CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT
ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1866
Chapter 381, Laws of 1997
(partial veto)
55th Legislature
1997 Regular Session
ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE PROGRAM AGREEMENTS
EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/27/97
Passed by the House April 22, 1997 Yeas 84 Nays 14
CLYDE BALLARD Speaker of the House of Representatives
Passed by the Senate April 18, 1997 Yeas 30 Nays 15 |
CERTIFICATE
I, Timothy A. Martin, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1866 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth. |
BRAD OWEN President of the Senate |
TIMOTHY A. MARTIN Chief Clerk
|
Approved May 15, 1997, with the exception of sections 11, 15, and 31, which are vetoed. |
FILED
May 15, 1997 - 4:31 p.m. |
|
|
GARY LOCKE Governor of the State of Washington |
Secretary of State State of Washington |
_______________________________________________
ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1866
_______________________________________________
Passed Legislature - 1997 Regular Session
AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE
State of Washington 55th Legislature 1997 Regular Session
By House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Chandler, Linville, Lisk, Delvin and Schoesler)
Read first time 03/10/97.
AN ACT Relating to the establishment of voluntary programs creating environmental excellence program agreements; amending RCW 90.54.020; adding a new section to chapter 43.21A RCW; adding a new section to chapter 70.94 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 70.95 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 70.105 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 70.119A RCW; adding a new section to chapter 75.20 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 90.48 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 90.52 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 90.58 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 90.64 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 90.71 RCW; adding a new chapter to Title 43 RCW; and creating new sections.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The purpose of this act is to create a voluntary program authorizing environmental excellence program agreements with persons regulated under the environmental laws of the state of Washington, and to direct agencies of the state of Washington to solicit and support the development of agreements that use innovative environmental measures or strategies to achieve environmental results more effectively or efficiently.
Agencies shall encourage environmental excellence program agreements that favor or promote pollution prevention, source reduction, or improvements in practices that are transferable to other interested entities or that can achieve better overall environmental results than required by otherwise applicable rules and requirements.
In enacting this act it is not the intent of the legislature that state environmental standards be applied in a manner that could result in these state standards being waived under section 121 of the federal comprehensive environmental response, compensation, and liability act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 9261).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(1) "State, regional, or local agency" means an agency, board, department, authority, or commission that administers environmental laws.
(2) "Coordinating agency" means the state, regional, or local agency with the primary regulatory responsibility for the proposed environmental excellence program agreement. If multiple agencies have jurisdiction to administer state environmental laws affected by an environmental excellence agreement, the department of ecology shall designate or act as the coordinating agency.
(3) "Director" means the individual or body of individuals in whom the ultimate legal authority of an agency is vested by any provision of law. If the agency head is a body of individuals, a majority of those individuals constitutes the director.
(4) "Environmental laws" means chapters 43.21A, 70.94, 70.95, 70.105, 70.119A, 75.20, 90.48, 90.52, 90.58, 90.64, and 90.71 RCW, and RCW 90.54.020(3)(b) and rules adopted under those chapters and section. The term environmental laws as used in this chapter does not include any provision of the Revised Code of Washington, or of any municipal ordinance or enactment, that regulates the selection of a location for a new facility.
(5) "Facility" means a site or activity that is regulated under any of the provisions of the environmental laws.
(6) "Legal requirement" includes any provision of an environmental law, rule, order, or permit.
(7) "Sponsor" means the owner or operator of a facility, including a municipal corporation, subject to regulation under the environmental laws of the state of Washington, or an authorized representative of the owner or operator, that submits a proposal for an environmental excellence program agreement.
