WSR 15-09-016
RULES OF COURT
STATE SUPREME COURT
[April 2, 2015]
IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (CR) CR 4PROCESS, CR 5SERVICE AND FILING OF PLEADINGS AND OTHER PAPERS, CR 6TIME, CR 8GENERAL RULES OF PLEADING, CR 9PLEADING SPECIAL MATTERS, CR 10FORM OF PLEADINGS AND OTHER PAPERS, CR 12DEFENSES AND OBJECTIONS, CR 13COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSS CLAIM, CR 14THIRD PARTY PRACTICE, CR 15AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS, CR 17PARTIES PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT: CAPACITY, CR 18JOINDER OF CLAIMS AND REMEDIES, CR 19JOINDER OF PERSONS NEEDED FOR JUST ADJUDICATION, CR 20PERMISSIVE JOINDER OF PARTIES, CR 22INTERPLEADER, CR 23CLASS ACTIONS, CR 23.1DERIVATIVE ACTIONS BY SHAREHOLDERS, CR 24INTERVENTION, CR 25SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES, CR 26GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISCOVERY, CR 27PERPETUATION OF TESTIMONY, CR 28PERSONS BEFORE WHOM DEPOSITIONS MAY BE TAKEN, CR 30DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION, CR 31DEPOSITIONS UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS, CR 32USE OF DEPOSITIONS IN COURT PROCEEDINGS, CR 36REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, CR 37FAILURE TO MAKE DISCOVERY: SANCTIONS, CR 38JURY TRIAL OF RIGHT, CR 40ASSIGNMENT OF CASES, CR 41DISMISSAL OF ACTIONS, CR 43TAKING OF TESTIMONY, CR 44.1DETERMINATION OF FOREIGN LAW, CR 46EXCEPTIONS UNNECESSARY, CR 47JURORS, CR 49VERDICTS, CR 51INSTRUCTIONS TO JURY DELIBERATION, CR 54JUDGMENT AND COSTS, CR 55DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT, CR 56SUMMARY JUDGMENT, CR 58ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, CR 59NEW TRIAL, RECONSIDERATION, AND AMENDMENTS OF JUDGMENTS, CR 60RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER, CR 63JUDGES, CR 65INJUNCTIONS, CR 65.1SECURITYPROCEEDINGS 1AGAINST SURETIES, CR 68OFFER OF JUDGMENT, CR 69EXECUTION, CR 77SUPERIOR COURTS AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS, CR 78CLERKS
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
NO. 25700-A-1099
Justice Steven Gonzalez, having recommended the expeditious adoption of the Proposed Amendments to the Superior Court Civil Rules (CR) CR 4Process, CR 5Service and Filing of Pleadings and Other Papers, CR 6Time, CR 8General Rules of Pleading, CR 9Pleading Special Matters, CR 10Form of Pleadings and Other Papers, CR 12Defenses and Objections, CR 13Counterclaim and Cross Claim, CR 14Third Party Practice, CR 15Amended and Supplemental Pleadings, CR 17Parties Plaintiff and Defendant: Capacity, CR 18Joinder of Claims and Remedies, CR 19Joinder of Persons Needed for Just Adjudication, CR 20Permissive Joinder of Parties, CR 22Interpleader, CR 23Class Actions, CR 23.1Derivative Actions by Shareholders, CR 24Intervention, CR 25Substitution of Parties, CR 26General Provisions Governing Discovery, CR 27Perpetuation of Testimony, CR 28Persons Before Whom Depositions May Be Taken, CR 30Depositions Upon Oral Examination, CR 31Depositions Upon Written Questions, CR 32Use of Depositions in Court Proceedings, CR 36Requests for Admission, CR 37Failure to Make Discovery: Sanctions, CR 38Jury Trial of Right, CR 40Assignment of Cases, CR 41Dismissal of Actions, CR 43Taking of Testimony, CR 44.1Determination of Foreign Law, CR 46Exceptions Unnecessary, CR 47Jurors, CR 49Verdicts, CR 51Instructions to Jury Deliberation, CR 54Judgment and Costs, CR 55Default and Judgment, CR 56Summary Judgment, CR 58Entry of Judgment, CR 59New Trial, Reconsideration, and Amendments of Judgments, CR 60Relief from Judgment or Order, CR 63Judges, CR 65Injunctions, CR 65.1SecurityProceedings Against Sureties, CR 68Offer of Judgment, CR 69Execution, CR 77Superior Courts and Judicial Officers, CR 78Clerks, and the Court having considered the amendments and comments submitted thereto, and having determined that the proposed amendments will aid in the prompt and orderly administration of justice;
Now, therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED:
(a) That the new rules as shown below are adopted.
(b) That the new rules will be published expeditiously in the Washington Reports and will become effective upon publication.
DATED at Olympia, Washington this 2nd day of April, 2015.
 
 
Madsen, C.J.
Johnson, J.
 
Wiggins, J.
Owens, J.
 
Gonzalez, J.
Fairhurst, J.
 
Gordon McCloud, J.
Stephens, J.
 
Yu, J.
Reviser's note: The typographical error in the above material occurred in the copy filed by the State Supreme Court and appears in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
[PROPOSED] CrR 8.10
POST TRIAL CONTACT WITH JURORS
After a jury has been discharged, or after a verdict has been returned, or after a mistrial has been declared, a lawyer who participated in the trial, a representative from that lawyer's office, or a law enforcement officer who participated in the trial shall not communicate to the jury information that was suppressed or excluded pursuant to a ruling by the judge in the case.
[PROPOSED] CrRLJ 8.13
POST-TRIAL CONTACT WITH JURORS
After a jury has been discharged, or after a verdict has been returned, or after a mistrial has been declared, a lawyer who participated in the trial, a representative from that lawyer's office, or a law enforcement officer who participated in the trial shall not communicate to the jury information that was suppressed or excluded pursuant to a ruling by the judge in the case.
GR 27
FAMILY LAW COURTHOUSE FACILITATORS
(a) Generally. RCW 26.12.240 and RCW xx.xx.xxx provide a county may create a courthouse facilitator program to provide basic services to pro se litigants in family law and guardianship cases. This Rule applies only to courthouse facilitator programs created pursuant to RCW 26.12.240 or RCW xx.xx.xxx.
(b) The Washington State Supreme Court shall create a Family Courthouse Facilitator Advisory Committee supported by the Administrative Office of the Courts to establish minimum qualifications and develop and administer a curriculum of initial and ongoing training requirements for family law and guardianship courthouse facilitators. The Administrative Office of the Courts shall assist counties in administering family law courthouse facilitator programs.
(c) Definitions. For the purpose of this rule the following definitions apply:
(1) A Family Law Courthouse Facilitator is an individual or individuals who has or have met or exceeded the minimum qualifications and completed the curriculum developed by the Administrative Office of the Courts Courthouse Facilitator Advisory Committee and who is or are providing basic services in family law or guardianship cases in a Superior Court.
(2) Family Law Cases include, but are not limited to, dissolution of marriage, modification of dissolution matters such as child support, parenting plans, non-parental custody or visitation, and parentage by unmarried persons to establish paternity, child support, child custody and visitation.
(3) Guardianship cases include cases filed under RCW 11.88, RCW 11.90, RCW 11.92 and RCW 73.36.
(4) "Basic Service" includes but is not limited to:
a) referral to legal and social service resources, including lawyer referral and alternate dispute referral programs and resources on obtaining family law forms and instructions;
b) assistance in calculating child support using standardized computer based program based on financial information provided by the pro se litigant;
c) processing interpreter requests for facilitator assistance and court hearings;
d) assistance in selection as well as distribution of forms and standardized instructions that have been approved by the court, clerk's office, or the Administrative Office of the Courts;
e) assistance in completing forms that have been approved by the court, clerk's office, or the Administrative Office of the Courts;
f) explanation of legal terms;
g) information on basic court procedures and logistics including requirements for service, filing, scheduling hearings and complying with local procedures;
h) review of completed forms to determine whether forms have been completely filled out but not as to substantive content with respect to the parties' legal rights and obligations;
i) previewing pro se documents prior to hearings for matters such as dissolution of marriage, review hearings, and show cause and temporary relief motions calendars under the direction of the Clerk or Court to determine whether procedural requirements have been complied with;
j) attendance at pro se hearings to assist the Court with pro se matters;
k) assistance with preparation of court orders under the direction of the Court; and
l) preparation of pro se instruction packets under the direction of the Administrative Office of the Courts.
(d) Family Law Courthouse Facilitators shall, whenever reasonably practical, obtain a written and signed disclaimer of attorney-client relationship, attorney-client confidentiality and representation from each person utilizing the services of the Family Law Courthouse Facilitator. The prescribed disclaimer shall be in the format developed by the Administrative Office of the Courts.
(e) No attorney-client relationship or privilege is created, by implication or by inference, between a Family Law Courthouse Facilitator providing basic services under this rule and the users of Family Law Courthouse Facilitator Program services.
