EIGHTY-NINTH DAY

MORNING SESSION

Senate Chamber, Olympia, Friday, April 8, 2005

      The Senate was called to order at 9:00 a.m. by President Owen. The Secretary called the roll and announced to the President that all Senators were present except Senators Haugen, McCaslin, Oke and Schoesler.

      The Sergeant at Arms Color Guard consisting of Pages Jayson Orth and Evan Kruschke, presented the Colors. The Reverend Sandra M. Sparks of the Zion-Philadelphia United Church of Christ offered the prayer.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Eide, the reading of the Journal of the previous day was dispensed with and it was approved.

MOTION

At 9:07 a.m., on motion of Senator Eide, the Senate was declared to be at ease subject to the call of the President.

The Senate was called to order at 10:22 a.m. by the President Pro Tempore.

MOTION TO LIMIT DEBATE

Senator Eide: “Madam President, I move that, pursuant to Rule 29, that each member be allowed to speak only once on each question before the Senate, no more than three minutes, until the end of cut off.”

The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the motion by Senator Eide to limit debate pursuant to Rule 29.

The motion by Senator Eide carried and debate was limited through April 15, 2005.

MOTIONS

      On motion of Senator Eide, the Senate advanced to the sixth order of business.

On motion of Senator Regala, Senator Haugen was excused.

NOTICE OF RECONSIDERATION

      Senator Benton haven given notice of his intent to move to reconsider the vote by which Substitute House Bill No. 1495 passed the Senate withdrew the notice.

PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY

Senator Eide: “Where is the bill, then, is it passed or is it on third reading, final?”

REPLY BY THE PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

Senator Franklin: “The bill has passed and will, as amended, be returned to the House.”

SECOND READING

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1112, by Representatives Quall, Bailey, Morris, Strow, Kristiansen and Pearson

      Creating an additional superior court position.

      The measure was read the second time.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Kline, the rules were suspended, House Bill No. 1112 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Senators Kline and Johnson spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

MOTIONS

On motion of Senator Hewitt, Senators Finkbeiner, McCaslin and Parlette were excused.

On motion of Senator Regala, Senator Kastama was excused.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the final passage of House Bill No. 1112.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of House Bill No. 1112 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 45; Nays, 0; Absent, 2; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Benson, Benton, Berkey, Brandland, Brown, Carrell, Deccio, Delvin, Doumit, Eide, Esser, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Hargrove, Hewitt, Honeyford, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kline, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, Morton, Mulliken, Parlette, Pflug, Poulsen, Prentice, Pridemore, Rasmussen, Regala, Roach, Rockefeller, Schmidt, Sheldon, Shin, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, Weinstein and Zarelli - 45

      Absent: Senators Oke and Schoesler - 2

      Excused: Senators Haugen and McCaslin - 2

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1112, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill was ordered to stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1262, by Representatives Takko, Walsh, Blake and Wallace

      Limiting compensation for part-time judges.

      The measure was read the second time.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Kline, the rules were suspended, House Bill No. 1262 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Senators Kline and Johnson spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the final passage of House Bill No. 1262.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of House Bill No. 1262 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Benson, Benton, Berkey, Brandland, Brown, Carrell, Deccio, Delvin, Doumit, Eide, Esser, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Hargrove, Hewitt, Honeyford, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kline, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, Morton, Mulliken, Oke, Parlette, Pflug, Poulsen, Prentice, Pridemore, Rasmussen, Regala, Roach, Rockefeller, Schmidt, Schoesler, Sheldon, Shin, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, Weinstein and Zarelli - 47

      Excused: Senators Haugen and McCaslin - 2

      HOUSE BILL NO. 1262, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill was ordered to stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1401, by House Committee on Local Government (originally sponsored by Representatives Simpson, Hankins, O'Brien, Ormsby and Chase)

      Requiring certain buildings to add automatic sprinkler systems. Revised for 1st Substitute: Regulating fire safety.

      The measure was read the second time.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Kohl-Welles, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1401 was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Senators Kohl-Welles and Parlette spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

      The President Pro Tempore declared the question before the Senate to be the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1401.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1401 and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 44; Nays, 3; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Benson, Benton, Berkey, Brandland, Brown, Carrell, Deccio, Delvin, Doumit, Eide, Esser, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Hargrove, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kline, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, Morton, Mulliken, Oke, Parlette, Pflug, Poulsen, Prentice, Pridemore, Rasmussen, Regala, Roach, Rockefeller, Schmidt, Schoesler, Sheldon, Shin, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau and Weinstein - 44

      Voting nay: Senators Hewitt, Honeyford and Zarelli - 3

      Excused: Senators Haugen and McCaslin - 2

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1401, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill was ordered to stand as the title of the act.

      The President assumed the chair.

SECOND READING

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1689, by House Committee on Health Care (originally sponsored by Representatives Cody, Moeller, Appleton, Morrell, Clibborn, Green, Kenney, Murray, Schual-Berke and Chase)

      Concerning dental health services.

      The measure was read the second time.

MOTION

      Senator Keiser moved that the following striking amendment by Senator Keiser be adopted:

      Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

      "Sec. 1. RCW 18.32.195 and 1994 sp.s. c 9 s 218 are each amended to read as follows:

      The commission may, without examination, issue a license to persons who possess the qualifications set forth in this section.

      (1) The commission may, upon written request of the dean of the school of dentistry of the University of Washington, issue a license to practice dentistry in this state to persons who have been licensed or otherwise authorized to practice dentistry in another state or country and who have been accepted for employment by the school of dentistry as full-time faculty members. For purposes of this subsection, this means teaching members of the faculty of the school of dentistry of the University of Washington who are so employed on a one hundred percent of work time basis. Such license shall permit the holder thereof to practice dentistry within the confines of the university facilities for a period of one year while he or she is so employed as a full-time faculty member by the school of dentistry of the University of Washington. It shall terminate whenever the holder ceases to be such a full-time faculty member. Such license shall permit the holder thereof to practice dentistry only in connection with his or her duties in employment with the school of dentistry of the University of Washington. This limitation shall be stated on the license.

      (2) The commission may, upon written request of the dean of the school of dentistry of the University of Washington or the director of a dental residency program under RCW 18.32.040, issue a limited license to practice dentistry in this state to university residents in postgraduate dental education or postdoctorate residents in a dental residency program under RCW 18.32.040. The license shall permit the resident dentist to provide dental care only in connection with his or her duties as a university resident or a postdoctorate resident in a program under RCW 18.32.040.

      (3) The commission may condition the granting of a license under this section with terms the commission deems appropriate. All persons licensed under this section shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the commission to the same extent as other members of the dental profession, in accordance with this chapter, and in addition the licensee may be disciplined by the commission after a hearing has been held in accordance with the provisions set forth in this chapter, and determination by the commission that such licensee has violated any of the restrictions set forth in this section.

