(1) If a work plan is not approved by the director, then the county must submit the following information to the department:

(a) The work plan and any supporting documentation submitted to the commission;

(b) The revised work plan and a description of how the county has addressed any deficiencies or issues cited by the commission;

(c) Evidence of adequate public notice;

(d) Copies of all public, agency and tribal comments received, including a record of names and addresses of interested parties involved in the local government review process;

(e) Adopted resolutions of the county legislative body, if any; and

(f) Meeting minutes and public testimony for those meetings.

(2) Work plan goals and benchmarks not met:

(a) The approved work plan, including the goals and benchmarks;

(b) The adaptive management plan and any supporting documents submitted to the commission;

(c) A revised work plan, adaptive management plan, and a description of how the county has addressed any deficiencies or issues cited by the commission;

(d) Evidence of adequate public notice;

(e) Copies of all public, agency and tribal comments received, including a record of names and addresses of interested parties involved in the local government review process;

(f) Adopted resolutions of the county legislative body, if any; and

(g) Meeting minutes and public testimony for those meetings.

(3) Adequate funding not received by county or state agencies with responsibilities:

(a) The approved work plan and any supporting documentation submitted to the commission; and

(b) Determination by the commission that county or state agencies with responsibilities have not received adequate funding.

(4) The commission has determined that the watershed has not received adequate funding to implement the plan:

(a) The approved work plan and any other supporting documentation submitted to the commission; and

(b) Determination from the commission that adequate funding for the watershed is not available.