactivity adjustment factors apply:


 

Light-Duty Vehicles

0-6000 lbs. GVW

Medium-Duty Vehicles

6001 lbs. - 14,000 lbs. GVW

TLEV

LEV

ULEV

LEV

ULEV

Fuel

Baseline Specific Reactivity (grams ozone / gram NMOG)

Conventional Gasoline

3.42

3.13

3.13

3.13

3.13

 

Reactivity Adjustment Factors

RFG

(through the 2003 model year)

0.98

0.94

0.94

0.94

0.94

M85

0.41

0.41

0.41

0.41

0.41

Natural Gas

1.0

0.43

0.43

0.43

0.43

LPG

1.0

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

 

Methane Reactivity Adjustment Factors

Natural Gas

0.0043

0.0047

0.0047

0.0047

0.0047


        (3)   NMOG Standards for Bi-Fuel, Fuel-Flexible and Dual-Fuel Vehicles Operating on Gasoline. For fuel-flexible, bi-fuel, and dual-fuel PCs, LDTs and MDVs, compliance with the NMOG exhaust mass emission standards shall be based on exhaust emission tests both when the vehicle is operated on the gaseous or alcohol fuel it is designed to use, and when the vehicle is operated on gasoline. A manufacturer must demonstrate compliance with the applicable exhaust mass emission standards for NMOG, CO, NOx and formaldehyde set forth in the table in section 1961(a)(1) when certifying the vehicle for operation on the gaseous or alcohol fuel.


        The following standards represent the maximum NMOG emissions when the vehicle is operating on gasoline. A manufacturer shall not apply a reactivity adjustment factor to the exhaust NMOG mass emission result when operating on gasoline. A manufacturer may measure NMHC in lieu of NMOG when fuel-flexible, bi-fuel and dual-fuel vehicles are operated on gasoline, in accordance with the test procedures incorporated by reference in section 1961(d). Testing at 50 F is not required for fuel-flexible, bi-fuel and dual-fuel vehicles when operating on gasoline. The applicable CO, NOx and formaldehyde standards are set forth in section 1961(a)(1).


LEV II NMOG Standards for Bi-Fuel, Fuel-Flexible and Dual-Fuel Vehicles

Operating on Gasoline

(g/mi)

Vehicle Type

Vehicle Emission

Category

Durability Vehicle Basis

50,000 mi

120,000 mi

All PCs;

LDTs, 0-8500 lbs. GVW

LEV

0.125

0.156

ULEV

0.075

0.090

SULEV

0.010

0.040

MDVs, 8501-10,000 lbs. GVW

LEV

n/a

0.230

ULEV

n/a

0.167

SULEV

n/a

0.117

MDVs, 10,001-14,000 lbs. GVW

LEV

n/a

0.280

ULEV

n/a

0.195

SULEV

n/a

0.143


        (4)   50̊F Exhaust Emission Standards. All light- and medium-duty LEVs, ULEVs and SULEVs must demonstrate compliance with the following exhaust emission standards for NMOG and formaldehyde (HCHO) measured on the FTP (40 CFR, Part 86, Subpart B) conducted at a nominal test temperature of 50̊ F, as modified by Part II, Section C of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Vehicles" incorporated by reference in section 1961(d). The NMOG mass emission result shall be multiplied by the applicable reactivity adjustment factor, if any, prior to comparing to the applicable adjusted 50,000 mile certification standards set forth below. A manufacturer may demonstrate compliance with the NMOG and HCHO certification standards contained in this subparagraph by measuring NMHC exhaust emissions or issuing a statement of compliance for HCHO in accordance with Section D.1, subparagraph (p) and Section G.3.1.2, respectively, of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Vehicles" incorporated by reference in section 1961(d). Emissions of CO and NOx measured at 50̊ F shall not exceed the standards set forth in §1961(a)(1) applicable to vehicles of the same emission category and vehicle type subject to a cold soak and emission test at 68̊ to 86̊ F. Natural gas and diesel-fueled vehicles are exempt from the 50̊ F test requirements.


Vehicle Weight Class

Vehicle Emission Category (g/mi)

LEV

ULEV

SULEV

NMOG

HCHO

NMOG

HCHO

NMOG

HCHO

PCs; LDTs 0-8500 lbs. GVW

0.150

0.030

0.080

0.016

0.020

0.008

MDVs 8501-10,000 lbs. GVW

0.390

0.064

0.286

0.032

0.200

0.016

MDVs 10,001-14,000 lbs. GVW

0.460

0.080

0.334

0.042

0.234

0.020


        (5)   Cold CO Standard. The following standards represent the 50,000 mile cold temperature exhaust carbon monoxide emission levels from new 2001 and subsequent model-year passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles:


2001 AND SUBSEQUENT MODEL-YEAR COLD TEMPERATURE

CARBON MONOXIDE EXHAUST EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR PASSENGER

CARS, LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS, AND MEDIUM-DUTY VEHICLES

(grams per mile)


Vehicle Type

Carbon Monoxide

All PCs, LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW;

                                                        10.0

LDTs, 3751 lbs. LVW - 8500 lbs. GVW;

LEV I and Tier 1 MDVs 8500 lbs. GVW and less

                                                        12.5


        These standards are applicable to vehicles tested at a nominal temperature of 20oF (-7oC) in accordance with 40 CFR Part 86 Subpart C, as amended by the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Vehicles" incorporated by reference in section 1961(d). Natural gas, diesel-fueled and zero-emission vehicles are exempt from these standards.


        (6)   Highway NOx Standard. The maximum emissions of oxides of nitrogen measured on the federal Highway Fuel Economy Test (HWFET; 40 CFR 600 Subpart B, which is incorporated herein by reference) shall not be greater than 1.33 times the applicable PC and LDT standards or 2.0 times the applicable MDV standards set forth in section 1961(a)(1). Both the projected emissions and the HWFET standard shall be rounded in accordance with ASTM E29-67 to the nearest 0.1 g/mi (or 0.01 g/mi for vehicles certified to the 0.05 or 0.02 g/mi NOx standards) before being compared.


        (7)   Supplemental Federal Test Procedure (SFTP) Off-Cycle Emission Standards. The SFTP exhaust emission levels from new 2004 and subsequent model LEVs, ULEVs, and SULEVs shall not exceed the standards set forth in section 1960.1(r).


        (8)   Requirements for Vehicles Certified to the Optional 150,000 Mile Standards.


        (A) Requirement to Generate Additional Fleet Average NMOG Credit. A vehicle that is certified to the 150,000 mile standards in section 1961(a) shall generate additional NMOG fleet average credit as set forth in 1961(b)(1) or additional vehicle equivalent credits as set forth in 1961(b)(2) provided that the manufacturer extends the warranty on high cost parts to 8 years or 100,000 miles, whichever occurs first, and agrees to extend the limit on high mileage in-use testing to 112,500 miles.


        (B) Requirement to Generate a Partial ZEV Allowance. A vehicle that is certified to the 150,000 mile SULEV standards shall also generate a partial ZEV allocation according to the criteria set forth in section C.3 of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2005 and Subsequent Model Zero-Emission Vehicles, and 2001 and Subsequent Model Hybrid Electric Vehicles, in the Passenger Car, Light-Duty Truck and Medium-Duty Vehicle Classes," incorporated by reference in section 1962.


        (9)   Optional LEV II NOx Standard. A manufacturer may certify up to 4% of its light-duty truck fleet from 3751 lbs. LVW - 8500 lbs. GVW with a maximum base payload of 2500 lbs. or more to the LEV, option 1, standard set forth in 1961(a)(1) based on projected sales of trucks in the LDT2 category. Passenger cars and light-duty trucks 0-3750 lbs. LVW are not eligible for this option.


        (10) Intermediate In-Use Compliance Standards. For test groups certified prior to the 2007 model year, the following intermediate in-use compliance standards shall apply for the first two model years the test group is certified to the new standard. For SULEVs certified prior to the 2004 model year, the following intermediate in-use compliance SULEV standards shall apply through the 2006 model year.


Emission Category

Durability Vehicle Basis

LEV II PCs and LDTs

LEV II MDVs

8500 - 10,000 lbs. GVW

NMOG

NOx

NOx

LEV/ULEV

50,000

n/a

0.07

n/a

120,000

n/a

0.10

0.3

150,000

n/a

0.10

0.3

LEV, Option 1

50,000

n/a

0.10

n/a

120,000

n/a

0.14

n/a

150,000

n/a

0.14

n/a

SULEV

120,000

0.020

0.03

0.15

150,000

0.020

0.03

0.15


        (11) NMOG Credit for Vehicles with Zero-Evaporative Emissions. In determining compliance of a vehicle with the applicable exhaust NMOG standard, a gram per mile NMOG factor, to be determined by the Executive Officer based on available data, shall be subtracted from the reactivity-adjusted NMOG exhaust emission results for any vehicle that has been certified to the "zero" evaporative emission standard set forth in title 13, CCR, section 1976(b)(1)(E). This credit shall not apply to a SULEV that generates a partial ZEV allowance.


        (12) NMOG Credit for Direct Ozone Reduction Technology. A manufacturer that certifies vehicles equipped with direct ozone reduction technologies shall be eligible to receive NMOG credits that can be applied to the NMOG exhaust emissions of the vehicle when determining compliance with the standard. In order to receive credit, the manufacturer must submit the following information for each vehicle model, including, but not limited to:

 

(A)  a demonstration of the airflow rate through the direct ozone reduction device and the ozone-reducing efficiency of the device over the range of speeds encountered in the Unified Cycle Driving Schedule;

 

(B)  an evaluation of the durability of the device for the full useful life of the vehicle; and

 

(C)  a description of the on-board diagnostic strategy for monitoring the performance of the device in-use.


Using the above information, the Executive Officer shall determine the value of the NMOG credit based on the calculated change in the one-hour peak ozone level using an approved airshed model.


        (13) NOx Credits for Pre-2004 MDVs Certified to the LEV I LEV or ULEV Standards. Prior to the 2004 model year, a manufacturer may earn a 0.02 g/mi per vehicle NOx credit for MDVs between 6,000-8500 lbs. GVW certified to the LEV I LEV or ULEV standards for PCs and LDTs set forth in section 1960.1(g)(1). The manufacturer may apply the credit on a per vehicle basis to the NOx emissions of LDTs between 6,000-8500 lbs. GVW certified to the PC/LDT LEV or ULEV standards in section 1961(a)(1) for the 2004 through 2008 model years.


        (14) When a Federally-Certified Vehicle Model is Required in California.

        (A)  General Requirement. Whenever a manufacturer federally-certifies a 2004 or subsequent model-year passenger car, light-duty truck or medium-duty vehicle model to the standards for a particular emissions bin that are more stringent than the standards for an applicable California emission category, the equivalent California model may only be certified to (i) the California standards for a vehicle emissions category that are at least as stringent as the standards for the corresponding federal emissions bin, or (ii) the exhaust emission standards to which the federal model is certified. However, where the federal exhaust emission standards for the particular emissions bin and the California standards for a vehicle emissions category are equally stringent, the California model may only be certified to either the California standards for that vehicle emissions category or more stringent California standards. The federal emission bins are those contained in Tables S04-1 and S04-2 of 40 CFR §86.1811-04(c) as adopted February 10, 2000. The criteria for applying this requirement are set forth in Part I. Section H.1 of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Vehicles," as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d).

        (B)  Exception for clean fuel fleet vehicles. Section 1961(a)(14)(A) does not apply in the case of a federally-certified vehicle model that is only marketed to fleet operators for applications that are subject to clean fuel fleet requirements established pursuant to section 246 of the federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. sec. 7586). In addition, the Executive Officer shall exclude from the requirement a federally-certified vehicle model where the manufacturer demonstrates to the Executive Officer’s reasonable satisfaction that the model will primarily be sold or leased to clean fuel fleet operators for such applications, and that other sales or leases of the model will be incidental to marketing to those clean fuel fleet operators.

        (C)  Opt-in for 2003 or prior model year vehicles. A manufacturer may certify a passenger car, light-duty truck or medium-duty vehicle to federal exhaust emission standards pursuant to section 1961(a)(14)(A) prior to the 2004 model year.


        (15) Emission Standard for a Fuel-Fired Heater. Whenever a manufacturer elects to utilize an on-board fuel-fired heater on any passenger car, light-duty truck or medium-duty vehicle, the fuel-fired heater must meet LEV II ULEV standards for passenger cars and light-duty trucks less than 8,500 pounds GVW as set forth in section 1961(a)(1). On-board fuel-fired heaters may not be operable at ambient temperatures above 40oF.

        (b)   Emission Standards Phase-In Requirements for Manufacturers.

        (1)   Fleet Average NMOG Requirements for Passenger Cars and Light-Duty Trucks.

                (A)  The fleet average non-methane organic gas exhaust mass emission values from the passenger cars and light-duty trucks certified to the Tier 1, LEV I and LEV II standards that are produced and delivered for sale in California each model year by a manufacturer other than a small volume manufacturer or an independent low volume manufacturer shall not exceed:


FLEET AVERAGE NON-METHANE ORGANIC GAS

EXHAUST MASS EMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR

LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLE WEIGHT CLASSES

(50,000 mile Durability Vehicle Basis)

Model Year


Fleet Average NMOG (grams per mile)

All PCs;

LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW

LDTs

 3751 lbs. LVW - 8500 lbs. GVW

2001

0.070

0.098

2002

0.068

0.095

2003

0.062

0.093

2004

0.053

0.085

2005

0.049

0.076

2006

0.046

0.062

2007

0.043

0.055

2008

0.040

0.050

2009

0.038

0.047

2010+

0.035

0.043


                (B)  Calculation of Fleet Average NMOG Value.

                        1.     Basic Calculation. 

                                a.     Each manufacturer’s PC and LDT1 fleet average NMOG value for the total number of PCs and LDT1s produced and delivered for sale in California shall be calculated as follows:

(∑ [Number of vehicles in a test group x applicable emission standard] +

[Number of hybrid electric vehicles in a test group x HEV NMOG factor]) ¸

Total Number of Vehicles Produced, Including ZEVs and HEVs


                                b.     Each manufacturer’s LDT2 fleet average NMOG value for the total number of LDT2s produced and delivered for sale in California shall be calculated as follows:

(∑ [Number of vehicles in a test group x applicable emission standard] +

∑ [Number of hybrid electric vehicles in a test group x HEV NMOG factor]) ¸

Total Number of Vehicles Produced, Including ZEVs and HEVs


                                c.     The applicable emission standards to be used in the above equations are as follows:


Model Year

Emission Category

Emission Standard Value

All PCs;

LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW

LDTs

3751-5750 lbs. LVW

2001 and subsequent (§1960.5 "AB 965" vehicles only)

All

Federal Emission Standard to which Vehicle is Certified

Federal Emission Standard to which Vehicle is Certified

2001 - 2003 (§1960.1(f)(2))

Tier 1

0.25

0.32

2001 - 2006 model year vehicles certified to the "LEV I" standards in §1960.1(g)(1) (For TLEVs, 2001 - 2003 model years only)

TLEVs

0.125

0.160

LEVs

0.075

0.100

ULEVs

0.040

0.050

Model Year

Emission Category

All PCs;

LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW

LDTs 3751 lbs. LVW - 8500 lbs. GVW

2004 and subsequent model year vehicles certified to the "LEV II" standards in §1961(a)(1)

LEVs

0.075

0.075

ULEVs

0.040

0.040

SULEVs

0.01

0.01

2004 and subsequent model year vehicles certified to the optional 150,000 mile "LEV II" standards for PCs and LDTs in 1961(a)(1)

LEVs

0.06

0.06

ULEVs

0.03

0.03

SULEVs

0.0085

0.0085


                        2.     HEV NMOG Factor. The HEV NMOG factor for light-duty vehicles is calculated as follows:

LEV HEV Contribution Factor = 0.075 - [(Zero-emission VMT Factor) x 0.035]

ULEV HEV Contribution Factor = 0.040 - [(Zero-emission VMT Factor) x 0.030]

where Zero-emission VMT Factor for HEVs is determined in accordance with section 1962.


