PERMANENT RULES
JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Effective Date of Rule: Thirty-one days after filing.
Purpose: CJCRP Rule 28, Reinstatement of Eligibility, the proposed revised language more closely addresses the typical circumstances of a request for reinstatement and clarifies (but does not change) the point that the investigation of a former judge's present fitness for judicial office is confidential. In addition, the proposed revisions clarify that the commission deliberations are confidential and that the reinstatement decision is public.
Citation of Existing Rules Affected by this Order: Amending CJCRP 28.
Statutory Authority for Adoption: WA Const. Art. IV. Sec. 31.
Other Authority: Chapter 2.64 RCW.
Adopted under notice filed as WSR 10-06-104 on March 2, 2010.
Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Comply with Federal Statute: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; Federal Rules or Standards: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; or Recently Enacted State Statutes: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted at Request of a Nongovernmental Entity: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted on the Agency's Own Initiative: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Clarify, Streamline, or Reform Agency Procedures: New 0, Amended 1, Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted Using Negotiated Rule Making: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; Pilot Rule Making: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; or Other Alternative Rule Making: New 0, Amended 1, Repealed 0.
Date Adopted: May 14, 2010.
J. Reiko Callner
Executive Director
AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending 96-01 filed 08/13/96)
RULE 28. REINSTATEMENT OF ELIGIBILITY
An individual, whose eligibility for judicial office had
been removed by the supreme court, or by resignation and
stipulated order ((of closure)) in a proceeding before the
commission, may file with the commission a petition for
reinstatement of eligibility. The petition shall set forth
the residence and mailing address of the petitioner, the date
of removal by the supreme court, or resignation and stipulated
order ((of closure)) in the proceeding before the commission
and a concise statement of facts ((claimed to)) justifying
reinstatement. The petition shall be a public document.
The commission may refer the petition to the investigative officer for investigation of the character and fitness of the petitioner to be eligible for holding judicial office. The investigative officer may seek and consider any information from any source that may relate to the issues of character and fitness or the reinstatement. The investigation shall be confidential.
Petitioner shall make an affirmative showing by clear, cogent and convincing evidence, that reinstatement will not be detrimental to the integrity and standing of the judiciary and the administration of justice, or be contrary to the public interest.
In cases where the supreme court has removed the
individual's eligibility for judicial office, t((T))he
commission will recommend to the supreme court in writing that
the petitioner should or should not be reinstated to
eligibility to hold judicial office as provided by these rules
and the Discipline Rules for Judges. In cases where the
individual stipulated in a proceeding at the commission level
to ineligibility for judicial office, the commission shall
deliberate in executive session, and issue a public decision
granting or denying the petitioner's reinstatement request for
eligibility to hold judicial office. The commission will
provide a copy of the recommendation or decision to petitioner
or petitioner's lawyer.
The petitioner shall be responsible, and shall make adequate provision, for payment of all costs and reasonable attorneys' fees in these proceedings in a manner determined by the commission. Failure to pay the amount assessed shall be grounds to dismiss the petition.
Reviser's note: The typographical errors in the above material occurred in the copy filed by the commission on judicial conduct and appear in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.