(f) Family law Courthouse facilitators providing basic services under this rule are not engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. Upon a courthouse facilitator's voluntary or involuntary termination from a courthouse facilitator program, that person is no longer a courthouse facilitator providing services pursuant to RCW 26.12.240 or RCW xx.xx.xx or this Rule.
[Adopted effective September 1, 2002.]
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 4 (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), (b)(1)(ii), (b)(1)(iii), (b)(2), (c), (d)(4), (d)(5),
(g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), (g)(5), (i)(1)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 4. PROCESS
(a) SummonsIssuance.
(1) The summons must be signed and dated by the plaintiff or the plaintiff's his attorney, and directed to the defendant requiring the defendant him to defend the action and to serve a copy of the defendant's his appearance or defense on the person whose name is signed on the summons.
(2) Unless a statute or rule provides for a different time requirement, the summons shall require the defendant to serve a copy of the defendant's his defense within 20 days after the service of summons, exclusive of the day of service. If a statute or rule other than this rule provides for a different time to serve a defense, that time shall be stated in the summons.
(3) A notice of appearance, if made, shall be in writing, shall be signed by the defendant or the defendant's his attorney, and shall be served upon the person whose name is signed on the summons. In condemnation cases a notice of appearance only shall be served on the person whose name is signed on the petition.
(b) Summons.
(1) Contents. The summons for personal service shall contain:
(ii) A direction to the defendant summoning the defendant him to serve a copy of the defendant's his defense within a time stated in the summons;
(iii) A notice that, in case of failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against the defendant him by default. It shall be signed and dated by the plaintiff, or the plaintiff's his attorney, with the addition of the plaintiff's his post office address, at which the papers in the action may be served on the plaintiff him by mail.
(2) Form. Except in condemnation cases, and except as provided in rule 4.1, the summons for personal service in the state shall be substantially in the following form:
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON
 
 
   FOR [______] COUNTY
_____ 
)
 
___________,
 
 
Plaintiff,      
)
   No. ______
   Summons [20 days]
_____ 
)
 
___________,
 
 
Defendant.    
)
 
 
 
TO THE DEFENDANT: A lawsuit has been started against you in the above entitled court by _________, plaintiff. Plaintiff's claim is stated in the written complaint, a copy of which is served upon you with this summons.
In order to defend against this lawsuit, you must respond to the complaint by stating your defense in writing, and by serving a copy upon the person signing this summons within 20 days after the service of this summons, excluding the day of service, or a default judgment may be entered against you without notice. A default judgment is one where plaintiff is entitled to what she or he asks for because you have not responded. If you serve a notice of appearance on the undersigned person, you are entitled to notice before a default judgment may be entered. You may demand that the plaintiff file this lawsuit with the court. If you do so, the demand must be in writing and must be served upon the person signing this summons. Within 14 days after you serve the demand, the plaintiff must file this lawsuit with the court, or the service on you of this summons and complaint will be void.
If you wish to seek the advice of an attorney in this matter, you should do so promptly so that your written response, if any, may be served on time.
This summons is issued pursuant to rule 4 of the Superior Court Civil Rules of the State of Washington.
[signed] _______________________________
Print or Type Name
( ) Plaintiff ( ) Plaintiff's Attorney
P.O. Address ___________________________
Dated ___________
Telephone
Number _________________________________
(c) By Whom Served. Service of summons and process, except when service is by publication, shall be by the sheriff of the county wherein the service is made, or by the sheriff's his deputy, or by any person over 18 years of age who is competent to be a witness in the action, other than a party. Subpoenas may be served as provided in rule 45.
(d) Service.
(4) Alternative to Service by Publication. In circumstances justifying service by publication, if the serving party files an affidavit stating facts from which the court determines that service by mail is just as likely to give actual notice as service by publication, the court may order that service be made by any person over 18 years of age, who is competent to be a witness, other than a party, by mailing copies of the summons and other process to the party to be served at the party's his last known address or any other address determined by the court to be appropriate. Two copies shall be mailed, postage prepaid, one by ordinary first class mail and the other by a form of mail requiring a signed receipt showing when and to whom it was delivered. The envelopes must bear the return address of the sender. The summons shall contain the date it was deposited in the mail and shall require the defendant to appear and answer the complaint within 90 days from the date of mailing. Service under this subsection has the same jurisdictional effect as service by publication.
(5) Appearance. A voluntary appearance of a defendant does not preclude the defendant's his right to challenge lack of jurisdiction over the defendant's his person, insufficiency of process, or insufficiency of service of process pursuant to rule 12(b).
(g) Return of Service. Proof of service shall be as follows:
(1) If served by the sheriff or the sheriff's his deputy, the return of the sheriff or the sherrif's his deputy endorsed upon or attached to the summons;
(2) If served by any other person, the person's his affidavit of service endorsed upon or attached to the summons; or
(3) If served by publication, the affidavit of the publisher, supervisor foreman, principal clerk, or business manager of the newspaper showing the same, together with a printed copy of the summons as published; or
(5) The written acceptance or admission of the defendant, the defendant's his agent or attorney;
(i) Alternative Provisions for Service in a Foreign Country.
(1) Manner. When a statute or rule authorizes service upon a party not an inhabitant of or found within the state, and service is to be effected upon the party in a foreign country, it is also sufficient if service of the summons and complaint is made: (A) in the manner prescribed by the law of the foreign country for service in that country in an action in any of its courts of general jurisdiction; or (B) as directed by the foreign authority in response to a letter rogatory or a letter of request; or (C) upon an individual, by delivery to the party him personally, and upon a corporation or partnership or association, by delivery to an officer, a managing or general agent; or (D) by any form of mail, requiring a signed receipt, to be addressed and mailed to the party to be served; or (E) pursuant to the means and terms of any applicable treaty or convention; or (F) by diplomatic or consular officers when authorized by the United States Department of State; or (G) as directed by order of the court. Service under (C) or (G) above may be made by any person who is not a party and is not less than 21 years of age or who is designated by order of the court or by the foreign court. The method for service of process in a foreign country must comply with applicable treaties, if any, and must be reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to give actual notice.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 5 (b)(1), (b)(2)(B), (b)(3), (d)(3)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 5. SERVICE AND FILING OF PLEADINGS AND OTHER PAPERS
(b) ServiceHow Made.
(1) On Attorney or Party. Whenever under these rules service is required or permitted to be made upon a party represented by an attorney the service shall be made upon the attorney unless service directly upon the party himself is ordered by the court. Service upon the attorney or upon a party shall be made by delivering a copy to the party or the party's attorney him or by mailing it to the party's or the party's attorney's him at his last known address or, if no address is known, filing with the clerk of the court an affidavit of attempt to serve. Delivery of a copy within this rule means: handing it to the attorney or to the party; or leaving it at the party's or the attorney's his office with a his clerk or other person in charge thereof; or, if there is no one in charge, leaving it in a conspicuous place therein; or, if the office is closed or the person to be served has no office, leaving it at the person's his dwelling house or usual place of abode with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein. Service on an attorney is subject to the restrictions in subsections (b)(4) and (5) of this rule and in rule 71, Withdrawal by Attorneys.
(2) Service by Mail.
(B) Proof of Service by Mail. Proof of service of all papers permitted to be mailed may be by written acknowledgment of service, by affidavit of the person who mailed the papers, or by certificate of an attorney. The certificate of an attorney may be in form substantially as follows:
CERTIFICATE
I certify that I mailed a copy of the foregoing __________ to [here name the person, first name then last name John Smith], [plaintiff's] attorney, at [office address or residence], and to [here name the person, first name then last name Joseph Doe], an additional [defendant's] attorney [or attorneys] at [office address or residence], postage prepaid, on [date].
[here name the person, first name then last name John Brown] Attorney for [Defendant] [here name the person, first name then last name] William Noe
(3) Service on Nonresidents. Where a plaintiff or defendant who has appeared resides outside the state and has no attorney in the action, the service may be made by mail if the party's his residence is known; if not known, on the clerk of the court for the party him. Where a party, whether resident or nonresident, has an attorney in the action, the service of papers shall be upon the attorney instead of the party. If the attorney does not have an office within the state or no longer resides has removed his residence from in the state, the service may be upon the attorney him personally either within or without the state, or by mail to the attorney him at either the attorney's his place of residence or his office, if either is known, and if not known, then by mail upon the party, if the attorney's his residence is known, whether within or without the state. If the residence of neither the party nor the party's his attorney, nor the office address of the attorney is known, an affidavit of the attempt to serve shall be filed with the clerk of the court.
(d) Filing.
(3) Limitation. No sanction shall be imposed if prior to the hearing the pleading or paper other than the complaint is filed and the moving attorney is notified of the filing before the attorney he leaves his the office for the hearing.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 6(e) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 6. TIME
(e) Additional Time After Service by Mail. Whenever a party has the right or is required to do some act or take some proceedings within a prescribed period after the service of a notice or other paper upon the party him and the notice or paper is served upon the party him by mail, 3 days shall be added to the prescribed period.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 8 (a), (b), (e)(2) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 8. GENERAL RULES OF PLEADING
(a) Claims for Relief. A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief, whether an original claim, counterclaim, cross claim, or third party claim, shall contain (1) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief and (2) a demand for judgment for the relief to which the pleader he deems the pleader is himself entitled. Relief in the alternative or of several different types may be demanded.
