S-4123.1 _______________________________________________
SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6594
_______________________________________________
State of Washington 57th Legislature 2002 Regular Session
By Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections (originally sponsored by Senators Carlson, Costa, Hargrove and Long; by request of Jt Select Comm on the Equitable Distrib of Secure Community Transition Facil)
READ FIRST TIME 02/08/2002.
AN ACT Relating to the implementation of the recommendations of the joint select committee on the equitable distribution of secure community transition facilities; amending RCW 36.70A.200, 71.09.020, 71.09.285, 71.09.305, 71.09.255, and 36.70A.103; adding a new section to chapter 4.24 RCW; adding new sections to chapter 71.09 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 34.05 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 43.21C RCW; adding a new section to chapter 90.58 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 77.55 RCW; creating a new section; and declaring an emergency.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The purpose of this act is to enable the legislature to act upon the recommendations of the joint select committee on the equitable distribution of secure community transition facilities established in section 225, chapter 12, Laws of 2001 2nd sp. sess.
Sec. 2. RCW 36.70A.200 and 2001 2nd sp.s. c 12 s 205 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) The comprehensive plan of each county and city that is planning under RCW 36.70A.040 shall include a process for identifying and siting essential public facilities. Essential public facilities include those facilities that are typically difficult to site, such as airports, state education facilities and state or regional transportation facilities as defined in RCW 47.06.140, state and local correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, and in-patient facilities including substance abuse facilities, mental health facilities, group homes, and secure community transition facilities as defined in RCW 71.09.020.
(2) Each county and
city planning under RCW 36.70A.040 shall, not later than ((the deadline
specified in RCW 36.70A.130)) September 1, 2002, establish a
process, or amend its existing process, for identifying and siting essential
public facilities, and adopt or amend its development regulations as necessary
to provide for the siting of secure community transition facilities consistent
with statutory requirements applicable to these facilities.
(3) Any city or county not planning under RCW 36.70A.040 shall, not later than the deadline specified in RCW 36.70A.130, establish a process for siting secure community transition facilities and adopt or amend its development regulations as necessary to provide for the siting of such facilities consistent with statutory requirements applicable to these facilities.
(4) The office of financial management shall maintain a list of those essential state public facilities that are required or likely to be built within the next six years. The office of financial management may at any time add facilities to the list.
(5) No local comprehensive plan or development regulation may preclude the siting of essential public facilities.
(6) No person may bring a cause of action for civil damages based on the good faith actions of any county or city to provide for the siting of secure community transition facilities in accordance with this section and with the requirements of chapter 12, Laws of 2001 2nd sp. sess. For purposes of this subsection, "person" includes, but is not limited to, any individual, agency as defined in RCW 42.17.020, corporation, partnership, association, and limited liability entity.
(7) Counties or cities siting facilities pursuant to subsection (2) or (3) of this section shall comply with section 7 of this act.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A new section is added to chapter 4.24 RCW to read as follows:
(1) Law enforcement shall respond to a call regarding a resident of a secure community transition facility as a high priority call.
(2) No law enforcement officer responding reasonably and in good faith to a call regarding a resident of a secure community transition facility shall be held liable nor shall the city or county employing the officer be held liable, in any cause of action for civil damages based on the acts of the resident or the actions of the officer during the response.
Sec. 4. RCW 71.09.020 and 2001 2nd sp.s. c 12 s 102 are each amended to read as follows:
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.
(1) "Department" means the department of social and health services.
(2) "Less restrictive alternative" means court‑ordered treatment in a setting less restrictive than total confinement which satisfies the conditions set forth in RCW 71.09.092.
(3) "Likely to engage in predatory acts of sexual violence if not confined in a secure facility" means that the person more probably than not will engage in such acts if released unconditionally from detention on the sexually violent predator petition. Such likelihood must be evidenced by a recent overt act if the person is not totally confined at the time the petition is filed under RCW 71.09.030.
