WSR 14-13-035
RULES OF COURT
STATE SUPREME COURT
[June 6, 2014]
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO RAP 16.4PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITIONGROUNDS FOR REMEDY, RAP 16.8PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITIONFILING AND SERVICE; RAP 16.8.1PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITIONPRELIMINARY REVIEW BY THE COURT, RAP 16.9PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITIONRESPONSE TO PETITION, RAP 16.12PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITIONSUPERIOR COURT HEARING, RAP 16.13PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITIONPROCEDURE AFTER REFERENCE HEARING
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
NO. 25700-A-1064
The Washington State Bar Association having recommended the adoption of the proposed amendments to RAP 16.4, RAP 16.8, RAP 16.8.1, RAP 16.9, RAP 16.12, and RAP 16.13, and the Court having considered the amendments and comments submitted thereto, and having determined that the proposed amendments will aid in the prompt and orderly administration of justice;
Now, therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED:
(a) That the amendments as shown below are adopted.
(b) That the amendments will be published in the Washington Reports and will become effective September 1, 2014.
DATED at Olympia, Washington this 6th day of June, 2014.
 
 
Madsen, C.J.
C. Johnson, J.
 
Wiggins, J.
Owens, J.
 
Gordon McCloud, J.
Fairhurst, J.
 
Gonzalez, J.
Stephens, J.
 