(b) Defenses; Form of Denials. A party shall state in short and plain terms the his defenses to each claim asserted and shall admit or deny the averments upon which the adverse party relies. If a party he is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of an averment, the party he shall so state and this has the effect of a denial. Denials shall fairly meet the substance of the averments denied. When a pleader intends in good faith to deny only a part or a qualification of an averment, the pleader he shall specify so much of it as is true and material and shall deny only the remainder. Unless the pleader intends in good faith to controvert all the averments of the preceding pleading, the pleader he may make his denials as specific denials of designated averments or paragraphs, or the pleader he may generally deny all the averments except such designated averments or paragraphs as the pleader he expressly admits; but, when the pleader he does so intend to controvert all its averments, the pleader he may do so by general denial subject to the obligations set forth in rule 11.
(e) Pleading to Be Concise and Direct; Consistency.
(2) A party may set forth two or more statements of a claim or defense alternately or hypothetically, either in one count or defense or in separate counts or defenses. When two or more statements are made in the alternative and one of them if made independently would be sufficient, the pleading is not made insufficient by the insufficiency of one or more of the alternative statements. A party may also state as many separate claims or defenses as the party he has regardless of consistency and whether based on legal or on equitable grounds or on both. All statements shall be made subject to the obligations set forth in rule 11.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 9 (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(4)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 9. PLEADING SPECIAL MATTERS
(k) Foreign Law.
(1) United States Jurisdictions. A party who intends to raise an issue concerning the law of a state, territory, or other jurisdiction of the United States shall set forth in the party's his pleading facts which show that the law of another United States jurisdiction may be applicable, or shall state in the party's his pleading or serve other reasonable written notice that the law of another United States jurisdiction may be relied upon.
(2) Other Jurisdictions. A party who intends to raise an issue concerning the law of a jurisdiction other than a state, territory or other jurisdiction of the United States shall give notice in the his pleading of the foreign jurisdiction whose law the party he contends may be applicable to the facts of the case. The following matters need not be pleaded, but may be discovered pursuant to rule 26:
(i) the party's contentions as to which issues of law are governed by the foreign law;
(ii) the substance of such foreign law;
(iii) the expected effect of such foreign law on the legal issues and on the outcome of the case being tried;
(iv) the specific foreign statutes, regulations, judicial and administrative decisions, documents and other nonprivileged written materials and translations thereof upon which the party intends to rely.
(4) Failure to Plead Foreign Law. If no party has requested in his pleadings application of the law of a jurisdiction other than a state, territory or other jurisdiction of the United States, the court at time of trial shall apply the law of the State of Washington unless such application would result in manifest injustice.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 10 (a)(2) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 10. FORM OF PLEADINGS AND OTHER PAPERS
(a) Caption. Every pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the action, the file number if known to the person signing it, and an identification as to the nature of the pleading or other paper.
(2) Unknown Names. When the plaintiff is ignorant of the name of the defendant, it shall be so stated in the plaintiff's his pleading, and such defendant may be designated in any pleading or proceeding by any name, and when the defendant's his true name shall be discovered, the pleading or proceeding may be amended accordingly.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 12 (a)(1), (a)(3), (a)(4), (b), (e), (f), (g)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 12. DEFENSES AND OBJECTIONS
(a) When Presented. A defendant shall serve an his answer within the following periods:
(1) Within 20 days, exclusive of the day of service, after the service of the summons and complaint upon the defendant him pursuant to rule 4;
(3) Within 60 days after the service of the summons upon the defendant him if the summons is served upon the defendant him personally out of the state in accordance with RCW 4.28.180 and 4.28.185 or on the Secretary of State as provided by RCW 46.64.040.
(4) Within the period fixed by any other applicable statutes or rules.
A party served with a pleading stating a cross claim against another party him shall serve an answer thereto within 20 days after the service upon that other party him. The plaintiff shall serve his a reply to a counterclaim in the answer within 20 days after service of the answer or, if a reply is ordered by the court, within 20 days after service of the order, unless the order otherwise directs. The service of a motion permitted under this rule alters these periods of time as follows, unless a different time is fixed by order of the court.
(b) How Presented. Every defense, in law or fact, to a claim for relief in any pleading, whether a claim, counterclaim, cross claim, or third party claim, shall be asserted in the responsive pleading thereto if one is required, except that the following defenses may at the option of the pleader be made by motion: (1) lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, (2) lack of jurisdiction over the person, (3) improper venue, (4) insufficiency of process, (5) insufficiency of service of process, (6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, (7) failure to join a party under rule 19. A motion making any of these defenses shall be made before pleading if a further pleading is permitted. No defense or objection is waived by being joined with one or more other defenses or objections in a responsive pleading or motion. If a pleading sets forth a claim for relief to which the adverse party is not required to serve a responsive pleading, the pleader he may assert at the trial any defense in law or fact to that claim for relief. If, on a motion asserting the defense numbered (6) to dismiss for failure of the pleading to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in rule 56, and all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such a motion by rule 56.
(e) Motion for More Definite Statement. If a pleading to which a responsive pleading is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, or if more particularity in that pleading will further the efficient economical disposition of the action, the party he may move for a more definite statement before interposing a his responsive pleading. The motion shall point out the defects complained of and the details desired. If the motion is granted and the order of the court is not obeyed within 10 days after the notice of the order or within such other time as the court may fix, the court may strike the pleading to which the motion was directed or make such order as it deems just.
(f) Motion to Strike. Upon motion made by a party before responding to a pleading or, if no responsive pleading is permitted by these rules, upon motion made by a party within 20 days after the service of the pleading upon the party him or upon the court's own initiative at any time, the court may order stricken from any pleading any insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.
(g) Consolidation of Defenses in Motion. A party who makes a motion under this rule may join with it any other motions herein provided for and then available to the party him. If a party makes a motion under this rule but omits therefrom any defense or objection then available to the party him which this rule permits to be raised by motion, the party he shall not thereafter make a motion based on the defense or objection so omitted, except a motion as provided in subsection (h)(2) hereof on any of the grounds there stated.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 13 (a), (e), (f), (j) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 13. COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSS CLAIM
(a) Compulsory Counterclaims. A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim and does not require for its adjudication the presence of third parties of whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction. But the pleader need not state the claim if (1) at the time the action was commenced the claim was the subject of another pending action, or (2) the opposing party brought suit upon the pleader's his claim by attachment or other process by which the court did not acquire jurisdiction to render a personal judgment on that claim, and the pleader is not stating any counterclaim under this rule.
(e) Counterclaim Maturing or Acquired After Pleading. A claim which either matured or was acquired by the pleader after serving the his pleading may, with the permission of the court, be presented as a counterclaim by supplemental pleading.
(f) Omitted Counterclaim. When a pleader fails to set up a counterclaim through oversight, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, or when justice requires, the pleader he may by leave of court set up the counterclaim by amendment.
(j) Setoff Against Assignee. The defendant in a civil action upon a contract express or implied, other than upon a negotiable promissory note or bill of exchange, negotiated in good faith and without notice before due, which has been assigned to the plaintiff, may set off a demand of a like nature existing against the person to whom the defendant he was originally liable, or any assignee prior to the plaintiff, of such contract, provided such demand existed at the time of the assignment thereof, and belonging to the defendant in good faith, before notice of such assignment, and was such a demand as might have been set off against such person to whom the defendant he was originally liable, or such assignee while the contract belonged to the defendant him..
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 14 (a) (b) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 14. THIRD PARTY PRACTICE
(a) When Defendant May Bring in Third Party. At any time after commencement of the action a defending party, as a third party plaintiff, may cause a summons and complaint to be served upon a person not a party to the action who is or may be liable to the defending party him for all or part of the plaintiff's claim against the defending party. him. The third party plaintiff need not obtain leave to make the service if the third party plaintiff he files the third party complaint not later than 10 days after the third party plaintiff he serves an his original answer. Otherwise the third party plaintiff he must obtain leave on motion upon notice to all parties to the action. The person served with the summons and third party complaint, hereinafter called the third party defendant, shall make his defenses to the third party plaintiff's claim as provided in rule 12 and his counterclaims against the third party plaintiff and cross claims against other third party defendants as provided in rule 13. The third party defendant may assert against the plaintiff any defenses which the third party plaintiff has to the plaintiff's claim. The third party defendant may also assert any claim against the plaintiff arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the plaintiff's claim against the third party plaintiff. The plaintiff may assert any claim against the third party defendant arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the plaintiff's claim against the third party plaintiff, and the third party defendant thereupon shall assert his defenses as provided in rule 12 and his counterclaims and cross-claims as provided in rule 13. Any party may move to strike the third party claim, or for its severance or separate trial. A third party defendant may proceed under this rule against any person not a party to the action who is or may be liable to the third party defendant him for all or part of the claim made in the action against the third party defendant.
