CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT
SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2699
57th Legislature
2002 Regular Session
Passed by the House March 11, 2002 Yeas 94 Nays 0
Speaker of the House of Representatives
Passed by the Senate March 5, 2002 Yeas 47 Nays 0 |
CERTIFICATE
I, Cynthia Zehnder, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2699 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.
Chief Clerk
|
President of the Senate |
|
Approved |
FILED |
|
|
Governor of the State of Washington |
Secretary of State State of Washington |
_______________________________________________
SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2699
_______________________________________________
AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE
Passed Legislature - 2002 Regular Session
State of Washington 57th Legislature 2002 Regular Session
By House Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Representatives Lantz, Ahern, Benson, Crouse, Morell, Miloscia, Schindler, Dunshee and Esser)
Read first time 02/07/2002. Referred to Committee on .
AN ACT Relating to communications with government branches or agencies and self-regulatory organizations; amending RCW 4.24.510; and creating a new section.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. Strategic lawsuits against public participation, or SLAPP suits, involve communications made to influence a government action or outcome which results in a civil complaint or counterclaim filed against individuals or organizations on a substantive issue of some public interest or social significance. SLAPP suits are designed to intimidate the exercise of First Amendment rights and rights under Article I, section 5 of the Washington state Constitution.
Although Washington state adopted the first modern anti-SLAPP law in 1989, that law has, in practice, failed to set forth clear rules for early dismissal review. Since that time, the United States supreme court has made it clear that, as long as the petitioning is aimed at procuring favorable government action, result, product, or outcome, it is protected and the case should be dismissed. This bill amends Washington law to bring it in line with these court decisions which recognizes that the United States Constitution protects advocacy to government, regardless of content or motive, so long as it is designed to have some effect on government decision making.
Sec. 2. RCW 4.24.510 and 1999 c 54 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
A person
who ((in good faith)) communicates a complaint or information to any branch
or agency of federal, state, or local government, or to any self-regulatory
organization that regulates persons involved in the securities or futures
business and that has been delegated authority by a federal, state, or local
government agency and is subject to oversight by the delegating agency, is
immune from civil liability for claims based upon the communication to the
agency or organization regarding any matter reasonably of concern to that
agency or organization. A person prevailing upon the defense provided for in
this section ((shall be)) is entitled to recover ((costs))
expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in establishing the
defense and in addition shall receive statutory damages of ten thousand
dollars. Statutory damages may be denied if the court finds that the complaint
or information was communicated in bad faith.
--- END ---