(8) "Stakeholder" means a person who has a direct interest in the proposed environmental excellence program agreement or who represents a public interest in the proposed environmental excellence program agreement. Stakeholders may include communities near the project, local or state governments, permittees, businesses, environmental and other public interest groups, employees or employee representatives, or other persons.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. An environmental excellence program agreement entered into under this chapter must achieve more effective or efficient environmental results than the results that would be otherwise achieved. The basis for comparison shall be a reasonable estimate of the overall impact of the participating facility on the environment in the absence of an environmental excellence program agreement. More effective environmental results are results that are better overall than those that would be achieved under the legal requirements superseded or replaced by the agreement. More efficient environmental results are results that are achieved at reduced cost but do not decrease the overall environmental results achieved by the participating facility. An environmental excellence program agreement may not authorize either (1) the release of water pollutants that will cause to be exceeded, at points of compliance in the ambient environment established pursuant to law, numeric surface water or ground water quality criteria or numeric sediment quality criteria adopted as rules under chapter 90.48 RCW; or (2) the emission of any air contaminants that will cause to be exceeded any air quality standard as defined in RCW 70.94.030(3); or (3) a decrease in the overall environmental results achieved by the participating facility compared with results achieved over a representative period before the date on which the agreement is proposed by the sponsor. However, an environmental excellence program agreement may authorize reasonable increases in the release of pollutants to permit increases in facility production or facility expansion and modification.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. (1) The director of a state, regional, or local agency may enter into an environmental excellence program agreement with any sponsor, even if one or more of the terms of the environmental excellence program agreement would be inconsistent with an otherwise applicable legal requirement. An environmental excellence program agreement must meet the requirements of section 3 of this act. Otherwise applicable legal requirements identified according to section 7(1) of this act shall be superseded and replaced in accordance with section 9 of this act.
(2) The director of a state, regional, or local agency may enter into an environmental excellence program agreement only to the extent the state, regional, or local agency has jurisdiction to administer state environmental laws either directly or indirectly through the adoption of rules.
(3) Where a sponsor proposes an environmental excellence program agreement that would affect legal requirements applicable to the covered facility that are administered by more than one state, regional, or local agency, the coordinating agency shall take the lead in developing the environmental excellence program agreement with the sponsor and other agencies administering legal requirements applicable to the covered facility and affected by the agreement. The environmental excellence program agreement does not become effective until the agreement is approved by the director of each agency administering legal requirements identified according to section 7(1) of this act.
(4) No director may enter into an environmental excellence program agreement applicable to a remedial action conducted under the Washington model toxics control act, chapter 70.105D RCW, or the federal comprehensive environmental response, compensation and liability act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 9601 et seq.). No action taken under this chapter shall be deemed a waiver of any applicable, relevant, or appropriate requirements for any remedial action conducted under the Washington model toxics control act or the federal comprehensive environmental response, compensation and liability act.
(5) The directors of state, regional, or local agencies shall not enter into an environmental excellence program agreement or a modification of an environmental excellence program agreement containing terms affecting legal requirements adopted to comply with provisions of a federal regulatory program and to which the responsible federal agency objects after notice under the terms of section 8(4) of this act.
(6) The directors of regional or local governments may not enter into an environmental excellence program agreement or a modification of an environmental excellence program agreement containing terms affecting legal requirements that are subject to review or appeal by a state agency, including but not limited to chapters 70.94, 70.95, and 90.58 RCW, and to which the responsible state agency objects after notice is given under the terms of section 8(4) of this act.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. (1) A sponsor may propose an environmental excellence program agreement. A trade association or other authorized representative of a sponsor or sponsors may propose a programmatic environmental excellence program agreement for multiple facilities.
(2) A sponsor must submit, at a minimum, the following information and other information that may be requested by the director or directors required to sign the agreement:
(a) A statement that describes how the proposal is consistent with the purpose of this chapter and the project approval criteria in section 3 of this act;
(b)(i) For a site-specific proposal, a comprehensive description of the proposed environmental excellence project that includes the nature of the facility and the operations that will be affected, how the facility or operations will achieve results more effectively or efficiently, and the nature of the results anticipated; or
(ii) For a programmatic proposal, a comprehensive description of the proposed environmental excellence project that identifies the facilities and the operations that are expected to participate, how participating facilities or operations will achieve environmental results more effectively or efficiently, the nature of the results anticipated, and the method to identify and document the commitments made by individual participants;
(c) An environmental checklist, containing sufficient information to reasonably inform the public of the nature of the proposed environmental excellence program agreement and describing probable significant adverse environmental impacts and environmental benefits expected from implementation of the proposal;
(d) A draft environmental excellence program agreement;
(e) A description of the stakeholder process as provided in section 6 of this act;
(f) A preliminary identification of the permit amendments or modifications that may be necessary to implement the proposed environmental excellence program agreement.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. (1) Stakeholder participation in and support for an environmental excellence program agreement is vital to the integrity of the environmental excellence program agreement and helps to inform the decision whether an environmental excellence program agreement can be approved.