(b) When Plaintiff May Bring in Third Party. When a counterclaim is asserted against a plaintiff, the plaintiff he may cause a third party to be brought in under circumstances which under this rule would entitle a defendant to do so.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 15 (c), (d) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 15. AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS
(c) Relation Back of Amendments. Whenever the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date of the original pleading. An amendment changing the party against whom a claim is asserted relates back if the foregoing provision is satisfied and, within the period provided by law for commencing the action against the original party him, the party to be brought in by amendment (1) has received such notice of the institution of the action that the new party he will not be prejudiced in maintaining her or his defense on the merits, and (2) knew or should have known that, but for a mistake concerning the identity of the proper party, the action would have been brought against the new party him.
(d) Supplemental Pleadings. Upon motion of a party the court may, upon reasonable notice and upon such terms as are just, permit the party him to serve a supplemental pleading setting forth transactions or occurrences or events which have happened since the date of the pleading sought to be supplemented. Permission may be granted even though the original pleading is defective in its statement of a claim for relief or defense. If the court deems it advisable that the adverse party plead to the supplemental pleading, it shall so order, specifying the time therefor.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 17(a) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 17. PARTIES PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT; CAPACITY
(a) Real Party in Interest. Every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest. An executor, administrator, guardian, bailee, trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party authorized by statute may sue in the party's his own name without joining with him the party for whose benefit the action is brought. No action shall be dismissed on the ground that it is not prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest until a reasonable time has been allowed after objection for ratification of commencement of the action by, or joinder or substitution of, the real party in interest; and such ratification, joinder, or substitution shall have the same effect as if the action had been commenced in the name of the real party in interest.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 18 (a), (b) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 18. JOINDER OF CLAIMS AND REMEDIES
(a) Joinder of Claims. A party asserting a claim to relief as an original claim, counterclaim, cross claim, or third party claim, may join, either as independent or as alternate claims, as many claims, legal, equitable, or maritime, as the party he has against an opposing party.
(b) Joinder of Remedies; Fraudulent Conveyances. Whenever a claim is one heretofore cognizable only after another claim has been prosecuted to a conclusion, the two claims may be joined in a single action; but the court shall grant relief in that action only in accordance with the relative substantive rights of the parties. In particular, a plaintiff may state a claim for money and a claim to have set aside a conveyance fraudulent as to the plaintiff him, without first having obtained a judgment establishing the claim for money.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 19 (a), (b), (e) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 19. JOINDER OF PERSONS NEEDED FOR JUST ADJUDICATION
(a) Persons to Be Joined if Feasible. A person who is subject to service of process and whose joinder will not deprive the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action shall be joined as a party in the action if (1) in the person's his absence complete relief cannot be accorded among those already parties, or (2) the person he claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated that the disposition of the action in the person's his absence may (A) as a practical matter impair or impede the person's his ability to protect that interest or (B) leave any of the persons already parties subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations by reason of the person's his claimed interest. If the person he has not been so joined, the court shall order that the person he be made a party. If the person he should join as a plaintiff but refuses to do so, the person he may be made a defendant, or, in a proper case, an involuntary plaintiff. If the joined party objects to venue and the person's his joinder would render the venue of the action improper, the joined party he shall be dismissed from the action.
(b) Determination by Court Whenever Joinder Not Feasible. If a person joinable under (1) or (2) of section (a) hereof cannot be made a party, the court shall determine whether in equity and good conscience the action should proceed among the parties before it, or should be dismissed, the absent person being thus regarded as indispensable. The factors to be considered by the court include: (1) to what extent a judgment rendered in the person's absence might be prejudicial to the person him or those already parties; (2) the extent to which, by protective provisions in the judgment, by the shaping of relief, or other measures, the prejudice can be lessened or avoided; (3) whether a judgment rendered in the person's absence will be adequate; (4) whether the plaintiff will have an adequate remedy if the action is dismissed for nonjoinder.
(e) Spouse or Domestic Partner Husband and Wife Must JoinExceptions. [Reserved. See RCW 4.08.030.]
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 20 (b), (c), (d)(1), (d)(2)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 20. PERMISSIVE JOINDER OF PARTIES
(b) Separate Trials. The court may make such orders as will prevent a party from being embarrassed, delayed, or put to expense by the inclusion of a party against whom the party he asserts no claim and who asserts no claim against the party him, and may order separate trials or make other orders to prevent delay or prejudice.
(c) When Either Spouse or Either Domestic Partner Husband and Wife May Join.
[Reserved. See RCW 4.08.040.]
(d) Service on Joint Defendants; Procedure After Service. When the action is against two or more defendants and the summons is served on one or more but not on all of them, the plaintiff may proceed as follows:
(1) If the action is against the defendants jointly indebted upon a contract, the plaintiff he may proceed against the defendants served unless the court otherwise directs; and if the plaintiff he recovers judgment it may be entered against all the defendants thus jointly indebted so far only as it may be enforced against the joint property of all and the separate property of the defendants served.
(2) If the action is against defendants severally liable, the plaintiff he may proceed against the defendants served in the same manner as if they were the only defendants.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 22(a) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 22. INTERPLEADER
(a) Rule. Persons having claims against the plaintiff may be joined as defendants and required to interplead when their claims are such that the plaintiff is or may be exposed to double or multiple liability. It is not ground for objection to the joinder that the claims of the several claimants or the titles on which their claims depend do not have a common origin or are not identical but are adverse to and independent of one another, or that the plaintiff avers that the plaintiff he is not liable in whole or in part to any or all of the claimants. A defendant exposed to similar liability may obtain such interpleader by way of cross claim or counterclaim. The provisions of this rule supplement and do not in any way limit the joinder of parties permitted under other rules and statutes.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 23.1 OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 23.1. DERIVATIVE ACTIONS BY SHAREHOLDERS
In a derivative action brought by one or more shareholders or members to enforce a right of a corporation or of an unincorporated association, the corporation or association having failed to enforce a right which may properly be asserted by it, the complaint shall be verified and shall allege (a) that the plaintiff was a shareholder or member at the time of the transaction of which the plaintiff he complains or that the plaintiff's his share or membership thereafter devolved on the plaintiff him by operation of law, and (b) that the action is not a collusive one to confer jurisdiction on a court of this state which it would not otherwise have. The complaint shall also allege with particularity the efforts, if any, made by the plaintiff to obtain the action the plaintiff he desires from the directors or comparable authority and, if necessary, from the shareholders or members, and the reasons for the plaintiff's his failure to obtain the action or for not making the effort. The derivative action may not be maintained if it appears that the plaintiff does not fairly and adequately represent the interests of the shareholders or members similarly situated in enforcing the right of the corporation or association. The action shall not be dismissed or compromised without the approval of the court, and notice of the proposed dismissal or compromise shall be given to shareholders or members in such manner as the court directs.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 23 (c)(2) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 23. CLASS ACTIONS
(c) Determination by Order Whether Class Action to Be Maintained; Notice; Judgment; Actions Conducted Partially as Class Actions.
(2) In any class action maintained under subsection (b)(3), the court shall direct to the members of the class the best notice practicable under the circumstances, including individual notice to all members who can be identified through reasonable effort. The notice shall advise each member that (A) the court will exclude the member him from the class if the member he so requests by a specified date; (B) the judgment, whether favorable or not, will include all members who do not request exclusion; and (C) any member who does not request exclusion may, if the member he desires, enter an appearance through his counsel.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 24(a) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 24. INTERVENTION
(a) Intervention of Right. Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action: (1) when a statute confers an unconditional right to intervene; or (2) when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and the person he is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the person's his ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant's interest is adequately represented by existing parties.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 25(b) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 25. SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES
(b) Incompetency. If a party becomes incompetent, the court upon motion served as provided in section (a) of this rule may allow the action to be continued by or against the party's his representative.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 26 (b)(4), (e), (e)(1), (e)(2), (f), (g)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 26. GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISCOVERY
(b) Discovery Scope and Limits. Unless otherwise limited by order of the court in accordance with these rules, the scope of discovery is as follows:
(4) Trial Preparation: Materials. Subject to the provisions of subsection (b)(5) of this rule, a party may obtain discovery of documents and tangible things otherwise discoverable under subsection (b)(1) of this rule and prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for another party or by or for that other party's representative (including a party's his attorney, consultant, surety, indemnitor, insurer, or agent) only upon a showing that the party seeking discovery has substantial need of the materials in the preparation of such party's his case and that the party he is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials by other means. In ordering discovery of such materials when the required showing has been made, the court shall protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or other representative of a party concerning the litigation.
(e) Supplementation of Responses. A party who has responded to a request for discovery with a response that was complete when made is under no duty to supplement the his response to include information thereafter acquired, except as follows:
(1) A party is under a duty seasonably to supplement his response with respect to any question directly addressed to (A) the identity and location of persons having knowledge of discoverable matters, and (B) the identity of each person expected to be called as an expert witness at trial, the subject matter on which the expert witness he is expected to testify, and the substance of the expert witness's his testimony.
(2) A party is under a duty seasonably to amend a prior response if the party he obtains information upon the basis of which (A) the party he knows that the response was incorrect when made, or (B) the party he knows that the response though correct when made is no longer true and the circumstances are such that a failure to amend the response is in substance a knowing concealment.