      (4) Persons applying for licensure pursuant to this section shall pay the application fee determined by the secretary and, in the event the license applied for is issued, a license fee at the rate provided for licenses generally. After review by the commission, licenses issued under this section may be renewed annually if the licensee continues to be employed as a full-time faculty member of the school of dentistry of the University of Washington, or a university resident in postgraduate dental education, or a postdoctorate resident in a dental residency program under RCW 18.32.040, and otherwise meets the requirements of the provisions and conditions deemed appropriate by the commission. Any person who obtains a license pursuant to this section may, without an additional application fee, apply for licensure under this chapter, in which case the applicant shall be subject to examination and the other requirements of this chapter.

      Sec. 2. RCW 18.32.040 and 1994 sp.s. c 9 s 211 are each amended to read as follows:

      The commission shall require that every applicant for a license to practice dentistry shall:

      (1) Present satisfactory evidence of graduation from a dental college, school, or dental department of an institution approved by the commission;

      (2) Submit, for the files of the commission, a recent picture duly identified and attested; and

      (3)(a) Pass an examination prepared or approved by and administered under the direction of the commission. The dentistry licensing examination shall consist of practical and written tests upon such subjects and of such scope as the commission determines. ((The commission may accept, in lieu of all or part of a written examination, a certificate granted by a national or regional testing organization approved by the commission.)) The commission shall set the standards for passing the examination. The secretary shall keep on file the examination papers and records of examination for at least one year. This file shall be open for inspection by the applicant or the applicant's agent unless the disclosure will compromise the examination process as determined by the commission or is exempted from disclosure under RCW 42.17.250 through 42.17.340.

      (b) The commission may accept, in lieu of all or part of the written examination required in (a) of this subsection, a certificate granted by a national or regional testing organization approved by the commission.

      (c) The commission shall accept, in lieu of the practical examination required in (a) of this subsection, proof that an applicant has satisfactorily completed a postdoctoral dental residency program accredited by the commission on dental accreditation of the American dental association and approved by the commission, of one to three year's duration, in a community health clinic that serves predominantly low-income patients or is located in a dental care health professional shortage area in this state, and that includes an outcome assessment evaluation, other than the western regional examining board's clinical examination, assessing the resident's competence to practice dentistry. The commission shall develop criteria, consistent with the standards of the commission on dental accreditation of the American dental association, for community clinics to use when sponsoring students in a residency program under this subsection, including guidelines for the proper supervision of the resident and measuring the resident's competence to practice dentistry.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. If specific funding for the purposes of this act, referencing this act by bill or chapter number, is not provided by June 30, 2005, in the omnibus appropriations act, this act is null and void.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. This act takes effect July 1, 2006."

      Senator Keiser spoke in favor of adoption of the striking amendment.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the striking amendment by Senator Keiser to Substitute House Bill No. 1689.

      The motion by Senator Keiser carried and the striking amendment was adopted by voice vote.

MOTION

      There being no objection, the following title amendment was adopted:

      On page 1, line 1 of the title, after "services;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 18.32.195 and 18.32.040; creating a new section; and providing an effective date."

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Keiser, the rules were suspended, Substitute House Bill No. 1689, as amended by the Senate was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Senator Keiser spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1689, as amended by the Senate.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Substitute House Bill No. 1689, as amended by the Senate and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 47; Nays, 0; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Benson, Benton, Berkey, Brandland, Brown, Carrell, Deccio, Delvin, Doumit, Eide, Esser, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Hargrove, Hewitt, Honeyford, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kline, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, Morton, Mulliken, Oke, Parlette, Pflug, Poulsen, Prentice, Pridemore, Rasmussen, Regala, Roach, Rockefeller, Schmidt, Schoesler, Sheldon, Shin, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Thibaudeau, Weinstein and Zarelli - 47

      Excused: Senators Haugen and McCaslin - 2

      SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1689, as amended by the Senate, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill was ordered to stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1799, by House Committee on Criminal Justice & Corrections (originally sponsored by Representatives B. Sullivan and Upthegrove)

      Concerning park rangers employed by the parks and recreation commission. Revised for 1st Substitute: Creating a task force on public recreational lands and public safety.

      The measure was read the second time.

MOTION

      Senator Jacobsen moved that the following committee striking amendment by the Committee on Natural Resources, Ocean & Recreation be adopted.

      Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

      "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature finds that law enforcement functions at state parks and lands are insufficient to adequately protect the public and our natural resources. Threats to the safety of the visiting public and public lands are not necessarily confined to the boundaries of state parks and lands. State law does not expressly grant or deny park rangers the authority to engage in law enforcement activities outside of park and land boundaries. Further, the legislature finds that, in many areas of the state, other state or local law enforcement officers are either too far away or understaffed to provide adequate support to on-site law enforcement professionals in emergency situations. The legislature finds that a comprehensive review of the role and responsibilities of law enforcement professionals within and around state parks and lands is necessary to ensure the value of state parks and natural resources is not diminished.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. (1) The task force on state public recreational lands and public safety is created. The task force shall be comprised of twelve members appointed as follows:

      (a) Two members of the house of representatives, one from each major caucus, to be appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives;

      (b) Two members of the senate, one from each major caucus, to be appointed by the president of the senate;

      (c) The commissioner of public lands or his or her designee;

      (d) The chair of the Washington state parks and recreation commission or his or her designee;

      (e) The chair of the Washington fish and wildlife commission or his or her designee;

      (f) Five members, to be appointed jointly by the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the senate, from nominations submitted by the following organizations:

      (i) One representative of the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs;

      (ii) One representative of the Washington state council of police and sheriffs;

      (iii) One representative of the Washington association of prosecuting attorneys;

      (iv) One representative park ranger who is an active member of the recognized employee bargaining unit and who is employed by the Washington state parks and recreation commission; and

      (v) One recognized employee representative of enforcement officers with the department of natural resources.

      (2) The task force members shall elect a chair and determine its operating procedures. The task force shall be jointly staffed by the office of program research and senate committee services as determined by their respective staff directors.

      (a) Legislative members of the task force shall be reimbursed for travel expenses in accordance with RCW 44.04.120. Nonlegislative members, except those representing an employer or organization, are entitled to be reimbursed for travel expenses in accordance with RCW 43.03.050 and 43.03.060.

      (b) The compensable travel expenses as provided in (a) of this subsection shall be paid jointly by the senate and the house of representatives.

      (3) This section expires January 1, 2006.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. The task force shall conduct a comprehensive review of law enforcement issues in and around state parks and lands, including but not limited to:

      (1) The extent to which illegal activity in and around state parks and lands threatens public safety and natural resources; and

      (2) The ability of the current state and local law enforcement to respond to illegal activity on or near public recreational lands.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. By December 15, 2005, the task force shall provide a final report of its recommendations, including any draft legislation to implement the recommendations. The report shall be submitted to the chief clerk of the house of representatives and the secretary of the senate."

      Senator Jacobsen spoke in favor of adoption of the committee striking amendment.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the committee striking amendment by the Committee on Natural Resources, Ocean & Recreation to Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1799.

      The motion by Senator Jacobsen carried and the committee striking amendment was adopted by voice vote.

MOTION

      There being no objection, the following title amendment was adopted:

      On page 1, line 2 of the title, after "commission;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "creating new sections; and providing an expiration date."

