S-2032.1 _______________________________________________
SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5520
_______________________________________________
State of Washington 56th Legislature 1999 Regular Session
By Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections (originally sponsored by Senators Costa, McCaslin, Kohl‑Welles, Winsley and McAuliffe)
Read first time 03/03/99.
AN ACT Relating to a juvenile offender community sanction sentencing alternative; amending RCW 13.40.0357 and 13.40.077; reenacting and amending RCW 13.40.160; adding new sections to chapter 13.40 RCW; and prescribing penalties.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1. RCW 13.40.0357 and 1998 c 290 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:
DESCRIPTION AND OFFENSE CATEGORY
juvenile juvenile disposition
disposition category for attempt,
offense bailjump, conspiracy,
category description (rcw citation) or solicitation
........................................
Arson and Malicious Mischief
A Arson 1 (9A.48.020) B+
B Arson 2 (9A.48.030) C
C Reckless Burning 1 (9A.48.040) D
D Reckless Burning 2 (9A.48.050) E
B Malicious Mischief 1 (9A.48.070) C
C Malicious Mischief 2 (9A.48.080) D
D Malicious Mischief 3 (<$50 is
E class) (9A.48.090) E
E Tampering with Fire Alarm
Apparatus (9.40.100) E
A Possession of Incendiary Device
(9.40.120) B+
Assault and Other Crimes
Involving Physical Harm
A Assault 1 (9A.36.011) B+
B+ Assault 2 (9A.36.021) C+
C+ Assault 3 (9A.36.031) D+
D+ Assault 4 (9A.36.041) E
B+ Drive-By Shooting
(9A.36.045) C+
D+ Reckless Endangerment
(9A.36.050) E
C+ Promoting Suicide Attempt
(9A.36.060) D+
D+ Coercion (9A.36.070) E
C+ Custodial Assault (9A.36.100) D+
Burglary and Trespass
B+ Burglary 1 (9A.52.020) C+
B Residential Burglary
(9A.52.025) C
B Burglary 2 (9A.52.030) C
D Burglary Tools (Possession of)
(9A.52.060) E
D Criminal Trespass 1 (9A.52.070) E
E Criminal Trespass 2 (9A.52.080) E
C Vehicle Prowling 1 (9A.52.095) D
D Vehicle Prowling 2 (9A.52.100) E
Drugs
E Possession/Consumption of Alcohol
(66.44.270) E
C Illegally Obtaining Legend Drug
(69.41.020) D
C+ Sale, Delivery, Possession of Legend
Drug with Intent to Sell
(69.41.030) D+
E Possession of Legend Drug
(69.41.030) E
B+ Violation of Uniform Controlled
Substances Act - Narcotic,
Methamphetamine, or Flunitrazepam
Sale (69.50.401(a)(1) (i) or (ii)) B+
C Violation of Uniform Controlled
Substances Act - Nonnarcotic Sale
(69.50.401(a)(1)(iii)) C
E Possession of Marihuana <40 grams
(69.50.401(e)) E
C Fraudulently Obtaining Controlled
Substance (69.50.403) C
C+ Sale of Controlled Substance
for Profit (69.50.410) C+
E Unlawful Inhalation (9.47A.020) E
B Violation of Uniform Controlled
Substances Act - Narcotic,
Methamphetamine, or Flunitrazepam
Counterfeit Substances
(69.50.401(b)(1) (i) or (ii)) B
C Violation of Uniform Controlled
Substances Act - Nonnarcotic
Counterfeit Substances
(69.50.401(b)(1) (iii), (iv), (v)) C
C Violation of Uniform Controlled
Substances Act - Possession of a
Controlled Substance
(69.50.401(d)) C
C Violation of Uniform Controlled
Substances Act - Possession of a
Controlled Substance
(69.50.401(c)) C
Firearms and Weapons
B Theft of Firearm (9A.56.300) C
B Possession of Stolen Firearm
(9A.56.310) C
E Carrying Loaded Pistol Without
Permit (9.41.050) E
C Possession of Firearms by Minor (<18)
(9.41.040(1)(b)(iii)) C
D+ Possession of Dangerous Weapon
(9.41.250) E