                        3.     Federally-Certified Vehicles. A vehicle certified to the federal standards for a federal exhaust emissions bin in accordance with Section H.1 of the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles," as incorporated by reference in section 1961(d), shall use the corresponding intermediate useful life NMOG standard to which the vehicle is deemed certified in the fleet average calculation.


                (C)  Requirements for Small Volume Manufacturers.

                        1.     In 2001 through 2006 model years, a small volume manufacturer shall not exceed a fleet average NMOG value of 0.075 g/mi for PCs and LDTs from 0-3750 lbs. LVW or 0.100 g/mi for LDTs from 3751-5750 lbs. LVW calculated in accordance with section 1961(b)(1)(B). In 2007 and subsequent model years, a small volume manufacturer shall not exceed a fleet average NMOG value of 0.075 for PCs and LDTs from 0-3750 lbs. LVW or 0.075 for LDTs from 3751 lbs. LVW - 8500 lbs. GVW calculated in accordance with section 1961(b)(1)(B).

                        2.     If a manufacturer’s average California sales exceed 4500 units of new PCs, LDTs, MDVs and heavy duty engines based on the average number of vehicles sold for the three previous consecutive model years, the manufacturer shall no longer be treated as a small volume manufacturer and shall comply with the fleet average requirements applicable to larger manufacturers as specified in section 1961(b)(1) beginning with the fourth model year after the last of the three consecutive model years.

                        3.     If a manufacturer’s average California sales fall below 4500 units of new PCs, LDTs, MDVs and heavy duty engines based on the average number of vehicles sold for the three previous consecutive model years, the manufacturer shall be treated as a small volume manufacturer and shall be subject to the requirements for small volume manufacturers beginning with the next model year.


                (D)  Phase-in Requirements for Independent Low Volume Manufacturers. In 2001 through 2006 model years, an independent low volume manufacturer shall not exceed a fleet average NMOG value of 0.075 g/mi for PCs and LDTs from 0-3750 lbs. LVW or 0.100 g/mi for LDTs from 3751-5750 lbs. LVW calculated in accordance with section 1961(b)(1)(B). In 2007 and subsequent model years, an independent low volume manufacturer shall not exceed a fleet average NMOG value of 0.060 for PCs and LDTs from 0-3750 lbs. LVW or 0.065 g/mi for LDTs from 3751 lbs. LVW - 8500 lbs. GVW calculated in accordance with section 1961(b)(1)(B).


                (E)  Treatment of ZEVs. ZEVs classified as LDTs (>3750 lbs. LVW) that have been counted toward the ZEV requirement for PCs and LDTs (0-3750 lbs. LVW) as specified in section 1962 shall be included as LDT1s in the calculation of a fleet average NMOG value.

        (2)   LEV II Phase-In Requirement for PCs and LDTs. Beginning in the 2004 model year, a manufacturer, except a small volume manufacturer or an independent low volume manufacturer, shall certify a percentage of its PC and LDT fleet to the LEV II standards in section 1961(a) according to the following phase in schedule:


Model Year

PC/LDT1 (%)

LDT2 (%)

2004

25

25

2005

50

50

2006

75

75

2007

100

100


In determining compliance with the phase-in schedule, the fleet shall consist of LEV I and LEV II PCs and LDT1s for the PC/LDT1 calculation, and LEV I and LEV II LDT2s for the LDT2 calculation. LEV I MDVs are not counted in the calculation until they are certified as LEV II LDT2s. 


        A manufacturer may use an alternative phase-in schedule to comply with these phase-in requirements as long as equivalent NOx emission reductions are achieved by the 2007 model year from each of the two categories -- PC/LDT1 and LDT2. Model year emission reductions shall be calculated by multiplying the percent of either PC/LDT1 or LDT2 vehicles meeting the LEV II standards in a given model year (based on a manufacturer’s projected sales volume of vehicles in each category) by 4 for the 2004 model year, 3 for the 2005 model year, 2 for the 2006 model year and 1 for the 2007 model year. The yearly results for PCs/LDT1s shall be summed together to determine a separate cumulative total for PCs/LDT1s and the yearly results for LDT2s shall be summed together to determine a cumulative total for LDT2s. The cumulative total for each category must be equal to or exceed 500 to be considered equivalent. A manufacturer may add vehicles introduced before the 2004 model year (e.g., the percent of vehicles introduced in 2003 would be multiplied by 5) to the cumulative total.


        (3)   Medium-Duty Vehicle Phase-In Requirements.

        (A)  A manufacturer of MDVs, other than a small volume manufacturer, shall certify an equivalent percentage of its MDV fleet according to the following phase-in schedule:


Model Year


Vehicles Certified to §1960.1(h)(1), (h)(2), and §1961(a)(1) (%)

Vehicles Certified to §1956.8(g) or (h)

(%)

LEV

ULEV

Tier 1

LEV

ULEV

2001

80

20

100

0

0

2002

70

30

0

100

0

2003

60

40

0

100

0

2004 +

40

60

0

0

100


        (B)  Phase-In Requirements for LEV II MDVs. For the 2004 through 2006 model years, a manufacturer, other than a small volume manufacturer must phase-in at least one test group per model year to the MDV LEV II standards. All 2007 and subsequent model year MDVs, including those produced by a small volume manufacturer, are subject to the LEV II MDV standards. Beginning in the 2005 model year, all medium-duty engines certified to the optional medium-duty engine standards in title 13, CCR §1956.8(c) or (h), including those produced by a small volume manufacturer, must meet the standards set forth in title 13, CCR §1956.8(c) or (h), as applicable. A manufacturer that elects to certify to the Option 1 or Option 2 federal standards as set forth in 40 CFR §86.005-10(f) is not subject to these phase-in requirements.

        (C)  Identifying a Manufacturer's MDV Fleet. For the 2001 and subsequent model years, each manufacturer’s MDV fleet shall be defined as the total number of California-certified MDVs produced and delivered for sale in California. The percentages shall be applied to the manufacturers’ total production of California-certified medium-duty vehicles delivered for sale in California. For the 2005 and subsequent model years, a manufacturer that elects to certify to the optional medium-duty engine standards in title 13, CCR, §1956.8(c) or (h) shall not count those engines in the manufacturer’s total production of California-certified medium-duty vehicles for purposes of this subsection.

        (D)  Requirements for Small Volume Manufacturers. In 2001 through 2003 model years, a small volume manufacturer shall certify, produce, and deliver for sale in California vehicles or engines certified to the MDV Tier 1 standards in a quantity equivalent to 100% of its MDV fleet. In 2004 through 2006 model years, a small volume manufacturer shall certify, produce, and deliver for sale in California vehicles or engines certified to the MDV LEV I standards in a quantity equivalent to 100% of its MDV fleet. Engines certified to these MDV LEV I standards are not be eligible for emissions averaging.

        (E)  For a manufacturer that elects to certify to the optional medium-duty engine standards in title 13, CCR §1956.8(c) or (h), all such 2005 and subsequent model year MDVs, including those produced by a small volume manufacturer, shall be subject to the emissions averaging provisions applicable to heavy-duty diesel or Otto-cycle engines as set forth in the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Otto-Cycle Engines," or the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines, incorporated by reference in§1956.8(b) or (d), as applicable.

        (c)   Calculation of NMOG Credits/Debits

                (1)   Calculation of NMOG Credits for Passenger Cars and Light-Duty Trucks. In 2001 and subsequent model years, a manufacturer that achieves fleet average NMOG values lower than the fleet average NMOG requirement for the corresponding model year shall receive credits in units of g/mi NMOG determined as:


[(Fleet Average NMOG Requirement) - (Manufacturer’s Fleet Average NMOG Value)] x

(Total No. of Vehicles Produced and Delivered for Sale in California, Including ZEVs and HEVs).


A manufacturer with 2001 and subsequent model year fleet average NMOG values greater than the fleet average requirement for the corresponding model year shall receive debits in units of g/mi NMOG equal to the amount of negative credits determined by the aforementioned equation. For the 2001 and subsequent model years, the total g/mi NMOG credits or debits earned for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW, for LDTs 3751-5750 lbs. LVW and for LDTs 3751 lbs. LVW - 8500 lbs. GVW shall be summed together. The resulting amount shall constitute the g/mi NMOG credits or debits accrued by the manufacturer for the model year.


        (2)   Calculation of Vehicle Equivalent NMOG Credits for Medium-Duty Vehicles.

        (A)  In 2001 and subsequent model years, a manufacturer that produces and delivers for sale in California MDVs in excess of the equivalent requirements for LEVs, ULEVs and/or SULEVs certified to the exhaust emission standards set forth in section 1961(a)(1) or to the exhaust emission standards set forth in Title 13, CCR, Section 1956.8(h) shall receive "Vehicle-Equivalent Credits" (or "VECs") calculated in accordance with the following equation, where the term "produced" means produced and delivered for sale in California:

{[(L No. of LEVs Produced excluding HEVs) +

(L No. of LEV HEVs x HEV VEC factor for LEVs)] +

(1.20 x L No. of LEVs certified to the 150,000 mile standards)} -

(Equivalent L No. of LEVs Required to be Produced)} +


{[(1.4) x (L No. of ULEVs Produced excluding HEVs) +

(L No. of ULEV HEVs x HEV VEC factor for ULEVs)] +

(1.50 x L No. of ULEVs certified to the 150,000 mile standards)} -

[(1.4) x (Equivalent L No. of ULEVs Required to be Produced)]} +


{[(1.7) x (L No. of SULEVs Produced excluding HEVs) +

(L No. of SULEV HEVs x HEV VEC factor for SULEVs)] +

(1.75 x L No. of SULEVs certified to the 150,000 mile standards)} -

[(1.7) x [(Equivalent L No. of SULEVs Required to be Produced)]} +


[(2.0) x (L No. of ZEVs Certified and Produced as MDVs)].


        MDVs certified prior to the 2004 model year to the LEV I LEV or ULEV standards for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW set forth in section E.1 of these test procedures shall receive VECs calculated in accordance with the following equation, where the term "produced" means produced and delivered for sale in California:

 

[(1.6) x (L No. of MDVs meeting the LEV I LEV standards for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW excluding HEVs) +

(L No. of HEVs meeting the LEV I LEV standards for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW x HEV VEC factor for MDVs meeting the LEV I LEV standards for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW)]+

[(1.65 x L No. of MDVs certified to the 150,000 mile LEV I LEV standards for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. )] +

 

[(1.8) x (L No. of MDVs meeting the LEV I ULEV standards for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW excluding HEVs) +

(L No. of HEVs meeting the LEV I ULEV standards for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW x HEV VEC factor for MDVs meeting the LEV I ULEV standards for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW)]+

[(1.85 x L No. of MDVs certified to the 150,000 mile LEV I ULEV standards for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs.)].


        (B)  MDV HEV VEC factor. The MDV HEV VEC factor is calculated as follows:


1 + [(LEV standard - ULEV standard) x (Zero-emission VMT Factor) ÷ LEV standard] for LEVs;

1 + [(ULEV standard - SULEV standard) x (Zero-emission VMT Factor) ÷ ULEV standard] for ULEVs;

1 + [(SULEV standard - ZEV standard) x (Zero-emission VMT Factor) ÷ SULEV standard] for SULEVs;

where "Zero-emission VMT Factor" for an HEV is determined in accordance with section 1962.


        The HEV VEC factor for MDVs prior to model year 2004 meeting the LEV I LEV and ULEV standards for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW is calculated as follows:

 

1 + [(MDV SULEV standard - PC LEV I LEV standard) x (Zero-emission VMT Factor) ÷PC LEV I LEV standard] for MDVs meeting the LEV I LEV standards for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW;

1 + [(MDV SULEV standard - PC ULEV standard) x (Zero-emission VMT Factor) ÷PC LEV I ULEV standard] for MDVs meeting the ULEV I LEV standards for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW.


        (C)  A manufacturer that fails to produce and deliver for sale in California the equivalent quantity of MDVs certified to LEV, ULEV and/or SULEV exhaust emission standards, shall receive "Vehicle-Equivalent Debits" (or "VEDs") equal to the amount of negative VECs determined by the equation in section 1961(c)(2)(A).

        (D)  Only ZEVs certified as MDVs and not used to meet the ZEV requirement shall be included in the calculation of VECs.

        (3)   Procedure for Offsetting Debits.


        (A)  A manufacturer shall equalize emission debits by earning g/mi NMOG emission credits or VECs in an amount equal to the g/mi NMOG debits or VEDs, or by submitting a commensurate amount of g/mi NMOG credits or VECs to the Executive Officer that were earned previously or acquired from another manufacturer. For 2001 through 2003 and for 2007 and subsequent model years, manufacturers shall equalize emission debits by the end of the following model year. For 2004 through 2006 model years, a manufacturer shall equalize NMOG debits for PCs and LDTs and LEV II MDVs within three model years and prior to the end of the 2007 model year. If emission debits are not equalized within the specified time period, the manufacturer shall be subject to the Health and Safety Code section 43211 civil penalty applicable to a manufacturer which sells a new motor vehicle that does not meet the applicable emission standards adopted by the state board. The cause of action shall be deemed to accrue when the emission debits are not equalized by the end of the specified time period. For the purposes of Health and Safety Code section 43211, the number of passenger cars and light-duty trucks not meeting the state board’s emission standards shall be determined by dividing the total amount of g/mi NMOG emission debits for the model year by the g/mi NMOG fleet average requirement for PCs and LDTs 0-3750 lbs. LVW applicable for the model year in which the debits were first incurred and the number of medium-duty vehicles not meeting the state board’s emission standards shall be equal to the amount of VEDs incurred.


        (B)  The emission credits earned in any given model year shall retain full value through the subsequent model year. The value of any credits not used to equalize the previous model-year’s debit shall be discounted by 50% at the beginning of second model year after being earned, shall be discounted to 25% of its original value if not used by the beginning of the third model year after being earned, and will have no value if not used by the beginning of the fourth model year after being earned.