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Johnson, the rules were suspended, Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1799, as amended by the Senate was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Senators Jacobsen and Oke spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1799, as amended by the Senate.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1799, as amended by the Senate and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 43; Nays, 4; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Benson, Berkey, Brandland, Brown, Carrell, Deccio, Delvin, Doumit, Eide, Esser, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Hargrove, Honeyford, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kline, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, Morton, Oke, Parlette, Pflug, Poulsen, Prentice, Pridemore, Rasmussen, Regala, Roach, Rockefeller, Schmidt, Schoesler, Sheldon, Shin, Spanel, Swecker, Thibaudeau, Weinstein and Zarelli - 43

      Voting nay: Senators Benton, Hewitt, Mulliken and Stevens - 4

      Excused: Senators Haugen and McCaslin - 2

      ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL NO. 1799, as amended by the Senate, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill was ordered to stand as the title of the act.

SECOND READING

      ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO. 1848, by Representatives Springer, Tom, Lantz, Priest, Hunter, Jarrett, Clibborn, Serben, Fromhold, Rodne, Williams, Flannigan, Kessler, O'Brien and Simpson

      Addressing construction defect disputes involving multiunit residential buildings.

      The measure was read the second time.

MOTION

      Senator Kline moved that the following committee striking amendment by the Committee on Judiciary be adopted.

      Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:

      "NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. APPLICABILITY. (1)(a) Sections 2 through 10 of this act apply to any multiunit residential building for which the permit for construction or rehabilitative construction of such building was issued on or after the effective date of this act.

      (b) Sections 2 and 10 of this act apply to conversion condominiums as defined in RCW 64.34.020, provided that section 10 of this act shall not apply to a condominium conversion for which a public offering statement had been delivered pursuant to chapter 64.34 RCW prior to the effective date of this act.

      (2) Sections 2 and 11 through 18 of this act apply to any action that alleges breach of an implied or express warranty under chapter 64.34 RCW or that seeks relief that could be awarded for such breach, regardless of the legal theory pled, except that sections 11 through 18 of this act shall not apply to:

      (a) Actions filed or served prior to the effective date of this act;

      (b) Actions for which a notice of claim was served pursuant to chapter 64.50 RCW prior to the effective date of this act;

      (c) Actions asserting any claim regarding a building that is not a multiunit residential building;

      (d) Actions asserting any claim regarding a multiunit residential building that was permitted on or after the effective date of this act unless the letter required by section 7 of this act has been submitted to the appropriate building department or the requirements of section 10 of this act have been satisfied.

      (3) Other than the requirements imposed by sections 2 through 10 of this act, nothing in this chapter amends or modifies the provisions of RCW 64.34.050.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. DEFINITIONS. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in RCW 64.34.020 and in this section apply throughout this chapter.

      (1) "Attached dwelling unit" means any dwelling unit that is attached to another dwelling unit by a wall, floor, or ceiling that separates heated living spaces. A garage is not a heated living space.

      (2) "Building enclosure" means that part of any building, above or below grade, that physically separates the outside or exterior environment from interior environments and which weatherproofs, waterproofs, or otherwise protects the building or its components from water or moisture intrusion. Interior environments consist of both heated and unheated enclosed spaces. The building enclosure includes, but is not limited to, that portion of roofs, walls, balcony support columns, decks, windows, doors, vents, and other penetrations through exterior walls, which waterproof, weatherproof, or otherwise protect the building or its components from water or moisture intrusion.

      (3) "Building enclosure design documents" means plans, details, and specifications for the building enclosure that have been stamped by a licensed engineer or architect. The building enclosure design documents shall include details and specifications that are appropriate for the building in the professional judgment of the architect or engineer which prepared the same to waterproof, weatherproof, and otherwise protect the building or its components from water or moisture intrusion, including details of flashing, intersections at roof, eaves or parapets, means of drainage, water-resistive membrane, and details around openings.

      (4) "Developer" means:

      (a) With respect to a condominium or a conversion condominium, the declarant; and

      (b) With respect to all other buildings, an individual, group of individuals, partnership, corporation, association, municipal corporation, state agency, or other entity or person that obtains a building permit for the construction or rehabilitative reconstruction of a multiunit residential building. If a permit is obtained by service providers such as architects, contractors, and consultants who obtain permits for others as part of services rendered for a fee, the person for whom the permit is obtained shall be the developer, not the service provider.

      (5) "Dwelling unit" has the meaning given to that phrase or similar phrases in the ordinances of the jurisdiction issuing the permit for construction of the building enclosure but if such ordinances do not provide a definition, then "dwelling unit" means a residence containing living, cooking, sleeping, and sanitary facilities.

      (6) "Multiunit residential building" means:

      (a) A building containing more than two attached dwelling units, including a building containing nonresidential units if the building also contains more than two attached dwelling units, but excluding the following classes of buildings:

      (i) Hotels and motels;

      (ii) Dormitories;

      (iii) Care facilities;

      (iv) Floating homes;

      (v) A building that contains attached dwelling units that are each located on a single platted lot, except as provided in (b) of this subsection.

      (vi) A building in which all of the dwelling units are held under one ownership and is subject to a recorded irrevocable sale prohibition covenant.

      (b) If the developer submits to the appropriate building department when applying for the building permit described in section 3 of this act a statement that the developer elects to treat the improvement for which a permit is sought as a multiunit residential building for all purposes under this chapter, then "multiunit residential building" also means the following buildings for which such election has been made:

      (i) A building containing only two attached dwelling units;

      (ii) A building that does not contain attached dwelling units; and

      (iii) Any building that contains attached dwelling units each of which is located on a single platted lot.

      (7) "Party unit owner" means a unit owner who is a named party to an action subject to this chapter and does not include any unit owners whose involvement with the action stems solely from their membership in the association.

      (8) "Qualified building inspector" means a person satisfying the requirements of section 5 of this act.

      (9) "Rehabilitative construction" means construction work on the building enclosure of a multiunit residential building if the cost of such construction work is more than five percent of the assessed value of the building.

      (10) "Sale prohibition covenant" means a recorded covenant that prohibits the sale or other disposition of individual dwelling units as or as part of a condominium for five years or more from the date of first occupancy except as otherwise provided in section 10 of this act, a certified copy of which the developer shall submit to the appropriate building department; provided such covenant shall not apply to sales or dispositions listed in RCW 64.34.400(2). The covenant must be recorded in the county in which the building is located and must be in substantially the following form:

      This covenant has been recorded in the real property records of . . . . . . County, Washington, in satisfaction of the requirements of sections 2 through 10 of this act. The undersigned is the owner of the property described on Exhibit A (the "Property"). Until termination of this covenant, no dwelling unit in or on the Property may be sold as a condominium unit except for sales listed in RCW 64.34.400(2).

This covenant terminates on the earlier of either: (a) Compliance with the requirements of section 10 of this act, as certified by the owner of the Property in a recorded supplement hereto; or (b) the fifth anniversary of the date of first occupancy of a dwelling unit as certified by the Owner in a recorded supplement hereto.