(2) A proposal for an environmental excellence program agreement shall include the sponsor's plan to identify and contact stakeholders, to advise stakeholders of the facts and nature of the project, and to request stakeholder participation and review. Stakeholder participation and review shall occur during the development, consideration, and implementation stages of the proposed environmental excellence program agreement. The plan shall include notice to the employees of the facility to be covered by the proposed environmental excellence program agreement and public notice in the area of the covered facility.
(3) The coordinating agency shall extend an invitation to participate in the development of the proposal to a broad and representative sector of the public likely to be affected by the environmental excellence program agreement, including representatives of local community, labor, environmental, and neighborhood advocacy groups. The coordinating agency shall select participants to be included in the stakeholder process that are representative of the diverse sectors of the public that are interested in the agreement. The stakeholder process shall include the opportunity for discussion and comment at multiple stages of the process and access to the information relied upon by the directors in approving the agreement.
(4) The coordinating agency will identify any additional provisions for the stakeholder process that the director of the coordinating agency, in the director's sole discretion, considers appropriate to the success of the stakeholder process, and provide for notice to the United States environmental protection agency or other responsible federal agency of each proposed environmental excellence program agreement that may affect legal requirements of any program administered by that agency.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. An environmental excellence program agreement must contain the following terms and conditions:
(1) An identification of all legal requirements that are superseded or replaced by the environmental excellence program agreement;
(2) A description of all legal requirements that are enforceable as provided in section 13(1) of this act that are different from those legal requirements applicable in the absence of the environmental excellence program agreement;
(3) A description of the voluntary goals that are or will be pursued by the sponsor;
(4) A statement describing how the environmental excellence program agreement will achieve the purposes of this chapter;
(5) A statement describing how the environmental excellence program agreement will be implemented, including a list of steps and an implementation schedule;
(6) A statement that the proposed environmental excellence program agreement will not increase overall worker safety risks or cause an unjust or disproportionate and inequitable distribution of environmental risks among diverse economic and cultural communities;
(7) A summary of the stakeholder process that was followed in the development of the environmental excellence program agreement;
(8) A statement describing how any participating facility shall measure and demonstrate its compliance with the environmental excellence program agreement including, without limitation, a description of the methods to be used to monitor performance, criteria that represent acceptable performance, and the method of reporting performance to the public and local communities. The facility's compliance with the agreement must be independently verifiable;
(9) A description of and plan for public participation in the implementation of the environmental excellence program agreement and for public access to information needed to assess the benefits of the environmental excellence program agreement and the sponsor's compliance with the environmental excellence program agreement;
(10) A schedule of periodic performance review of the environmental excellence program agreement by the directors that signed the agreement;
(11) Provisions for voluntary and involuntary termination of the agreement;
(12) The duration of the environmental excellence program agreement and provisions for renewal;
(13) Statements approving the environmental excellence program agreement made by the sponsor and by or on behalf of directors of each state, regional, or local agency administering legal requirements that are identified according to section 7(1) of this act;
(14) Additional terms as requested by the directors signing the environmental excellence program agreement and consistent with this chapter;
(15) Draft permits or permit modifications as needed to implement the environmental excellence program agreement;
(16) With respect to a programmatic environmental excellence program agreement, a statement of the method with which to identify and document the specific commitments to be made by individual participants.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. (1) The coordinating agency shall provide at least thirty days after notice has been published in a newspaper under subsection (2) of this section for public comment on a proposal to enter into or modify an environmental excellence program agreement. The coordinating agency may provide for an additional period of public comment if required by the complexity of the proposed environmental excellence program agreement and the degree of public interest. Before the start of the comment period, the coordinating agency shall prepare a proposed agreement, a public notice and a fact sheet. The fact sheet shall: (a) Briefly describe the principal facts and the significant factual, legal, methodological and policy questions considered by the directors signing the agreement, and the directors' proposed decisions; and (b) briefly describe how the proposed action meets the requirements of section 3 of this act.
(2) The coordinating agency shall publish notice of the proposed agreement in the Washington State Register and in a newspaper of general circulation in the vicinity of the facility or facilities covered by the proposed environmental excellence program agreement. The notice shall generally describe the agreement or modification; the facilities to be covered; summarize the changes in legal requirements that will result from the agreement; summarize the reasons for approving the agreement or modifications; identify an agency person to contact for additional information; state that the proposed agreement or modification and fact sheet are available on request; and state that comments may be submitted to the agency during the comment period. The coordinating agency shall order a public informational meeting or a public hearing to receive oral comments if the written comments during the comment period demonstrate considerable public interest in the proposed agreement.