(4) "Mental abnormality" means a congenital or acquired condition affecting the emotional or volitional capacity which predisposes the person to the commission of criminal sexual acts in a degree constituting such person a menace to the health and safety of others.
(5) "Predatory" means acts directed towards: (a) Strangers; (b) individuals with whom a relationship has been established or promoted for the primary purpose of victimization; or (c) persons of casual acquaintance with whom no substantial personal relationship exists.
(6) "Recent overt act" means any act or threat that has either caused harm of a sexually violent nature or creates a reasonable apprehension of such harm in the mind of an objective person who knows of the history and mental condition of the person engaging in the act.
(7) "Risk
potential activity" or "risk potential facility" means an
activity or facility that provides a higher incidence of risk to the public
from persons conditionally released from the special commitment center. Risk
potential activities and facilities include: Public and private schools,
school bus stops, licensed day care and licensed preschool facilities, public
parks, publicly dedicated trails, sports fields, playgrounds, recreational and
community centers, churches, synagogues, temples, mosques, ((and))
public libraries, and others identified by the department following the
hearings on a potential site required in RCW 71.09.315. For purposes of this
chapter, "school bus stops" does not include bus stops established
primarily for public transit.
(8) "Secretary" means the secretary of social and health services or the secretary's designee.
(9) "Secure facility" means a residential facility for persons civilly confined under the provisions of this chapter that includes security measures sufficient to protect the community. Such facilities include total confinement facilities, secure community transition facilities, and any residence used as a court-ordered placement under RCW 71.09.096.
(10) "Secure community transition facility" means a residential facility for persons civilly committed and conditionally released to a less restrictive alternative under this chapter. A secure community transition facility has supervision and security, and either provides or ensures the provision of sex offender treatment services. Secure community transition facilities include but are not limited to the facilities established pursuant to RCW 71.09.250 and any community‑based facilities established under this chapter and operated by the secretary or under contract with the secretary.
(11) "Sexually violent offense" means an act committed on, before, or after July 1, 1990, that is: (a) An act defined in Title 9A RCW as rape in the first degree, rape in the second degree by forcible compulsion, rape of a child in the first or second degree, statutory rape in the first or second degree, indecent liberties by forcible compulsion, indecent liberties against a child under age fourteen, incest against a child under age fourteen, or child molestation in the first or second degree; (b) a felony offense in effect at any time prior to July 1, 1990, that is comparable to a sexually violent offense as defined in (a) of this subsection, or any federal or out-of-state conviction for a felony offense that under the laws of this state would be a sexually violent offense as defined in this subsection; (c) an act of murder in the first or second degree, assault in the first or second degree, assault of a child in the first or second degree, kidnapping in the first or second degree, burglary in the first degree, residential burglary, or unlawful imprisonment, which act, either at the time of sentencing for the offense or subsequently during civil commitment proceedings pursuant to this chapter, has been determined beyond a reasonable doubt to have been sexually motivated, as that term is defined in RCW 9.94A.030; or (d) an act as described in chapter 9A.28 RCW, that is an attempt, criminal solicitation, or criminal conspiracy to commit one of the felonies designated in (a), (b), or (c) of this subsection.
(12) "Sexually violent predator" means any person who has been convicted of or charged with a crime of sexual violence and who suffers from a mental abnormality or personality disorder which makes the person likely to engage in predatory acts of sexual violence if not confined in a secure facility.
(13) "Total confinement facility" means a facility that provides supervision and sex offender treatment services in a total confinement setting. Total confinement facilities include the special commitment center and any similar facility designated as a secure facility by the secretary.
Sec. 5. RCW 71.09.285 and 2001 2nd sp.s. c 12 s 213 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Except with respect to the secure community transition facility established pursuant to RCW 71.09.250, the secretary shall develop policy guidelines that balance the average response time of emergency services to the general area of a proposed secure community transition facility against the proximity of the proposed site to risk potential activities and facilities in existence at the time the site is listed for consideration.