All title insurance companies and persons acquiring an interest in the Property may rely on the forgoing certifications without further inquiry in issuing any policy of title insurance or in acquiring an interest in the Property.

      (11) "Stamped" means bearing the stamp and signature of the responsible licensed architect or engineer on the title page, and on every sheet of the documents, drawings, or specifications, including modifications to the documents, drawings, and specifications that become part of change orders or addenda to alter those documents, drawings, or specifications.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. DESIGN DOCUMENTS. (1) Any person applying for a building permit for construction of a multiunit residential building or rehabilitative construction shall submit building enclosure design documents to the appropriate building department prior to the start of construction or rehabilitative construction of the building enclosure. If construction work on a building enclosure is not rehabilitative construction because the cost thereof is not more than five percent of the assessed value of the building, then the person applying for a building permit shall submit to the building department a letter so certifying. Any changes to the building enclosure design documents that alter the manner in which the building or its components is waterproofed, weatherproofed, and otherwise protected from water or moisture intrusion shall be stamped by the architect or engineer and shall be provided to the building department and to the person conducting the course of construction inspection in a timely manner to permit such person to inspect for compliance therewith, and may be provided through individual updates, cumulative updates, or as-built updates.

      (2) The building department shall not issue a building permit for construction of the building enclosure of a multiunit residential building or for rehabilitative construction unless the building enclosure design documents contain a stamped statement by the person stamping the building enclosure design documents in substantially the following form: "The undersigned has provided building enclosure documents that in my professional judgment are appropriate to satisfy the requirements of sections 1 through 10 of this act."

      (3) The building department is not charged with determining whether the building enclosure design documents are adequate or appropriate to satisfy the requirements of sections 1 through 10 of this act. Nothing in sections 1 through 10 of this act requires a building department to review, approve, or disapprove enclosure design documents.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. INSPECTIONS. All multiunit residential buildings shall have the building enclosure inspected by a qualified inspector during the course of initial construction and during rehabilitative construction.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. INSPECTORS--QUALIFICATIONS--INDEPENDENCE. (1) A qualified building enclosure inspector:

      (a) Must be a person with substantial and verifiable training and experience in building enclosure design and construction;

      (b) Shall be free from improper interference or influence relating to the inspections; and

      (c) May not be an employee, officer, or director of, nor have any pecuniary interest in, the declarant, developer, association, or any party providing services or materials for the project, or any of their respective affiliates, except that the qualified inspector may be the architect or engineer who approved the building enclosure design documents or the architect or engineer of record. The qualified inspector may, but is not required to, assist with the preparation of such design documents.

      (2) Nothing in this section alters requirements for licensure of any architect, engineer, or other professional, or alters the jurisdiction, authority, or scope of practice of architects, engineers, other professionals, or general contractors.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. SCOPE OF INSPECTION. (1) Any inspection required by this chapter shall include, at a minimum, the following:

      (a) Water penetration resistance testing of a representative sample of windows and window installations. Such tests shall be conducted according to industry standards. Where appropriate, tests shall be conducted with an induced air pressure difference across the window and window installation. Additional testing is not required if the same assembly has previously been tested in situ within the previous two years in the project under construction by the builder, by another member of the construction team such as an architect or engineer, or by an independent testing laboratory; and

      (b) An independent periodic review of the building enclosure during the course of construction or rehabilitative construction to ascertain whether the multiunit residential building has been constructed, or the rehabilitative construction has been performed, in substantial compliance with the building enclosure design documents.

      (2) Subsection (1)(a) of this section shall not apply to rehabilitative construction if the windows and adjacent cladding are not altered in the rehabilitative construction.

      (3) "Project" means one or more parcels of land in a single ownership, which are under development pursuant to a single land use approval or building permit, where window installation is performed by the owner with its own forces, or by the same general contractor, or, if the owner is contracting directly with trade contractors, is performed by the same trade contractor.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. CERTIFICATION--CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. Upon completion of an inspection required by this chapter, the qualified inspector shall prepare and submit to the appropriate building department a signed letter certifying that the building enclosure has been inspected during the course of construction or rehabilitative construction and that it has been constructed or reconstructed in substantial compliance with the building enclosure design documents, as updated pursuant to section 3 of this act. The building department shall not issue a final certificate of occupancy or other equivalent final acceptance until the letter required by this section has been submitted. The building department is not charged with and has no responsibility for determining whether the building enclosure inspection is adequate or appropriate to satisfy the requirements of this chapter.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. INSPECTOR, ARCHITECT, AND ENGINEER LIABILITY. (1) Nothing in this act is intended to, or does:

      (a) Create a private right of action against any inspector, architect, or engineer based upon compliance or noncompliance with its provisions; or

      (b) Create any independent basis for liability against an inspector, architect, or engineer.

      (2) The qualified inspector, architect, or engineer and the developer that retained the inspector, architect, or engineer may contractually agree to the amount of their liability to the developer.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. NO EVIDENTIARY PRESUMPTION--ADMISSIBILITY. A qualified inspector's report or testimony regarding an inspection conducted pursuant to this chapter is not entitled to any evidentiary presumption in any arbitration or court proceeding. Nothing in this chapter restricts the admissibility of such a report or testimony, and questions of the admissibility of such a report or testimony shall be determined under the rules of evidence.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. NO SALE OF CONDOMINIUM UNIT ABSENT COMPLIANCE. (1) Except for sales or other dispositions listed in RCW 64.34.400(2), no declarant may convey a condominium unit that may be occupied for residential use in a multiunit residential building without first complying with the requirements of sections 1 through 9 of this act unless the building enclosure of the building in which such unit is included is inspected by a qualified building enclosure inspector, and:

      (a) The inspection includes such intrusive or other testing, such as the removal of siding or other building enclosure materials, that the inspector believes, in his or her professional judgment, is necessary to ascertain the manner in which the building enclosure was constructed;

      (b) The inspection evaluates, to the extent reasonably ascertainable and in the professional judgment of the inspector, the present condition of the building enclosure including whether such condition has adversely affected or will adversely affect the performance of the building enclosure to waterproof, weatherproof, or otherwise protect the building or its components from water or moisture intrusion. "Adversely affect" has the same meaning as provided in RCW 64.34.445(7);

      (c) The inspection report includes recommendations for repairs to the building enclosure that, in the professional judgment of the qualified building inspector, are necessary to: (i) Repair a design or construction defect in the building enclosure that results in the failure of the building enclosure to perform its intended function and allows unintended water penetration not caused by flooding; and (ii) repair damage caused by such a defect that has an adverse effect as provided in RCW 64.34.445(7);

      (d) With respect to a building that would be a multiunit residential building but for the recording of a sale prohibition covenant and unless more than five years have elapsed since the date such covenant was recorded, all repairs to the building enclosure recommended pursuant to (c) of this subsection have been made; and

      (e) The declarant provides as part of the public offering statement, consistent with RCW 64.34.410 (1)(nn) and (2) and 64.34.415(1)(b), an inspection and repair report signed by the qualified building enclosure inspector that identifies:

      (i) The extent of the inspection performed pursuant to this section;

      (ii) The information obtained as a result of that inspection; and

      (iii) The manner in which any repairs required by this section were performed, the scope of those repairs, and the names of the persons performing those repairs.

