PERMANENT RULES
PILOTAGE COMMISSIONERS
Effective Date of Rule: Thirty-one days after filing.
Purpose: To update the board's practices and procedures for administrative hearings so they are consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act model rules of procedure (chapter 10-98 WAC), and chapter 363-116 WAC, and the civil rules of Washington. The proposed changes are also intended to modify the scope of hearings and associated discovery as well as cover any necessary housekeeping matters.
Citation of Existing Rules Affected by this Order: Repealing chapter 363-11 WAC (twenty-two sections); and amending chapter 363-11 WAC (twenty-two sections).
Statutory Authority for Adoption: Chapter 88.16 RCW.
Adopted under notice filed as WSR 11-23-184 on November 23, 2011.
Changes Other than Editing from Proposed to Adopted Version: Modifications were made to WAC 363-11-420(3) dealing with the "scope of discovery, relevant documents for hearings and record of proceedings" relating to the performance of pilots.
Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Comply with Federal Statute: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; Federal Rules or Standards: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; or Recently Enacted State Statutes: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted at Request of a Nongovernmental Entity: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0.
Number of Sections Adopted on the Agency's Own Initiative: New 0, Amended 22, Repealed 22.
Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Clarify, Streamline, or Reform Agency Procedures: New 0, Amended 22, Repealed 22.
Number of Sections Adopted Using Negotiated Rule Making: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; Pilot Rule Making: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; or Other Alternative Rule Making: New 0, Amended 22, Repealed 22.
Date Adopted: March 27, 2012.
Peggy Larson
Executive Director
OTS-4423.2
AMENDATORY SECTION(Amending WSR 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97,
effective 3/28/97)
WAC 363-11-001
General rule and information.
The
chairperson of the board of pilotage commissioners is the
assistant secretary of marine operations of the department of
transportation of the state of Washington or the assistant
secretary's designee. Information regarding the Pilotage Act,
complaints and other matters coming under the provisions of
the Pilotage Act and the board's rules and regulations may be
obtained by contacting the chairperson or the board's
((secretary)) staff in person or in writing at the Office of
the Board of Pilotage Commissioners((, Pier 52, Seattle,
Washington 98104)). All public documents in the custody of
the board may be obtained upon request made to the chairperson
of the Board of Pilotage Commissioners((, Pier 52, Seattle,
Washington 98104)).
Any matter filed with the chairperson and/or the
((secretary)) staff will be brought to the attention of the
board at its next regular meeting, the date of which is the
second Thursday of each month. Persons desiring to do so may
also attend the board meetings((, which are held at Pier 52,
Seattle, Washington)). Please see www.pilotage.wa.gov for
office hours, meeting times and locations.
The purpose and scope of activity of the board of pilotage commissioners are set out in chapter 88.16 RCW and are as follows:
Scope: (1) Puget Sound pilotage district.
(2) Grays Harbor pilotage district.
Purpose: The purpose of the board of pilotage commissioners is to prevent the loss of human lives, loss of property and vessels and to protect the marine environment by maintenance of a competent and efficient pilotage service on the state's waters. To accomplish this end the board examines proficiency of potential pilots, licenses pilots, regulates pilots, enforces the use of pilots, sets pilotage rates, receives and investigates reports of accidents involving pilots, keeps records of various matters affecting pilotage and fulfills other responsibilities enumerated in chapter 88.16 RCW.
[Recodified as § 363-11-001. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035. 80-03-081 (Order 79-6, Resolution No. 79-6), § 296-11-001, filed 3/4/80. Statutory Authority: RCW 88.16.035 and 88.16.155. 78-09-057 (Order 78-2, Resolution No. 78-2), § 296-11-001, filed 8/23/78; Order 2-68, § 296-11-001, filed 11/1/68.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-090. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.090, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-230. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.230, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-240. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.240, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-250. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.250, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-260. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.260, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-270. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.270, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
(2) Depositions and interrogatories in hearings brought pursuant to WAC 363-116-083 and 363-116-084. The board and the exam committee shall be required to produce for depositions no more than a total of three fact witnesses (two board/committee members, one test developer), and no more than one expert witness, in connection with any hearing requested pursuant to WAC 363-116-083 and 363-116-084, unless the board's chair, in his/her sole discretion, determines that additional witnesses are necessary. If the petitioner asserts that there is a necessity for additional witnesses, he/she must demonstrate to the presiding officer that "exceptional circumstances" exist and that such information cannot be obtained through other means in order to increase the number of witnesses.
No more than five written interrogatories (including subparts) in total may be submitted to other board and/or exam committee members, which may then be submitted as a part of the record of proceedings upon a motion duly made.