(2) In ((balancing
the competing criteria of proximity and response time the policy guidelines
shall endeavor to achieve an average law enforcement response time not greater
than five minutes and in)) no case shall the policy guidelines permit
location of a facility adjacent to, immediately across a street or parking lot
from, or within the line of sight of a risk potential activity or facility in
existence at the time a site is listed for consideration. "Within the
line of sight" means that it is possible to reasonably visually
distinguish and recognize individuals.
(3) The policy guidelines shall require that great weight be given to sites that are the farthest removed from any risk potential activity.
(4) The policy guidelines shall specify how distance from the location is measured and any variations in the measurement based on the size of the property within which a proposed facility is to be located.
(5) The policy guidelines shall establish a method to analyze and compare the criteria for each site in terms of public safety and security, site characteristics, and program components. In making a decision regarding a site following the analysis and comparison, the secretary shall give priority to public safety and security considerations. The analysis and comparison of the criteria are to be documented and made available at the public hearings prescribed in RCW 71.09.315.
(6) Policy guidelines adopted by the secretary under this section shall be considered by counties and cities when providing for the siting of secure community transition facilities as required under RCW 36.70A.200.
Sec. 6. RCW 71.09.305 and 2001 2nd sp.s. c 12 s 217 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court:
(a) Residents of a secure community transition facility shall wear electronic monitoring devices at all times. To the extent that electronic monitoring devices that employ global positioning system technology are available and funds for this purpose are appropriated by the legislature, the department shall use these devices.
(b) At least one staff member, or other court‑authorized and department‑approved person must escort each resident when the resident leaves the secure community transition facility for appointments, employment, or other approved activities. Escorting persons must supervise the resident closely and maintain close proximity to the resident. The escort must immediately notify the department of any serious violation, as defined in RCW 71.09.325, by the resident and must immediately notify law enforcement of any violation of law by the resident. The escort may not be a relative of the resident or a person with whom the resident has, or has had, a dating relationship as defined in RCW 26.50.010.
(2) Staff members of
the special commitment center and any other total confinement facility and any
secure community transition facility must be trained in self-defense and appropriate
crisis responses including incident de-escalation. Prior to escorting a person
outside of a facility, staff members must also have training in the offense
pattern of the offender they are escorting. ((The escort may not be a
relative of the resident.))
(3) Any escort must carry a cellular telephone or a similar device at all times when escorting a resident of a secure community transition facility.
(4) The department shall require training in offender pattern, self-defense, and incident response for all court-authorized escorts who are not employed by the department or the department of corrections.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. A new section is added to chapter 71.09 RCW to read as follows:
The minimum requirements set out in RCW 71.09.285 through 71.09.340 are minimum requirements to be applied by the department. Nothing in this section is intended to prevent a city or county from adopting development regulations, as defined in RCW 36.70A.030, unless the proposed regulation imposes requirements more restrictive than those specifically addressed in RCW 71.09.285 through 71.09.340. Regulations that impose requirements more restrictive than those specifically addressed in these sections are void. Nothing in these sections prevents the department from adding requirements to enhance public safety.
Sec. 8. RCW 71.09.255 and 2001 2nd sp.s. c 12 s 204 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Upon receiving the notification required by RCW 71.09.250, counties must promptly notify the cities within the county of the maximum number of secure community transition facility beds that may be required and the projected number of beds to be needed in that county.
(2) The incentive grants and payments provided under this section are subject to the following provisions:
(a) Counties and the cities within the county must notify each other of siting plans to promote the establishment and equitable distribution of secure community transition facilities;
(b) Development regulations, ordinances, plans, laws, and criteria established for siting must be consistent with statutory requirements and rules applicable to siting and operating secure community transition facilities;
(c) The minimum size for any facility is three beds; and
(d) The department must approve any sites selected.
(3) Any county or city
that makes a commitment to initiate the process to site one or more secure
community transition facilities by ((February 1, 2002)) one hundred
twenty days after the effective date of this act, shall receive a planning
grant as proposed and approved by the department of community, trade, and
economic development.