(3) The coordinating agency shall prepare and make available a responsiveness summary indicating the agencies' actions taken in response to comments and the reasons for those actions.
(4) With respect to an environmental excellence program agreement that affects legal requirements adopted to comply with provisions of a federal regulatory program, the coordinating agency shall provide a copy of the environmental excellence program agreement, and a copy of the notice required by subsection (1) of this section, to the federal agency that is responsible for administering that program at least thirty days before entering into or modifying the environmental excellence program agreement, and shall afford the federal agency the opportunity to object to those terms of the environmental excellence program agreement or modification of an environmental excellence program agreement affecting the legal requirements. The coordinating agency shall provide similar notice to state agencies that have statutory review or appeal responsibilities regarding provisions of the environmental excellence program agreement.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement identified under section 7(1) of this act shall be superseded or replaced in accordance with the terms of the environmental excellence program agreement. Legal requirements contained in a permit that are affected by an environmental excellence program agreement will continue to be enforceable until such time as the permit is revised in accordance with subsection (2) of this section. With respect to any other legal requirements, the legal requirements contained in the environmental excellence program agreement are effective as provided by the environmental excellence program agreement, and the facility or facilities covered by an environmental excellence program agreement shall comply with the terms of the environmental excellence program agreement in lieu of the legal requirements that are superseded and replaced by the approved environmental excellence program agreement.
(2) Any permits affected by an environmental excellence program agreement shall be revised to conform to the environmental excellence program agreement by the agency with jurisdiction. The permit revisions will be completed within one hundred twenty days of the effective date of the agreement in accordance with otherwise applicable procedural requirements, including, where applicable, public notice and the opportunity for comment, and the opportunity for review and objection by federal agencies.
(3) Other than as superseded or replaced as provided in an approved environmental excellence program agreement, any existing permit requirements remain in effect and are enforceable.
(4) A programmatic environmental excellence program agreement shall become applicable to an individual facility when all directors entering into the programmatic agreement approve the owner or operator's commitment to comply with the agreement. A programmatic agreement may not take effect, however, until notice and an opportunity to comment for the individual facility has been provided in accordance with the requirements of section 8 (1) through (3) of this act.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. (1) A decision by the directors of state, regional, or local agencies to approve a proposed environmental excellence program agreement, or to terminate or modify an approved environmental excellence program agreement, is subject to judicial review in superior court. For purposes of judicial review, the court may grant relief from the decision to approve or modify an environmental excellence program agreement only if it determines that the action: (a) Violates constitutional provisions; (b) exceeds the statutory authority of the agency; (c) was arbitrary and capricious; or (d) was taken without compliance with the procedures provided by this chapter. However, the decision of the director or directors shall be accorded substantial deference by the court. A decision not to enter into or modify an environmental excellence program agreement and a decision not to accept a commitment under section 9(4) of this act to comply with the terms of a programmatic environmental excellence agreement are within the sole discretion of the directors of the state, regional, or local agencies and are not subject to review.
(2) An appeal from a decision to approve or modify a facility specific or a programmatic environmental excellence program agreement is not timely unless filed with the superior court and served on the parties to the environmental excellence program agreement within thirty days of the date on which the agreement or modification is signed by the director. For an environmental excellence program agreement or modification signed by more than one director, there is only one appeal, and the time for appeal shall run from the last date on which the agreement or modification is signed by a director.
(3) A decision to accept the commitment of a specific facility to comply with the terms of a programmatic environmental excellence program agreement, or to modify the application of an agreement to a specific facility, is subject to judicial review as described in subsection (1) of this section. An appeal is not timely unless filed with the superior court and served on the directors signing the agreement, the sponsor, and the owner or operator of the specific facility within thirty days of the date the director or directors that signed the programmatic agreement approve the owner or operator's commitment to comply with the agreement. For a programmatic environmental excellence program agreement or modification signed by more than one director, there shall be only one appeal and the time for appeal shall run from the last date on which a director approves the commitment.
(4) The issuance of permits and permit modifications is subject to review under otherwise applicable law.