D Intimidating Another Person by use
of Weapon (9.41.270) E
Homicide
A+ Murder 1 (9A.32.030) A
A+ Murder 2 (9A.32.050) B+
B+ Manslaughter 1 (9A.32.060) C+
C+ Manslaughter 2 (9A.32.070) D+
B+ Vehicular Homicide (46.61.520) C+
Kidnapping
A Kidnap 1 (9A.40.020) B+
B+ Kidnap 2 (9A.40.030) C+
C+ Unlawful Imprisonment
(9A.40.040) D+
Obstructing Governmental Operation
D Obstructing a Law Enforcement
Officer (9A.76.020) E
E Resisting Arrest (9A.76.040) E
B Introducing Contraband 1
(9A.76.140) C
C Introducing Contraband 2
(9A.76.150) D
E Introducing Contraband 3
(9A.76.160) E
B+ Intimidating a Public Servant
(9A.76.180) C+
B+ Intimidating a Witness
(9A.72.110) C+
Public Disturbance
C+ Riot with Weapon (9A.84.010) D+
D+ Riot Without Weapon
(9A.84.010) E
E Failure to Disperse (9A.84.020) E
E Disorderly Conduct (9A.84.030) E
Sex Crimes
A Rape 1 (9A.44.040) B+
A- Rape 2 (9A.44.050) B+
C+ Rape 3 (9A.44.060) D+
A- Rape of a Child 1 (9A.44.073) B+
B+ Rape of a Child 2 (9A.44.076) C+
B Incest 1 (9A.64.020(1)) C
C Incest 2 (9A.64.020(2)) D
D+ Indecent Exposure
(Victim <14) (9A.88.010) E
E Indecent Exposure
(Victim 14 or over) (9A.88.010) E
B+ Promoting Prostitution 1
(9A.88.070) C+
C+ Promoting Prostitution 2
(9A.88.080) D+
E O & A (Prostitution) (9A.88.030) E
B+ Indecent Liberties (9A.44.100) C+
A- Child Molestation 1 (9A.44.083) B+
B Child Molestation 2 (9A.44.086) C+
Theft, Robbery, Extortion, and Forgery
B Theft 1 (9A.56.030) C
C Theft 2 (9A.56.040) D
D Theft 3 (9A.56.050) E
B Theft of Livestock (9A.56.080) C
C Forgery (9A.60.020) D
A Robbery 1 (9A.56.200) B+
B+ Robbery 2 (9A.56.210) C+
B+ Extortion 1 (9A.56.120) C+
C+ Extortion 2 (9A.56.130) D+
B Possession of Stolen Property 1
(9A.56.150) C
C Possession of Stolen Property 2
(9A.56.160) D
D Possession of Stolen Property 3
(9A.56.170) E
C Taking Motor Vehicle Without
Owner's Permission (9A.56.070) D
Motor Vehicle Related Crimes
E Driving Without a License
(46.20.005) E
C Hit and Run - Injury
(46.52.020(4)) D
D Hit and Run-Attended
(46.52.020(5)) E
E Hit and Run-Unattended
(46.52.010) E
C Vehicular Assault (46.61.522) D
C Attempting to Elude Pursuing
Police Vehicle (46.61.024) D
E Reckless Driving (46.61.500) E
D Driving While Under the Influence
(46.61.502 and 46.61.504) E
Other
B Bomb Threat (9.61.160) C
C Escape 11 (9A.76.110) C
C Escape 21 (9A.76.120) C
D Escape 3 (9A.76.130) E
E Obscene, Harassing, Etc.,
Phone Calls (9.61.230) E
A Other Offense Equivalent to an
Adult Class A Felony B+
B Other Offense Equivalent to an
Adult Class B Felony C
C Other Offense Equivalent to an
Adult Class C Felony D
D Other Offense Equivalent to an
Adult Gross Misdemeanor E
E Other Offense Equivalent to an
Adult Misdemeanor E
V Violation of Order of Restitution,
Community Supervision, or
Confinement (13.40.200)2 V
1Escape 1 and 2 and Attempted Escape 1 and 2 are classed as C offenses and the standard range is established as follows:
1st escape or attempted escape during 12-month period - 4 weeks confinement
2nd escape or attempted escape during 12-month period - 8 weeks confinement
3rd and subsequent escape or attempted escape during 12-month period - 12 weeks confinement
2If the court finds that a respondent has violated terms of an order, it may impose a penalty of up to 30 days of confinement.
JUVENILE SENTENCING STANDARDS
This schedule must be used for juvenile offenders.
The court may select sentencing option A, B, ((or)) C, or D.
