6609 AMH .... H4772.1
SB 6609 - H AMD Adopted 0380 3-5-02
By Representative
Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:
"Sec. 1. RCW 43.21A.130 and 1987 c 505 s 28 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) In addition
to any other powers granted the director, the director may undertake studies
dealing with all aspects of environmental problems involving land, water, or
air((: PROVIDED, That)); however, in the absence of specific
legislative authority, such studies shall be limited to investigations of
particular problems, and shall not be implemented by positive action.
(2)(a) Any studies conducted by the department to establish the total maximum daily load of a water body under chapter 90.48 RCW must involve meaningful participation and opportunities to comment by the local watershed planning group established in chapter 90.82 RCW, the local governments whose jurisdictions are within the affected watershed, and any affected or concerned citizen who notifies the department of his or her interest in participating. Technical or procedural disputes or disagreements that arise during the participation and comment process may be presented to the director for review. The director shall conduct a review of the disputed items and issue written findings and conclusions to all interested participants.
(b) If a study conducted on the total maximum daily load of a water body may affect a new or renewed national pollution discharge elimination permit under chapter 90.48 RCW, the department must disclose prior to the finalization of the study the precision and accuracy of data collected, computer models developed, and assumptions used.
(c) Any party that participated in a study under this subsection (2) and disagrees with the director's written findings under (a) of this subsection may request an administrative hearing presided over by an administrative law judge. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with chapter 34.05 RCW. If the administrative law judge finds that the department's conclusions were based on erroneous information or data, the administrative law judge may order that the study be disregarded. The administrative law judge may also order the department to reimburse the party or parties requesting the hearing for any costs associated with hiring professional outside assistance that was reasonably necessary to prove that party's position at the hearing. These costs include attorney and consultant fees. The administrative law judge's determination or order shall be final and not subject to further appeal."
Correct the title.
EFFECT: Requires the Department of Ecology to involve local watershed planning groups, local governments, and affected and concerned citizens when conducting a total maximum daily load study for a water body, and disclose pertinent study information. Any technical or procedural disagreements that arise during the process may be submitted to the director of the Department of Ecology for review. Disagreement with the director's review may be heard by an administrative law judge, who may order that the study be disregarded and award certain costs to the affected party.
--- END ---