(5) An appeal of a decision by a director under section 11 of this act to terminate in whole or in part a facility specific or programmatic environmental excellence program agreement is not timely unless filed with the superior court and served on the director within thirty days of the date on which notice of the termination is issued under section 11(2) of this act.
*NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. (1) In addition to any termination provisions contained in an environmental excellence program agreement, a director of an agency may terminate an environmental excellence program agreement in whole or in part with respect to a legal requirement administered by that agency, if the director finds: (a) That after notice and a reasonable opportunity to cure, the covered facility is in violation of a material requirement of the agreement; (b) that the facility has repeatedly violated any requirements of the agreement; (c) that the operation of the facility under the agreement has caused endangerment to public health or the environment that cannot be remedied by modification of the agreement; or (d) the facility has failed to make substantial progress in achieving the voluntary goals identified under section 6(4) of this act, and these goals are material to the overall objectives of the agreement.
(2) A director of an agency terminating an environmental excellence program agreement in any respect shall provide each of the parties to the agreement with a written notice of that action specifying the extent to which the environmental excellence program agreement is to be terminated, the factual and legal basis for termination, and a description of the opportunity for judicial review of the decision to terminate the environmental excellence program agreement.
(3) If a director terminates less than the entire environmental excellence program agreement, the owner or operator of the covered facility may elect to terminate the entire agreement as it applies to the facility.
(4) If a director decides to terminate an environmental excellence program agreement because the facility has not been able to meet the legal requirements established under the agreement, or because operation of the facility under the agreement has caused endangerment to public health or the environment, as provided in subsection (1)(c) of this section, the director may establish in the notice of termination: (a) Practical interim requirements for the facility that are no less stringent than the legal requirements that would apply to the facility in the absence of the agreement; and (b) a practical schedule of compliance for meeting the interim requirements. The interim requirements and schedule of compliance shall be subject to judicial review under the provisions of section 10(5) of this act. The facility shall comply with the interim requirements established under this subsection after they are final and no longer subject to judicial review until applicable permits or permit modifications have been issued under section 12 of this act.
*Sec. 11 was vetoed. See message at end of chapter.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. After a termination under section 11 of this act is final and no longer subject to judicial review, the sponsor has sixty days in which to apply for any permit or approval affected by any terminated portion of the environmental excellence program agreement. An application filed during the sixty‑day period shall be deemed a timely application for renewal of a permit under the terms of any applicable law. Except as provided in section 11(4) of this act, the terms and conditions of the environmental excellence program agreement and of permits issued will continue in effect until a final permit or approval is issued. If the sponsor fails to submit a timely or complete application, any affected permit or approval may be modified at any time that is consistent with applicable law.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 13. (1) The legal requirements contained in the environmental excellence program agreement in accordance with section 7(2) of this act are enforceable commitments of the facility covered by the agreement. Any violation of these legal requirements is subject to penalties and remedies to the same extent as the legal requirements that they superseded or replaced.
(2) The voluntary goals stated in the environmental excellence program agreement in accordance with section 7(3) of this act are voluntary commitments of the facility covered by the agreement. If the facility fails to meet these goals, it shall not be subject to any form of enforcement action, including penalties, orders, or any form of injunctive relief. The failure to make substantial progress in meeting these goals may be a basis on which to terminate the environmental excellence program agreement under section 11 of this act.
(3) Nothing in this chapter limits the authority of an agency, the attorney general, or a prosecuting attorney to initiate an enforcement action for violation of any applicable legal requirement. However, no civil, criminal, or administrative action may be brought with respect to any legal requirement that is superseded or replaced under the terms of an environmental excellence program agreement.
(4) This chapter does not create any new authority for citizen suits, and does not alter or amend other statutory provisions authorizing citizen suits.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 14. An environmental excellence program agreement may contain a reduced fee schedule with respect to a program applicable to the covered facility or facilities.
*NEW SECTION. Sec. 15. A decision to approve an environmental excellence program agreement is not subject to the requirements of the state environmental policy act, chapter 43.21C RCW, including the requirement to prepare an environmental impact statement under RCW 43.21C.031. However, the consideration of a proposed environmental excellence program agreement will integrate an assessment of environmental impacts.
