CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT
HOUSE BILL 1070
Chapter 209, Laws of 2000
56th Legislature
2000 Regular Session
SCHOOL DISTRICT PROJECT REVIEW BOARD
EFFECTIVE DATE: 6/8/00
Passed by the House March 5, 2000 Yeas 80 Nays 1
CLYDE BALLARD Speaker of the House of Representatives
FRANK CHOPP Speaker of the House of Representatives
Passed by the Senate February 29, 2000 Yeas 39 Nays 5 |
CERTIFICATE
We, Timothy A. Martin and Cynthia Zehnder, Co-Chief Clerks of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is HOUSE BILL 1070 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.
TIMOTHY A. MARTIN Chief Clerk
CYNTHIA ZEHNDER Chief Clerk |
BRAD OWEN President of the Senate |
|
Approved March 30, 2000 |
FILED
March 30, 2000 - 2:12 p.m. |
|
|
GARY LOCKE Governor of the State of Washington |
Secretary of State State of Washington |
_______________________________________________
HOUSE BILL 1070
_______________________________________________
Passed Legislature - 2000 Regular Session
AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE
State of Washington 56th Legislature 1999 Regular Session
By Representatives Romero and D. Schmidt; by request of Alternative Public Works Methods Oversight Committee
Read first time 01/14/1999. Referred to Committee on State Government.
AN ACT Relating to the general contractor/construction manager procedure for school districts; amending RCW 39.10.020 and 39.10.060; and adding new sections to chapter 39.10 RCW.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1. RCW 39.10.020 and 1997 c 376 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.
(1) "Alternative public works contracting procedure" means the design-build and the general contractor/construction manager contracting procedures authorized in RCW 39.10.050 and 39.10.060, respectively.
(2)
"Public body" means the state department of general administration;
the University of Washington; Washington State University; every city with a
population greater than one hundred fifty thousand; every city authorized to
use the design-build procedure for a water system demonstration project under
RCW 39.10.065(3); every county with a population greater than four hundred
fifty thousand; ((and)) every port district with a population greater
than five hundred thousand; and those school districts proposing projects
that are considered and approved by the school district project review board
under section 4 of this act.
(3) "Public works project" means any work for a public body within the definition of the term public work in RCW 39.04.010.
Sec. 2. RCW 39.10.060 and 1997 c 376 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and after complying with RCW
39.10.030, the following public bodies may utilize the general
contractor/construction manager procedure of public works contracting for
public works projects authorized under subsection (2) of this section: The
state department of general administration; the University of Washington;
Washington State University; every city with a population greater than one
hundred fifty thousand; every county with a population greater than four
hundred fifty thousand; ((and)) every port district with a population
greater than five hundred thousand; and those school districts proposing
projects that are considered and approved by the school district project review
board under section 4 of this act. For the purposes of this section,
"general contractor/construction manager" means a firm with which a
public body has selected and negotiated a maximum allowable construction cost
to be guaranteed by the firm, after competitive selection through formal
advertisement and competitive bids, to provide services during the design phase
that may include life-cycle cost design considerations, value engineering,
scheduling, cost estimating, constructability, alternative construction options
for cost savings, and sequencing of work, and to act as the construction
manager and general contractor during the construction phase.
(2) Except those school districts proposing projects that are considered and approved by the school district project review board public bodies authorized under this section may utilize the general contractor/construction manager procedure for public works projects valued over ten million dollars where:
(a) Implementation of the project involves complex scheduling requirements;
(b) The project involves construction at an existing facility which must continue to operate during construction; or
(c) The involvement of the general contractor/construction manager during the design stage is critical to the success of the project.
(3) Public bodies should select general contractor/construction managers early in the life of public works projects, and in most situations no later than the completion of schematic design.
(4) Contracts for the services of a general contractor/construction manager under this section shall be awarded through a competitive process requiring the public solicitation of proposals for general contractor/construction manager services. The public solicitation of proposals shall include: A description of the project, including programmatic, performance, and technical requirements and specifications when available; the reasons for using the general contractor/construction manager procedure; a description of the qualifications to be required of the proposer, including submission of the proposer's accident prevention program; a description of the process the public body will use to evaluate qualifications and proposals, including evaluation factors and the relative weight of factors; the form of the contract to be awarded; the estimated maximum allowable construction cost; minority and women business enterprise total project goals, where applicable; and the bid instructions to be used by the general contractor/construction manager finalists. Evaluation factors shall include, but not be limited to: Ability of professional personnel, past performance in negotiated and complex projects, and ability to meet time and budget requirements; location; recent, current, and projected work loads of the firm; and the concept of their proposal. A public body shall establish a committee to evaluate the proposals. After the committee has selected the most qualified finalists, these finalists shall submit final proposals, including sealed bids for the percent fee, which is the percentage amount to be earned by the general contractor/construction manager as overhead and profit, on the estimated maximum allowable construction cost and the fixed amount for the detailed specified general conditions work. The public body shall select the firm submitting the highest scored final proposal using the evaluation factors and the relative weight of factors published in the public solicitation of proposals.
(5) The maximum allowable construction cost may be negotiated between the public body and the selected firm after the scope of the project is adequately determined to establish a guaranteed contract cost for which the general contractor/construction manager will provide a performance and payment bond. The guaranteed contract cost includes the fixed amount for the detailed specified general conditions work, the negotiated maximum allowable construction cost, the percent fee on the negotiated maximum allowable construction cost, and sales tax. If the public body is unable to negotiate a satisfactory maximum allowable construction cost with the firm selected that the public body determines to be fair, reasonable, and within the available funds, negotiations with that firm shall be formally terminated and the public body shall negotiate with the next highest scored firm and continue until an agreement is reached or the process is terminated. If the maximum allowable construction cost varies more than fifteen percent from the bid estimated maximum allowable construction cost due to requested and approved changes in the scope by the public body, the percent fee shall be renegotiated.
