CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT
ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 2015
56th Legislature
1999 Regular Session
Passed by the House April 23, 1999 Yeas 96 Nays 0
Speaker of the House of Representatives
Speaker of the House of Representatives
Passed by the Senate April 15, 1999 Yeas 44 Nays 4 |
CERTIFICATE
We, Dean R. Foster and Timothy A. Martin, Co-Chief Clerks of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 2015 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.
Chief Clerk
Chief Clerk |
President of the Senate |
|
Approved |
FILED |
|
|
Governor of the State of Washington |
Secretary of State State of Washington |
_______________________________________________
ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 2015
_______________________________________________
AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE
Passed Legislature - 1999 Regular Session
State of Washington 56th Legislature 1999 Regular Session
By Representatives Radcliff, Wolfe, Lambert, Romero, DeBolt, Morris, Constantine, Ruderman, D. Schmidt, Crouse, Carrell, Poulsen, Miloscia and Rockefeller; by request of Department of General Administration and Department of Information Services
Read first time 02/12/1999. Referred to Committee on Judiciary.
AN ACT Relating to restricting liability for harm caused by incorrectly calculated or interpreted dates associated with year 2000 date-changes processed by electronic computing devices; adding a new section to chapter 4.22 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 4.24 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 48.18 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 51.04 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 82.32 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 84.56 RCW; providing expiration dates; and declaring an emergency.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 4.22 RCW to read as follows:
(1) The definitions in this section apply throughout this section and sections 2 through 5 of this act.
(a) "Agency" means any state or local government board, commission, bureau, committee, department, institution, division, or tribunal in the legislative, executive, or judicial branch, including elective and legislative offices, institutions of higher education created and supported by state government, counties, cities, towns, special purpose districts, local service districts, municipal corporations, quasi-municipal corporations, and political subdivisions of such agencies and corporations, and any officer, employee, or agent of these entities acting within the scope of the officer, employee, or agent's employment or duties. "Agency" does not include municipal electric or gas utilities formed under Title 35 RCW or electric public utility districts formed under Title 54 RCW.
(b) "Electric cooperative utility" means any nonprofit, member-owned cooperative organized under chapter 23.86 RCW and engaged in the business of distributing electric energy in the state.
(c) "Electric mutual utility" means any nonprofit, member-owned corporation or association organized under chapter 24.06 RCW and engaged in the business of distributing electric energy in the state.
(d) "Electronic computing device" means any computer hardware or software, computer chip, embedded chip, process control equipment, or other information system used to capture, store, manipulate, or process data, or that controls, monitors, or assists in the operation of physical apparatus that is not primarily used as a computer, but that relies on automation or digital technology to function, including but not limited to vehicles, vessels, buildings, structures, facilities, elevators, medical equipment, traffic signals, factory machinery, and the like.
(e) "Public service provider" means any municipal electric or gas utility formed under Title 35 RCW, electric public utility district formed under Title 54 RCW, electrical company, as defined in RCW 80.04.010, gas company, as defined in RCW 80.04.010, electric cooperative utility, and electric mutual utility.
(f) "Year 2000 failure" means with respect to an electronic computing device, a computing failure that prevents such electronic computing device from accurately interpreting, producing, computing, generating, accounting for, processing, calculating, comparing, or sequencing date or time data from, into, or between the years 1999 and 2000, or with regard to leap year calculations.
(2) In any action against an agency or public service provider, whether based in tort, contract, or otherwise, for damages caused in whole or in part by computational or interpretive errors generated by an electronic computing device in connection with a year 2000 failure:
(a) Any liability shall be several, not joint, and the liability shall be determined as a percentage of fault in a manner consistent with RCW 4.22.070; and
(b) Agencies as defined in this section shall have no liability for the first one hundred dollars of damages per claimant that would otherwise be owed by the agency.
(3) This section shall not apply to any action for damages arising from bodily personal injury, or to wrongful death and survival actions under chapter 4.20 RCW or RCW 4.24.010.
(4) This section does not apply to any claim or cause of action filed after December 31, 2003.
(5) This section expires December 31, 2009.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 4.24 RCW to read as follows:
(1) A person has an affirmative defense to any claim or action, based on a contract, brought against the person if he or she establishes that:
(a) The default, failure to pay, breach, omission, or other violation that is the basis of the claim against him or her was caused, in whole or in part, by a year 2000 failure associated with an electronic computing device;
(b) The year 2000 failure being asserted was not proximately caused by a failure of the person to update an electronic computing device, that is under his or her dominion or control, to be year 2000 compliant; and
(c) If it were not for the year 2000 failure, the person would have been able to satisfy the contractual obligation that was the basis of the claim.
(2) If an affirmative defense as set forth in subsection (1) of this section is established, then the person or entity making the claim may not reassert the claim against which the affirmative defense was asserted for a period of thirty days from the date on which the court dismissed the case as a result of the affirmative defense. Any statute of limitations applicable to the claim shall be tolled for forty-five days upon the dismissal of the case under this section.
(3) The dismissal of an action as the result of the affirmative defense under this section does not impair, extinguish, discharge, satisfy, or otherwise affect the underlying obligation that is the basis of the claim against which the affirmative defense was asserted. However, the ability of a party to bring the claim based upon the obligation is delayed as set forth in subsection (2) of this section.