(4) Any county or city that has issued all necessary permits by May 1, 2003, for one or more secure community transition facilities that comply with the requirements of this section shall receive an incentive grant in the amount of fifty thousand dollars for each bed sited.
(5) To encourage the rapid permitting of sites, any county or city that has issued all necessary permits by January 1, 2003, for one or more secure community transition facilities that comply with the requirements of this section shall receive a bonus in the amount of twenty percent of the amount provided under subsection (4) of this section.
(6) Any county or city that establishes secure community transition facility beds in excess of the maximum number that could be required to be sited in that county shall receive a bonus payment of one hundred thousand dollars for each bed established in excess of the maximum requirement.
(7) No payment shall be made under subsection (4), (5), or (6) of this section until all necessary permits have been issued.
(8) The funds available to counties and cities under this section are contingent upon funds being appropriated by the legislature.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. A new section is added to chapter 71.09 RCW to read as follows:
(1) After October 1, 2002, notwithstanding RCW 36.70A.103 or any other law, this section preempts and supersedes local plans, development regulations, permitting requirements, inspection requirements, and all other laws as necessary to enable the department to site, construct, renovate, occupy, and operate secure community transition facilities within the borders of the following:
(a) Chelan, Clark, Cowlitz, Franklin, Grays Harbor, King, Kitsap, Snohomish, Spokane, Thurston, Whatcom, and Yakima counties, if the department determines that the county has not met the requirements of RCW 36.70A.200 with respect to secure community transition facilities; and
(b) Any city located within a county listed in (a) of this subsection that the department determines has not met the requirements of RCW 36.70A.200 with respect to secure community transition facilities.
(2) When siting a facility in a county or city that has been preempted under this section, the department shall consider the policy guidelines established under RCW 71.09.275 and 71.09.290 and shall hold the hearings required in RCW 71.09.315.
(3) Nothing in this section prohibits the department from:
(a) Siting a secure community transition facility in a city or county that has complied with the requirements of RCW 36.70A.200 with respect to secure community transition facilities, including a city that is located within a county that has been preempted. If the department sites a secure community transition facility in such a city or county, the department shall use the process established by the city or county for siting such facilities; or
(b) Consulting with a city or county that has been preempted under this section regarding the siting of a secure community transition facility.
(4)(a) A preempted city or county may propose public safety conditions specific to any finalist site to the department. The proposal must be made in writing by the date of:
(i) The second hearing under RCW 71.09.315(2)(a) when there are three finalist sites; or
(ii) The first hearing under RCW 71.09.315(2)(b) when there is only one site under consideration.
(b) The department shall respond to the city or county in writing within fifteen business days of receiving the proposed conditions. The response shall address all proposed conditions.
(c) If the city or county finds that the department's response is inadequate, the city or county may notify the department in writing within fifteen business days of the specific items which it finds inadequate. If the city or county does not notify the department of a finding that the response is inadequate within fifteen business days, the department's response shall be final.
(d) If the city or county notifies the department that it finds the response inadequate and the department does not revise its response to the satisfaction of the city or county within seven business days, the city or county may petition the Washington state patrol to review the response under RCW 34.05.479.
(e) The Washington state patrol shall hear a petition filed under this subsection and shall make a determination within thirty days of hearing the petition. The determination by the Washington state patrol shall be final and may not be the basis for any cause of action in civil court.
(f) The city or county shall bear the cost of the petition to the Washington state patrol. If the city or county prevails on all issues, the department shall reimburse the city or county costs incurred, as provided under chapter 34.05 RCW.
(g) The department's consideration and response to public safety conditions proposed by a city or county shall not be construed to affect the preemption under this section.
(5) This section does not apply to the secure community transition facility established pursuant to RCW 71.09.250(1).
NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. A new section is added to chapter 34.05 RCW to read as follows:
A petition brought pursuant to section 9(4) of this act shall be heard under the provisions of RCW 34.05.479 except that the decision of the Washington state patrol shall be final and is not subject to judicial review.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. A new section is added to chapter 71.09 RCW to read as follows:
For purposes of RCW 71.09.250 and section 9 of this act, "all other laws" means the state environmental policy act, the shoreline management act, the hydraulics code, and all other state laws regulating the protection and use of the water, land, and air.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. A new section is added to chapter 43.21C RCW to read as follows:
Secure community transition facilities sited pursuant to the preemption provisions of section 9 of this act and secure facilities sited pursuant to the preemption provisions of RCW 71.09.250 are not subject to the provisions of this chapter.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 13. A new section is added to chapter 90.58 RCW to read as follows:
Secure community transition facilities sited pursuant to the preemption provisions of section 9 of this act and secure facilities sited pursuant to the preemption provisions of RCW 71.09.250 are not subject to the provisions of this chapter.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 14. A new section is added to chapter 77.55 RCW to read as follows:
Secure community transition facilities sited pursuant to the preemption provisions of section 9 of this act and secure facilities sited pursuant to the preemption provisions of RCW 71.09.250 are not subject to the provisions of this chapter.
Sec. 15. RCW 36.70A.103 and 2001 2nd sp.s. c 12 s 203 are each amended to read as follows:
State agencies shall comply with the local comprehensive plans and development regulations and amendments thereto adopted pursuant to this chapter except as otherwise provided in RCW 71.09.250 (1) through (3), section 9 of this act, and 72.09.333.
The provisions of chapter 12, Laws of 2001 2nd sp. sess. do not affect the state's authority to site any other essential public facility under RCW 36.70A.200 in conformance with local comprehensive plans and development regulations adopted pursuant to chapter 36.70A RCW.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 16. A new section is added to chapter 71.09 RCW to read as follows:
(1) At the request of the local government of the city or county in which a secure community transition facility is initially sited after January 1, 2002, the department shall enter into a long-term contract memorializing the agreements between the state and the city or county for the operation of the facility. This contract shall be separate from any contract regarding mitigation due to the facility. The contract shall include a clause that states:
(a) The contract does not obligate the state to continue operating any aspect of the civil commitment program under this chapter;
(b) The operation of any secure community transition facility is contingent upon sufficient appropriation by the legislature. If sufficient funds are not appropriated, the department is not obligated to operate the secure community transition facility and may close it; and
(c) This contract does not obligate the city or county to operate a secure community transition facility.
(2) Any city or county may, at their option, contract with the department to operate a secure community transition facility.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 17. A new section is added to chapter 71.09 RCW to read as follows:
(1) Subject to funds appropriated by the legislature, the department may enter into negotiation for a mitigation agreement with:
(a) The county and/or city in which a secure community transition facility sited after January 1, 2002, is located;
(b) Each community in which the persons from those facilities will reside or regularly spend time, pursuant to court orders, for regular work or education, or to receive social services, or through which the person or persons will regularly be transported to reach other communities; and
(c) Educational institutions in the communities identified in (a) and (b) of this subsection.
(2) Mitigation agreements are limited to the following:
(a) One-time training for local law enforcement and administrative staff, upon the establishment of a secure community transition facility.
(i) Training between local government staff and the department includes training in coordination, emergency procedures, program and facility information, legal requirements, and resident profiles.
(ii) Reimbursement for training under this subsection is limited to:
(A) The salaries or hourly wages and benefits of those persons who receive training directly from the department; and
(B) Costs associated with preparation for, and delivery of, training to the department or its contracted staff by local government staff or contractors;
(b) Information coordination:
(i) Information coordination includes data base infrastructure establishment and programming for the dissemination of information among law enforcement and the department related to facility residents.
(ii) Reimbursement for information coordination is limited to start-up costs;
(c) One-time capital costs:
(i) One-time capital costs are off-site costs associated with the need for increased security in specific locations.
(ii) Reimbursement for one-time capital costs is limited to actual costs; and
(d) Incident response:
(i) Incident response costs are law enforcement and criminal justice costs associated with violations of conditions of release or crimes by residents of the secure community transition facility.
(ii) Reimbursement for incident response does not include private causes of action.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately.
--- END ---