(f) Discovery Conference. At any time after commencement of an action the court may direct the attorneys for the parties to appear before it for a conference on the subject of discovery. The court shall do so upon motion by the attorney for any party if the motion includes:
(1) A statement of the issues as they then appear;
(2) A proposed plan and schedule of discovery;
(3) Any limitations proposed to be placed on discovery;
(4) Any other proposed orders with respect to discovery; and
(5) A statement showing that the attorney making the motion has made a reasonable effort to reach agreement with opposing attorneys on the matters set forth in the motion.
Each party and each party's his attorney are under a duty to participate in good faith in the framing of a discovery plan if a plan is proposed by the attorney for any party.
Notice of the motion shall be served on all parties. Objections or additions to matters set forth in the motion shall be served not later than 10 days after service of the motion.
Following the discovery conference, the court shall enter an order tentatively identifying the issues for discovery purposes, establishing a plan and schedule for discovery, setting limitations on discovery, if any, and determining such other matters, including the allocation of expenses, as are necessary for the proper management of discovery in the action. An order may be altered or amended whenever justice so requires.
Subject to the right of a party who properly moves for a discovery conference to prompt convening of the conference, the court may combine the discovery conference with a pretrial conference authorized by rule 16.
(g) Signing of Discovery Requests, Responses, and Objections. Every request for discovery or response or objection thereto made by a party represented by an attorney shall be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's his individual name, whose address shall be stated. A party who is not represented by an attorney shall sign the request, response, or objection and state the party's his address. The signature of the attorney or party constitutes a certification that the attorney or the party he has read the request, response, or objection, and that to the best of their his knowledge, information, and belief formed after a reasonable inquiry it is: (1) consistent with these rules and warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; (2) not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; and (3) not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case, the discovery already had in the case, the amount in controversy, and the importance of the issues at stake in the litigation. If a request, response, or objection is not signed, it shall be stricken unless it is signed promptly after the omission is called to the attention of the party making the request, response, or objection and a party shall not be obligated to take any action with respect to it until it is signed.
If a certification is made in violation of the rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, shall impose upon the person who made the certification, the party on whose behalf the request, response, or objection is made, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred because of the violation, including a reasonable attorney fee.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 27 (a)(1), (a)(1)(B), (a)(1)(C), (a)(1)(D), (a)(1)(E), (b)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 27. PERPETUATION OF TESTIMONY
(a) Perpetuation Before Action.
(1) Petition. A person who desires to perpetuate one's his own testimony or that of another person regarding any matter that may be cognizable in any superior court may file a verified petition in the superior court in the county of the residence of any expected adverse party. The petition shall be entitled in the name of the petitioner and shall show:
(B) the subject matter of the expected action and the petitioner's his interest therein;
(C) the facts which the petitioner he desires to establish by the proposed testimony and the his reasons for desiring to perpetuate it;
(D) the names or a description of the persons the petitioner he expects will be adverse parties and their addresses so far as known; and
(E) the names and addresses of the persons to be examined and the substance of the testimony which the petitioner he expects to elicit from each, and shall ask for an order authorizing the petitioner to take the depositions of the persons to be examined named in the petition, for the purpose of perpetuating their testimony.
(b) Perpetuation Pending Appeal. If an appeal has been taken from a judgment of a superior court or before the taking of an appeal if the time therefor has not expired, the superior court in which the judgment was rendered may allow the taking of the depositions of witnesses to perpetuate their testimony for use in the event of further proceedings in the superior court. In such case the party who desires to perpetuate the testimony may make a motion in the superior court for leave to take the depositions, upon the same notice and service thereof as if the action was pending in the superior court. The motion shall show (1) the names and addresses of the persons to be examined and the substance of the testimony which the party he expects to elicit from each; (2) the reasons for perpetuating their testimony. If the court finds that the perpetuation of the testimony is proper to avoid a failure or delay of justice, it may make an order allowing the depositions to be taken and may make orders of the character provided for by rules 34 and 35, and thereupon the depositions may be taken and used in the same manner and under the same conditions as are prescribed in these rules for depositions taken in actions pending in the superior court.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 28(b) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 28. PERSONS BEFORE WHOM DEPOSITIONS MAY BE TAKEN
(b) In Foreign Countries. In a foreign country, depositions may be taken (1) on notice before a person authorized to administer oaths in the place in which the examination is held, either by the law thereof or by the law of the United States, or (2) before a person commissioned by the court, and the person so commissioned shall have the power by virtue of the person's his commission to administer any necessary oath and take testimony, or (3) pursuant to a letter rogatory or a letter of request, or (4) pursuant to the means and terms of any applicable treaty or convention. A commission, a letter rogatory, or a letter of request shall be issued on application and notice, and on terms that are just and appropriate. It is not requisite to the issuance of a commission, a letter rogatory, or a letter of request that the taking of the deposition in any other manner is impracticable or inconvenient; and a commission, a letter rogatory, and a letter of request may all be issued in proper cases. A notice or commission may designate the person before whom the deposition is to be taken either by name or by descriptive title. A letter rogatory may be addressed "To the Appropriate Authority in [here name the country]." A letter of request or any other device permitted by any applicable treaty or convention shall be styled in the form prescribed by that treaty or convention. Evidence obtained in response to a letter rogatory or a letter of request need not be excluded merely for the reason that it is not a verbatim transcript or that the testimony was not taken under oath or for any similar departure from the requirements for depositions taken within the United States under these rules.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 30 (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(4), (b)(6), (b)(7), (c), (g)(1), (g)(2)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 30. DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION
(b) Notice of Examination: General Requirements; Special Notice; Nonstenographic Recording; Production of Documents and Things; Deposition of Organization; Video Tape Recording.
(1) A party desiring to take the deposition of any person upon oral examination shall give reasonable notice in writing of not less than 5 days (exclusive of the day of service, Saturdays, Sundays and court holidays) to every other party to the action and to the deponent, if not a party or a managing agent of a party. Notice to a deponent who is not a party or a managing agent of a party may be given by mail or by any means reasonably likely to provide actual notice. The notice shall state the time and place for taking the deposition and the name and address of each person to be examined, if known, and, if the name is not known, a general description sufficient to identify the deponent him or the particular class or group to which the deponent he belongs. If a subpoena duces tecum is to be served on the person to be examined, the designation of the materials to be produced as set forth in the subpoena shall be attached to or included in the notice. A party seeking to compel the attendance of a deponent who is not a party or a managing agent of a party must serve a subpoena on that deponent in accordance with rule 45. Failure to give 5 days' notice to a deponent who is not a party or a managing agent of a party may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions in favor of the deponent, but shall not constitute grounds for quashing the subpoena.
(2) Leave of court is not required for the taking of a deposition by plaintiff if the notice (A) states that the person to be examined is about to go out of the state and will be unavailable for examination unless the person's his deposition is taken before expiration of the 30-day period, and (B) sets forth facts to support the statement. The plaintiff's attorney shall sign the notice, and the attorney's his signature constitutes a certification by the attorney him that to the best of his the attorney's knowledge, information, and belief the statement and supporting facts are true. The sanctions provided by rule 11 are applicable to the certification.
If a party shows that when the party he was served with notice under this subsection (b)(2) the party he was unable through the exercise of diligence to obtain counsel to represent her or him at the taking of the deposition, the deposition may not be used against the party him.
(4) The parties may stipulate in writing or the court may upon motion order that the testimony at a deposition be recorded by other than stenographic means. The stipulation or the order shall designate the person before whom the deposition shall be taken, the manner of recording, preserving, and filing the deposition, and may include other provisions to assure that the recorded testimony will be accurate and trustworthy. A party may arrange to have a stenographic transcription made at the party's his own expense. Any objections under section (c), any changes made by the witness, the witness's his signature identifying the deposition as the witness's own or the statement of the officer that is required if the witness does not sign, as provided in section (e), and the certification of the officer required by section (f) shall be set forth in a writing to accompany a deposition recorded by nonstenographic means.
(6) A party may in a his notice and in a subpoena name as the deponent a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency and designate with reasonable particularity the matters on which examination is requested. In that event the organization so named shall designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or other persons who consent to testify on its behalf, and may set forth, for each person designated, the matters known on which the deponent he will testify. A subpoena shall advise a nonparty organization of its duty to make such a designation. The persons so designated shall testify as to the matters known or reasonably available to the organization. This subsection (b)(6) does not preclude taking a deposition by any other procedure authorized in these rules.
(7) The parties may stipulate in writing or the court may upon motion order that a deposition be taken by telephone or by other electronic means. For the purposes of this rule and rules 28(a), 37 (a)(1), 37 (b)(1), and 45(d), a deposition taken by telephone or by other electronic means is taken at the place where the deponent is to answer the propounded questions. propounded to him.
(c) Examination and Cross Examination; Record of Examination; Oath; Objections.