OPTION A
JUVENILE OFFENDER SENTENCING GRID
STANDARD RANGE
A+ 180 WEEKS TO AGE 21 YEARS
A 103 WEEKS TO 129 WEEKS
A- 15-36 |52-65 |80-100 |103-129
WEEKS |WEEKS |WEEKS|WEEKS
EXCEPT | | |
30-40 | | |
WEEKS FOR | | |
15-17 | | |
YEAR OLDS | | |
Current B+ 15-36 |52-65 |80-100 |103-129
Offense WEEKS |WEEKS |WEEKS |WEEKS
Category
B LOCAL | |52-65
SANCTIONS (LS) |15-36 WEEKS |WEEKS
C+ LS |
|15-36 WEEKS
C LS |15-36 WEEKS
Local Sanctions: |
0 to 30 Days
D+ LS 0 to 12 Months Community Supervision
0 to 150 Hours Community Service
D LS $0 to $500 Fine
E LS
0 1 2 3 4 or more
PRIOR ADJUDICATIONS
NOTE: References in the grid to days or weeks mean periods of confinement.
(1) The vertical axis of the grid is the current offense category. The current offense category is determined by the offense of adjudication.
(2) The horizontal axis of the grid is the number of prior adjudications included in the juvenile's criminal history. Each prior felony adjudication shall count as one point. Each prior violation, misdemeanor, and gross misdemeanor adjudication shall count as 1/4 point. Fractional points shall be rounded down.
(3) The standard range disposition for each offense is determined by the intersection of the column defined by the prior adjudications and the row defined by the current offense category.
(4) RCW 13.40.180 applies if the offender is being sentenced for more than one offense.
(5) A current offense that is a violation is equivalent to an offense category of E. However, a disposition for a violation shall not include confinement.
OR
OPTION B
CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY DISPOSITION ALTERNATIVE
If
the juvenile offender is subject to a standard range disposition of local
sanctions or 15 to 36 weeks of confinement and has not committed an A- or B+
offense, the court may impose a disposition under RCW 13.40.160(((5))) (4)
and 13.40.165.
OR
OPTION C
MANIFEST INJUSTICE
If the court determines that a disposition under option A or B would effectuate a manifest injustice, the court shall impose a disposition outside the standard range under RCW 13.40.160(2).
OR
OPTION D
COMMUNITY SANCTION DISPOSITION ALTERNATIVE
If the juvenile offender has not been previously committed to a state institution, but is presently subject to a standard range disposition of confinement in a state institution and has not committed a sex offense, a serious violent offense as defined in RCW 9.94A.030, or other violent category A felony as defined in this section, the court may impose a disposition under RCW 13.40.160(5) and section 4 of this act.
Sec. 2. RCW 13.40.077 and 1997 c 338 s 18 are each amended to read as follows:
RECOMMENDED PROSECUTING STANDARDS
FOR CHARGING AND PLEA DISPOSITIONS
INTRODUCTION: These standards are intended solely for the guidance of prosecutors in the state of Washington. They are not intended to, do not, and may not be relied upon to create a right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party in litigation with the state.
Evidentiary sufficiency.
(1) Decision not to prosecute.
STANDARD: A prosecuting attorney may decline to prosecute, even though technically sufficient evidence to prosecute exists, in situations where prosecution would serve no public purpose, would defeat the underlying purpose of the law in question, or would result in decreased respect for the law. The decision not to prosecute or divert shall not be influenced by the race, gender, religion, or creed of the suspect.
GUIDELINES/COMMENTARY:
Examples
The following are examples of reasons not to prosecute which could satisfy the standard.
(a) Contrary to Legislative Intent - It may be proper to decline to charge where the application of criminal sanctions would be clearly contrary to the intent of the legislature in enacting the particular statute.
(b) Antiquated Statute - It may be proper to decline to charge where the statute in question is antiquated in that:
(i) It has not been enforced for many years;
(ii) Most members of society act as if it were no longer in existence;
(iii) It serves no deterrent or protective purpose in today's society; and
(iv) The statute has not been recently reconsidered by the legislature.
This reason is not to be construed as the basis for declining cases because the law in question is unpopular or because it is difficult to enforce.
(c) De Minimis Violation - It may be proper to decline to charge where the violation of law is only technical or insubstantial and where no public interest or deterrent purpose would be served by prosecution.