*Sec. 15 was vetoed. See message at end of chapter.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 16. Any state, regional, or local agency administering programs under an environmental law may adopt rules or ordinances to implement this chapter. However, it is not necessary that an agency adopt rules or ordinances in order to consider or enter into environmental excellence program agreements.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 17. The director of the department of ecology shall appoint an advisory committee to review the effectiveness of the environmental excellence program agreement program and to make a recommendation to the legislature concerning the continuation, termination, or modification of the program. The committee also may make recommendations it considers appropriate for revision of any regulatory program that is affected by an environmental excellence program agreement. The committee shall be composed of one representative each from two state agencies, two representatives of the regulated community, and two representatives of environmental organizations or other public interest groups. The committee must submit a report and its recommendation to the legislature not later than October 31, 2001. The department of ecology shall provide the advisory committee with such support as they may require.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. (1) Agencies authorized to enter into environmental excellence program agreements may assess and collect a fee to recover the costs of processing environmental excellence program agreement proposals. The amount of the fee may not exceed the direct and indirect costs of processing the environmental excellence program agreement proposal. Processing includes, but is not limited to: Working with the sponsor to develop the agreement, meeting with stakeholder groups, conducting public meetings and hearings, preparing a record of the decision to enter into or modify an agreement, and defending any appeal from a decision to enter into or modify an agreement. Fees also may include, to the extent specified by the agreement, the agencies' direct costs of monitoring compliance with those specific terms of an agreement not covered by permits issued to the participating facility.
(2) Agencies assessing fees may graduate the initial fees for processing an environmental excellence program agreement proposal to account for the size of the sponsor and to make the environmental excellence program agreement program more available to small businesses. An agency may exercise its discretion to waive all or any part of the fees.
(3) Sponsors may voluntarily contribute funds to the administration of an agency's environmental excellence program agreement program.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. The authority of a director to enter into a new environmental excellence program agreement program shall be terminated June 30, 2002. Environmental excellence program agreements entered into before June 30, 2002, shall remain in force and effect subject to the provisions of this chapter.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 20. A new section is added to chapter 43.21A RCW to read as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement under this chapter, including any standard, limitation, rule, or order is superseded and replaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of an environmental excellence program agreement, entered into under chapter 43.‑- RCW (sections 2 through 19 of this act).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 21. A new section is added to chapter 70.94 RCW to read as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement under this chapter, including any standard, limitation, rule, or order is superseded and replaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of an environmental excellence program agreement, entered into under chapter 43.‑- RCW (sections 2 through 19 of this act).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 22. A new section is added to chapter 70.95 RCW to read as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement under this chapter, including any standard, limitation, rule, or order is superseded and replaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of an environmental excellence program agreement, entered into under chapter 43.‑- RCW (sections 2 through 19 of this act).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 23. A new section is added to chapter 70.105 RCW to read as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement under this chapter, including any standard, limitation, rule, or order is superseded and replaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of an environmental excellence program agreement, entered into under chapter 43.‑- RCW (sections 2 through 19 of this act).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 24. A new section is added to chapter 70.119A RCW to read as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement under this chapter, including any standard, limitation, rule, or order is superseded and replaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of an environmental excellence program agreement, entered into under chapter 43.‑- RCW (sections 2 through 19 of this act).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 25. A new section is added to chapter 75.20 RCW to read as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement under this chapter, including any standard, limitation, rule, or order is superseded and replaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of an environmental excellence program agreement, entered into under chapter 43.‑- RCW (sections 2 through 19 of this act).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 26. A new section is added to chapter 90.48 RCW to read as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement under this chapter, including any standard, limitation, rule, or order is superseded and replaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of an environmental excellence program agreement, entered into under chapter 43.‑- RCW (sections 2 through 19 of this act).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 27. A new section is added to chapter 90.52 RCW to read as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement under this chapter, including any standard, limitation, rule, or order is superseded and replaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of an environmental excellence program agreement, entered into under chapter 43.‑- RCW (sections 2 through 19 of this act).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 28. A new section is added to chapter 90.58 RCW to read as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement under this chapter, including any standard, limitation, rule, or order is superseded and replaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of an environmental excellence program agreement, entered into under chapter 43.‑- RCW (sections 2 through 19 of this act).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 29. A new section is added to chapter 90.64 RCW to read as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement under this chapter, including any standard, limitation, rule, or order is superseded and replaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of an environmental excellence program agreement, entered into under chapter 43.‑- RCW (sections 2 through 19 of this act).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 30. A new section is added to chapter 90.71 RCW to read as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement under this chapter, including any standard, limitation, rule, or order is superseded and replaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of an environmental excellence program agreement, entered into under chapter 43.‑- RCW (sections 2 through 19 of this act).