Examination and cross examination of witnesses may proceed as permitted at the trial under the provisions of the Washington Rules of Evidence (ER). The officer before whom the deposition is to be taken shall put the witness on oath and shall personally, or by someone acting under the officer's direction and in the officer's presence, record the testimony of the witness. The testimony shall be taken stenographically or recorded by any other means ordered in accordance with subsection (b)(4) of this rule. If requested by one of the parties, the testimony shall be transcribed.
All objections made at the time of the examination to the qualifications of the officer taking the deposition, or to the manner of taking it, or to the evidence presented, or to the conduct of any party, and any other objection to the proceedings, shall be noted by the officer upon the deposition. Evidence objected to shall be taken subject to the objections. A judge of the superior court, or a special master if one is appointed pursuant to rule 53.3, may make telephone rulings on objections made during depositions. In lieu of participating in the oral examination, parties may serve written questions in a sealed envelope on the party taking the deposition and the party he shall transmit them to the officer, who shall propound them to the witness and record the answers verbatim.
(g) Failure to Attend or to Serve Subpoena; Expenses.
(1) If the party giving the notice of the taking of a deposition fails to attend and proceed therewith and another party attends in person or by attorney pursuant to the notice, the court may order the party giving the notice to pay to such other party the reasonable expenses incurred by such other party him and such other party's his attorney in attending, including reasonable attorney fees.
(2) If the party giving the notice of the taking of a deposition of a witness fails to serve a subpoena upon the witness him and the witness because of such failure does not attend, and if another party attends in person or by attorney because such party he expects the deposition of that witness to be taken, the court may order the party giving the notice to pay to such other party the reasonable expenses incurred by such other party him and such other party's his attorney in attending, including reasonable attorney fees.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 31(a) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 31. DEPOSITIONS UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS
(a) Serving Questions; Notice. After the summons and a copy of the complaint are served, or the complaint is filed, whichever shall first occur, any party may take the testimony of any person, including a party, by deposition upon written questions. The attendance of witnesses may be compelled by the use of subpoena as provided in rule 45. The deposition of a person confined in prison may be taken only by leave of court on such terms as the court prescribes.
A party desiring to take a deposition upon written questions shall serve them upon every other party with a notice stating (1) the name and address of the person who is to answer them, if known, and if the name is not known, a general description sufficient to identify the person him or the particular class or group to which the person he belongs, and (2) the name or descriptive title and address of the officer before whom the deposition is to be taken. A deposition upon written questions may be taken of a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency in accordance with the provisions of rule 30 (b)(6).
Within 15 days after the notice and written questions are served, a party may serve cross questions upon all other parties. Within 10 days after being served with cross questions, a party may serve redirect questions upon all other parties. Within 10 days after being served with redirect questions, a party may serve recross questions upon all other parties. The court may for cause shown enlarge or shorten the time.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 32 (a)(4), (c) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 32. USE OF DEPOSITIONS IN COURT PROCEEDINGS
(a) Use of Depositions.
(4) If only part of a deposition is offered in evidence by a party, an adverse party may require the party him to introduce any other part which ought in fairness to be considered with the part introduced, and any party may introduce any other parts.
(c) Effect of Taking or Using Depositions. A party does not make a person the party's his own witness for any purpose by taking the person's his deposition. The introduction in evidence of the deposition or any part thereof for any purpose other than that of contradicting or impeaching the deponent makes the deponent the witness of the party introducing the deposition, but this shall not apply to the use by an adverse party of a deposition under subsection (a)(2) of this rule. At the trial or hearing any party may rebut any relevant evidence contained in a deposition whether introduced by the party him or by any other party.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 36 (a), (b) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 36. REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
(a) Request for Admission. A party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of rule 26(b) set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Copies of documents shall be served with the request unless they have been or are otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after the summons and a copy of the complaint are served upon the defendant, or the complaint is filed, whichever shall first occur, and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon that party. Requests for admission shall not be combined in the same document with any other form of discovery.
Each matter of which an admission is requested shall be separately set forth. The matter is admitted unless, within 30 days after service of the request, or within such shorter or longer time as the court may allow, the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission a written answer or objection addressed to the matter, signed by the party or by the party's his attorney, but, unless the court shortens the time, a defendant shall not be required to serve answers or objections before the expiration of 40 days after service of the summons and complaint upon the defendant him. If objection is made, the reasons therefor shall be stated. The answer shall specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail the reasons why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. A denial shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and when good faith requires that a party qualify an his answer or deny only a part of the matter of which an admission is requested, the party he shall specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder. An answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless the answering party he states that the answering party he has made reasonable inquiry and that the information known or readily obtainable by the answering party him is insufficient to enable the answering party him to admit or deny. A party who considers that a matter of which an admission has been requested presents a genuine issue for trial or a central fact in dispute may not, on that ground alone, object to the request; a party he may, subject to the provisions of rule 37(c), deny the matter or set forth reasons why the party he cannot admit or deny it.
The party who has requested the admissions may move to determine the sufficiency of the answers or objections. Unless the court determines that an objection is justified, it shall order that an answer be served. If the court determines that an answer does not comply with the requirements of this rule, it may order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served. The court may, in lieu of these orders, determine that final disposition of the request be made at a pretrial conference or at a designated time prior to trial. The provisions of rule 37 (a)(4) apply to the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion.
(b) Effect of Admission. Any matter admitted under this rule is conclusively established unless the court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission. Subject to the provisions of rule 16 governing amendment of a pretrial order, the court may permit withdrawal or amendment when the presentation of the merits of the action will be subserved thereby and the party who obtained the admission fails to satisfy the court that withdrawal or amendment will prejudice the party him in maintaining an his action or defense on the merits. Any admission made by a party under this rule is for the purpose of the pending action only and is not an admission by the party him for any other purpose nor may it be used against the party him in any other proceeding.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO RULE
37 (a)(2), (b)(2)(B), (b)(2)(E), (c), (e)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 37. FAILURE TO MAKE DISCOVERY: SANCTIONS
(a) Motion for Order Compelling Discovery. A party, upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby, and upon a showing of compliance with rule 26(i), may apply to the court in the county where the deposition was taken, or in the county where the action is pending, for an order compelling discovery as follows:
(2) Motion. If a deponent fails to answer a question propounded or submitted under rules 30 or 31, or a corporation or other entity fails to make a designation under rule 30 (b)(6) or 31(a), or a party fails to answer an interrogatory submitted under rule 33, or if a party, in response to a request for inspection submitted under rule 34, fails to respond that inspection will be permitted as requested or fails to permit inspection as requested, any party may move for an order compelling an answer or a designation, or an order compelling inspection in accordance with the request. When taking a deposition on oral examination, the proponent of the question may complete or adjourn the examination before the proponent he applies for an order.
If the court denies the motion in whole or in part, it may make such protective order as it would have been empowered to make on a motion made pursuant to rule 26(c).
(b) Failure to Comply With Order.
(2) Sanctions by Court in Which Action Is Pending. If a party or an officer, director, or managing agent of a party or a person designated under rule 30 (b)(6) or 31(a) to testify on behalf of a party fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, including an order made under section (a) of this rule or rule 35, or if a party fails to obey an order entered under rule 26(f), the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others the following:
(B) An order refusing to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims or defenses, or prohibiting the disobedient party him from introducing designated matters in evidence;
(E) Where a party has failed to comply with an order under rule 35(a) requiring the party him to produce another for examination such orders as are listed in sections (A), (B), and (C) of this subsection, unless the party failing to comply shows that the party he is unable to produce such person for examination.
(c) Expenses on Failure to Admit. If a party fails to admit the genuineness of any document or the truth of any matter as requested under rule 36, and if the party requesting the admissions thereafter proves the genuineness of the document or the truth of the matter, the party he may apply to the court for an order requiring the other party to pay the requesting party him the reasonable expenses incurred in making that proof, including reasonable attorney fees. The court shall make the order unless it finds that (1) the request was held objectionable pursuant to rule 36(a), or (2) the admission sought was of no substantial importance, or (3) the party failing to admit had reasonable ground to believe the fact was not true or the document was not genuine, or (4) there was other good reason for the failure to admit.
(e) Failure to Participate in the Framing of a Discovery Plan. If a party or a party's his attorney fails to participate in good faith in the framing of a discovery plan by agreement as is required by rule 26(f), the court may, after opportunity for hearing, require such party or such party's his attorney to pay to any other party the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, caused by the failure.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 38 (c), (d) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 38. JURY TRIAL OF RIGHT
(c) Specification of Issues. In his demand A party may specify the issues which the party he wishes so tried in a demand; otherwise the party he shall be deemed to have demanded trial by jury for all the issues so triable. If a party he has demanded trial by jury for only some of the issues, any other party within 10 days after service of the demand or such lesser time as the court may order, may serve a demand for trial by jury of any other or all of the issues of fact in the action.
(d) Waiver of Jury. The failure of a party to serve a demand as required by this rule, to file it as required by this rule, and to pay the jury fee required by law in accordance with this rule, constitutes a waiver by the party him of trial by jury. A demand for trial by jury made as herein provided may not be withdrawn without the consent of the parties.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 40 (a)(4), (a)(5) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 40. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
(a) Notice of TrialNote of Issue.
