H-1103.2 _______________________________________________
HOUSE BILL 1489
_______________________________________________
State of Washington 55th Legislature 1997 Regular Session
By Representatives Chandler, Linville, L. Thomas, Reams, Sheldon, Cairnes, McMorris, Veloria and Schoesler
Read first time 01/28/97. Referred to Committee on Agriculture & Ecology.
AN ACT Relating to public works and water pollution control funding; amending RCW 43.155.070 and 70.146.070; and declaring an emergency.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1. RCW 43.155.070 and 1996 c 168 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) To qualify for loans or pledges under this chapter the board must determine that a local government meets all of the following conditions:
(a) The city or county must be imposing a tax under chapter 82.46 RCW at a rate of at least one-quarter of one percent;
(b) The local government must have developed a long-term plan for financing public works needs; and
(c)
The local government must be using all local revenue sources which are
reasonably available for funding public works, taking into consideration local
employment and economic factors((; and
(d)
A county, city, or town that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040
must have adopted a comprehensive plan in conformance with the requirements of
chapter 36.70A RCW, after it is required that the comprehensive plan be
adopted, and must have adopted development regulations in conformance with the
requirements of chapter 36.70A RCW, after it is required that development
regulations be adopted)).
(2) The board shall develop a priority process for public works projects as provided in this section. The intent of the priority process is to maximize the value of public works projects accomplished with assistance under this chapter. The board shall attempt to assure a geographical balance in assigning priorities to projects. The board shall consider at least the following factors in assigning a priority to a project:
(a) Whether the local government receiving assistance has experienced severe fiscal distress resulting from natural disaster or emergency public works needs;
(b) Whether the project is critical in nature and would affect the health and safety of a great number of citizens;
(c) The cost of the project compared to the size of the local government and amount of loan money available;
(d) The number of communities served by or funding the project;
(e) Whether the project is located in an area of high unemployment, compared to the average state unemployment;
(f) Whether the project is the acquisition, expansion, improvement, or renovation by a local government of a public water system that is in violation of health and safety standards, including the cost of extending existing service to such a system;
(g) The relative benefit of the project to the community, considering the present level of economic activity in the community and the existing local capacity to increase local economic activity in communities that have low economic growth; and
(h) Other criteria that the board considers advisable.
(3) Existing debt or financial obligations of local governments shall not be refinanced under this chapter. Each local government applicant shall provide documentation of attempts to secure additional local or other sources of funding for each public works project for which financial assistance is sought under this chapter.
(4) Before November 1 of each year, the board shall develop and submit to the appropriate fiscal committees of the senate and house of representatives a description of the loans made under RCW 43.155.065, 43.155.068, and subsection (7) of this section during the preceding fiscal year and a prioritized list of projects which are recommended for funding by the legislature, including one copy to the staff of each of the committees. The list shall include, but not be limited to, a description of each project and recommended financing, the terms and conditions of the loan or financial guarantee, the local government jurisdiction and unemployment rate, demonstration of the jurisdiction's critical need for the project and documentation of local funds being used to finance the public works project. The list shall also include measures of fiscal capacity for each jurisdiction recommended for financial assistance, compared to authorized limits and state averages, including local government sales taxes; real estate excise taxes; property taxes; and charges for or taxes on sewerage, water, garbage, and other utilities.
(5) The board shall not sign contracts or otherwise financially obligate funds from the public works assistance account before the legislature has appropriated funds for a specific list of public works projects. The legislature may remove projects from the list recommended by the board. The legislature shall not change the order of the priorities recommended for funding by the board.
(6) Subsection (5) of this section does not apply to loans made under RCW 43.155.065, 43.155.068, and subsection (7) of this section.
(7)(a) Loans made for the purpose of capital facilities plans shall be exempted from subsection (5) of this section. In no case shall the total amount of funds utilized for capital facilities plans and emergency loans exceed the limitation in RCW 43.155.065.
(b) For the purposes of this section "capital facilities plans" means those plans required by the growth management act, chapter 36.70A RCW, and plans required by the public works board for local governments not subject to the growth management act.
(8) To qualify for loans or pledges for solid waste or recycling facilities under this chapter, a city or county must demonstrate that the solid waste or recycling facility is consistent with and necessary to implement the comprehensive solid waste management plan adopted by the city or county under chapter 70.95 RCW.
Sec. 2. RCW 70.146.070 and 1991 sp.s. c 32 s 24 are each amended to read as follows:
When making grants or loans for water pollution control facilities, the department shall consider the following:
(1) The protection of water quality and public health;
(2) The cost to residential ratepayers if they had to finance water pollution control facilities without state assistance;
(3) Actions required under federal and state permits and compliance orders;
(4) The level of local fiscal effort by residential ratepayers since 1972 in financing water pollution control facilities;
(5) The extent to which the applicant county or city, or if the applicant is another public body, the extent to which the county or city in which the applicant public body is located, has established programs to mitigate nonpoint pollution of the surface or subterranean water sought to be protected by the water pollution control facility named in the application for state assistance; and
(6)
The recommendations of the Puget Sound ((water quality authority)) action
team and any other board, council, commission, or group established by the
legislature or a state agency to study water pollution control issues in the
state.
((A
county, city, or town that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040
may not receive a grant or loan for water pollution control facilities unless
it has adopted a comprehensive plan in conformance with the requirements of
chapter 36.70A RCW, after it is required that the comprehensive plan be
adopted, or unless it has adopted development regulations in conformance with
the requirements of chapter 36.70A RCW, after it is required that development
regulations be adopted.))
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately.
--- END ---