CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT
ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2596
Chapter 112, Laws of 1998
55th Legislature
1998 Regular Session
MASTER PLANNED RESORTS--REVISIONS
EFFECTIVE DATE: 6/11/98
Passed by the House March 9, 1998 Yeas 76 Nays 20
CLYDE BALLARD Speaker of the House of Representatives
Passed by the Senate March 5, 1998 Yeas 42 Nays 6 |
CERTIFICATE
I, Timothy A. Martin, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2596 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth. |
BRAD OWEN President of the Senate |
TIMOTHY A. MARTIN Chief Clerk
|
Approved March 23, 1998 |
FILED
March 23, 1998 - 4:26 p.m. |
|
|
GARY LOCKE Governor of the State of Washington |
Secretary of State State of Washington |
_______________________________________________
ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2596
_______________________________________________
AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE
Passed Legislature - 1998 Regular Session
State of Washington 55th Legislature 1998 Regular Session
By House Committee on House Government Reform & Land Use (originally sponsored by Representatives Chandler, Reams, Gardner, Lantz and Mulliken)
Read first time 01/28/98. Referred to Committee on .
AN ACT Relating to master planned resorts; amending RCW 36.70A.360; and creating a new section.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The primary intent of this act is to give effect to recommendations by the 1994 department of community, trade, and economic development's master planned resort task force by clarifying that master planned resorts may make use of capital facilities, utilities, and services provided by outside service providers, and may enter into agreements for shared facilities with such providers, when all costs directly attributable to the resort, including capacity increases, are fully borne by the resort.
Sec. 2. RCW 36.70A.360 and 1991 sp.s. c 32 s 17 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 may permit master planned resorts which may constitute urban growth outside of urban growth areas as limited by this section. A master planned resort means a self-contained and fully integrated planned unit development, in a setting of significant natural amenities, with primary focus on destination resort facilities consisting of short-term visitor accommodations associated with a range of developed on-site indoor or outdoor recreational facilities.
(2) Capital facilities, utilities, and services, including those related to sewer, water, storm water, security, fire suppression, and emergency medical, provided on-site shall be limited to meeting the needs of the master planned resort. Such facilities, utilities, and services may be provided to a master planned resort by outside service providers, including municipalities and special purpose districts, provided that all costs associated with service extensions and capacity increases directly attributable to the master planned resort are fully borne by the resort. A master planned resort and service providers may enter into agreements for shared capital facilities and utilities, provided that such facilities and utilities serve only the master planned resort or urban growth areas.
Nothing in this subsection may be construed as: Establishing an order of priority for processing applications for water right permits, for granting such permits, or for issuing certificates of water right; altering or authorizing in any manner the alteration of the place of use for a water right; or affecting or impairing in any manner whatsoever an existing water right.
All waters or the use of waters shall be regulated and controlled as provided in chapters 90.03 and 90.44 RCW and not otherwise.
(3) A master planned resort may include other residential uses within its boundaries, but only if the residential uses are integrated into and support the on-site recreational nature of the resort.
(4) A master planned resort may be authorized by a county only if:
(((1)))
(a) The comprehensive plan specifically identifies policies to guide the
development of master planned resorts;
(((2)))
(b) The comprehensive plan and development regulations include
restrictions that preclude new urban or suburban land uses in the vicinity of
the master planned resort, except in areas otherwise designated for urban
growth under RCW 36.70A.110;
(((3)))
(c) The county includes a finding as a part of the approval process that
the land is better suited, and has more long-term importance, for the master
planned resort than for the commercial harvesting of timber or agricultural
production, if located on land that otherwise would be designated as forest
land or agricultural land under RCW 36.70A.170;
(((4)))
(d) The county ensures that the resort plan is consistent with the
development regulations established for critical areas; and
(((5)))
(e) On-site and off-site infrastructure and service impacts are
fully considered and mitigated.
Passed the House March 9, 1998.
Passed the Senate March 5, 1998.
Approved by the Governor March 23, 1998.
Filed in Office of Secretary of State March 23, 1998.