        (d)   Test Procedures. The certification requirements and test procedures for determining compliance with the emission standards in this section are set forth in the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles," as amended May 28, 2004, and the "California Non-Methane Organic Gas Test Procedures," as amended July 30, 2002, which are incorporated herein by reference. In the case of hybrid electric vehicles and on-board fuel-fired heaters, the certification requirements and test procedures for determining compliance with the emission standards in this section are set forth in the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2005 and Subsequent Model Zero-Emission Vehicles, and 2001 and Subsequent Model Hybrid Electric Vehicles, in the Passenger Car, Light-Duty Truck and Medium-Duty Vehicle Classes," incorporated by reference in section 1962.


        (e)   Abbreviations. The following abbreviations are used in this section 1961:


        "ALVW" means adjusted loaded vehicle weight.

        "ASTM" means American Society of Testing and Materials.

        "CO" means carbon monoxide.

        "FTP" means Federal Test Procedure.

        "g/mi" means grams per mile.

        "GVW" means gross vehicle weight.

        "GVWR" means gross vehicle weight rating.

        "HEV" means hybrid-electric vehicle.

        "LDT" means light-duty truck.

        "LDT1" means a light-duty truck with a loaded vehicle weight of 0-3750 pounds.

"LDT2" means a "LEV II" light-duty truck with a loaded vehicle weight of 3751 pounds to a gross vehicle weight of 8500 pounds or a "LEV I" light-duty truck with a loaded vehicle weight of 3751-5750 pounds.

        "LEV" means low-emission vehicle.

        "LPG" means liquefied petroleum gas.

        "LVW" means loaded vehicle weight.

        "MDV" means medium-duty vehicle.

        "NMHC" means non-methane hydrocarbons.

        "mg/mi" means milligrams per mile.

        "NMHC" means non-methane hydrocarbons.

"Non-Methane Organic Gases" or "NMOG" means the total mass of oxygenated and non-oxygenated hydrocarbon emissions.

        "NOx" means oxides of nitrogen.

"PC" means passenger car.

        "SULEV" means super-ultra-low-emission vehicle.

"TLEV" means transitional low-emission vehicle.

        "ULEV" means ultra-low-emission vehicle.

        "VEC" means vehicle-equivalent credits.

        "VED" means vehicle-equivalent debits.

        "VMT" means vehicle miles traveled.

        "ZEV" means zero-emission vehicle.

 

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 43018, 43101, 43104 and 43105, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39667, 43000, 43009.5, 43013, 43018, 43100, 43101, 43101.5, 43102, 43104, 43105, 43106, 43107, 43204, and 43205.5, Health and Safety Code.


§1962. Zero-Emission Vehicle Standards for 2005 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles.


        (a)   ZEV Emission Standard. The Executive Officer shall certify new 2005 and subsequent model passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles as ZEVs if the vehicles produce zero exhaust emissions of any criteria pollutant (or precursor pollutant) under any and all possible operational modes and conditions. Incorporation of a fuel-fired heater shall not preclude a vehicle from being certified as a ZEV provided: (1) the fuel-fired heater cannot be operated at ambient temperatures above 40oF, (2) the heater is demonstrated to have zero fuel evaporative emissions under any and all possible operational modes and conditions, and (3) the emissions of any pollutant from the fuel-fired heater when operated at an ambient temperature between 68oF and 86oF do not exceed the emission standard for that pollutant for a ULEV under section 1961(a)(1).


        A vehicle that would meet the emissions standards for a ZEV except that it uses a fuel-fired heater that can be operated at ambient temperatures above 40oF, that cannot be demonstrated to have zero fuel evaporative emissions under any and all possible operation modes and conditions, or that has emissions of any pollutant exceeding the emission standard for that pollutant for a ULEV under section 1961(a)(1), shall be certified based on the emission level of the fuel-fired heater.


        (b)   Percentage ZEV Requirements.

                (1)   General Percentage ZEV Requirement.

                        (A) Basic Requirement. The minimum percentage ZEV requirement for each manufacturer is listed in the table below as the percentage of the PCs and LDT1s, and LDT2s to the extent required by section (b)(1)(C), produced by the manufacturer and delivered for sale in California that must be ZEVs, subject to the conditions in this section 1962(b).


Model Years


Minimum ZEV Requirement


2005 through 2008

10 percent

2009 through 2011

11 percent

2012 through 2014

12 percent

2015 through 2017

14 percent

2018 and subsequent

16 percent


                        (B) Calculating the Number of Vehicles to Which the Percentage ZEV Requirement is Applied. A manufacturer’s volume of PCs and LDT1s produced and delivered for sale in California will be averaged for the 1997, 1998, and 1999 model years to determine the California PC and LDT1 production volume for the model year 2005 ZEV requirements. For subsequent three-year periods following model year 2005, a manufacturer’s California production volume of PCs and LDT1s, and LDT2s as applicable, will be based on a three-year average of the manufacturer’s volume of PCs and LDT1s, and LDT2s as applicable, produced and delivered for sale in California in the prior fourth, fifth and sixth years (e.g. 2006 to 2008 model-year ZEV requirements will be based on California production volumes of PCs and LDT1s, and LDT2s as applicable, for 2000 to 2002 model years). This production averaging is used to determine ZEV requirements only, and has no effect on a manufacturer’s size determination. As an alternative to the three year averaging of prior year production described above, a manufacturer may during model year 2005 or the first model year of a subsequent three year period elect to base its ZEV obligation on the number of PCs and LDT1s, and LDT2s to the extent required by section (b)(1)(C), produced by the manufacturer and delivered for sale in California that same year. If a manufacturer elects to use this method after model year 2005 it must be used for each year of the three-year period. In applying the ZEV requirement, a PC, LDT1, or LDT2 (beginning in the 2007 model year) that is produced by a small volume manufacturer, but is marketed in California by another manufacturer under the other manufacturer’s nameplate, shall be treated as having been produced by the marketing manufacturer.


                (C)  Phase-in of ZEV Requirements for LDT2s. Beginning with the ZEV requirements for the 2007 model year, a manufacturer’s LDT2 production shall be included in determining the manufacturer’s overall ZEV requirement under section (b)(1)(A) in the increasing percentages shown the table below.


2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012+

17%

34%

51%

68%

85%

100%


                (D)  Exclusion of ZEVs in Determining a Manufacturer’s Sales Volume. In calculating for purposes of sections 1962(b)(1)(B) and 1962(b)(1)(C) the volume of PCs, LDT1s and LDT2s a manufacturer has produced and delivered for sale in California, the manufacturer shall exclude the number of ZEVs produced by the manufacturer, or by a subsidiary in which the manufacturer has a greater than 50% ownership interest, and delivered for sale in California.

                (2)   Requirements for Large Volume Manufacturers.

                        (A)  Primary Requirements for Large Volume Manufacturers. In the 2005 through 2008 model years, a large-volume manufacturer must meet at least 20% of its ZEV requirement with ZEVs or ZEV credits generated by such vehicles, and at least another 20% with ZEVs, advanced technology PZEVs, or credits generated by such vehicles. The remainder of the large-volume manufacturer’s ZEV requirement may be met using PZEVs or credits generated by such vehicles. As the ZEV requirement increases over time from 10% in model year 2005 to 16% in model years 2018 and subsequent, the maximum portion of a large volume manufacturer’s percentage ZEV requirement that may be satisfied by PZEVs that are not advanced technology PZEVs, or credits generated by such vehicles, is limited to 6% of the manufacturer’s applicable California PC, LDT1, and LDT2 production volume; advanced technology PZEVs or credits generated by such vehicles may be used to meet up to one-half of the manufacturer’s remaining ZEV requirement.

                        (B)  Alternative Requirements for Large Volume Manufacturers.

                                1.     Minimum Floor for Production of Type III ZEVs.

                                        a.     Requirement For the 2005-2008 Model Years. A large volume manufacturer electing to be subject to the alternative compliance requirements during model years 2005 through 2008 must produce, deliver for sale, and place in service in California enough 2001-2008 model-year Type III ZEVs to generate ZEV credits sufficient to meet a cumulative percentage ZEV requirement of 1.09 percent of the manufacturer’s average annual California sales of PCs and LDT1s over the five year period from model years 1997 through 2001, or submit an equivalent number of credits generated by such vehicles. The manufacturer may meet up to one half of this requirement with [i] 2004-2008 model-year Type I or Type II ZEVs, provided that 20 Type I ZEVs or 10 Type II ZEVs will equal one Type III ZEV, and [ii] 1997-2003 model-year Type I or Type II ZEVs that qualify for an extended service multiplier under section 1962(f) for a year primarily during calendar years 2004-2008, provided that 33 years of such a multiplier will equal one Type III ZEV.

                                        b.     Requirement For the 2009-2011 Model Years. A large volume manufacturer electing to be subject to the alternative compliance requirements during model years 2009 through 2011 must produce, deliver for sale, and place in service in California enough 2009-2011 model-year Type III ZEVs to generate ZEV credits sufficient to meet the 2009-2011 alternative path percentage, as calculated pursuant to section 1962(b)(2)(B)1.e., of the manufacturer's section 1962(b)(1) percentage ZEV requirement for the 2010 model year, based on the prior year method described in section 1962(b)(1)(B), or submit an equivalent number of credits generated by such vehicles. The manufacturer may meet up to one half of this requirement with [i] 2009-2011 model-year Type I or Type II ZEVs, provided that 20 Type I ZEVs or 10 Type II ZEVs will equal one Type III ZEV, and [ii] 1997-2003 model-year ZEVs that qualify for an extended service multiplier under section 1962(f) for a year primarily during calendar years 2009-2011, provided that 33 years of such a multiplier will equal one Type III ZEV.

                                        c.     Requirement For the 2012-2014 Model Years. A large volume manufacturer electing to be subject to the alternative compliance requirements during model years 2012 through 2014 must produce, deliver for sale, and place in service in California enough 2012-2014 model-year Type III ZEVs to generate ZEV credits sufficient to meet the 2012-2014 alternative path percentage, as calculated pursuant to section 1962(b)(2)(B)1.e., of the manufacturer's section 1962(b)(1) percentage ZEV requirement for the 2013 model year, based on the prior year method described in section 1962(b)(1)(B), or submit an equivalent number of credits generated by such vehicles. The manufacturer may meet up to one half of this requirement with 2012-2014 model-year Type I or Type II ZEVs, provided that 10 Type I ZEVs or 5 Type II ZEVs will equal one Type III ZEV.

                                        d.     Requirement For the 2015-2017 Model Years. A large volume manufacturer electing to be subject to the alternative compliance requirements during model years 2015 through 2017 must produce, deliver for sale, and place in service in California enough 2015-2017 model-year Type III ZEVs to generate ZEV credits sufficient to meet the 2015-2017 alternative path percentage, as calculated in section 1962(b)(2)(B)1.e., of the manufacturer's section 1962(b)(1) percentage ZEV requirement for the 2016 model year, based on the prior year method described in section 1962(b)(1)(B), or submit an equivalent number of credits generated by such vehicles. The manufacturer may meet up to one half of this requirement with 2015-2017 model-year Type I or Type II ZEVs, provided that 10 Type I ZEVs or 5 Type II ZEVs will equal one Type III ZEV.

                                        e.     Calculation of a Manufacturer’s Alternative Path Percentage. A manufacturer’s alternative path percentage for a given time period is calculated as the target number of credits for each time period divided by the applicable combined model year ZEV obligation of all large volume manufacturers for that same time period, where:


Time Period

(MYs)

Target Number of Alternative Path Type III ZEVs

Credits per Vehicle

Target Number of Credits

Combined Model Year ZEV Obligation

Alternative Path Percentage

2009 – 2011

2500

4

10000

A

(10,000/A)x100

2012 – 2014

25000

3

75000

B

(75,000/B)x100

2015 – 2017

50000

3

150000

C

(150,000/C)x100


And where:

 

A = The combined total section 1962(b)(1) percentage ZEV requirement, based on the prior year method described in section 1962(b)(1)(B), that would apply for all large manufacturers for the 2010 model year,

B =  The combined total section 1962(b)(1) percentage ZEV requirement, based on the prior year method described in section 1962(b)(1)(B), that would apply for all large manufacturers for the 2013 model year, and

C =  The combined total section 1962(b)(1) percentage ZEV requirement, based on the prior year method described in section 1962(b)(1)(B), that would apply for all large manufacturers for the 2016 model year.


                                        f.     Exclusion of Additional Credits for Transportation Systems. Any additional credits for transportation systems generated in accordance with section 1962(g)(5) shall not be counted towards compliance with this section 1962(b)(2)(B)1.a.-d.


                                        g.     Carry-over of Excess Credits. Where a manufacturer generates more qualifying ZEV credits than are needed to meet the minimum floor requirement for the production of Type III ZEVs in one of the periods identified in section 1962(b)(2)(B)1.a.-c., the qualifying ZEV credits may be used towards meeting the minimum floor requirement for the production of Type III ZEVs in a subsequent period, provided that the value of these carryover credits shall be based on the model year in which the credits are used.

                                        h.     Failure to Meet Requirement for Production of Type III ZEVs. A manufacturer that, after electing to be subject to the alternative requirements in section 1962(b)(2)(B) for any model year from 2005 through 2017, fails to meet the requirement in section 1962(b)(2)(B)1.a..-d. by the end of the specified three or four year period in which the model year falls, shall be treated as subject to the primary requirements in section 1962(b)(2)(A) for all model years in the specified three or four year period.

                                        i.     The number of Type III ZEVs needed for a manufacturer under section 1962(b)(2)(B)1.a.-d shall be rounded to the nearest whole number.

                        2.     Compliance With Percentage ZEV Requirements. In the 2005 through 2008 model years, a large volume manufacturer electing to be subject to the alternative compliance requirements in a given model year must meet at least 40 percent of its ZEV requirement for that model year with ZEVs, advanced technology PZEVs, or credits generated from such vehicles. The remainder of the large volume manufacturer’s ZEV requirement may be met using PZEVs or credits generated from such vehicles. As the ZEV requirement increases over time from 11% in model year 2009 to 16% in model years 2018 and subsequent, the maximum portion of the large volume manufacturer’s percentage ZEV requirement that may be satisfied by PZEVs that are not advanced technology PZEVs, or credits generated by such vehicles, is limited to 6% of the manufacturer’s applicable California PC, LDT1, and LDT2 production volume; ZEVs, AT PZEVs, or credits generated by such vehicles may be used to meet the manufacturer’s remaining ZEV requirement.

                        3.     Sunset of Alternative Requirements After the 2017 Model Year. The alternative requirements in section 1962(b)(2)(B) are not available after the 2017 model year.