(d) Confinement on Other Charges - It may be proper to decline to charge because the accused has been sentenced on another charge to a lengthy period of confinement; and
(i) Conviction of the new offense would not merit any additional direct or collateral punishment;
(ii) The new offense is either a misdemeanor or a felony which is not particularly aggravated; and
(iii) Conviction of the new offense would not serve any significant deterrent purpose.
(e) Pending Conviction on Another Charge - It may be proper to decline to charge because the accused is facing a pending prosecution in the same or another county; and
(i) Conviction of the new offense would not merit any additional direct or collateral punishment;
(ii) Conviction in the pending prosecution is imminent;
(iii) The new offense is either a misdemeanor or a felony which is not particularly aggravated; and
(iv) Conviction of the new offense would not serve any significant deterrent purpose.
(f) High Disproportionate Cost of Prosecution - It may be proper to decline to charge where the cost of locating or transporting, or the burden on, prosecution witnesses is highly disproportionate to the importance of prosecuting the offense in question. The reason should be limited to minor cases and should not be relied upon in serious cases.
(g) Improper Motives of Complainant - It may be proper to decline charges because the motives of the complainant are improper and prosecution would serve no public purpose, would defeat the underlying purpose of the law in question, or would result in decreased respect for the law.
(h) Immunity - It may be proper to decline to charge where immunity is to be given to an accused in order to prosecute another where the accused information or testimony will reasonably lead to the conviction of others who are responsible for more serious criminal conduct or who represent a greater danger to the public interest.
(i) Victim Request - It may be proper to decline to charge because the victim requests that no criminal charges be filed and the case involves the following crimes or situations:
(i) Assault cases where the victim has suffered little or no injury;
(ii) Crimes against property, not involving violence, where no major loss was suffered;
(iii) Where doing so would not jeopardize the safety of society.
Care should be taken to insure that the victim's request is freely made and is not the product of threats or pressure by the accused.
The presence of these factors may also justify the decision to dismiss a prosecution which has been commenced.
Notification
The prosecutor is encouraged to notify the victim, when practical, and the law enforcement personnel, of the decision not to prosecute.
(2) Decision to prosecute.
STANDARD:
Crimes
against persons will be filed if sufficient admissible evidence exists, which,
when considered with the most plausible, reasonably foreseeable defense that
could be raised under the evidence, would justify conviction by a reasonable
and objective fact-finder. With regard to offenses prohibited by RCW
9A.44.040, 9A.44.050, 9A.44.073, 9A.44.076, 9A.44.079, 9A.44.083, 9A.44.086,
9A.44.089, and 9A.64.020 the prosecutor should avoid prefiling agreements or
diversions intended to place the accused in a program of treatment or
counseling, so that treatment, if determined to be beneficial, can be proved
under RCW 13.40.160(((4))) (3).
Crimes against property/other crimes will be filed if the admissible evidence is of such convincing force as to make it probable that a reasonable and objective fact-finder would convict after hearing all the admissible evidence and the most plausible defense that could be raised.
The categorization of crimes for these charging standards shall be the same as found in RCW 9.94A.440(2).
The decision to prosecute or use diversion shall not be influenced by the race, gender, religion, or creed of the respondent.
(3) Selection of Charges/Degree of Charge
(a) The prosecutor should file charges which adequately describe the nature of the respondent's conduct. Other offenses may be charged only if they are necessary to ensure that the charges:
(i) Will significantly enhance the strength of the state's case at trial; or
(ii) Will result in restitution to all victims.
(b) The prosecutor should not overcharge to obtain a guilty plea. Overcharging includes:
(i) Charging a higher degree;
(ii) Charging additional counts.
This standard is intended to direct prosecutors to charge those crimes which demonstrate the nature and seriousness of a respondent's criminal conduct, but to decline to charge crimes which are not necessary to such an indication. Crimes which do not merge as a matter of law, but which arise from the same course of conduct, do not all have to be charged.
(4) Police Investigation
A prosecuting attorney is dependent upon law enforcement agencies to conduct the necessary factual investigation which must precede the decision to prosecute. The prosecuting attorney shall ensure that a thorough factual investigation has been conducted before a decision to prosecute is made. In ordinary circumstances the investigation should include the following:
(a) The interviewing of all material witnesses, together with the obtaining of written statements whenever possible;
(b) The completion of necessary laboratory tests; and
(c) The obtaining, in accordance with constitutional requirements, of the suspect's version of the events.
If the initial investigation is incomplete, a prosecuting attorney should insist upon further investigation before a decision to prosecute is made, and specify what the investigation needs to include.