Yu, J.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENT
RULES OF APELLATE PROCEDURE (RAP)
RULE 16.4PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITIONGROUNDS FOR REMEDY
(a) Generally. Except as restricted by section (d), the appellate court will grant appropriate relief to a petitioner if the petitioner is under a "restraint" as defined in section (b) and the petitioner's restraint is unlawful for one or more of the reasons defined in section (c).
(b) Restraint. A petitioner is under a "restraint" if the petitioner has limited freedom because of a court decision in a civil or criminal proceeding, the petitioner is confined, the petitioner is subject to imminent confinement, or the petitioner is under some other disability resulting from a judgment or sentence in a criminal case.
(c) Unlawful Nature of Restraint. The restraint must be unlawful for one more of the following reasons:
(1) The decision in a civil or criminal proceeding was entered without jurisdiction over the person of the petitioner or the subject matter; or
(2) The conviction was obtained or the sentence or other order entered in a criminal proceeding or civil proceeding instituted by the state or local government was imposed or entered in violation of the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution or laws of the State of Washington; or
(3) Material facts exist which have not been previously presented and heard, which in the interest of justice require vacation of the conviction, sentence or other order entered in a criminal proceeding or civil proceeding instituted by the state or local government; or
(4) There has been a significant change in the law, whether substantive or procedural, which is material to the conviction, sentence, or other order entered in a criminal proceeding or a civil proceeding instituted by the state or local government, and sufficient reasons exist to require retroactive application of the changed legal standard; or
(5) Other grounds exist for a collateral attack upon a judgment in a criminal proceeding or civil proceeding instituted by the state or local government; or
(6) The conditions or manner of the restraint of petitioner are in violation of the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution or laws of the State of Washington; or
(7) Other grounds exist to challenge the legality of the restraint of petitioner.
(d) Restrictions. The appellate court will only grant relief by a personal restraint petition if other remedies which may be available to petitioner are inadequate under the circumstances and if such relief may be granted under RCW 10.73.090 or .100 and .130. No more than one petition for similar relief on behalf of the same petitioner will be entertained without good cause shown.
Reviser's note: The spelling error in the above section occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appears in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
Reviser's note: The typographical error in the above material occurred in the copy filed by the state supreme court and appears in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENT
RULES OF APELLATE PROCEDURE (RAP)
RULE 16.8PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITIONFILING AND SERVICE
(a) Filing Fee. A personal restraint petition will be filed by the clerk of the appellate court only if the statutory filing fee is paid, unless the appellate court determines that the petitioner is unable to pay the filing fee indigent. The statute requiring governing payment of a fee for filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus is controlling.
(b) Filing in Court of Appeals. A personal restraint petition filed in the Court of Appeals must be filed in the division which that includes the superior court entering the decision on the basis of which petitioner is held in custody or, if petitioner is not being held in custody on the basis of a decision, in the division in which the petitioner is located.
(c) Deficient Petitions. If the clerk of the appellate court determines that a petition submitted does not conform with this rule or with rule 16.7 (a)(1), (3), (4), (5), (6), or (7), the petition should be filed and the clerk will direct the petitioner to correct the deficiency within 60 days.
(d) Service of Petition. If petitioner's restraint is imposed by the state or local government, the clerk of the appellate court will reproduce a copy of the petition and serve the petition on the officer or agency under a duty to respond to the petition. If petitioner's restraint is imposed by a person or agency other than the state or local government, the petitioner must prepare and serve a copy of the petition on the proper respondent.
(e) Amendment of Petition. The appellate court may allow a petition to be amended. All amendments raising new grounds are subject to the time limitation provided in RCW 10.73.090 and 10.73.100.
Reviser's note: The spelling error in the above section occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appears in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
Reviser's note: The typographical error in the above material occurred in the copy filed by the state supreme court and appears in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
SUGGESTED NEW RULE
RULES OF APELLATE PROCEDURE (RAP)
RULE 16.8A1PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITIONPRELIMINARY REVIEW BY COURT
(a) Preliminary Review. Upon receipt of the petition, the appellate court will conduct a preliminary review.
(b) Dismissal Without Response. The appellate court will dismiss the petition without requesting a response if it is clearly frivolous or clearly barred by RCW 10.73.090 or RAP 16.4(d).
(c) Remand to Superior Court. If the petition was originally filed as a habeas corpus petition or a motion under CrR 7.8, and the superior court clearly erred in transferring the matter to the Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals will remand the matter to the superior court. If a case is remanded pursuant to this subsection, no filing fee will be required in the Court of Appeals.
(d) Request for Response. If the appellate court does not dismiss or remand the petition, the court will request that a response be filed.
Reviser's note: The spelling error in the above section occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appears in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
Reviser's note: The typographical error in the above material occurred in the copy filed by the state supreme court and appears in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENT
RULES OF APELLATE PROCEDURE (RAP)
RULE 16.9PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITIONRESPONSE TO PETITION
(a) Generally. The respondent must serve and file a any response within 60 days after the petition is served the court requests that a response be filed, unless the time is extended by the commissioner or clerk for good cause shown, or unless the court can determine without requiring a response that the petition should be dismissed under RCW 10.73.090 or RCW 10.73.140. The response must answer the allegations in the petition. The response must state the authority for the restraint of petitioner by respondent and, if the authority is in writing, include a conformed copy of the writing. If an allegation in the petition can be answered by reference to a record of another proceeding, the response should so indicate and include a copy of those parts of the record that are relevant. Respondent should also identify in the response all material disputed questions of fact.
(b) Requirement to Admit or Deny. After the time for filing a response has passed, the appellate court may direct the respondent to admit or deny specific allegations.
Reviser's note: The spelling error in the above section occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appears in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENT
RULES OF APELLATE PROCEDURE (RAP)
RULE 16.12PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITIONSUPERIOR COURT HEARING
If the appellate court transfers the petition to a superior court, the transfer will be to the superior court for the county in which the decision was made resulting in the restraint of petitioner or, if petitioner is not being restrained on the basis of a decision, in the superior court in the county in which petitioner is located. If the respondent is represented by the Attorney General, the prosecuting attorney, or a municipal attorney, respondent must take steps to obtain a prompt evidentiary hearing and must serve notice of the date set for hearing on all other parties. The parties, on motion, and for good cause shown will be granted reasonable pretrial discovery. Each party has the right to subpoena witnesses. The hearing shall be held before a judge who was not involved in the challenged proceedings. The petitioner has the right to be present at the hearing, and the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses, and the right to counsel to the extent authorized by statute. The Rules of Evidence apply at the hearing. Upon the conclusion of the hearing, if the case has been transferred for a reference hearing, the superior court shall enter findings of fact and have the findings and all appellate files forwarded to the appellate court. Upon the conclusion of the hearing if the case has been transferred for a determination on the merits, the superior court shall enter findings of fact and conclusions of law and an order deciding the petition.
Reviser's note: The spelling error in the above section occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appears in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENT
RULES OF APELLATE PROCEDURE (RAP)
RULE 16.13PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITIONPROCEDURE AFTER REFERENCE HEARING
After a reference hearing and the findings of fact and appellate court files have been returned to the appellate court, the Chief Judge will dismiss the petition if the issues presented are frivolous. If the petition is not frivolous, the Chief Judge will refer the petition to a panel of judges for determination on the merits. The appellate court may, on motion of a party, order the preparation of and transmittal to the appellate court of a part or all of the record of the reference proceeding. The appellate court order will define at whose expense the record is prepared. The record will be prepared at public expense where the petitioner is indigent, as set forth in rule 16.15(h). Oral argument is governed by rule 16.11(c).
Reviser's note: The spelling error in the above section occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appears in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.