                (C)  Election of the Primary or Alternative Requirements for Large Volume Manufacturers. A large volume manufacturer shall be subject to the primary ZEV requirements for the 2005 model year unless it notifies the Executive Officer in writing prior to the start of the 2005 model year that it is electing to be subject to the alternative compliance requirements for that model year. Thereafter, a manufacturer shall be subject to the same compliance option as applied in the previous model year unless it notifies the Executive Officer in writing prior to the start of a new model year that it is electing to switch to the other compliance option for that new model year. However, a large volume manufacturer that has previously elected to be subject to the primary ZEV requirements for one or more of the model years in the three or four year periods identified in section 1961(b)(1(B)1.a.-d. may prior to the end of the three or four year period elect to become subject to the alternative compliance requirements for the full three or four year period upon a demonstration that it has complied with all of the applicable requirements for that period in section 1962(b)(2)(B)1.a.-d.


                (D)  Use of Credits from Model Year 2003-2004 PZEVs. A large volume manufacturer may produce, and deliver for sale in California, model year 2003 or 2004 PZEVs that generate credits exceeding the number of credits equal to 6 percent of the average annual volume of 1997, 1998 and 1999 PCs and LDT1s produced and delivered for sale in California by the manufacturer. In that event, the manufacturer may use those excess credits as AT PZEV credits in the 2005 and 2006 model years.


        (3)   Requirements for Intermediate Volume Manufacturers. In the 2005 and subsequent model years, an intermediate volume manufacturer may meet its ZEV requirement with up to 100 percent PZEVs or credits generated by such vehicles.


        (4)   Requirements for Small Volume Manufacturers and Independent Low Volume Manufacturers. A small volume manufacturer or an independent low volume manufacturer is not required to meet the percentage ZEV requirements. However, a small volume manufacturer or an independent low volume manufacturer may earn and market credits for the ZEVs or PZEVs it produces and delivers for sale in California.


        (5)   Counting ZEVs and PZEVs in Fleet Average NMOG Calculations. For the purposes of calculating a manufacturer’s fleet average NMOG value and NMOG credits under sections 1960.1(g)(2) and 1961(b) and (c), a vehicle certified as a ZEV is counted as one ZEV, and a PZEV is counted as one SULEV certified to the 150,000 mile standards regardless of any ZEV or PZEV multipliers.


        (6)   Implementation Prior to 2005 Model Year. Prior to the 2005 model year, a manufacturer that voluntarily produces vehicles meeting the ZEV emission standards applicable to 2005 and subsequent model year vehicles may certify the vehicles to those standards and requirements for purposes of calculating fleet average NMOG exhaust emission values and NMOG credits under sections 1960.1(g)(2) and 1961(b) and (c), and for calculating ZEV credits as set forth in section 1962(d).


        (7)   Changes in Small Volume, Independent Low Volume, and Intermediate Volume Manufacturer Status.


        (A)  Increases in California Production Volume. In the 2003 and subsequent model years, if a small volume manufacturer’s average California production volume exceeds 4,500 units of new PCs, LDTs, and MDVs based on the average number of vehicles produced and delivered for sale for the three previous consecutive model years, or if an independent low volume manufacturer’s average California production volume exceeds 10,000 units of new PCs, LDTs, and MDVs based on the average number of vehicles produced and delivered for sale for the three previous consecutive model years, or if an intermediate volume manufacturer’s average California production volume exceeds 60,000 units of new PCs, LDTs, and MDVs based on the average number of vehicles produced and delivered for sale for the three previous consecutive model years, the manufacturer shall no longer be treated as a small volume, independent low volume, or intermediate volume manufacturer, as applicable, and shall comply with the ZEV requirements for independent low volume, intermediate volume or large volume manufacturers, as applicable, beginning with the sixth model year after the last of the three consecutive model years. The lead time shall be four rather than six years where a manufacturer ceases to be a small or intermediate volume manufacturer in the 2003 or subsequent years due to the aggregation requirements in majority ownership situations, except that if the majority ownership in the manufacturer was acquired prior to the 2001 model year, the manufacturer must comply with the stepped-up ZEV requirements starting in the 2010 model year.


        (B)  Decreases in California Production Volume. If a manufacturer’s average California production volume falls below 4,500, 10,000 or 60,000 units of new PCs, LDTs, and MDVs, as applicable, based on the average number of vehicles produced and delivered for sale for the three previous consecutive model years, the manufacturer shall be treated as a small volume, independent low volume, or intermediate volume manufacturer, as applicable, and shall be subject to the requirements for a small volume, independent low volume, or intermediate volume manufacturer beginning with the next model year.


Tier

Model Year in Which ZEV is Placed in Service

 

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012+

NEV

1.25

0.625

0.625

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.15

Type 0 (Utility)

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

1

1

1

1

Type 1 (City)

8

8

8

7

7

7

2

2

2

2

Type II

12

12

12

10

10

10

3

3

3

3

Type III

40

40

40

40

40

40

4

4

4

3


                (C)  Multiplier for Certain Type I and Type II ZEVs. A 2004 through 2011 model-year Type I and Type II ZEV shall qualify for a multiplier of 1.25 if it is either sold to a motorist or is leased for three or more years to a motorist who is given the option to purchase or re-lease the vehicle for two years or more at the end of the first lease term.


                (D)  Counting a Type III ZEV Placed in a Section 177 State. Through the 2011 model year, a Type III ZEV that is certified to the California ZEV standards and is placed in service in a state that is administering the California ZEV requirements pursuant to section 177 of the federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7507) applicable for the ZEV’s model year may be counted towards compliance with the California percentage ZEV requirements in section 1962(b), including the requirements in section 1962(b)(2)(B), as if it were delivered for sale and placed in service in California. Similarly, a 2011 and earlier model-year Type III ZEV that is certified to the California ZEV standards and is placed in service in California may be counted towards the percentage ZEV requirements of any state that is administering the California ZEV requirements pursuant to section 177 of the federal Clean Air Act, including requirements based on section 1962(b)(2)(B).


        (e)   [Reserved]


        (f)    Extended Service Multiplier for 1997-2003 Model-Year ZEVs and PZEVs With ³ 10 Mile Zero Emission Range. Except in the case of a NEV, an additional ZEV or PZEV multiplier will be earned by the manufacturer of a 1997 through 2003 model-year ZEV, or PZEV with ³ 10 mile zero emission range, for each full year it is registered for operation on public roads in California beyond its first three years of service, through the 2011 calendar year. For additional years of service starting earlier than April 24, 2003, the manufacturer will receive 0.1 times the ZEV credit that would be earned by the vehicle if it were leased or sold new in that year, including multipliers, on a year-by-year basis beginning in the fourth year after the vehicle is initially placed in service. For additional years of service starting April 24, 2003 or later, the manufacturer will receive 0.2 times the ZEV credit that would be earned by the vehicle if it were leased or sold new in that year, including multipliers, on a year-by-year basis beginning in the fourth year after the vehicle is initially placed in service. The extended service multiplier is reported and earned in the year following each continuous year of service.


        (g)   Generation and Use of ZEV Credits; Calculation of Penalties


(1)   Introduction. A manufacturer that produces and delivers for sale in California ZEVs or PZEVs in a given model year exceeding the manufacturer’s ZEV requirement set forth in section 1962(b) shall earn ZEV credits in accordance with this section 1962(g).


(2)   ZEV Credit Calculations.


        (A)  Credits from ZEVs. The amount of g/mi ZEV credits earned by a manufacturer in a given model year from ZEVs shall be expressed in units of g/mi NMOG, and shall be equal to the number of credits from ZEVs produced and delivered for sale in California that the manufacturer applies towards meeting the ZEV requirements for the model year subtracted from the number of ZEVs produced and delivered for sale in California by the manufacturer in the model year and then multiplied by the NMOG fleet average requirement for PCs and LDT1s for that model year.


        (B)  Credits from PZEVs. The amount of g/mi ZEV credits from PZEVs earned by a manufacturer in a given model year shall be expressed in units of g/mi NMOG, and shall be equal to the total number of PZEVs produced and delivered for sale in California that the manufacturer applies towards meeting its ZEV requirement for the model year subtracted from the total number of PZEV allowances from PZEVs produced and delivered for sale in California by the manufacturer in the model year and then multiplied by the NMOG fleet average requirement for PCs and LDT1s for that model year.


        (C)  Separate Credit Accounts. The number of credits from a manufacturer’s [i] ZEVs, [ii] advanced technology PZEVs, and [iii] all other PZEVs shall each be maintained separately.


                (3)   ZEV Credits for MDVs and LDTs Other Than LDT1s. ZEVs and PZEVs classified as MDVs or as LDTs other than LDT1s may be counted toward the ZEV requirement for PCs and LDT1s, and included in the calculation of ZEV credits as specified in this section 1962(g) if the manufacturer so designates.


                (4)   ZEV Credits for Advanced Technology Demonstration Programs. A vehicle, other than a NEV, that is placed in a California advanced technology demonstration program may earn ZEV credits even if it is not "delivered for sale." To earn such credits, the manufacturer must demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of the Executive Officer that the vehicles will be regularly used in applications appropriate to evaluate issues related to safety, infrastructure, fuel specifications or public education, and that for more than 50 percent of the first year of placement the vehicle will be situated in California. Such a vehicle is eligible to receive the same allowances and credits that it would have earned if placed in service. To determine vehicle credit, the model-year designation for a demonstration vehicle shall be consistent with the model-year designation for conventional vehicles placed in the same timeframe.


                (5)   ZEV Credits for Transportation Systems.


                        (A)  General. In model years 2001 through 2011, a ZEV, advanced technology PZEV or PZEV placed as part of a transportation system may earn additional ZEV credits, which may used in the same manner as other credits earned by vehicles of that category, except as provided in section (g)(5)(C) below. A NEV is not eligible to earn credit for transportation systems. To earn such credits, the manufacturer must demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of the Executive Officer that the vehicle will be used as a part of a project that uses an innovative transportation system as described in section (g)(5)(B) below.


                        (B)  Credits Earned. In order to earn additional credit under this section (g)(5), a project must at a minimum demonstrate [i] shared use of ZEVs, AT PZEVs or PZEVs, and [ii] the application of "intelligent" new technologies such as reservation management, card systems, depot management, location management, charge billing and real-time wireless information systems. If, in addition to factors [i] and [ii] above, a project also features linkage to transit, the project may receive further additional credit. For ZEVs only, not including NEVs, a project that features linkage to transit, such as dedicated parking and charging facilities at transit stations, but does not demonstrate shared use or the application of intelligent new technologies, may also receive additional credit for linkage to transit. The maximum credit awarded per vehicle shall be determined by the Executive Officer, based upon an application submitted by the manufacturer and, if appropriate, the project manager. The maximum credit awarded shall not exceed the following:


Type of Vehicle

Shared Use, Intelligence

Linkage to Transit

PZEV

2

1

Advanced Technology PZEV

4

2

ZEV

6

3


                        (C)  Cap on Use of Credits.

                        1.     ZEVs. Credits earned or allocated by ZEVs pursuant to this section (g)(5), not including all credits earned by the vehicle itself, may be used to satisfy up to one-tenth of a manufacturer’s ZEV obligation in any given model year.

                        2.     AT PZEVs. Credits earned or allocated by AT PZEVs pursuant to this section (g)(5), not including all credits earned by the vehicle itself, may be used to satisfy up to one-twentieth of a manufacturer’s ZEV obligation in any given model year, but may only be used in the same manner as other credits earned by vehicles of that category.

                        3.     PZEVs. Credits earned or allocated by PZEVs pursuant to this section (g)(5), not including all credits earned by the vehicle itself, may be used to satisfy up to one-fiftieth of the manufacturer’s ZEV obligation in any given model year, but may only be used in the same manner as other credits earned by vehicles of that category.

                        (D)  Allocation of Credits. Credits shall be assigned by the Executive Officer to the project manager or, in the absence of a separate project manager, to the vehicle manufacturers upon demonstration that a vehicle has been placed in a project. Credits shall be allocated to vehicle manufacturers by the Executive Officer in accordance with a recommendation submitted in writing by the project manager and signed by all manufacturers participating in the project, and need not be allocated in direct proportion to the number of vehicles placed.


        (6)   Submittal of ZEV Credits. A manufacturer may meet the ZEV requirements in any given model year by submitting to the Executive Officer a commensurate amount of g/mi ZEV credits, consistent with section 1962(b). These credits may be earned previously by the manufacturer or acquired from another party, except that beginning with the 2006 model year credits earned from NEVs offered for sale or placed in service in model years 2001 through 2005 cannot be used to satisfy more than the following portion of a manufacturer’s percentage ZEV obligation that may only be satisfied with credits from ZEVs and, starting with the 2009 model year, the manufacturer’s percentage ZEV obligation that may be satisfied by credits from AT PZEVs but not PZEVs:


ZEV Category

AT PZEV Category

2006

2007 and beyond

2009

2010 and beyond

75%

50%

75%

50%


This limitation applies to credits earned in model years 2001 through 2005 by the same manufacturer or earned in model years 2001 through 2005 by another manufacturer and acquired. The amount of g/mi ZEV credits required to be submitted shall be calculated according to the criteria set forth in this section 1962(g).


        (7)   Requirement to Make Up a ZEV Deficit.


        (A)  General. A manufacturer that produces and delivers for sale in California fewer ZEVs than required in a given model year shall make up the deficit by the end of the next model year by submitting to the Executive Officer a commensurate amount of g/mi ZEV credits, except that credits generated from PZEVs may be used to offset deficits for two model years. The amount of g/mi ZEV credits required to be submitted shall be calculated by [i] adding the number of ZEVs produced and delivered for sale in California by the manufacturer for the model year to the number of ZEV allowances from partial ZEV allowance vehicles produced and delivered for sale in California by the manufacturer for the model year (for a large volume manufacturer, not to exceed that permitted under section 1962(b)(2)), [ii] subtracting that total from the number of ZEVs required to be produced and delivered for sale in California by the manufacturer for the model year, and [iii] multiplying the resulting value by the fleet average requirements for PCs and LDT1s for the model year in which the deficit is incurred.


        (8)   Penalty for Failure to Meet ZEV Requirements. Any manufacturer that fails to produce and deliver for sale in California the required number of ZEVs or submit an appropriate amount of g/mi ZEV credits and does not make up ZEV deficits within the specified time period shall be subject to the Health and Safety Code section 43211 civil penalty applicable to a manufacturer that sells a new motor vehicle that does not meet the applicable emission standards adopted by the state board. The cause of action shall be deemed to accrue when the ZEV deficits are not balanced by the end of the specified time period. For the purposes of Health and Safety Code section 43211, the number of vehicles not meeting the state board’s standards shall be calculated according to the following equation, provided that the percentage of a large volume manufacturer’s ZEV requirement for a given model year that may be satisfied with partial ZEV allowance vehicles or ZEV credits from such vehicles may not exceed the percentages permitted under section 1962(b)(2)(A):

 

(L No. of ZEVs required to be produced and delivered for sale in California for the model year) - (L No. of ZEVs produced and delivered for sale in California for the model year) - (L No. of ZEV allowances from partial ZEV allowance vehicles produced and delivered for sale in California for the model year) - [(Amount of ZEV credits submitted for the model year) / (the fleet average requirement for PCs and LDT1s for the model-year)].