(6) All subcontract work shall be competitively bid with public bid openings. Subcontract work shall not be issued for bid until the public body has approved, in consultation with the office of minority and women's business enterprises or the equivalent local agency, a plan prepared by the general contractor/construction manager for attaining applicable minority and women business enterprise total project goals that equitably spreads women and minority enterprise opportunities to as many firms in as many bid packages as is practicable. When critical to the successful completion of a subcontractor bid package the owner and general contractor/construction manager may evaluate for bidding eligibility a subcontractor's ability, time, budget, and specification requirements based on the subcontractor's performance of those items on previous projects. Subcontract bid packages shall be awarded to the responsible bidder submitting the low responsive bid. The requirements of RCW 39.30.060 apply to each subcontract bid package. All subcontractors who bid work over three hundred thousand dollars shall post a bid bond and all subcontractors who are awarded a contract over three hundred thousand dollars shall provide a performance and payment bond for their contract amount. All other subcontractors shall provide a performance and payment bond if required by the general contractor/construction manager. A low bidder who claims error and fails to enter into a contract is prohibited from bidding on the same project if a second or subsequent call for bids is made for the project. Except as provided for under subsection (7) of this section, bidding on subcontract work by the general contractor/construction manager or its subsidiaries is prohibited. The general contractor/construction manager may negotiate with the low-responsive bidder in accordance with RCW 39.10.080 or, if unsuccessful in such negotiations, rebid.
(7) The general contractor/construction manager, or its subsidiaries, may bid on subcontract work on projects valued over twenty million dollars if:
(a) The work within the subcontract bid package is customarily performed by the general contractor/construction manager;
(b) The bid opening is managed by the public body; and
(c) Notification of the general contractor/construction manager's intention to bid is included in the public solicitation of bids for the bid package.
In no event may the value of subcontract work performed by the general contractor/construction manager exceed twenty percent of the negotiated maximum allowable construction cost.
(8) A public body may include an incentive clause in any contract awarded under this section for savings of either time or cost or both from that originally negotiated. No incentives granted may exceed five percent of the maximum allowable construction cost. If the project is completed for less than the agreed upon maximum allowable construction cost, any savings not otherwise negotiated as part of an incentive clause shall accrue to the public body. If the project is completed for more than the agreed upon maximum allowable construction cost, excepting increases due to any contract change orders approved by the public body, the additional cost shall be the responsibility of the general contractor/construction manager.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 39.10 RCW to read as follows:
In addition to the projects authorized in RCW 39.10.060, public bodies may also use the general contractor/construction manager contracting procedure for the construction of school district capital demonstration projects, subject to the following conditions:
(1) The project must receive approval from the school district project review board established under section 4 of this act.
(2) The school district project review board may not authorize more than two demonstration projects valued over ten million dollars and two demonstration projects valued between five and ten million dollars.
(3) The school district project review board may not approve more than one demonstration project under this section for each school district.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. A new section is added to chapter 39.10 RCW to read as follows:
(1) The school district project review board is established to review school district proposals submitted by school districts to use alternative public works contracting procedures. The board shall select and approve qualified projects based upon an evaluation of the information submitted by the school district under subsection (2) of this section. The membership of the board shall be selected by the independent oversight committee as established under RCW 39.10.110 and shall include the following representatives, each having experience with public works or commercial construction: One representative from the office of the superintendent of public instruction; one representative from the office of financial management; two representatives from the construction industry, one of whom works for a construction company with gross annual revenues of twenty million dollars or less; one representative from the specialty contracting industry; one representative from organized labor; one representative from the design industry; one representative from a public body previously authorized under this chapter to use an alternative public works contracting procedure who has experience using such alternative contracting procedures; one representative from school districts with ten thousand or more annual average full-time equivalent pupils; and one representative from school districts with fewer than ten thousand average full-time equivalent pupils. Each member shall be appointed for a term of three years, with the first three-year term commencing after the effective date of this section. Any member of the school district project review board who is directly affiliated with any applicant before the board must recuse him or herself from consideration of the application.
(2) A school district seeking to use alternative contracting procedures authorized under this chapter shall file an application with the school district project review board. The application form shall require the district to submit a detailed statement of the proposed project, including the school district's name; student population based upon October full-time equivalents; the current projected total budget for the project, including the estimated construction costs, costs for professional services, equipment and furnishing costs, off-site costs, contract administration costs, and other related project costs; the anticipated project design and construction schedule; a summary of the school district's construction activity for the preceding six years; and an explanation of why the school district believes the use of an alternative contracting procedure is in the public interest and why the school district is qualified to use an alternative contracting procedure, including a summary of the relevant experience of the school district's management team. The applicant shall also provide in a timely manner any other information concerning implementation of projects under this chapter requested by the school district project review board to assist in its consideration.
(3) Any school district whose application is approved by the school district project review board shall comply with the public notification and review requirements in RCW 39.10.030.
(4) Any school district whose application is approved by the school district project review board shall not use as an evaluation factor whether a contractor submitting a bid for the approved project has had prior general contractor/construction manager procedure experience.
(5) The school district project review board shall prepare and issue a report reviewing the use of the alternative public works contracting procedures by school districts. The board shall report to the independent oversight committee at least sixty days before the oversight committee is required to report to the legislature under RCW 39.10.110(4).
Passed the House March 5, 2000.
Passed the Senate February 29, 2000.
Approved by the Governor March 30, 2000.
Filed in Office of Secretary of State March 30, 2000.