The scope of the deposition and interrogatories shall be limited to those issues set forth in WAC 363-116-083(5) and 363-116-084(5) and shall not include inquiry into the mental processes of a board or committee member concerning their decision making processes once a decision has been made and a written explanation has been provided. A written explanation may be in the form of a written recommendation, board or committee meeting minutes, performance evaluations, correspondence to the petitioner, and/or other documents submitted to the board as a part of the decision making process.
(3) Depositions and interrogatories in hearings brought pursuant to WAC 363-116-086.
(a) Board/TEC witnesses - The board and the trainee evaluation committee (TEC) shall be required to produce no more than a total of two fact witnesses (one board witness, one TEC witness) and no more than one expert witness in support of its decisions made pursuant to WAC 363-116-080, unless the chair, in his/her sole discretion, determines that additional witnesses are necessary. If the petitioner asserts that there is a necessity for additional witnesses, he/she must demonstrate to the presiding officer that "exceptional circumstances" exist and that such information cannot be obtained through other means in order to increase the number of witnesses.
No more than five written interrogatories (including subparts) in total may be submitted to other board and/or TEC members, which may then be submitted as a part of the record of proceedings upon a motion duly made. The scope of the deposition and interrogatories will be limited as set forth in WAC 363-116-086 (3)(b) and (c) and shall not include inquiry into the mental processes of a board or committee member concerning their decision making processes once a decision has been made and a written explanation has been provided. A written explanation may be in the form of a written recommendation, board or committee meeting minutes, correspondence to the petitioner, training trip reports, training trip report summary spreadsheets, and/or other documents submitted to the board as a part of the decision making process.
(b) Training and supervising pilots - The board has determined that requiring or permitting the deposition of training and supervising pilots in connection with a hearing pursuant to WAC 363-116-086 would jeopardize the integrity of the training program and would stifle candid and honest assessments of a trainee's performance in the training program. The training and supervising pilots prepare written training trip reports for each training trip. Those reports shall speak for themselves. Notwithstanding any other provision in these regulations, no training or supervising pilot shall be deposed, or called as a witness, in connection with a hearing brought pursuant to WAC 363-116-086. Consistent with WAC 363-11-410, to the extent a particular training trip report is considered by a party to be vague and/or ambiguous, a party may seek, by way of motion, a declaration from a training or supervising pilot, seeking clarification of specific issues which the party believes, for good cause shown, should be clarified. Such declaration may then become a part of the record of proceedings.
(4) Depositions and interrogatories in hearings brought pursuant to RCW 88.16.100(5), WAC 363-116-370 and 363-116-420. The board shall be required to produce for depositions no more than a total of two fact witnesses and, if it deems necessary one expert witness, in connection with any hearing requested pursuant to RCW 88.16.100(5), WAC 363-116-370 and 363-116-420, unless the board's chair, in his/her sole discretion, determines that additional witnesses are necessary. If the petitioner asserts that there is a necessity for additional witnesses, he/she must show just cause to the presiding officer as to why additional witnesses should be subject to deposition and/or interrogatories and that such information cannot be obtained through other means.
Unless the presiding officer rules otherwise based on a showing of just cause, no more than five written interrogatories (including subparts) in total may be submitted to other board members concerning the matters at issue, which may then be submitted as a part of the record of proceedings upon a motion duly made.
The scope of the deposition and interrogatories will be limited as set forth in RCW 88.16.100(5), WAC 363-116-370 and 363-116-420 and shall not include inquiry into the mental processes of a board or committee member concerning their decision making processes once a decision has been made and an adequate written explanation has been provided. A written explanation may be in the form of a written recommendation, board or committee meeting minutes, correspondence to the petitioner, and/or other documents submitted to the board as a part of the decision making process.
[Recodified as § 363-11-280. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.280, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-290. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.290, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-310. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.310, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-330. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.330, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-350. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.350, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
(1) Be correctly captioned as to name of agency and name of proceeding;
(2) Designate all parties and counsel to the proceeding;
(3) Include a concise statement of the nature and background of the proceeding;
(4) Be accompanied by appropriate numbered findings of fact and conclusions of law;
(5) Whenever practical, include the reason or reasons for the particular order or remedy afforded;
(6) Wherever practical, be referenced to specific provisions of the law and/or regulations appropriate thereto, together with reasons and precedents relied upon to support the same.)) (1) Testimony in hearings brought pursuant to WAC 363-116-083 and 363-116-084. The board and the exam committee shall be required to produce no more than a total of three fact witnesses (two board/committee members, one test developer), and no more than one expert witness, for any hearing requested pursuant to WAC 363-116-083 and 363-116-084, unless the board's chair, in his/her sole discretion, determines that additional witnesses are necessary. If the petitioner asserts that there is a necessity for additional witnesses, he/she must demonstrate to the presiding officer that "exceptional circumstances" exist and that such information cannot be obtained through other means in order to increase the number of witnesses.
