Exhibit number | Author and paper title |
| 8-447 | Lauwerys et. al., Guide for physicians, "Health Maintenance of Workers Exposed to Cadmium," published by the Cadmium Council. |
| 4-67 | Takenaka, S., H. Oldiges, H. Konig, D. Hochrainer, G. Oberdorster. "Carcinogenicity of Cadmium Chloride Aerosols in Wistar Rats." JNCI 70:367-373, 1983. (32) |
| 4-68 | Thun, M.J., T.M. Schnoor, A.B. Smith, W.E. Halperin, R.A. Lemen. "Mortality Among a Cohort of U.S. Cadmium Production Workers—An Update." JNCI 74(2):325-33, 1985. (8) |
| 4-25 | Elinder, C.G., Kjellstrom, T., Hogstedt, C., et al., "Cancer Mortality of Cadmium Workers." Brit. J. Ind. Med. 42:651-655, 1985. (14) |
| 4-26 | Ellis, K.J. et al., "Critical Concentrations of Cadmium in Human Renal Cortex: Dose Effect Studies to Cadmium Smelter Workers." J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 7:691-703, 1981. (76) |
| 4-27 | Ellis, K.J., S.H. Cohn and T.J. Smith. "Cadmium Inhalation Exposure Estimates: Their Significance with Respect to Kidney and Liver Cadmium Burden." J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 15:173-187, 1985. |
| 4-28 | Falck, F.Y., Jr., Fine, L.J., Smith, R.G., McClatchey, K.D., Annesley, T., England, B., and Schork, A.M. "Occupational Cadmium Exposure and Renal Status." Am. J. Ind. Med. 4:541, 1983. (64) |
| 8-86A | Friberg, L., C.G. Elinder, et al., "Cadmium and Health a Toxicological and Epidemiological Appraisal, Volume I, Exposure, Dose, and Metabolism." CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1986. (Available from the OSHA Technical Data Center) |
| 8-86B | Friberg, L., C.G. Elinder, et al., "Cadmium and Health: A Toxicological and Epidemiological Appraisal, Volume II, Effects and Response." CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1986. (Available from the OSHA Technical Data Center) |
| L-140-45 | Elinder, C.G., "Cancer Mortality of Cadmium Workers," Brit. J. Ind. Med., 42, 651-655, 1985. |
| L-140-50 | Thun, M., Elinder, C.G., Friberg, L, "Scientific Basis for an Occupational Standard for Cadmium, Am. J. Ind. Med., 20; 629-642, 1991. |
(5) Information sheet. The information sheet (subsection (8) of this section, Attachment 3) or an equally explanatory one should be provided to you after any biological monitoring results are reviewed by the physician, or where applicable, after any medical examination.
(6) Attachment 1—Appendix A, summary chart and Tables A and B of actions triggered by biological monitoring.
(a) Summary chart: WAC
296-62-07423(3) Medical surveillance—Categorizing biological monitoring results.
(i) Biological monitoring results categories are set forth in Table A for the periods ending December 31, 1998, and for the period beginning January 1, 1999.
(ii) The results of the biological monitoring for the initial medical exam and the subsequent exams must determine an employee's biological monitoring result category.
(b) Actions triggered by biological monitoring.
(i) The actions triggered by biological monitoring for an employee are set forth in Table B.
(ii) The biological monitoring results for each employee under WAC
296-62-07423(3) must determine the actions required for that employee. That is, for any employee in biological monitoring category C, the employer will perform all of the actions for which there is an X in column C of Table B.
(iii) An employee is assigned the alphabetical category ("A" being the lowest) depending upon the test results of the three biological markers.
(iv) An employee is assigned category A if monitoring results for all three biological markers fall at or below the levels indicated in the table listed for category A.
(v) An employee is assigned category B if any monitoring result for any of the three biological markers fall within the range of levels indicated in the table listed for category B, providing no result exceeds the levels listed for category B.
(vi) An employee is assigned category C if any monitoring result for any of the three biological markers are above the levels listed for category C.
(c) The user of Tables A and B should know that these tables are provided only to facilitate understanding of the relevant provisions of WAC
296-62-07423. Tables A and B are not meant to add to or subtract from the requirements of those provisions.