(4) Filing Note by Opposite Party. The party upon whom notice of trial is served may file the note of issue and cause the action to be placed upon the calendar without further notice on by the served party. his part.
(5) Issue May Be Brought to Trial by Either Party. Either party, after the notice of trial, whether given by either party himself or the adverse party, may bring the issue to trial, and in the absence of the adverse party, unless the court for good cause otherwise directs, may proceed with the his case, and take a dismissal of the action, or a verdict or judgment, as the case may require.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 41 (a)(1)(B), (a)(2), (a)(3), (b)(3)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 41. DISMISSAL OF ACTIONS
(a) Voluntary Dismissal.
(1) Mandatory. Subject to the provisions of rules 23(e) and 23.1, any action shall be dismissed by the court:
(B) By Plaintiff Before Resting. Upon motion of the plaintiff at any time before plaintiff rests at the conclusion of plaintiff's his opening case.
(2) Permissive. After plaintiff rests after plaintiff's his opening case, plaintiff may move for a voluntary dismissal without prejudice upon good cause shown and upon such terms and conditions as the court deems proper.
(3) Counterclaim. If a counterclaim has been pleaded by a defendant prior to the service upon the defendant him of plaintiff's motion for dismissal, the action shall not be dismissed against the defendant's objection unless the counterclaim can remain pending for independent adjudication by the court.
(b) Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or of any claim against him or her.
(3) Defendant's Motion After Plaintiff Rests. After the plaintiff, in an action tried by the court without a jury, has completed the presentation of his evidence, the defendant, without waiving his the right to offer evidence in the event the motion is not granted, may move for a dismissal on the ground that upon the facts and the law the plaintiff has shown no right to relief. The court as trier of the facts may then determine them and render judgment against the plaintiff or may decline to render any judgment until the close of all the evidence. If the court renders judgment on the merits against the plaintiff, the court shall make findings as provided in rule 52(a). Unless the court in its order for dismissal otherwise specifies, a dismissal under this subsection and any dismissal not provided for in this rule, other than a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, for improper venue, or for failure to join a party under rule 19, operates as an adjudication upon the merits.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 43 (f)(3), (f)(3)(A), (g), (j)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 43. TAKING OF TESTIMONY
(f) Adverse Party as Witness.
(3) Refusal to Attend and Testify; Penalties. If a party or a managing agent refuses to attend and testify before the officer designated to take the party's his deposition or at the trial after notice served as prescribed in rule 30 (b)(1), the complaint, answer, or reply of the party may be stricken and judgment taken against the party, and the contumacious party or managing agent may also be proceeded against as in other cases of contempt. This rule shall not be construed:
(A) to compel any person to answer any question where such answer might tend to be incriminating. him;
(g) Attorney as Witness. If any attorney offers to be himself as a witness on behalf of the attorney's his client and gives evidence on the merits, the attorney he shall not argue the case to the jury, unless by permission of the court.
(j) Report of Proceedings in Retrial of Nonjury Cases. In the event a cause has been remanded by the court for a new trial or the taking of further testimony, and such cause shall have been tried without a jury, and the testimony in such cause shall have been taken in full and used as the report of proceedings upon review, either party upon the retrial of such cause or the taking of further testimony therein shall have the right, provided the court shall so order after an application on 10 days' notice to the opposing party or parties, to submit said report of proceedings as the testimony in said cause upon its second hearing, to the same effect as if the witnesses called by either party him in the earlier hearing had been called, sworn, and testified in the further hearing; but no party shall be denied the right to submit other or further testimony upon such retrial or further hearing, and the party having the right of cross examination shall have the privilege of subpoenaing any witness whose testimony is contained in such report of proceedings for further cross examination.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 44.1(a) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 44.1. DETERMINATION OF FOREIGN LAW
(a) Pleading. A party who intends to raise an issue concerning the law of a state, territory, or other jurisdiction of the United States, or a foreign country shall give notice in the party's his pleadings in accordance with rule 9(k).
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 46 OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 46. EXCEPTIONS UNNECESSARY
Formal exceptions to rulings or orders of the court are unnecessary; but for all purposes for which an exception has heretofore been necessary it is sufficient that a party, at the time the ruling or order of the court is made or sought, makes known to the court the action which the party he desires the court to take or the party's his objection to the action of the court and his grounds therefor; and, if a party has no opportunity to object to a ruling or order at the time it is made, the absence of an objection does not thereafter prejudice the party him.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 47 (i)(2) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 47. JURORS
(i) Care of Jury While Deliberating.
(2) Communication Restricted. Unless the jury is allowed to separate, the jurors shall be kept together under the charge of one or more officers until they agree upon their verdict or are discharged by the court. The officer shall keep the jurors separate from other persons and shall not allow any communication which may affect the case to be made to the jurors, nor make any such communication, himself, unless by order of the court, except to ask the jurors if they have agreed upon their verdict. The officer shall not, before the verdict is rendered, communicate to any person the state of the jurors' deliberations or their verdict.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 49(a) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 49. VERDICTS
(a) Special Verdict. The court may require a jury to return only a special verdict in the form of a special written finding upon each issue of fact. In that event the court may submit to the jury written questions susceptible of categorical or other brief answer or may submit written forms of the several special findings which might properly be made under the pleadings and evidence; or it may use such other method of submitting the issues and requiring the written findings thereon as it deems most appropriate. The court shall give to the jury such explanation and instruction concerning the matter thus submitted as may be necessary to enable the jury to make its findings upon each issue. If in so doing the court omits any issue of fact raised by the pleadings or by the evidence, each party waives his the rights to a trial by jury of the issue so omitted unless before the jury retires that party he demands its submission to the jury. As to an issue omitted without such demand the court may make a finding; or, if it fails to do so, it shall be deemed to have made a finding in accord with the judgment on the special verdict.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 51 (d)(1), (f) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 51. INSTRUCTIONS TO JURY AND DELIBERATION
(d) Published Instructions.
(1) Request. Any instruction appearing in the Washington Pattern Instructions (WPI) may be requested by counsel who must submit the proper number of copies of the requested instruction, identified by number as in section (c) of this rule, in the form counsel he wishes it read to the jury. If the instruction in WPI allows or provides for a choice of wording by the use of brackets or otherwise, the written requested instruction shall use the choice of wording which is being requested.
(f) Objections to Instruction. Before instructing the jury, the court shall supply counsel with copies of its proposed instructions which shall be numbered. Counsel shall then be afforded an opportunity in the absence of the jury to make objections to the giving of any instruction and to the refusal to give a requested instruction. The objector shall state distinctly the matter to which counsel he objects and the grounds of counsel's his objection, specifying the number, paragraph or particular part of the instruction to be given or refused and to which objection is made.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 54 (c), (e) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 54. JUDGMENT AND COSTS
(c) Demand for Judgment. A judgment by default shall not be different in kind from or exceed in amount that prayed for in the demand for judgment. Except as to a party against whom a judgment is entered by default, every final judgment shall grant the relief to which the party in whose favor it is rendered is entitled, even if the party has not demanded such relief in her or his pleadings.
(e) Preparation of Order or Judgment. The attorney of record for the prevailing party shall prepare and present a proposed form of order or judgment not later than 15 days after the entry of the verdict or decision, or at any other time as the court may direct. Where the prevailing party is represented by an attorney of record, no order or judgment may be entered for the prevailing party unless presented or approved by the attorney of record. If both the prevailing party and the prevailing party's his attorney of record fail to prepare and present the form of order or judgment within the prescribed time, any other party may do so, without the approval of the attorney of record of the prevailing party upon notice of presentation as provided in subsection (f)(2).
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 55 (a)(2), (b)(1), (b)(3)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 55. DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT
(a) Entry of Default.
(2) Pleading After Default. Any party may respond to any pleading or otherwise defend at any time before a motion for default and supporting affidavit is filed, whether the party previously has appeared or not. If the party has appeared before the motion is filed, the party he may respond to the pleading or otherwise defend at any time before the hearing on the motion. If the party has not appeared before the motion is filed the party he may not respond to the pleading nor otherwise defend without leave of court. Any appearances for any purpose in the action shall be for all purposes under this rule 55.
(b) Entry of Default Judgment. As limited in rule 54(c), judgment after default may be entered as follows, if proof of service is on file as required by subsection (b)(4):
(1) When Amount Certain. When the claim against a party, whose default has been entered under section (a), is for a sum certain or for a sum which can by computation be made certain, the court upon motion and affidavit of the amount due shall enter judgment for that amount and costs against the party in default, if the party he is not an infant or incompetent person. No judgment by default shall be entered against an infant or incompetent person unless represented by a general guardian or guardian ad litem. Findings of fact and conclusions of law are not necessary under this subsection even though reasonable attorney fees are requested and allowed.
