BILL REQ. #:  H-2300.1 



_____________________________________________ 

SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1933
_____________________________________________
State of Washington58th Legislature2003 Regular Session

By House Committee on Local Government (originally sponsored by Representatives Berkey, Kessler, Cairnes, Buck, Sullivan, Orcutt, Hatfield, Jarrett, Miloscia, Gombosky, Grant, DeBolt, Quall, Woods, Schoesler, Conway, Lovick, Clibborn, Edwards, Schindler, McCoy, Eickmeyer and Alexander)

READ FIRST TIME 03/05/03.   



     AN ACT Relating to the integration of shoreline management policies with the growth management act; and creating a new section.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   (1) The legislature finds that the final decision and order issued in Everett Shorelines Coalition v. City of Everett and Washington State Department Of Ecology, Case No. 02-3-0009c, issued by the central Puget Sound growth management hearings board was a case of first impression for interpreting the integration of the shoreline management act into the growth management act, and that the board considered the appeal and issued its final order and decision without the benefit of shorelines guidelines to provide guidance on the implementation of the shoreline management act and the adoption of shoreline master programs.
     (2) This act is intended to affirm the legislature's intent that the shoreline management act be implemented in accordance with decisions of the shoreline hearings board and the Washington courts prior to the integration of the shoreline management act into the growth management act as provided by RCW 36.70A.480. Specifically, it is the intent of the legislature that:
     (a) The goals and policies of the shoreline management act, RCW 90.58.020, be read, interpreted, applied, and implemented as a whole;
     (b) The goals of the growth management act, including the goals and policies of the shoreline management act set forth in RCW 36.70A.020 and 36.70A.480, continue to be listed without priority; and
     (c) Shorelines of statewide significance may include critical areas as designated by RCW 36.70A.172, but that shorelines of statewide significance are not critical areas simply because they are shorelines of statewide significance.

--- END ---