        (h)   Test Procedures. The certification requirements and test procedures for determining compliance with this section 1962 are set forth in "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2005 and Subsequent Model Zero-Emission Vehicles, and 2001 and Subsequent Model Hybrid Electric Vehicles, in the Passenger Car, Light-Duty Truck and Medium-Duty Vehicle Classes," adopted by the state board on August 5, 1999, and last amended December 19, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.

        (i)    ZEV-Specific Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section 1962.

        (1)   "Advanced technology PZEV" or "AT PZEV" means any PZEV with an allowance greater than 0.2 before application of the PZEV early introduction phase-in multiplier.

        (2)   "Battery electric vehicle" means any vehicle that operates solely by use of a battery or battery pack, or that is powered primarily through the use of an electric battery or battery pack but uses a flywheel or capacitor that stores energy produced by the electric motor or through regenerative braking to assist in vehicle operation.

        (2.5)        "Electric drive system" means an electric motor and associated power electronics which provide acceleration torque to the drive wheels sometime during normal vehicle operation. This does not include components that could act as a motor, but are configured to act only as a generator or engine starter in a particular vehicle application.

        (3)   "Neighborhood electric vehicle" means a motor vehicle that meets the definition of Low-Speed Vehicle either in section 385.5 of the Vehicle Code or in 49 CFR 571.500 (as it existed on July 1, 2000), and is certified to zero-emission vehicle standards.

        (4)   "Placed in service" means having been sold or leased to an end-user and not to a dealer or other distribution chain entity, and having been individually registered for on-road use by the California Department of Motor Vehicles.(4.5)     "Regenerative braking" means the partial recovery of the energy normally dissipated into friction braking that is returned as electrical current to an energy storage device.

         (5)   "Specialty ZEV" means a ZEV that is designed for a commercial or governmental fleet application, and either [i] has the same zero emissions energy storage device and chassis as an existing ZEV from which it is modified, or [ii] in the case of a vehicle that is not based on an existing ZEV platform, is optimized for a particular duty cycle, such as urban delivery service, that conflicts with optimization for maximum vehicle range.

        (6)   "Type 0, I, II, and III ZEV" all have the meanings set forth in section 1962(d)(5)(A).


        (j)    Abbreviations. The following abbreviations are used in this section 1962:


        "AER" means all-electric range.

        "BEV" means battery electric vehicle.

        "HEV" means hybrid-electric vehicle.

        "LDT" means light-duty truck.

        "LDT1" means a light-truck with a loaded vehicle weight of 0-3750 pounds.

"LDT2" means a "LEV II" light-duty truck with a loaded vehicle weight of 3751 pounds to a gross vehicle weight of 8500 pounds, or a "LEV I" light-duty truck with a loaded vehicle weight of 3751-5750 pounds.

        "MDV" means medium-duty vehicle.

        "Non-Methane Organic Gases" or "NMOG" means the total mass of oxygenated and non-oxygenated hydrocarbon emissions.

        "MY" means model year.

        "NEV" means neighborhood electric vehicle.

        "NOx" means oxides of nitrogen.

        "PC" means passenger car.

"PZEV" means any vehicle that is delivered for sale in California and that qualifies for a partial ZEV allowance of at least 0.2.

        "SOC" means state of charge.

        "SULEV" means super-ultra-low-emission-vehicle.

        "UDDS" means urban dynamometer driving cycle.

        "ULEV" means ultra-low emission vehicle.

        "VMT" means vehicle miles traveled.

        "ZEV" means zero-emission vehicle.


        (k)   Severability. Each provision of this section is severable, and in the event that any provision of this section is held to be invalid, the remainder of this article remains in full force and effect.

 

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 43018, 43101, 43104 and 43105, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39667, 43000, 43009.5, 43013, 43018, 43100, 43101, 43101.5, 43102, 43104, 43105, 43106, 43204, and 43205.5, Health and Safety Code.


§1962.1. Electric Vehicle Charging Requirements.

(a)   Applicability. This section applies to (1) all battery electric vehicles that qualify for 1.0 or greater ZEV credit under section 1962, and (2) all hybrid electric vehicles that are capable of being recharged by a battery charger that transfers energy from the electricity grid to the vehicle for purposes of recharging the vehicle traction battery, other than battery electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles that are only capable of Level 1 charging.

(b)   Definitions.

        (1)   The definitions in section 1962 apply to this section.

        (2)    "Level 1 charging" means a charging method that allows an electric vehicle or hybrid electric vehicle to be charged by having its charger connected to the most common grounded receptacle (NEMA 5-15R). A vehicle that is only capable of Level 1 charging is one that is charged by an on-board or off-board charger capable of accepting energy from the existing AC supply network. The maximum power is 12 amps, with a branch circuit rating of 15 amps, and continuous power of 1.44 kilowatts.

(c)   Requirements. Beginning with the 2006 model year, all vehicles identified in subsection (a) must be equipped with a conductive charger inlet port which meets all the specifications contained in Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice SAE J1772 REV NOV 2001, SAE Electric Vehicle Conductive Charge Coupler, which is incorporated herein by reference. All such vehicles must be equipped with an on-board charger with a minimum output of 3.3 kilovolt amps.

 

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 43018, 43101, 43104 and 43105, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39667, 43000, 43009.5, 43013, 43018, 43100, 43101, 43101.5, 43102, 43104, 43105, 43106, 43107, 43204, and 43205.5, Health and Safety Code.


§1965. Emission Control and Smog Index Labels - 1979 and Subsequent Model-Year Motor Vehicles.


        In addition to all other requirements, emission control labels are required by the California certification procedures contained in the "California Motor Vehicle Emission Control and Smog Index Label Specifications for 1978 through 2003 Model Year Motorcycles, Light-, Medium- And Heavy-Duty Engines And Vehicles," adopted March 1, 1978, as last amended September 5, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference, the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Passenger Cars, Light-Duty trucks and Medium-Duty Vehicles," incorporated by reference in §1961(d), the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Diesel-Engines and Vehicles," incorporated by reference in §1956.8(b), the "California Interim Certification Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Hybrid-Electric Vehicle Classes," incorporated by reference in §1956.8(b) and (d), and the "California Exhaust Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2004 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Otto-Cycle Engines," incorporated by reference in §1956.8(d). Smog index labels for passenger cars and light-duty trucks shall conform to the "California Smog Index Label Specifications," adopted September 5, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference. Motorcycles shall meet the requirements of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations section 86.413-78, as last amended October 28, 1977, which is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, and 43200, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 43000, 43013, 43100, 43101, 43102, 43103, 43104, 43107, and 43200, Health and Safety Code.


§1976. Standards and Test Procedures for Motor Vehicle Fuel Evaporative Emissions.


        (a) [Fuel evaporative emissions standards for 1970 through 1977 model passenger cars and light-duty trucks; not set forth]


        (b)(1) Evaporative emissions for 1978 and subsequent model gasoline-fueled, 1983 and subsequent model liquefied petroleum gas-fueled, and 1993 and subsequent model alcohol-fueled motor vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles subject to exhaust emission standards under this article, except petroleum-fueled diesel vehicles, compressed natural gas-fueled vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles that have sealed fuel systems which can be demonstrated to have no evaporative emissions, and motorcycles, shall not exceed the following standards:


        (A)  For vehicles identified below, tested in accordance with the test procedure based on the Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determination as set forth in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, sections 86.130-78 through 86.143-90 as they existed July 1, 1989, the evaporative emission standards are:


Vehicle Type

Model Year

Hydrocarbons(1)

Diurnal + Hot Soak (grams/test)

50K miles

Passenger cars

1978 and 1979

6

Light-duty trucks

6

Medium-duty vehicles

6

Heavy-duty vehicles

6

Passenger cars

1980-1994(2)

2

Light-duty trucks

2

Medium-duty vehicles

2

Heavy-duty vehicles

2


1      Organic Material Hydrocarbon Equivalent, for alcohol-fueled vehicles.

2      Other than hybrid electric vehicles.


        (B)  For the vehicles identified below, tested in accordance with the test procedure which includes the running loss test, the hot soak test, and the 72 hour diurnal test, the evaporative emission standards are:


Vehicle Type

Model Year

Hydrocarbons(1)

Three-Day Diurnal +Hot Soak (grams/test)

Useful Life(2)

Running Loss

(grams/mile)

Useful Life (2)

Passenger cars

1995 through 2005(3)

2

0.05

Light-duty trucks

2

0.05

Medium-duty vehicles

(6,001-8,500 lbs. GVWR)

 

 

   with fuel tanks < 30 gallons

2

0.05

   with fuel tanks 30 gallons

2.5

0.05

(8,501-14,000 lbs. GVWR)(4)

3

0.05

Heavy-duty vehicles

(over 14,000 lbs. GVWR)

2

0.05

Hybrid electric passenger cars

1993 through 2005(5)

2

0.05

Hybrid electric light-duty trucks

2

0.05

Hybrid electric medium-duty vehicles

2

0.05


1      Organic Material Hydrocarbon Equivalent for alcohol-fueled vehicles.

2      For purposes of this paragraph, "useful life" shall have the same meaning as provided in section 2112, title 13, California Code of Regulations. Approval of vehicles which are not exhaust emission tested using a chassis dynamometer pursuant to section 1960.1 or 1961, title 13, California Code of Regulations shall be based on an engineering evaluation of the system and data submitted by the applicant.

3      The running loss and useful life three-day diurnal plus hot soak evaporative emission standards (hereinafter "running loss and useful life standards") shall be phased-in beginning with the 1995 model year. Each manufacturer, except ultra-small volume and small volume manufacturers, shall certify the specified percent (a) of passenger cars and (b) of light-duty trucks, medium-duty vehicles and heavy-duty vehicles to the running loss and useful life standards according to the following schedule:


Model

Year

Minimum Percentage of Vehicles

Certified to Running Loss and

Useful Life Standards*

1995

1996

1997

10 percent

30 percent

50 percent

 

*The minimum percentage of motor vehicles of each vehicle type required to be certified to the running loss and useful life standards shall be based on the manufacturer’s projected California model-year sales (a) of passenger cars and (b) of light-duty trucks, medium-duty vehicles and heavy-duty vehicles. Optionally, the percentage of motor vehicles can also be based on the manufacturer’s projected California model-year sales (a) of passenger cars and light-duty trucks and (b) of medium-duty vehicles and heavy-duty vehicles.


Beginning with the 1998 model year, all motor vehicles subject to the running loss and useful life standards, except those produced by ultra-small volume manufacturers, shall be certified to the specified standards. In the 1999 through the 2005 model years, all motor vehicles subject to the running loss and useful life standards, including those produced by ultra-small volume manufacturers, shall be certified to the specified standards.


All 1995 through 1998 model-year motor vehicles which are not subject to running loss and useful life standards pursuant to the phase-in schedule shall comply with the 50,000-mile standards in effect for 1980 through 1994 model-year vehicles.

 

4      For the 1995 model year only, the evaporative emission standards for complete vehicles in this weight range shall be 2.0 grams/test and compliance with the evaporative emission standards shall be based on the SHED conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, sections 86.130-78 through 86.143-90 as they existed July 1, 1989. For the 1995 through 2005 model years, the evaporative emission standards for incomplete vehicles in this weight range shall be 2.0 grams/test and compliance with the evaporative emission standards shall be based on the test procedures specified in paragraph 4.g. of the "California Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1978 and Subsequent Model Motor Vehicles."

5      The running loss and useful life standards for all hybrid electric vehicles shall be effective beginning in the 1993 model year.


(C)  For vehicles identified below, tested in accordance with the test procedure which includes the hot soak test and the 48 hour diurnal test, the evaporative emission standards are:


Vehicle Type

Model Year

Hydrocarbons(1)

Two-Day Diurnal + Hot Soak (grams/test)

Useful Life(2)

Passenger cars

1996 through 2005(3)

2.5

Light-duty trucks

2.5

Medium-duty vehicles

(6,001-8,500 lbs. GVWR)

   with fuel tanks < 30 gallons

   with fuel tanks 30 gallons

(8,501-14,000 lbs. GVWR)



2.5

3.0

3.5

Heavy-duty vehicles

(over 14,000 lbs. GVWR)

4.5

Hybrid electric passenger cars

1996 through 2005(3)

2.5

Hybrid electric light-duty trucks

2.5

Hybrid electric medium-duty vehicles

2.5


1      Organic Material Hydrocarbon Equivalent for alcohol-fueled vehicles.

2      For purposes of this paragraph, "useful life" shall have the same meaning as provided in section 2112, title 13, California Code of Regulations. Approval of vehicles which are not exhaust emission tested using a chassis dynamometer pursuant to section 1960.1 or 1961, title 13, California Code of Regulations shall be based on an engineering evaluation of the system and data submitted by the applicant.

3      The two-day diurnal plus hot soak evaporative emission standards (hereinafter "supplemental standards") shall be phased-in beginning with the 1996 model year. Those vehicles certified under the running loss and useful life standards for the 1996 through 2005 model years must also be certified under the supplemental standards.


        (D)  Zero-emission vehicles shall produce zero fuel evaporative emissions under any and all possible operational modes and conditions.


        (E)  The optional zero-fuel evaporative emission standards for the three-day and two-day diurnal-plus-hot-soak tests are 0.35 grams per test for passenger cars, 0.50 grams per test for light-duty trucks 6,000 lbs. GVWR and under, and 0.75 grams per test for light-duty trucks from 6,001 to 8,500 lbs. GVWR, to account for vehicle non-fuel evaporative emissions (resulting from paints, upholstery, tires, and other vehicle sources). Vehicles demonstrating compliance with these evaporative emission standards shall also have zero (0.0) grams of fuel evaporative emissions per test for the three-day and two-day diurnal-plus-hot-soak tests. The "useful life" shall be 15 years or 150,000 miles, whichever occurs first. In lieu of demonstrating compliance with the zero (0.0) grams of fuel evaporative emissions per test over the three-day and two-day diurnal-plus-hot-soak tests, the manufacturer may submit for advance Executive Officer approval a test plan to demonstrate that the vehicle has zero (0.0) grams of fuel evaporative emissions throughout its useful life.


Additionally, in the case of a SULEV vehicle for which a manufacturer is seeking a partial ZEV credit, the manufacturer may prior to certification elect to have measured fuel evaporative emissions reduced by a specified value in all certification and in-use testing of the vehicle as long as measured mass exhaust emissions of NMOG for the vehicle are increased in all certification and in-use testing. The measured fuel evaporative emissions shall be reduced in increments of 0.1 gram per test, and the measured mass exhaust emissions of NMOG from the vehicle shall be increased by a gram per mile factor, to be determined by the Executive Officer, for every 0.1 gram per test by which the measured fuel evaporative emissions are reduced. For the purpose of this calculation, the evaporative emissions shall be measured, in grams per test, to a minimum of three significant figures.