*Sec. 31. RCW 90.54.020 and 1989 c 348 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
Utilization and management of the waters of the state shall be guided by the following general declaration of fundamentals:
(1) Uses of water for domestic, stock watering, industrial, commercial, agricultural, irrigation, hydroelectric power production, mining, fish and wildlife maintenance and enhancement, recreational, and thermal power production purposes, and preservation of environmental and aesthetic values, and all other uses compatible with the enjoyment of the public waters of the state, are declared to be beneficial.
(2) Allocation of waters among potential uses and users shall be based generally on the securing of the maximum net benefits for the people of the state. Maximum net benefits shall constitute total benefits less costs including opportunities lost.
(3) The quality of the natural environment shall be protected and, where possible, enhanced as follows:
(a) Perennial rivers and streams of the state shall be retained with base flows necessary to provide for preservation of wildlife, fish, scenic, aesthetic and other environmental values, and navigational values. Lakes and ponds shall be retained substantially in their natural condition. Withdrawals of water which would conflict therewith shall be authorized only in those situations where it is clear that overriding considerations of the public interest will be served.
(b) Waters of the state shall be of high quality. Regardless of the quality of the waters of the state, all wastes and other materials and substances proposed for entry into said waters shall be provided with all known, available, and reasonable methods of treatment prior to entry. Notwithstanding that standards of quality established for the waters of the state would not be violated, wastes and other materials and substances shall not be allowed to enter such waters which will reduce the existing quality thereof, except in those situations where it is clear that overriding considerations of the public interest will be served. Technology-based effluent limitations or standards for discharges for municipal water treatment plants located on the Chehalis, Columbia, Cowlitz, Lewis, or Skagit river shall be adjusted to reflect credit for substances removed from the plant intake water if:
(i) The municipality demonstrates that the intake water is drawn from the same body of water into which the discharge is made; and
(ii) The municipality demonstrates that no violation of receiving water quality standards or appreciable environmental degradation will result.
(4) Adequate and safe supplies of water shall be preserved and protected in potable condition to satisfy human domestic needs.
(5) Multiple-purpose impoundment structures are to be preferred over single-purpose structures. Due regard shall be given to means and methods for protection of fishery resources in the planning for and construction of water impoundment structures and other artificial obstructions.
(6) Federal, state, and local governments, individuals, corporations, groups and other entities shall be encouraged to carry out practices of conservation as they relate to the use of the waters of the state. In addition to traditional development approaches, improved water use efficiency and conservation shall be emphasized in the management of the state's water resources and in some cases will be a potential new source of water with which to meet future needs throughout the state.
(7) Development of water supply systems, whether publicly or privately owned, which provide water to the public generally in regional areas within the state shall be encouraged. Development of water supply systems for multiple domestic use which will not serve the public generally shall be discouraged where water supplies are available from water systems serving the public.
(8) Full recognition shall be given in the administration of water allocation and use programs to the natural interrelationships of surface and ground waters.
(9) Expressions of the public interest will be sought at all stages of water planning and allocation discussions.
(10) Water management programs, including but not limited to, water quality, flood control, drainage, erosion control and storm runoff are deemed to be in the public interest.
(11) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any legal requirement under subsection (3)(b) of this section is superseded and replaced in accordance with the terms and provisions of an environmental excellence program agreement, entered into under chapter 43.‑- RCW (sections 2 through 19 of this act).
*Sec. 31 was vetoed. See message at end of chapter.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 32. The environmental excellence account is hereby created in the state treasury. All fees and voluntary contributions collected by state agencies under section 18 of this act shall be deposited into the account. Moneys in the account may be spent only after appropriation. Expenditures from the account may be used only for purposes consistent with the environmental excellence program created under sections 2 through 19 of this act. Moneys in the account may be appropriated to each agency in an amount equal to the amount each agency collects and deposits into the account.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 33. Sections 2 through 19 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 43 RCW.
Passed the House April 22, 1997.
Passed the Senate April 18, 1997.
Approved by the Governor May 15, 1997, with the exception of certain items that were vetoed.
Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 15, 1997.