(5) Exceptions
In certain situations, a prosecuting attorney may authorize filing of a criminal complaint before the investigation is complete if:
(a) Probable cause exists to believe the suspect is guilty; and
(b) The suspect presents a danger to the community or is likely to flee if not apprehended; or
(c) The arrest of the suspect is necessary to complete the investigation of the crime.
In the event that the exception to the standard is applied, the prosecuting attorney shall obtain a commitment from the law enforcement agency involved to complete the investigation in a timely manner. If the subsequent investigation does not produce sufficient evidence to meet the normal charging standard, the complaint should be dismissed.
(6) Investigation Techniques
The prosecutor should be fully advised of the investigatory techniques that were used in the case investigation including:
(a) Polygraph testing;
(b) Hypnosis;
(c) Electronic surveillance;
(d) Use of informants.
(7) Prefiling Discussions with Defendant
Discussions with the defendant or his or her representative regarding the selection or disposition of charges may occur prior to the filing of charges, and potential agreements can be reached.
(8) Plea dispositions:
STANDARD
(a) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, a respondent will normally be expected to plead guilty to the charge or charges which adequately describe the nature of his or her criminal conduct or go to trial.
(b) In certain circumstances, a plea agreement with a respondent in exchange for a plea of guilty to a charge or charges that may not fully describe the nature of his or her criminal conduct may be necessary and in the public interest. Such situations may include the following:
(i) Evidentiary problems which make conviction of the original charges doubtful;
(ii) The respondent's willingness to cooperate in the investigation or prosecution of others whose criminal conduct is more serious or represents a greater public threat;
(iii) A request by the victim when it is not the result of pressure from the respondent;
(iv) The discovery of facts which mitigate the seriousness of the respondent's conduct;
(v) The correction of errors in the initial charging decision;
(vi) The respondent's history with respect to criminal activity;
(vii) The nature and seriousness of the offense or offenses charged;
(viii) The probable effect of witnesses.
(c) No plea agreement shall be influenced by the race, gender, religion, or creed of the respondent. This includes but is not limited to the prosecutor's decision to utilize such disposition alternatives as the Special Sex Offender Disposition Alternative, the Chemical Dependency Disposition Alternative, and manifest injustice.
(9) Disposition recommendations:
STANDARD
The prosecutor may reach an agreement regarding disposition recommendations.
The prosecutor shall not agree to withhold relevant information from the court concerning the plea agreement.
Sec. 3. RCW 13.40.160 and 1997 c 338 s 25 and 1997 c 265 s 1 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:
(1) The standard range disposition for a juvenile adjudicated of an offense is determined according to RCW 13.40.0357.
(a)
When the court sentences an offender to a local sanction as provided in RCW
13.40.0357 option A, the court shall impose a determinate disposition within
the standard ranges, except as provided in subsections (2), (((4))) (3),
and (5) of this section. The disposition may be comprised of one or more local
sanctions.
(b)
When the court sentences an offender to a standard range as provided in RCW
13.40.0357 option A that includes a term of confinement exceeding thirty days,
commitment shall be to the department for the standard range of confinement,
except as provided in subsections (2), (((4))) (3), and (5) of
this section.
(2) If the court concludes, and enters reasons for its conclusion, that disposition within the standard range would effectuate a manifest injustice the court shall impose a disposition outside the standard range, as indicated in option C of RCW 13.40.0357. The court's finding of manifest injustice shall be supported by clear and convincing evidence.
A disposition outside the standard range shall be determinate and shall be comprised of confinement or community supervision, or a combination thereof. When a judge finds a manifest injustice and imposes a sentence of confinement exceeding thirty days, the court shall sentence the juvenile to a maximum term, and the provisions of RCW 13.40.030(2) shall be used to determine the range. A disposition outside the standard range is appealable under RCW 13.40.230 by the state or the respondent. A disposition within the standard range is not appealable under RCW 13.40.230.
(3)
((Where a respondent is found to have committed an offense for which the
respondent declined to enter into a diversion agreement, the court shall impose
a term of community supervision limited to the conditions allowed in a
diversion agreement as provided in RCW 13.40.080(2).
(4))) When
a juvenile offender is found to have committed a sex offense, other than a sex
offense that is also a serious violent offense as defined by RCW 9.94A.030, and
has no history of a prior sex offense, the court, on its own motion or the
motion of the state or the respondent, may order an examination to determine
whether the respondent is amenable to treatment.