        (F)   For the 2004 and subsequent model motor vehicles identified below, tested in accordance with the test procedures described in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, sections 86.130-78 through 86.143-90 as they existed July 1, 1989 and as modified by the "California Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Motor Vehicles" incorporated by reference in section 1976(c), the evaporative emission standards are:


Vehicle Type

Hydrocarbon(1) Standards(2)(3)(4)

Running Loss

(grams per mile)

Three Day Diurnal + Hot Soak

(grams per test)

Two-Day Diurnal + Hot Soak

(grams per test)

Passenger cars

0.05

0.5

0.65

Light-duty trucks (under 8,501 lbs. GVWR)

6,000 lbs. GVWR and under

0.05

0.65

0.85

6,001 - 8,500 lbs. GVWR

0.05

0.9

1.15

Medium-duty vehicles

(8,501 - 14,000 lbs. GVWR)

0.05

1

1.25

Heavy-duty vehicles

(over 14,000 lbs. GVWR)

0.05

1

1.25


1      Organic Material Hydrocarbon Equivalent for alcohol-fueled vehicles.

2      For all vehicles certified to these standards, the "useful life" shall be 15 years or 150,000 miles, whichever first occurs. Approval of vehicles which are not exhaust emission tested using a chassis dynamometer pursuant to section 1960.1 or 1961, title 13, California Code of Regulations shall be based on an engineering evaluation of the system and data submitted by the applicant.

3      (a)   These evaporative emission standards shall be phased-in beginning with the 2004 model year. Each manufacturer, except small volume manufacturers, shall certify at a minimum the specified percentage of its vehicle fleet to the evaporative emission standards in this table or the optional zero-evaporative emission standards in section 1976(b)(1)(E) according to the schedule set forth below. For purposes of this paragraph (a), each manufacturer’s vehicle fleet consists of the total projected California sales of the manufacturer’s gasoline-fueled, liquefied petroleum-fueled and alcohol-fueled passenger cars, light-duty trucks, medium-duty vehicles, and heavy-duty vehicles.


Model Year

Minimum Percentage of Vehicles Certified to the Standards in §§1976(b)(1)(F) and (b)(1)(E)

2004

40

2005

80

2006 and subsequent

100

 

A small volume manufacturer shall certify 100 percent of its 2006 and subsequent model vehicle fleet to the evaporative emission standards in the table or the optional zero-evaporative emission standards in section 1976(b)(1)(E).

 

All 2004 through 2005 model-year motor vehicles which are not subject to these standards or the standards in section 1976(b)(1)(E) pursuant to the phase-in schedule shall comply with the requirements of sections 1976(b)(1)(B) and (C).

 

(b)   A manufacturer may use an "Alternative or Equivalent Phase-in Schedule" to comply with the phase-in requirements. An "Alternative Phase-in" is one that achieves at least equivalent emission reductions by the end of the last model year of the scheduled phase-in. Model-year emission reductions shall be calculated by multiplying the percent of vehicles (based on the manufacturer’s projected California sales volume of the applicable vehicle fleet) meeting the new requirements per model year by the number of model years implemented prior to and including the last model year of the scheduled phase-in. The "cumulative total" is the summation of the model-year emission reductions (e.g., the three model-year 40/80/100 percent phase-in schedule would be calculated as: (40%*3 years) + (80%*2 years) + (100%*1 year) =380). The required cumulative total for the phase-in of these standards is 380 emission reductions. Any alternative phase-in that results in an equal or larger cumulative total than the required cumulative total by the end of the last model year of the scheduled phase-in shall be considered acceptable by the Executive Officer only if all vehicles subject to the phase-in comply with the respective requirements in the last model year of the required phase-in schedule. A manufacturer shall be allowed to include vehicles introduced before the first model year of the scheduled phase-in (e.g., in the previous example, 10 percent introduced one year before the scheduled phase-in begins would be calculated as: (10%*4 years)=40) and added to the cumulative total.


(c)   These evaporative emission standards do not apply to zero-emission vehicles.

 

4      In-use compliance whole vehicle testing shall not begin until the motor vehicle is at least one year from the production date and has accumulated a minimum of 10,000 miles. For vehicles introduced prior to the 2007 model year, in-use compliance standards of 1.75 times the "Three-Day Diurnal + Hot-Soak" and "Two-Day Diurnal + Hot-Soak" gram per test standards shall apply for only the first three model years of an evaporative family certified to a new standard.


(b)(2) [Evaporative emissions standards for gasoline-fueled motorcycles; not set forth]

 

(c)   The test procedures for determining compliance with the standards in subsection (b) above applicable to 1978 through 2000 model year vehicles are set forth in "California Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1978-2000 Model Motor Vehicles," adopted by the state board on April 16, 1975, as last amended August 5, 1999, which is incorporated herein by reference. The test procedures for determining compliance with standards applicable to 2001 and subsequent model year vehicles are set forth in the "California Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Motor Vehicles," adopted by the state board on August 5, 1999, which is incorporated herein by reference.


(d) [Applies to motorcycles only; not set forth]


(e) [Applies to motorcycles only; not set forth]


(f)(2)       For the purposes of this section, "ultra-small volume manufacturer" means any vehicle manufacturer with California sales less than or equal to 300 new vehicles per model year based on the average number of vehicles sold by the manufacturer in the previous three consecutive model years, and "small volume manufacturer" means, for 1978 through 2000 model years, any vehicle manufacturer with California sales less than or equal to 3000 new vehicles per model year based on the average number of vehicles sold by the manufacturer in the previous three consecutive model years. For 2001 and subsequent model motor vehicles, "small volume manufacturer" has the meaning set forth in section 1900(a).

 

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 39667, 43013, 43018, 43101, 43104 and 43107, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39003, 39500, 39667, 43000, 43013, 43018, 43100, 43101, 43102, 43104 and 43107, Health and Safety Code.


§1978. Standards and Test Procedures for Vehicle Refueling Emissions.


        (a)(1)       Vehicle refueling emissions for 1998 and subsequent model gasoline-fueled, alcohol-fueled, diesel-fueled, liquefied petroleum gas-fueled, fuel-flexible, and hybrid electric passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating less than 8,501 pounds, shall not exceed the following standards. Natural gas-fueled vehicles are exempt from meeting these refueling standards, but the refueling receptacles on natural gas-fueled vehicles must comply with the receptacle provisions of the American National Standards Institute/ American Gas Association Standard for Compressed Natural Gas Vehicle Fueling Connection Devices, ANSI/AGA NGV1 standard-1994, which is incorporated herein by reference. The standards apply equally to certification and in-use vehicles.

 

Hydrocarbons (for gasoline-fueled, diesel-fueled, and hybrid electric vehicles): 0.20 gram per gallon of fuel dispensed.

 

Organic Material Hydrocarbon Equivalent (for alcohol-fueled, fuel-flexible, and hybrid electric vehicles): 0.20 gram per gallon of fuel dispensed.

 

Hydrocarbons (for liquefied petroleum gas-fueled vehicles): 0.15 gram per gallon of fuel dispensed.


        (2)   Vehicles powered by diesel fuel are not required to conduct testing to demonstrate compliance with the refueling emission standards set forth above, provided that all of the following provisions are met:


        (A)  The manufacturer can attest to the following evaluation: "Due to the low vapor pressure of diesel fuel and the vehicle tank temperatures, hydrocarbon vapor concentrations are low and the vehicle meets the 0.20 grams/gallon refueling emission standard without a control system."


        (B)  The certification requirement described in paragraph (A) is provided in writing and applies for the full useful life of the vehicle, as defined in section 2112.


        In addition to the above provisions, the ARB reserves the authority to require testing to enforce compliance and to prevent noncompliance with the refueling emission standard.


        Vehicles certified to the refueling emission standard under this provision shall not be counted in the phase-in sales percentage compliance determinations.


        (3)   The manufacturer shall adhere to the following phase-in schedule, as determined by projected vehicle sales throughout the United States, with the exception of small volume manufacturers.


ORVR Model Year Phase-In Schedule

Class of Vehicle

40% Fleet

80% Fleet

100% Fleet

Passenger Cars

1998

1999

2000

Light-Duty Trucks 0-6,000 lbs. GVWR

2001

2002

2003

Light-Duty Trucks / Medium-Duty Vehicles 6,001-8,500 lbs. GVWR

2004

2005

2006


        (A)  Prior to the 2001 model year, small volume manufacturers are defined for purposes of this section as any vehicle manufacturer with California actual sales less than or equal to 3000 new vehicles per model year based on the average number of vehicles sold by the manufacturer in the previous three consecutive years.


        (B)  Small volume manufacturers of passenger cars, as defined in subsection (a)(3)(A), are exempt from the implementation schedule in subsection (a)(3) for model years 1998 and 1999. For small volume manufacturers of passenger cars, the standards of subsection (a)(1), and the associated test procedures, shall not apply until model year 2000, when 100 percent compliance with the standards of this section is required. Small volume manufacturers of light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles are not exempt from the implementation schedule in subsection (a)(3).


        (b)   The test procedures for determining compliance with standards applicable to 1998 through 2000 gasoline, alcohol, diesel, and hybrid electric passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles are set forth in the "California Refueling Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 1998-2000 Model Motor Vehicles," as amended August 5, 1999, which is incorporated herein by reference. The test procedures for determining compliance with standards applicable to 2001 and subsequent gasoline, alcohol, diesel, and hybrid electric passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles are set forth in the "California Refueling Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model Motor Vehicles," adopted August 5, 1999, and last amended September 5, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39667, 43013, 43018, 43101, and 43104, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39003, 39500, 39667, 43000, 43013, 43018, 43101, 43102, and 43104, Health and Safety Code.


§2062. Assembly-Line Test Procedures - 1998 and Subsequent Model Years.


        New 1998 through 2000 model-year passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles, subject to certification and manufactured for sale in California, except for zero-emission vehicles and medium-duty vehicles certified according to the optional standards and test procedures of Section 1956.8, Title 13, California Code of Regulations, shall be tested in accordance with the "California Assembly-Line Test Procedures for 1998 Through 2000 Model-Year Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Vehicles." adopted June 24, 1996, and last amended August 5, 1999, which is incorporated herein by reference. New 2001 and subsequent model-year passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles, subject to certification and manufactured for sale in California, except for zero-emission vehicles and medium-duty vehicles certified according to the optional standards and test procedures of Section 1956.8, Title 13, California Code of Regulations, shall be tested in accordance with the "California Assembly-Line Test Procedures for 2001 and Subsequent Model-Year Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Vehicles." adopted August 5, 1999, which is incorporated herein by reference. These test procedures shall also apply to federally certified light-duty motor vehicles, except as provided in "Guidelines for Certification of 1983 and Subsequent Model-Year Federally Certified Light-Duty Motor Vehicles for Sale in California," adopted July 20, 1982, as last amended July 12, 1991, which is incorporated herein by reference.

 

NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 39515, 39600, 39601, 43013, 43018, 43101, 43104 and 43210, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39500, 43000, 43013, 43018, 43100, 43101, 43101.5, 43102, 43104, 43105, 43106, 43204, 43210, 43211, and 43212, Health and Safety Code.


§2101. Compliance Testing and Inspection - New Vehicle Selection Evaluation, and Enforcement Action.


        (a)   The Executive Officer may, with respect to any new vehicle engine family, test group or subgroup being sold, offered for sale, or manufactured for sale in California, order a vehicle manufacturer to make available for compliance testing and/or inspection a reasonable number of vehicles, and may direct that the vehicles be delivered to the state board at the Haagen-Smit Laboratory, 9528 Telstar Avenue, El Monte, California. Vehicles shall be selected at random from sources specified by the Executive Officer according to a method approved by him/her, which insofar as practical shall exclude (1) vehicles manufactured pursuant to the specific order of an ultimate purchaser or (2) vehicles the selection of which, if not excluded, would result in an unreasonable disruption of the manufacturer’s distribution system.


        A subgroup may be selected for compliance testing only if the Executive Officer has reason to believe that the emissions characteristics of that subgroup are substantially in excess of the emissions of the engine family or test group as a whole.


        (b)   If the vehicles are selected for compliance testing, the selection and testing of vehicles and the evaluation of data shall be made in accordance with the "California New Vehicle Compliance Test Procedures," adopted by the state board on June 13, 1976, and last amended August 5, 1999. Motorcycles scheduled for compliance testing shall be selected, tested, and evaluated in accordance with the "California New Motorcycle Compliance Test Procedures," adopted by the state board on June 30, 1977, and amended November 24, 1981.


        (c)   If the Executive Officer determines, in accordance with the "California New Vehicle Compliance Test Procedures," or the "California New Motorcycle Compliance Test Procedures" that an engine family, test group, or any subgroup within an engine family or test group, exceeds the emission standards for one or more pollutants, the Executive Officer shall notify the manufacturer and may invoke Section 2109. Prior to invoking Section 2109, the Executive Officer shall consider quality audit test results, if any, and any additional test data or other information provided by the manufacturer.


        (d)   Vehicles selected for inspection shall be checked to verify the presence of those emissions-related components specified in the manufacturer’s application for certification, and for the accuracy of any adjustments, part numbers and labels specified in that application. If any vehicle selected for inspection fails to conform to any applicable law in Part 5 (commencing with Section 43000) of Division 26 of the Health and Safety Code, or any regulation adopted by the state board pursuant thereto, other than an emissions standard applied to new vehicles to determine "certification" as specified in Subchapter 1, Article 2 of this Chapter and an assembly-line test procedure specified in Subchapter 2, Article 1 of this Chapter, the executive officer shall notify the manufacturer and may invoke Section 2109. Prior to invoking Section 2109, the executive officer shall consider any information provided by the manufacturer."


        On page 6, line 21, strike "Section 2 of this act constitutes" and insert "Sections 2 and 7 of this act constitute"


        On page 6, after line 22, insert the following:

        "NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. Pursuant to RCW 1.08.015(2), the code reviser shall reorganize section 7 of this act into sections of appropriate length and may otherwise conform capitalization and subdivision numbering to the conventional standard of the Revised Code of Washington."


        Renumber the sections consecutively and correct internal references accordingly. Correct the title.



        Representatives Nixon and Woods spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment.


        Representatives Upthegrove and Morris spoke against adoption of the amendment.


        Representative DeBolt spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment.


SPEAKER'S RULING


        Mr. Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding): "The Speaker would like to take a moment to remind the members to direct their comments to the bill and not the actions or motives of the members of the body. As Reed's Rules states "members must always attack arguments and not the men and women who make them."


        Representatives Orcutt, Woods (again) and Ericksen spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


        Representative Murray spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


        The amendment was not adopted.