(4) A person who has established an affirmative defense as set forth in subsection (1) of this section may dispute directly with a credit reporting agency operating in this state any item of information in the person's consumer file relating to the subject of the affirmative defense. The dispute shall be filed in accordance with RCW 19.182.090(6). If requested by the person under this subsection (4), the credit reporting agency shall furnish a statement, made in accordance with RCW 19.182.090(7), to the person and include the statement in the person's consumer file. The credit reporting agency may not charge the person a fee for the inclusion of this statement in the person's consumer file.
(5)(a) The definitions in section 1 of this act apply to this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(b) As used in this section, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, "person" means a natural person or a small business as defined in RCW 19.85.020.
(6) This section does not affect those transactions upon which a default has occurred before any disruption of financial or data transfer operations attributable to a year 2000 failure.
(7) This section does not apply to or affect any contract that specifically provides for a year 2000 failure.
(8) This section does not apply to any claim or cause of action filed after December 31, 2003.
(9) This section expires December 31, 2006.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 48.18 RCW to read as follows:
(1) An insurer shall reinstate back to the effective date of cancellation, with no penalties or interest, any personal lines insurance policy, subject to this chapter, that was canceled for nonpayment of premium, if the named insured:
(a) Provides notice to the insurer, no later than ten days after the effective date of cancellation, that the failure to pay the premium due for the insurance policy is caused by a year 2000 failure associated with an electronic computing device that is not under the named insured's dominion or control;
(b) Establishes that a year 2000 failure occurred and that if it were not for the year 2000 failure, the named insured would have been able to pay the premium due in a timely manner;
(c) Makes a premium payment to bring the insurance policy current as soon as possible, but no later than ten days after the year 2000 failure has been corrected or reasonably should have been corrected.
(2) If the named insured fails to pay the premium due within ten days after the year 2000 failure has been corrected or reasonably should have been corrected, the insurer's previous notice of cancellation for nonpayment of premium remains effective.
(3)(a) The definitions in section 1 of this act apply to this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(b) As used in this section, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, "named insurer" means a natural person or a small business as defined in RCW 19.85.020.
(4) This section does not effect the cancellation of any insurance policy that is unrelated to a year 2000 failure, or occurs before any disruption of financial or data transfer operations attributable to the year 2000 failure.
(5) This section does not apply to any claim or cause of action filed after December 31, 2003.
(6) This section expires December 31, 2006.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. A new section is added to chapter 51.04 RCW to read as follows:
(1) No interest or penalties shall be imposed on any employer because of the failure to pay any premium required by this title to be made to the state treasury for the accident fund, the medical aid fund, the supplemental pension fund, or any other fund created under this title if the employer establishes that:
(a) The failure to pay was caused, in whole or in part, by a year 2000 failure associated with an electronic computing device;
(b) The year 2000 failure being asserted was not proximately caused by a failure of the employer to update an electronic computing device, that is under his or her dominion or control, to be year 2000 compliant; and
(c) If it were not for the year 2000 failure, the employer would have been able to satisfy the payment of premiums in a timely manner.
Payment of such premiums shall be made within thirty days after the year 2000 failure has been corrected or reasonably should have been corrected.
(2)(a) The definitions in section 1 of this act apply to this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(b) As used in this section, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, "employer" means a natural person or a small business as defined in RCW 19.85.020.
(3) This section does not affect those transactions upon which a default has occurred before any disruption of financial or data transfer operations attributable to a year 2000 failure.
(4) This section does not apply to any claim or cause of action filed after December 31, 2003.
(5) This section expires December 31, 2006.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. A new section is added to chapter 82.32 RCW to read as follows:
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision in this chapter, no interest or penalties may be imposed on any person because of the failure to pay excise taxes on or before the date due for payment if the person establishes that:
(a) The failure to pay was caused, in whole or in part, by a year 2000 failure associated with an electronic computing device;
(b) The year 2000 failure being asserted was not proximately caused by a failure of the person to update an electronic computing device, that is under his or her dominion or control, to be year 2000 compliant; and
(c) If it were not for the year 2000 failure, the person would have been able to satisfy the payment of taxes in a timely manner.
Payment of such taxes shall be made within thirty days after the year 2000 failure has been corrected or reasonably should have been corrected.
(2)(a) The definitions in section 1 of this act apply to this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(b) As used in this section, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, "person" means a natural person or a small business as defined in RCW 19.85.020.
(3) This section does not affect those transactions upon which a default has occurred before any disruption of financial or data transfer operations attributable to a year 2000 failure.
(4) This section does not apply to any claim or cause of action filed after December 31, 2003.
(5) This section expires December 31, 2006.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. A new section is added to chapter 84.56 RCW to read as follows:
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision in this chapter, no interest or penalties may be imposed on any person because of the failure to pay real or personal property taxes on or before the date due for payment if the person establishes that:
(a) The failure to pay was caused, in whole or in part, by a year 2000 failure associated with an electronic computing device;
(b) The year 2000 failure being asserted was not proximately caused by a failure of the person to update an electronic computing device, that is under his or her dominion or control, to be year 2000 compliant; and
(c) If it were not for the year 2000 failure, the person would have been able to satisfy the payment of taxes in a timely manner.
Payment of such taxes shall be made within thirty days after the year 2000 failure has been corrected or reasonably should have been corrected.
(2)(a) The definitions in section 1 of this act apply to this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(b) As used in this section, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, "person" means a natural person or a small business as defined in RCW 19.85.020.
(3) This section does not affect those transactions upon which a default has occurred before any disruption of financial or data transfer operations attributable to a year 2000 failure.
(4) This section does not apply to any claim or cause of action filed after December 31, 2003.
(5) This section expires December 31, 2006.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately.
--- END ---