The report of the examination shall include at a minimum the following: The respondent's version of the facts and the official version of the facts, the respondent's offense history, an assessment of problems in addition to alleged deviant behaviors, the respondent's social, educational, and employment situation, and other evaluation measures used. The report shall set forth the sources of the evaluator's information.
The examiner shall assess and report regarding the respondent's amenability to treatment and relative risk to the community. A proposed treatment plan shall be provided and shall include, at a minimum:
(a)(i) Frequency and type of contact between the offender and therapist;
(ii) Specific issues to be addressed in the treatment and description of planned treatment modalities;
(iii) Monitoring plans, including any requirements regarding living conditions, lifestyle requirements, and monitoring by family members, legal guardians, or others;
(iv) Anticipated length of treatment; and
(v) Recommended crime-related prohibitions.
The court on its own motion may order, or on a motion by the state shall order, a second examination regarding the offender's amenability to treatment. The evaluator shall be selected by the party making the motion. The defendant shall pay the cost of any second examination ordered unless the court finds the defendant to be indigent in which case the state shall pay the cost.
After receipt of reports of the examination, the court shall then consider whether the offender and the community will benefit from use of this special sex offender disposition alternative and consider the victim's opinion whether the offender should receive a treatment disposition under this section. If the court determines that this special sex offender disposition alternative is appropriate, then the court shall impose a determinate disposition within the standard range for the offense, or if the court concludes, and enters reasons for its conclusions, that such disposition would cause a manifest injustice, the court shall impose a disposition under option C, and the court may suspend the execution of the disposition and place the offender on community supervision for at least two years. As a condition of the suspended disposition, the court may impose the conditions of community supervision and other conditions, including up to thirty days of confinement and requirements that the offender do any one or more of the following:
(b)(i) Devote time to a specific education, employment, or occupation;
(ii) Undergo available outpatient sex offender treatment for up to two years, or inpatient sex offender treatment not to exceed the standard range of confinement for that offense. A community mental health center may not be used for such treatment unless it has an appropriate program designed for sex offender treatment. The respondent shall not change sex offender treatment providers or treatment conditions without first notifying the prosecutor, the probation counselor, and the court, and shall not change providers without court approval after a hearing if the prosecutor or probation counselor object to the change;
(iii) Remain within prescribed geographical boundaries and notify the court or the probation counselor prior to any change in the offender's address, educational program, or employment;
(iv) Report to the prosecutor and the probation counselor prior to any change in a sex offender treatment provider. This change shall have prior approval by the court;
(v) Report as directed to the court and a probation counselor;
(vi) Pay all court-ordered legal financial obligations, perform community service, or any combination thereof;
(vii) Make restitution to the victim for the cost of any counseling reasonably related to the offense;
(viii) Comply with the conditions of any court-ordered probation bond; or
(ix) The court shall order that the offender may not attend the public or approved private elementary, middle, or high school attended by the victim or the victim's siblings. The parents or legal guardians of the offender are responsible for transportation or other costs associated with the offender's change of school that would otherwise be paid by the school district. The court shall send notice of the disposition and restriction on attending the same school as the victim or victim's siblings to the public or approved private school the juvenile will attend, if known, or if unknown, to the approved private schools and the public school district board of directors of the district in which the juvenile resides or intends to reside. This notice must be sent at the earliest possible date but not later than ten calendar days after entry of the disposition.
The sex offender treatment provider shall submit quarterly reports on the respondent's progress in treatment to the court and the parties. The reports shall reference the treatment plan and include at a minimum the following: Dates of attendance, respondent's compliance with requirements, treatment activities, the respondent's relative progress in treatment, and any other material specified by the court at the time of the disposition.
At the time of the disposition, the court may set treatment review hearings as the court considers appropriate.
Except
as provided in this subsection (((4))) (3), after July 1, 1991,
examinations and treatment ordered pursuant to this subsection shall only be
conducted by sex offender treatment providers certified by the department of
health pursuant to chapter 18.155 RCW. A sex offender therapist who examines
or treats a juvenile sex offender pursuant to this subsection does not have to
be certified by the department of health pursuant to chapter 18.155 RCW if the
court finds that: (A) The offender has already moved to another state or plans
to move to another state for reasons other than circumventing the certification
requirements; (B) no certified providers are available for treatment within a
reasonable geographical distance of the offender's home; and (C) the evaluation
and treatment plan comply with this subsection (((4))) (3) and
the rules adopted by the department of health.