{{33950}}        Representative Woods moved the adoption of amendment (292):


        On page 2, line 32, after "vehicles" strike ", and shall amend the rules from time to time," and insert the following:

        ". Two years after the emission standards of the state of California are fully implemented, the department of ecology shall amend its rules"


        Representatives Woods and Orcutt spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


        Representative Cody spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


POINT OF ORDER


        Representative Ericksen: "While I understand the strong feelings on the other side, I urge the members on the other side of the aisle to not make comments with regards to intent with regards to 'poisoning our children' in comments on these amendments."


SPEAKER'S RULING


        Mr. Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding): "The Speaker believes that the good lady said that it was the effect of the amendment and not the intent of the members.

        Representative Ericksen, your point is not well taken."


APPEAL


        Representative Chandler: "Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to appeal the ruling of the Speaker."


        The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) declare the House to be at ease.


        The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) called the House to order.


WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL


        Representative Chandler: "Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I respectfully withdraw my appeal."



SPEAKER'S COMMENTS


                        Mr. Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding): "The Speaker would thank the gentleman from the 15th District. The Speaker would also like to remind the members that the rules of debate in Reed's Rules require members to avoid the use of harsh expressions."


                        Representative Orcutt spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


                        The amendment was not adopted.


{{33951}}                        Representative Woods moved the adoption of amendment (293):


                        On page 2, line 32, after "vehicles" strike all material through "act)" on line 34 and insert ". Amendments to the rules to maintain consistency with the California motor vehicle emissions standards and 42 U.S.C. Sec. 7505 (section 177 of the federal clean air act) must be approved by the legislature"


                        Representatives Woods, Serben, Ericksen, Haler, Pearson, Nixon, Orcutt, Woods (again), Ericksen (again), McDonald, Buri, Ahern, Strow, Sump, Newhouse, Skinner, Dunn, Hinkle, Bailey, Roach and DeBolt spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


                        Representatives Upthegrove and Kagi spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


{{33952}}                        An electronic roll call vote was demanded.


                        The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of amendment (293) to Substitute House Bill No. 1397.


ROLL CALL


                        The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of amendment (293) to Substitute House Bill No. 1397, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 45, Nays - 51, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

                        Voting yea: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Armstrong, Bailey, Buri, Campbell, Chandler, Clements, Condotta, Cox, Crouse, DeBolt, Dunn, Ericksen, Haler, Hankins, Hinkle, Holmquist, Jarrett, Kilmer, Kretz, Kristiansen, Lantz, McCune, McDonald, Newhouse, Nixon, Orcutt, Pearson, Priest, Roach, Rodne, Schindler, Serben, Shabro, Skinner, Strow, Sullivan, P., Sump, Takko, Talcott, Tom, Walsh and Woods - 45.

                        Voting nay: Representatives Appleton, Blake, Chase, Clibborn, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Ericks, Flannigan, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Hasegawa, Hudgins, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kirby, Linville, Lovick, McCoy, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Moeller, Morrell, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ormsby, Pettigrew, Quall, Roberts, Santos, Schual-Berke, Sells, Simpson, Sommers, Springer, Sullivan, B., Upthegrove, Wallace, Williams, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 51.

                        Excused: Representatives Buck and Curtis - 2.


{{33953}}                        Representative Anderson moved the adoption of amendment (047):


                        On page 2, line 34, after "act)." insert "During rule development, the department of ecology shall convene an advisory group composed of industry and consumer group representatives. Any proposed rules or changes to rules shall be subject to review and comment by the advisory group, prior to rule adoption."


        Representatives Anderson and Murray spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


        The amendment was adopted.


{{33954}}        Representative Anderson moved the adoption of amendment (048):


        On page 2, beginning on line 34 strike "Rules shall be applicable to motor vehicles with a model year 2009 and later." and insert "Rules shall be applicable to passenger cars and light duty trucks with a model year 2009 or later and shall be applicable to medium duty passenger vehicles with a model year 2014 or later."


        Representatives Anderson, Ericksen, Nixon, Walsh, Rodne, Woods, Newhouse, Clements and Orcutt spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


        Representatives Simpson, Morris and Murray spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


{{33955}}        An electronic roll call vote was demanded and the demand was sustained.


        The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of amendment (048) to Substitute House Bill No. 1397.


ROLL CALL


        The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of amendment (048) to Substitute House Bill No. 1397, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 42, Nays - 54, Absent - 0, Excused - 2.

        Voting yea: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Armstrong, Bailey, Buri, Campbell, Chandler, Clements, Condotta, Cox, Crouse, DeBolt, Dunn, Ericksen, Haler, Hankins, Hinkle, Holmquist, Jarrett, Kretz, Kristiansen, McCune, McDonald, Morrell, Newhouse, Nixon, Orcutt, Pearson, Priest, Roach, Rodne, Schindler, Serben, Shabro, Skinner, Strow, Sump, Talcott, Tom, Walsh and Woods - 42.

        Voting nay: Representatives Appleton, Blake, Chase, Clibborn, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Ericks, Flannigan, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Hasegawa, Hudgins, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kilmer, Kirby, Lantz, Linville, Lovick, McCoy, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Moeller, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ormsby, Pettigrew, Quall, Roberts, Santos, Schual-Berke, Sells, Simpson, Sommers, Springer, B. Sullivan, P. Sullivan, Takko, Upthegrove, Wallace, Williams, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 54.

        Excused: Representatives Buck and Curtis - 2.


{{33956}}        Representative Nixon moved the adoption of amendment (358):


        On page 2, line 34, after "act)." insert "The order of adoption for the rules required in this section shall include the signature of the governor."


        Representatives Nixon and Murray spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


        Division was demanded. The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) divided the House. The result was 54 - YEAS; 43 -NAYS.

{{33959}}

        The amendment was adopted.


{{33957}}        Representative Wallace moved the adoption of amendment (304):



                        On page 2, line 35, after "2009 and later" insert "if an adjoining state, with a population of greater than three million people, adopts the California air emission standards for motor vehicles effective for model year 2009, otherwise the rules shall be applicable to motor vehicles with a model year 2010 and later"


                        On page 6, line 10, strike "for model year 2009 or later" and insert "starting with the model year as provided in section 2 of this act"


                        Representatives Wallace and Schindler spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


                        Representatives Sump and Ericksen spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


                        The amendment was adopted.


{{33958}}                        Representative Shabro moved the adoption of amendment (295):


                        On page 3, after line 5, insert the following:

                        "NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 43.19 RCW to read as follows:

                        (1) Any agency, board, or commission of state government; any institution of higher education; any county, city, town, school district or other political subdivision or taxing district of the state shall exclusively purchase zero emission vehicles and partial zero emission vehicles, except as authorized in subsection (3) of this section.

                        (2) To support local economies and tax bases, vehicles purchased under this section shall be purchased within the state from automotive dealers registered in the state of Washington.

                        (3) Exempt from this requirement are law enforcement patrol cars, vehicles used to transport prisoners, vehicles used by fire departments, and vehicles used for construction, maintenance and repair activities."


                        Renumber the remaining sections consecutively and correct internal references. Correct the title.


                        Representatives Shabro, Armstrong and Ahern spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


                        Representative B. Sullivan spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


                        The amendment was not adopted.


{{33960}}                        Representative Linville moved the adoption of amendment (300):


                        On page 3, after line 5, insert the following:


                        "NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. (1) In recognition of the provisions of the federal clean air act which require a minimum phase-in period of three model years for adoption of California motor vehicle emission standards, the implementing rules shall include a system of early credits and banking for manufacturers for zero emission vehicles produced and sold earlier than the implementation date for the standards in Washington. Beginning with the model year in which the new standards become effective, each manufacturer’s fleet of passenger cars and light duty trucks delivered for sale in the state of Washington shall proportionately conform to the zero emission vehicle requirements of Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, including early credit and banking provisions set forth in Title 13 of the Code of California Regulations using Washington specific vehicle numbers. A manufacturer shall be given early Washington zero emission vehicle credits proportionally equivalent to the zero emission vehicle credits possessed by the requesting manufacturer for use in the state of California on January 1 of the model year the California standards become effective in Washington.

        (2)In addition, an alternative means of compliance with the requirements of subsection 1 of this section shall be created in the implementing rules provided for in section 2 of this act. The alternative means of compliance shall allow a manufacturer to earn Washington zero emission vehicle credits beginning with the 2005 model year. The alternative means of compliance shall be developed to be consistent in concept with the alternative compliance systems developed for the states of Connecticut, New York and Maine as they adopted the zero emission vehicle provisions of the California motor vehicle standards and shall contain a Washington multiplier consistent with the multipliers in those systems. The implementing rules shall require timely notification by the manufacturer to the department of ecology of an election to use the alternative means of compliance."


        On page 6, line 21, strike "Section 2 of this act constitutes" and insert "Sections 2 and 3 of this act constitute"


        Renumber the sections consecutively and correct internal references accordingly. Correct the title.


        Representative Linville spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


        Representatives Woods, Ericksen and Shabro spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


        The amendment was adopted.


        Representative Ericksen moved adoption of amendment (236):


        On page 6, after line 15, insert the following:

        "Sec. 6. RCW 46.37.540 and 1983 c 3 s 119 are each amended to read as follows:

        (1) The legislature intends to make it illegal for persons to turn forward the odometer on a new car to avoid compliance with the emissions standards required by this act.

        (2) It shall be unlawful for any person to disconnect, turn back, turn forward, or reset the odometer of any motor vehicle with the intent to ((reduce)) change the number of miles indicated on the odometer gauge. A violation of this subsection is a gross misdemeanor."


        Renumber the remaining sections consecutively and correct internal references accordingly. Correct the title.


        Representatives Ericksen, Murray and Sump spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment.


        The amendment was adopted.


        Representative Anderson moved adoption of amendment (296):


        On page 6, line 15, after "requirements." insert "The department of ecology may exempt public safety vehicles from meeting the standards where the department finds that vehicles necessary to meet the needs of public safety agencies are not otherwise reasonably available."


        Representatives Anderson, Murray and Woods spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment.


        The amendment was adopted.


        Representative Woods moved adoption of amendment (294):



                        On page 6, line 28, after "act" delete all material through "immediately" on page 7, line 1 and insert "take effect after adoption of the California motor vehicle emissions standards by the states of Oregon, Idaho, and Montana"


                        Representatives Woods, Schindler, Ahern, Anderson, Woods (again), Serben, McDonald, Ericksen, Strow, Condotta, Orcutt and Dunn spoke in favor of adoption of the amendment.


                        Representative Hudgins spoke against adoption of the amendment.


                        An electronic roll call vote was demanded and the demand was sustained.


MOTION


                        On motion of Representative Clements, Representative Hinkle was excused.


                        The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) stated the question before the House to be adoption of amendment (294) to Substitute House Bill No. 1397.


ROLL CALL


                        The Clerk called the roll on the adoption of amendment (294) to Substitute House Bill No. 1397, and the amendment was not adopted by the following vote: Yeas - 41, Nays - 54, Absent - 0, Excused - 3.

                        Voting yea: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Anderson, Armstrong, Bailey, Buri, Campbell, Chandler, Clements, Condotta, Cox, Crouse, DeBolt, Dunn, Ericksen, Haler, Hankins, Holmquist, Jarrett, Kretz, Kristiansen, McCune, McDonald, Newhouse, Nixon, Orcutt, Pearson, Priest, Roach, Rodne, Schindler, Serben, Shabro, Skinner, Strow, Sump, Takko, Talcott, Tom, Walsh and Woods - 41.

                        Voting nay: Representatives Appleton, Blake, Chase, Clibborn, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dickerson, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Ericks, Flannigan, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Hasegawa, Hudgins, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kilmer, Kirby, Lantz, Linville, Lovick, McCoy, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Moeller, Morrell, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ormsby, Pettigrew, Quall, Roberts, Santos, Schual-Berke, Sells, Simpson, Sommers, Springer, B. Sullivan, P. Sullivan, Upthegrove, Wallace, Williams, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 54.

                        Excused: Representatives Buck Curtis, and Hinkle - 3.


{{33962}}                        Representative Anderson moved the adoption of amendment (327):


                        On page 6, after line 15, insert the following:


                        "NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. The office of financial management shall provide an annual progress report to the appropriate committees of the legislature. The office of financial management, in conjunction with the departments of licensing, revenue, and ecology, shall report on the availability of vehicles meeting the standards, the progress of automobile industries in meeting the requirements of the standards, and any other matters relevant to the success of auto-related industries in implementing these requirements."


                        Renumber the remaining sections consecutively and correct internal references accordingly. Correct the title.


                        Representatives Anderson and Murray spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


                        The amendment was adopted.


{{33963}}        Representative Nixon moved the adoption of amendment (356):


        On page 7, after line 1, insert the following:


        "NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. (1) The department of ecology must secure an agreement in writing from the California air resources board that the operations of the air resources board conform to the requirements of the following acts of the state of Washington:

        (a) the regulatory fairness act codified in 19.85 RCW;

        (b) the administrative procedures act codified in 34.05 RCW;

        (c) the state register act codified in 34.08 RCW;

        (d) preservation of public records requirements codified in 40.14 RCW;

        (e) the open public records act codified in 42.17 RCW;

        (f) provisions of law relating to the misconduct of public officers codified in 42.20;

        (g) the open public meetings act codified in 42.30 RCW;

        (h) ethics in public service requirements codified in 42.52 RCW; and,

        (i) fiscal and performance audits requirements codified in 43.09 RCW.

        (2) If a letter of agreement described in subsection 1 is not signed by the California air resources board prior to the effective date of section 2 of this act, this act is null and void."


        Correct the title.


        Representatives Nixon, Ericksen, Haler and Orcutt spoke in favor of the adoption of the amendment.


        Representative McDermott spoke against the adoption of the amendment.


        The amendment was not adopted.


{{33964}}        The bill was ordered engrossed.


{{33965}}        There being no objection, the rules were suspended, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.


        Representatives Murray, Morris, Simpson and Wallace spoke in favor of passage of the bill.


        Representatives Woods, Schindler and Ericksen spoke against the passage of the bill.


SPEAKER'S RULING


        The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding): "The Speaker would ask the members not to assign motives to other members and to please stick to the specifics of the amendment or the bill."


        Representatives Cox, Haler, Roach, Clements, Nixon, Campbell and Armstrong spoke against the passage of the bill.


        The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding) stated the question before the House to be the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1397.


ROLL CALL


        The Clerk called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1397 and the bill passed the House by the following vote: Yeas - 53, Nays - 42, Absent - 0, Excused - 3.


                        Voting yea: Representatives Anderson, Appleton, Chase, Clibborn, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dickerson, Dunshee, Ericks, Flannigan, Green, Hasegawa, Hudgins, Hunt, Hunter, Jarrett, Kagi, Kenney, Kilmer, Kirby, Lantz, Linville, Lovick, McCoy, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Moeller, Morrell, Morris, Murray, O'Brien, Ormsby, Pettigrew, Priest, Quall, Roberts, Rodne, Santos, Schual-Berke, Sells, Simpson, Sommers, Springer, B. Sullivan, P. Sullivan, Tom, Upthegrove, Wallace, Williams, Wood and Mr. Speaker - 53.