The scope of the hearing shall be limited to those issues set forth in WAC 363-116-083(5) and 363-116-084(5) and shall not include inquiry into the mental processes of a board or committee member concerning their decision making processes once a decision has been made and a written explanation has been provided. A written explanation may be in the form of a written recommendation, board or committee meeting minutes, performance evaluations, correspondence to the petitioner, and/or other documents submitted to the board as a part of the decision making process.
(2) Testimony in hearings brought pursuant to WAC 363-116-086.
(a) Board/TEC witnesses - The board and the trainee evaluation committee (TEC) shall be required to produce no more than a total of two fact witnesses (one board witness, one TEC witness) and no more than one expert witness in support of its decisions made pursuant to WAC 363-116-080, unless the chair, in his/her sole discretion, determines that additional witnesses are necessary. If the petitioner asserts that there is a necessity for additional witnesses, he/she must demonstrate to the presiding officer that "exceptional circumstances" exist and that such information cannot be obtained through other means in order to increase the number of witnesses. The scope of the testimony for the hearing will be limited as set forth in WAC 363-116-086 (3)(b) and (c) and shall not include inquiry into the mental processes of a board or committee member concerning their decision making processes once a decision has been made and a written explanation has been provided. A written explanation may be in the form of a written recommendation, board or committee meeting minutes, training trip reports, training trip report summary spreadsheets, correspondence to the petitioner, and/or other documents submitted to the board as a part of the decision making process.
(b) Training and supervising pilots - The board has determined that requiring or permitting the testimony of training and supervising pilots in connection with a hearing pursuant to WAC 363-116-086 would jeopardize the integrity of the training program and would stifle candid and honest assessments of a trainee's performance in the training program. The training and supervising pilots prepare written training trip reports for each training trip. Those reports shall speak for themselves. Notwithstanding any other provision in these regulations, no training or supervising pilot shall be called as a witness in connection with a hearing brought pursuant to WAC 363-116-086. To the extent a particular training trip report is considered by a party to be vague and/or ambiguous, a party may seek, by way of motion, a declaration from a training or supervising pilot, seeking clarification of specific issues which the party believes, for good cause shown, should be clarified. The burden to demonstrate that there is a necessity for such a declaration shall be on the petitioner, who must demonstrate to the presiding officer that "exceptional circumstances" exist and that such information cannot be obtained through other means. Such declaration may then become a part of the record of proceedings, upon a motion duly made by a party to the proceedings.
(3) Testimony in hearings brought pursuant to RCW 88.16.100(5), WAC 363-116-370 and 363-116-420. The board shall be required to produce no more than a total of two fact witnesses and, if it deems necessary one expert witness, in connection with any hearing requested pursuant to RCW 88.16.100(5), WAC 363-116-370 and 363-116-420, unless the board's chair, in his/her sole discretion determines that additional witnesses are necessary. If the petitioner asserts that there is a necessity for additional witnesses, he/she must show just cause to the presiding officer as to why additional witnesses should testify and that such information cannot be obtained through other means.
The scope of the testimony for the hearing will be limited to those issues set forth in RCW 88.16.100(5), WAC 363-116-370 and 363-116-420 and shall not include inquiry into the mental processes of a board or committee member concerning their decision making processes once a decision has been made and an adequate written explanation has been provided. A written explanation may be in the form of a written recommendation, board or committee meeting minutes, incident reports, correspondence to the petitioner, and/or other documents submitted to the board as a part of the decision making process.
[Recodified as § 363-11-410. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.410, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
(2) Hearings brought pursuant to WAC 363-116-086. The scope of discovery and relevant admissible documents shall be limited to those materials bearing on the issues set forth in WAC 363-116-086, and as may otherwise be limited by chapter 363-11 WAC herein. Documentation and materials relating to the performance of pilot trainees other than those requesting a hearing are not relevant, they shall not be subject to discovery, they shall not be submitted as an exhibit or referenced in any hearing, nor shall they be submitted for inclusion in any hearing or record of proceeding conducted pursuant to WAC 363-116-086.
(3) Hearings brought pursuant to RCW 88.16.100(5), WAC 363-116-370 and 363-116-420. The scope of discovery and relevant admissible documents shall be limited to those materials bearing on the issues set forth in RCW 88.16.110(5), WAC 363-116-370 and 363-116-420.
In all proceedings the issues to be adjudicated shall be made initially as precise as possible, in order that hearing officers may proceed promptly to conduct the hearings on relevant and material matter only.
[Recodified as § 363-11-420. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.420, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-470. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.470, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-480. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.480, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-490. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.490, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-500. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.500, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-520. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.520, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
[Recodified as § 363-11-530. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.530, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
(1) Issue a nonbinding declaratory ruling; or
(2) Notify the person that no declaratory ruling is to be issued or
(3) Set a reasonable time and place for a hearing or the submission of written evidence upon the matter, and give reasonable notification to the person of the time and place for such hearing or submission and of the issues involved.