If the offender violates any condition of the disposition or the court finds that the respondent is failing to make satisfactory progress in treatment, the court may revoke the suspension and order execution of the disposition or the court may impose a penalty of up to thirty days' confinement for violating conditions of the disposition. The court may order both execution of the disposition and up to thirty days' confinement for the violation of the conditions of the disposition. The court shall give credit for any confinement time previously served if that confinement was for the offense for which the suspension is being revoked.
For purposes of this section, "victim" means any person who has sustained emotional, psychological, physical, or financial injury to person or property as a direct result of the crime charged. "Victim" may also include a known parent or guardian of a victim who is a minor child unless the parent or guardian is the perpetrator of the offense.
A
disposition entered under this subsection (((4))) (3) is not
appealable under RCW 13.40.230.
(((5)))
(4) If the juvenile offender is subject to a standard range disposition
of local sanctions or 15 to 36 weeks of confinement and has not committed an A-
or B+ offense, the court may impose the disposition alternative under RCW
13.40.165.
(5) If the juvenile offender has not been previously committed to a state institution, but is presently subject to a standard range disposition of confinement to a state institution and has not committed a sex offense, a serious violent offense as defined in RCW 9.94A.030, or other violent category A felony as defined in RCW 13.40.0357, the court may impose a community sanction disposition alternative under section 4 of this act.
(6) RCW 13.40.193 shall govern the disposition of any juvenile adjudicated of possessing a firearm in violation of RCW 9.41.040(1)(b)(iii) or any crime in which a special finding is entered that the juvenile was armed with a firearm.
(7) Whenever a juvenile offender is entitled to credit for time spent in detention prior to a dispositional order, the dispositional order shall specifically state the number of days of credit for time served.
(8) Except as provided under subsection (3), (4), or (5) of this section or RCW 13.40.127, the court shall not suspend or defer the imposition or the execution of the disposition.
(9) In no case shall the term of confinement imposed by the court at disposition exceed that to which an adult could be subjected for the same offense.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. A new section is added to chapter 13.40 RCW to read as follows:
(1) When a juvenile offender is subject to a standard range disposition of confinement to a state institution and has not been previously committed to a state institution, the court, on its own motion or on the motion of the state or the respondent may order a community sanction disposition alternative in lieu of confinement in a state institution if the offender has not committed a sex offense, a serious violent offense as defined in RCW 9.94A.030, or other violent category A felony as defined in RCW 13.40.0357.
(2) In determining whether to order a community sanction disposition, the court shall assess the risk to the public safety and the probability of the offender's rehabilitation in the community. If a victim wishes to voice his or her opinion regarding the appropriateness of a community sanction disposition, the court shall hear and give great weight to the testimony of any victim who expresses the opinion. The court may not impose the community sanction disposition alternative unless a finding of mitigating circumstances under RCW 13.40.150 is entered. If the court determines that a community sanction disposition alternative is appropriate, the court shall impose the standard range for the offense, suspend execution of the disposition, and place the offender on community supervision for a term not to exceed twelve months.
(3) As a condition of the suspended disposition, the court shall impose conditions of community sanctions including 0 to 30 days of confinement, up to one hundred fifty hours of community service, and the payment of legal financial obligations and restitution. The court may also require the offender to participate in rehabilitation programming in the community including school, employment, vocational programs, or outpatient mental health or substance abuse treatment. Required rehabilitative programs should be research-based and use the best practices available.
(4) At the time of the disposition, the court may set review hearings as the court deems appropriate.
(5) If the offender violates any conditions of the community sanction disposition, the court may impose sanctions under RCW 13.40.200, or may revoke the suspended disposition and order execution of the standard range disposition.
(6) If the court revokes the suspended sentence, the court shall give credit for any confinement time previously served. Whenever a juvenile offender is entitled to credit for time spent in detention, the dispositional order shall specifically state the number of days of credit for time served.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. A new section is added to chapter 13.40 RCW to read as follows:
The juvenile rehabilitation administration, in consultation with the Washington association of juvenile courts administrators, shall develop a methodology for distributing to the counties for the purpose of providing financial assistance in meeting the processes and services required by chapter 13.32A RCW, and RCW 28A.225.030 and 28A.225.035 from the savings realized by the use of the community sanction disposition alternative authorized under RCW 13.40.160(5) and section 4 of this act based on each county's use of that alternative.
--- END ---