                        Voting nay: Representatives Ahern, Alexander, Armstrong, Bailey, Blake, Buri, Campbell, Chandler, Clements, Condotta, Cox, Crouse, DeBolt, Dunn, Eickmeyer, Ericksen, Fromhold, Grant, Haigh, Haler, Hankins, Holmquist, Kessler, Kretz, Kristiansen, McCune, McDonald, Newhouse, Nixon, Orcutt, Pearson, Roach, Schindler, Serben, Shabro, Skinner, Strow, Sump, Takko, Talcott, Walsh and Woods - 42.

                        Excused: Representatives Buck, Curtis and Hinkle - 3.


                        ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1397, having received the necessary constitutional majority, was declared passed.


{{34097}}                        There being no objections, the bills, memorials and resolutions listed on the second and third reading calendars were referred to the Committee on Rules.

{{34098}}

                        There being no objection, the House reverted to the fourth order of business.


{{34099}}                                      INTRODUCTION & FIRST READING

 

{{34100}}HB 2292                 by Representatives Lantz, Cody, Campbell, Kirby, Flannigan, Williams, Linville, Springer, Clibborn, Wood, Fromhold, Morrell, Hunt, Moeller, Green, Kilmer, Conway, O'Brien, Sells, Kenney, Kessler, Chase, Upthegrove, Ormsby, Lovick, McCoy and Santos


                         AN ACT Relating to improving health care by increasing patient safety, reducing medical errors, reforming medical malpractice insurance, and resolving medical malpractice claims fairly without imposing mandatory limits on damage awards or fees; amending RCW 5.64.010, 4.24.260, 18.71.015, 18.130.160, 18.130.172, 43.70.510, 48.18.290, 48.18.2901, 48.18.100, 48.18.103, 48.19.043, 48.19.060, 4.16.190, 7.04.010, and 7.70.080; reenacting and amending RCW 69.41.010; reenacting RCW 4.16.350; adding a new section to chapter 18.130 RCW; adding new sections to chapter 7.70 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 42.17 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 48.19 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 48.18 RCW; adding a new chapter to Title 70 RCW; adding a new chapter to Title 48 RCW; adding a new chapter to Title 7 RCW; creating new sections; prescribing penalties; and providing for submission of this act to a vote of the people.


                        Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

 

{{34101}}HB 2293                 by Representatives Williams, Serben, Hasegawa, Fromhold, Darneille, Moeller, Kirby, Linville, Simpson, Chase, Green, P. Sullivan, Quall, Kagi, Ormsby, Hunt, Cox, Buri, Haler, Appleton, Morrell, Kenney and Santos


                         AN ACT Relating to providing information regarding results of the Washington assessment of student learning on high school transcripts; and amending RCW 28A.305.220 and 28A.655.061.


                        Referred to Committee on Education.

 

{{34102}}2SSB 5154                      by Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Pridemore and Zarelli)


         AN ACT Relating to a leasehold excise tax exemption for certain historical property; and amending RCW 82.29A.130.


        Referred to Committee on Finance.

 

{{34103}}SSB 5157        by Senate Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Senators Regala, Carrell, Kline, Roach, Zarelli, Kastama, Oke, Franklin, Brandland, McCaslin and Shin)


         AN ACT Relating to local law enforcement automatic fingerprint identification systems; amending RCW 43.43.570; and creating a new section.


        Referred to Committee on Criminal Justice & Corrections.

 

{{34104}}SB 5311  by Senators Rasmussen, Jacobsen, McAuliffe, Mulliken, Stevens, Roach, Shin, Kohl-Welles and Spanel


         AN ACT Relating to creating an autism task force; and creating new sections.


        Referred to Committee on Children & Family Services.

 

{{34105}}2SSB 5370      by Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Brown, Benson, Shin, Sheldon, Eide, Kohl-Welles and McAuliffe)


         AN ACT Relating to the economic development strategic reserve account; adding a new section to chapter 43.330 RCW; and creating a new section.


        Referred to Committee on Economic Development, Agriculture & Trade.

 

{{34106}}E2SSB 5454   by Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Hargrove, Kline, Delvin, Thibaudeau, Johnson, Shin, Stevens, Rockefeller and Kohl-Welles; by request of Board For Judicial Administration)


         AN ACT Relating to court operations; amending RCW 2.14.010, 2.14.030, 3.58.030, 3.34.025, 3.46.090, 3.50.080, 3.58.010, 35.20.160, 3.62.050, 3.62.060, 4.12.090, 10.46.190, 12.12.030, 12.40.020, 26.12.240, 27.24.070, 36.18.012, 36.18.016, and 36.18.020; adding a new section to chapter 3.46 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 3.50 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 3.58 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 35.20 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 3.62 RCW; creating new sections; and providing an effective date.


        Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

 

{{34107}}SSB 5479        by Senate Committee on Financial Institutions, Housing & Consumer Protection (originally sponsored by Senators Berkey, Benton, Prentice, Esser and McAuliffe)


         AN ACT Relating to the unlawful detainer process under the residential landlord-tenant act; and amending RCW 59.12.070, 59.18.370, and 59.18.365.


        Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

 

{{34108}}ESB 5513       by Senators Haugen, Shin, Kohl-Welles, Rasmussen, Fairley and Prentice



                         AN ACT Relating to restructuring of certain transportation agencies; amending RCW 43.17.020, 47.01.041, 47.01.061, 47.01.071, 47.05.021, 47.05.030, 47.05.035, 47.05.051, 44.75.020, 44.75.030, 44.75.040, 44.75.050, 44.75.080, 44.75.090, 44.75.100, 44.75.110, 44.75.120, 44.28.161, 35.58.2796, 36.78.070, 41.40.037, 43.10.101, 43.79.270, 43.79.280, 43.88.020, 43.88.030, 43.88.230, 43.105.160, 43.105.190, 44.04.260, 44.28.088, 44.40.025, 46.01.320, 46.01.325, 46.16.705, 46.16.715, 46.16.725, 46.73.010, 47.01.280, 47.04.210, 47.04.220, 47.06.110, 47.06A.020, 47.10.790, 47.10.801, 47.10.802, 47.17.850, 47.26.167, 47.26.170, 47.46.030, 47.46.040, 79A.05.125, 81.80.395, 81.104.110, 82.33.020, 82.70.060, and 82.80.070; reenacting and amending RCW 47.01.101 and 90.03.525; adding new sections to chapter 47.01 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 44.04 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 43.88 RCW; creating new sections; recodifying RCW 44.40.120 and 44.40.025; repealing RCW 44.40.010, 44.40.013, 44.40.015, 44.40.030, 44.40.040, 44.40.090, 44.40.140, 44.40.150, 44.40.161, 53.08.350, 44.40.020, 44.40.070, 44.40.080, 44.40.100, 46.23.040, 47.01.145, 47.05.090, 47.12.360, 47.76.340, 47.74.010, and 47.74.020; providing effective dates; providing an expiration date; and declaring an emergency.


                        Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

{{34109}}SSB 5551                        by Senate Committee on Labor, Commerce, Research & Development (originally sponsored by Senators Hargrove, Hewitt, Schoesler, Mulliken, Parlette and Oke)


                         AN ACT Relating to studying the minimum wage in Washington state; and creating new sections.


                        Referred to Committee on Commerce & Labor.

 

{{34110}}SSB 5584                        by Senate Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Senators Jacobsen, Swecker and Haugen)


                         AN ACT Relating to consolidated rental car facilities at airports; and amending RCW 14.08.120.


                        Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

{{34111}}ESB 5606                       by Senators Pridemore, Schmidt, McAuliffe and Kohl-Welles; by request of Governor Gregoire


                         AN ACT Relating to activation of the national guard; amending RCW 38.08.040 and 38.24.010; and declaring an emergency.


                        Referred to Committee on State Government Operations & Accountability.

 

{{34112}}SSB 5611                        by Senate Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Senators Esser, Kline, Regala, Hewitt, Fairley, McCaslin, Zarelli, Weinstein, Stevens, Johnson, Brandland, Hargrove and Franklin)


                         AN ACT Relating to the interest rate on legal financial obligations; and amending RCW 10.82.090 and 4.56.110.


                        Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

 

{{34113}}SSB 5702                        by Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Zarelli, Kline, Fairley, Regala, Rasmussen and McAuliffe)


         AN ACT Relating to the developmental disabilities community trust account; amending RCW 43.84.092; reenacting and amending RCW 43.84.092 and 43.84.092; adding a new section to chapter 71A.20 RCW; providing effective dates; providing expiration dates; and declaring an emergency.


        Referred to Committee on Capital Budget.

 

{{34114}}SB 5705  by Senators Rockefeller, Schoesler, Rasmussen, Mulliken and McAuliffe


         AN ACT Relating to avoiding fragmentation in bargaining units for classified school employees; and amending RCW 41.56.060.


        Referred to Committee on Commerce & Labor.

 

{{34115}}ESB 5710       by Senators Poulsen, Swecker, Brown, Rockefeller, Regala, Pridemore, Kline, Rasmussen and Kohl-Welles


         AN ACT Relating to the removal of mercury-added components in motor vehicles; adding a new chapter to Title 70 RCW; and prescribing penalties.


        Referred to Committee on Natural Resources, Ecology & Parks.

 

{{34116}}SSB 5717        by Senate Committee on Early Learning, K-12 & Higher Education (originally sponsored by Senators Rockefeller, Benton, Fairley, Oke, Keiser, Zarelli, Shin, Rasmussen and Kohl-Welles)


         AN ACT Relating to K-12 skill centers; and creating new sections.


        Referred to Committee on Education.

 

{{34117}}SSB 5729        by Senate Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Senators Rockefeller, Oke, Regala, Spanel, Sheldon, Shin, Poulsen, Jacobsen and Kohl-Welles)


         AN ACT Relating to ferry fares; and amending RCW 47.60.326.


        Referred to Committee on Transportation.

 

{{34118}}ESSB 5736     by Senate Committee on Financial Institutions, Housing & Consumer Protection (originally sponsored by Senator Spanel)


         AN ACT Relating to the availability of subscription air ambulance services; and creating a new section.


        Referred to Committee on Financial Institutions & Insurance.

 

{{34119}}SB 5831  by Senators Morton and Poulsen


         AN ACT Relating to the minimum standards for construction and maintenance of wells; amending RCW 18.104.020, 18.104.043, 18.104.050, 18.104.055, 18.104.100, 18.104.120, and 18.104.190; and adding a new section to chapter 18.104 RCW.


        Referred to Committee on Economic Development, Agriculture & Trade.

 

{{34120}}SSB 5895        by Senate Committee on Water, Energy & Environment (originally sponsored by Senators Fraser, Poulsen, Morton, Regala, Pridemore, Jacobsen and Kohl-Welles)



                         AN ACT Relating to increased coordination between the Puget Sound recovery partnership and other governmental entities; amending RCW 90.71.005, 90.71.010, 90.71.020, 90.71.030, 90.71.040, 90.71.050, 90.71.060, 90.71.070, 90.71.080, 90.71.100, 90.71.900, 28B.30.632, 43.63A.247, 70.118.090, 70.146.070, 77.60.130, 77.85.210, 79.90.550, 79A.60.510, 79A.60.520, and 90.48.260; adding new sections to chapter 90.71 RCW; and creating a new section.


                        Referred to Committee on Natural Resources, Ecology & Parks.

 

{{34121}}SSB 5899                        by Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections (originally sponsored by Senators Kohl-Welles, Brandland and Rasmussen)


                         AN ACT Relating to background checks; amending RCW 43.43.830, 43.43.832, 43.43.834, 43.43.836, 43.43.838, 43.43.840, 43.43.845, and 10.97.050; and repealing RCW 43.43.835.


                        Referred to Committee on Criminal Justice & Corrections.

 

{{34122}}ESSB 5922                     by Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections (originally sponsored by Senators Stevens, Hargrove, Roach, Schmidt, Zarelli, Carrell and Finkbeiner)


                         AN ACT Relating to investigations of child abuse or neglect; amending RCW 26.44.030, 26.44.100, 26.44.110, 26.44.115, and 13.34.062; and creating a new section.


                        Referred to Committee on Children & Family Services.

 

{{34123}}SB 5979                  by Senators Benson, Carrell, Mulliken, Kastama, Poulsen, Parlette, Hewitt, Esser, Schmidt, Delvin, Berkey, Franklin, Sheldon, Brandland, Swecker, Schoesler, Zarelli, Honeyford, Rasmussen and Oke


                         AN ACT Relating to search and rescue dogs; amending RCW 9.91.170; and prescribing penalties.


                        Referred to Committee on Criminal Justice & Corrections.

 

{{34124}}SSB 6014                        by Senate Committee on Labor, Commerce, Research & Development (originally sponsored by Senators Kline, Parlette, Kohl-Welles and Keiser)


                         AN ACT Relating to industrial insurance claims made due to disaster response; amending RCW 38.52.105; adding a new section to chapter 51.16 RCW; and declaring an emergency.


                        Referred to Committee on Commerce & Labor.

 

{{34126}}SB 5794                  by Senators Prentice, Swecker, Regala, Franklin, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe and Rasmussen; by request of Department of Revenue


                         AN ACT Relating to authorizing a cigarette taxation agreement between the state of Washington and the Puyallup Indian Tribe; amending RCW 82.08.0316 and 82.12.0316; adding a new section to chapter 43.06 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 82.24 RCW; creating a new section; and declaring an emergency.


                        Referred to Committee on Finance.

 

{{34127}}SB 5993                  by Senators Prentice, Doumit, Zarelli, Rasmussen and Kohl-Welles; by request of Office of Financial Management


         AN ACT Relating to funding for crime victims' compensation; adding new sections to 2003 1st sp.s. c 25 (uncodified); making appropriations; and declaring an emergency.

 

{{34125}}SJM 8014       by Senators Thibaudeau, Jacobsen, Fairley, Brown, Prentice, McAuliffe, Regala, Rockefeller, Fraser, Rasmussen, Weinstein, Kline, Keiser and Kohl-Welles


         Requesting that the privatization of social security be rejected.


        Referred to Committee on Children & Family Services.


{{34128}}        There being no objection, the bills and memorial listed on the day's introduction sheet under the fourth order of business were referred to the committees so designated which the exception of SENATE BILL NO. 5993 which was placed on the second reading calendar.


SPEAKER'S PRIVILEGE


        The Speaker (Representative Lovick presiding): "The Speaker would like to take a moment to thank everyone for their hard work during the last few days. It has been very rewarding and we have worked very hard to accomplish a lot. Thank you very much."


{{34130}}        There being no objection, the House advanced to the eleventh order of business.


        There being no objection, the House adjourned until 9:55 a.m., March 17, 2005, the 67th Day of the Regular Session.


FRANK CHOPP, Speaker

RICHARD NAFZIGER, Chief Clerk