Table A
Categorization of Biological Monitoring Results
Applicable Through 1998 Only
| Monitoring result categories |
Biological marker | A | B | C |
Cadmium in urine (CdU) (µg/g creatinine) | ≤=3 | ˃3 and ≤=15 | ˃15 |
β2-microglobulin (β2-M) (µg/g creatinine) | ≤=300 | ˃300 and ≤=1500 | ˃1500* |
Cadmium in blood (CdB) (µg/liter whole blood) | ≤=5 | ˃5 and ≤=15 | ˃15 |
* | If an employee's β2-M levels are above 1,500 µg/g creatinine, in order for mandatory medical removal to be required (See WAC 296-62-07441, Appendix A Table B.), either the employee's CdU level must also be ˃3 µg/g creatinine or CdB level must also be ˃5 µg/liter whole blood. |
Applicable Beginning January 1, 1999
| Monitoring result categories |
Biological marker | A | B | C |
Cadmium in urine (CdU) (µg/g creatinine) | ≤=3 | ˃3 and ≤=7 | ˃7 |
β2-microglobulin (β2-M) (µg/g creatinine) | ≤=300 | ˃300 and ≤=750 | ˃750* |
Cadmium in blood (CdB) (µg/liter whole blood) | ≤=5 | ˃5 and ≤=10 | ˃10 |
* | If an employee's β2-M levels are above 750 µg/g creatinine, in order for mandatory medical removal to be required (See WAC 296-62-07441, Appendix A Table B.), either the employee's CdU level must also be ˃3 µg/g creatinine or CdB level must also be ˃5 µg/liter whole blood. |
Table B—Actions determined by biological monitoring.
This table presents the actions required based on the monitoring result in Table A. Each item is a separate requirement in citing noncompliance. For example, a medical examination within ninety days for an employee in category B is separate from the requirement to administer a periodic medical examination for category B employees on an annual basis.
Table B
Monitoring result category
| | A1 | B1 | C1 |
Required actions |
(1) Biological monitoring: |
| (a) Annual. | X | | |
| (b) Semiannual | | X | |
| (c) Quarterly | | | X |
(2) Medical examination: |
| (a) Biennial | X | | |
| (b) Annual. | | X | |
| (c) Semiannual. | | | X |
| (d) Within 90 days | | X | X |
(3) Assess within two weeks: |
| (a) Excess cadmium exposure | | X | X |
| (b) Work practices | | X | X |
| (c) Personal hygiene | | X | X |
| (d) Respirator usage | | X | X |
| (e) Smoking history | | X | X |
| (f) Hygiene facilities | | X | X |
| (g) Engineering controls | | X | X |
| (h) Correct within 30 days | | X | X |
| (i) Periodically assess exposures | | | X |
(4) Discretionary medical removal | | X | X |
(5) Mandatory medical removal | | | X2 |
1 | For all employees covered by medical surveillance exclusively because of exposures prior to the effective date of this standard, if they are in Category A, the employer shall follow the requirements of WAC 296-62-07423 (3)(a)(ii) and (4)(e)(i). If they are in Category B or C, the employer shall follow the requirements of WAC 296-62-07423 (4)(e)(ii) and (iii). |
2 | See footnote in Table A. |
(7) Attachment 2, list of medications.
(a) A list of the more common medications that a physician, and the employee, may wish to review is likely to include some of the following:
(i) Anticonvulsants: Paramethadione, phenytoin, trimethadone;
(ii) Antihypertensive drugs: Captopril, methyldopa;
(iii) Antimicrobials: Aminoglycosides, amphotericin B, cephalosporins, ethambutol;
(iv) Antineoplastic agents: Cisplatin, methotrexate, mitomycin-C, nitrosoureas, radiation;
(v) Sulfonamide diuretics: Acetazolamide, chlorthalidone, furosemide, thiazides;
(vi) Halogenated alkanes, hydrocarbons, and solvents that may occur in some settings: Carbon tetrachloride, ethylene glycol, toluene; iodinated radiographic contrast media; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; and
(vii) Other miscellaneous compounds: Acetaminophen, allopurinol, amphetamines, azathioprine, cimetidine, cyclosporine, lithium, methoxyflurane, methysergide, D-penicillamine, phenacetin, phenendione.
(b) A list of drugs associated with acute interstitial nephritis includes:
(i) Antimicrobial drugs: Cephalosporins, chloramphenicol, colistin, erythromycin, ethambutol, isoniazid, para-amin-osalicylic acid, penicillins, polymyxin B, rifampin, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, and vancomycin;
(ii) Other miscellaneous drugs: Allopurinol, antipyrine, azathioprine, captopril, cimetidine, clofibrate, methyldopa, phenindione, phenylpropanolamine, phenytoin, probenecid, sulfinpyrazone, sulfonamide diuretics, triamterene; and
(iii) Metals: Bismuth, gold. This list has been derived from commonly available medical textbooks (e.g., Ex. 14-18). The list has been included merely to facilitate the physician's, employer's, and employee's understanding. The list does not represent an official OSHA opinion or policy regarding the use of these medications for particular employees. The use of such medications should be under physician discretion.