(3) When Service by Publication or Mail. In an action where the service of the summons was by publication, or by mail under rule 4 (d)(4), the plaintiff, upon the expiration of the time for answering, may, upon proof of service, apply for judgment. The court must thereupon require proof of the demand mentioned in the complaint, and must require the plaintiff or the plaintiff's his agent to be examined on oath respecting any payments that have been made to the plaintiff, or to any one for the plaintiff's his use on account of such demand, and may render judgment for the amount which the plaintiff he is entitled to recover, or for such other relief the plaintiff as he may be entitled to.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 56 (a), (b), (e), (f), (g)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 56. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(a) For Claimant. A party seeking to recover upon a claim, counterclaim, or cross claim, or to obtain a declaratory judgment may, after the expiration of the period within which the defendant is required to appear, or after service of a motion for summary judgment by the adverse party, move with or without supporting affidavits for a summary judgment in the party's his favor upon all or any part thereof.
(b) For Defending Party. A party against whom a claim, counterclaim, or cross claim is asserted or a declaratory judgment is sought may move with or without supporting affidavits for a summary judgment in such party's his favor as to all or any part thereof.
(e) Form of Affidavits; Further Testimony; Defense Required. Supporting and opposing affidavits shall be made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein. Sworn or certified copies of all papers or parts thereof referred to in an affidavit shall be attached thereto or served therewith. The court may permit affidavits to be supplemented or opposed by depositions, answers to interrogatories, or further affidavits. When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his a pleading, but his a response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. If the adverse party he does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against the adverse party. him.
(f) When Affidavits Are Unavailable. Should it appear from the affidavits of a party opposing the motion that he cannot, for reasons stated, the party cannot present by affidavit facts essential to justify the party's his opposition, the court may refuse the application for judgment or may order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or depositions to be taken or discovery to be had or may make such other order as is just.
(g) Affidavits Made in Bad Faith. Should it appear to the satisfaction of the court at any time that any of the affidavits presented pursuant to this rule are presented in bad faith or solely for the purpose of delay, the court shall forthwith order the party employing them to pay to the other party the amount of the reasonable expenses which the filing of the affidavits caused the other party him to incur, including reasonable attorney fees, and any offending party or attorney may be adjudged guilty of contempt.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 58(b) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 58. ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
(b) Effective Time. Judgments shall be deemed entered for all procedural purposes from the time of delivery to the clerk for filing, unless the judge earlier permits the judgment to be filed directly with the judge him as authorized by rule 5(e).
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 59 (a)(2), (a)(4) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 59. NEW TRIAL, RECONSIDERATION, AND AMENDMENT OF JUDGMENTS
(a) Grounds for New Trial or Reconsideration. On the motion of the party aggrieved, a verdict may be vacated and a new trial granted to all or any of the parties, and on all issues, or on some of the issues when such issues are clearly and fairly separable and distinct, or any other decision or order may be vacated and reconsideration granted. Such motion may be granted for any one of the following causes materially affecting the substantial rights of such parties:
(2) Misconduct of prevailing party or jury; and whenever any one or more of the jurors shall have been induced to assent to any general or special verdict or to a finding on any question or questions submitted to the jury by the court, other and different from the juror's his own conclusions, and arrived at by a resort to the determination of chance or lot, such misconduct may be proved by the affidavits of one or more of the jurors;
(4) Newly discovered evidence, material for the party making the application, which the party he could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial;
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 60 (b), (e)(1) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 60. RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER
(b) Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence; Fraud; etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or the party's his legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:
(e) Procedure on Vacation of Judgment.
(1) Motion. Application shall be made by motion filed in the cause stating the grounds upon which relief is asked, and supported by the affidavit of the applicant or the applicant's his attorney setting forth a concise statement of the facts or errors upon which the motion is based, and if the moving party be a defendant, the facts constituting a defense to the action or proceeding.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 63(b) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 63. JUDGES
(b) Disability of a Judge. If by reason of death, sickness, or other disability, a judge before whom an action has been tried is unable to perform the duties to be performed by the court under these rules after a verdict is returned or findings of fact and conclusions of law are filed, then any other judge regularly sitting in or assigned to the court in which the action was tried may perform those duties; but if a new judge cannot perform those duties, the new judge has the discretion to grant a new trial. such other judge is satisfied that he cannot perform those duties because he did not preside at the trial or for any other reason, he may n his discretion grant a new trial.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 65.1 OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 65.1. SECURITYPROCEEDINGS AGAINST SURETIES
Whenever these rules require or permit the giving of security by a party, and security is given in the form of a bond or stipulation or other undertaking with one or more sureties, each surety submits himself to the jurisdiction of the court and irrevocably appoints the clerk of the court as the surety's his agent upon whom any papers affecting the surety's his liability on the bond or undertaking may be served. The surety's His liability may be enforced on motion without the necessity of an independent action. The motion and such notice of the motion as the court prescribes may be served on the clerk of the court, who shall forthwith mail copies to the sureties if their addresses are known.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 65(b) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 65. INJUNCTIONS
(b) Temporary Restraining Order; Notice; Hearing; Duration. A temporary restraining order may be granted without written or oral notice to the adverse party or the adverse party's his attorney only if (1) it clearly appears from specific facts shown by affidavit or by the verified complaint that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the applicant before the adverse party or her or his attorney can be heard in opposition, and (2) the applicant's attorney certifies to the court in writing the efforts, if any, which have been made to give the notice and the reasons supporting the applicant's his claim that notice should not be required. Every temporary restraining order granted without notice shall be endorsed with the date and hour of issuance; shall be filed forthwith in the clerk's office and entered of record; shall define the injury and state why it is irreparable and why the order was granted without notice; and shall expire by its terms within such time after entry, not to exceed 14 days, as the court fixes, unless within the time so fixed the order, for good cause shown, is extended for a like period or unless the party against whom the order is directed consents that it may be extended for a longer period. The reasons for the extension shall be entered of record. In case a temporary restraining order is granted without notice, the motion for a preliminary injunction shall be set down for hearing at the earliest possible time and takes precedence over all matters except older matters of the same character; and when the motion comes on for hearing the party who obtained the temporary restraining order shall proceed with the application for a preliminary injunction and, if the party he does not do so, the court shall dissolve the temporary restraining order. On 2 days' notice to the party who obtained the temporary restraining order without notice or on such shorter notice to that party as the court may prescribe, the adverse party may appear and move its dissolution or modification and in that event the court shall proceed to hear and determine such motion as expeditiously as the ends of justice require.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 68 OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 68. OFFER OF JUDGMENT
At any time more than 10 days before the trial begins, a party defending against a claim may serve upon the adverse party an offer to allow judgment to be taken against the defending party him for the money or property or to the effect specified in the defending party's his offer, with costs then accrued. If within 10 days after the service of the offer the adverse party serves written notice that the offer is accepted, either party may then file the offer and notice of acceptance together with proof of service thereof and thereupon the court shall enter judgment. An offer not accepted shall be deemed withdrawn and evidence thereof is not admissible except in a proceeding to determine costs. If the judgment finally obtained by the offeree is not more favorable than the offer, the offeree must pay the costs incurred after the making of the offer. The fact that an offer is made but not accepted does not preclude a subsequent offer. When the liability of one party to another has been determined by verdict or order or judgment, but the amount or extent of the liability remains to be determined by further proceedings, the party adjudged liable may make an offer of judgment, which shall have the same effect as an offer made before trial if it is served within a reasonable time not less than 10 days prior to the commencement of hearings to determine the amount or extent of liability.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 69(b) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 69. EXECUTION
(b) Supplemental Proceedings. In aid of the judgment or execution, the judgment creditor or his successor in interest when that interest appears of record, may examine any person, including the judgment debtor, in the manner provided in these rules for taking depositions or in the manner provided by RCW 6.3
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 77 (c)(7), (c)(8)(B), (k)
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 77. SUPERIOR COURTS AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS
(c) Powers of Judicial Officers.
(7) Powers of Judge in Counties of Judge's His District. [Reserved. See RCW 2.08.190.]
(8) Visiting Judges.
(B) Powers. Whenever a visiting judge has heard or tried any case or matter and has departed from the county, the visiting judge he may require the argument on any posttrial motion to be submitted to the him visiting judge on briefs at such place within the state as the visiting judge he may designate and the visiting judge he may sign findings of fact, conclusions of law, judgments and posttrial orders anywhere within the state. See also RCW 2.08.140 and 2.08.150.
(k) Motion DayLocal Rules. Unless local conditions make it impracticable, the superior court in each county shall establish regular times and places, at intervals sufficiently frequent for the prompt dispatch of business, at which motions requiring notice and hearing may be heard and disposed of; but the judge at any time or place and on such notice, if any, as the judge considers reasonable may make orders for the advancement, conduct, and hearing of actions.
SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO
RULE 78(c) OF THE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (Cr)
RULE 78. CLERKS
(c) Orders by Clerk. All motions and applications in the clerk's office for issuing mesne process, for issuing final process to enforce and execute judgments, and for other proceedings which do not require allowance or order of the court are grantable of course by the clerk; but the clerk's his action may be suspended or altered or rescinded by the court upon cause shown.
Reviser's note: The typographical errors in the above material occurred in the copy filed by the State Supreme Court and appear in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
Reviser's note: The brackets and enclosed material in the text of the above section occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appear in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.
Reviser's note: The spelling error in the above section occurred in the copy filed by the agency and appears in the Register pursuant to the requirements of RCW 34.08.040.