S-1823.1  _______________________________________________

 

                    SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5433

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      56th Legislature     1999 Regular Session

 

By Senate Committee on Environmental Quality & Water Resources (originally sponsored by Senators Fraser and Rasmussen)

 

Read first time 02/25/1999.

Requiring comprehensive solid waste management plans to consider handling, transport, and disposal of biomedical waste.


    AN ACT Relating to solid waste management plans; amending RCW 70.95.090; and creating a new section.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  It is the intent of the legislature that county and city solid waste management plans incorporate a program for the safe handling of biomedical waste on the next scheduled revision or update of the solid waste management plan.

 

    Sec. 2.  RCW 70.95.090 and 1991 c 298 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:

    Each county and city comprehensive solid waste management plan shall include the following:

    (1) A detailed inventory and description of all existing solid waste handling facilities including an inventory of any deficiencies in meeting current solid waste handling needs.

    (2) The estimated long-range needs for solid waste handling facilities projected twenty years into the future.

    (3) A program for the orderly development of solid waste handling facilities in a manner consistent with the plans for the entire county which shall:

    (a) Meet the minimum functional standards for solid waste handling adopted by the department and all laws and regulations relating to air and water pollution, fire prevention, flood control, and protection of public health;

    (b) Take into account the comprehensive land use plan of each jurisdiction;

    (c) Contain a six year construction and capital acquisition program for solid waste handling facilities; and

    (d) Contain a plan for financing both capital costs and operational expenditures of the proposed solid waste management system.

    (4) A program for the safe handling, transport, and disposal of biomedical waste, as defined in RCW 70.95K.010.  The program shall specify how biomedical waste will be segregated from other solid waste.

    (5) A program for surveillance and control.

    (((5))) (6) A current inventory and description of solid waste collection needs and operations within each respective jurisdiction which shall include:

    (a) Any franchise for solid waste collection granted by the utilities and transportation commission in the respective jurisdictions including the name of the holder of the franchise and the address of his or her place of business and the area covered by the franchise;

    (b) Any city solid waste operation within the county and the boundaries of such operation;

    (c) The population density of each area serviced by a city operation or by a franchised operation within the respective jurisdictions;

    (d) The projected solid waste collection needs for the respective jurisdictions for the next six years.

    (((6))) (7) A comprehensive waste reduction and recycling element that, in accordance with the priorities established in RCW 70.95.010, provides programs that (a) reduce the amount of waste generated, (b) provide incentives and mechanisms for source separation, and (c) establish recycling opportunities for the source separated waste.

    (((7))) (8) The waste reduction and recycling element shall include the following:

    (a) Waste reduction strategies;

    (b) Source separation strategies, including:

    (i) Programs for the collection of source separated materials from residences in urban and rural areas.  In urban areas, these programs shall include collection of source separated recyclable materials from single and multiple family residences, unless the department approves an alternative program, according to the criteria in the planning guidelines.  Such criteria shall include:  Anticipated recovery rates and levels of public participation, availability of environmentally sound disposal capacity, access to markets for recyclable materials, unreasonable cost impacts on the ratepayer over the six-year planning period, utilization of environmentally sound waste reduction and recycling technologies, and other factors as appropriate.  In rural areas, these programs shall include but not be limited to drop-off boxes, buy-back centers, or a combination of both, at each solid waste transfer, processing, or disposal site, or at locations convenient to the residents of the county.  The drop-off boxes and buy-back centers may be owned or operated by public, nonprofit, or private persons;

    (ii) Programs to monitor the collection of source separated waste at nonresidential sites where there is sufficient density to sustain a program;

    (iii) Programs to collect yard waste, if the county or city submitting the plan finds that there are adequate markets or capacity for composted yard waste within or near the service area to consume the majority of the material collected; and

    (iv) Programs to educate and promote the concepts of waste reduction and recycling;

    (c) Recycling strategies, including a description of markets for recyclables, a review of waste generation trends, a description of waste composition, a discussion and description of existing programs and any additional programs needed to assist public and private sector recycling, and an implementation schedule for the designation of specific materials to be collected for recycling, and for the provision of recycling collection services;

    (d) Other information the county or city submitting the plan determines is necessary.

    (((8))) (9) An assessment of the plan's impact on the costs of solid waste collection.  The assessment shall be prepared in conformance with guidelines established by the utilities and transportation commission.  The commission shall cooperate with the Washington state association of counties and the association of Washington cities in establishing such guidelines.

    (((9))) (10) A review of potential areas that meet the criteria as outlined in RCW 70.95.165.

 


                            --- END ---