      (2) Failure to deliver the inspection and repair report in violation of this section constitutes a failure to deliver a public offering statement for purposes of chapter 64.34 RCW.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. ARBITRATION--ELECTION--NUMBER OF ARBITRATORS--QUALIFICATIONS--TRIAL DE NOVO. (1) If the declarant, an association, or a party unit owner demands an arbitration by filing such demand with the court not less than thirty and not more than ninety days after filing or service of the complaint, whichever is later, the parties shall participate in a private arbitration hearing. The declarant, the association, and the party unit owner do not have the right to compel arbitration without giving timely notice in compliance with this subsection. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitration hearing shall commence no more than fourteen months from the later of the filing or service of the complaint.

      (2) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, claims that in aggregate are for less than one million dollars shall be heard by a single arbitrator and all other claims shall be heard by three arbitrators. As used in this chapter, arbitrator also means arbitrators where applicable.

      (3) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the court shall appoint the arbitrator, who shall be a current or former attorney with experience as an attorney, judge, arbitrator, or mediator in construction defect disputes involving the application of Washington law.

      (4) Upon conclusion of the arbitration hearing, the arbitrator shall file the decision and award with the clerk of the superior court, together with proof of service thereof on the parties. Within twenty days after the filing of the decision and award, any aggrieved party may file with the clerk a written notice of appeal and demand for a trial de novo in the superior court on all claims between the appealing party and an adverse party. As used in this section, "adverse party" means the party who either directly asserted or defended claims against the appealing party. The demand shall identify the adverse party or parties and all claims between those parties shall be included in the trial de novo. The right to a trial de novo includes the right to a jury, if demanded. The court shall give priority to the trial date for the trial de novo.

      (5) If the judgment for damages, not including awards of fees and costs, in the trial de novo is not more favorable to the appealing party than the damages awarded by the arbitrator, not including awards of fees and costs, the appealing party shall pay the nonappealing adverse party's costs and fees incurred after the filing of the appeal, including reasonable attorneys' fees so incurred.

      (6) If the judgment for damages, not including awards of fees and costs, in the trial de novo is more favorable to the appealing party than the damages awarded by the arbitrator, not including awards of fees and costs, then the court may award costs and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred after the filing of the request for trial de novo in accordance with applicable law; provided if such a judgment is not more favorable to the appealing party than the most recent offer of judgment, if any, made pursuant to section 17 of this act, the court shall not make an award of fees and costs to the appealing party.

      (7) If a party is entitled to an award with respect to the same fees and costs pursuant to this section and section 17 of this act, then the party shall only receive an award of fees and costs as provided in and limited by section 17 of this act. Any award of fees and costs pursuant to subsections (5) or (6) of this section is subject to review in the event of any appeal thereof otherwise permitted by applicable law or court rule.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. CASE SCHEDULE PLAN. (1) Not less than sixty days after the later of filing or service of the complaint, the parties shall confer to create a proposed case schedule plan for submission to the court that includes the following deadlines:

      (a) Selection of a mediator;

      (b) Commencement of the mandatory mediation and submission of mediation materials required by this chapter;

      (c) Selection of the arbitrator by the parties, where applicable;

      (d) Joinder of additional parties in the action;

      (e) Completion of each party's investigation;

      (f) Disclosure of each party's proposed repair plan;

      (g) Disclosure of each party's estimated costs of repair;

      (h) Meeting of parties and experts to confer in accordance with section 13 of this act; and

      (i) Disclosure of each party's settlement demand or response.

      (2) If the parties agree upon a proposed case schedule plan, they shall move the court for the entry of the proposed case schedule plan. If the parties cannot agree, either party may move the court for entry of a case schedule plan that includes the above deadlines.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 13. MANDATORY MEDIATION. (1) The parties to an action subject to this act shall engage in mediation. Unless the parties agree otherwise, the mediation required by this section shall commence within seven months of the later of the filing or service of the complaint. If the parties cannot agree upon a mediator, the court shall appoint a mediator.

      (2) Prior to the mediation required by this section, the parties and their experts shall meet and confer in good faith to attempt to resolve or narrow the scope of the disputed issues, including issues related to the parties' repair plans.

      (3) Prior to the mandatory mediation, the parties or their attorneys shall file and serve a declaration that:

      (a) A decision maker with authority to settle will be available for the duration of the mandatory mediation; and

      (b) The decision maker has been provided with and has reviewed the mediation materials provided by the party to which the decision maker is affiliated as well as the materials submitted by the opposing parties.

      (4) Completion of the mediation required by this section occurs upon written notice of termination by any party. The provisions of section 17 of this act shall not apply to any later mediation conducted following such notice.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 14. NEUTRAL EXPERT. (1) If, after meeting and conferring as required by section 13(2) of this act, disputed issues remain, a party may file a motion with the court, or arbitrator if an arbitrator has been appointed, requesting the appointment of a neutral expert to address any or all of the disputed issues. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties or upon a showing of exceptional circumstances, including a material adverse change in a party's litigation risks due to a change in allegations, claims, or defenses by an adverse party following the appointment of the neutral expert, any such motion shall be filed no later than sixty days after the first day of the meeting required by section 13(2) of this act. Upon such a request, the court or arbitrator shall decide whether or not to appoint a neutral expert or experts. A party may only request more than one neutral expert if the particular expertise of the additional neutral expert or experts is necessary to address disputed issues.

      (2) The neutral expert shall be a licensed architect or engineer, or any other person, with substantial experience relevant to the issue or issues in dispute. The neutral expert shall not have been employed as an expert by a party to the present action within three years before the commencement of the present action, unless the parties agree otherwise.

      (3) All parties shall be given an opportunity to recommend neutral experts to the court or arbitrator and shall have input regarding the appointment of a neutral expert.

      (4) Unless the parties agree otherwise on the following matters, the court, or arbitrator if then appointed, shall determine:

      (a) Who shall serve as the neutral expert;

      (b) Subject to the requirements of this section, the scope of the neutral expert's duties;

      (c) The number and timing of inspections of the property;

      (d) Coordination of inspection activities with the parties' experts;

      (e) The neutral expert's access to the work product of the parties' experts;

      (f) The product to be prepared by the neutral expert;

      (g) Whether the neutral expert may participate personally in the mediation required by section 13 of this act; and

      (h) Other matters relevant to the neutral expert's assignment.

      (5) Unless the parties agree otherwise, the neutral expert shall not make findings or render opinions regarding the amount of damages to be awarded, or the cost of repairs, or absent exceptional circumstances any matters that are not in dispute as determined in the meeting described in section 13(2) of this act or otherwise.

      (6) A party may, by motion to the court, or to the arbitrator if then appointed, object to the individual appointed to serve as the neutral expert and to determinations regarding the neutral expert's assignment.

      (7) The neutral expert shall have no liability to the parties for the performance of his or her duties as the neutral expert.

      (8) Except as otherwise agreed by the parties, the parties have a right to review and comment on the neutral expert's report before it is made final.

