HOUSE BILL REPORT

                  HB 2867

 

             As Reported By House Committee On:

                    Agriculture & Ecology

 

Title:  An act relating to underground water storage.

 

Brief Description:  Defining a "reservoir" to include an underground geological formation.

 

Sponsors:  Representatives Linville, G. Chandler, Miloscia, Mitchell, Koster and Cooper.

 

Brief History:

  Committee Activity:

Agriculture & Ecology:  2/4/00 [DPS].

 

           Brief Summary of Substitute Bill

 

$Authorizes permits for projects that artificially store water in underground natural formations as part of artificial storage and recovery projects.

 

$Establishes a $2,500 permit fee, provides for reimbursement of the fee in certain circumstances, and requires applicant-initiated studies.

 

 

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE & ECOLOGY

 

Majority Report:  The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass.  Signed by 14 members:  Representatives G. Chandler, Republican Co-Chair; Linville, Democratic Co-Chair; Cooper, Democratic Vice Chair; Koster, Republican Vice Chair; Anderson; B. Chandler; Delvin; Fortunato; Grant; Reardon; Schoesler; Stensen; Sump and Wood.

 

Staff:  Kenneth Hirst (786-7105).

 

Background: 

 

Under the groundwater code, the Department of Ecology (DOE) may limit withdrawal by appropriators of groundwater to maintain a safe sustaining yield of water from a groundwater source for senior appropriators.  For this purpose, the DOE may designate groundwater areas or sub-areas and may also designate separate depth zones within such an area or sub-area to control the withdrawal.  If the DOE makes such a designation, a person claiming to be the owner of artificially stored groundwater within such an area, sub-area, or zone must file a declaration to that effect with the DOE.

 

Applications for reservoir permits are filed under the surface water code with the DOE.  A person wishing to use any water stored in a reservoir must file an application for a secondary permit and provide evidence that an agreement has been entered into with the owners of the reservoir for enough water for the secondary permit.

 

 

Summary of Substitute Bill: 

 

The "reservoirs" for which permits may be processed now include natural underground formations where water, including reclaimed water, may be stored and used as part of an artificial storage and recovery project.  For such a project, the water may be stored by injection or surface spreading and infiltration.  To qualify, the underground formation must meet standards for review and mitigation established by the DOE by rule.  The issues to be addressed in this review and mitigation are:  aquifer vulnerability and hydraulic continuity, geo-technical impacts, chemical compatibility of surface and ground waters, recharge and recovery treatment requirements, system operation water rights, and environmental impacts.

 

Analysis of such a project and geological formation must be conducted through studies initiated by the applicant under the direction and review of the DOE.  A permit filing and examination fee for such a project is established.  The fee is $2,500, but may be reimbursed if the permit is issued and the project conveys a trust water right to the state.

 

An artificial storage and recovery project does not apply to water artificially stored as a result of irrigation seepage losses or to artificially stored water that may be claimed when a groundwater sub-area is established.

 

Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:  The original bill expanded the definition of "reservoir" to include an underground formation.  The remaining provisions are provided by the substitute bill.

 

 

Appropriation:  None.

 

Fiscal Note:  Not requested.

 

Effective Date of Substitute Bill:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

 

Testimony For:  (Original bill):  1)  This is an innovative storage ideas.  It should not be limited to just one type of project but be flexible enough to allow cooperative agreements among a number of water right holders.  2)  The Lakehaven Utility District is proposing an "oasis" project for storing 30,000 acre feet of water underground.

 

(With concerns)  (Original bill):  Care should be taken not to alter unintentionally the requirements for surface storage projects.

 

Testimony Against:  None.

 

Testified:  (In support) (Original bill):  Mark Triplett and Mike Krautkramer, Lakehaven Utility District.

 

(With concerns) (Original bill):  Dick Ducharme, Building Industry Association of Washington; and Kathleen Collins, Washington Water Policy Alliance.