Brief Description: Changing provisions relating to responsibility for costs of elections.

Sponsors: Senators Horn, Kastama, Roach, Haugen and Esser.

Hearing Date: 2/24/04

Staff: Matt Kuehn (786-7291).

Background:

A city, town, or special purpose district that holds an election in conjunction with a state or county election is responsible for their proportionate share of election costs. If the city, town, or district holds a primary or election independent from state or county elections, the city, town, or district is fully responsible for the costs incurred.

In odd-numbered year elections, the state is responsible for its share of costs related to state officers and measures on the ballot. The state pays no costs in even-year elections. Even-year election costs are borne by the counties and their subdivisions.

In determining shares of elections costs, some counties will first calculate costs related to state officers and measures, factor those costs out and then proration the remaining costs among the jurisdictions with races or issues on the ballot. This effectively means the county assumes the costs related to state races or issues. Other counties will not deduct state costs prior to pro-rationing. This effectively spreads the costs associated with state races and issues among all jurisdictions with races or issues on the ballot.

Summary of Bill:

In even-year, statewide elections, cities, towns, and districts are not responsible for any costs involved with statewide elections. Counties are fully responsible for statewide race or measure election costs in an even-year. In odd-years, the state is responsible for those costs.

Consequently, the only costs that a city, town, or district may incur are those costs directly related to races or issues on the ballot of the city, town, or district.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Available.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect on July 1, 2004.