Note: Governor's explanation of partial veto is as follows:
"I am returning herewith, without my approval as to sections 11, 15, and 31, Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1866 entitled:
"AN ACT Relating to the establishment of voluntary programs creating environmental excellence program agreements;"
Since I assumed office, I have emphasized the importance of effective and efficient government. The two Executive Orders that I have signed dealt with improving government service by working smarter and finding ways to reduce costs.
One element of better performance is a willingness to be innovative and creative in the pursuit of objectives. Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1866 reflects just such an approach. It promotes a more efficient and results-oriented regulatory system for state, local and regional agencies that administer a host of environmental and resource protection laws. The bill allows agencies - after careful consultation with all affected stakeholders - to sign agreements with those they regulate that contain conditions different from those that would be imposed under existing statutes.
I am well aware that there is concern about this legislation and that it is perceived to hold the potential for our losing ground in our decades-long effort to protect Washington's precious environment. However, I think there is substantial merit in this bill as adopted by the 1997 Legislature. I am well aware of the tremendous effort that went into amending it throughout the session to accommodate many of the concerns expressed about the early versions.
At the same time as I act on this bill, I am charging the director of the Department of Ecology with the difficult task of rebuilding some of the trust that may have been lost during the course of the debate over House Bill No. 1866. I have tremendous confidence in his ability to bring together parties with strongly felt opposing views, and seek common ground. I have asked the Director and his staff to initiate a process of developing guidance for implementation of the Environmental Excellence Program - guidance that can fill some gaps in the legislation and help create confidence that the bill will not become a path toward lower standards of resource protection.
While I have signed the majority of Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1866, there are three provisions that necessitate a veto. These are sections 11, 15, and 31.
Section 11 addresses termination of Environmental Excellence Program Agreements. It specifies that one of the bases for such termination decisions is that "the operation of the facility under the agreement has caused endangerment to public health or the environment that cannot be remedied by modification of the agreement...." It then goes on to state that if an Agreement is terminated, the regulatory agency can impose interim requirements no less stringent than those which would apply in the absence of an agreement. However, the facility is not obligated to comply with these interim requirements until they have exhausted all judicial review.
This is simply unacceptable. If the operation of a facility is endangering the public health or our environment, it cannot be allowed to continue unchecked while an agency tries to modify the agreement to remedy the problem, terminates the agreement and responds to possibly years of legal challenges. A provision must be made for imposing alternate regulatory requirements on a much shorter timetable than specified in section 11. This is one of the issues I have asked Director Fitzsimmons to explore in developing guidance for this program.
Section 15 exempts Environmental Excellence Program Agreements from the State Environmental Policy Act. SEPA allows the public and decision-makers to become aware of the environmental consequences of their decisions and to look at alternate ways of achieving the same objective. If Agreements under this statute are to achieve equal or better environmental performance, nothing that would be revealed through the SEPA process should hamper completion of an agreement. The added opportunity for public consultation should assuage some of the fears expressed that agencies and project sponsors will reach decisions without adequate consideration of the concerns of neighbors, employees, or citizen groups.
Section 31 amends the 1971 Water Resources Act. For 26 years, Washington has had one of the strongest laws in the nation to prevent degradation of our water quality. Under this law, no discharges into state waters are allowed if they would reduce existing water quality. This seems a minimal standard to impose on any waste discharger. But section 31 would allow an Environmental Excellence Program Agreement to supersede this requirement. This is unacceptable and unnecessary in light of section 3 of the bill. Under that section, every agreement to be signed must produce results equal to or better than what would be produced under current standards and requirements. Thus, no agreement could ever arise that would result in a degradation of the state's water quality. For this reason, I have vetoed section 31.
I have today sent a letter to the Director of the Department of Ecology spelling out the issues and approach to be used in developing guidance for implementing Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1866. This should address many of the concerns that have been raised by opponents of the bill without undermining its objectives.
I emphasize to all those who have been involved with this legislation that it is a 5-year trial. No new agreements can be made after July 2002 unless the Legislature extends the program. Thus we have a window of opportunity to change the way we do business and to demonstrate that new ways are not necessarily worse than the old ways. I urge those on all sides to keep in mind a shared objective of environmental excellence for all of Washington's citizens in a healthy economic climate where business and government operate with the greatest possible efficiency.
For these reasons, I have vetoed sections 11, 15, and 31 of Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1866.
With the exception of sections 11, 15, and 31, I am approving Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1866."