(Effective until January 1, 2025)
Reviewing officer or officers—Designation and authority.
(1) The designation of a reviewing officer or officers must be consistent with the requirements of RCW
34.05.491 and the reviewing officer or officers must not have personally participated in the decision made by the school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization or SEBB program.
(2) The reviewing officer or officers must review the initial order and the record to determine if the initial order was correctly decided and make any inquiries necessary to ascertain whether the proceeding must be converted to a formal administrative hearing.
(3) The reviewing officer or officers will issue a final order that will either:
(a) Affirm the initial order in whole or in part; or
(b) Reverse the initial order in whole or in part; or
(c) Remand to the presiding officer in whole or in part.
(4) A reviewing officer or officers are limited to those powers granted by the state constitution, statutes, rules, or applicable case law.
(5) A reviewing officer or officers may not decide that a rule is invalid or unenforceable.
(6) In addition to the record, the reviewing officer or officers may employ the authority's expertise as a basis for the decision.
[Statutory Authority: RCW
41.05.021 and
41.05.160. WSR 22-13-168 (Admin #2022-01), § 182-32-2150, filed 6/21/22, effective 1/1/23. Statutory Authority: RCW
41.05.021,
41.05.160 and 2020 c 231. WSR 20-16-067 (Admin #2020-04), § 182-32-2150, filed 7/28/20, effective 8/28/20. Statutory Authority: RCW
41.05.021,
41.05.160, 2017 3rd sp.s. c 13, 2018 c 260, and SEBB policy resolutions. WSR 19-14-093 (Admin #2019-01), § 182-32-2150, filed 7/1/19, effective 8/1/19. Statutory Authority: RCW
41.05.021,
41.05.160 and SEBB policy resolutions. WSR 19-01-055 (Admin #2018-01), § 182-32-2150, filed 12/14/18, effective 1/14/19.]
(Effective January 1, 2025)
Reviewing officer or officers—Designation and authority.
(1) The designation of a reviewing officer or officers must be consistent with the requirements of RCW
34.05.491 and the reviewing officer or officers must not have personally participated in the decision made by the school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization, employer group, or SEBB program.
(2) The reviewing officer or officers must review the initial order and the record to determine if the initial order was correctly decided and make any inquiries necessary to ascertain whether the proceeding must be converted to a formal administrative hearing.
(3) The reviewing officer or officers will issue a final order that will either:
(a) Affirm the initial order in whole or in part; or
(b) Reverse the initial order in whole or in part; or
(c) Remand to the presiding officer in whole or in part.
(4) A reviewing officer or officers are limited to those powers granted by the state constitution, statutes, rules, or applicable case law.
(5) A reviewing officer or officers may not decide that a rule is invalid or unenforceable.
(6) In addition to the record, the reviewing officer or officers may employ the authority's expertise as a basis for the decision.
[Statutory Authority: RCW
41.05.021,
41.05.160,
41.05.740, 2023 c 13 § 2, and 2023 c 51 § 3. WSR 24-15-107 (Admin #2024-01), § 182-32-2150, filed 7/22/24, effective 1/1/25. Statutory Authority: RCW
41.05.021 and
41.05.160. WSR 22-13-168 (Admin #2022-01), § 182-32-2150, filed 6/21/22, effective 1/1/23. Statutory Authority: RCW
41.05.021,
41.05.160 and 2020 c 231. WSR 20-16-067 (Admin #2020-04), § 182-32-2150, filed 7/28/20, effective 8/28/20. Statutory Authority: RCW
41.05.021,
41.05.160, 2017 3rd sp.s. c 13, 2018 c 260, and SEBB policy resolutions. WSR 19-14-093 (Admin #2019-01), § 182-32-2150, filed 7/1/19, effective 8/1/19. Statutory Authority: RCW
41.05.021,
41.05.160 and SEBB policy resolutions. WSR 19-01-055 (Admin #2018-01), § 182-32-2150, filed 12/14/18, effective 1/14/19.]