SENATE BILL REPORT

SB 5556

 

As Reported By Senate Committee On:

State & Local Government, February 19, 2001

 

Title:  An act relating to the use of public assets for political purposes.

 

Brief Description:  Protecting public assets from political use.

 

Sponsors:  Senators T. Sheldon, Prentice, Roach, Rasmussen, Franklin and McCaslin.

 

Brief History: 

Committee Activity:  State & Local Government:  2/5/01, 2/19/01 [DPS].

SENATE COMMITTEE ON STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT

 

Majority Report:  That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5556 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.

Signed by Senators Patterson, Chair; Fairley, Vice Chair; Gardner, Hale, Haugen, Horn, McCaslin, Roach, T. Sheldon and Swecker.

 

Staff:  Aaron Jennings (786‑7445)

 

Background:  Public funds, supplies, or facilities cannot be used to finance or assist political campaigns for state or local office.

 

Summary of Substitute Bill:  Public funds cannot be used to promote or oppose any ballot proposition.  An  association or nonprofit corporation that derives 25 percent or more of its income from public funds, and a majority of its officers or members are public officials, may not provide any financial support or use its facilities for or against a ballot proposition, to assist a political committee, or to assist a candidate for public office.  An association may, at an open meeting, express a collective position or prepare factual information relating to a specific ballot proposition.

 

Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:  The original bill did not contain the exception allowing an association to meet, so it may express a collective position or prepare factual information relating to a specific ballot proposition.

 

Appropriation:  None.

 

Fiscal Note:  Not requested.

 

Effective Date:  Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

 

Testimony For:  This is a matter of fairness; associations have more money.  Government officials already are not allowed to use public funds to support or oppose a ballot measure; neither should associations of public officials.

 

Testimony Against:  Associations of public officials already are subject to the ban of the use of public funds to support or oppose a ballot measure, there is no need to codify it.  Associations should be allowed to use nonpublic funds to support or oppose a ballot measure.

 

Testified:  PRO:  Paul Telford, Ken Bragg, Citizens for Responsible Government.  CON:  Bill Vogler, Washington State Association of Counties; Fred Saeger, Washington Association of County Officials; Jim Justin, AWC; Pat Jones, Washington Public Ports Association; Stu Trefry, Washington P.U.D. Association.