(4) If a hearing is held or evidence is submitted as provided in subsection (3), the board shall within a reasonable time:
(a) Issue a binding declaratory rule; or
(b) Issue a nonbinding declaratory ruling; or
(c) Notify the person that no declaratory ruling is to be issued.
[Recodified as § 363-11-580. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.580, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
(a) At the top of the page shall appear the wording "Before the board of pilotage commissioners, state of Washington," on the left side of the page below the foregoing the following caption shall be set out: "In the matter of the petition of (name of petitioning party) for a declaratory ruling." Opposite the foregoing caption shall appear the word "petition."
(b) The body of the petition shall be set out in numbered paragraphs. The first paragraph shall state the name and address of the petitioning party. The second paragraph shall state all rules or statutes that may be brought into issue by the petition. Succeeding paragraphs shall set out the state of facts relied upon in form similar to that applicable to complaints in civil actions before the superior courts of this state. The concluding paragraphs shall contain the prayer of the petitioner. The petition shall be subscribed and verified in the manner prescribed for verification of complaints in the superior courts of this state.
(c) The original and two legible copies shall be filed
with the agency. Petitions shall be on white paper, either
8 1/2" x 11" or 8 1/2" x ((13)) 14" in size.
(2) Any interested person petitioning the board of pilotage commissioners requesting the promulgation, amendment or repeal of any rules shall generally adhere to the following form for such purpose.
(a) At the top of the page shall appear the wording "Before the board of pilotage commissioners, state of Washington." On the left side of the page below the foregoing the following caption shall be set out: "In the matter of the petition of (name of petitioning party) for (state whether promulgation, amendment or repeal) of rule (or rules)." Opposite the foregoing caption shall appear the word "petition."
(b) The body of the petition shall be set out in numbered paragraphs. The first paragraph shall state the name and address of the petitioning party and whether petitioner seeks the promulgation of new rule or rules, or amendment or repeal of existing rule or rules. The second paragraph, in case of a proposed new rule or amendment of an existing rule, shall set forth the desired rule in its entirety. Where the petition is for amendment, the new matter shall be underscored and the matter proposed to be deleted shall appear in double parentheses. Where the petition is for repeal of an existing rule, such shall be stated and the rule proposed to be repealed shall either be set forth in full or shall be referred to by agency rule number. The third paragraph shall set forth concisely the reasons for the proposal of the petitioner and shall contain a statement as to the interest of the petitioner in the subject matter of the rule. Additional numbered paragraphs may be used to give full explanation of petitioner's reason for the action sought.
(c) Petitions shall be dated and signed by the person or
entity named in the first paragraph or by his attorney. The
original and two legible copies of the petition shall be filed
with the agency. Petitions shall be on white paper, either
8 1/2" x 11" or 8 1/2" x ((13)) 14" in size.
[Recodified as § 363-11-590. 97-08-042, filed 3/28/97, effective 3/28/97; Rule .08.590, effective 3/1/60, filed 3/23/60.]
The following sections of the Washington Administrative Code are repealed:
WAC 363-11-003 | Index to documents. |
WAC 363-11-070 | Computation of time. |
WAC 363-11-080 | Notice and opportunity for hearing in contested cases. |
WAC 363-11-100 | Service of process -- Upon whom served. |
WAC 363-11-110 | Service of process -- Service upon parties. |
WAC 363-11-120 | Service of process -- Method of service. |
WAC 363-11-130 | Service of process -- When service complete. |
WAC 363-11-140 | Service of process -- Filing with agency. |
WAC 363-11-150 | Subpoenas -- Where provided by law -- Form. |
WAC 363-11-160 | Subpoenas -- Issuance to parties. |
WAC 363-11-170 | Subpoenas -- Service. |
WAC 363-11-180 | Subpoenas -- Fees. |
WAC 363-11-190 | Subpoenas -- Proof of service. |
WAC 363-11-200 | Subpoenas -- Quashing. |
WAC 363-11-210 | Subpoenas -- Enforcement. |
WAC 363-11-220 | Subpoenas -- Geographical scope. |
WAC 363-11-300 | Depositions and interrogatories in contested cases -- Signing attestation and return. |
WAC 363-11-340 | Depositions upon interrogatories -- Interrogation. |
WAC 363-11-360 | Depositions upon interrogatories -- Provisions of deposition rule. |
WAC 363-11-430 | Prehearing conference rule -- Authorized. |
WAC 363-11-440 | Prehearing conference rule -- Record of conference action. |
WAC 363-11-450 | Submission of documentary evidence in advance. |