      (9) A neutral expert's report or testimony is not entitled to any evidentiary presumption in any arbitration or court proceeding. Nothing in this act restricts the admissibility of such a report or testimony, provided it is within the scope of the neutral expert's assigned duties, and questions of the admissibility of such a report or testimony shall be determined under the rules of evidence.

      (10) The court, or arbitrator if then appointed, shall determine the significance of the neutral expert's report and testimony with respect to parties joined after the neutral expert's appointment and shall determine whether additional neutral experts should be appointed or other measures should be taken to protect such joined parties from undue prejudice.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 15. PAYMENT OF ARBITRATORS, MEDIATORS, AND NEUTRAL EXPERTS. (1) Where the building permit that authorized commencement of construction of a building was issued on or after the effective date of this act:

      (a)(i) If the action is referred to arbitration under section 11 of this act, the party who demands arbitration shall advance the fees of any arbitrator and any mediator appointed under section 13 of this act; and

      (ii) A party who requests the appointment of a neutral expert pursuant to section 14 of this act shall advance any appointed neutral expert's fees incurred up to the issuance of a final report.

      (b) If the action has not been referred to arbitration, the court shall determine liability for the fees of any mediator appointed under section 13 of this act, unless the parties agree otherwise.

      (c) Ultimate liability for any fees or costs advanced pursuant to this subsection (1) is subject to the fee- and cost-shifting provisions of section 17 of this act.

      (2) Where the building permit that authorized commencement of construction of a building was issued before the effective date of this act:

      (a)(i) If the action is referred to arbitration under section 11 of this act, the party who demands arbitration is liable for and shall pay the fees of any appointed arbitrator and any mediator appointed under section 13 of this act; and

      (ii) A party who requests the appointment of a neutral expert pursuant to section 14 of this act is liable for and shall pay any appointed neutral expert's fees incurred up to the issuance of a final report.

      (b) If the action has not been referred to arbitration, the court shall determine liability for the fees of any mediator appointed under section 13 of this act, unless the parties agree otherwise.

      (c) Fees and costs paid under this subsection (2) are not subject to the fee- and cost-shifting provisions of section 17 of this act.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 16. SUBCONTRACTORS. Upon the demand of a party to an arbitration demanded under section 11 of this act, any subcontractor or supplier against whom such party has a legal claim and whose work or performance on the building in question becomes an issue in the arbitration may be joined in and become a party to the arbitration. However, joinder of such parties shall not be allowed if such joinder would require the arbitration hearing date to be continued beyond the date established pursuant to section 11 of this act, unless the existing parties to the arbitration agree otherwise. Nothing in sections 2 through 10 of this act shall be construed to release, modify, or otherwise alleviate the liabilities or responsibilities that any party may have towards any other party, contractor, or subcontractor.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 17. OFFERS OF JUDGMENT--COSTS AND FEES. (1) On or before the sixtieth day following completion of the mediation pursuant to section 13(4) of this act, the declarant, association, or party unit owner may serve on an adverse party an offer to allow judgment to be entered. The offer of judgment shall specify the amount of damages, not including costs or fees, that the declarant, association, or party unit owner is offering to pay or receive. A declarant's offer shall also include its commitment to pay costs and fees that may be awarded as provided in this section. The declarant, association, or party unit owner may make more than one offer of judgment so long as each offer is timely made. Each subsequent offer supersedes and replaces the previous offer. Any offer not accepted within twenty-one days of the service of that offer is deemed rejected and withdrawn and evidence thereof is not admissible and may not be provided to the court or arbitrator except in a proceeding to determine costs and fees or as part of the motion identified in subsection (2) of this section.

      (2) A declarant's offer must include a demonstration of ability to pay damages, costs, and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees, within thirty days of acceptance of the offer of judgment. The demonstration of ability to pay shall include a sworn statement signed by the declarant, the attorney representing the declarant, and, if any insurance proceeds will be used to fund any portion of the offer, an authorized representative of the insurance company. If the association or party unit owner disputes the adequacy of the declarant's demonstration of ability to pay, the association or party unit owner may file a motion with the court requesting a ruling on the adequacy of the declarant's demonstration of ability to pay. Upon filing of such motion, the deadline for a response to the offer shall be tolled from the date the motion is filed until the court has ruled.

      (3) An association or party unit owner that accepts the declarant's offer of judgment shall be deemed the prevailing party and, in addition to recovery of the amount of the offer, shall be entitled to a costs and fees award, including reasonable attorneys' fees, in an amount to be determined by the court in accordance with applicable law.

      (4) If the amount of the final nonappealable or nonappealed judgment, exclusive of costs or fees, is not more favorable to the offeree than the offer of judgment, then the offeror is deemed the prevailing party for purposes of this section only and is entitled to an award of costs and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred after the date the last offer of judgment was rejected and through the date of entry of a final nonappealable or nonappealed judgment, in an amount to be determined by the court in accordance with applicable law. The nonprevailing party shall not be entitled to receive any award of costs and fees.

      (5) If the final nonappealable or nonappealed judgment on damages, not including costs or fees, is more favorable to the offeree than the last offer of judgment, then the court shall determine which party is the prevailing party and shall determine the amount of the costs and fees award, including reasonable attorneys' fees, in accordance with applicable law.

      (6) Notwithstanding any other provision in this section, with respect to claims brought by an association or unit owner, the liability for declarant's costs and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees, shall:

      (a) With respect to claims brought by an association, not exceed five percent of the assessed value of the condominium as a whole, which is determined by the aggregate tax-assessed value of all units at the time of the award; and

      (b) With respect to claims brought by a party unit owner, not exceed five percent of the assessed value of the unit at the time of the award.

      Sec. 18. RCW 64.34.415 and 1992 c 220 s 22 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) The public offering statement of a conversion condominium shall contain, in addition to the information required by RCW 64.34.410:

      (a) Either a copy of a report prepared by an independent, licensed architect or engineer, or a statement by the declarant based on such report, which report or statement describes, to the extent reasonably ascertainable, the present condition of all structural components and mechanical and electrical installations material to the use and enjoyment of the condominium;

      (b) A copy of the inspection and repair report prepared by an independent, licensed architect, engineer, or qualified building inspector in accordance with the requirements of section 10 of this act;

      (c) A statement by the declarant of the expected useful life of each item reported on in (a) of this subsection or a statement that no representations are made in that regard; and

      (((c))) (d) A list of any outstanding notices of uncured violations of building code or other municipal regulations, together with the estimated cost of curing those violations. Unless the purchaser waives in writing the curing of specific violations, the extent to which the declarant will cure such violations prior to the closing of the sale of a unit in the condominium shall be included.

      (2) This section applies only to condominiums containing units that may be occupied for residential use.

