S-4303.2  _______________________________________________

 

                    SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6724

          _______________________________________________

 

State of Washington      56th Legislature     2000 Regular Session

 

By Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Hale, Loveland, Rossi, West, Snyder and Rasmussen)

 

Read first time 02/04/2000.

Exempting property used for privatization contracts for the treatment of hazardous substances from property taxes.


    AN ACT Relating to exempting property used for privatization contracts for the treatment of radioactive waste and hazardous substances from property taxes; and adding a new section to chapter 84.36 RCW.

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

 

    NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  A new section is added to chapter 84.36 RCW to read as follows:

    (1) Beginning with taxes levied for collection in calendar year 2006, all personal property located on land owned by the United States, or an instrumentality of the United States, at the Hanford reservation that is used exclusively in the performance of a contract to pretreat, treat, vitrify, and immobilize tank waste under subsection (2) of this section is exempt from taxation.

    (2) To qualify for this exemption, the personal property must be owned by a person that has a privatization contract to pretreat, treat, vitrify, and immobilize tank waste located at the Hanford reservation.  A privatization contract, for purposes of this section, means a contract in which the United States, or an instrumentality of the United States, has designated the other contracting party as a party responsible for carrying out tank waste clean-up operations at the Hanford reservation.

    (3) An inadvertent use of property, which otherwise qualifies for an exemption under this section, in a manner inconsistent with the purpose for which the exemption is granted does not nullify the exemption if the inadvertent use is not part of a pattern of use.  A pattern of use is presumed when an inadvertent use is repeated in the same assessment year or in two or more successive assessment years.

 


                            --- END ---