(8) Attachment 3—Biological monitoring and medical examination results.
Employee
Testing
Date
Cadmium in Urine ___ µg/g Cr—Normal Levels: ≤=3 µg/g Cr.
Cadmium in Blood ___ µg/lwb—Normal Levels: ≤=5 µg/lwb.
Beta-2-microglobulin in Urine ___ µg/g Cr-Normal Levels: ≤=300 µg/g Cr.
Physical Examination Results:
N/A ___ Satisfactory ___
Unsatisfactory ___ (see physician again).
Physician's Review of Pulmonary Function Test:
N/A ___ Normal ___ Abnormal ___.
Next biological monitoring or
medical examination scheduled
for __________________
(a) The biological monitoring program has been designed for three main purposes:
(i) To identify employees at risk of adverse health effects from excess, chronic exposure to cadmium;
(ii) To prevent cadmium-induced disease(s); and
(iii) To detect and minimize existing cadmium-induced disease(s).
(b) The levels of cadmium in the urine and blood provide an estimate of the total amount of cadmium in the body. The amount of a specific protein in the urine (beta-2-microglobulin) indicates changes in kidney function. All three tests must be evaluated together. A single mildly elevated result may not be important if testing at a later time indicates that the results are normal and the workplace has been evaluated to decrease possible sources of cadmium exposure. The levels of cadmium or beta-2-microglobulin may change over a period of days to months and the time needed for those changes to occur is different for each worker.
(c) If the results for biological monitoring are above specific "high levels" (cadmium urine greater than 10 micrograms per gram of creatinine µg/g Cr), cadmium blood greater than 10 micrograms per liter of whole blood (µg/lwb), or beta-2-microglobulin greater than 1000 micrograms per gram of creatinine (µg/g Cr)), the worker has a much greater chance of developing other kidney diseases.
(d) One way to measure for kidney function is by measuring beta-2-microglobulin in the urine. Beta-2-microglobulin is a protein which is normally found in the blood as it is being filtered in the kidney, and the kidney reabsorbs or returns almost all of the beta-2-microglobulin to the blood. A very small amount (less than 300 µg/g Cr in the urine) of beta-2-microglobulin is not reabsorbed into the blood, but is released in the urine. If cadmium damages the kidney, the amount of beta-2-microglobulin in the urine increases because the kidney cells are unable to reabsorb the beta-2-microglobulin normally. An increase in the amount of beta-2-microglobulin in the urine is a very early sign of kidney dysfunction. A small increase in beta-2-microglobulin in the urine will serve as an early warning sign that the worker may be absorbing cadmium from the air, cigarettes contaminated in the workplace, or eating in areas that are cadmium contaminated.
(e) Even if cadmium causes permanent changes in the kidney's ability to reabsorb beta-2-microglobulin, and the beta-2-microglobulin is above the "high levels," the loss of kidney function may not lead to any serious health problems. Also, renal function naturally declines as people age. The risk for changes in kidney function for workers who have biological monitoring results between the "normal values" and the "high levels" is not well known. Some people are more cadmium-tolerant, while others are more cadmium-susceptible.
(f) For anyone with even a slight increase of beta-2-microglobulin, cadmium in the urine, or cadmium in the blood, it is very important to protect the kidney from further damage. Kidney damage can come from other sources than excess cadmium-exposure so it is also recommended that if a worker's levels are "high" they should receive counseling about drinking more water; avoiding cadmium-tainted tobacco and certain medications (nephrotoxins, acetaminophen); controlling diet, vitamin intake, blood pressure and diabetes; etc.
[Statutory Authority: RCW
49.17.010,
49.17.040,
49.17.050, and
49.17.060. WSR 19-01-094, § 296-62-07441, filed 12/18/18, effective 1/18/19. Statutory Authority: RCW
49.17.010, [49.17].040 and [49.17].050. WSR 99-10-071, § 296-62-07441, filed 5/4/99, effective 9/1/99. Statutory Authority: Chapter
49.17 RCW. WSR 94-15-096 (Order 94-07), § 296-62-07441, filed 7/20/94, effective 9/20/94; WSR 93-21-075 (Order 93-06), § 296-62-07441, filed 10/20/93, effective 12/1/93; WSR 93-07-044 (Order 93-01), § 296-62-07441, filed 3/13/93, effective 4/27/93.]