      Sec. 19. RCW 64.34.410 and 2004 c 201 s 11 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) A public offering statement shall contain the following information:

      (a) The name and address of the condominium;

      (b) The name and address of the declarant;

      (c) The name and address of the management company, if any;

      (d) The relationship of the management company to the declarant, if any;

      (e) A list of up to the five most recent condominium projects completed by the declarant or an affiliate of the declarant within the past five years, including the names of the condominiums, their addresses, and the number of existing units in each. For the purpose of this section, a condominium is "completed" when any one unit therein has been rented or sold;

      (f) The nature of the interest being offered for sale;

      (g) A brief description of the permitted uses and use restrictions pertaining to the units and the common elements;

      (h) A brief description of the restrictions, if any, on the renting or leasing of units by the declarant or other unit owners, together with the rights, if any, of the declarant to rent or lease at least a majority of units;

      (i) The number of existing units in the condominium and the maximum number of units that may be added to the condominium;

      (j) A list of the principal common amenities in the condominium which materially affect the value of the condominium and those that will or may be added to the condominium;

      (k) A list of the limited common elements assigned to the units being offered for sale;

      (l) The identification of any real property not in the condominium, the owner of which has access to any of the common elements, and a description of the terms of such access;

      (m) The identification of any real property not in the condominium to which unit owners have access and a description of the terms of such access;

      (n) The status of construction of the units and common elements, including estimated dates of completion if not completed;

      (o) The estimated current common expense liability for the units being offered;

      (p) An estimate of any payment with respect to the common expense liability for the units being offered which will be due at closing;

      (q) The estimated current amount and purpose of any fees not included in the common expenses and charged by the declarant or the association for the use of any of the common elements;

      (r) Any assessments which have been agreed to or are known to the declarant and which, if not paid, may constitute a lien against any units or common elements in favor of any governmental agency;

      (s) The identification of any parts of the condominium, other than the units, which any individual owner will have the responsibility for maintaining;

      (t) If the condominium involves a conversion condominium, the information required by RCW 64.34.415;

      (u) Whether timesharing is restricted or prohibited, and if restricted, a general description of such restrictions;

      (v) A list of all development rights reserved to the declarant and all special declarant rights reserved to the declarant, together with the dates such rights must terminate, and a copy of or reference by recording number to any recorded transfer of a special declarant right;

      (w) A description of any material differences in terms of furnishings, fixtures, finishes, and equipment between any model unit available to the purchaser at the time the agreement for sale is executed and the unit being offered;

      (x) Any liens on real property to be conveyed to the association required to be disclosed pursuant to RCW 64.34.435(2)(b);

      (y) A list of any physical hazards known to the declarant which particularly affect the condominium or the immediate vicinity in which the condominium is located and which are not readily ascertainable by the purchaser;

      (z) A brief description of any construction warranties to be provided to the purchaser;

      (aa) Any building code violation citations received by the declarant in connection with the condominium which have not been corrected;

      (bb) A statement of any unsatisfied judgments or pending suits against the association, a statement of the status of any pending suits material to the condominium of which the declarant has actual knowledge, and a statement of any litigation brought by an owners' association, unit owner, or governmental entity in which the declarant or any affiliate of the declarant has been a defendant, arising out of the construction, sale, or administration of any condominium within the previous five years, together with the results thereof, if known;

      (cc) Any rights of first refusal to lease or purchase any unit or any of the common elements;

      (dd) The extent to which the insurance provided by the association covers furnishings, fixtures, and equipment located in the unit;

      (ee) A notice which describes a purchaser's right to cancel the purchase agreement or extend the closing under RCW 64.34.420, including applicable time frames and procedures;

      (ff) Any reports or statements required by RCW 64.34.415 or 64.34.440(6)(a). RCW 64.34.415 shall apply to the public offering statement of a condominium in connection with which a final certificate of occupancy was issued more than sixty calendar months prior to the preparation of the public offering statement whether or not the condominium is a conversion condominium as defined in RCW 64.34.020(10);

      (gg) A list of the documents which the prospective purchaser is entitled to receive from the declarant before the rescission period commences;

      (hh) A notice which states: A purchaser may not rely on any representation or express warranty unless it is contained in the public offering statement or made in writing signed by the declarant or by any person identified in the public offering statement as the declarant's agent;

      (ii) A notice which states: This public offering statement is only a summary of some of the significant aspects of purchasing a unit in this condominium and the condominium documents are complex, contain other important information, and create binding legal obligations. You should consider seeking the assistance of legal counsel;

      (jj) Any other information and cross-references which the declarant believes will be helpful in describing the condominium to the recipients of the public offering statement, all of which may be included or not included at the option of the declarant;

      (kk) A notice that addresses compliance or noncompliance with the housing for older persons act of 1995, P.L. 104-76, as enacted on December 28, 1995;

      (ll) A notice that is substantially in the form required by RCW 64.50.050; ((and))

      (mm) A statement, as required by RCW 64.35.210, as to whether the units or common elements of the condominium are covered by a qualified warranty, and a history of claims under any such warranty; and

      (nn) A statement that the building enclosure has been designed and inspected as required by sections 2 through 10 of this act, and, if required, repaired in accordance with the requirements of section 10 of this act.

      (2) The public offering statement shall include copies of each of the following documents: The declaration, the survey map and plans, the articles of incorporation of the association, bylaws of the association, rules and regulations, if any, current or proposed budget for the association, ((and)) the balance sheet of the association current within ninety days if assessments have been collected for ninety days or more, and the inspection and repair report or reports prepared in accordance with the requirements of section 10 of this act.

      If any of the foregoing documents listed in this subsection are not available because they have not been executed, adopted, or recorded, drafts of such documents shall be provided with the public offering statement, and, before closing the sale of a unit, the purchaser shall be given copies of any material changes between the draft of the proposed documents and the final documents.

      (3) The disclosures required by subsection (1)(g), (k), (s), (u), (v), and (cc) of this section shall also contain a reference to specific sections in the condominium documents which further explain the information disclosed.

      (4) The disclosures required by subsection (1)(ee), (hh), (ii), and (ll) of this section shall be located at the top of the first page of the public offering statement and be typed or printed in ten-point bold face type size.

      (5) A declarant shall promptly amend the public offering statement to reflect any material change in the information required by this section.

      Sec. 20. RCW 64.34.100 and 2004 c 201 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:

      (1) The remedies provided by this chapter shall be liberally administered to the end that the aggrieved party is put in as good a position as if the other party had fully performed. However, consequential, special, or punitive damages may not be awarded except as specifically provided in this chapter or by other rule of law.

      (2) Except as otherwise provided in sections 11 through 17 of this act or chapter 64.35 RCW, any right or obligation declared by this chapter is enforceable by judicial proceeding. The arbitration proceedings provided for in sections 11 through 17 of this act shall be considered judicial proceedings for the purposes of this chapter.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 21. A new section is added to Article 1 of chapter 64.34 RCW to read as follows:

      Chapter 64.-- RCW (sections 1 through 17 of this act) includes requirements for: The inspection of the building enclosures of multiunit residential buildings, as defined in section 2 of this act, which includes condominiums and conversion condominiums; for provision of inspection and repair reports; and for the resolution of implied or express warranty disputes under chapter 64.34 RCW.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 22. CAPTIONS. Captions used in this act are not any part of the law.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 23. Sections 1 through 17 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 64 RCW.

      NEW SECTION. Sec. 24. EFFECTIVE DATE. This act takes effect August 1, 2005."

      Senators Kline and Johnson spoke in favor of adoption of the committee striking amendment.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the adoption of the committee striking amendment by the Committee on Judiciary to Engrossed House Bill No. 1848.

      The motion by Senator Kline carried and the committee striking amendment was adopted by voice vote.

MOTION

      There being no objection, the following title amendment was adopted:

      On page 1, line 2 of the title, after "buildings;" strike the remainder of the title and insert "amending RCW 64.34.415, 64.34.410, and 64.34.100; adding a new section to chapter 64.34 RCW; adding a new chapter to Title 64 RCW; creating a new section; and providing an effective date."

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Kline, the rules were suspended, Engrossed House Bill No. 1848, as amended by the Senate was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

      Senator Kline spoke in favor of passage of the bill.

      The President declared the question before the Senate to be the final passage of Engrossed House Bill No. 1848, as amended by the Senate.

ROLL CALL

      The Secretary called the roll on the final passage of Engrossed House Bill No. 1848, as amended by the Senate and the bill passed the Senate by the following vote: Yeas, 46; Nays, 1; Absent, 0; Excused, 2.

      Voting yea: Senators Benson, Benton, Berkey, Brandland, Brown, Carrell, Deccio, Delvin, Doumit, Eide, Esser, Fairley, Finkbeiner, Franklin, Fraser, Hargrove, Hewitt, Honeyford, Jacobsen, Johnson, Kastama, Keiser, Kline, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, Morton, Mulliken, Oke, Parlette, Pflug, Poulsen, Prentice, Pridemore, Rasmussen, Regala, Roach, Rockefeller, Schmidt, Schoesler, Sheldon, Shin, Spanel, Stevens, Swecker, Weinstein and Zarelli - 46

      Voting nay: Senator Thibaudeau - 1

      Excused: Senators Haugen and McCaslin - 2

      ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO. 1848, as amended by the Senate, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed. There being no objection, the title of the bill was ordered to stand as the title of the act.

      The Senate resumed consideration of Engrossed House Bill No. 1268 which had been deferred on the previous day.

MOTION

      On motion of Senator Eide, the rules were suspended, Engrossed House Bill No. 1268, as amended by the Senate was advanced to third reading, the second reading considered the third and the bill was placed on final passage.

REMARKS BY SENATOR KOHL-WELLES

Senator Kohl-Welles: “Thank you Mr. President. Well, we’re voting now on the bill known as ‘stem-cell research’ and we talked a lot about it already with amendments that were offered last night, but it’s very important to recognize that this legislation that is ground-breaking, that will bring scientific research to our state that has the potential for, not only assisting thousands and thousands of people, if not more, by finding an eventual cure to some of our most debilitating diseases such as Alzheimer’s; Parkinson’s Disease; cancer; childhood diabetes; adult diabetes; and so forth, also has the potential to do a great deal for our economy. We want to be able to keep the research efforts that have been ongoing in our state since the last thirty years. In fact, at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, we had the first stem-cell research in the world. We have premier scientists, with the University of Washington being the number one public institution in the country to receive federal funds. And we would like our premier scientists to stay in our state and not go to other places where embryonic stem-cell research is now allowed, such as in California; New Jersey; soon to be Massachusetts; and other states are vying for the ability to have the premier research scientists be working on these important efforts, but there are serious considerations to this effort and what this bill represents is not only creating a state policy for conducting stem-cell research, utilizing therapeutic cloning, but there are regulations that are needed and have not existed especially with regard to the source of the embryonic tissue that is needed for stem-cell research, mainly through in-vitro fertilization. This bill is very important, because it does establish regulations. It prohibits reproductive cloning. It prohibits the sale of unused embryos as a result of in-vitro fertilization. It places penalties, $500,000, for the conducting or engaging in reproductive cloning. So …”

      Pursuant to Rule 29, imposed by the Senate earlier in the day, debate was limited to three minutes.

REMARKS BY SENATOR MULLIKEN

Senator Mulliken: “Thank you Mr. President. I think this is a tragedy and it’s a travesty. And I’m absolutely overwhelmed with a broken heart, because I believe that God’s heart is broken that we would even be considering exchanging one life for another. We don’t have to have a moral discussion on this issue. We can have our cake and eat it too. We can have adult stem-cell research which has proven ninety-nine percent effective in the early studies. We have countries that are developing stem-cells out of tissue from our nostrils in Australia and they can create a heart, they can create a kidney from just adult tissue which would be our own DNA - there’s no rejection. Embryonic stem-cells aren’t even proven to be effective. Zero, zero effectiveness out of embryonic stem-cells in all the research that they’ve done. And, I know, everybody in this room has made up their minds. But I hope that there’s at least one or two more people in this chamber whose hearts are going to be broken tonight if they go home and vote for this, because this a tragic day in our state that we would legalize this kind of behavior, this kind of immoral research. We don’t have to have the moral debate. We can have the scientific and medical assurance of finding cures for Parkinson’s disease, for Lou Gehrig’s disease, for diabetes, for all the diseases that plague our family members and the people we love. I have two great aunts that died of Parkinson’s disease. There’s nothing I’d like better than to find a cure for a disease that debilitates the body while the mind continues to work and know exactly what is happening and there’s nothing you can do to stop it. We can have that with adult stem-cell research and emphasis on that kind of research. We don’t have to exchange a life for another. And I urge you to please vote no on final passage.”

REMARKS BY SENATOR FRANKLIN

Senator Franklin: “Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Senate, I would first like to say, thank my colleagues for the civility of the discussion that has gone on with regards to this very, very important issue. It’s an issue that many have very strong feelings about. I had to take a course in embryology at the University of Puget Sound when I returned a few, several years ago in pursuit of my undergraduate degree which was a major in science. And to tell you the truth, in the very early hours after fertilization, I could not really identify anything, but a clump of cells under the microscope. These cells that had not been assigned to a home and that home would be whether that cell would be developed into a nose, an ear, an eye, a mouth. This is what researchers are concentrating on, rudimentary cells. Not having been assigned to a home in hopes of teasing these cells in order to be able to find a cure for those very, very debilitating diseases such as Lou Gehrig’s disease, which is known as ALS, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, diabetes, some cancers. Prohibiting, for me, which allows me to really support this bill, is the prohibiting of human cloning, a bill which I had put forth in the last session which did not get passed because of a very strong feeling. The bill is made stronger because of a Class C felony. It was not as strong as it should have been. My fear is that the science are moving so fast, and the technology, is moving so fast that public policy is not keeping up. My fear is that some mad scientist somewhere without anything in control, any public policy, will be allowed to create another Frankenstein and that is really my greatest fear. We need to be able to have some public policy in place. As we look over the world, we know that it is going to happen. Be not, don’t think that it will not happen, that someone will try to clone a human being, but what we are saying, it should not happen here in this state and we need to have a public policy. This bill, of course, is not an all to end all. We must be always alert. This bill casts some light, some sunshine on what is taking place. Science, as we know, tend to operate in a very closed environment. What we need is to have this ...”

      Pursuant to Rule 29, imposed by the Senate earlier in the day, debate was limited to three minutes.